S. J. Jananiy's Musical
-------------------------------------------
Prepare 1 1 lemon Tia Holding Sauna Then this way White Pore Cleansing Acne astringent - Duration: 10:38.
For more infomation >> Prepare 1 1 lemon Tia Holding Sauna Then this way White Pore Cleansing Acne astringent - Duration: 10:38. -------------------------------------------
COLLIDE - Starring Nicholas ...
For more infomation >> COLLIDE - Starring Nicholas ...-------------------------------------------
SCP-1575 Venus Statue | Object Class Safe | Transfiguration / Body Horror | Statue SCP - Duration: 11:24.
SCP-1575 "Venus Statue" Object Class: Safe
Item #: SCP-1575
Object Class: Safe
Special Containment Procedures: SCP-1575 is to be held in a 6m x 6m x 4m containment chamber
at Bio-Site 23, with direct access to Research Laboratory 3 at same.
Except when in use for testing, no water is to be allowed into SCP-1575's containment,
and after testing all water used is to be held in quarantine for use in further tests.
Description: SCP-1575 is a marble statue, standing approx.
2.75m high with an additional base of 0.5m.
The statue is a depiction of Venus (Roman goddess of love, beauty, fertility and seduction)
clad only in wrappings from the waist downwards.
The statue acts as a fountainhead; damage to the base shows that it was likely intended
as a permanent installation, with a single channel running from underneath the base up
through a hole in the mouth.
SCP-1575 shows no anomalous properties on its own, nor do samples removed from the whole.
An inscription on the base, partially obscured by the above-mentioned damage, indicates it
to have been sculpted in the early 16th century for a private collection in ██████████, Italy.
Any otherwise fresh water which is allowed to pour through SCP-1575 in its nature as
a fountain (henceforth referred to as SCP-1575-1) is shown to have mutagenic properties when
consumed or otherwise introduced into a body; external application (including long-term
submergence) does not trigger a mutation.
Non-human mammalian creatures who consume at least 0.5 liters of SCP-1575-1 daily will
begin mutating into a human being over the course of roughly one month, with ethnicity
roughly in accordance with humans native to the species' natural habitats.
For example, a European deer will have primarily Caucasian features post-mutation, while a
North American deer will have features like those of Native Americans.
Curiously, most modern breeds of dogs and cats will have indistinct or mixed racial
features.
Survivors of this process describe it as extremely painful, and it has an approximate 25% fatality
rate for females.
Males experience a 95% fatality rate, with most survivors having an androgynous appearance
with non-functional or completely missing genitalia.
Additionally, there is a 40% chance that the animal will retain one or more pre-mutation
features, such as fur, paws instead of hands and/or feet, a tail, non-human ears, etc.
The final apparent age of the subject is normally in accordance to the stage of life of the
creature involved (prepubescent, adolescent, adult, elderly).
It should be noticed that cases where the subject is gaining or losing a significant
amount of mass, appetites and bodily functions will shift to match.
Please see the attached testing logs for specific information.
After a successful mutation is completed, subjects normally display an intelligence
level typical for what is considered average for their species.
Several subjects have shown a somewhat increased capacity for problem solving than is considered
normal for their species; whether this is due to neural restructuring or a byproduct
of Foundation testing is currently unknown.
Many subjects which develop proper vocal cords are able to learn to speak, but typically
only with rudimentary phrases of basic needs (such as food, sleep, play, etc.)
Similarly, most subjects are able to achieve full mobility within two-to-four weeks of
stabilization, though manual dexterity takes far longer to perfect if the original species
had simple paws or hooves.
SCP-1575-1 does not have any notable effect on a creature's personality, memories or instincts;
all carry over from the individual animal's existing self despite drastic restructuring
of the brain.
Domesticated animals typically retain previous levels of affection for humans, though the
physical and mental trauma of the mutation process often leads to cases of depression
and other psychological issues.
Humans have not been observed to experience any notable effects when ingesting SCP-1575-1.
Non-mammalian creatures will mutate, but due to significant physiological differences they
will have a 99.9% fatality rate due to drastic and incongruous physiological differences.
Only 2 non-mammalian mutations were known to have stabilized; neither had completely
changed to a human form, and both were euthanized after brief study.
Addendum 1575-1: SCP-1575 was recovered from a facility named "The Miracle Farm", previously
owned and operated by Marshall, Carter & Dark Ltd.
The stated goal of the facility was to "present our clients with the finest in custom-ordered
pets, prey and companions."
Mobile Task Force Theta-2 ("Moreau's Morgue") was able to secure the facility, ██ on-hand
personnel, █ attending clients, and ███ living specimens in various stages of mutation; only
█ specimens were deemed fit for transportation and study, all others euthanized on-site.
Farm personnel and clients were detained for questioning, then given class A amnesiacs
and released.
A cover story of a runaway fire was implanted in their memories before release to explain
the destruction of their facility.
According to obtained records, at least ██ specimens were known to be in possession of clients
of MC&D.
MTF Theta-2's current mission is to track down and recover or destroy said specimens;
thus far, █ have been accounted for.
Addendum 1575-2: Select testing logs
Test 1575-2 Subject: Female Japanese field mouse (Apodemus
argenteus), adolescent Result: Subject expired after twelve (12)
days.
Cause of death determined to be due to overall body size increasing faster than the cardiovascular
system was able to supply.
Notes: Subject had undergone a 500% increase in overall size, measuring approximately 1.01
meters.
Subject had been observed consuming nearly 95% total body weight per day before expiration.
Test 1575-4 Subject: Male white-tailed deer (Odocoileus
virginianus), preadolescent Result: Partial transformation, stabilized
after thirty (30) days.
Notes: During mutation, subject suffered severe hemorrhaging in the pelvic area.
Reproductive organs atrophied, rendered asexual by end of mutation cycle.
Subject maintained tail and base for antlers; however, antlers do not grow beyond nubs typical
of yearling bucks.
Subject's final appearance androgynous, but otherwise typical of Eastern-seaboard Native
American.
Test 1575-6 Subject: Female Bengal tiger (Panthera tigris
tigris), adult Result: Subject expired after four (4) days
due to cardiac arrest and failure of liver and kidneys.
Notes: Due to the subject's aggressive nature, it was kept sedated during examination.
It is believed that the sedatives disrupted the normal mutation process and caused the
organ failure; future subjects not to receive sedatives unless at least 80% stabilized.
Test 1575-9 Subject: Female domestic canine (Canis lupus
familiaris) of mixed breed, adult Result: Experiment aborted after six (6) days.
Notes: Subject was discovered to have a significant flea infestation as well as intestinal parasites;
said parasites all were affected by SCP-1575-1.
Testing procedures updated, Dr. ████ sent notice to all staff working with SCP-1575.
Test 1575-12- Subject: Female Hyacinth Macaw (Anodorhynchus
hyacinthinus), preadolescent Result: Subject expired after twenty (20)
days, cause of death determined to be internal injuries suffered from extensive bone fractures.
Notes: It appears that in this case, the subject's skeleton was not able to change at such a
speed as to match the rest of the body; differing muscle functions and the stresses of the mutation
caused over 60% of the skeletal structure to break in various manners.
Curiously, the extremities of the wings had already begun to split and appeared to have
been forming into crude hand analogs.
Test 1575-15 Subject: Female grizzly bear (Ursus arctos
horribilis), adult Result: Mutation complete, stabilized after
thirty-two (32) days.
Notes: Subject did not consume any food or drink besides SCP-1575-1 during the first
twenty-nine days of mutation; subject's excreta shown to contain excessive amounts of organic
material, fatty deposits, blood, etc.
Test 1575-16 Subject: Female Grévy's zebra (also Imperial
Zebra, Equus grevyi), adolescent Result: Partial transformation, stabilized
after twenty-seven (27) days.
Notes: Subject's main body, hind legs and most of its head shifted to human with an
appearance of native African, while front legs and jaw structure remained most normal
for a zebra.
Subject showed extreme distress, difficulty of movement and impairment while eating, euthanized
after thorough examinations.
Addendum 1575-3: Notice from Dr. ████ regarding a minor containment breach involving SCP-1575:
Following the incident on the twelfth of this month, during test 1575-9, any animal to be
used in testing with SCP-1575 is to be thoroughly examined for both external and internal parasites.
Our initial beliefs that SCP-1575-1 only affected the primary host has proven wrong; it apparently
retains its mutagenic properties, even when ingested secondarily through the host's lower
GI tract or blood stream.
We absolutely do not need another instance of half-mutated flea-creatures, and the psychologist
is having a hard time helping Janet with her nightmares of a seven foot long tapeworm with
a screaming face tearing out of the belly of a dog.
- Dr. ████
-------------------------------------------
Baywatch - May 26th For more infomation >> Baywatch - May 26th-------------------------------------------
Week 2 Basic Building Blocks - Duration: 7:25.
Now that we've got some definitions under our belt, let's start talking about the basic
building block of an argument.
You have everything you need to know and understand the basic building block.
All arguments are made up of one thing: propositions.
Remember, propositions are atomic declarative statements.
That is, they are statements composed of a single truth value.
So propositions can function in one of three ways in an argument.
Propositions can be, function as a conclusion and that is the point of the argument.
It is the statement that the arguer is trying to prove.
Another way that propositions can function is as premises.
Premises are statements that are used as evidence or support for the conclusion.
You want to think about these as reasons why someone should believe the conclusion.
The final way that proposition can function in an argument are as non-working propositions.
And these are ones that do not serves as a premise or a conclusion.
So let's look at a few examples.
If I said that All fish have gills and Betas are a fish.
Therefore, Beta's have gills.
the first thing we want to do is identify the propositions.
That is, we need to reduce these sentences into atomic declarative sentences.
So, the first proposition would be that "All fish have gills."
The second proposition "Beta's are a fish."
The third proposition is that "Beta's have gills."
Now, ask yourself, "What point is the arguer trying to make?"
The conclusion is that Beta's have gills.
And the reasons the arguer gives for why Beta's have gills is that "Beta's are fish", the
first premise, and "All fish have gills," which is the second premise.
The order of the premises don't actually matter here.
Okay, so let's look at another example.
All unmarried bachelors are male and Tim is not married.
So Tim must be a bachelor.
What are the propositions?
That is, what are the statements that have a single truth value?
Let's reduce these.
The first proposition is that "All unmarried bachelors are male."
The second proposition is that "Tim is not married."
The third proposition is that "Tim must be a bachelor."
What is the point the arguer is trying to make?
If you said the conclusion is that "Tim must be a bachelor," you are correct.
And the premises that support that are that "Time is unmarried" and "All unmarried males
are bachelors."
So I have in parentheses here, "What is the IP?"
And what I mean by that is, in this argument, there is an implied but not stated premise.
Can you figure out what it is?
That is, the arguer is making an assumption that he's NOT stating.
The assumption, the implied premise is that Tim is male.
You might want to say "well of course Tim is male because Tim is a male name."
But that "of course" tells you that it's actually an assumption the arguer is relying on.
Let's look at a few more examples.
What if I said, Getting drunk loosens inhibitions and makes it easier to make friends.
You should get wasted every weekend!
Take a moment here and write out the propositions.
There are three propositions in this argument.
Now that you've done that, What is the point of the argument?
That is, which proposition functions as the conclusion?
If you said that "You should get wasted every weekend!" is the conclusion, you are right.
And what are the premises?
What propositions support the conclusion that "you should get wasted every weekend."?
"Getting drunk loosens inhibitions" and "getting drunk makes it easier to make friends."
Final example: Beyonce make visually interesting videos that deliberately exploit her sexuality.
Women who exploit their sexuality are not feminists.
Therefore, Beyonce is not a feminist.
Take a minute and write out each proposition in this argument.
I'll give you a hint: there are four propositions in this argument.
The first proposition is that "Beyonce make visually interesting videos."
The second proposition is that that "Beyonce makes videos that deliberately exploit her
sexuality."
The third proposition is that "Women who exploit their sexuality are not feminists."
The final proposition is that "Beyonce is not a feminist."
Let's go back to that first compound sentence.
Why are there two propositions in that sentence?
Well, it can be either true or false that "Beyonce make visually interesting videos."
And it can be either true or false that she "makes videos that deliberately exploit her
sexuality."
Because there is more than one truth value in that sentence, that sentence by itself
is a compound sentence, NOT an atomic declarative sentence.
If it is not an atomic declarative sentence, it cannot BE a proposition.
A proposition can only have ONE truth value.
All right.
So now that we've got the propositions, what is the conclusion of this argument?
"Beyonce is not a feminist."
Big tip: it said therefore.
Typically when you see the word therefore, you're dealing with a conclusion.
All right- so if the arguer is trying to prove that Beyonce is not a feminist, what are the
reasons that the arguer gives to conclude that Beyonce is not a feminist?
That is, what are the premises that support this conclusion?
"Beyonce make videos that deliberately exploit her sexuality" and "Women who exploit their
sexuality are not feminists."
But what about that first proposition we identified?
Beyonce makes visually interesting videos?
Does that support the conclusion in any way?
It does not, so it is a non-working proposition (NWP), because it is neither the conclusion
nor is it a premise that supports the conclusion.
No comments:
Post a Comment