Well you seemed to like the jacket, so…
I'll keep it.
I have a bit of a fascination with stop lights (or traffic lights, if you prefer).
They boil down to remarkably simple devices, little more than indicators, but thanks to
driver's education and the magic of the human brain, they are remarkably effective
at safely controlling traffic at intersections.
Well, most of the time.
Now, there's so much to get into regarding traffic lights.
Traffic engineering is a fascinating subject which I don't feel qualified to discuss,
but there's quite the rabbit hole to fall into.
This video is about a simple but groundbreaking innovation in the traffic light and the lessons
it can tell us about innovation in general.
This is about the LED traffic light, and the caution of "but sometimes".
I live in an area of my town that's not terribly well traveled.
Though there are many 4 lane roads with speed limits of 35 to 40 miles an hour, the traffic
volume honestly doesn't often justify having two lanes in each direction.
Many of the stop lights in this area have been neglected, and are still using good-'ol
fashioned incandescent bulbs with colored glass lenses.
Actually, some are so old that they still have the written text "WALK' and "DON'T
WALK" in their pedestrian signals, and there are even a few that use the old 8 inch lenses
for the green and yellow lights, with only the important red light getting a full 12 inch lens.
Granted, these stop lights have had their control systems upgraded over the years.
There are vehicle presence detectors embedded in the road surface to alter their timing
and behavior, and they are equipped with photocells to detect the tuned strobe light on emergency
vehicles and stop traffic in opposing directions.
And some have even had countdown timers added to the pedestrian signals.
But the fixtures themselves have remained mostly unchanged.
They are still the same incandescent traffic lights that may very well have been in place
for a good number of decades.
I should add that vehicle presence detection has been around long before the LED traffic
light, and it's very likely these intersections have the same control equipment they've
always had.
But in any case, the fact that they are still using incandescent lamp technology...
is a little odd.
Setting aside the nostalgic or aesthetic reasons to prefer an incandescent stop light (I'll
admit the fade-in fade-out as each light changes states is charming), the LED traffic light
is just objectively better in nearly every respect.
For example,
Incandescent stoplight fixtures, because they are designed to be opened to replace the bulb,
typically get dirty on the inside over time.
And it seems the technicians who replace the lamps often don't seem bothered to clean
the lenses or reflectors.
This leads to many lights with a dull appearance that's hard to see in bright sunlight.
This obviously isn't great, and is actually kinda dangerous,
but whatever.
The LED light, on the other hand, is completely sealed.
In fact...
here's an LED traffic light module.
Yes, they really are this big, they just seem much smaller when they're grandstanding
on their pedestals or hanging up high in the air . These are designed with the ability
to replace the lenses in existing incandescent lights and function as a retrofit device,
as well as simply be the default standard for new traffic light installations.
Because the entire module is replaced if needed, it can be completely sealed.
LED lights thus don't end up looking like...
that.
These LED modules use about a 10th the energy of the incandescent lights they replace, which
is not only great for energy savings, but it means battery backups for the lighting
control system can keep the intersection controlled for hours even during a blackout.
And of course, they last so much longer than the light bulbs in an old fashioned fixture do.
This 116 watt light from Sylvania only lasts 8,000 hours, which may seem like a lot, but
assuming a roughly 50/50 on time for green and red, that won't even cover two years.
And since pretty much every intersection has at least 2 lights visible in each direction,
there's a total of at least 16 of these bad boys in a very small intersection, not
including yellow.
This would mean that a light will go out about every two months, and let me tell you, that's
remarkably in line with how often I see a light go out at any given intersection.
In fact, on the day I left to start taking photos of the stoplights around me like the
big 'ol dork that I am, this light burnt out.
Granted, there are two other lights providing redundancy, but they're also really dirty
and hard to see anyway.
I went out again a few days later to take some photos I had forgotten to take, and now
this light is also out.
What fun!
At this one intersection, including all arrows, pedestrian signals, and standard orb indicators,
there are 94 lights just waiting to burn out.
Conversely, you almost never see an LED stoplight with a signal that's out.
They last so long that it's a very rare occurrence.
It does happen, it's not like they last forever.
But even when they do fail, some designs don't even fail all at once, with this module still
mostly functional save for some dead diodes.
In the past two years, I've only seen one LED light completely fail anywhere, whereas
I've seen about a dozen lights go out just in my neighborhood.
Now, I can't tell you why my local streets and sanitation department (or whatever agency
is tasked with maintaining these specific traffic controls)
hasn't invested in retrofitting these stoplights
with LED replacements.
They're just an odd holdout, I guess, or perhaps they think it's cheaper to just
do things as they are.
News flash-- it isn't, because if these lights do use 116 watt bulbs, then with pedestrian
signals included, at any given time the intersection is using around a kilowatt and a half (or more),
meaning it costs about $3.60 to operate daily assuming average rates in Illinois.
Add to that the cost of relamping the fixtures every two years ,
or far more likely the reactionary
maintenance when a lamp fails multiple times a year, and it seems really foolish to still
be using these traffic lights as they are.
Especially because these modules typically end up on eBay or elsewhere for about $10 each.
I don't know how much they cost new from the manufacturer, but I can't imagine they're
terribly expensive.
But, when the LED stoplight first made its way onto the scene, one of its central advantages
became a disadvantage.
See, because the good 'ol incandescent bulb is so terribly inefficient, it spews a lot
of heat out all sides and kept the fixtures toasty warm.
This had the lovely side effect of keeping snow and ice from building up on them in cold climates.
Many municipalities started discovering that their new LED fixtures, which are 10 times
more efficient and thus release just 10% the heat,
didn't do that.
In bad snow storms with high winds, it is very possible for the snow to make its way
past the visor and stick to the face of the stoplight.
Not producing enough heat to melt this snow, the LED stop light might become impossible
to see in this scenario.
This caused quite a few accidents, some of which were regrettably fatal.
However, if the drivers at fault remembered their driver's education, a stoplight that
isn't indicating should be treated as a stop sign, turning the intersection into an
all-way stop.
But people are stupid, so accidents happen.
As you may imagine, the news reports started flooding in.
"Energy efficient stop lights cause accidents!"
"These new LED stoplights can't melt snow!"
"The green revolution know no bounds--cold traffic lights leave drivers confused!"
Et cetera, et cetera, et cetera.
The really stupid articles pointed out that, while a solution might be possible, it would
eat into the energy savings presented by the LEDs.
That is a really dumb argument, as we'll discuss momentarily.
I even recall a news report when I was younger suggesting that a heated surface would use
MORE energy than an incandescent traffic light, so really, what's the point?!
This is the danger of "But sometimes".
It goes a little something like this: The LED stoplight is more energy efficient, costs
less to operate, requires less maintenance, can allow for a feasible battery backup solution,
lasts longer, are brighter and easier to see (particularly in direct sunlight) BUT SOMETIMES
snow and ice builds up on them, so clearly they are bad.
Ugh, this makes me so disappointed in humanity!
When there's a new innovation which changes how we do things for the better, its benefits
are obvious.
The LED stoplight is a perfect example.
It allows stoplights to better accomplish their rather important task of being visible,
makes them more reliable than (and with battery backup makes them functionally superior to)
an incandescent light, and saves municipalities thousands of dollars, with Wisconsin reporting
in 2009 that they save $750,000 in energy costs annually, which isn't even mentioning
maintenance costs.
However, when the "But Sometimes" rears its ugly head, people tend to freak out.
Suddenly, all those benefits go away, because in this one particular facet of stoplight
functionality, the wasteful and maintenance-heavy incandescent lamp is accidentally superior.
Suddenly, when the new solution presents a new problem, all we think about is the problem.
Which leads to the truly stupid part of this argument.
But Sometimes occurs only some of the time!
It's a sometimes!
Articles that complain about a potential solution requiring more energy, and thus reducing the efficiency
of the new LED stop light, just kinda gloss over the fact that on every day it's NOT snowing,
the issue is completely irrelevant.
Sure, if we add heaters to the LED module to melt snow it might need more power, but
only when it's snowing, dingus!
It wouldn't take too much imagination to enable wireless control of an intersection's
stoplights to turn on the heaters while it snows.
Even if the lights used a bit more power while the heaters are on, the other 300 days of
the year when it's NOT snowing don't just go away.
It doesn't take too much thinking to realize that it's still saving a lot of energy over
the long run.
And again, the traffic light is not at fault when an accident occurs.
All drivers know (or at least should know) that a malfunctioning traffic light means
you must stop and proceed with caution.
But we trust people so little on remembering this simple procedure that nearly every intersection
has a folded up stop sign ready to be deployed when the traffic lights fail.
I'm not opposed to that, I think it's a good idea, but in reality it shouldn't
be necessary.
Also, in personal experience, a snow storm severe enough to cause buildup on the traffic
light lenses is pretty out of the ordinary.
I've never personally encountered a traffic light that's completely obscured with snow.
I've seen some partially, but never enough to make the signal impossible to distinguish.
After all, there are pretty big visors over the lenses, so it's got to be a real blizzard
to cause a problem.
And really, in those conditions, you should just avoid driving altogether.
This isn't to say that the problem doesn't happen.
Surely it does.
But come on, it's not frequent at all.
Now, the correct response to the "but sometimes" is to account for that sometimes and solve
the problem.
One potential way that doesn't use any energy is through an altered visor with a scoop on
top designed to redirect wind to flow across the lens and blow snow off of it.
But for those wanting a more high-tech solution, well take a look at this.
General Electric now sells what they call "GTX Flex LED Heated Shell".
These traffic light modules have defroster wires across their face, just like the rear
window of your car.
What's more, they have sensors onboard measuring temperature and humidity
to determine when icing conditions are likely and automatically switch on the heaters.
The spec sheet says these heaters use only 30 watts, which means even when they are all
on, a three-light traffic light is using less power than a single incandescent bulb.
Not much less, but I must remind you that the need for the heater is rare, and only a sometimes.
It looks like this is a relatively new product, with the site touting it as NEW and the copyright
date on the spec sheet being 2016.
So it seems we got along well enough without this innovation for, uh, for a while.
Probably because people realized how infrequent the problem actually is, but anyway--the problem
has been solved.
The "but sometimes" is now a never.
The moral of this story is that when faced with a unique, unforeseen, or difficult problem
that comes about as a result of doing things in a different way, don't just give up!
It's beyond foolish to fly in the face of progress, especially when the result of the
progress is so obviously better, just because there's a tiny little sometimes maybe issue
that we haven't had before.
I'll bet you no municipality that has switched to LED traffic signals wants to go back to
the old way of doing things.
But that's what news articles and media coverage like this seem to advocate for.
Now, obviously I don't want us to not acknowledge problems.
That would be silly.
But when discussing these problems, we need to look at them from all sides.
Just how bad is the problem, really?
How often does it occur?
What would we be giving up if we abandoned our efforts, and should we abandon them?
What can we do to combat the problem?
Does the problem need a technical fix, or do we need to re-educate people and adjust
their behavior?
Perhaps the problem isn't so much a problem, rather it's a need for change elsewhere.
But for goodness sake, we need to work to solve the problem.
Every innovation has changed how we do things in some way.
That's the very idea of progress.
Sometimes this change brings new issues to light, and may bring inconveniences from time
to time.
But I don't think this should be seen as a reason to stop progress.
I hope that as new technologies and innovations become available that provide us advantages
just as the LED traffic light has that we don't simply focus on the new problems they
might create.
Together, we should be asking how to solve those new problems.
When we ask that question and work towards the answers, we can truly make progress.
Ok, so there's some other stuff I want to bring up real quick.
First, I'm officially launching my second channel.
Head on over to Tecnhnology Connections 2 if you'd like to see what's on the inside
of one of these LED modules.
I've always been a little curious.
Don't, uh, don't go over just yet, hang on a sec.
Ok, well here's a card, but the endscreen will have it, too.
And there's a link down below.
One thing that I've noticed change about traffic light behavior is the timing of the
right turn arrow.
I realize this whole video has been from the perspective of the US, where we drive on the
right and our traffic signals look like,
well like that
and all the things you've been seeing in the
video, so maybe this isn't a thing in other countries, and honestly this could be a regional
thing within the US.
But at intersections where there are both left turn only and right turn only lanes,
the right turn lane will typically get a green arrow while the opposing traffic gets a protected
left, because no one will be coming from the left hand side going straight across.
It used to be very common for the green arrow to light up as soon as the the yellow light
appeared, which was great because it meant if you were turning right, you knew that you
could just proceed even though forward traffic was about to stop.
Most intersections these days seem to wait until the opposing traffic gets their protected
left before illuminating the right turn arrow, which means you need to stop before you actually
get that arrow.
I suppose this might be a safety thing, but really I can't see how much safer it is because
pedestrians would not be entering the intersection at all while there's a protected left because
vehicles will be crossing their path no matter which direction they are going.
And it's really annoying in this age of distracted driving, because some drivers see
the light turning red, come to a stop, and then look at their phones without realizing
there's a turn arrow now illuminated.
If the arrow were already lit, they could have just kept going and annoyed someone elsewhere
Going back to my particular town's situation, there's one intersection near me that's
an absolute hodge podge of stuff.
Almost nothing matches anymore in this intersection.
There are individual LED retrofits among incandescent lights, such as this pair of signals where
there is only one LED signal among the 10 total lights.
But most amusingly, the pedestrian signals are almost all completely different.
There are still some old written Walk/Don't Walk signs combines into a single fixture,
then there's the newer pictographic
signals with the talk to the hand and the walking white guy, then there's an LED version of
the same thing with two distinct shapes, and there's an LED signal where the shapes are
combined, and finally there's ONE that has a countdown timer.
That strikes me as particularly odd because it means the controller for this intersection
is capable of driving a countdown timer, so clearly it has been updated within the last
decade or two, but there are some comparatively ancient fixtures here.
I realize this style of light where there are multiple diodes right at the face that
fail over time is kind of an old style at this point.
Most newer traffic lights are like these, where they are designed to mimic how incandescent
fixtures look.
In fact, GE calls these "incandescent look".
That's part of why I want to check out the innards of one of these.
I doubt there's a single 10W LED chip in here, so I would imagine they also don't
necessarily fail all together, but it would be a lot harder to tell if it's failing
at a glance.
I glossed over the vehicle presence detection a little bit and just showed what it looks
like, and sometimes this isn't even visible.
Generally, there will be a loop of wire embedded below the road surface that's designed...
(camera beeped)
Really?
I glossed over the vehicle presence detection a little bit and just showed what it looks
like, and sometimes this isn't even visible.
Generally, there will be loops of wire embedded below the road surface that are designed to
detect a change in their magnetic field brought about by a large metal object above them
(such as a vehicle)
You can often see these, particularly if they were added to an already existing road surface.
Sometimes you'll notice them way far back from the intersection, and by adding them
here the traffic control system can count how many vehicles are approaching and thus
how much time is needed for them to cross the intersection.
There's some pretty clever thought going into all these systems.
Oh, and sometimes you'll see cameras up where the traffic signals are, and some of
these are used for presence detection using computer vision.
Also, the emergency vehicle detectors are a pretty neat thing that perhaps you know
how they work, but I'll tell ya anyway.
I said "tuned strobe light" earlier.
What I mean by that is that emergency vehicles have a single white strobe light, often in
the center of their light bars, which flashes at a very specific frequency.
It's often hard to see on video because... strobe lights and video just don't
really get along, but it's this one here on this ambulance.
The traffic light controller is looking for a signal at that specific frequency coming
from the photocells up top, and when it sees it it will begin stopping traffic.
These white indicators are used to confirm to the driver of the emergency vehicle that
the signal was received and that opposing traffic is being stopped.
In Illinois, where I live, the lights will flash in the direction the emergency vehicle
is coming from, and they will illuminate steadily for opposing traffic to warn them an emergency
vehicle is coming.
Interestingly, this isn't really taught in driver's ed, and the lights don't have
any sort of sign to explain their purpose, but hopefully enough people have figured this
out to make them useful.
Lastly, for those towns who like the charm of these old 8 inch stop light fixtures, you'll
be happy to know that GE (and probably others, too) make LED retrofits for these.
So come on, guys.
Let's get with the program.
Thanks for watching, I hope you enjoyed the video!
If this is your first time coming across the channel, please consider subscribing.
As always, a HUGE thank you to supporters on Patreon!
Your support is what keeps these videos coming.
If you're interested in supporting the channel too, please check out my Patreon page!
Thanks for your consideration.
Alright, so if you would, head on over to Technology Connections 2, and it'd be super
great if you'd subscribe there!
I'll be putting more extra content up there as time goes on.
I'll see you next time!
For more infomation >> 馬哈蒂爾任命林冠英為財長 馬來西亞股市先跌後穩 - Duration: 3:21. 
For more infomation >> What is Hypnotherapy? Is it FAKE or REAL therapy? - Duration: 6:21. 
For more infomation >> 하태경 의원, 가상화폐 개입설 증거 공개 "변절자 주사사 문재인 아들 문준용" 의혹?|K-News - Duration: 6:33. 
For more infomation >> Toyota Yaris 1.5 VVT-I Aspiration | Navigatie | Airco | Toyota Safety Sense | - Duration: 1:10. 
For more infomation >> Incredibles 2 Sneak Peek
For more infomation >> Audi Q5 2.0 TFSI QUATTRO 211PK PRO LINE S AUT, Navi, Xenon, LMV, 79 dkm ! - Duration: 1:06. 
For more infomation >> 「阿雅超丑，拉低七仙女顏值」，小S當年嘲笑阿雅，如今阿雅女兒萌翻一票網友！ ✔ - Duration: 5:14. 
For more infomation >> Salma Hayek balance sur Harvey Weinstein et défend l'égalité salariale - Duration: 3:47. 
For more infomation >> Fiat 500 1.2 Lounge | leer | airco | automaat | panorama - Duration: 1:04. 
For more infomation >> 3D печать и шлемы для швейцарских гвардейцев Ватикана - Duration: 3:29. 
For more infomation >> 同为尹夏沫，大S太老，张雪迎太纯，黄灿灿就只能凑数 - Duration: 8:08. 
For more infomation >> 内阁部长事件，华哥终于站出来说句公道话了！ - Duration: 21:41. 
For more infomation >> Ces aliments sont plus efficaces que le viagra. Ils garantissent une incroyable érection - Duration: 11:12. 
For more infomation >> Pros (and Cons) of Keeping a Small Business Small - Duration: 4:21. 
For more infomation >> 土耳其這招玩的溜，美俄兩國都被耍了，但很可能會玩火自焚 - Duration: 3:58. 
For more infomation >> SOUPLANTATION :: De la salade, de la soupe, du pain et de la crème glacée à volonté! | Sandra Ty - Duration: 4:35. 
For more infomation >> Un père ivre et violent arrive chez la mère d'accueil – 3 minutes plus tard - Duration: 9:18. 
For more infomation >> Koh-Lanta : le candidat accusé d'agression sexuelle placé en garde à vue - Duration: 1:33. 
For more infomation >> Mercedes-Benz CLS-Klasse 400 D 4MATIC AMG LINE Rijassistentiepakket plus, Head-up display, Comand, A - Duration: 1:14. 
For more infomation >> Chevrolet Aveo 1.3D LT / 5 deurs - Duration: 1:07. 
For more infomation >> Kia cee'd Sporty Wagon 1.4 Fifteen ISG Trekhaak Rijklaar - Duration: 1:06. 
For more infomation >> Boules de dattes et amandes sans cuisson à faire pour Ramadan - Duration: 2:10. 
For more infomation >> Carla Bruni-Sarkozy pose avec sa fille cachée (photo) - Duration: 1:17. 
For more infomation >> Sci Hub Opens Up a World of Knowledge - Duration: 4:22. 
For more infomation >> Message de Crystal Lake - Duration: 0:29. 
For more infomation >> Cette mère n'ose plus sortir dehors à cause de son nez, mais regardez son incroyable transformation - Duration: 7:40. 
For more infomation >> Remèdes naturels pour la sécheresse des yeux - Duration: 8:10. 
For more infomation >> Faites-vous cela la nuit ? La réponse révélera des choses surprenantes au sujet de votre santé… - Duration: 8:30. 
For more infomation >> Séminaire "Sciences et jugement critique" - Guillaume Lecointre - Duration: 24:08. 
For more infomation >> Please Subscribe To The Channel - Duration: 4:53. 
For more infomation >> Soy Luna 3x20-Roller vs. Red Sharks kihívás lesz? [magyar f.] - Duration: 4:14. 
For more infomation >> The Never Settle Film: Version 5 - Duration: 1:06. 
For more infomation >> 생각보다 T-50A 수출의 반대급부로 F-15K를 구매해야 한다는 말들이 많더군요. - 군사 기밀. - Duration: 4:14. 
For more infomation >> Ford USA F-150 5.4 Supercab Youngtimer - Duration: 0:52. 
For more infomation >> 차세대 전투기 F-15SE 사일런트 이글 독도 왕복 힘들다는 기사의 실제 진실 - Duration: 9:20. 
For more infomation >> Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Liên Quân Mobile "chạy ngay đi" đồng đội giành nhau MVP - Duration: 31:17. 
No comments:
Post a Comment