Sunday, May 7, 2017

Youtube daily report May 8 2017

Wink, J. (2011). Critical Pedagogy: Notes From the Real World, (Fourth Edition p.93-99)Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education.

For more infomation >> Karl Marx, Conclusion of project Catherine Martinez - Duration: 2:15.

-------------------------------------------

''Look at you, you are amazing!'' ((BONUS LEVEL-UP)) - Duration: 16:41.

That's beautiful

where are you from, Karina?

I'm Armenian, but not exactly from Armenia. I'm from the neighbor of Armenia- Georgia.

oh

you cut tags?

next time don't cut tags

because it looks like you used them

I'm just helping you

OK

all tags are cut?

((GEORGIAN)) Greetings

((GEORGISN)) Greetings

how do you know?

((GEORGIAN)) The Georgian language

how do you know?

I know a little bit of Georgian

from where?

hhahahahha

No, why do you know?

I study different languages

Ah, you study different languages

he speaks all

very nice

that's very interesting, very nice

usually, people don't like it

you give me a job, you see

you speak Georgian and Armenian. Do you speak any other languages?

I speak Russian very well

((RUSSIAN)) Hi!

LOOK AT YOU!

((RUSSIAN)) Do you speak Russian?

((RUSSIAN)) Yes, I speak

((RUSSIAN)) Of course!

look at you!

((RUSSIAN)) It's difficult to learn...

You have an accent, but you speak very well

OMG!

LOOK AT YOU!

((RUSSIAN)) Yes, yes..I like....

look at him..

((RUSSIAN)) I like to learn many languages

perfect, perfect

he said that he likes to learn different languages

can you believe it....

Look at this...what's going on with you now. He's good, but you're bad

LLOLOLOL!!!

look at thee pants...he worse these pants

look at them, they're wrinkled, too

what did you say to her?

((RUSSIAN)) Not bad

but I tell you that you're bad

hahahaha'

she's just kidding

it's OK

I will return this, but you can't wear stuff then return it.

you cannot do this

somebody tell you that you can?

no

You wore this, look at it

((RUSSIAN)) Sorry

he apologizes

for you

very good, you're good. Did you study somewhere?

((RUSSIAN)) I learned Russian in my home

((RUSSIAN)) I don't have a teacher now, but I had a good teacher a long time ago

((RUSSIAN)) In Russian

((RUSSIAN)) But he went back to Russian because his mom was sick

((RUSSIAN)) He wasn't a citizen

((RUSSIAN))Yes

((RUSSIAN)) Why?

((RUSSIAN)) I see

just for you I'm going to do it

lololol

((RUSSIAN)) Very interesting

he speaks very well

I mean, he has an accent, but very nice

very good, GOOD JOB!

how long did you, uh..

((RUSSIAN)) Two years

((RUSSIAN)) At home

((RUSSIAN)) I have a lot of books...

you impress me, I have to tell you, very nice

first time I see somebody like you

My husband is an American man and he knows nothing....

((RUSSIAN)) I love

((RUSSIAN)) For foreigners

((ARMENIAN)) Armenian

((ARMENIAN)) I can speak a little Armenian

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!

((ARMENIAN)) I can speak a little Armenian

((RUSSIAN)) Perhaps, perhaps...

((RUSSIAN)) My brother

((RUSSIAN)) Chinese

((RUSSIAN)) I speak Chinese

**LANGUAGE SPIDER SENSE IS TINGGLING!**

((KOREAN)) Are you Korean?

((KOREAN)) How are you?

((KOREAN)) I can speak Korean

((KOREAN)) Your Korean is good

((KOREAN)) You're being too nice

ahhahahaahhaha

((KOREAN)) Where..

((KOREAN)) From where did you learn?

((KOREAN)) I learned by myself

((KOREAN)) By yourself?

((KOREAN)) But lately I haven't really being studying it that much

((KOREAN)) How long have you learned for?

((KOREAN)) 2 years

((KOREAN)) 2 years?

((KOREAN)) Where in Korea are you from?

((KOREAN)) Is that in the south?

((KOREAN)) Nice to meet you

((KOREAN)) Have a good day

((KOREAN)) Have a good day

**LEARNING LANGUAGES IS A DAMN SUPERPOWER,MAN**

''I told you that I speak everything''

((RUSSIAN)) I know

((RUSSIAN)) I think that everybody should know 2 languages

((RUSSIAN)) Thank you very much!

((RUSSIAN)) Thank you!

((ARMENIAN))Thank you

((GEORGIAN)) Thank you

((RUSSIAN)) I'm a teacher

((RUSSIAN)) Fishing

((RUSSIAN)) Thank you

((RUSSIAN)) You're welcome

((RUSSIAN)) Nice to meet you

((RUSSIAN)) Likewise

hahahahahahaha

((RUSSIAN)) Pronunciation

((RUSSIAN)) Nice to meet you

((RUSSIAN)) See you later

((KOREAN)) Goodbye

((KOREAN)) Goodbye

For more infomation >> ''Look at you, you are amazing!'' ((BONUS LEVEL-UP)) - Duration: 16:41.

-------------------------------------------

Use of One Versus Two Time Points for Calibration of Land Change Models - Duration: 10:27.

Controversy abounds within

the field of land change modeling

concerning the number if time points to

use when calibrating extrapolation models.

This video explains the difference

between using one time point

versus two time points for calibration.

This research is based on

Jessica McDermott's Masters thesis supervised

by Professor Pontius.

This video is presented by Sara

Brown and Carly Robbins.

We illustrate the principles with a case

study using the

Long Term Ecological Research Network's

Plum Island Ecosystems site

located in northeastern

Massachusetts.

We use the land change model

GEOMOD

to show the concepts.

GEOMOD is a module

in the TerrSet software available from

Clark Labs.

For more information on GEOMOD,

please see the other videos in the series.

A one time point calibration requires

a dependent variable at

one time point,

in this case built versus non-built at 2011,

as pictured on the left.

Built at 2011 is black,

and non-built at 2011 is gray.

We use one independent variable,

in this case surficial geology

to explain the transition

to non-built to built.

Geology is appropriate because

we suspect builders

consider geology

when deciding where to build,

and geology is consistent over long

temporal extents.

The map on the right shows four geology types. GEOMOD

calibrates a suitability value for each

geology type. The suitability

of a certain geology type

for the transition to built

is equal to the size of built

on a geology type divided

by the size of

that geology type. A two

time point calibration requires a

dependent variable of the change

between two time points,

in this case the gain of built versus

the persistence of non-built

from 2001 to 2011.

The map on the left displays

the gain of built in red and the persistence of non-built

in gray. Built at 2001 is

in black, and is eliminated from the analysis,

because built pixels at 2001

are not pixels that can

experience gain of built

during 2001 to 2011.

Again, GEOMOD calibrates a

suitability value for each

geology type.

For the two time point calibration method,

the suitability of a

certain geology type for transition

to built is equal to

the size of gain of built on

a geology type divided by the

size of that geology type that is not

built at 2011.

This equation differs from the

one time point calibration

because the two time point method

excludes the region that was already

built at 2011.

The figure on the left shows the suitability

values from the

one time point calibration approach.

This figure displays the percentage of each

geology type

that is covered with built

at 2011.

The black dotted line indicates that 42

percent of the spacial extent

is built at 2011.

The figure on the right shows

the gain of built from 2001 to

2011 as a percentage

of each geology type that was

non-built at 2011

and that experienced a gain of built

from 2001 to 2011.

The black dotted line indicates

that 5 percent of non-built

at 2011 transitioned

to built from 2001 to

2011.

The longest bar in each graph

shows the category that

is the most suitable for future change according to

each calibration method.

The one time point approach on the left

shows that gravel has

the highest built percentage.

The two time point approach on the right

shows that bedrock

has the highest built percentage.

GEOMOD uses these percentages

to create suitability maps,

which the next slide shows.

The figure on the left shows the

one time point calibration suitability map

where gravel has the highest

suitability for future gain of built.

The map on the right shows the

two time point calibration suitability map,

where bedrock has the highest suitability

for future gain of built.

Linear extrapolation of the gain of built

from 2001 to 2011

implies that the Plum Island Ecosystems

would transition from 42 percent

built at 2011

to 66 percent built

over a duration of 75 years.

GEOMOD allocates this quantity

of the gain of extrapolated built

at the non-built pixels that have the

largest suitability values.

We performed

two runs of GEOMOD:

one run using

the one time point suitability map

and a second run using

the two time point suitability map.

This map is an overlay of the two output maps

from the two GEOMOD runs.

Black is built at 2011. Gray is

non--built persistence using both calibration methods.

Yellow is gain of built using

the two time point calibration method.

Red is gain of built using

the one time point

calibration method.

There is no intersection between the

extrapolated gain of built using the

one time point method

and from the two time point method.

This demonstrates how

the method of calibration

can have a dramatic influence

on the extrapolation.

The one time point calibration method

is based on the state of the landscape

at a single time point,

which reflects the accumulation of

extremely long term trends.

The allocation of built

at a one time point reflects the decisions

concerning where humans have built from

a time prior

to human settlement.

In our study area, humans

have historically concentrated

built on gravel. The two time point calibration method

is based on

the change of the landscape

of the landscape between two time points

which reflects much shorter term

trends. In our study area,

humans have concentrated recent gains

of built on bedrock.

The number of time points

can make a difference in calibration

and extrapolation.

One time point can give a stronger calibration

because the implied temporal extent

is from the natural

non-built state to the one time point.

Two time points

can give a weaker signal for calibration

because the two time point method

focuses exclusively

on change between two recent time points.

The appropriate number of

time points depends on the purpose of the model

and the stationarity of the

change processes. If the

recent change processes are stationary

with the historical processes,

then we recommend you use the

one time point calibration method

because the one time point calibration

tends to use a

stronger empirical signal.

If the recent growth trends

are expected to continue and are

non-stationary with the historical processes,

then we recommend

the two time point calibration.

When in doubt, use both

methods to show how much difference it makes.

The National Science Foundation supported

this work via the Long Term Ecological Research Network's Plum Island Ecosystems

The Massachusetts Office

of Geographic Information and the

Land Cover Database supplied

the data.

Here is our contact information.

For more information on GEOMOD

and TerrSet, please visit

www.clarklabs.org.

Please see more

videos on Professor

Pontius' website,

and may all your modeling experiences

be insightful.

For more infomation >> Use of One Versus Two Time Points for Calibration of Land Change Models - Duration: 10:27.

-------------------------------------------

( English Action Thriller Movies ) English Action Movies 2017 Full Movie | English Subtitle Movies - Duration: 2:00:50.

Subscribe Us

For more infomation >> ( English Action Thriller Movies ) English Action Movies 2017 Full Movie | English Subtitle Movies - Duration: 2:00:50.

-------------------------------------------

Michael Moore Admits He Hates Trump So Much That He'd Rather Have North Korea Nuke Us To Death - Duration: 2:30.

Michael Moore Admits He Hates Trump So Much That He'd Rather Have North Korea Nuke Us

To Death

We all knew that Michael Moore hates President Trump.

But he just made it clear that he would rather have North Korea bomb us to death than live

in a country under Trump.

In an interview with MSNBC's Chris Hayes, Moore gave an answer so extreme that even

MSNBC's reporter were furious.

"When I read the news from North Korea there was another missile test that failed, we'll

be getting probably some official statements on that.

I find myself genuinely rooting for [Trump} to handle the Korean situation well, I mean

there's all sorts of areas where I am, you are rooting for the man to be competent and

effective," said Hayes.

Yes, even if you don't like President Trump, it should be common sense that you want him

to stop another country from launching missiles at us.

However, Michael Moore disagreed.

"I don't know if I agree with that," said Moore.

"You're not rooting him to deal with North Korea well?!"

Hayes screamed back.

"It's like rooting for a six-year-old who suddenly swiped his dad's car and figured

out how to take it down the road.

I'm not rooting for the six year old to get on the highway and drive that car!

I want the six year old off the highway, that's essentially what we got.

Just the implication of what you're saying means that he could possibly find a sane way

and a safe way to figure out how to deal with it," explained Moore.

"I would like to avoid nuclear war and I'm fervently hoping that the president of the

United States navigates us in a safe direction away from that," responded Hayes.

"Well, you got the wrong person," said Moore.

Wow.

Check out the video below.

For more infomation >> Michael Moore Admits He Hates Trump So Much That He'd Rather Have North Korea Nuke Us To Death - Duration: 2:30.

-------------------------------------------

3 Conversation Topics That Ruin Relationships - Duration: 4:28.

Hey YouTube, my name is Amy North and today I want to talk about specific conversations

that ruin new relationships.

For those of you who don't know me I'm a relationship coach from the west coast of

Canada, and over the last few years I've been working with women around the world to

improve their love lives.

Today I want to take it from the top and talk about three topics that end relationships

before they even have the chance to blossom.

In other words, talks that kill your chances are going the distance with a new partner.

Now you may be asking yourself why it is that I'm stressing "new" relationships and

"early" days and that's because unlike couples who have been together for a while

and know one another well, certain topics can drive away your new love interest because

they haven't gotten the chance to know you well enough just yet.

You'll understand what I mean better in a moment.

Now before I jump into this I would like to quickly ask that if you enjoy what you learn

here today then please take a moment to subscribe to my YouTube channel.

There you will be able to check out more of my dating advice videos and I'd really appreciate

the support.

So please, keep that in mind while watching this video.

Alright, let's get started.

So the first conversation that can ruin a new relationship is one that goes something

like this.

You and your guy are chatting and he mentions a female he knows, be it a friend, colleague,

whoever.

But, instead of listening to his story you start asking yourself who this woman is, and

questions their relationship.

Has he hooked up with her?

Is he attracted to her?

The works.

Unfortunately this feeling of worrying comes on so strongly that you end up asking him

these questions.

The problem here is two-fold.

If he says yes then you are going to never want him to be around her, regardless of how

long ago their rendezvous happened.

If he says no, well, you're probably going to question it still, and may even convince

yourself that he's lying to avoid you getting jealous.

Not to mention how insecure you'll look, and how awkward that conversation may be.

So, really, this conversation is a lose lose and if it gets out of hand, well, I hate it

say it but you can kiss your relationship goodbye.

Instead of letting these thoughts get the best of you realize that what is in the past

is in the past.

It can't be changed or undone, so don't let it ruin what you have presently.

The second kind of conversation to avoid early in a relationship is the one about wanting

kids.

Sure, there is an innocent way to go about this, but telling the guy you're seeing

that you want to have children by a certain age or deadline can be a dead breaker… not

to mention the pressure it puts on him if that end date is near!

Instead of telling him your big picture plans, if the topic comes up simply say, "Yeah,

that's something I can see myself wanting down the road" or "It's a possibility."

Really you don't have to tell him yes or no at all right now, instead keep it vague

and roll with it.

The point is to avoid seeming baby crazy.

Why?

Because it could send him running, or even make him question how far you're willing

to go to make that dream happen.

At the same time, if he brings it up and shares all this thoughts and plans regarding children

then feel free to get on board and tell him honestly you're feeling towards having kids.

That said, just be sure not to say anything that is going to make him feel uncomfortable.

The same rule can be applied when discussing marriage early on in the relationship.

Alright now my third and final conversation to avoid in the beginning of your relationship

is the dreaded "my ex" conversation.

While it may seem easier to talk about your dating history earlier on in the relationship

— before you become too emotionally involved with one another — talking about your ex

at the start of a new relationship is rarely a good thing.

Again, there's a lose-lose here.

For instance, you either speak of your ex in a high regard and your new man will think

that you're not over your ex, OR you bash them, say how much of a loser he was and blame

him for your demise and he again, thinks you're not over him, or he worries that you'll

speak poorly of him down the road, too.

To avoid this from happening don't bring up exes.

If for some reason they do come up keep your comments short and sweet.

Don't make it seem like your past relationships were a huge deal, and when possible, change

the subject.

If your new man does ask you what happened with your last relationship, or why it didn't

last, simply say that you wanted different things or that you outgrew one another.

No further details.

Not yet anyways.

Well, that just about does it for this video, I hope you enjoyed it.

If you have any questions about what I've covered here then please post those in the

comments below, along with any other topics you think should be avoided early on in a

relationship.

As always thanks so much for watching and if you'd like to check out more of my dating

advice videos then just hit the subscribe button below.

Until next time take care and good luck!

No comments:

Post a Comment