-------------------------------------------
「行きたい街」1位のフランス・ボルドーの魅力 モン・サン・ミッシェルの奥も明らかに|24H ニュース - Duration: 1:34.
For more infomation >> 「行きたい街」1位のフランス・ボルドーの魅力 モン・サン・ミッシェルの奥も明らかに|24H ニュース - Duration: 1:34. -------------------------------------------
COD WW2 NEW MULTIPLAYER MAPS FEATURE!! - Duration: 4:42.
Yo what is going on guys it is your boy Yogge here and I know before I start the
video in my last video which was four days ago or five days ago I said I would
be uploading daily the reason why I didn't do that is because first of all
the first day I was lazy and I didn't upload second day third day because I
was trying to finish the triple play right and think about I'm sitting there
all day literally like 15 hours just sitting on my ass trying to finish this
triple play right and once I finish it look at what I did look just just watch
this
you're just going to sleep how about that one think about it guys all that
hard work and it gives me a ballistic night for my range weapon guys a
ballistic night this is going to be the last black ops 3 gameplay that you'll
see on this channel never play multiplayer on black ops 3 ever again
anyways guys today we're gonna be time of world war 2 maps so yeah if you guys
are excited for each guys the story I like but absolutely you smash that shit
I so leave a like and comment which think about the maps World War 2 what
kind of Maps you guys want to see so yeah without further ado let's throw
this intro alright guys so happens straight into it basically in an issue
of the edge magazine I have no clue what this is but a feature they called the
World War 2 quotes so I guys basically in this magazine we got some more quotes
from Michael Condrey and Glenn's go for you so I'll show you guys right here it
says such an environment storytelling blah blah blah basically what I
understood from is you guys can obviously read it but what I'm saying is
that some maps and multiplayer will not be featured in the campaign so if you do
not know yet basically where our old G multiplayer maps come from the first one
we get in the game without DLC usually comes from the campaign except for you
know maps like Newtown or stuff like that I don't know where Newtown came
from but yeah and black ops 1 obviously you had all the maps that were based on
the campaign for example jungle based on the campaign or if we go tomorrow for
two high-rises based on the campaign I believe rust was you know at the end of
modern warfare 2 you know you can just tell a lot of multiplayer maps have them
based off of the campaign but in world war 2 they're going to be doing that a
little bit differently the main reason being is because in the campaign they're
mainly focusing on specifically a European front they're you know they're
going to Europe mainly so they had a new idea of you know introducing new
multiplayer maps and giving them their own story while you play it in
multiplayer they're calling it an environmental storytelling it's a new
feature or that they're going to put in in the new
maps and multiplayer so yeah that's pretty cool so basically there's going
to be different maps and multiplayer that were not in the campaign and you're
going to be able to tell and you know listen to it story where it came from
by playing on the map now I don't know what you guys think but that is actually
a really really good idea I really like this idea that we're getting the free
maps we can tell where they came from obviously in my opinion I still would
have liked you know just the og you know base the maps off of the campaign but
they're doing something different and they're trying to do it right and I feel
like they should be doing this specifically for DLC because I mean look
at black ops 3 last DLC like micro where the hell does that map come from I mean
it was cool at first but then it just got annoying like nobody wants to play
on that map at least I don't maybe you guys do I
don't know but yeah guys so that is really really cool that is basically one
new thing that they're added in and two called three World War two that's a
really really cool thing that I think they put it into the game don't you guys
think about in the comments down below do you guys think this is cool I think
it's pretty awesome or do you guys think it's not cool
because you're not putting in maps from the campaign say guys sledgehammer games
we'll be reviewing called in world war two books player at e3 did I really kid
that way for it I can't wait to see the Bullock's play gameplay probably going
to be stealing gameplay from ali-a something like that so I can't go but if
a subscriber after is watching this and you will be going to e3 and get a
gameplay of it send it to me and all you know and I'll give you all the credit
I'll put your channel in the description and all that and I'll shout you out if
you do give me gameplay for Walt or if you guys do go to e3 but yeah guys
anyways hope you guys didn't if you guys admission if you like these videos they
say stay healthy you know yeah I'll see you guys on the next one
-------------------------------------------
IT WORKS?!- Garry's Mod - Duration: 2:55.
Can We Hit 10 Likes?
-------------------------------------------
Trump pulls U S out of non binding Paris Climate Accord — Here's why he was right to do it - Duration: 5:04.
Trump pulls U.S. out of non-binding Paris Climate Accord � Here�s why he was right
to do it
by: JD Heyes
Far-Left Democrats and so-called �environmentalists� who still believe the global warming hoax
are furious at President Donald J. Trump for keeping his campaign pledge to withdraw the
United States from the �non-binding� Paris Climate Accords signed onto by the Obama administration.
But perhaps after they calm down and allow their blood pressure to return to normal,
they can take a rational, reasoned look at why the president made his decision; if they
afford him that courtesy, there is no way they can conclude that his decision was wrong.
In making the announcement from the White House Rose Garden Thursday afternoon, Trump
stated that he felt obligated to withdraw from the agreement � which should have been
sent to the U.S. Senate by Obama to be ratified as a treaty, because that�s what it was,
in both style and substance � because it is �a bad deal� for American workers,
taxpayers and companies.
(RELATED: The Paris Climate Accord is GENOCIDE against plants, forests and all life on our
planet)
Trump also knocked the cost of the agreement � which will rise to some $450 billion a
year, much of which would have to come from the U.S. � while major polluters who are
also signatories to the deal do not have to comply with the accords� emissions limitations
for more than a decade.
Meanwhile, the U.S. has to comply immediately.
The president also lashed out at his critics who said pulling out of the deal would be
a disaster for the country, noting that remaining in the agreement would cost American families
and businesses billions per year.
Also, he said, the agreement prohibited the U.S. from �conducting its own domestic economic
affairs� by preventing the development of our own natural resources, like clean coal
and natural gas, both of which create far fewer emissions than other forms of energy.
�I was elected to represent the people of Pittsburg, not Paris,� Trump said.
�It�s time to pursue a new deal that protects� the environment, as well as the American people.
Trump, according to various experts and analyses, was right to withdraw from the current agreement
as written.
�Through a litany of regulations stemming from the agreement, Obama has essentially
offered up the U.S. economy as a sacrificial lamb to further his own legacy,� Americans
for Tax Reform noted Wednesday in a post on its website.
�Sadly, the agreement will not just hurt the country�s growth as a whole, but will
trickle down to low-and-middle income Americans.
As a result of the agreement, energy costs will skyrocket, in turn raising the cost of
utility bills for families and increasing the costs of consumer goods.� (RELATED:
UN official actually ADMITS that �global warming� is a scam designed to �change
world�s economic model�)
A study of the agreement by the Heritage Foundation, released in April 2016, found that the agreement
would have resulted in the adoption of government policies that dramatically increased electricity
costs for a family of four between 13 and 20 percent annually.
In addition, the analysis found that American families would lose out on some $20,000 in
income by 2035, regressive (not progressive) economic policies that no doubt would hit
the nation�s poorest the hardest.
[Meanwhile, we�re sure that Obama won�t have any trouble paying his electric bill,
no matter what it costs]
Other analysts, as Trump noted in his speech, noted that the loss of U.S. annual gross domestic
product would be close to $3 trillion by 2035, while reducing employment in the U.S. by about
400,000 jobs, half of which would be in manufacturing.
But perhaps most galling of all is the fact that even the far Left admitted that the agreement
would accomplish virtually nothing � and certainly was not the global carbon emissions
destroyer its principle advocates made it out to be.
Politico Europe reported:
In fact, emissions reductions are barely on the table at all.
Instead, the talks are rigged to ensure an agreement is reached regardless of how little
action countries plan to take.
The developing world, projected to account for four-fifths of all carbon-dioxide emissions
this century, will earn applause for what amounts to a promise to stay on their pre-existing
trajectory of emissions-intensive growth.
As Trump said, �The agreement is a massive redistribution of wealth from the U.S. to
other countries.�
There is no good reason to remain in it, just as there was no good reason for Obama to have
signed it.
No comments:
Post a Comment