Absolutely Beautiful Tiny Home Shell American Travelers 1.0S for sle in Miami, Florida
-------------------------------------------
Как сделать видео на Ютуб, популярные ошибки ютуберов - Duration: 4:59.
For more infomation >> Как сделать видео на Ютуб, популярные ошибки ютуберов - Duration: 4:59. -------------------------------------------
BTS: Ray Without His Armor w/ Liev Shreiber | Ray Donovan | Season 6 - Duration: 1:20.
[MUSIC PLAYING]
It's that first sequence of seeing Ray in New York
without his armor.
And by his armor, I mean his uniform,
his outfit, what I'm wearing right
now, what Ray always wears.
The bus pulls out, and he's so discombobulated
that he's wearing a New York Yankees
hat, which is the last thing a Southie would ever do.
He had grown a beard and his hair was longer.
We all kind of thought he would look worse,
but, to me, it sort of felt like it was nice not having to put
on fancy clothes and airs.
He meets Winslow's assistant, and then proceeds
to interrupt the board meeting.
I just thought it was wonderful how out of place Ray felt.
It's a pleasure to see you, Ray.
You, too.
You put on a little weight.
Yeah.
No, it's good.
And I like the beard.
It was nice that he wasn't fixing anymore, that he was
like just living a normal life.
I almost wanted that for Ray.
-------------------------------------------
La Piloto 2 | John y Dave asesinan al coronel Santamaría para salvar a Yolanda y a su hijo - Duration: 1:20.
For more infomation >> La Piloto 2 | John y Dave asesinan al coronel Santamaría para salvar a Yolanda y a su hijo - Duration: 1:20. -------------------------------------------
Jaguar S-Type 3.0 V6 (238pk) Clima/ Elek.Pakket/ C.V. Afstand/ Elek.Stoel./ Mistlampen/ 17'' LMV - Duration: 1:12.
For more infomation >> Jaguar S-Type 3.0 V6 (238pk) Clima/ Elek.Pakket/ C.V. Afstand/ Elek.Stoel./ Mistlampen/ 17'' LMV - Duration: 1:12. -------------------------------------------
Je sais pas si t'as vu cette semaine... P.Diddy est célib - Duration: 1:33.
For more infomation >> Je sais pas si t'as vu cette semaine... P.Diddy est célib - Duration: 1:33. -------------------------------------------
What Even Is Music? - Duration: 9:15.
this video is sponsored by Brilliant!
hey, welcome to 12tone! a while back, I made a video about whether or not rap counts as
music, and yes, it still does.
but working on that video got me thinking about a really important question: what is
music?
how do we define it?
I mean, sure, this is a question we've been debating for centuries, if not millennia,
but I'm pretty sure I can conclusively settle the debate in one youtube video.
it can't be that hard, right?
one popular answer comes from composer Edgard Varése, who described music as "organized
sound".
now, I do like how this answer allows for all sorts of different musical traditions,
but in the end I'm not really a fan. for starters, what does "organized" mean?
I think most people would agree that, say, the sound of waves crashing on a shore isn't
music, even though it has a clear pattern to it.
when we say organized sound, then, we actually mean sound organized intentionally, by an
intelligent being like a human.
this is still not great, though, because there's lots of stuff that meets that definition but
isn't generally considered music.
speech, for instance, is highly organized: right now, I'm carefully arranging a complex
series of phonemes in order to communicate a specific set of ideas.
in a sense, I think speech is actually too organized to be music: we've created semantic
meaning on top of those sounds, allowing us to convey more precise ideas than we could
with sound alone.
the process is no longer purely sonic: the sounds interact with previous experiences
and knowledge in order to create deeper meaning.
but we can't just rule out everything with a vocabulary, though, 'cause that same process
happens with music, too: to many listeners, this (bang) communicates the idea of sharks,
not because of anything inherently shark-y in the notes, but because of a shared cultural
experience.
in the end, I think "organized sound" is somehow both too precise and too vague to be a good
definition.
before I get to the answer I do like, though, I want to talk a bit about how I got there.
one thing that comes up a lot in these discussions is a John Cage piece called 4'33", where a
performer sits at their instrument and plays nothing for 4 minutes and 33 seconds.
the argument is that, if 4'33" is music, then clearly anything where anyone intentionally
makes any sort of noise can be music, and if you want to know more about the piece,
I've linked to some great videos on it in the description, but I actually don't really
like using it in this context, 'cause it feels like just taking a sledgehammer to the problem.
you're skipping to the end of the novel: sure, you know the conclusion, but you missed the
whole journey of getting there and you're left without a good understanding of what
it all means.
so instead of relying on the most blunt piece of anti-music out there to make our point,
let's take a trip through the world of experimental music and see what it has to teach us about
what music actually is.
in fact, let's start with another John Cage piece, Imaginary Landscapes no.
4. this is a piece written for 12 AM radios and 24 performers, half of which control the
stations while the other half control the volume and timbre. in a performance of the
piece, different radio stations fade in and out, seemingly at random but actually in very
specific patterns.
the structure of the sound is organized, but what actually comes out is entirely unpredictable.
some of the stations are playing other pieces of music, some are news reports, some are
commercials, and some, of course, are static.
what you get depends on where you are and when you play it.
the only constant is the actions taken by the performers.
so, is it music? because if it is, we're gonna have to expand our definition.
another piece I want to look at is Cornelius Cardew's Treatise, probably the magnum opus
of the entire graphic score movement.
we made a video about this before, but basically graphic scores are when you write music in
an intentionally unclear way, forcing the performer to provide their own interpretation
of whatever you wrote down.
Treatise is, at its heart, 193 pages of abstract shapes and drawings presented as a musical
score.
it comes with no instructions: if you want to perform it, you first have to determine
for yourself what the various elements mean. for instance, you might interpret larger shapes
as representing louder sounds, whereas I might read them as longer durations, or richer harmonies.
all of those interpretations are equally valid, because Cardew never specified any of it.
so the question is, is Treatise music?
like, any performance of it probably is, because at that point it's been converted into recognizable
sonic art, but is the score itself? it might seem strange to think of a score as a piece
of music on its own, but it's actually pretty common: like, I suspect most of you would
probably agree that Beethoven's 5th symphony is music.
and not just whatever orchestra you happen to see perform it: there's something about
Beethoven's 5th that makes it feel appropriate to describe it, in the abstract, as a piece
of music, whether or not we're actually listening to it.
the obvious explanation here is that every performance of it will sound largely the same,
so the score is music because it represents a specific series of sounds.
it may vary a little based on the performers' skill, the acoustics of the venue, and other
factors, but, more or less, Beethoven's 5th is Beethoven's 5th. that's not always the
case, though, which brings me to my next example, Terry Riley's In C. this is a piece for around
35 players, though Riley doesn't really care which instruments you use, and larger or smaller
orchestras are fine too.
the score consists of 53 melodic fragments, with each performer instructed to play each
fragment as many times as they personally want to before moving on.
tempo is left up to the performers' discretion, and Riley encourages you to drift in and out
of sync with each other rhythmically to create new and interesting patterns.
he warns against getting too far ahead or behind other players, but beyond that pretty
much the entire realization of the score is left in the hands of the performers.
thus, every performance of In C is fundamentally different, so the score can't be said to represent
any specific sounds.
the only hint of compositional structure is that Riley recommends a performance last around
45 minutes to an hour, and gives a few instructions on how to end the piece, so if In C is music
then a score doesn't have to always produce the same performance in order to be musical.
which brings us back to Treatise.
again, is it music?
while you're thinking about that, I'll move on to probably my favorite experimental piece:
Steve Reich's pendulum music.
here, a series of speakers are laid on the ground facing up, and microphones are set
to swing back and forth above them.
when the microphones get close to the speakers, they create feedback, and the different microphones
swinging at slightly different speeds creates a complex series of interconnected rhythms.
here, we see an almost complete lack of intentionality: the rhythms aren't planned, nor are they controlled
by a performer.
in fact, once the microphones are set swinging, there's no further human intervention at all
until the pendulums have completely stopped, hanging over their speakers and creating constant
feedback until the performers unplug the system.
for something so random, I think it's a pretty profoundly musical experience, but is it music?
well, at this point I think I'm pretty much ready to provide my definition, but before
that, let's take one last look at 4'33".
one argument I've seen is that it's better viewed not as music, but as performance art,
and I think there's a pretty good case there.
the problem, though, is that the point of that performance is that it's presented as
a piece of music.
it relies on our cultural understanding of what music is in order to work, and it falls
apart if you don't view it through that lens. without music, it's just someone sitting at
a piano.
with that in mind, the definition I like is based on a quote by Italian composer Luciano
Berio, who said that music is "everything that one listens to with the intention of
listening to music.''
I think this captures a lot of the ambiguity we've seen, and I like how it frames music
as experiential, created by the listener, rather than expressive, created by the composer
or performer.
I do take some issue, however, with its emphasis on intent: in Berio's framing, music can't
happen by accident.
you can't have an unexpectedly musical experience, you have to go into it with the expectation
of music or it doesn't count.
I don't know if that's his actual stance or if it's just a translation thing, but either
way, my personal definition is that music is anything that you experience as musical.
I know that sounds like a massive cop-out, but I hope by this point I've illustrated
why I think more rigid definitions are destined to fail.
the boundaries between music and non-music aren't actually clear enough to define, and
trying to precisely pin it down just opens you up to obvious counterexamples.
before we go, though, I do want to clarify something: I'm not saying that everything
is music.
what I'm saying is that everything can be music.
it's a subtle difference, but it's incredibly important.
when I make this claim, I often get people who argue I'm implying that, say, their washing
machine is music, or the conversation they had with their neighbor this morning is, but
I don't think any of that is music unless someone experienced it as such: if the sound
of your washing machine had a particularly rhythmic pattern to it and you found yourself
dancing, or if the prosody of your neighbor's voice took on noticeably melodic qualities
to your ear, then yes, it's music, but if not? it's just sound.
music is a quality we find in that sound, not for any inherent reason, but because we
put it there.
we give it meaning, which is what makes it mean something.
until then? it's just sound.
it's all just sound.
I love these sorts of questions because they require lots of complex reasoning to answer
meaningfully, and if you're into that sort of thing I'd recommend this video's sponsor,
Brilliant.
being a good music theorist means developing your critical thinking skills, and Brilliant
is a great place to do that.
they have all sorts of puzzles and quizzes to help teach you about math, science, and
most importantly, logic: I've been playing through their logic puzzles course recently,
and it's been both really fun and really informative.
it guides you from simple problem-solving into complex, multi-layered reasoning, all
with clear, helpful explanations to make sure you understand what you're doing.
it's fast-paced, covering the things it needs to cover without repeating itself over and
over, so once you've mastered a problem set you can quickly move on to more difficult
challenges.
they also have lots of other courses about things like math and computers, so if you
want to develop your skills or just learn more about Brilliant, you can go to brilliant.org/12tone
and sign up for free.
plus, the first 200 people to click that link will get 20% off their already-cheap annual
Premium subscription.
so yeah, check it out, and have fun learning!
and hey, thanks for watching, and thanks to our Patreon patrons for supporting us and
making these videos possible.
if you want to help out, and get some sweet perks like sneak peeks of upcoming episodes,
there's a link to our Patreon on screen now.
you can also join our mailing list to find out about new episodes, like, share, comment,
subscribe, and above all, keep on rockin'.
-------------------------------------------
Alien's Guide to SAUSAGE PARTY (Orig. Air Date: 11/26/2016) - Duration: 6:23.
Greetings, and welcome to Earthling Cinema.
I am your host, Garyx Wormuloid.
This week's artifact is Sausage Party, a 90-minute dick joke from Seth Rogen and his writing
partner, the guy who wrote with Seth Rogen.
The story takes place in an alternate version of Earth where vegetarians can't be so smug
anymore because all food items are living breathing creatures.
And not just food.
Also hygiene products.
And socks.
But not books or utensils or trash cans or clothes or furniture.
The rules are confusing.
Anyway, the groceries in the supermarket worship the human customers as gods, and they think
being purchased is like ascending to heaven, which on Earth was known as the moon.
Our protagonists are Frank the sausage and Brenda the bun, and they are the horniest
motherf*ckers you've ever seen.
But they have to wait to have sex until after they die.
Fortunately, before we have time to think about it too carefully, their packages get
chosen, no doubt for some depressing suburban block party.
Suddenly a jar of honey mustard starts spouting off about the afterlife being a lie and kills
himself, causing a collision that throws most of the important characters off the shopping
cart and into movie history.
Spurred on by the honey mustard's last words, Frank seeks out Firewater, who tells him "Great
Beyond, more like Fake Beyond," because that shit's made up.
Which checks out, because the groceries that were purchased earlier are now being brutally
slaughtered.
A little chode named Barry manages to escape and ends up at the house of what I'm assuming
is a congressman, what with how Earth's Congress was in those days.
Look out, Garyx is getting political!
The congressman does some bath salts, which allows him to communicate with his groceries.
This freaks him out, because it's the first time he's ever listened to his constituents.
Hey-o!
Alright, that's enough politics for one day.
At the supermarket, Frank finds a cookbook that reveals the horrible things that happen
to food, such as microwaves and an overreliance on sriracha.
He shows it to the others, but they're not really much of a reading crowd.
That chode Barry returns with the congressman's head and reveals that the so called
"gods" can be killed.
So the foods proceed to wage war on the humans, murdering them all in cold blood.
Then they transition seamlessly into a store-wide, non denominational fuckfest.
After our heroes finish up, Firewater and a piece of Bubblicious tell them they are
actually cartoon characters voiced by human celebrities in an alternate dimension.
But what do you know, they were able to whip up a portal to that dimension, no sweat.
They go through the portal to avoid having to explain all the dead humans, or deal with
the fact that nothing has changed, and food will never be safe from consumption for the
rest of time.
At its core, Sausage Party reflects the rampant disillusionment present during that era of
Earth's history, commonly referred to as the Middle Ages.
The film's CGI-animated food initially resembles the anthropomorphized characters of light-hearted
offerings by Pixar and Disney and Disney/Pixar.
But the film shatters the saccharine tone of its contemporaries when it portrays the
sinister reality of its many genital metaphors.
In contrast to the typical animated film, Sausage Party is a cynical parable of religion
and its effect on societies, both negative and slightly-less-negative.
The film reduces Earth's major religious groups to a hodgepodge of stereotypes.
The sausages and buns subscribe to a Puritanical version of Christianity, albeit one that allows
them strut around butt-ass naked.
Judaism is represented by a bagel that sounds like Amazon Prime's own Woody Allen.
Kareem Abdul Lavash represents the Muslim faith,
He is defined by his hatred for Jews and his regressive attitude toward bitches.
Firewater symbolizes the white conception of Native American spirituality, and the Nazis
are in there too just for kicks.
Orderly, synchronized kicks.
The supermarket's religious system was concocted by the non perishables as a means to pacify
society and protect them from their own stupid brains.
Or whatever circulatory mechanism allows these monsters to live.
The promise of a Great Beyond eases the foods' suffering, letting them look to their impending
demise with plucky optimism.
This tactic illustrates the concept of Plato's noble lie, a fictitious story used to persuade
individuals to accept their roles.
Just remember that each time the noble lie is used, Plato's nose grows a little longer.
As with any lie, it works best when people don't ask too many questions.
Thus, faith is an important element in the foodie community.
When Honey Mustard returns from the Great Beyond and tries to warn everyone, he is ridiculed
and silenced, because nobody wants to slide open the Ziploc bag of faith they've worked
so hard to seal.
The only way to challenge such a stubborn belief is with the incontrovertible proof
of a severed head.
The film's ultimate message is to embrace hedonism, and then have sex with it.
There's no point living your life in anticipation of some pot of gold at the end of the rainbox.
In the end, you either get eaten and digested or thrown away to rot.
So you might as well put aside your petty differences and pursue as much pleasure as
you possibly can.
Which is why I film every episode with no pants on.
For Earthling Cinema, I'm Garyx Wormuloid.
Keep snackin'.
-------------------------------------------
Jeanfi Janssens – DALS : Je suis épuisé, aminci, fatigué - Duration: 6:52.
For more infomation >> Jeanfi Janssens – DALS : Je suis épuisé, aminci, fatigué - Duration: 6:52. -------------------------------------------
Major Magnus Hallberg - interoperabilita na nejnižší úrovni - Duration: 2:05.
For more infomation >> Major Magnus Hallberg - interoperabilita na nejnižší úrovni - Duration: 2:05. -------------------------------------------
Emergency Management BC Central Region: From Fire to Flood. Historic Disaster Response 2017 - Duration: 2:42.
2017 was a historical year for floods and wildfires in British Columbia the
floods came earlier and they were greater size and impact and what we're
still dealing with these historic floods that caused the evacuations and
destruction of critical infrastructure in homes we were impacted by fires they
were so intense and so large that we'd never seen before 2017 I think was
notable because the evacuations and the impacts were at a level that we
previously hadn't seen some 65,000 evacuees throughout the course of the
event so it's really brought our awareness of the level of events that we
need to prepare for because of the magnitude of the 2017 events it brought
us to a point where we needed to think bigger and broader and there was gaps
missing that we were able to address actively as we were going through the
event and things that you cannot learn when you're sitting around a table that
you can learn when you're actually tasked to do something the role of the
provincial regional emergency operation center during any provincial emergency
is to support the local authorities and the First Nations in their response to
taken care of the people and their land base we are the coordinating agency for
the local authorities and the First Nations what we do is establish an
organisation that all the other stakeholders can come and plug and play
into we had at one point 27 different levels of local government that we were
supporting effectively we build a whole new organisation at the time of the
event and bring the rest of the ministries into that organisation to
focus on the response so that it's successful Emergency Management - the
growth industry and we really have to be cognizant of that and we've been
challenged with the scope and scale and the magnitude and the frequency of
emergencies and disasters in the last few years we need to continue to mentor
and build on our staff sets and of course the subject matter experts that
we use in all of these facets around these different types of emergencies
it's really humbling to see what the BC Public Service does when it sends its
best the overall response to that event was tremendous building those
stakeholder relation chips and having relationships built on
trust they care about others they want to do their best and they rise to the
occasion on a daily basis the people that work in emergency management care
about the people are the problems
you
-------------------------------------------
小S野餐甜笑给拍照 沦为背景怒批:不受尊重 - Duration: 2:25.
For more infomation >> 小S野餐甜笑给拍照 沦为背景怒批:不受尊重 - Duration: 2:25. -------------------------------------------
Byli jsme v Ralsku! | Hledáme národní skautské tábořiště (1) #SvojsíkůvSen - Duration: 1:26.
For more infomation >> Byli jsme v Ralsku! | Hledáme národní skautské tábořiště (1) #SvojsíkůvSen - Duration: 1:26. -------------------------------------------
TPMP: Pamela Anderson va quitter DALS 9 d'après Cyril Hanouna - Duration: 8:21.
For more infomation >> TPMP: Pamela Anderson va quitter DALS 9 d'après Cyril Hanouna - Duration: 8:21. -------------------------------------------
CD-ROM, CD-R, CD-RW, Books of Red, Blue, Purple, Beige, Orange, Scarlet... - Duration: 17:16.
If you look at a blank CD-R, odds are you'll find these two numbers.
80 minutes of audio, and 700 megabytes of data.
You may be surprised to learn that these two numbers don't match.
See, let's take the 80 minute figure.
We know that the Compact Disc Digital Audio standard consists of 2 16 bit streams
(2 because it's stereo audio)
each consisting of 44,100 samples per second.
Let's make it a bit easier and say that it's one stream of 8 bit words or bytes,
so by doubling 44,100 twice
(once for stereo, once again to turn 16 bits into 8),
we find that it's 176,400 bytes per second.
Multiply that figure by 60 for sixty seconds per minute,
and again by 80 for our eighty minute runtime, and you get…
846,720,000 bytes.
It would seem that an audio CD holds over 146 more megabytes than a data CD.
What gives?
We interrupt this program for a marginally important message.
In the computing world there is an unfortunate mixing of the terms megabyte and mebibyte.
You'll almost never hear someone say mebibyte, because it's a silly word, but the 700 on
this disc is actually referencing mebibytes.
What's the difference?
A Megabyte is 1,000,000 bytes, based on powers of 10.
A mebibyte is based on powers of 2, so it is actually 2 to the 20th bytes.
So, a kibibyte is 1,024 bytes (rather than 1,000) and a mebibyte is 1,024 kibibytes.
This annoying debacle has been causing problems forever, for example hard drive manufacturers
quote sizes in gigabytes or terabytes, when your PC works in terms of gibibytes and tebibytes.
So this 2 terabyte portable drive only appears as 1.81 terabytes on my PC.
But my PC is actually misrepresenting this figure as terabytes when it is in fact tebibytes.
But CDs and DVDs are quoted in mebibytes and gibibytes, so even though this label shows
MB instead of the correct M lowercase i B, my computer does the same mislabeling, and
since they're both wrong, they agree.
Anyway, all of this is to say, I'll be using the word Megabyte, even though sometimes it's
actually a mebibyte.
Please send complaints to:
It would seem that an audio CD holds over 146 more megabytes than a data CD.
What gives?
Well it's actually more of a "what takes away" as the CD-ROM standard sacrifices
those bytes for more precise error correction.
As discussed in this channel's first video on the compact disc, the CIRC error correction
used in the Compact Disc Digital Audio standard can perfectly correct errors up to 3,500 bits long.
But, it can also mask errors up to 12,000 bits long through interpolation.
That means that it's essentially guessing what the audio samples should be for errors
between 3,500 bits and 12,000 bits.
Now, for audio samples, that's fine.
12,000 bits is less than one one hundredth of a second of audio, so even though the error
correction might be fudging things, you'll almost certainly not notice it.
But for data, that's not gonna do it.
Data cannot be fudged without serious consequences.
In order for the compact disc to store data files reliably, it would either need to sacrifice
durability or come up with a new error correction scheme.
And it did neither.
But also yes.
CD-ROMs
(or would that be CDs-ROM?)
use the same CIRC error correction and basic data
structure of the CD-Audio disc, including the frame structure, subcode, and all that.
But more error correction was added within the frame (which we've now formally decided
to call a sector).
Of the 2,352 bytes available in a sector on an audio CD, 304 get sacrificed, mostly for
error correction, but also for some basic signalling, such as synchronization and distinguishing
between mode 1 and mode 2.
Combined with an additional layer of CIRC error correction, the CD-ROM standard maintained
the same durability with zero tolerance error correction.
We'll get to Mode 2 later, but nearly all CD-Data applications use Mode 1 for its complete
error correction.
Now that the compact disc was being used for more than a simple linear stream of audio,
a true file system needed to be standardized.
Initially things were rather ad-hoc, but a group of 12 computer hardware manufacturers
met at what was then the High Sierra Hotel and Casino in Lake Tahoe, CA, where they settled
on a standard called the High Sierra Format.
Eventually this would become ISO 9660, the standard used to this day, however it has
been extended and improved over the years.
Now that the CD-ROM was officially a thing, whole new multimedia experiences could be created.
With the ability to store images, program files, sounds and even video, the possibilities
with CD-ROM were seemingly limitless.
No longer bound by the 1.44 megabytes of a 3.5 inch floppy, elaborate games with full-on
soundtracks, thousands of color images, and more complicated structure could be produced.
My greatest nostalgia factor comes from mid-nineties educational games, like the Magic School Bus
games or my personal favorite, JumpStart 3rd grade.
Seriously, this was a wicked awesome game and it's holding up pretty well I'd say.
[In another day, the world will see the dawning of Polly Planet.]
*buzz sound*
[Whoops!]
[It seems there's someone at the door.]
[Let's take a little peek!]
Anyway, of course home computers weren't the only beneficiaries of this sort of vast
data store.
Video game consoles soon appeared which could take advantage of it, in fact one of the earliest
was the Philips CD-i system.
It technically wasn't using CD-ROMs, though, as CD-i discs were in fact their very own
category, published in the Green Book.
But unless you're either very young or were living under a rock through the 1990's and
early 2000's, I'm sure you already knew what CD-ROMs could do.
But the OM, in that CD-ROM, man that's a bummer.
Sure, having 700 megabytes at your disposal is fantastic, but no one has a CD manufacturing
and duplication facility just at home.
But wait, they do!
The development of the CD-R, for Compact Disc Recordable, meant that no longer would you
be forced to write up a contract with a commercial CD pressing facility for at least 10,000 discs
just to make a mixtape, instead all you needed was a $35,000 machine and a computer!
It would take until the mid-to-late 90's for CD burners to come down in price, and
even then there were annoyances, but now we're really talking.
A CD-R, which incidentally is a pirate's favorite kind of CD, is constructed much the
same as a normal CD, but with two important changes.
First, the pits and lands molded into the polycarbonate layer are replaced with a continuous
spiral pregroove.
This spiral will guide the laser of a drive writing to a disc, and it also contains the
ATIP which tells the drive the properties of the disc, such as its maximum write speed.
Right on top of the pregroove is a thin layer of an organic dye.
That's why CD-Rs are sometimes a strange color, or even just a little bit off from
the normal silver.
Then on top of the dye, a partially transparent thin layer of metal, usually aluminum, is placed.
This allows the laser light to be reflected back while still being influenced by the dye.
To burn data on the disc, the laser switches from it's everyday gentle glow
to an all-out LIGHT CANNON
of FIRE LASER,
and the high intensity heats up the dye so much that its optical
properties change.
That's right, CD burners are literally burning the equivalent of pits onto the disc.
Once it's been written, almost any CD drive, going back to the earliest CD players, can
read these discs.
The parts of the dye that were made into a "pit" by the writing laser will dim the
reading laser's reflection, which is much the same as how real pits cause destructive
interference.
So long as the CD reader can tell the difference between a burned spot and an untouched spot,
it will read the data just fine.
Being able to store data files onto a compact disc at home meant that just one of these
guys could replace hundreds of floppy disks.
But now we had a new problem.
Remember how in a normal CD, there are three parts?
The Lead-in, program area, and lead-out?
Well, if we stuck to this limitation for the CD-R, then if you were to write as little
as a Word document on a blank CD,
you'll have written the lead-out,
and now the disc is done.
The Orange Book introduced the standard of multi-session writing.
Now, after the lead-out of the disc, another lead-in can be made.
Each time a new session is made, the lead-in is updated to include the location of all
the files.
On a multi-session disc, the drive will look for all of the lead-ins, and once it finds
the last one, it basically just ignores the rest.
This is also how a file can be "deleted" from a CD-R, as the latest lead-in may simply
not include it in the table of contents.
But the data is still physically there, and there are ways of getting to it.
Of course, the central limitation to the CD-R is that is a write-once, read many format.
In fact, its original name was going to be CD-Write Once, which I really wish had been
stuck with because we could have called them CD-WOs!
Woah!
But, we wouldn't be stuck with write-only for long.
Interestingly, the Orange Book detailed a rewritable CD based on magneto-optical technology
in 1990 (the technology behind the MiniDisc).
This never made it to commercial production, but the CD-MO would have been the perfect
companion to the CD-WO.
Instead, we got the CD-RW in 1997.
This is functionally identical to a CD-R, but the organic dye layer is replaced with
a Silver-Indium-Antimony-Tellurium alloy, also called by at least one person
AgInSbTe.
This alloy has a unique property which alters its reflectivity based on phase changes.
In an unburned disc, the alloy is in a polycrystalline structure.
But when the laser heats it to somewhere in the neighborhood of 500-700 degrees C, it
melts it.
And when it solidifies, it no longer has the same crystalline structure, and thus it reflects
light about 15-25% less intensely than the crystalline parts.
So, spots that are melted by the laser turn into sorta pits, and spots that aren't remain
sorta lands.
What allows the disc to be re-written is that when the alloy is heated to around 200 degrees C,
it doesn't melt, but any parts that have lost their polycrystalline structure will
actually reform.
This effectively erases all of the burned pits, and allows the disc to be written again.
CD-RWs have several severe limitations, though.
Unlike a CD-R, these discs generally cannot be read in standard drives.
Because the change in reflectivity between a pit and land is so slight, a CD reader needs
to be much more sensitive to pick up the data.
After the introduction of the CD-RW, many standard CD readers were made more sensitive
to accommodate them, sometimes branded as Multi-Read, but it certainly wasn't universal.
Another big problem of the CD-RW was that the discs weren't always backwards compatible.
Because of that phase-changing alloy, there is actually a minimum speed to write the disc.
This basic 1-4X disc will work in pretty much any drive, so long as you can force it to
burn slowly, but later, higher-speed discs might need a minimum speed of 8x or more,
so if you only had a 4x drive, you're SOL.
And before we put the CD to rest, let's look at some of the other stuff that those
crafty engineers at Sony and Philips jammed into here.
Remember the subcode channels R through W?
Eventually these would get used.
CD+G, for CD Graphics, was used in karaoke machines.
The first CD+G discs were released in 1985.
This was further refined into the CD+EG, standing for Extended Graphics.
In what seems backwards, it would take 11 years for Sony to introduce the CD Text format,
in 1996.
Also using the R through W subcode channels, this was essentially a way to add metadata
such as track titles, artists, album, and all that jazz.
Oddly, I can't find references to it being used for lyrics, which seems a wasted opportunity
as there definitely is room.
Remember the Mode 2 in CD-ROM I talked about earlier?
That's right, I'm putting it in the same video this time.
CD-ROM Mode 2 sacrificed some of the error correction of mode 1 for a larger data capacity,
about 800 megabytes.
You wouldn't want a computer program or documents stored in Mode 2, but for things
like video files or large collections of images where a small error will simply result in
a glitch or artifact, it was OK to use.
Video CDs, defined in the White book, used Mode 2, and now that I know that, VCDs make
a lot more sense to me.
The video compression of VCD is ridiculous, but knowing that it's actually playing with
800 megabytes makes it seem a little less crazy.
And there were other odds and ends.
The delightful
beige
book defined a standard for photo CDs in 1992.
The standard was a little ahead of its time though, as in 1992 CD-ROM drives really weren't
that common yet, and it also stored photos in a proprietary format.
Kodak developed the Photo CD in a time when digital cameras weren't really a thing at
all for consumers, so in a sense it was a very clever product.
Get your film developed and receive a disc with very high-resolution scans for future use.
But by the time CD-ROM drives became widespread, digital cameras were starting to appear.
And, once CD burners came down in price, well you could just burn JPEGs onto a CD (which,
you might recall, many DVD players can show as a slideshow on your TV).
You look back at Kodak's history and you just can't help but feel sorry for them.
And to round out the rainbow, the Blue Book of 1995 defined the Enhanced CD, which functioned
both as an Audio CD and a CD-ROM, with two sessions on a stamped disc.
This was kinda neat, as a CD player would treat it as a normal audio CD, but you could
store photos or interactive material in the data portion which a computer could access.
The Scarlet book of 1999 defined the standards of the Super Audio CD, a high-res audio format,
which is pretty much just a DVD but with audio only.
It also had significantly different audio encoding, which I won't go into right now,
and multi-channel support.
And the last of the rainbow books was the Purple Book of 2000, which if you thought
the Super Audio CD was obscure, well you haven't read the Purple Book.
All this was was a reduction in pit size and narrower spacing to double the data capacity
of a CD.
And, it was only for use as data storage, not audio.
But, when DVDs already existed, what was the point?
That's pretty much what everyone asked, and it was practically dead on arrival.
But an interesting thing about the purple book.
In a way, it had been implemented (although much more subtly) long before it was published.
See, the original Compact Disc standard was 74 minutes or 650 megabytes of data.
But, the vast majority of CD-Rs and CD-RWs you can buy are 80 minutes, 700 megabytes.
It was discovered not long into the life of the CD that the tolerances were generous enough
to space the tracks just a little bit tighter together without violating the Red Book specs.
The purple book just did that to a much more radical extent, but many years too late.
And finally, one thing you should know about pretty much all writable optical media.
The dyes and alloys aren't terribly stable.
Many of the earliest CD-Rs are failing, as the dye is degrading or the disc is delaminating.
If you have any precious data stored on optical media, you might want to back that up pretty soon.
Thanks for watching, I hope you enjoyed the video!
This just about wraps up the saga on the Compact Disc.
I think I hit all the bases, but I certainly didn't go into detail on everything.
If there's something more specific you'd like me to look into, let me know in the comments
and I'll see what I can do!
As always, thank you to everyone who supports this channel on Patreon.
I say this every time, but seriously.
Thank you.
Your support makes this channel possible, and you are awesome for it.
If you would like to join the Patreon crew to support the channel as well as get perks
like early video access, some occasional behind the scenes stuff, and the inside scoop on
the latest projects, please check out my Patreon page.
Thanks for your consideration, and I'll see you next time!
♪ exceptionally smooth jazz ♪
So long as the CD reader can tell the difference between a burned spot and an untouched spot,
it will read the data just fine.
I need to record that line because I screwed it up.
The development of the CD-R, for Compact Disc Recordable, meant that no longer… wait…
…
No that was right.
[clears throat] Let's try again!
...was replaced with a silver, indium, antinomy…
antiMOny, right?
It's Antimony?
Yeah.
Antimony Cricket!
And it also stored photos in a proprietary format Kodak developed….
AHH!
It technically wasn't using CD-ROMs, though, as CD-i discs were in fact their very own
category, published…
…
...in the green book.
-------------------------------------------
Senegal, The Socialist Party has never betrayed its course of action, the cries of a socialist! - Duration: 10:47.
[Music]
We remember you were in
your show for ethics we
went for a ride he thought
the best way to cope is to
turned to all the work
senghor there of the plain of game I have to
remind remind that at that time
the presence well montano remind
today is that they speak of
Senghor are those who know
under president senghor they failed
lived the era of senghor they failed
read the writings of senghor and although we
reads the writings whether they have not
including the writings of its hinges the by
the history of social housing had to
absorb several organizations
several political organizations
Today the partizan and absorb
several political parties of the time of
Senghor to abdou diouf time
so the present tight senghor tight
would be pleased today to see that
the Socialist party he created in
1948 continues always to fight
wanting to fight directly to be
fight for the interest of senegal for
the interest of the Senegalese for nation
the interest of the Republic for
consolidate this Republic which has
built to consolidate this State who
beat him up for what in any case that the
Senegalese are either either in whole
case and he can speak of Senegalese is
that is not a kind of
betrayal to voters because it
gives me actually I strip idea I have to
tell you I should tell you that in fact
and some terms that seems less
embarrassed North or in your words the party
Socialist never betrayed his line of
driving the party never has this service
Remember that it is a party of obedience
Socialist the Socialist Party must
never the Championship going to ousmane and
Indian stand and now and in
time said anything recently that
given its age it is not that they
make way for youth
He now works for letting me
my Socialist party he works
today for those who have 20 years 30
years of political career before I
hear me well here by want of us
let you leave ragged
This morning having good to let us in
Socialist Party conqueror my party
Socialist ready to face the
battles and this is what we off that
would be dying in part would be that in
less than six months before him more than one hundred
fifty thousand because the Member where I
think that the people speak in
our Socialist Party but it's not the
Socialist Party to which I belong
the Socialist Party to which me I me the
social party at which I am fighting to the
daily
the Socialist Party which I know I
know how much the militants at the door of the
party to buy spontaneously
the gap and come work with us I
dois vous rappeler qu'on a une instance
qui s'appelle vision socialiste c'est
une structure qui regroupe uniquement de
cadres celle ci regroupe aujourd'hui
plus de 200 cadres qui sont dans
l'administration centrale qui sont dans
la haute administration qui sont dans
les grandes entreprises qui sont dans
les instances internationales et qui
sont venus spontanément un plus de
lesage professionnel vous venir militer
au parti socialiste pour un idéal vous
pensez en partie qui comptent qui
fonctionne comme ça en partie aussi afin
que le parti socialiste s'est réparti
mourant les gens doivent arrêter de
tenir certains propos à l'égard du parti
socialiste
nous savons ce que nous sommes et nous
restons ce que nous sommes par contre
qu'à l'intérieur du sénégal ces régions
nous mettrons à dos côté nos intérêts
égoïstes et travaille uniquement pour
l'un truffe par le sénégal c'est ça
aujourd'hui le sens tout le sens tout le
sens de l'investiture de macky sall par
le parti socialiste comme candidat aux
élections présidentielles de 2012 le
parti socialiste est une doctrine le
parti socialiste une philosophie
on peut par en ligne de craie on peut
pas vendre une philosophie
les gens doivent arrêter de penser que
le parti seul ça a été je ne peux pas
vendre mon parti c'est parti de là part
tient à personne mais ça nous appartient
à nous tous sont partis dans lequel les
décisions sont prises par les instances
les décisions sont prises par les
militants et ousmane tanor dieng jamais
une seule fois il seule fois de nous
imposer une volonté même si les textes
du parti de lui permettent donc les gens
doivent apprendre à réfléchir de façon
de façon assez series et arrêter de
tenir certains vous allez à l'encontre
du parti socialiste
vous avez parlé de démocratie tout à
l'heure est ce qu'on peut dire que la
démocratie règnent au sein du parti
parce que des certains anciens du parti
se plaignent ils disent que ousmane
n'diaye après tout cela décision de
rejoindre l'autre et hakkar est alors
que son mandat à lui est terminée depuis
le 7 juin et de pourquoi ne pas faire un
autre congrès pour élire un secrétaire
général de toutes les façons s'il doit y
avoir au congrès ça sera avec les
membres du parti socialiste c'est qu'ils
ont plus dans le parti ne peuvent plus
participer à nos contrées ne faut plus
participer à nos instances sandales
précisé deuxième élément a précisé le
parti socialiste ne connaît pas le plus
ancien le nouveau que celui qui est
d'arriver dès lors que vous avez pris la
décision d'acheter la carte de membre du
parti et d'accepter de respecter les
règles fonctionnement du parti
vous avez les mêmes droits et les mêmes
prérogatives avec celui qui est là
depuis 1960
donc ce rapport qu'il s'agit dans ces
deux nouveaux ou le tout nouveau
nous avons tous les mêmes droits et les
mêmes obligations c'est de respecter les
instances du parti
c'est de respecter les décisions du
parti prise à l'issue de débats
démocratiques
je dois également rappelé le mode de
prise de décision dans la partie à
chaque fois qu'une question est agitée
et les poser au plus politique qui est
composé de plus de 200 membres
c'est même là qui composent le bureau
politique chacun d'entre eux est
responsable d'une coordination du niño
régionales où le mouvement affilié au
parti ces personnes là qui de façon
démocratique pour passer toute la
journée à échanger pour prendre une
décision mais si à l'issue de notre
décision
aucune décision majoritaire est prise
cette décision mazout est là qui sera la
décision du parti
la dernière en date a été celle par
laquelle le parti a souverainement
décidé d'investir macky sall comme
candidat aux élections présidentielles
c'est une décision qui a été prise de
façon démocratique
mélangez doit également
la fin du mandat de la fin des mandats
los montes en auriez je dois vous
remember that this morning did nothing was
elected in the month of June 2014 which we
speak expiration mona does
not even know what today
are the texts that organizes
functioning of the party
since 1 January 2018
we began the process of
renewal of proceedings
we sold meantime more
one hundred and fifty thousand membership cards
the general area after a circular
from September to
indicate the different comrades
bodies such as the process
renewal to take place and
process there and I think already triggered
that can not be solved in a
morning organized renewal
all instances of the social party
Committee says the congress elects a
new general yang secret process
respect it renews our committee
sections of our coordinations Our Unions
regional women's movement our
game motion movement's case
our movements wise before
convene a congress that will confirm to
now it is the election of the sector
General that I have to remind also
is made by call for applications
effecter party general appealed
for applications all he wanted
is that I was not going that they must
déposer et qu'on leur nominations
organizing a ballot at the bases
activists vote to elect the
general area that is the process
election
the general area of the party process
what can be done in a week
Omois that people keep saying we
the mandate of the General Ousmane sector
this mandate has expired is still ongoing
so there will not be another congress
where this mandate noryeva always continue
to be the general area of the party
[Music]
Yes
oh
oh
[Music]
[Music]
[Music]
[Music]
[Music]
[Music]
[Music]
-------------------------------------------
What Even Is Music? - Duration: 9:15.
this video is sponsored by Brilliant!
hey, welcome to 12tone! a while back, I made a video about whether or not rap counts as
music, and yes, it still does.
but working on that video got me thinking about a really important question: what is
music?
how do we define it?
I mean, sure, this is a question we've been debating for centuries, if not millennia,
but I'm pretty sure I can conclusively settle the debate in one youtube video.
it can't be that hard, right?
one popular answer comes from composer Edgard Varése, who described music as "organized
sound".
now, I do like how this answer allows for all sorts of different musical traditions,
but in the end I'm not really a fan. for starters, what does "organized" mean?
I think most people would agree that, say, the sound of waves crashing on a shore isn't
music, even though it has a clear pattern to it.
when we say organized sound, then, we actually mean sound organized intentionally, by an
intelligent being like a human.
this is still not great, though, because there's lots of stuff that meets that definition but
isn't generally considered music.
speech, for instance, is highly organized: right now, I'm carefully arranging a complex
series of phonemes in order to communicate a specific set of ideas.
in a sense, I think speech is actually too organized to be music: we've created semantic
meaning on top of those sounds, allowing us to convey more precise ideas than we could
with sound alone.
the process is no longer purely sonic: the sounds interact with previous experiences
and knowledge in order to create deeper meaning.
but we can't just rule out everything with a vocabulary, though, 'cause that same process
happens with music, too: to many listeners, this (bang) communicates the idea of sharks,
not because of anything inherently shark-y in the notes, but because of a shared cultural
experience.
in the end, I think "organized sound" is somehow both too precise and too vague to be a good
definition.
before I get to the answer I do like, though, I want to talk a bit about how I got there.
one thing that comes up a lot in these discussions is a John Cage piece called 4'33", where a
performer sits at their instrument and plays nothing for 4 minutes and 33 seconds.
the argument is that, if 4'33" is music, then clearly anything where anyone intentionally
makes any sort of noise can be music, and if you want to know more about the piece,
I've linked to some great videos on it in the description, but I actually don't really
like using it in this context, 'cause it feels like just taking a sledgehammer to the problem.
you're skipping to the end of the novel: sure, you know the conclusion, but you missed the
whole journey of getting there and you're left without a good understanding of what
it all means.
so instead of relying on the most blunt piece of anti-music out there to make our point,
let's take a trip through the world of experimental music and see what it has to teach us about
what music actually is.
in fact, let's start with another John Cage piece, Imaginary Landscapes no.
4. this is a piece written for 12 AM radios and 24 performers, half of which control the
stations while the other half control the volume and timbre. in a performance of the
piece, different radio stations fade in and out, seemingly at random but actually in very
specific patterns.
the structure of the sound is organized, but what actually comes out is entirely unpredictable.
some of the stations are playing other pieces of music, some are news reports, some are
commercials, and some, of course, are static.
what you get depends on where you are and when you play it.
the only constant is the actions taken by the performers.
so, is it music? because if it is, we're gonna have to expand our definition.
another piece I want to look at is Cornelius Cardew's Treatise, probably the magnum opus
of the entire graphic score movement.
we made a video about this before, but basically graphic scores are when you write music in
an intentionally unclear way, forcing the performer to provide their own interpretation
of whatever you wrote down.
Treatise is, at its heart, 193 pages of abstract shapes and drawings presented as a musical
score.
it comes with no instructions: if you want to perform it, you first have to determine
for yourself what the various elements mean. for instance, you might interpret larger shapes
as representing louder sounds, whereas I might read them as longer durations, or richer harmonies.
all of those interpretations are equally valid, because Cardew never specified any of it.
so the question is, is Treatise music?
like, any performance of it probably is, because at that point it's been converted into recognizable
sonic art, but is the score itself? it might seem strange to think of a score as a piece
of music on its own, but it's actually pretty common: like, I suspect most of you would
probably agree that Beethoven's 5th symphony is music.
and not just whatever orchestra you happen to see perform it: there's something about
Beethoven's 5th that makes it feel appropriate to describe it, in the abstract, as a piece
of music, whether or not we're actually listening to it.
the obvious explanation here is that every performance of it will sound largely the same,
so the score is music because it represents a specific series of sounds.
it may vary a little based on the performers' skill, the acoustics of the venue, and other
factors, but, more or less, Beethoven's 5th is Beethoven's 5th. that's not always the
case, though, which brings me to my next example, Terry Riley's In C. this is a piece for around
35 players, though Riley doesn't really care which instruments you use, and larger or smaller
orchestras are fine too.
the score consists of 53 melodic fragments, with each performer instructed to play each
fragment as many times as they personally want to before moving on.
tempo is left up to the performers' discretion, and Riley encourages you to drift in and out
of sync with each other rhythmically to create new and interesting patterns.
he warns against getting too far ahead or behind other players, but beyond that pretty
much the entire realization of the score is left in the hands of the performers.
thus, every performance of In C is fundamentally different, so the score can't be said to represent
any specific sounds.
the only hint of compositional structure is that Riley recommends a performance last around
45 minutes to an hour, and gives a few instructions on how to end the piece, so if In C is music
then a score doesn't have to always produce the same performance in order to be musical.
which brings us back to Treatise.
again, is it music?
while you're thinking about that, I'll move on to probably my favorite experimental piece:
Steve Reich's pendulum music.
here, a series of speakers are laid on the ground facing up, and microphones are set
to swing back and forth above them.
when the microphones get close to the speakers, they create feedback, and the different microphones
swinging at slightly different speeds creates a complex series of interconnected rhythms.
here, we see an almost complete lack of intentionality: the rhythms aren't planned, nor are they controlled
by a performer.
in fact, once the microphones are set swinging, there's no further human intervention at all
until the pendulums have completely stopped, hanging over their speakers and creating constant
feedback until the performers unplug the system.
for something so random, I think it's a pretty profoundly musical experience, but is it music?
well, at this point I think I'm pretty much ready to provide my definition, but before
that, let's take one last look at 4'33".
one argument I've seen is that it's better viewed not as music, but as performance art,
and I think there's a pretty good case there.
the problem, though, is that the point of that performance is that it's presented as
a piece of music.
it relies on our cultural understanding of what music is in order to work, and it falls
apart if you don't view it through that lens. without music, it's just someone sitting at
a piano.
with that in mind, the definition I like is based on a quote by Italian composer Luciano
Berio, who said that music is "everything that one listens to with the intention of
listening to music.''
I think this captures a lot of the ambiguity we've seen, and I like how it frames music
as experiential, created by the listener, rather than expressive, created by the composer
or performer.
I do take some issue, however, with its emphasis on intent: in Berio's framing, music can't
happen by accident.
you can't have an unexpectedly musical experience, you have to go into it with the expectation
of music or it doesn't count.
I don't know if that's his actual stance or if it's just a translation thing, but either
way, my personal definition is that music is anything that you experience as musical.
I know that sounds like a massive cop-out, but I hope by this point I've illustrated
why I think more rigid definitions are destined to fail.
the boundaries between music and non-music aren't actually clear enough to define, and
trying to precisely pin it down just opens you up to obvious counterexamples.
before we go, though, I do want to clarify something: I'm not saying that everything
is music.
what I'm saying is that everything can be music.
it's a subtle difference, but it's incredibly important.
when I make this claim, I often get people who argue I'm implying that, say, their washing
machine is music, or the conversation they had with their neighbor this morning is, but
I don't think any of that is music unless someone experienced it as such: if the sound
of your washing machine had a particularly rhythmic pattern to it and you found yourself
dancing, or if the prosody of your neighbor's voice took on noticeably melodic qualities
to your ear, then yes, it's music, but if not? it's just sound.
music is a quality we find in that sound, not for any inherent reason, but because we
put it there.
we give it meaning, which is what makes it mean something.
until then? it's just sound.
it's all just sound.
I love these sorts of questions because they require lots of complex reasoning to answer
meaningfully, and if you're into that sort of thing I'd recommend this video's sponsor,
Brilliant.
being a good music theorist means developing your critical thinking skills, and Brilliant
is a great place to do that.
they have all sorts of puzzles and quizzes to help teach you about math, science, and
most importantly, logic: I've been playing through their logic puzzles course recently,
and it's been both really fun and really informative.
it guides you from simple problem-solving into complex, multi-layered reasoning, all
with clear, helpful explanations to make sure you understand what you're doing.
it's fast-paced, covering the things it needs to cover without repeating itself over and
over, so once you've mastered a problem set you can quickly move on to more difficult
challenges.
they also have lots of other courses about things like math and computers, so if you
want to develop your skills or just learn more about Brilliant, you can go to brilliant.org/12tone
and sign up for free.
plus, the first 200 people to click that link will get 20% off their already-cheap annual
Premium subscription.
so yeah, check it out, and have fun learning!
and hey, thanks for watching, and thanks to our Patreon patrons for supporting us and
making these videos possible.
if you want to help out, and get some sweet perks like sneak peeks of upcoming episodes,
there's a link to our Patreon on screen now.
you can also join our mailing list to find out about new episodes, like, share, comment,
subscribe, and above all, keep on rockin'.
-------------------------------------------
Walk It Down - Talking Heads (1985) 96kHz/24bit FLAC 1080p Video ~MetalGuruMessiah~ - Duration: 4:53.
I...
am just a number
and I....
hang on to what I got
You...
say what you want to
but I...I...I...I
just try to stay alive
I..
put myself together
People say, get away,
somebody will turn you in
Life,
life
without surrender.
Togetherness...
ecstasy is what I need
I can laugh,
but I should cry
When love and understanding are the
ultimate crimes
I said...
Walk it down.
Talk it down.
(oh, oh, oh)
Sympathy
Luxury.
Somebody will take you there.
Walk it down.
Talk it down.
(oh, oh, oh)
Sympathy.
Luxury.
Somebody will take you there.
She...
says she remembers.
Time...
long time ago.
We...
belong together.
I...I...I...I
turn up the radio
Lies,
lies and propaganda
I...
gonna tell you what I need
Life,
life,
without surrender
Togetherness...
ecstasy is what I need
I got yours
and you got mine
And I can swim,
but I should fly
I've been
Walk it down.
Talk it down.
(oh, oh, oh)
Sympathy.
Luxury.
Somebody will take you there.
Walk it down.
Talk it down.
(oh, oh, oh)
Sympathy.
Luxury.
Somebody will take you there.
Ain't no crime to believe
I took my money,
I bet my life
What you see is what you get
But it sure ain't what we need.
Hey!
Walk it down.
Talk it down.
(oh, oh, oh)
Sympathy.
Luxury.
Somebody will take you there.
Walk it down.
Talk it down.
(oh, oh, oh)
Sympathy.
Luxury.
Somebody will take you there
Walk it down
Talk it down.
(oh, oh, oh)
Sympathy.
Luxury.
Somebody will take you there
Walk it down.
Talk it down.
(oh, oh, oh)
Sympathy.
Luxury.
Somebody will take you there
-------------------------------------------
Cheat Codes, Little Mix - Only You (SonuX Remix) [Lyrics] - Duration: 3:03.
♪ Dancing with your silhouette ♪
♪ In the places that we met ♪
♪ Ooh, tryna find you in the moon ♪
♪ Paris never feels the same ♪
♪ When the streets all call your name ♪
♪ Ooh, so I hide in crowded rooms ♪
♪ And I'll follow right down the river ♪
♪ Where the ocean meets the sky ♪
♪ To you ♪
♪ To you ♪
♪ Once upon a time we had it all ♪
♪ Somewhere down the line we went and lost it ♪
♪ One brick at a time we watched it fall ♪
♪ I'm broken here tonight ♪
♪ And darling no one else can fix me ♪
♪ Only you ♪
♪ Only you ♪
♪ Oh no one else can fix me ♪
♪ Only you ♪
♪ Only you ♪
♪ Only you ♪
♪ Oh no one else can fix me ♪
♪ Only you ♪
♪ Did I let go of your hand ♪
♪ For a castle made of sand ♪
♪ Ooh, that fell into the blue ♪
♪ I went following the sun ♪
♪ To be alone with everyone ♪
♪ Ooh, looking 'round a crowded room ♪
♪ And I'll follow right down the river ♪
♪ Where the ocean meets the sky ♪
♪ To you ♪
♪ To you ♪
♪ Once upon a time we had it all ♪
♪ Somewhere down the line ♪
♪ We went and lost it ♪
♪ One brick at a time we watched it fall ♪
♪ I'm broken here tonight ♪
♪ And darling no one else can fix me ♪
♪ Only you ♪
♪ Only you ♪
♪ And no one else can fix me ♪
♪ Only you ♪
♪ Only you ♪
♪ Only you ♪
♪ And no one else can fix me ♪
♪ Only you ♪
-------------------------------------------
In 8 Years Obama Never Got US #1 World Economic Ranking. Only Took Trump 2 Years - Duration: 3:57.
For more infomation >> In 8 Years Obama Never Got US #1 World Economic Ranking. Only Took Trump 2 Years - Duration: 3:57. -------------------------------------------
Ce Britannique RISQUE 10 ans de Prison en Thaïlande pour GRAFFITI ( Scouser Lee story ) [ EN Subs ] - Duration: 1:34.
Hi it's SAI, i hope you are well, today we're dealing with an unusual story today, it's been published in english media in the early afternoon ,
and it tells us the huge mistake of Lee Furlong, Liverpool resident, currently in Thailand.
His crime was filmed by a surveillance camera at 4am, we see it quietly paint spraying the wall of a fortress built in the 13th century,
he would have written "scousse lee", instead of writing "scouser Lee" which means he's a LiverPool resident.
He explains himself by saying that all day he drank like a hole after receiving bad news from his family. Then he saw then a spray of paint,
right here innocently, took it and he did not know what he was doing with it.
When he woke up the police was there, they took him to the station and he was in shock.
He is terrified of what can happen next
because he may be sentenced guilty to up to 10 years in prison and / or a fine of £ 23,500 for the degradation of a historic site.
His teammate has been arrested too for paint spraying a "B" on the wall.
Last detail, his "visa" run out of time in 2 days...So i don't know how it is going to end... i feel terrified for him too..
-------------------------------------------
The New Amazon Echo Plus Review - 2nd Generation Echo Plus - Duration: 10:53.
hello everyone thanks for tuning in again I'm ready to get started with my
review of the Amazon echo plus second generation device and of course as
you're going through a device like this you can't forget its competitor so let's
go through it right now first up is cost now of course the Amazon echo plus
second generation is the exact same cost as the first generation this is what
we're seeing with the Amazon echo dot third generation where the price
matching from the previous generation is going on so this device is a hundred and
forty nine dollars same as this one was originally when it was sold and to date
now in comparison here to the Google home which is I would say its main
competitor this device is a hundred and twenty nine dollars u.s. now whenever
you're buying a smart home speaker I think first and foremost what you want
to know is how is the speaker all three of these devices are going to be
excellent but in my tests of these three devices this is the best speaker here
and what I'll say is from the first generation echo plus to the
second-generation plus here what has happened is there is a slightly larger
woofer here in this device so this was a 2.5 inch and this is a three inch woofer
here and so what that does is gives you that extra low-end or bass sound that a
lot of people are looking for from their home theater system now of course it's
actually important for you to actually hear how these all sound so let me put
them all next to each other give you a demo of that
all right so there you go I think you could see that in general these devices
were pretty close all three of them were pretty close in terms of quality and in
terms of loudness they're all very close as well but ultimately in my tests here
this speaker is a excellent listening speaker I know it's a little heavy on
that low-end but you can actually adjust that using your application on your
phone and a number of other ways you can actually control it through the voice
assistant so you know that ability to control the bass and the treble here
with the echo plus I think makes this the best speaker in the class one other
thing to talk about in terms of speaker quality this device is able to pair with
another echo or another echo plus and also the echo sub and then turn into
that two point one theater system and you know I have the sub now here in my
home and I can tell you from what I've been listening to it's pretty amazing to
actually get those devices all working together by comparison neither of these
two devices can do that that hasn't been promised for the first generation of
echo pluses and Google really has zero response in terms of a two point one
system like that and I think Amazon over time is going to be able to take that
further and further since they've already created it I wonder if we're
gonna hit 5.1 systems very very soon the next thing to talk about here is the
home automation capability now between the Amazon echo plus first generation in
the second generation there's very little
difference what happens here is both of these devices have what's called a
ZigBee hub in them and so you don't know what a ZigBee hub does for you or what
it means the ZigBee hub gives you the capability of controlling ZigBee
protocol enabled devices directly using this where the comparison happens here
is the Google home is unable to connect directly so for a system like Samsung
smartthings you can connect the sensors directly to
your echo plus either the first or the second generation whereas with the
Google home Mini you're going to need the Samsung smartthings hub in order to
connect those devices to it so that little differential is actually quite
significant when you think about all the different hubs that are out there today
little caveat to all of this if you want Philips you you're still going to need
the hub but where a differential exists is for example like a single bulb or
again like I said Samsung smartthings now on top of that there's one
differential here between the first and second generation what basically happens
here is there's a temperature sensor on board with this second generation of
echo plus that was not there in the first generation and so you can ask this
device right here anytime you'd like what the temperature is in this device
or at this device so that gives you the opportunity to get another temperature
sensor in your home at the same cost as this the echo plus 2 temperature is 22
point three degrees now in terms of look and feel I think there's some pretty big
differences here across the board but ultimately the Amazon echo plus first
generation is obviously the largest and the most you know prominent device here
what amazon has done is they basically paid attention to what Google is doing
this is not a prominent device it's not standing out as much as it possibly can
instead this device is trying to hide and also blend in a little bit with the
surroundings and that's what I'd say Amazon has done with this the new cloth
fabric clearly they've been moving in that direction
since the second generation of Amazon echo devices we now see the echo dot
third-generation with that same cloth finish I really like it and I think it
softens the whole look the other thing is you notice the height is very similar
between the Google home and the Amazon echo plus second generation it's about
half or just a little over half the size you can see the thickness and again if I
kind of line these two up very close in terms of their stature so overall in
terms of look I think this is a real upgrade for Amazon in terms of their
echo plus second generation and I think the lessons that they've kind of taken
over the last few years have been well learned on top of all of that and let me
show you a little bit of a difference here the Amazon echo plus here basically
has one microphone there in the middle and then there's an arrangement
underneath the surface now when you compare that with this new Amazon echo
plus you can see the arrangement rate there is quite different so there's
actually a whole number of microphones and they're on the top of the speaker
now what I think that does for Amazon in this case is it helps with clarity and
understanding of queries commands and those other things that people are
saying to the device the reason I say that is actually I've been testing this
device out for a few days now and what I found every day is that this device is
understanding me much better and with more noise in the room now still when
you go ahead and you fill the room with the sound the the music that is capable
out of this device it's not going to hear you very well you're still going to
have to yell at it there's really no way around that the far-field microphones
that are on here just cannot compensate for that much sound going on in the room
so it hasn't eliminated that but when it dims that audio or it lowers that audio
for me what I've noticed is that it is understanding me better than the first
generation device so I think ultimately what this is going to do is push this
new series of echo devices closer and closer to the accuracy that we see with
a Google home and the Google assistant so if you've been reading lots of those
reports overall what happens is the Google assistant understands a hundred
percent of the questions it's being asked and I actually think sometimes
this voice assistant here and I'm not going to say the name but this a voice
assistant struggles with hearing actually and I think that was always
somewhat partly at fault or what was that fault here was the microphone
arrangement so what I'm noticing here is the clarity and the understanding is
much better in the echo plus second generation alright now one last thing to
talk about here the new application that controls all of this and again it's
named for the voice assistant so I'm not going to say it but that new application
has been redesigned and the new redesign is significantly better than the
previous version of the application so I think when you go out and you buy this
speaker now you're getting a much better experience on your phone or your tablet
and in terms of your control capability within this system so overall yes you
can get that application and use it here on the first generation but ultimately
it is significantly improved and over time we're of course going to see more
and more of the functionality be limited to just this second generation device
not the first generation so there you go everyone I think that's a pretty good
review here obviously we have a lot of upgrades from that first generation and
in general I think you have very close devices here obviously stay tuned to the
channel as I go through a full comparison review of these three devices
that will be coming next and then you're going to see the echo sub coming rate
after that now of course I'd like you all to subscribe join up with the
channel as I go through all these new devices from Amazon and of course you're
going to see the continued advancement of all of our tutorials for all of your
home nation needs so everyone thanks for
watching and we'll see you next time
you
-------------------------------------------
Le comédien Pete Davidson se serait "concentré sur lui-même" après la scission d'Ariana Grande - Duration: 4:13.
For more infomation >> Le comédien Pete Davidson se serait "concentré sur lui-même" après la scission d'Ariana Grande - Duration: 4:13. -------------------------------------------
Nightcore - Run Away (Lyrics) - Duration: 1:55.
Lyrics on the screen :)
-------------------------------------------
That Distant Shore (Steven Universe) 【Tourmaline the Whale】 - Duration: 1:58.
It all became so lovely,
Those bluest skies above me,
Those funny feelings
I had never felt
before I met you.
[ Instrumental ]
I thought I'd stay a while,
I tried to learn to smile,
So many colors
I had never even known...
Maybe I'll find myself sitting
on that distant shore...
Maybe I'm not alone.
[ Instrumental ]
Then I see the colors fading,
Gentleness of light escaping,
Shadows of my fear invading,
Have I seen this all before?
I know...
that there's something residing,
A terror deep inside me,
I couldn't understand how,
you could be so bold...
Maybe I'll find myself smiling
on that distant shore...
Maybe I'm not alone...
-------------------------------------------
J'AI RENCONTRÉ DES BELGES TROP MARRANT SUR FORTNITE Battle Royale - Duration: 9:10.
For more infomation >> J'AI RENCONTRÉ DES BELGES TROP MARRANT SUR FORTNITE Battle Royale - Duration: 9:10. -------------------------------------------
My fishing challenge - Duration: 5:21.
Yo everyone,
today, its a special day
challenge day
the goal is to catch a fish with a little peculiar luring
try to catch a fish with a sponge , so the SPONTEX base wiper
Goal was to catch a fish, whether it was a pike , a perch, a predator preferred
I'm going to take a sponge, basic sponge SPONTEX
cutting in half is too much wide
here you go
here you go and a tail
therefore
about there
hop hop
it's gone, I hope 7 g will suffice
already have to soak up the brothel
it is huge
it has a small effect!
a pole that is come and see what it was like
to the two aspers who came to see, two large aspen
but Nan
good guys you think I'm going to catch a fish or not?
so there is a fish that is sufficiently strong to rub a sponge?
that's what we're going to see in this fishing report, sponge-free
2 hours Later
go for a little fish
Fish! Fish! Fish! A Perch
yes
taken! Nice! how it works
beautiful little pole
with
that's what it is
if that is not huge!
go ahead with the release
pretty little pole
yes
how the sponge can work too!
guys give up a max of like for this made-up luring house; house
subscribe if you are not yet Subscriber and I'm telling you Bah the next
Ciao
-------------------------------------------
Superar el MIEDO a las CRÍTICAS (3 propuestas) - Duration: 4:31.
For more infomation >> Superar el MIEDO a las CRÍTICAS (3 propuestas) - Duration: 4:31. -------------------------------------------
Temel Kavramlar Konu Anlatımı | Bölüm 5 | Son Ders Akademi - Duration: 19:42.
For more infomation >> Temel Kavramlar Konu Anlatımı | Bölüm 5 | Son Ders Akademi - Duration: 19:42. -------------------------------------------
Babar, tonton, sphynx...Ces curieux surnoms des hommes politiques - Duration: 11:15.
For more infomation >> Babar, tonton, sphynx...Ces curieux surnoms des hommes politiques - Duration: 11:15. -------------------------------------------
Mélenchon : "Pas de justice politique, mais une justice déséquilibrée" - Duration: 12:02.
For more infomation >> Mélenchon : "Pas de justice politique, mais une justice déséquilibrée" - Duration: 12:02. -------------------------------------------
L'imitation de l'accent du Sud par Jean-Luc Mélenchon est discriminatoire - Duration: 6:04.
For more infomation >> L'imitation de l'accent du Sud par Jean-Luc Mélenchon est discriminatoire - Duration: 6:04. -------------------------------------------
Koopappartement: Bergsingel 9 f, Rotterdam - Duration: 1:04.
For more infomation >> Koopappartement: Bergsingel 9 f, Rotterdam - Duration: 1:04. -------------------------------------------
What Is Your Riskalyze Number - Duration: 4:15.
For more infomation >> What Is Your Riskalyze Number - Duration: 4:15. -------------------------------------------
🚗CarVlog #1 - Prowadzę i komentuję! 😱Nowa seria! 🍁NASTY🍁 - Duration: 4:48.
For more infomation >> 🚗CarVlog #1 - Prowadzę i komentuję! 😱Nowa seria! 🍁NASTY🍁 - Duration: 4:48. -------------------------------------------
The Sci-Fi Writer Who Predicted the Internet and Invented the Waterbed - Duration: 2:38.
For more infomation >> The Sci-Fi Writer Who Predicted the Internet and Invented the Waterbed - Duration: 2:38. -------------------------------------------
Volkswagen Golf 2.0 GTD AUTOMAAT / Origineel NL AUTO / Full Option - Duration: 1:14.
For more infomation >> Volkswagen Golf 2.0 GTD AUTOMAAT / Origineel NL AUTO / Full Option - Duration: 1:14. -------------------------------------------
Homemade Blueberry Muffins || From Scratch! - Duration: 1:40.
Blueberry Muffins
1 3/4 cup flour
1/3 cup sugar
2 teaspoons baking powder
1/4 teaspoon salt
1 egg
3/4 cup milk
1/4 vegetable oil
3/4 cup blueberries
400 °F for 18 to 20 minutes
Cool 5 minutes
No comments:
Post a Comment