Wink, J. (2011). Critical Pedagogy: Notes From the Real World, (Fourth Edition p.93-99)Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education.
-------------------------------------------
''Look at you, you are amazing!'' ((BONUS LEVEL-UP)) - Duration: 16:41.
That's beautiful
where are you from, Karina?
I'm Armenian, but not exactly from Armenia. I'm from the neighbor of Armenia- Georgia.
oh
you cut tags?
next time don't cut tags
because it looks like you used them
I'm just helping you
OK
all tags are cut?
((GEORGIAN)) Greetings
((GEORGISN)) Greetings
how do you know?
((GEORGIAN)) The Georgian language
how do you know?
I know a little bit of Georgian
from where?
hhahahahha
No, why do you know?
I study different languages
Ah, you study different languages
he speaks all
very nice
that's very interesting, very nice
usually, people don't like it
you give me a job, you see
you speak Georgian and Armenian. Do you speak any other languages?
I speak Russian very well
((RUSSIAN)) Hi!
LOOK AT YOU!
((RUSSIAN)) Do you speak Russian?
((RUSSIAN)) Yes, I speak
((RUSSIAN)) Of course!
look at you!
((RUSSIAN)) It's difficult to learn...
You have an accent, but you speak very well
OMG!
LOOK AT YOU!
((RUSSIAN)) Yes, yes..I like....
look at him..
((RUSSIAN)) I like to learn many languages
perfect, perfect
he said that he likes to learn different languages
can you believe it....
Look at this...what's going on with you now. He's good, but you're bad
LLOLOLOL!!!
look at thee pants...he worse these pants
look at them, they're wrinkled, too
what did you say to her?
((RUSSIAN)) Not bad
but I tell you that you're bad
hahahaha'
she's just kidding
it's OK
I will return this, but you can't wear stuff then return it.
you cannot do this
somebody tell you that you can?
no
You wore this, look at it
((RUSSIAN)) Sorry
he apologizes
for you
very good, you're good. Did you study somewhere?
((RUSSIAN)) I learned Russian in my home
((RUSSIAN)) I don't have a teacher now, but I had a good teacher a long time ago
((RUSSIAN)) In Russian
((RUSSIAN)) But he went back to Russian because his mom was sick
((RUSSIAN)) He wasn't a citizen
((RUSSIAN))Yes
((RUSSIAN)) Why?
((RUSSIAN)) I see
just for you I'm going to do it
lololol
((RUSSIAN)) Very interesting
he speaks very well
I mean, he has an accent, but very nice
very good, GOOD JOB!
how long did you, uh..
((RUSSIAN)) Two years
((RUSSIAN)) At home
((RUSSIAN)) I have a lot of books...
you impress me, I have to tell you, very nice
first time I see somebody like you
My husband is an American man and he knows nothing....
((RUSSIAN)) I love
((RUSSIAN)) For foreigners
((ARMENIAN)) Armenian
((ARMENIAN)) I can speak a little Armenian
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!
((ARMENIAN)) I can speak a little Armenian
((RUSSIAN)) Perhaps, perhaps...
((RUSSIAN)) My brother
((RUSSIAN)) Chinese
((RUSSIAN)) I speak Chinese
**LANGUAGE SPIDER SENSE IS TINGGLING!**
((KOREAN)) Are you Korean?
((KOREAN)) How are you?
((KOREAN)) I can speak Korean
((KOREAN)) Your Korean is good
((KOREAN)) You're being too nice
ahhahahaahhaha
((KOREAN)) Where..
((KOREAN)) From where did you learn?
((KOREAN)) I learned by myself
((KOREAN)) By yourself?
((KOREAN)) But lately I haven't really being studying it that much
((KOREAN)) How long have you learned for?
((KOREAN)) 2 years
((KOREAN)) 2 years?
((KOREAN)) Where in Korea are you from?
((KOREAN)) Is that in the south?
((KOREAN)) Nice to meet you
((KOREAN)) Have a good day
((KOREAN)) Have a good day
**LEARNING LANGUAGES IS A DAMN SUPERPOWER,MAN**
''I told you that I speak everything''
((RUSSIAN)) I know
((RUSSIAN)) I think that everybody should know 2 languages
((RUSSIAN)) Thank you very much!
((RUSSIAN)) Thank you!
((ARMENIAN))Thank you
((GEORGIAN)) Thank you
((RUSSIAN)) I'm a teacher
((RUSSIAN)) Fishing
((RUSSIAN)) Thank you
((RUSSIAN)) You're welcome
((RUSSIAN)) Nice to meet you
((RUSSIAN)) Likewise
hahahahahahaha
((RUSSIAN)) Pronunciation
((RUSSIAN)) Nice to meet you
((RUSSIAN)) See you later
((KOREAN)) Goodbye
((KOREAN)) Goodbye
-------------------------------------------
Use of One Versus Two Time Points for Calibration of Land Change Models - Duration: 10:27.
Controversy abounds within
the field of land change modeling
concerning the number if time points to
use when calibrating extrapolation models.
This video explains the difference
between using one time point
versus two time points for calibration.
This research is based on
Jessica McDermott's Masters thesis supervised
by Professor Pontius.
This video is presented by Sara
Brown and Carly Robbins.
We illustrate the principles with a case
study using the
Long Term Ecological Research Network's
Plum Island Ecosystems site
located in northeastern
Massachusetts.
We use the land change model
GEOMOD
to show the concepts.
GEOMOD is a module
in the TerrSet software available from
Clark Labs.
For more information on GEOMOD,
please see the other videos in the series.
A one time point calibration requires
a dependent variable at
one time point,
in this case built versus non-built at 2011,
as pictured on the left.
Built at 2011 is black,
and non-built at 2011 is gray.
We use one independent variable,
in this case surficial geology
to explain the transition
to non-built to built.
Geology is appropriate because
we suspect builders
consider geology
when deciding where to build,
and geology is consistent over long
temporal extents.
The map on the right shows four geology types. GEOMOD
calibrates a suitability value for each
geology type. The suitability
of a certain geology type
for the transition to built
is equal to the size of built
on a geology type divided
by the size of
that geology type. A two
time point calibration requires a
dependent variable of the change
between two time points,
in this case the gain of built versus
the persistence of non-built
from 2001 to 2011.
The map on the left displays
the gain of built in red and the persistence of non-built
in gray. Built at 2001 is
in black, and is eliminated from the analysis,
because built pixels at 2001
are not pixels that can
experience gain of built
during 2001 to 2011.
Again, GEOMOD calibrates a
suitability value for each
geology type.
For the two time point calibration method,
the suitability of a
certain geology type for transition
to built is equal to
the size of gain of built on
a geology type divided by the
size of that geology type that is not
built at 2011.
This equation differs from the
one time point calibration
because the two time point method
excludes the region that was already
built at 2011.
The figure on the left shows the suitability
values from the
one time point calibration approach.
This figure displays the percentage of each
geology type
that is covered with built
at 2011.
The black dotted line indicates that 42
percent of the spacial extent
is built at 2011.
The figure on the right shows
the gain of built from 2001 to
2011 as a percentage
of each geology type that was
non-built at 2011
and that experienced a gain of built
from 2001 to 2011.
The black dotted line indicates
that 5 percent of non-built
at 2011 transitioned
to built from 2001 to
2011.
The longest bar in each graph
shows the category that
is the most suitable for future change according to
each calibration method.
The one time point approach on the left
shows that gravel has
the highest built percentage.
The two time point approach on the right
shows that bedrock
has the highest built percentage.
GEOMOD uses these percentages
to create suitability maps,
which the next slide shows.
The figure on the left shows the
one time point calibration suitability map
where gravel has the highest
suitability for future gain of built.
The map on the right shows the
two time point calibration suitability map,
where bedrock has the highest suitability
for future gain of built.
Linear extrapolation of the gain of built
from 2001 to 2011
implies that the Plum Island Ecosystems
would transition from 42 percent
built at 2011
to 66 percent built
over a duration of 75 years.
GEOMOD allocates this quantity
of the gain of extrapolated built
at the non-built pixels that have the
largest suitability values.
We performed
two runs of GEOMOD:
one run using
the one time point suitability map
and a second run using
the two time point suitability map.
This map is an overlay of the two output maps
from the two GEOMOD runs.
Black is built at 2011. Gray is
non--built persistence using both calibration methods.
Yellow is gain of built using
the two time point calibration method.
Red is gain of built using
the one time point
calibration method.
There is no intersection between the
extrapolated gain of built using the
one time point method
and from the two time point method.
This demonstrates how
the method of calibration
can have a dramatic influence
on the extrapolation.
The one time point calibration method
is based on the state of the landscape
at a single time point,
which reflects the accumulation of
extremely long term trends.
The allocation of built
at a one time point reflects the decisions
concerning where humans have built from
a time prior
to human settlement.
In our study area, humans
have historically concentrated
built on gravel. The two time point calibration method
is based on
the change of the landscape
of the landscape between two time points
which reflects much shorter term
trends. In our study area,
humans have concentrated recent gains
of built on bedrock.
The number of time points
can make a difference in calibration
and extrapolation.
One time point can give a stronger calibration
because the implied temporal extent
is from the natural
non-built state to the one time point.
Two time points
can give a weaker signal for calibration
because the two time point method
focuses exclusively
on change between two recent time points.
The appropriate number of
time points depends on the purpose of the model
and the stationarity of the
change processes. If the
recent change processes are stationary
with the historical processes,
then we recommend you use the
one time point calibration method
because the one time point calibration
tends to use a
stronger empirical signal.
If the recent growth trends
are expected to continue and are
non-stationary with the historical processes,
then we recommend
the two time point calibration.
When in doubt, use both
methods to show how much difference it makes.
The National Science Foundation supported
this work via the Long Term Ecological Research Network's Plum Island Ecosystems
The Massachusetts Office
of Geographic Information and the
Land Cover Database supplied
the data.
Here is our contact information.
For more information on GEOMOD
and TerrSet, please visit
www.clarklabs.org.
Please see more
videos on Professor
Pontius' website,
and may all your modeling experiences
be insightful.
-------------------------------------------
( English Action Thriller Movies ) English Action Movies 2017 Full Movie | English Subtitle Movies - Duration: 2:00:50.
Subscribe Us
-------------------------------------------
Michael Moore Admits He Hates Trump So Much That He'd Rather Have North Korea Nuke Us To Death - Duration: 2:30.
Michael Moore Admits He Hates Trump So Much That He'd Rather Have North Korea Nuke Us
To Death
We all knew that Michael Moore hates President Trump.
But he just made it clear that he would rather have North Korea bomb us to death than live
in a country under Trump.
In an interview with MSNBC's Chris Hayes, Moore gave an answer so extreme that even
MSNBC's reporter were furious.
"When I read the news from North Korea there was another missile test that failed, we'll
be getting probably some official statements on that.
I find myself genuinely rooting for [Trump} to handle the Korean situation well, I mean
there's all sorts of areas where I am, you are rooting for the man to be competent and
effective," said Hayes.
Yes, even if you don't like President Trump, it should be common sense that you want him
to stop another country from launching missiles at us.
However, Michael Moore disagreed.
"I don't know if I agree with that," said Moore.
"You're not rooting him to deal with North Korea well?!"
Hayes screamed back.
"It's like rooting for a six-year-old who suddenly swiped his dad's car and figured
out how to take it down the road.
I'm not rooting for the six year old to get on the highway and drive that car!
I want the six year old off the highway, that's essentially what we got.
Just the implication of what you're saying means that he could possibly find a sane way
and a safe way to figure out how to deal with it," explained Moore.
"I would like to avoid nuclear war and I'm fervently hoping that the president of the
United States navigates us in a safe direction away from that," responded Hayes.
"Well, you got the wrong person," said Moore.
Wow.
Check out the video below.
-------------------------------------------
3 Conversation Topics That Ruin Relationships - Duration: 4:28.
Hey YouTube, my name is Amy North and today I want to talk about specific conversations
that ruin new relationships.
For those of you who don't know me I'm a relationship coach from the west coast of
Canada, and over the last few years I've been working with women around the world to
improve their love lives.
Today I want to take it from the top and talk about three topics that end relationships
before they even have the chance to blossom.
In other words, talks that kill your chances are going the distance with a new partner.
Now you may be asking yourself why it is that I'm stressing "new" relationships and
"early" days and that's because unlike couples who have been together for a while
and know one another well, certain topics can drive away your new love interest because
they haven't gotten the chance to know you well enough just yet.
You'll understand what I mean better in a moment.
Now before I jump into this I would like to quickly ask that if you enjoy what you learn
here today then please take a moment to subscribe to my YouTube channel.
There you will be able to check out more of my dating advice videos and I'd really appreciate
the support.
So please, keep that in mind while watching this video.
Alright, let's get started.
So the first conversation that can ruin a new relationship is one that goes something
like this.
You and your guy are chatting and he mentions a female he knows, be it a friend, colleague,
whoever.
But, instead of listening to his story you start asking yourself who this woman is, and
questions their relationship.
Has he hooked up with her?
Is he attracted to her?
The works.
Unfortunately this feeling of worrying comes on so strongly that you end up asking him
these questions.
The problem here is two-fold.
If he says yes then you are going to never want him to be around her, regardless of how
long ago their rendezvous happened.
If he says no, well, you're probably going to question it still, and may even convince
yourself that he's lying to avoid you getting jealous.
Not to mention how insecure you'll look, and how awkward that conversation may be.
So, really, this conversation is a lose lose and if it gets out of hand, well, I hate it
say it but you can kiss your relationship goodbye.
Instead of letting these thoughts get the best of you realize that what is in the past
is in the past.
It can't be changed or undone, so don't let it ruin what you have presently.
The second kind of conversation to avoid early in a relationship is the one about wanting
kids.
Sure, there is an innocent way to go about this, but telling the guy you're seeing
that you want to have children by a certain age or deadline can be a dead breaker… not
to mention the pressure it puts on him if that end date is near!
Instead of telling him your big picture plans, if the topic comes up simply say, "Yeah,
that's something I can see myself wanting down the road" or "It's a possibility."
Really you don't have to tell him yes or no at all right now, instead keep it vague
and roll with it.
The point is to avoid seeming baby crazy.
Why?
Because it could send him running, or even make him question how far you're willing
to go to make that dream happen.
At the same time, if he brings it up and shares all this thoughts and plans regarding children
then feel free to get on board and tell him honestly you're feeling towards having kids.
That said, just be sure not to say anything that is going to make him feel uncomfortable.
The same rule can be applied when discussing marriage early on in the relationship.
Alright now my third and final conversation to avoid in the beginning of your relationship
is the dreaded "my ex" conversation.
While it may seem easier to talk about your dating history earlier on in the relationship
— before you become too emotionally involved with one another — talking about your ex
at the start of a new relationship is rarely a good thing.
Again, there's a lose-lose here.
For instance, you either speak of your ex in a high regard and your new man will think
that you're not over your ex, OR you bash them, say how much of a loser he was and blame
him for your demise and he again, thinks you're not over him, or he worries that you'll
speak poorly of him down the road, too.
To avoid this from happening don't bring up exes.
If for some reason they do come up keep your comments short and sweet.
Don't make it seem like your past relationships were a huge deal, and when possible, change
the subject.
If your new man does ask you what happened with your last relationship, or why it didn't
last, simply say that you wanted different things or that you outgrew one another.
No further details.
Not yet anyways.
Well, that just about does it for this video, I hope you enjoyed it.
If you have any questions about what I've covered here then please post those in the
comments below, along with any other topics you think should be avoided early on in a
relationship.
As always thanks so much for watching and if you'd like to check out more of my dating
advice videos then just hit the subscribe button below.
Until next time take care and good luck!
No comments:
Post a Comment