Good afternoon my name is Diana Ziegler I am the Director of the
Department of the Interior Museum. It is my pleasure to welcome you here not
only to the Department of the Interior but specifically the Rachel Carson room
of course the namesake is the the wonderful Rachel Carson who
Mark Madison will be speaking on today
Mark has been with the US Fish and Wildlife Service as their historian since 1999
In that position he helps oversee the 500,000 objects in their collections
housed at the US Fish and Wildlife Service Museum and Archives in the
National Conservation training center in Shepherdstown, West Virginia prior to
that he taught at the University of Melbourne in Australia and Harvard
University. He has a PhD in history of science from Harvard and he also spent
three years of tropical reforestation as a Peace Corps volunteer in the
Philippines. Please help to welcome Mark Madison I appreciate you guys
coming out. I do feel compelled to let you know there is a Christmas party
going on simultaneously I don't think it's a conspiracy but I do feel guilty
as Diana noted I I've been in the agency long enough to remember when this room
was dedicated initially the rather awkwardly sounding Rachel Carson Large
Buffet Room as if Carson was a big fan of the Golden
Corral or horses and now it's it's more appropriately named the Rachel Carson
room so when Diana and Tracy were nice enough to invite me down to DC on the
the first snow day of the year we thought maybe Carson would be a good
topic since this is the venue for it and one of the things historians like to say and one of the things I like to say
so anyway everybody knows Carson everybody knows Silent Spring but very
few know she worked for the Department of Interior or for Fish & Wildlife
Service and its predecessor so I thought that'd be worth focusing on considering
where we are today and and since a few of you may be less familiar with Carson
than others let me just start with a brief overview of her federal career
Carson had already received a Bachelor of Arts in biology from Chatham
University and a master's in zoology from Johns Hopkins when in 1935 in the
midst of the depression she became the primary breadwinner for her extended
family because she had to financially support them she sought a job that
combined her love of writing and marine biology and she actually found the
perfect job in the Bureau of fisheries Would built upon both of these interests
which unfortunately for us was in the Department of Commerce. Department of
Interior but she'll make her way over here the Bureau of Fisheries in case you
don't know was founded in 1871 and it's the nation's first federal wildlife
conservation agency kinda at the cutting edge of fisheries science of its day
eventually it was moved from the Department of Commerce to the Department
of Interior in 1939 and then combined with the Bureau of biological survey in
1940 to create my agency the Fish & Wildlife Service and the best catch for
Interior at that point turned out to be Rachel Carson moving to Interior allowed
Carson for the first time to expand out of her exclusively marine ecosystems
with this broader purview she rose quickly in the newly minted Fish and
Wildlife Service, eventually becoming chief editor of our publications which
would in the modern equivalent would be like the Head of External Affairs with
the success of her popular second book The Sea Around Us in 1951. She was able
to leave the lucrative field of federal service and retire and that really ended
a symbiotic 16-year relationship with the federal government and this is just
to give you an overview before we delve into some of the more interesting parts
of her life. Ten years after her she retired from the federal government
Carson published a book that literally changed the world. The book most of us
know her for a Silent Spring and then she died of cancer two years after
its publication so what I'll do briefly is look at the importance of her period of
government service not just to say it's important because we all work for
Interior because we're here because Carson wouldn't have been Carson without
those 16 years of government service Diana nicely set me up by pointing out
I'm a historian of science and there's actually three areas of science that
we're trained to look at and I thought it'd be interesting just for this talk
to see if they apply to Rachel Carson and they might seem a bit old-fashioned
and a bit obscure compared to some things but these are things historians
of science are trained to look at probably the oldest one is scientific
patronage that is who supports science financially and that goes all the way
back to Galileo and Charles Darwin. Historians of science also think about
issues of how you translate science for the public right we don't just take
reams of data and just throw it out to the public and expect them to understand
it but we've had good scientific popularizers depending on your age you
may be more familiar with Jacques Cousteau or Neil deGrasse Tyson or Carl
Sagan and then the last thing historians of science are taught to look at is
networks of science who you're working with who your colleagues are some of you
may be with your colleagues today and how that impacts your science
so I thought it'd be interesting to take what I was trained to do when I used to
be a professor in history of science for many years and see how it applies to
Carson and if we can learn something new beyond what's written on the back of
this wall here which is kind of a padded obituary for Carson. So let's start with
patronage I once again I purposely took chose an old word just to get you
thinking because patronage truth be told is a word we associate more with Galileo
than Rachel Carson but of course Carson benefited from having steady employment
that supported her dreams and aspirations for someone who loved both
writing and the sea. Her work in the Bureau of Fisheries offered a unique
opportunity to practice what she loved and in fact in addition to being supported
financially she also rose and prospered during various reorganizations the Great
Depression and the Second World War all of this with a federal job that itself
wasn't so taxing that she couldn't create a number of publications at night
at home and this is really interesting although it's just a PowerPoint but
Carson was an insane workaholic and the amount of articles she published with
research he got out of the Department of Interior and the Fish and Wildlife
Service is mind-boggling one of my favorites is this Why Our Winters Are
Getting Warmer. She actually wrote this article in Popular Science about global
warming back in 1943 some of the other interesting ones are she wrote a lot of
articles as a stringer for the Baltimore Sun, Women's Home Daily readers I just
condensed the book The Sea Around Us she published a lot in popular periodicals
While Carson worked for the federal government she also published columns
regularly in the Baltimore Sun other periodicals and still had the spare time
to write two full-length books about the sea. She was paid adequately in a federal
job but not too well which was also critical
Carson's persistent need to support an increasingly extended family meant she
was always looking for freelance writing work and perhaps more attuned
than most scientists to the popular science that periodicals were willing to
pay for. Now although patronage seems mundane and
not as exciting as intellectual history clearly the need to eat drove Carson's
career interests and opportunities. In Carson's case we might all benefit from
heeding the words of that famous historian deep throat to follow the
money. Now let me move on to the second thing
historians are trained to look at translating science for the public- an
underappreciated skill for all our greatest scientists Carson was supported
and rewarded by her agency employers because she was that rarest of birds
herself someone who could translate science effectively for the public.
Carson's initial writing job for the Bureau of Fisheries was to create short
radio scripts on new and interesting aspects of marine biology called Romance
Under the Waters, a much sexier title than the contents actually supported. She
supplemented her contractors pay of six dollars and fifty cents a day by selling
off some of the same material as features in the Baltimore Sun for twenty
dollars an article Carson's work was part of a broader New Deal attempt to
use the popular media of the day, radio to explain the increasing federal role
in conservation and if you want to see an artifact from the early radio days
you can go to the DOI Museum where they have a very nice on-the-air light in
there. Radio really was the Internet of the 1930s. It was the way you could reach
the American public directly and we used it extensively
We still have LPs in my archive where some of these old radio scripts are.
Fascinating how Carson was good but not necessarily a natural at translating
conservation science into the public domain. One of her first assignments was
to create a brochure with the evocative title, The World of Waters and her
initial draft was far too literary for a government fish pamphlet so her editor
suggested she submit it to the Atlantic which he did with the new title, Undersea
in effect launching her professional career in 1937. I told you historians
like anniversaries, so this is the 80th anniversary of Carson's mature literary
career. In 1936 Carson was able to parlay her writing skills into a full-time job
as a junior aquatic biologist at the princely salary of 38 dollars and 48
cents a week. Her first job as a government scientist involved studying
the fisheries and wildlife nearby in the Chesapeake Bay region and then
publishing pamphlets and reports on at work
throughout her career Carson was tasked with the most difficult of literary
chores.She had to take raw data and complicated scientific analysis and then
translate that for public consumption. In 1940 Carson source material, as
I mentioned before, greatly expanded as the Bureau of Fisheries joined the
Biological Survey and suddenly her writing domain extended beyond merely
the finned to also include the furred and the feathered. With the expanded role
she also rose to become assistant biologist in 1942. However, Carson
remained primarily a writer in spite of her scientific title. Bureaucracies are
sometimes blind and despite having written the critically acclaimed and
well-received, Under the Seawind in 1941, Carson's writing talents were for many
years willfully underutilized in the Fish and Wildlife Service. She became
editor of our journal The Progressive Fish Culturalist and she created a
series of conservation bulletins called Food from the Sea none of which are
particularly exciting then in 1945 she was made an informational specialist
Informational Specialist it's a charming title we no longer have much use for in
the government but it reflected accurately what Carson's role had been
in the last ten years. Carson remained relegated to publishing
mostly fini features for fisheries but the following year an opportunity arose
to broaden her perspective to wildlife and to change the whole genre of
government conservation writing. In 1946 Carson finally was given the chance to
create 12 Wildlife Conservation booklets from inception to post-production a
series she called Conservation in Action, which I plagiarized the title
of this talk. Conservation in Action was created to explain to the public the
work, purpose and the necessity of American wildlife conservation.
Carson hoped it would become a new template for all future government
publications. To research the series Carson travelled across North America to
see firsthand biology or conservation in action. The result was the best
illustrated and easily most eloquent government publication written,
particularly the five issues that Carson composed entirely herself. It's kind of
interesting, Conservation in Action is a beautiful publication. it was one of the
first government publications to come out with color, to come out with full
illustrations, to be written by who was basically the EO Wilson of her day and
it was also the one frustration Carson had. We talked to Carson's colleagues. We
asked, you know did she have frustrations in a government job and there's been a
lot of myths about Carson being ostracized and Fish and Wildlife and so
on. None of this is true but the one frustration we heard again and again
from her colleagues who were still alive- we did oral histories- was working with
the GPO on this publication the GPO didn't want to print them in color, the
GPO did not want to print full scale photographs and it they didn't want to
work with these line illustrations. It was a perennial frustration for over the
course of four years but she persevered and let me read part of it to you
because of this Carson is eloquent just trying to explain why we do wild
conservation of both wild areas and wildlife and every one of these
opened up with a little prologue called the Sign of the Flying Goose and let me
just read the last paragraph which is her succinct
explanation of what her whole agency does the Fish and Wildlife Service and
more specifically the National Wildlife Refuge System house. Carson wrote wild
creatures like men must have a place to live
as civilization creates cities, built highways and drains marshes it takes
away little by little the land that's suitable for wildlife and as their space
for living dwindles the wildlife populations themselves decline. Refuges
resist this trend by saving some areas from encroachment and by preserving them
or restoring when necessary the conditions that wild things need in
order to live it's the most succinct description of our mission and certainly the mission of
the refuge system that we've ever come up with. Like I said we were very
fortunate to have probably the best environmental writer of the 20th century
writing our press releases and our brochures for 16 years
it was the heyday of this area at the same time that Carson was working
another one of her colleagues was Howard Zahniser who went on to write
the Wilderness Act it's it's almost mind-boggling how many conservationists
came through the Department of Interior in the 30s and 40s kind of at the heyday
of New Deal conservation. By 1949 Carson had risen to chief editor of all service
publications which meant basically every intricacy of wildlife biology crossed
her desk and this is going to turn out to be important and most of these papers
benefited from her ability to paint pictures with prose it also marked
unfortunately the beginning of the end for her time in the agency as she became
more popular and more self-sufficient financially she was already working on
her bestseller The Sea Around Us which freed her up financially from the
federal and freelance work which had kept her family afloat for the previous
decades. At Carson's retirement in 1952 based on the success of The Sea Around Us
which amazingly was made into a film and even more amazingly was made by Irwin
Allen who became is the Master of Disaster for Towering
Inferno. Carson hated the film. As you can see there were battles with eels and
giant squids that are not in her book at all, but it won best picture in the
documentary category in 1956. If you ever get a chance to, we should screen it
here in the Rachel Carson room some day, but anyway the book was so successful
was made into a film, won an Oscar and Carson had enough money to leave the
agency and she wanted to write full time so when she retired in 1952
she'd enjoyed an extended apprenticeship digesting the most complex wildlife
science of the day and then translating it into both journals for the popular
audience and also government publications with the same audience in
mind her tripartite job description in those years of working for the
government being writer, naturalist and scientist would prove critical to
the creation of a new environmental perspective on nature that is she didn't
just just born a great writer and a great translator of science and a great
synthesizer of science. She had to work hard at it she produced a number of
books and hundreds of shorter publications to hone those skills the
majority of which was done during her government service time. Finally let me
look at the last aspect of how we might understand how science comes about and
that's networks of science. Carson's time in the government put her in contact
with some of the richest science of the day including some vociferous internal
debates that would provide an important theme of her later books.That is she
wasn't just exposed to the best ecological science of the day which was
being produced not far from here in Patuxent, but she also dealt with some
internal displays. So networks of science, the last aspect. Carson's marine biology
books were obviously based on the beginning of her career with the Bureau
of Fisheries our long lived federal wildlife agency who really
engaged in pioneering studies in marine biology including the creation of the
Marine Biological Laboratory Woods Hole that was created by the Bureau of
Fisheries and this is really fun because you can see a very young Carson at the
beginning of her career I think Carson at the end of her
federal career she went to Woods Hole number of times so Carson was perfectly
positioned to research and write her three best-selling oceans books while
ensconced in the federal agency in charge of marine conservation, but when
she moved to Fish & Wildlife Service in 1940, there was another network that was
just being developed that would put Carson at the forefront of the new
environmental movement. Patuxent research refuge in Laurel, Maryland had been
established in 1936 the same year Carson entered the federal government as a
full-time employee and in fact Carson and Patuxent's legacy have been
intertwined ever since Patuxent began carrying out scientific wildlife
research in 1939 and it was practically in the backyard of Carson's home in
Silver Spring, Maryland. In 1944, Patuxent scientists began
studying the effects of the new pesticide DDT and how it impacted fish,
mammals and birds. Carson was in daily contact with these
researchers and always on the lookout for extra money.
Carson pitched a story on DDT to Reader's Digest way back in 1945
including as one of her supporting documents a press release she'd written
on DDT for the Fish and Wildlife Service in that year The Reader's Digest passed
on the idea but Carson's curiosity and interest in the subject remained until
it finally emerged almost twenty years later in the book Silent Spring now
Carson enjoyed a unique pesticide perspective in several ways first the
work at the Patuxent research refuge was pioneering it was complex and it was
almost entirely unknown to the American public
Carson however knew the lead researcher out there Clarence Kadim and by editing
and translating Patuxent scientific work into rarely read press releases she
was able to assimilate a tremendous amount of early data and the effects of
these new pesticides perhaps equally important is the fact that in 1945 most
Americans if they had any knowledge of DDT had a very positive impression of
the pesticides and just to prove that these are some popular commercials
excuse me advertisement for DDT shortly after World War two and here's a film
lauding this miracle pesticide from 1946 just to give you a context when Carson
first started researching it it begins with a warp on development of DDT this
diabolical weapon of modern science saved millions of humans but healed
billions of insects man with his newly discovered force has at long last gain
the upper hand in our age-old struggle. The really heavy blow fell only a few
months ago it came from laboratories where top scientists from famous
universities and from industrial and government organizations collaborated to
develop something new and different. They succeeded. They perfected Pestroy
the most effective weapon man has ever wielded against insects in both its
forms powder and liquid Pestroy means doomsday to us insects for this new
insect destroyer contains a lot of DDT not just the little it's DDT content is
even higher than government specifications but the really sure-kill
feature of this insect killer isn't simply that it contains DDT it's the way
that it makes sure that bugs get the DDT that's in it.
for example take this liquid form Pestroy DDT synthetic resin coating
ideal for vertical surfaces it's brushed off easily and quickly and dries in half
an hour it forms a clear long-lasting protective
coating scarcely noticeable on most surfaces other preparations sprays for
instance not only irritate the nasal passages and fog up the atmosphere but
quickly lose their effectiveness as the fog dissipates. As the result,
spraying must be repeated time after time
but not so with this Pestroy goes right where it should go to kill insects once
applied, it keeps right on killing them week after week month after month. Here's
why. It's compounded with a new type of synthetic resin which binds DDT to any
surface. Makes it cling. Keeps it from brushing off or blowing away. So that
gives you a sense of how DDT was regarded 1946. It was a miracle pesticide
helped win World War II and it was being rapidly commercialized to be used
in myriad applications. When Carson first began to notice some ill effects from it
coming out of the Patuxent research refuge. Now like I said, Americans we call
DDT as an important wartime weapon against disease World War II was the
first war when fewer soldiers died of disease than combat- largely from
pesticides like DDT and it was also a useful ally against mosquitoes fire ants
crop pests and so on. Carson's introduction to DDT by contrast was
primarily from the fishery and wildlife biologists perspective and from that
perspective DDT was an unrivaled destructive agent to these researchers
that Carson edited and worked for the chemical longevity and the broad
spectrum of this class of pesticides meant collateral poisoning of mammals
birds and fish and non injurious insects DDT became an icon of these
non-discriminating pesticides that Carson would evocatively rename as
biocides and here she is talking about it
here she is giving Senate testimony about these pesticides
First, I hope this committee will give serious consideration to a much neglected
problem. That of the right of the citizen to be secure in his own home against the intrusion of poisons
applied by other persons. I speak not as a (undeciferable), but as a biologist and human being but I strongly feel that this is or should
be one of the basic human rights
here is Carson talking a little more about this subject on a CBS reports
documentary she did in 1963 with Eric Sevareid. Carson speaking before.
We've heard the benefits of pesticides we have heard a great deal about their safety
but very little about the hazards very little about the failures the
inefficiencies and yet the public was being asked to accept these chemicals
was being asked to acquiesce in their use and did not have the whole picture
so I set about to remedy the the balance there. it's nice when you get to
modern enough history people can speak in their own words. Carson's upset about
the misrepresentation of this pesticide as benign. It certainly wasn't from all
the studies being done at Patuxent and and felt there was a ethical issue about
trying to disrupt the balance of nature.
Now Carson's scientific informants on DDT were impressive and far-ranging
running from field biologist and refuge managers she encountered during their
cross-country studies for the Conservation in Action series, to the
laboratory scientists moving in and out of Patuxent, to the network of academic
scientists working at land-grant University co-op research units who
collaborated with her agency on wildlife sciences and submitted all of
their materials to Carson who in addition to being chief editor was also
our chief agency librarian. This growing realization of the wildlife scientists
in the 50s and late 1940s that they'd been lied to about DDT was something
Carson never forgot or forgave and it fueled her anger at toxins in general
Finally Carson reached her peak in the Fish and Wildlife Service during a
bigger internal agency debate about predator and rodent control policies
Since 1885 the Fish and Wildlife Service and its predecessor agencies had played
the lead federal role in controlling so-called pests- primarily predators and
rodents who damaged crops or decimated game animals as an agency with roots in
the Department of Agriculture and a mission to increase useful game species
this what wasn't surprising but beginning in the 1940s a number of
biologists in the agency began to question this role of trying to reduce
predators and rodents in the wake of new developments in the field of ecology
especially wildlife ecology. The first text had been written about wildlife
ecology in the mid 1930s by Leopold Charles Elton was developing the idea of
food chains things were changing and Carson was part of that era. One of
Carson's correspondence in the agency was Olaus Murie who'd sagely noted as
early as 1929 and in fact predators carried out rodent control for free
it was self-defeating to try to kill both of these. Carson as
an informational specialist was in the midst of these debates between
scientists and the agency regarding the role of predator and rodent control the
role in the food chain the balance of nature versus heavily managing nature
and the idea of game management versus wildlife management all of which would
reappear in Silent Spring Carson's own views seem to evolve during
a time of the service as she became less and less comfortable with the predator
and rodent killing and more and more supportive of natural biological
controls she gradually swung her allegiance towards a group of agency
scientists petitioning to end the predator and rodent control program it
was a theme that re-emerged forcefully in Silent Spring which argued for
restraint not total control over nature biological not man-made devices to keep
pests a tolerable levels so many of the themes in Silent
Spring actually arose earlier in internal agency
debates about balance of nature versus total control over nature. Carson came to
her epiphany much earlier than the agency which only dropped their
eradication mission in 1986 after a century of killing pests. Carson's
growing distrust of species of eradication and even the term pest was a
critical theme in Silent Spring Carson noted the very term pesticide was
dismissive and perjorative as the important role of insects in the food
chain wasn't recognized. That is, an mosquito to a Robin is not a pest, it's
dinner. She felt that the term biocide would be more ecologically accurate what
these pesticides were doing was wiping out a small part of the biota
This dismissal of eradication and chemical control of her species also fueled her
most ardent critics who sensed the danger of her ideas including the chemical
companies. Here's a little debate between the chemical companies and Carson
The crux, the fulcrum over which the argument chiefly rests is that
Miss Carson maintains that the balance of nature is a major force in the survival
of man. Whereas the modern chemist, the modern biologist, the modern scientist
believes that man is steadily controlling nature. Now to these people
apparently the the balance of nature was something that was repealed as soon as
man came on the scene. Well you might just as well assume that you could
repeal the law of gravity. The balance of nature is built of a series of
interrelationships between living things and between living things and their
environment. So how to summarize Carson's life and role as a federal employee the
longest job she held in a very interesting life. Well Carson's federal
career provided ample literary and scientific vistas for her to explore
while preparing her to translate them for the public. Her network of scientific
colleagues and their internal debates provided to her the raw material and the
confidence to engage in the harsh debate that followed Silent Spring which you
just saw a clip from. So in many ways it prepared her for what became her most
famous book, but beyond that if we just think about that that's too narrow a
look at Carson's impact. Carson also transformed her agency the Fish and
Wildlife Service from 1936 to 1949. Rachel Carson was the only female
biologist in the entire agency. Today over half of our new employees are women
and the majority of life science students in this country are female a
huge transformation from Carson's day and a transformation
I'm convinced Carson was a part of as the most famous biologist of the mid 20th century
another way she transformed the agency was through the Endangered Species Act
when Carson worked for the US Fish and Wildlife Service it primarily protected
game species and charismatic bird species. Today Fish and Wildlife is the
primary agency in charge of the Endangered Species Act the most
revolutionary and idealistic environmental legislation ever passed
and a direct result of Carson's clarion call to protect all of the nation's
fauna, to broaden out and even protect insects for fear of unintended
consequences
finally when Carson lived her first passion was the oceans and in Carson's
lifetime the oceans enjoyed precious little protection today almost 700
million acres of waters and 150 million acres of lands are managed by her home
agency the Fish and Wildlife Service making it the largest public lands and
water manager in the world Carson never dreamed of that but it
would be nice maybe in the future to name a marine National Monument after
Carson there's already a refuge named after her in Maine. All new employees to
the agency are taught about Carson and strongly encouraged to consider as they
carry out their mission WWRD what would Rachel do. So let me end with this note
the tendency in both religion and environmental history is to focus on the
epiphany the moments of inspiration from St. Paul on the road to Damascus to
Rachel Carson writing Silent Spring we tend to focus on the pivotal moment in
time that changed our world in these cases literally changing our
environmental world. However, if we don't just look at the pivotal moment or the
one canonical text, if instead we looked at the journey and examine that in more depth
looked at the journey not just the destination we might discover the
frustrations and the inspirations that shaped later work if we went all the way
back to our first book Under the Seawind it's generally regarded as her weakest
came out in 1941 its anthropomorphic and it's a bit of a throwback to kind of
earlier 19th century nature writing but as Carson grew as a federal
conservationist her writing matured became more focused became more eloquent
became more scientifically grounded and became more impactful her latter two
marine biology books were both more eloquent and scientific no mean
accomplishment by the time of Silent Spring in 1962 Carson had tapped into a
new stream of environmental thought focused on the human impact on nature
the role of toxins and the need to protect all species these three themes
would eventually coalesce into the modern environmental movement I am
biased of course I work for the same agency Carson did but I think I'm
accurate and suggesting that none of this would have been possible without
the federal infrastructure which supported which nurtured which
occasionally provoked and eventually inspired Rachel Carson. Thank you guys
very much
No comments:
Post a Comment