An Giang info: Youtube daily report Oct 19 2018

THE FIRST CASE ON THE DOCKET THIS MORNING IS DAVID P. TROTTI V. RICK SCOTT, GOVERNOR, ET AL.. >> I AM PHILIP PADOVANO, HERE

WITH PETITIONER DAVID MATTHEW FUNDERBUNK. MISTER SALAMA WAS IN BOTH OF THE PROCEEDINGS IN THE DCA AND

CIRCUIT COURT. AFTER HEARING THE EVIDENCE IN THIS CASE THE TRIAL JUDGE SAID, QUOTE, THIS WAS SIMPLY AN EFFORT

TO CIRCUMVENT THE CONSTITUTION NOT TO SUPPORT THE DEFENDANT. JUDGE FOSTER RESIGNED BEFORE THE QUALIFYING IN THE GENERAL

ELECTION. GO BUT SET HIS RESIGNATION DATE 9 MONTHS IN THE FUTURE TO APPOINT JUST FOUR DAYS BEFORE THE END OF THE NATURAL

EXPIRATION OF HIS TERM AND THERE WAS NO REASON TO RESIGN IN THE FIRST PLACE. HE QUALIFIED FOR ANOTHER TERM.

>> LET ME CUT TO THE HEART OF WHAT WE ARE TALKING ABOUT. THE JURISPRUDENCE OF THIS BOARD HAS INTERPRETED THE RESIGNATION

AS BEING EFFECTIVE WHEN ACCEPTED. >> CORRECT. >> IN THIS CASE WHAT WE HAVE TO

DO IS A NUMBER OF CASES AS WE GET TO THE POINT. >> LET ME TELL YOU WHY. LET ME START WITH POINTS THAT WE

AGREE. WE AGREE THERE IS A BODY OF CASE LAW IN THIS COURT THAT SAYS RESIGNATION IS EFFECTIVE,

TENDERED AND ACCEPTED BY THE GOVERNOR. WE ALSO AGREED THIS COURT HAD ENCOURAGED LAWYERS, JUDGES TO

RESIGN IN THE FUTURE SO THE WORK OF THE NOMINATING COMMISSION CAN BE DONE SO THERE WILL BE A SEAMLESS TRANSMISSION IN THE

SERVICE -- >> THERE IS A HOLE IN THE CONSTITUTION. >> WHAT HAPPENS.

>> THESE CASES BASICALLY WERE FOUNDED ON THE PRINCIPLE OF GOOD FAITH THAT RESIGNATION WAS GOING TO BE A RESIGNATION IN THE

FUTURE. EVERY ONE OF THE CASES YOU'RE REFERRING TO THE EFFECTIVE DATE OCCURRED BEFORE THE GENERAL

ELECTION. THE FIRST CASE IT OCCURRED, AND THE RESIGNATION IS BEFORE THE QUALIFYING, BUT AFTER THE

QUALIFYING HAD CONCLUDED. IT WAS SOMETHING ON THE ORDER OF JULY 31ST OR EVEN SEPTEMBER. BECAUSE THERE ARE 6 OR 7 MONTHS

OF NOBODY IN THE OFFICE, AND THERE IS AN UNREASONABLE VACANCY. THIS DETERMINED, THE COURT

DETERMINED THE CASE UNREASONABLE VACANCY. IT IS ALL INVOLVED IN THAT CATEGORY.

WHAT I'M SAYING TO YOU IS I DON'T THINK THE COURT NEEDS TO MODIFY CASE LAW. THE COURT NEEDS TO DECIDE THOSE

CASES, AND THE COURT HAD IN MIND TO MAKE A MOCKERY OF THIS BY RESIGNING A DAY BEFORE THE END OF THE TERM, AND SWALLOWED UP AN

ENTIRE ELECTION. I DON'T THINK THAT IS WHAT THE COURT HAD IN MIND. >> WHAT THE COURT HAS IN MIND --

IT IS A QUESTION OF TRYING TO APPLY THE CONSTITUTION. >> THE CASE WAS DIRECTLY CONTROLLED BY THE COURT DECIDING

-- >> THE CONSTITUTION CHANGED THIS. >> THE CONSTITUTION DID CHANGE

BUT NOT MATERIALLY, AND DID CHANGE IN SOME RESPECTS. THE CONSTITUTION CHANGED IN RESPECT FOR AND MOST NOTABLY WE

NO LONGER ELECT JUDGES BACK THEN. WE WERE ELECTING FLORIDA SUPREME COURT JUSTICES.

CONSTITUTION CHANGED IN THE RESPECT THAT WE NOW HAVE A LONGER PERIOD, THAT CHANGED SEVERAL TIMES SINCE THEN.

THE MATERIAL PART OF SPECTER HAS NOT CHANGED. IF THERE IS AN ELECTION THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE MUST BE HONORED

AND WE MUST HAVE THE ELECTION, YOU HAVE A CASE WHERE THERE WAS NO REASON NOT TO HOLD AN ELECTION.

>> UNDER THIS SCENARIO THAT WE SANCTIONS AND AUTHORIZED, THERE WAS GOING TO BE NO PHYSICAL VACANCY.

>> UNLIKE WHAT WAS OBTAINED HERE, SMALL AND SOME PHYSICAL VACANCY SO THAT IS A DISTINCTION.

>> I CAN SEE THAT IS A DIFFERENCE. >> LET ME ASK YOU A HYPOTHETICAL.

THERE WAS A CIRCUIT JUDGE, THE TERM EXPIRING IN JANUARY 2021. A CIRCUIT JUDGE DECIDED SHE WANTED TO LEAVE OFFICE BEFORE

THE EXPIRATION OF HER TERM. ABOUT TWO YEARS BEFORE EXPIRATION OF HER TERM BUT SHE ALSO DECIDED SHE WOULD LIKE HER

SUCCESSOR TO BE CHOSEN BY ELECTION OTHER THAN BY APPOINTMENT. SO NOW IN 2018 BEFORE THE START

OF QUALIFYING PERIOD, THE FIRST TUESDAY AFTER THE FIRST MONDAY IN JANUARY 2019. UNDER YOUR THEORY OF OUR

CONSTITUTION, WHAT WILL HAPPEN? >> IT WOULD BE AN ELECTION AND IF I UNDERSTAND CORRECTLY THAT IS PRECISELY WHAT HAPPENED.

>> THE JUDGE COULD DECIDE IF THERE'S GOING TO BE A SPECIAL ELECTION UNDER THE WAY THE CONSTITUTION IS NOW.

>> DECIDING TO FOLLOW THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE AND HOLD AN ELECTION IN A LITTLE ELECTION YEAR, DECIDING TO TRY TO THWART

THAT. >> IT IS A SPECIAL ELECTION. >> JUST A SERVANT OF THIS COURT, HE DECIDED --

>> I'M NOT CRITICIZING. I'M TRYING TO EXPLORE WHERE YOUR THEORY OF THIS TAKES US. WHAT WAS INVOLVED IN SPECTOR WAS

A SPECIAL ELECTION THAT WAS SET AT THE TIME OF REGULARLY SCHEDULED ELECTION BUT STILL A SPECIAL ELECTION FOR THAT SEAT,

CORRECT? >> YES. >> THE SCENARIO INVOLVED A SPECIAL ELECTION FOR A CIRCUIT

COURT, CORRECT? >> I MISSED THE LAST POINT. >> THE SCENARIO I DESCRIBED, THE HYPOTHETICAL -- THERE SHOULD BE

A SPECIAL ELECTION, THE CIRCUIT COURT. >> IT IS A DIFFERENCE, FOR EXAMPLE A CIRCUIT JUDGE MIGHT

ANNOUNCE UNTIL EVERYBODY KNOWS THAT TO BE OPEN. ONE MIGHT CHARACTERIZE THAT AS A CONSCIOUS CHOICE ON THE PART OF

THE JUDGE TO FAVOR AN ELECTION. THIS IS AN ELECTION YEAR. >> A RESPONSE TO MY HYPOTHETICAL, YOU ARE SAYING

BASICALLY THE JUDGE CAN DECIDE THERE IS GOING TO BE A SPECIAL ELECTION TO FILL OUT A TWO YEAR PORTION OF THE JUDGE'S TERM,

CORRECT? >> PERHAPS I DON'T UNDERSTAND THE HYPOTHETICAL. >> WHAT DON'T YOU UNDERSTAND?

I AM TRYING TO BE CLEAR AND SOMETIMES I FAIL. >> I'M NOT LAYING THAT ON YOU. IN ANY EVENT WE HAVE A GENERAL

ELECTION HERE. THIS IS A GENERAL ELECTION YEAR IN 2018. >> THAT WAS THE CASE IN SPECTOR

BUT IT WAS NONETHELESS A SPECIAL ELECTION FOR THAT PARTICULAR SEAT. IT WAS NOT -- THE TERM IS NOT

UP. THERE WAS NOT GOING TO BE AN ELECTION FOR THAT SEAT AND THE SCENARIO I GAVE YOU IT WOULD BE

A SPECIAL ELECTION. IF I UNDERSTAND CORRECTLY THE JUDGE CAN DECIDE, AS IN SPECTOR, THAT THERE WILL BE A SPECIAL

ELECTION. >> I THINK I UNDERSTAND YOU BETTER AND I'M NOT SURE I WOULD ANSWER THAT, IT IS A DIFFERENT

SITUATION. >> HOW IS IT DIFFERENT FROM SPECTOR? >> SPECTOR ACTUALLY WAS AGING

OUT 20 DAYS AFTER. HE WOULDN'T -- >> THE TERM -- BY MANDATORY RETIREMENT, THE TERM WAS NOT UP.

>> THAT IS CORRECT. >> A SPECIAL ELECTION WOULD BE FILLED BY ELECTION, CORRECT? >> THERE WAS A GENERAL ELECTION

THAT YEAR. I'M NOT SURE WHAT THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE -- THAT WAS AN ELECTION YEAR.

THERE WAS IN FACT A GENERAL ELECTION THAT YEAR. CANDIDATES FOR THE SUPREME COURT, ARTHUR ENGLAND DID

QUALIFY FOR THAT, TRIED TO. >> LET ME ASK YOU THIS. IN OUR CASE, THE LETTER WAS SENT BY JUDGE FOSTER PRIOR TO THE

QUALIFICATION, CORRECT? IT WAS TO HIS TERM, BY HIS TERMS WAS TO END AFTER THE QUALIFYING PERIOD.

>> CORRECT. >> WHAT WOULD BE THE RESULT IF HE HAD SENT HIS LETTER AWAY, A DAY, A WEEK, WHATEVER, AFTER THE

QUALIFYING PERIOD, WOULD THERE BE AN ELECTION YEAR? OR WE STILL FIGHTING ABOUT WHETHER OR NOT THERE WOULD BE?

>> THAT WOULD CLEARLY BE AN ELECTION. THAT GOES -- >> WE STILL GET TO THE POINT

WHERE A JUDGE CAN, BY THE DATE OF THE LETTER THAT IS SENT TO THE GOVERNOR, DETERMINE WHETHER THERE IS GOING TO BE AN ELECTION

OR APPOINTMENT? >> THAT IS CORRECT. WHAT I AM SAYING IS I DON'T THINK IT REFLECTS WELL ON THE

JUDICIARY, CONSISTENT WITH THE GENERAL, THE RURAL ANNOUNCED INSPECTOR TO DELIBERATELY RE-SIGN BEFORE THE QUALIFYING

BEGINS. KNOWING THAT WILL CREATE AN APPOINTMENT WHEN IN FACT YOU INTEND TO STAY FOR THE ENTIRE

YEAR. >> LET ME ASK YOU THIS. WHAT YOUR VIEW IS A REASONABLE VACANCY?

>> THE COURT -- >> IF HE SENT THIS LETTER, WOULD IT BE BY APPOINTMENT ACCORDING TO YOUR THEORY?

>> BY APPOINTMENT. >> THE JUDGE COULD DO THAT SUBJECTIVELY TO MAKE IT AN APPOINTMENT.

>> YES. >> YOUR CONCERN IS NOT REALLY WITH THE SUBJECTIVE INTENT BUT WITH THE LENGTH OF TIME.

>> THAT IS CORRECT. I THINK THAT IS CORRECT. >> LOOKING AT THE 2006 UNANIMOUS ADVISORY OPINION FOR THIS COURT,

IT SAYS UNDER PRIOR CASE LAW VACANCY OCCURRED IN THAT CASE, THE GOVERNOR RECEIVED AND ACCEPTED STEVENSON'S RESIGNATION

AND THAT IS THE POINT OF LAW THAT YOU AGREE WITH. >> THAT IS CORRECT. >> THAT GOES ON TO SAY BECAUSE

THE QUALIFYING PERIOD HAD NOT COMMENCED UNDER THIS COURT'S DECISION, THE ELECTION PROCESS HAS NOT YET BEGUN, THIS ARTICLE

5 SECTION 11 BE CONTROLLED, THE VACANCY SHALL BE FILLED BY APPOINTMENT. >> THAT IS ALL CORRECT.

>> IF WE WERE TO FOLLOW THAT, THEN THIS WOULD BE AN APPOINTED POSITION. >> THE DIFFERENCE AND IT IS A

BIG DIFFERENCES THAT INVOLVES AN ACTUAL VACANCY, LONG-TERM, FORGET HOW LONG. >> THAT WASN'T PART OF THE

REASONING, WAS IT? >> IN THE PREVIOUS CASE IT INVOLVED JUDGE FULLER, TALKING ABOUT THE FACT IT HAD TO BE

DIDN'T -- >> IT WAS A 7 MONTH VACANCY. >> YES. BECAUSE OTHERWISE AN

UNREASONABLE VACANCY, TO GO BACK TO YOUR EARLIER QUESTION I DON'T THINK THE COURT DEFINED WHAT AN UNREASONABLE VACANCY WAS.

I THINK THAT IS A GOOD ARGUMENT FOR SAYING THAT THE COURT DOESN'T NEED TO DEFINE A SHORT TIME.

>> LET ME ASK ABOUT THE PRACTICALITY OF THIS CASE AND PRECEDENT. OBVIOUSLY I AGREED WITH YOU,

YOUR DISSENT IN THE PRIOR ABCA13 CASE. THE HALLWAY OUR LAW HAS DEVELOPED INCLUDING WHETHER THE

VACANCY OR THE LETTER IS ACCEPTED BEFORE THE QUALIFYING PERIOD AND WE ARE RIGHT AFTER, CREATES AN ARBITRARINESS, SO TO

ME I SEE THAT THIS, WHETHER IT IS ALL LEGISLATIVELY, CONSTITUTIONALLY OR BY THE COURT BUT IN THIS SITUATION IT DOES

CONCERN ME THAT WE HAVE THE ALTERNATIVES WE HAVE A JUDGE IN THE WINGS WHO WAS, WENT THROUGH A JUDICIAL NOMINATING COMMISSION

PROCESS, WE CAN ASSUME OTHER QUALIFIED PEOPLE. AND APPOINTING HIM, AND THE SAME ABCA13, NOBODY ELSE PUT IN FOR

THE SEAT PRESUMABLY, RELYING ON PRECEDENT. IT CONCERNS ME FROM A PRACTICAL POINT THAT THE CHOICES HERE, AT

LEAST HERE, GOING FORWARD MAY BE DIFFERENT, WE SHOULD STICK WITH OUR PRESIDENT AND LET THIS GO BY APPOINTMENT AND PROSPECT OF THE,

DEPENDING, MAKE SURE THIS DOESN'T CONTINUE TO HAPPEN. WHAT DO YOU SAY ABOUT THE FACT OF THE POLICIES IN FAVOR OF

ELECTIONS THERE WASN'T ANY ELECTION HERE. >> WHAT I SAY IS THERE WAS AN ELECTION.

OF THE CONSTITUTION CALLS FOR ANY ELECTION IT CALLS FOR ANY ELECTION WHETHER ONE PERSON QUALIFIES ARE 10 PEOPLE QUALIFY

AND ALSO SAY THAT THERE IS PROVISION IN FLORIDA LAW THAT SAYS WHAT HAPPENS WHEN ONLY ONE PERSON QUALIFIES, THE PERSON

VOTED FOR HIMSELF OR HERSELF AND -- >> I SAYING THE REALITY IS WE HAD ONE PROCESS THAT WAS A FULL

PROCESS AND ANOTHER, I WOULD ASSUME THERE ARE MORE PEOPLE IN THE CIRCUIT. >> THAT IS RIGHT.

THE ANSWER TO YOUR BROADER QUESTION AND GETS TO A PROBLEM IN THIS CASE, ADVOCATING FOR ELECTIONS AND YET THERE WON'T BE

A CONTESTED ELECTION. THERE IS AN ELECTION, THERE WON'T BE A CONTESTED ELECTION. I UNDERSTAND THAT.

THAT IS A CONCERN THE FIRST DISTRICT EXPRESSED. I THINK THAT ONCE THIS PROBLEM IS RESOLVED, IF WE ADHERE TO

WHAT WE SAID IF THERE ISN'T MACHINERY FOR ELECTING, WE FOLLOW THAT BECAUSE THAT IS THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE.

OF LAWYERS GET THE IDEA THE COURT IS WILLING TO SUPPORT THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO AN ELECTION, THIS ISN'T GOING TO

HAPPEN SO OFTEN. IT HAPPENED EVERY ELECTION CYCLE. IN THE FIRST MATTHEW FUNDERBUNK

CASE THERE WAS NOT MUCH INTEREST IN ELECTIONS. >> YOU ARE CONSUMING A REBUTTAL TIME.

>> I DO NOT. >> THANK YOU FOR REMINDING ME. >> ON BEHALF OF GOVERNOR SCOTT, AND THE CHIEF DEPUTY COUNSEL.

>> A FEW THINGS THAT CONCERN ME, AND THE PAST JURISPRUDENCE. VACANCY OCCURRING AT THE TIME THE RESIGNATION IS ACCEPTED.

IN THIS CASE, MORE RECENT CASES WERE ONLY A MATTER OF A DAY OR TWO DAYS OR THREE DAYS, THERE SEEMS TO BE SOMETHING UNINTENDED

WITH THAT, THAT SOMEBODY, MAYBE A MONTH OR WHATEVER, IS THAT TO THE CONSTITUTION OR SOMETHING THAT THE COURT HAS CREATED?

WHEN THE VACANCY OCCURS? >> IT IS LONG SETTLED LAW. SPECTOR VERSUS GLISSON ANNOUNCED THE TIME OF THE RESIGNATION IS

TENDERED AND ACCEPTED BY THE GOVERNOR AND CONSISTENT WITH 114 OF THE FLORIDA STATUTES WHICH IS RESIGNATION OCCURS WHEN THE

RESIGNATION TAKES PLACE. >> WHAT CASES WE TALKED ABOUT AN ACTUAL VACANCY? JUDGE FOSTER WHO COULDN'T SERVE

ANOTHER TERM HAS BEEN SITTING AND CONTINUE TO SIT UNTIL A COUPLE DAYS BEFORE. >> IN THE 1992 ADVISORY OPINION

INVOLVING JUDGE FULLER, MORE SPECIFICALLY 2006 ADVISORY OPINION THE SHERIFF IN JUDICIAL VACANCIES ADVISORY OPINION FOR

2006, INVOLVED A RESIGNATION TENDERED BEFORE THE QUALIFYING PERIOD AND EFFECTIVE AFTER THE QUALIFYING PERIOD AND IN THAT

CASE AS WELL THE COURT HELD TO ITS PRECEDENT THAT THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE VACANCY WHEN IT IS ACCEPTED RATHER THAN THE DATE IT

BECOMES EFFECTIVE. >> IN THAT CASE THERE WAS A TRUE -- HE WAS RESIGNING EFFECTIVE MAY 31ST SO THERE WAS A 7 MONTH

VACANCY. AND ACTUAL VACANCY. THE OTHER QUESTION I HAVE, I KNOW I STOPPED YOU AT THE

BEGINNING, IS THIS IDEA, I THINK IT CAME FROM ADVISORY OPINION. OF THE RESIGNATION BECOMES ACCEPTED BEFORE THE BEGINNING OF

THE QUALIFYING PERIOD, IT GOES BY APPOINTMENT. IT IS AFTER THE QUALIFYING PERIOD BY ELECTION AND I BELIEVE

THAT WAS AN ADVISORY OPINION, WHAT IS THE RATIONALE THAT THE COURT WOULD HAVE ENUNCIATED WHICH SEEMS TO BE A VERY

ARBITRARY DEADLINE WHEN YOU KNOW THERE ARE MONTHS AHEAD. AND SINCE WE ARE CONCERNED ABOUT THE ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE IF

THE CONSTITUTION DOESN'T SPEAK TO IT DOES THAT MAKE SENSE TO YOU? >> LET ME ANSWER YOUR QUESTIONS

AND TURN. THE LENGTH OF THE ACTUAL VACANCY, PICKING UP ON SOMETHING JUSTICE LAWSON MENTIONED IN THE

EARLIER QUESTIONING, AS PART OF ITS RATIONALE IN THESE CASES AS TO THE LENGTH OF THE ACTUAL VACANCY, SPECIFICALLY IN THE

2002 ADVISORY OPINION WHEN THIS COURT RETIRED JUDGE HARLEY ON THE LEON COUNTY COURT DURING THE QUALIFYING PERIOD THIS COURT

DETERMINED THE SEAT SHOULD BE FILLED BEFORE THE ELECTIONS PROCESS, NOTWITHSTANDING JUDGE HARLEY WAS INVOLUNTARILY RETIRED

EFFECTIVE AT MIDNIGHT THE SAME DAY RESULTING IN AN 8 MONTH ACTUAL VACANCY IN OFFICE. NOTWITHSTANDING THE 8 MONTH

ACTUAL VACANCY THIS COURT SAID THE ELECTION PROCESS SHOULD CONTINUE BECAUSE THE ELECTION PROCESS HAD BEGUN.

EMPLOYMENT HAPPENED IN CASES WITH 7 MONTH ACTUAL VACANCIES, ELECTIONS HAPPENED WITH 8 MONTH VACANCIES.

>> SOUNDS TO ME LIKE JURISPRUDENCE CREATED SOMETHING NOT VERY JURISPRUDENTIAL HE SOUND IS WHAT I'M SEEING HERE.

THAT IS MY POINT. WE HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO MAKE SURE GOING FORWARD THAT THE SYSTEM CAN'T BE MANIPULATED.

SEVERAL JUDGES IN THEIR HEART BELIEVE, OVER ELECTION BUT THE QUESTION IS VOTERS HAVE REJECTED THAT FOR TRIAL JUDGES AND

CREATED BY JURISPRUDENCE, UNINTENTIONAL WHOLE, WHERE THE SYSTEM CAN BE MANIPULATED. >> AS WE LAID OUT THE BRIEF THE

CONSTITUTION PROVIDES WHEN VACANCIES OCCUR IN OFFICE, VACANCIES ARE FILLED BY THE GOVERNOR AND THAT IS WHAT THE

CONSTITUTION SAYS. THE COURT IN THE 2002 ADVISORY OPINION IS EXCEPTION TO THAT. AND JUSTICE LEWIS DISSENTED FROM

THAT OPINION, THE ELECTION PROCESS, THAT LED US TO THIS AREA. THE POLICY RATIONALE, THAT WAS A

VACANCY AFTER THE QUALIFYING PERIOD. THE EVE OF AN ELECTION. UNDER THOSE CIRCUMSTANCES IT

DOESN'T MAKE SENSE TO A POINT TO NULLIFY AN ONGOING ELECTION. THE 2002 CASE THE VACANCY QUALIFYING IN THE ELECTION

PROCESS SHOULD CONTINUE. AND THE VACANCY OCCURRED THE QUALIFYING PERIOD TO THE VACANCY, APRIL RESIGNATION, AND

THERE WERE CANDIDATES WHO WANTED TO RUN FOR THAT OFFICE AND THIS COURT THAT THE CONSTITUTION REQUIRES VACANCIES TO BE FILLED

BY THE GOVERNOR AND QUALIFYING PERIOD HASN'T HAPPENED YET IN THE ELECTION PROCESS IS DONE AND THE 2008 OPINION VACANCY

OCCURRED DURING THE QUALIFYING PERIOD AND THEY SAID WE WON'T LOOK AT FACTS SPECIFIC TO EACH ELECTION CYCLE TO DETERMINE HOW

THE PROCESS SHOULD BE CARRIED OUT. WHEN DID THE VACANCY OCCUR? WAS IT BEFORE OR AFTER THE

BEGINNING OF THE STATUTORY QUALIFYING PERIOD? WE DON'T HAVE TO LOOK AT THE LENGTH OF THE VACANCY, SPECIFIC

NEEDS OF ANY TRIAL COURT, SUBJECTIVE MOTIVATIONS OF THE RETIRING JUDGE. WAS IT BEFORE OR AFTER THE

QUALIFYING? THERE IS AT LEAST ONE RATIONALE FOR THAT APPROACH BEING TAKEN. >> IS THERE A PROBLEM WITH THE

LANGUAGE THAT SAYS THE VACANCY OCCURS WHEN YOU SEAL A LETTER AS OPPOSED TO THE DATE THAT YOU INDICATED IN THAT LETTER, YOU

WERE ACTUALLY LEAVING, RESULTING IN A REAL VACANCY AS OPPOSED TO THEORETICAL? >> I DON'T THINK WE HAVE A

DISAGREEMENT WITH OUR FRIENDS AS TO THAT LINE OF PRECEDENT AND THAT HAS EXISTED SINCE SPECTOR VERSUS GLISSON AND IS CONSISTENT

WITH LANGUAGE OF ARTICLE 10 SECTION 3 IN CHAPTER 114 OF THE FLORIDA STATUTE AND WHAT THAT ALLOWS IS THE JUDICIAL

NOMINATING PROCESS TO BEGIN, TO RESULT IN NOMINATIONS AND APPOINTMENT FOR A SEAMLESS TRANSITION.

>> ON THE OTHER HAND, CIRCUIT AND COURT ACCOUNT ELECTIONS ARE DIFFERENT FROM THE APPELLATE PROCESS BUT IN AN APPELLATE

SITUATION, GENERALLY YOU GET, IF SOMEONE GETS TO THE END OF THEIR TERM SUCH AS JUDGE FOSTER WOULD HAVE AT THE END OF HIS AGING

OUT, THE PROCESS STARTS, THE CONSTITUTION REQUIRES AT LEAST 60 DAYS BEFORE THE ACTUAL VACANCY.

WHY ISN'T THAT JUST AS GOOD A PROCESS TO HAVE A CIRCUIT COURT SITUATION? >> I THINK THERE ARE DIFFERENT

POLICY ARGUMENTS WHAT A BETTER SYSTEM WAS. JUSTICE. THEY -- THE CLARIFYING AMENDMENT IS ONE WAY TO ADDRESS

THIS. AS A MATTER OF CURRENT PRECEDENT AND CURRENT CONSTITUTIONAL LANGUAGE I DON'T THINK THERE'S

ANY DISPUTE THE VACANCY OCCURRED BEFORE THE QUALIFYING PERIOD AND IN ANY SUCH CIRCUMSTANCE VACANCIES BEFORE CANDIDATE IS

QUALIFIED ARE FILLED BY THE APPOINTMENT PROCESS. >> WHAT IS THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH'S VIEW?

IF WE HAVE A CIRCUMSTANCE, THIS COURT WOULD SAY WE CREATED A LOW, JURISPRUDENCE THE TALKS, A THEORETICAL THING.

IT IS NOT A REAL THING. CERTAINLY YOU CAN'T STOP JUDGES OR OTHER OFFICERS FROM RESIDING. IT IS A PART OF WHAT HAPPENS.

THE CONSTITUTION DOES NOT PROVIDE FOR A YEAR'S WAIT TIME. IT IS NOT CONSTITUTIONALLY ENSHRINED.

IT IS SOMETHING WE ALLOWED. WHAT WOULD BE THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH'S VIEW IF A COURT WOULD SAY THE VACANCY, IT OCCURS, WHEN

IT IS TENDERED AND ACCEPTED AND INDIVIDUAL JUDGES DO NOT HAVE THE POWER TO SUBVERT THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE EXPRESSED IN THE

CONSTITUTION. IT IS NOT WHAT WE WANT OR WHAT US LAWYERS ONCE. IT IS WHAT THE CONSTITUTION SAYS

AND ALTHOUGH I MAY PREFER AS MANY DO A MERIT RETENTION SYSTEM WE DON'T HAVE IT FOR TRIAL JUDGES.

WHAT WOULD BE THE EXECUTIVE'S RESPONSE TO AN OPINION OR THOUGHT OR AN ARGUMENT THAT WOULD SAY WE SHOULD NOT LET

JUDGES OR POLITICIANS MANIPULATE WHAT THE CONSTITUTION CLEARLY SET FORTH, THAT IT OCCURS WHEN TENDERED AND ACCEPTED.

>> TWO RESPONSES TO THAT. ONE MORE ON THE LAW AND ONE FROM PRACTICAL EXPERIENCE. ON THE LAW THE CONSTITUTION DOES

PROVIDE A MERIT SELECTION PROCESS TO FILL VACANCIES. ARTICLE 5 SECTION 11. THAT IS THE CIRCUMSTANCE HERE,

TO FILL A VACANCY IN OFFICE FOR A LIMITED TERM FOLLOWED BY ELECTION FOR A FULL TERM. THE MORE PRACTICAL CONSEQUENCES,

WE HAVE NOT SEEN ANY FROM MISTER DAVID P. TROTTI V. RICK SCOTT, GOVERNOR, ET AL. ABOUT WHAT WILL HE IS ASKING THE COURT TO ADOPT

THAT WOULD NOT ALLOW A JUDGE TO RESIGN IN A WAY THAT WOULD ENSURE AN APPOINTMENT OR AN ELECTION OF HIS OR HER

SUCCESSOR. IF THIS COURT WERE TO SAY -- >> DOESN'T MEAN WE ARE TALKING IN TERMS OF WHAT IS THEORETICAL.

IT IS NOT REALLY A VACANCY. THE LETTER SAYS I'M NOT GOING TO LEAVE UNTIL THE DAY BEFORE THE TERM EXPIRES.

>> IF THIS COURT WERE TO SAY THE VACANCY CANNOT BE BEFORE THE GENERAL ELECTION. >> YOU CAN'T FIX IT IF YOU WANT

TO RESIGN, GO AHEAD AND RESIGN. THE TERMS OF THE RESIGNATION BECOME A FACTOR AS THE CONSTITUTION SAYS, WHEN ACCEPTED

BY THE EXECUTIVE. >> THAT WAS SOMETHING MISTER DAVID P. TROTTI V. RICK SCOTT, GOVERNOR, ET AL. SUGGESTED ON

PAGE 30 OF HIS BRIEF, RESIGNATIONS EFFECTIVE IN THE FUTURE ARE UNCONSTITUTIONAL, THAT WOULD BE A DRAMATIC

DEPARTURE FROM THIS COURT'S PRECEDENT. >> I DON'T KNOW. WHAT PROHIBITS THAT?

>> I DON'T BELIEVE IT DOES, I DON'T BELIEVE ANYTHING IN THE CONSTITUTION DOES THAT. THE PETITIONER SUGGESTED THAT ON

PAGE 30 OF HIS BRIEF THAT THE COURT MIGHT DECIDE RESIGNATIONS EFFECTIVE TOO FAR IN THE FUTURE ARE UNCONSTITUTIONAL BUT THOSE

HAVE HAPPENED BEFORE. >> IT WOULD BE EFFECTIVE AS THE DAY WE GET IT. TO ME IT IS AN AFFRONT TO THE

PEOPLE OF FLORIDA TO HAVE JUDGES THAT CAN MANIPULATE THE HEART OF WHO WE ARE AS A DEMOCRACY AND I THINK WITH THE TRIAL JUDGE HAD

TO SAY IS THAT IS WHAT THIS IS DOING AND I LOOKING TO SEE IF THERE IS NOT SOME OTHER LEGALLY SOUND BETTER WAY.

>> JUST SO I CAN UNDERSTAND, JUSTICE LEWIS, YOUR SUGGESTION IS A JUDGE WANTS TO RESIGN, THAT RESIGNATION MUST BE EFFECTIVE

IMMEDIATELY, CANNOT BE DELAYED. IF THE RESIGNATION OF JUDGE FOSTER HAPPENED IMMEDIATELY IN APRIL, THEN I DON'T THINK THERE

IS ANY QUESTION THAT VACANCY WOULD HAVE BEEN FILLED BY APPOINTMENT. >> MY PROBLEM IS THE CHARADE

BEING PLAYED, HE'S NOT REALLY RESIGNING. >> WHAT THE PROBLEM WITH SUCH A COOL BE IT WOULD MAKE EVERY

RESIGNATION EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY, YOU TURN IN THE RESIGNATION AS IT IS EFFECTIVE, THAT WOULD ESSENTIALLY GUARANTEE

A TWO OR THREE MONTHS PHYSICAL VACANCY BEFORE THE PROCESS, THE MERIT SELECTION PROCESS CAN DO ITS WORK.

>> ABSOLUTELY RIGHT, A PRACTICAL MATTER AND IT COULD BE A 5 OR 6 MONTHS VACANCY. >> WE HAVE SENIOR JUDGES IN THE

LEGISLATURE IS PROVIDING THOSE AND THERE ARE HUNDREDS OF SENIOR JUDGES AROUND THE STATE, THERE IS NOT A SENIOR JUDGE -- WHY NOT

PLUG THOSE IN UNTIL YOU NEED? >> THAT WOULD BE CONTRARY TO A NUMBER OF OPINION SUGGESTING JUDGES SHOULD RESIGN EFFECTIVE

IN THE FUTURE TO ALLOW FOR A SEAMLESS TRANSITION. >> NOT SURE THERE IS A REASON, THEY ARE OVERWORKED OR CAN'T DO

THIS. AFTER 20 YEARS, WATCHING WHAT IS HAPPENING, WHAT IS GOING ON WITH THE TRIAL COURT SYSTEM, I CAN'T

SEE, AND MORE THAN ADEQUATELY APPROVAL SENIOR JUDGES THAT COME THROUGH CONFERENCES. AND PAGES AND PAGES OF THEM.

OUR CONCERN AS PEOPLE THINK THIS IS A LAUGHABLE SITUATION. ONLY LAWYERS BUT THEY VACANCY WHEN THE LETTER COMES IN BUT YOU

DON'T HAVE A VACANCY UNTIL 10 MONTHS LATER BECAUSE ONE JUDGE DECIDED THAT IS WHAT HE OR SHE IS GOING TO DO.

>> IF THIS COURT WERE TO SAY JUDGE FOSTER'S RESIGNATION IS EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY AS TO APRIL 23RD WHEN IT WAS ACCEPTED

BY GOVERNOR SCOTT THE RESULT OF THIS CASE WOULD BE ON OTHER GROUNDS IN THE PROCESS? >> TRYING TO FIND IN THE FLORIDA

CONSTITUTION. THAT IS WHAT WE ARE TALKING ABOUT. >> I DON'T KNOW.

IS IT POSSIBLE FOR SOMEONE TO WITHDRAW THE RESIGNATION? >> I CHANGED MY MIND, I STILL HAVE 6 MONTHS.

>> UNDER THE COURT'S PRECEDENT IT IS POSSIBLE TO WITHDRAW A RESIGNATION UNTIL THE POINT IT HAS BEEN ACCEPTED BY THE

GOVERNOR. >> HOW DOES THE GOVERNOR ACCEPT THE RESIGNATION? BY CONVENING THE JUDICIAL

NOMINATING COMMISSION, I ACCEPT YOUR LETTER OF RESIGNATION? >> IT IS A WRITTEN RESIGNATION AND SEPARATE CORRESPONDENCE

ASKING THE JUDICIAL NOMINATING COMMISSION. >> THE GOVERNOR CONVENES AND IF NOMINATED.

>> INSPECTOR VERSUS GLISTEN AND JUSTICE URBAN'S RESIGNATION, AND IT IS IRREVOCABLE. AND IT IS PROPERLY DEEMED

IRREVOCABLE. >> ON THAT, A JUDICIAL CANDIDATE NOMINATED, AS A COURT JUDGE. IF WE AGREE, AND WHAT JUSTICE

LEWIS SUGGESTED, GOING WITH THE FIRST DISTRICT, WOULD HAVE TO RUN FOR ELECTION IN 2020. >> IF THE GOVERNOR ANNOUNCED HIS

INTENT TO APPOINT COUNTY JUDGE LESTER BEST TO PROCEED. >> FOR A YEAR, DOING THE MATH. >> UNTIL THE NEXT GENERAL

ELECTION MORE THAN A YEAR, AND AUGUST PRESUMABLY. >> WE UNDERSTAND, THAT APPEARS TO OCCUR FOR MANIPULATION,

MOTIVATED CONTENTIONS OCCUR IN EVEN NUMBERED YEARS. WHEN THE VACANCY OCCURS IN AN ODD NUMBER OF YEARS, HAVE TO

EXPLAIN WHY MERIT SELECTION AND OTHERS, THERE IS NO QUESTION THOSE SEATS ARE FILLED BY MERIT SELECTION.

IS THAT CORRECT? >> THAT IS RIGHT. THIS SEEMS TO COME UP IN AN EVEN NUMBER OF YEARS.

>> IN CASES RECENTLY WHERE EVERYBODY CAN'T EVEN RUN AGAIN, THESE SITUATIONS HAVE COME UP AND UNQUALIFIED, BUT

INTENTIONALLY LEAVING TWO OR THREE DAYS BEFORE THE END OF THE TERM. WE HAVEN'T HAD THAT.

>> THE CASES IN RECENT YEARS ARE ALL THAT SITUATION. >> WE HAVE JUDGES, IN THE END OF DECEMBER AFTER THE CAPER.

IN THOSE CASES THE ELECTION PROCESS. >> GOES BACK TO WHAT JUSTICE LEWIS DISSENTED TO SAY WHERE DO

WE COME UP WITH THAT ONE SO WE PRINT ANOTHER ARBITRARY DISTINCTION. >> WHAT WE WOULD ASK THIS COURT

TO SAY CONSISTENT WITH THE 2006 ADVISORY OPINION, DO ANY ATTORNEYS SUCH AS MISTER PARIENTE 9 WANT TO RUN FOR THIS

OFFICE, THE SCENE WILL BE UP IN TWO YEARS. IT IS A LIMITED INITIAL APPOINTMENT AND THEY COULD RUN

FOR THAT SEAT. MY TIME IS UP. >> I WENT TO GIVE AN EXTRA MINUTE.

>> THANK YOU VERY MUCH. JUSTICE LEWIS'S EARLIER POINT ABOUT THE ISSUES THAT CHANGED SINCE THEN.

THE MOST IMPORTANT DIFFERENCE BETWEEN NOW INSPECTOR VERSUS GLISTEN LEGALLY IS THE 1996 AMENDMENT TO THE CONSTITUTION,

SPECTOR VERSUS GLISTEN HAD IS A CENTRAL PREMISE THAT PEOPLE WANT VACANCIES FILLED THROUGH THE ELECTION PROCESS AT THE EARLIEST

OPPORTUNITY BY EXTENDING THE INITIAL APPOINTED TERM TO TWO YEARS BEYOND THE CLOSEST ELECTION.

PEOPLE UNDERMINED THAT PREMISE AND THAT IS ANOTHER REASON SPECTOR SHOULD BE ILLEGAL. >> ANOTHER QUESTION.

AM I CORRECT THAT THE ISSUES WE HAVE BEEN DISCUSSING WERE DECIDED IN THE 2014 CASE. >> YES.

>> AM I CORRECT THE PARTIES IN 2014 SOUGHT REVIEW AND IT WAS NOT GRANTED? >> CORRECT.

>> WHAT WAS THE LEGAL ISSUE IN THE CASE THAT WE ARE CURRENTLY HERE ON TODAY? >> WE BELIEVE LEGAL ISSUES AND

FACTUAL ISSUES ARE LARGELY INDISTINGUISHABLE IN THE PARIENTE 9 CASE. >> WASN'T THE ISSUE WHETHER THE

TRIAL JUDGE AIRED IN A PRIMARY INJUNCTION? >> THE VEHICLE WAS DIFFERENT IN A FEW CASES.

IN 2014 CASE MISTER DAVID P. TROTTI V. RICK SCOTT, GOVERNOR, ET AL. SUBJECTED THE PETITION FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF

APPEAL, IN THIS CASE A DECLARATORY JUDGMENT WAS SOUGHT AND GRANTED BY THE TRIAL COURT AND REVERSED BY THE FIRST

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS. >> MAYBE I MISS READING IT BUT I READ THE CASE AS SIMPLY HOLDING BECAUSE OF THE 2014 OPINION

MISTER DAVID P. TROTTI V. RICK SCOTT, GOVERNOR, ET AL. COULD NOT SHOW SUBSTANTIAL LIKELIHOOD OF SUCCESS ON THE MERITS AND

THEREFORE THE INJUNCTION WAS INCORRECT SO THE COURT DID NOT READ DECIDE ANY OF THE ISSUES. THEY JUST DETERMINED THIS CASE,

THE HOLDING WAS THE TRIAL COURT WAS BOUND BY THAT CASE. IS THAT AN INACCURATE SUMMARY OF THE CASE?

>> IT IS ACCURATE AND THE VIEW EXPRESSED IN OUR JURISDICTION. WE ASK THIS COURT TO DISCORD JURISDICTION IS IMPROVISED AND

GRANTED OR OF THE DISTRICT DECISION. >> TO GO TO A POINT COUNSEL MADE NEAR THE END ABOUT THE 96

AMENDMENT, ALL IT DID WAS LENGTHEN TERM OF AN INTERIM APPOINTMENT BUT DIDN'T MAKE IT MORE PERMANENT OR CHANGE THE

RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ARTICLE 5 SECTION 10 OR ARTICLE 5 SECTION 11 AND I WOULD LIKE TO READ YOU ONE LINE, CITING 2009, LONG

AFTER THE 2006 AMENDMENT, THE NOMINATING COMMISSION PROCESS IS A RESTRAINT ON THE GOVERNOR, NOT A NEW PROCESS OF REMOVING FROM

THE PEOPLE THEIR TRADITIONAL RIGHT TO ELECT THEIR JUDGES. GOES ON TO QUOTE AT LENGTH SPECTRUM VERSUS GLISTEN.

EVERY MEMBER OF THE COURT FIND THAT OPINION. LET ME MAKE ANOTHER POINT. IF I COULD FOCUS IN A LITTLE BIT

ON THE DIFFICULTY WE ARE HAVING HERE. I DON'T THINK WE DISAGREE ABOUT THE BODY OF LAW THAT SAYS A

VACANCY IS CREATED IF THE RESIGNATION OCCURS BEFORE QUALIFYING. WHAT IS A VACANCY?

IS THIS A VACANCY? THE TRIAL JUDGE SAID THIS WAS AN ARTIFICIAL VACANCY. THAT IS A GOOD WAY TO PUT IT.

MY QUESTION, WOULD YOU BE SATISFIED IF SOMEBODY RESIGNED 15 MINUTES BEFORE MIDNIGHT ON THE LAST DAY OF HIS OR HER TERM.

NO WORK IS BEING DONE. THE COURTHOUSE IS NOT EVEN OPEN BUT WE HAVE TO BLINDLY AND REFLEXIVELY FOLLOW A RULE THAT

SAYS YOU KNOW THE JUDGE SUBMITTED RESIGNATION BEFORE THE QUALIFYING AND THERE ISN'T ANY REAL DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THAT

EXAMPLE AND WHAT OCCURRED HERE. ISN'T ANY REAL DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THAT AND SPECTOR. SPECTOR DIDN'T TURN ON THE FACT

THE JUSTICE URBAN RESIGNED IN THE LAST DAY OR THE DAY BEFORE OR THE WEEK BEFORE. THE WHOLE POINT IS THERE WAS

INTERVENING ELECTION AND HAVE CITIZENS HAVE A RIGHT TO ELECT THEIR SUPREME COURT JUSTICE IN THE ELECTION.

>> WOULD YOU ALSO AGREE THAT THE ISSUES WE ARE TALKING ABOUT WERE DECIDED BY THE PEOPLE IN 2014 IN THE FIRST DAVID P. TROTTI V.

RICK SCOTT, GOVERNOR, ET AL. CASE? >> THEY WERE BUT I DISAGREE -- >> WOULD YOU AGREE THAT THE

ISSUE ON APPEAL STATED IN THE OPINION WE ARE HERE ON IS THE TRIAL COURT ERRED IN GRANTING AN INJUNCTION ON THE BASIS THAT

THERE WAS NO SUBSTANTIAL LIKELIHOOD OF SUCCESS. IS THAT THE WAY THE COURT FRAMED THE ISSUE?

>> THE TRIAL COURT FULLY REACHED THE MERITS OF THE ISSUE AND -- >> TALKING ABOUT THE APPELLATE. >> YOUR QUESTIONING ME ABOUT

JURISDICTION. I WILL RESPECT THE FACT THAT JURISDICTION IS ALWAYS OPEN IN THIS AND NO QUESTION ABOUT IT.

>> AS MUCH AS WE WANT TO DECIDE A CASE -- >> IN THIS CASE THE FIRST DISTRICT MADE ITS DECISION IN

THIS OPINION, THE 18 OPINION BASED ON THE LANGUAGE OF THE CONSTITUTION, THE FIRST LINE OF THE STATE SUMMARY OF THE

ARGUMENT IS THIS CASE TURNS ON AND INTERPRETATION OF THE STATE CONSTITUTION SO THE COURT, I THINK TO ANSWER YOUR QUESTION,

THE COURT DENIED AN INJUNCTION BECAUSE IT DIDN'T AGREE WITH US ON THE MERITS. THE COURT REACHED THE MERITS ALL

OVER. >> ONE OTHER QUESTION. YOU JUST SAID IF THERE IS AN INTERVENING ELECTION THAT MAKES

THE DIFFERENCE. IF YOU ARE -- IT SAID IF I AM RESIGNING OCTOBER 31, 2018, SIX DAYS BEFORE THE ELECTION, THIS

WOULD BE AN APPOINTED SEAT. YOU AGREE TO THAT. >> YES I WOULD. >> IN YOUR MIND IT ALL TURNS ON

WHETHER OR NOT THERE IS IN FACT AN ELECTION BEFORE THE DATE OF THE RESIGNATION. >> YES AND THAT IS NOT JUST IN

MY MIND BUT WHAT SPECTOR SAYS. THE ONLY REASON TO MAKE AN INTERIM APPOINTMENT IS EMERGENCE OF PUBLIC BUSINESS.

FOUR DAYS, IS IT GOING TO SAY WE APPOINT SOMEBODY FOR FOUR DAYS? I AM OVER -- SPECTOR SAYS, AND TO THE CONFERENCE ROOM AND

HAVING TROUBLE WITH THAT I SUGGEST TO YOU THAT THE ANSWER IS THIS SHOULD BE AN ELECTION AND FLUSH THE DECISION OF THE

DISTRICT COURT. >> THANK YOU FOR YOUR ARGUMENTS.

For more infomation >> SC18-1217 David P. Trotti v. Rick Scott, Governor, et al. - Duration: 46:24.

-------------------------------------------

Esslingen am Neckar, bus line 122: Esslingen (N) ZOB/Bahnhof (S) - Flughafen/Messe (SAB) (S) - Duration: 38:55.

For more infomation >> Esslingen am Neckar, bus line 122: Esslingen (N) ZOB/Bahnhof (S) - Flughafen/Messe (SAB) (S) - Duration: 38:55.

-------------------------------------------

Liberal Mob Ambushes Restaurant For Hosting GOP Event – Owner Delivers Ultimate Payback - Duration: 4:29.

For more infomation >> Liberal Mob Ambushes Restaurant For Hosting GOP Event – Owner Delivers Ultimate Payback - Duration: 4:29.

-------------------------------------------

Opel Corsa 1.3 CDTi EcoFlex S/S Business Edition - Duration: 1:11.

For more infomation >> Opel Corsa 1.3 CDTi EcoFlex S/S Business Edition - Duration: 1:11.

-------------------------------------------

The short history of the Samsung Galaxy S series - Duration: 2:26.

*Intro*

Attention! In this video I'm talking only about the major models of the Galaxy S series. Modifications (Mini, S+, etc.) weren't mentioned.

The first waterproof phone in the series

The first frameless screen in the series

Music used in the video:

Like and share if you like the video!

For more infomation >> The short history of the Samsung Galaxy S series - Duration: 2:26.

-------------------------------------------

Vision Destroys Ultron | Avengers Age of Ultron (2015) Movie Clip - Duration: 2:19.

You're afraid.

Of you?

Of death.

You're the last one.

You were supposed to be the last.

Stark asked for a saviour

and settled for a slave.

I suppose we are both disappointments.

I suppose we are.

Humans are odd.

They think order and chaos are somehow opposites

and try to control what won't be.

But there is grace in their failings.

I think you missed that.

They're doomed.

Yes.

But a thing isn't beautiful because it lasts.

It's a privilege to be among them.

You're unbearably naive.

Well...

I was born yesterday.

For more infomation >> Vision Destroys Ultron | Avengers Age of Ultron (2015) Movie Clip - Duration: 2:19.

-------------------------------------------

People Finding Secret Hidden Rooms In Their Homes ! - Duration: 10:42.

Imagine finding a secret room in your house. Well a lot of people do and we're gonna look at those people

Let's go exploring when we first moved in. I like the curtains by the way

It's better than all the way and I looked out the window

and

and she's been scooting me as you can see it's a normal yard with a screen and

Roof, and they have a going on. What is that roof right there? Why is there a brief?

Like there's all the way. Yeah. I'm actually kind of curious. I love this as it came over here, okay

But I popped a hole in the wall, okay

But I don't understand why would somebody make a room and then cover it up by a wall

What are they trying to hide there better be treasure in this video or I'm gonna I'm gonna be mad

Okay

Little

Secret room he made a single room for his son best dad ever

That is so cool

I've always wanted like a secret room like a secret hideout or like a tree house and I never got either

Okay, maybe one day I should build one and be cool. Okay. Let's see. What's in here

Best dad ever. Wow, this is amazing. I've never been so jealous in my life

I'm happy for the kid, but I also want one of these

That may be so excited to see the rest of them so this guy's giving us a tour of his new apartment until he finds

Something he didn't expect here's the apartments I moved into last week. Okay, nice apartment

Do it all pretty nice rent was pretty cheap

So I moved into that even viewing the place we moved in without even viewing the place. That is some risky business

So you put a lot of faith in that I guess he said the rent was cheap

He's like I don't even care like it. Was that cheap. I couldn't just move into somewhere. What if there was

Or what if there was?

Ghosts or what if there's a secret dungeon 3d old building really high ceilings

Okay, like a 19th century monastery in the middle of England. So you come on through here guys. It's mirrors everywhere

Hello, because mirrors make a place look bigger

I like Marissa Mayer is like let a lot of life into place to like it makes it place a bigger like I'm a I'm

A fan of having mirrors Edward and then also you got to check out your alpha and you're like who dressed me today?

Like what am I wearing or you can be like outfit complete closet space?

All the usual stuff. Okay. Got a pretty steep staircase leading up to the bedroom

The bedroom is on a mezzanine. It was pretty small. I was pretty disappointed with the bedroom, honestly

I'm okay with staircases, but leading to a bedroom being half asleep and stairs. Do not mix like, you know many times

I'm going to tumble down that low stairs

No, I need to be fully awake before I tackle stairs pretty small can't even stand up book. Kick

It's like a loft. I kind of like it. It feels like I'm really weird mirrors on a roof, but I guess there's groan

I don't like doesn't need a bunk bed in his life. It's pretty interesting. Watch out, you know fall out of bed

And kill yourself then what is that?

Stephanie handle it looks like a handle dude. So I figured you know bit of underfloor storage

Let's lift it up

Users beware guys, I'm pretty deep

- I had enough torch on top - camera see he's thinking he's thinking you I want to see this. I'm expecting treasure

Okay honest, it looks a little creepy

What I did this alone No, call me a scaredy-cat all you want I am

Just owns an old brickwork, this is so cool

And kind of discussing this room on the bright side underneath my apartment

Is this safe like what if this Colossus?

See CFC, okay

Sure. I don't know that means looks like this window has been pretty tough

Well, they just spew we don't somebody used to live down here

Break seats. Hey, you know what? I think he should do guys

I think he should like remodel it, you know, like make it all clean

Like put nice walls up and like have like a secret hideaway and then he gets so much more living space

Like his square footage is doubled. Hello. Oh, it's just a doorknob. I thought it was a creepy doll

A lot of space out here. This is literally bigger than his apartment, dude

You got to make this all your apartment got a do it

I got a next one guys that one lived in our home for 28 years what 8 years recently we discovered

We love our home, but recently we discovered a little bit of a problem. What what's the problem? We don't like problems

Here it has been you know, we do with problems

I'm joking. Whoa. Am I in our back porch? That's a Ford put flagstone, dude

Killing me. It started up here but a month ago. I was a hole just starting to appear out of nowhere and we

Worked it took the flagstone off

And this is what we have found

Okay this hole

Okay, okay. Okay, okay

That's scary that's dangerous you could fall down there

that's

cavern

What that's 16 feet deep. What could you even do with that? Like nothing. This is where I keep on my exploit guys

I'm joking by though. I mean I say these things please don't take them seriously

I would never store my ex-boyfriends in a in a dish

I always try to be saying a good recipe Oh, we figure it was a well from

6070 years ago

well, we're not sure that's the craziest thing we've ever seen that probably was a well that does the only thing that makes sense like

Why would you need anything? This deep wells scare me because scary movies we uncovered it

And it's gonna be filled with what probably blink dark. I really can be fastened like this

I can't you make something cool out of it. I think it's such a waste not to

It's also dangerous not to always not assume. What's in your backyard. All right, he's like really annoyed

I didn't like more like intrigued me

hmm Oh Leon 7 News secret passages hidden wires secret passageways hidden buyers

Matches this Denver Hall booby trap perhaps by a local mobster. These people's house has been booby-trapped

Doing a very simple home remodeling project damn first. We couldn't trust people now. We can't even trust our own houses. What is

white when Alan takes us inside a Denver crime families secret hideaway Oh,

Like you literally moved into somebody secret hideaway. These people are living in a movie

Okay, like this can't be real life, but it is on the outside

It may look like any other historic home in this North Denver neighborhood

This is the basement. But inside Wow, the secrets of the gangster's paradise

Here goes nothing are flying revealed. There was a

Full wall here when Matt Feeny bought his 1891 Victorian on Osage Street

It needed some TLC. So he started to knock out the walls and the walls

Started to talk. So house. We're knocking it out

Hitting it right here. We're smelling matches as if they've you know being constantly lit Feeny says buried in plaster

He discovered a row of matches. That's so dangerous. They over set off the traps

it was got back sack by their own house and it led to

These canvas packets taped up against the wall matches fuses

Newspapers Feeny feels his new residence was rigged. So you think this house was booby-trapped I do

I think that might have just been a way

for them to

Quickly make a distraction. He hasn't found any evidence of foul play only photos and letters and a bottle of poison

That's cool. If only these walls could really talk once this man found a bottle of poison

Man, oh man. Oh man this got real real quick. That's a big hole in the ground. He's walking so close to it

Dude, be careful

My car parts on their front front driveway. I went to reverse out as I did

Crumbling

Front tire imagine this whole car just like fell through like Schramm Karen on reverse now and all of a sudden the car jolted forward

And I've got some real resistance. So I really put my foot down reversed out

Yeah, then go out the car and checked and this hole had just opened up in the front garden

Well, isn't that terrifying some of the slaps out of the way in investigate? We actually found that

Hey guys, it's ready to go down the ladder cuz I am so yeah, the actual shelter itself is 10 feet down so

It was completely filled up with mud to about here

But we've we've managed to dig it down 5 5 feet so far you can see five of the wrongs

this dude is

Ready for the zombie apocalypse like ready like no one else is like I need a shelter

You could never be too prepared for life. So this is the actual shelter itself

Um, obviously the main room where the ladder comes down

But then this is the actual part I guess where they used to go when the bombs were dropping so

When the sirens went off they'd run down the ladder into the safe room down there

You can see the height of it. There is 10 feet down

So that's how low I need to get this room, but let's get in there. I'm not even joking

He need to stop that up with food like hand food

Obviously because that lasts forever any stock put up with canned food and then if there's ever a zombie apocalypse

We know where to go. Okay. I hope here's enough room for odd. Ozzie Landers. Anyways, guys. I hope you enjoyed this video

I love you guys so much

Stay awesome, Stacey and don't forget to be nice other

For more infomation >> People Finding Secret Hidden Rooms In Their Homes ! - Duration: 10:42.

-------------------------------------------

SCU Law: Charney Hall Dedication - Duration: 2:02.

(upbeat music)

- [Lisa] Good morning.

I am so excited to celebrate the dedication of

the Howard S. And Alida S. Charney Hall of Law with you.

As Howard has said,

this gorgeous building is just the starting point

as the School of Law realizes its vision

to become a premier and distinctive law- Jesuit law school,

that produces excellent, ethical leaders

at the complex intersection of

law, technology, business, justice, and ethics.

(upbeat music)

- [Michael] Right now, the Jesuits are called

to be on the frontiers of society.

And when we think about Silicon Valley,

we think of the frontiers of the digital age,

the expanding reach of bioengineering,

the unfolding possibility of nanotechnology.

This is the place where Jesuit institutions should be.

This is the place where Jesuit law schools should be,

because of the values, the ethics,

and the commitment to justice

that is part and parcel of the whole law school experience.

(upbeat music)

- But if, as attorneys and leaders,

you can help restore respect for the law,

restore that American Dream,

strengthen our democracy,

and most of all, protect our values,

then that, ladies and gentlemen,

will be the greatest legacy of Charney Hall.

- [Howard] So I thought I'd get all of you here today

in support of this new building at Santa Clara Law.

And I hope that over the next five years, or ten years,

or however long it takes,

we can work together to make this school

an ever-improving forum for greatness.

(soft upbeat music)

For more infomation >> SCU Law: Charney Hall Dedication - Duration: 2:02.

-------------------------------------------

Citroën C1 1.0-12V Séduction - Duration: 1:03.

For more infomation >> Citroën C1 1.0-12V Séduction - Duration: 1:03.

-------------------------------------------

Das letzte Wort: Der Wahlberater | Zur Sache Baden-Württemberg! - Duration: 2:08.

For more infomation >> Das letzte Wort: Der Wahlberater | Zur Sache Baden-Württemberg! - Duration: 2:08.

-------------------------------------------

IRETGE x STROKAR INSIDE - Duration: 3:52.

For more infomation >> IRETGE x STROKAR INSIDE - Duration: 3:52.

-------------------------------------------

L aMinute 30 des Pyrénées - Pic de Listo - Episode 2 - Duration: 1:31.

For more infomation >> L aMinute 30 des Pyrénées - Pic de Listo - Episode 2 - Duration: 1:31.

-------------------------------------------

Renault Twingo 1.0 SCe 70pk S&S Collection - Duration: 0:54.

For more infomation >> Renault Twingo 1.0 SCe 70pk S&S Collection - Duration: 0:54.

-------------------------------------------

Ashere Aaa By Ustaad Manzoor Sakhrani Karaoke Track - Duration: 5:52.

Welcome To Sindhi Tracks Channel

Singer Ustad Manzoor Sakhrani

Track Karaoke Ashere AAA

Subscribed My Channel More Update Videos

Click The Bell Icon Like Comment &Share Thanks Alot

For more infomation >> Ashere Aaa By Ustaad Manzoor Sakhrani Karaoke Track - Duration: 5:52.

-------------------------------------------

Audi Q3 € 2.394 demovoordeel,- 1.4 TFSI CoD Sport Advance Sport 150 pk S tronic (vsb 20215) voorra - Duration: 1:09.

For more infomation >> Audi Q3 € 2.394 demovoordeel,- 1.4 TFSI CoD Sport Advance Sport 150 pk S tronic (vsb 20215) voorra - Duration: 1:09.

-------------------------------------------

Should You Write a Catchy Title for Your Scientific Paper? - Duration: 8:16.

Hi.

I'm Karen McKee, retired scientist and author with another video about scientific writing.

Did you know that there is a group of Swedish scientists who have a running bet as to who

can publish the most papers before retirement with titles containing Bob Dylan quotes?

The paper that kicked off the contest was this one published in Nature Medicine in 1997.

"Nitric oxide and inflammation: the answer is blowing in the wind"

More papers with Dylan-inspired titles followed.

Are catchy titles like this a good idea?

In this video, I'll address this question and talk more broadly about what goes into

a good title for a scientific paper.

[music]

Successful authors put a lot of thought into writing their titles.

This is because the title of a paper is the single most important factor determining how

many people will find and eventually read that paper.

If a title doesn't sound interesting or relevant, people will pass the paper by.

On the other hand, a title that is thoughtfully crafted will attract readers.

A good title will also help convince a journal editor that the paper is worth considering.

But how do you come up with an effective and compelling title?

Well, there are a number of dos and don'ts when writing your title.

One admonition is to avoid unnecessary phrases such as "a study of" or "an investigation of"

Such phrases, which are more common in older papers, usually do nothing more than add to

the length of the title.

Today, journals usually limit the number of words or characters used in a title, so it

makes sense to omit unnecessary words.

You also want to avoid jargon, acronyms, and abbreviations in the title because only a

handful of experts will understand what these mean, as in this hypothetical example.

Although a few experts will understand that the acronym ADH stands for the enzyme alcohol

dehydrogenase, many potential readers will not.

Another mistake is to write a title that is too broad and does not convey what the paper found

For example, a title that just states the broad topic of the research:

Response of coastal wetlands to sea-level rise

Is this study about all coastal wetlands?

In all geographic locations?

Unless it's a review paper, probably not.

More importantly, this hypothetical title does not reveal what the study found.

Here is a title from one of my published papers:

Someone reading just the title knows that we specifically studied mangroves, a type

of coastal wetland, and conducted the work in the Caribbean Region.

The title also explains the key finding of the paper, which is that these mangroves adjust

their soil elevations in relation to sea level through biological, rather than just physical processes.

In other words, our findings were novel and of interest to others.

But what biological processes?

Exactly where does this adjustment take place?

You have to read the paper to find out.

That's what you want to do with your title.

Capture the reader's attention and provoke them to read your paper.

Another point that some experts mention is that you should avoid the use of question

marks, colons and hyphens in a title.

In general, it is better to state a clear finding instead of posing a question.

And use of colons or hyphens often means the title is too long.

However, such punctuation marks may not always be problematic.

One of my most highly cited papers has a question mark and a hyphen in the title.

Use of a question mark might be appropriate, for example, if your study's findings provided

evidence for a mechanism but could not demonstrate it conclusively.

In this study, we had strong but circumstantial evidence for the role of drought in causing

dieback of salt marshes.

The question mark acknowledges that we did not find the smoking gun, but did identify

a strong suspect.

But if you have a clear outcome, go with a declarative statement that conveys your key

finding.

Another common admonition is to avoid overly long titles with too much detail.

Some studies have shown that papers with short titles receive more citations than ones with

longer titles.

Papers with shorter titles may be easier to read and understand and, hence, attract more

readers.

It's also possible that authors of highly cited papers tend to craft more concise titles

or publish in journals restricting title length.

My recommendation is that you should not be aiming for a title with a specific word count,

but one that best fits your paper and that contains important keywords.

The reason you want to pay attention to keywords in titling your paper is because search engines

use the words in a document's title to assign its ranking in a search.

For example, here is the working title of a review paper I coauthored:

"The relative role of mangrove vegetation in maintenance of soil elevations within the

intertidal habitat"

Unless this is your field, it's unlikely that this title will convince you to download and

read this paper.

More importantly, that title lacks an important key phrase, which is sea level rise.

Here is the final title of our paper:

"How mangrove forests adjust to rising sea level"

This title is more attractive and shorter than the original and contains several search

terms that people are likely to use to find information on the topic of our paper.

OK.

Let's return to the topic of catchy titles and if they are a good idea.

Apparently, there are hundreds of scientific papers with allusions to song lyrics and literature.

Besides Dylan, Shakespeare, Lewis Carroll, and Star Trek are favorite sources of inspiration,

according to this study.

While catchy titles may sound clever or amusing, they probably shouldn't be used for a typical

scientific paper.

You've already heard the reasons why.

One reason is that not everyone will get the Bob Dylan quote or other saying you might

use in the title.

Another reason is that the extra words add to the title length.

The catchy title may not clearly convey the key finding of the paper

And finally, the catchy title often includes words that will not help readers find your

paper in an online search.

In the end, your goal in crafting a title for your paper is to condense your paper into

a single, brief statement that sends a clear message and simultaneously attracts readers.

To see how to distill your message down to a single sentence that can be used as a title,

see the video mentioned in the description.

Also, I've included some references to articles about titles of scientific articles at the

end of this video and in the description below the video.

I hope you find this information useful when you are writing your next scientific paper.

And don't forget to like my video if you found this helpful.

[music]

For more infomation >> Should You Write a Catchy Title for Your Scientific Paper? - Duration: 8:16.

-------------------------------------------

Would you press the button? - Duration: 4:09.

Okay. Are we rolling? Are we rolling?

There's a red light on the screen.

Am I rolling? Okay, forget this, Charlie.

Give me the-- give me the camera, Charlie!

Charlie, give me the camera. You're not filming--

Hey, guys. Want to toss in a quick disclaimer

to say a huge shout out to the sponsor of this video,

which is YouTube Originals and the show "Origin."

Hopefully you guys enjoy this video

and, uh, I'll see you in the next frame,

really, to be honest. All right, bye!

All right. What's up, everybody?

I just went through a very unique experience, to say the least.

If you guys are watching this video,

make sure you go over to my YouTube channel first

to see the first half of this.

It should actually be in the description down below.

There'll be a link to the first part.

I just opened this box from "Origin."

There was a flashlight, and a very powerful flashlight, at that point.

I got a bag of dirt.

And I got this nasty ball of ooze

which is now covered in paper.

We're gonna make sure we start with the letter this time.

The second letter, actually. What is it doing?

The last item in the box is...

( suspenseful music )

~~- Boom! A button. -~~ ~~( explosion )~~

It is a golden button.

In front of us, we have a button.

This was the last piece of the box.

It is a random golden button,

and a letter, titled "The Button."

It says, "The Button." ( chuckle )

"Please watch USB file two." Where is that USB at?

I'm gonna watch that before we continue.

I'll be right back.

I'll just put it on the screen,

whatever I'm seeing right now.

This is a big file, man.

This is almost a gig.

It's a clip from the show

that I think has a button in it.

Hey! What do you think this does?

There's the button, guys.

It looks like something you would press in an emergency.

We only know if we try.

Wait. We have no idea what that does.

Yeah, but we're stuck in fucking no man's land.

The crew aren't coming. I say we push it.

Can we pause there for a second?

Can we take in the fact that Tom Felton just swore?

That hit me right in the childhood right there.

I'm not sure about this.

All right, all in favor.

Yeah.

That's four against four. I think we should wait.

- ( gasps ) - ( panting )

What the hell's going on?

- Jesus Christ! Go, go, go, go! - Climb!

Oh, you-- no! That's it?

Okay, let me finish reading this.

This is actually kind of fun.

"In front of you is a mysterious button.

Much like the group stuck on the ship,

you are faced with the challenge of deciding

to push the button, which opens a door.

Is there help on the other side?

Or is there danger?

Do you risk everybody's life,

or potentially save them?

The choice is yours.

Choose wisely, 'Origin.'"

In the scenario, guys, stuck on a ship,

you have no idea what to do or where to go,

but there's a button. I'm gonna be honest with you.

I think-- I think I'd push--

Ooh. Clearly, it looks like it was a bad idea.

First, what's gonna happen when I push this button?

Is it actually gonna open up a door somewhere?

Would I push a button if I was in that situation?

If there was a window of some kind,

I would try to look through just to see what's

on the other side of the door, obviously.

I think everybody would try that.

If there's no window,

I'm gonna go ahead and say,

yes, I would hit the button.

( alarms blaring )

You're stuck on a ship, there's nobody around,

you have nothing to lose at this point.

You're floating in deep space. What else do you have to lose?

You need to get off the ship, you need to progress somehow,

so if there's a button, you don't know what it does,

I would push it as well.

I'm with these guys, I would push it.

( alarms blaring )

100%.

100%, I would push the button.

And for anybody out there that's challenging me,

I wanna hear your logic.

If there's something on the other side

that's gonna try and kill you,

well, there's eight of you to fight it off.

Thank you so much to "Origin" for sending me this package,

and also for hosting me on their YouTube channel.

I absolutely, absolutely love unboxing random boxes like this,

so 100% I'll be watching "Origin" once it comes out.

Thank you guys so much for watching.

You can check out my stuff on my YouTube channel,

the @danocracy.

There'll be a link in the description down below.

And I hope in the fall, which is coming up soon--

actually are we in-- no, we're not in the fall yet.

When the fall arrives, hopefully we can chat

and figure what goes on in the series, so, yeah.

Thank you guys so much for watching.

I'll see you guys in my next video.

See you guys later.

For more infomation >> Would you press the button? - Duration: 4:09.