Youtube daily report Oct 19 2018

[♪ INTRO]

Despite the fact that we've been sending humans into space consistently

for over half a century, space travel remains super dangerous.

I mean, you're getting a ride from some very powerful and very controlled explosions.

And we were reminded of that danger last week, when a scheduled launch of the Soyuz rocket

to the International Space Station had to be aborted mid-flight.

Luckily, astronaut Nick Hague and cosmonaut Alexey Ovchinin are safe and sound back on Earth.

But now we have to figure out exactly what went wrong before anyone else can go,

which threatens ISS operations.

While there have been some upgrades made over the years, the Russian Soyuz rocket family

is virtually unchanged from the late 1960s; a small capsule sits atop a 50-meter-tall rocket.

At its base, that rocket is surrounded by four booster rockets to give the entire

mass the necessary oomph when it's first taking off.

And right now, it's the only way we have of sending humans to space.

Two minutes after liftoff, those extra boosters are supposed to break off from the central rocket.

But on October 11, it looks like something went wrong with that process.

Instead of continuing their climb with the new push of the central engine,

the astronauts cited feeling weightless.

They were suddenly in free fall.

Shortly thereafter, the computer automatically triggered a launch abort.

The crew capsule separated from the rocket and fell back to Earth, where it landed safely.

Albeit in the middle of nowhere, but they did find them.

Now all crewed launches are on hold while Russia's space agency

Roscosmos investigates exactly what went wrong.

But that is not good news for the three crew members currently living on the ISS.

They were scheduled to return to the Earth in December, with a new team of three joining

Hague and Ovchinin on the station and continuing operations and experiments.

Now their missions will either have to be extended, or they'll have to abandon the

station in the Soyuz capsule currently docked.

Even though the crew has plenty of provisions, the fuel in that lifepod

is only cleared to last until January.

If the order is made to abandon the ISS, it will be the first time since 2000 that

we haven't had a single person living there.

Now, it's not like the ISS is gonna fall out of the sky if there are no people on it,

but we won't be able to do any maintenance.

Already, the spacewalk Hague and Ovchinin had trained for, to replace the batteries

on the station's solar panels, was cancelled.

For now, Roscosmos plans to try the launch again in the spring of 2019.

With an additional report coming out in the next few days,

hopefully we will hear some good news.

But unfortunately, this is not the only failure space missions have suffered this month.

Less than a week before the failed Soyuz launch, NASA saw two of its space-based telescopes

perform emergency shutdowns.

On October 5th, the Hubble Space Telescope suffered a mechanical failure,

and only 5 days later, the Chandra X-ray Observatory got a bad data reading

that interfered with its momentum sensor.

Because they're a bit too out of the way to send any technicians,

all of our space-faring technology has programming that instructs them to enter a safe mode

when they detect something wrong.

They lock themselves into a safe position, including pointing their mirrors away from

the Sun and their solar panels toward it, and switch over to backup hardware.

It happens more often than you might think.

For example, the infrared Spitzer telescope automatically entered safe mode back in 2006,

and the Dawn spacecraft has done it at least twice - once in 2011, and again in 2014.

It's just weird that two events happened so close to one another, and to a failed rocket launch.

In Hubble's case, it comes down to the failure of one of its gyroscopes,

which allows us to precisely orient the telescope.

During the last crewed service mission in 2009, astronauts installed 6 new gyroscopes,

but with the most recent breakdown, there are only three that still work.

Hubble only runs on three at a time, though, and the gyroscopes are going to break down over time.

This most recent one was in its death throes for the past year.

And if necessary, it is perfectly capable of running on just one.

So this mechanical failure isn't the end of the world; it's not even the end of Hubble.

Unfortunately, when we tried to switch Hubble over to its final backup gyro, the craft kept

reporting that it was rotating 100 times faster than it actually was.

Strangely, it's only the baseline rate that's off.

It is accurately reporting any changes in speed.

But it's enough of a problem that we can't use Hubble at the moment.

Chandra also had a gyroscope problem, although it seems to have just been a temporary glitch.

For three seconds, the gyroscope sent bad data

that made the computer think it was moving faster than it was.

The telescope seems to be back to normal now, but mission scientists

plan to keep an eye on that gyroscope for a while.

These satellite failures are really just a sign of NASA's

ageing soldiers in the battle to study the universe.

Chandra was launched in 1999, and Hubble in 1990.

Still, both telescopes are doing some amazing and great science up there,

so here's hoping we get at least a few more years out of them.

Thanks for watching this episode of SciShow Space News!

Guess what? You are all invited to a livestream extravaganza!

This Monday, October 22nd, we are having an eight-hour-long livestream,

during which we will encourage people to join our Patreon, and we will maybe explode some pumpkins

and do trivia and experiments, and have a spooky science hour, and lots of other fun things.

Trust me, we have plans. Shenanigans begin at 1pm Eastern, over on the main SciShow channel.

Mark your calendars. We'll see you there!

[♪ OUTRO]

For more infomation >> 3 Space Mission Problems in a Week | SciShow News - Duration: 5:31.

-------------------------------------------

Prince William and the Wildlife Trade, Canada Backs Vegan Burgers - Weekly Vegan News By LIVEKINDLY - Duration: 4:17.

Welcome to LIVEKINDLY's weekly news recap.

Covering the top news from this past week,

up to the 19th of October 2018.

Prince William says it's his duty

to protect endangered wildlife.

"...The urgent challenge of the Illegal Wildlife Trade

is one we face as a global community."

The Duke of Cambridge has issued a declaration

that unites global financial organisations

in the fight against the global Illegal Wildlife Trade

also known as the IWT.

He says that:

"It is time to treat the Illegal Wildlife Trade

as the serious organised crime that it is."

Named the "The Financial Taskforce,"

the 30 financial institutions backing Prince William

against the IWT include Standard Chartered,

HSBC, RBS, and Bank of America.

Just in time, as the World Wildlife Foundation

says that many protected animals

are well-known targets of the IWT.

A short documentary on a former beef farmer,

who gives his cows to a sanctuary, wins best film.

73 cows was directed by award-winning filmmaker

Alex Lockwood, and won best film

at the Ottawa International Vegan film festival last Sunday.

The film documents the journey of Jay Wilde,

the first farmer in the UK to trade beef farming

for sustainable vegan organic farming.

After becoming friends with many of the cows,

Wilde faced an ethical dilemma.

How could he continue the family beef farming business?

"I couldn't, sort of, disconnect

that feeling of having to get the job done

from the fact that they were

individuals rather than just

sort of units of production, 47 00:01:56,190 --> 00:02:00:050 just more than a number really." 48 00:02:00:050 --> 00:02:01,230 Instead of living with guilt,

the farmer gave custody of his herd to a sanctuary,

and turned to organic farming instead.

[CHEERING]

Football Fans couldn't tell that vegan burgers

and hot dogs weren't made from meat.

Sainsbury's is the UK's second-largest grocery chain,

To celebrate its new range of vegan meats,

Sainsbury's treated football fans to free burgers,

hot dogs, melts and chilli dogs -

only they weren't told until after that it was all vegan.

Many football stars are adopting plant-based diets.

Fabian Delph credits his produce-heavy eating habits

with helping him bounce back from many injuries.

"And yeah, this season's been absolutely

class for me and,

to top it off with a World Cup,

I'm absolutely delighted."

Sergio Aguerro, Lionel Messi,

[SPORTS ANNOUNCER] LIONEL MESSI!

and Hector Bellerin are among some

of the other plant-based players.

The Canadian government has invested $153 million

to keep the vegan Beyond Burger at fast-food chain A&W .

Over the summer, A&W added the vegan Beyond Burger

to nearly a thousand Canadian locations.

"That's plant?" "What plant?"

"It tastes exactly like meat."

The vegan patty has been extremely popular since its debut,

with some locations saying

that it even outsold the chain's beef burger.

The Canadian government's grant money

comes from the Innovation Superclusters program:

"What are superclusters?

Superclusters are areas of high business activity,

hotbeds of innovation, where people come together,

ideas are born, and the best companies grow.

And will be used to open processing plants

for beans and peas - the key ingredients in the Beyond Burger

- in Canada's western provinces.

With this investment, the government hopes

to meet the rising demand for plant-based protein

and to prevent future shortages.

That's it for today.

Remember to subscribe and hit the red bell

so you never miss another news segment.

We'll see you again next week

for Livekindly's vegan news in a nutshell. [MUSIC FADES]

For more infomation >> Prince William and the Wildlife Trade, Canada Backs Vegan Burgers - Weekly Vegan News By LIVEKINDLY - Duration: 4:17.

-------------------------------------------

TJ Yeldon Fantasy: Jaguars' RB Is Ready to Go for Week 7 | Heavy.com - Duration: 3:30.

TJ Yeldon Fantasy: Jaguars' RB Is Ready to Go for Week 7 | Heavy.com

The Jacksonville Jaguars have been struggling over the last couple of weeks.

As their quarterbacking situation with Blake Bortles gets uglier by the week, their franchise running back, Leonard Fournette can't seem to get healthy enough to get back out on the field.

And to make matters worse, their always reliable backup TJ Yeldon continues to fight back at injuries as well, hence the emergency signing of Jamaal Charles last week.

Don't worry though, fantasy owners.

TJ Yeldon is going to be just fine this week.

As the running back returned to practice on Thursday, he has officially been taken off the injury report as of Friday afternoon.

His ankle/foot injury will no longer hold him back as the running back intends on playing this week against the Houston Texans.

Is Yeldon a Good Play for Week Seven?.

Yeldon has seen a decreased amount of carries over the last two weeks, as he has only logged 18 carries for 94 yards.

It was clear that his nagging ankle injury might've had something to do with that.

Despite not having a significant workload, Yeldon was averaging an impressive 5.2 yards-per-carry.

This week, as he is no longer questionable, we should see an increase in Yeldon's workload as the Jaguars offense continues to struggle.

The Jaguars will face the Texans, who have a decent run defense.

But it shouldn't affect Yeldon's usage at all.

He will be a solid RB2 for at least this week, as Fournette continues to miss time.

As for Jamaal Charles, it's doubtful that he cuts into any of Yeldon's workload this Sunday.

He is strictly there to be as an emergency option for Yeldon as he continues to fight his injuries and that's it.

As a substitute for Fournette, Yeldon is a solid play.

For DFS purposes, he could come as a very valuable play.

For more infomation >> TJ Yeldon Fantasy: Jaguars' RB Is Ready to Go for Week 7 | Heavy.com - Duration: 3:30.

-------------------------------------------

Audi A6 Avant 40 TDI 204pk S tronic Sport - Duration: 0:55.

For more infomation >> Audi A6 Avant 40 TDI 204pk S tronic Sport - Duration: 0:55.

-------------------------------------------

Should You Write a Catchy Title for Your Scientific Paper? - Duration: 8:16.

Hi.

I'm Karen McKee, retired scientist and author with another video about scientific writing.

Did you know that there is a group of Swedish scientists who have a running bet as to who

can publish the most papers before retirement with titles containing Bob Dylan quotes?

The paper that kicked off the contest was this one published in Nature Medicine in 1997.

"Nitric oxide and inflammation: the answer is blowing in the wind"

More papers with Dylan-inspired titles followed.

Are catchy titles like this a good idea?

In this video, I'll address this question and talk more broadly about what goes into

a good title for a scientific paper.

[music]

Successful authors put a lot of thought into writing their titles.

This is because the title of a paper is the single most important factor determining how

many people will find and eventually read that paper.

If a title doesn't sound interesting or relevant, people will pass the paper by.

On the other hand, a title that is thoughtfully crafted will attract readers.

A good title will also help convince a journal editor that the paper is worth considering.

But how do you come up with an effective and compelling title?

Well, there are a number of dos and don'ts when writing your title.

One admonition is to avoid unnecessary phrases such as "a study of" or "an investigation of"

Such phrases, which are more common in older papers, usually do nothing more than add to

the length of the title.

Today, journals usually limit the number of words or characters used in a title, so it

makes sense to omit unnecessary words.

You also want to avoid jargon, acronyms, and abbreviations in the title because only a

handful of experts will understand what these mean, as in this hypothetical example.

Although a few experts will understand that the acronym ADH stands for the enzyme alcohol

dehydrogenase, many potential readers will not.

Another mistake is to write a title that is too broad and does not convey what the paper found

For example, a title that just states the broad topic of the research:

Response of coastal wetlands to sea-level rise

Is this study about all coastal wetlands?

In all geographic locations?

Unless it's a review paper, probably not.

More importantly, this hypothetical title does not reveal what the study found.

Here is a title from one of my published papers:

Someone reading just the title knows that we specifically studied mangroves, a type

of coastal wetland, and conducted the work in the Caribbean Region.

The title also explains the key finding of the paper, which is that these mangroves adjust

their soil elevations in relation to sea level through biological, rather than just physical processes.

In other words, our findings were novel and of interest to others.

But what biological processes?

Exactly where does this adjustment take place?

You have to read the paper to find out.

That's what you want to do with your title.

Capture the reader's attention and provoke them to read your paper.

Another point that some experts mention is that you should avoid the use of question

marks, colons and hyphens in a title.

In general, it is better to state a clear finding instead of posing a question.

And use of colons or hyphens often means the title is too long.

However, such punctuation marks may not always be problematic.

One of my most highly cited papers has a question mark and a hyphen in the title.

Use of a question mark might be appropriate, for example, if your study's findings provided

evidence for a mechanism but could not demonstrate it conclusively.

In this study, we had strong but circumstantial evidence for the role of drought in causing

dieback of salt marshes.

The question mark acknowledges that we did not find the smoking gun, but did identify

a strong suspect.

But if you have a clear outcome, go with a declarative statement that conveys your key

finding.

Another common admonition is to avoid overly long titles with too much detail.

Some studies have shown that papers with short titles receive more citations than ones with

longer titles.

Papers with shorter titles may be easier to read and understand and, hence, attract more

readers.

It's also possible that authors of highly cited papers tend to craft more concise titles

or publish in journals restricting title length.

My recommendation is that you should not be aiming for a title with a specific word count,

but one that best fits your paper and that contains important keywords.

The reason you want to pay attention to keywords in titling your paper is because search engines

use the words in a document's title to assign its ranking in a search.

For example, here is the working title of a review paper I coauthored:

"The relative role of mangrove vegetation in maintenance of soil elevations within the

intertidal habitat"

Unless this is your field, it's unlikely that this title will convince you to download and

read this paper.

More importantly, that title lacks an important key phrase, which is sea level rise.

Here is the final title of our paper:

"How mangrove forests adjust to rising sea level"

This title is more attractive and shorter than the original and contains several search

terms that people are likely to use to find information on the topic of our paper.

OK.

Let's return to the topic of catchy titles and if they are a good idea.

Apparently, there are hundreds of scientific papers with allusions to song lyrics and literature.

Besides Dylan, Shakespeare, Lewis Carroll, and Star Trek are favorite sources of inspiration,

according to this study.

While catchy titles may sound clever or amusing, they probably shouldn't be used for a typical

scientific paper.

You've already heard the reasons why.

One reason is that not everyone will get the Bob Dylan quote or other saying you might

use in the title.

Another reason is that the extra words add to the title length.

The catchy title may not clearly convey the key finding of the paper

And finally, the catchy title often includes words that will not help readers find your

paper in an online search.

In the end, your goal in crafting a title for your paper is to condense your paper into

a single, brief statement that sends a clear message and simultaneously attracts readers.

To see how to distill your message down to a single sentence that can be used as a title,

see the video mentioned in the description.

Also, I've included some references to articles about titles of scientific articles at the

end of this video and in the description below the video.

I hope you find this information useful when you are writing your next scientific paper.

And don't forget to like my video if you found this helpful.

[music]

For more infomation >> Should You Write a Catchy Title for Your Scientific Paper? - Duration: 8:16.

-------------------------------------------

Fiat 500X - Duration: 0:36.

For more infomation >> Fiat 500X - Duration: 0:36.

-------------------------------------------

Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 165pk 2WD TS+ Lease Pack - Duration: 1:08.

For more infomation >> Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 165pk 2WD TS+ Lease Pack - Duration: 1:08.

-------------------------------------------

Suzuki Baleno - Duration: 1:07.

For more infomation >> Suzuki Baleno - Duration: 1:07.

-------------------------------------------

Suzuki Swift - Duration: 1:10.

For more infomation >> Suzuki Swift - Duration: 1:10.

-------------------------------------------

Ford Focus - Duration: 0:49.

For more infomation >> Ford Focus - Duration: 0:49.

-------------------------------------------

Suzuki Swift - Duration: 1:10.

For more infomation >> Suzuki Swift - Duration: 1:10.

-------------------------------------------

Suzuki Swift - Duration: 1:07.

For more infomation >> Suzuki Swift - Duration: 1:07.

-------------------------------------------

H-King Focke-Wulf Fw-190 1200mm (47.2") EPO PNF Unboxing - Duration: 26:59.

Already Iam inlove with this beautiful bird and I cant wait to do the maiden flight and see it at low flybys. Oh yeah... Big salute to all RC lovers all over the world from Captain Blaž & Pilot Robert Slovenia. See you soon.

For more infomation >> H-King Focke-Wulf Fw-190 1200mm (47.2") EPO PNF Unboxing - Duration: 26:59.

-------------------------------------------

Should You Write a Catchy Title for Your Scientific Paper? - Duration: 8:16.

Hi.

I'm Karen McKee, retired scientist and author with another video about scientific writing.

Did you know that there is a group of Swedish scientists who have a running bet as to who

can publish the most papers before retirement with titles containing Bob Dylan quotes?

The paper that kicked off the contest was this one published in Nature Medicine in 1997.

"Nitric oxide and inflammation: the answer is blowing in the wind"

More papers with Dylan-inspired titles followed.

Are catchy titles like this a good idea?

In this video, I'll address this question and talk more broadly about what goes into

a good title for a scientific paper.

[music]

Successful authors put a lot of thought into writing their titles.

This is because the title of a paper is the single most important factor determining how

many people will find and eventually read that paper.

If a title doesn't sound interesting or relevant, people will pass the paper by.

On the other hand, a title that is thoughtfully crafted will attract readers.

A good title will also help convince a journal editor that the paper is worth considering.

But how do you come up with an effective and compelling title?

Well, there are a number of dos and don'ts when writing your title.

One admonition is to avoid unnecessary phrases such as "a study of" or "an investigation of"

Such phrases, which are more common in older papers, usually do nothing more than add to

the length of the title.

Today, journals usually limit the number of words or characters used in a title, so it

makes sense to omit unnecessary words.

You also want to avoid jargon, acronyms, and abbreviations in the title because only a

handful of experts will understand what these mean, as in this hypothetical example.

Although a few experts will understand that the acronym ADH stands for the enzyme alcohol

dehydrogenase, many potential readers will not.

Another mistake is to write a title that is too broad and does not convey what the paper found

For example, a title that just states the broad topic of the research:

Response of coastal wetlands to sea-level rise

Is this study about all coastal wetlands?

In all geographic locations?

Unless it's a review paper, probably not.

More importantly, this hypothetical title does not reveal what the study found.

Here is a title from one of my published papers:

Someone reading just the title knows that we specifically studied mangroves, a type

of coastal wetland, and conducted the work in the Caribbean Region.

The title also explains the key finding of the paper, which is that these mangroves adjust

their soil elevations in relation to sea level through biological, rather than just physical processes.

In other words, our findings were novel and of interest to others.

But what biological processes?

Exactly where does this adjustment take place?

You have to read the paper to find out.

That's what you want to do with your title.

Capture the reader's attention and provoke them to read your paper.

Another point that some experts mention is that you should avoid the use of question

marks, colons and hyphens in a title.

In general, it is better to state a clear finding instead of posing a question.

And use of colons or hyphens often means the title is too long.

However, such punctuation marks may not always be problematic.

One of my most highly cited papers has a question mark and a hyphen in the title.

Use of a question mark might be appropriate, for example, if your study's findings provided

evidence for a mechanism but could not demonstrate it conclusively.

In this study, we had strong but circumstantial evidence for the role of drought in causing

dieback of salt marshes.

The question mark acknowledges that we did not find the smoking gun, but did identify

a strong suspect.

But if you have a clear outcome, go with a declarative statement that conveys your key

finding.

Another common admonition is to avoid overly long titles with too much detail.

Some studies have shown that papers with short titles receive more citations than ones with

longer titles.

Papers with shorter titles may be easier to read and understand and, hence, attract more

readers.

It's also possible that authors of highly cited papers tend to craft more concise titles

or publish in journals restricting title length.

My recommendation is that you should not be aiming for a title with a specific word count,

but one that best fits your paper and that contains important keywords.

The reason you want to pay attention to keywords in titling your paper is because search engines

use the words in a document's title to assign its ranking in a search.

For example, here is the working title of a review paper I coauthored:

"The relative role of mangrove vegetation in maintenance of soil elevations within the

intertidal habitat"

Unless this is your field, it's unlikely that this title will convince you to download and

read this paper.

More importantly, that title lacks an important key phrase, which is sea level rise.

Here is the final title of our paper:

"How mangrove forests adjust to rising sea level"

This title is more attractive and shorter than the original and contains several search

terms that people are likely to use to find information on the topic of our paper.

OK.

Let's return to the topic of catchy titles and if they are a good idea.

Apparently, there are hundreds of scientific papers with allusions to song lyrics and literature.

Besides Dylan, Shakespeare, Lewis Carroll, and Star Trek are favorite sources of inspiration,

according to this study.

While catchy titles may sound clever or amusing, they probably shouldn't be used for a typical

scientific paper.

You've already heard the reasons why.

One reason is that not everyone will get the Bob Dylan quote or other saying you might

use in the title.

Another reason is that the extra words add to the title length.

The catchy title may not clearly convey the key finding of the paper

And finally, the catchy title often includes words that will not help readers find your

paper in an online search.

In the end, your goal in crafting a title for your paper is to condense your paper into

a single, brief statement that sends a clear message and simultaneously attracts readers.

To see how to distill your message down to a single sentence that can be used as a title,

see the video mentioned in the description.

Also, I've included some references to articles about titles of scientific articles at the

end of this video and in the description below the video.

I hope you find this information useful when you are writing your next scientific paper.

And don't forget to like my video if you found this helpful.

[music]

For more infomation >> Should You Write a Catchy Title for Your Scientific Paper? - Duration: 8:16.

-------------------------------------------

[FREE] Quavo x Lil Baby x Gunna Type Beat | ''24 Hours'' | Type Beat Trap/Rap Instrumental 2018 - Duration: 3:38.

Buy 1 Get 3 Free at: chrisvillebeats.com

For more infomation >> [FREE] Quavo x Lil Baby x Gunna Type Beat | ''24 Hours'' | Type Beat Trap/Rap Instrumental 2018 - Duration: 3:38.

-------------------------------------------

Mercedes-Benz C-Klasse Estate 180 K BlueEFFICIENCY automaat, navigatie, cruise control, - Duration: 1:09.

For more infomation >> Mercedes-Benz C-Klasse Estate 180 K BlueEFFICIENCY automaat, navigatie, cruise control, - Duration: 1:09.

-------------------------------------------

Acosta Tries to Explain His Vulgar Message to Former Trump Official With This PATHETIC Excuse - Duration: 4:06.

For more infomation >> Acosta Tries to Explain His Vulgar Message to Former Trump Official With This PATHETIC Excuse - Duration: 4:06.

-------------------------------------------

Hot Dog On A Stick™ | Pumpkin Funnel Cake Sticks | Food Review! 🌭🎃 - Duration: 3:22.

welcome to peep this out reviews with Ian K stay frosty

so we're here at Hot Dog on a Stick for today's review to take a look at their latest sweet treat

in the form of their all-new pumpkin funnel cake sticks and a sweet treat this most

definitely looks to be have a look at all the powdered sugar on the top of

these guys a nice size order here for $3.99 I must say basically what we've got

here our funnel cake battered sticks with pumpkin flavor naturally pumpkin

spice filled with cream and then topped off with plenty of powdered sugar and a

little bit of the vanilla drizzle it's supposed to have there but man it

definitely looks sweet and absolutely crispy made to order here at hot dog on

a stick and I have to say it looks really really great let's see if the

flavor delivers on these so a sweet treat definitely look at all of that

powdered sugar I can't stress enough how loaded this is here let's see if it

really delivers that pumpkin flavor here we go the pumpkin funnel cake sticks from

hot dog on a stick

try and get a little closer on that that vanilla cream is dense this is probably not

gonna sound right but it's almost like toothpaste type of dense it's really

really thick Wow nice pumpkin spice on this light

crispiness and again plenty of the powdered sugar let's go again these are awesome

straight out awesome one more time lemme turn this around keep that in focus for ya

it is all the way through with the cream on this one here and actually all that

powdered sugar is lighting it up nicely there the vanilla is just in the

background with plenty of pumpkin spice flavor on this pretty awesome for an

order of these but $3.99 and again super sweet really really good overall score

on this one I'm gonna have to go a solid 9 out of 10

guys the only difference with this that I think that would make it a bit better is

if they made these more like cannolis and made them a little larger believe it or not that would be

awesome but as it stands you have a really

nice order of these and if you want to tell them to go light on that sugar on

top there I probably recommend that for tea there unless you people want to go

into diabetic shock it is pretty crazy but very very awesome on these for sure

alright guys it's just the fast look in between projects right now for me

over here at hot dog on a stick definitely give these pumpkin spice

funnel cake sticks a shot actually that really really tasty I would recommend it

have you ever had anything like this before drop some comments down below

let me know if you have in the past I'm absolutely excited for Halloween this is

actually a really nice little Halloween time snack because the pumpkin flavor

may be posted at Thanksgiving but really really tasty so drop those comments down

below let me know and as always this is Ian K closing out a quickie episode

of peep this out I can always say brand new content can be found on my channel

every single week so while you stay tuned for that next review coming real

soon in the meantime stay frosty my first Hot Dog on a Stick review

channel and it's on something other than a hot dog we'll see about fixing that in

the near future alright guys until next time I'll talk

to you soon