An Giang info: Youtube daily report Aug 30 2018

- I want to welcome everyone to the DIY Entrepreneur Channel

and on this episode I'm going to be showing you

how to make at least $100 a day online

even if you have no experience or you're broke

and don't have any money in the bank account.

Don't worry, by the time this video is done

you're going to have at least two tactics

that you can go out and get started today

to start putting money in that bank account.

(object thuds) (fire wooshes)

My name is Joe Marfoglio; I've been online since 2008

and I've helped thousands of people

make money online, and quit their day job,

and some of those people have even gone on

to make millions of dollars.

So the first tactic we're going to be talking about

is affiliate marketing.

So what is affiliate marketing?

It's real simple, it is when someone puts out a product

and you run traffic to that product,

they give you a commission for selling it.

The beauty of affiliate marketing is,

you can go out and find someone

who's already created a product on,

say, working out or weight loss;

you take your skill that you know,

you create videos, you run traffic to that product,

and they give you a commission, usually it's like 50%.

I've done it; I've been doing it since,

this part of the business I've been doing since 2012.

And you know what, let's just do this.

Here we are at my computer screen

and up on my screen here I have a site called ClickBank.

Now what is ClickBank?

This is where people who have created info products

post their products, so it's a marketplace

that you can go to, and this is set up, actually, to pair

affiliates, the people that want to promote a product,

with product creators, the people who have those products.

So what you do is you just go through here.

There's thousands of niches in here, not only products.

And you find something that you're interested in.

And what happens is ClickBank gives you a link

that you can use, that's your affiliate link.

And then when you make the sale,

ClickBank automatically tracks the sale

and then ClickBank pays you.

So not only is it matching you up with product creators,

you don't even have to talk to that product creator,

and it's not like, you know, you sell the product

and you hope the guy sends you a check,

you will create the product.

No, ClickBank takes care of it all.

Now, let me show you what they call the Marketplace, right?

The Marketplace, this is where you find

all kinds of products.

The beauty of this is like, say you're in

the weight loss niche, right?

You like weight loss and they have thousands

of weight loss products.

You find the product you like,

like here's one, the 3 Week Diet.

It's saying that affiliates are making $52,000 a day;

that means they're paying out $52,000 a day

in affiliate commissions, which is huge.

Now in a second I'm going to get into

how to run traffic to these offers,

but first I want to show you everything you get.

So first of all, if you click on this right here,

it'll take you to the sales page.

Not only do you get this landing page but look at this.

They have an affiliate section.

Now what do they do in this affiliate section?

They help you promote their product;

they give you all kinds of stuff,

free giveaways, coupon codes; they show you the upsell.

They give you banners that you could use on your site,

in your promotions; they give you graphics.

They give you videos that you can use;

you can use all these videos in your promotions;

they give you email swipes.

So if you want to send out an email follow-up system,

they give you all the emails to send;

you don't even have to write it.

Press releases, content, quizzes;

they give you everything you need to promote this product.

And guess what, they've been doing this for years

so they know what works, what doesn't work;

what converts, what doesn't convert.

So if you start promoting this 3-Week Diet,

you're like way ahead of the game.

Now how do you promote it, right?

Like say okay, what do I do, like how do I promote it?

It's simple, right?

One of the easiest ways to get traffic

or to get eyes on a product is

through video and through YouTube.

I want to show you guys something.

Here's a few videos that I've made.

I made these videos years ago;

this one I made back in 2013.

If you look at this video, this was for

another weight loss product, it was called Venus Factor.

This video has 85,000 views; it's about a minute 22 seconds.

If you play this video, it's not my voice,

it's a woman's voice.

And it's basically a whiteboard animation video.

This entire video cost me about,

I don't know, maybe about 50, 60 bucks to make,

and I ranked it on YouTube,

and through this Venus Factor product,

I probably made, I don't know, $60-70,000?

Just sending traffic to this Venus Factor product,

which was a product that was similar to this 3-Week Diet.

All you have to do is find a niche, or find a topic,

or something that there's a lot of search volume in, right?

And then you match it with a product.

If you know something about the niche,

or the topic, all the better.

And then you create a video.

This video cost me, like I said, 50 bucks.

I had it done on a site called Fiverr;

I had a voiceover done.

What I like to do is when I'm looking in these niches

and I'm looking at these products,

I want to find something that is urgent,

or that people want a solution to right now.

If you suffer from anxiety and panic attack

and you're looking at how to help with panic attacks,

you're going to want a solution right now, right?

Right now.

And if you provide a compelling enough video,

and you build up trust, they're going

to take you up on that solution.

Now let's get on to tactic number two.

In all the years that I've been

training and mentoring people,

the people that have done this tactic

have had not only the most success,

they've had the fastest success.

They've ramped up to six figures a year

within a couple months doing this one thing.

Now what is this?

This is starting your own local marketing,

or digital marketing or social media marketing agency.

Now you might be thinking, whoa whoa whoa;

you know, I'm not a marketer, this seems like a lot of work.

Guys, it's not that much work at all.

And I'm going to actually show you how huge this market is

and how easy it is for you to get into it.

So let's go over to my computer screen right now.

So this one is going out, finding

local businesses in your area,

and helping them with their SEO

or more, helping them with their video SEO

or put videos together and ranking them

on YouTube and Google.

This article right here, this is in Search Engine Land

and the forecast says that "SEO-related spending

"will be worth $80 billion by 2020."

And if you don't know what SEO is,

that's search engine optimization.

That's optimizing people's websites, videos online

so that they can be seen on YouTube and Google.

And every local business needs this

but not a lot of them are doing it

so the ones that are doing it are grabbing

just a ton of traffic off Google and YouTube.

And one of the best ways to convert is with video.

And a lot of companies don't have videos

but you can make a video for a local company,

a professional-looking video, a green-screen video, for $50.

And then what you do is once you make the video

for these local businesses, you can go out

and you can put it on your YouTube channel

and you can start to rank them in their local markets.

And the great thing about ranking local videos

is that it's very easy to do, right?

Because the competition is very low, and someone searching

for a local business, so let's say this one,

Roofing Repair in Rockville, Maryland,

and then if you're looking for a roofing repair contractor,

the first thing you do is you see this video, right?

And they hit it, they can play it,

and it's a nice, professional video.

Let's look at a different one here,

mold inspection, Escondido, California.

So again, when you're looking for mold inspection,

this is another video I have; that's mine.

But if we look at it, look how it stands out.

So it's almost like a little picture ad

and it stands out from everything else around it.

Let's look at another one, flat roofing repair.

Again, so you see, when you're searching these terms,

and you could rank a video on the first page of Google,

it's huge for local businesses

and they'll pay you a lot of money to do that.

All right, well I hope you enjoyed those two tactics

that I just got done showing you.

Those are things that you can really implement right now

and start making money right away.

Now, if you want more information

on anything that I just showed you,

just go right over here to my site;

my members' area, it's totally free.

I have blueprints, PDFs, everything you need

to get started right now.

Also, if you like videos on how to make money online,

make sure you subscribe to the channel.

We put out videos every week and we do live streams;

See you on the next video.

For more infomation >> How To Make Money Online in 2018 as a Broke Beginner - Duration: 9:33.

-------------------------------------------

Top 2 cache cache serveur privé / Battle Royale de LeFouBruiteur. Avec Jurajuma. :) - Duration: 16:00.

For more infomation >> Top 2 cache cache serveur privé / Battle Royale de LeFouBruiteur. Avec Jurajuma. :) - Duration: 16:00.

-------------------------------------------

If Trump remains a bully, John McCain's funeral won't be the last he isn't invited to - Duration: 3:17.

For more infomation >> If Trump remains a bully, John McCain's funeral won't be the last he isn't invited to - Duration: 3:17.

-------------------------------------------

KAMOU SAVAGE " A La Francaise" ( Clip Officiel ) - Duration: 2:07.

For more infomation >> KAMOU SAVAGE " A La Francaise" ( Clip Officiel ) - Duration: 2:07.

-------------------------------------------

Liverpool Champions League group: Jurgen Klopp reacts to difficult draw - Duration: 4:38.

The Reds were drawn alongside PSG, Napoli and Red Star Belgrade in Group C for the six-game group stage of this year's tournament

Speaking about the draw, Klopp said: "To be 100 per cent honest, it was not that I had a group I wished for or whatever

"I expected a difficult group, we have a difficult group and that's what the Champions League is all about

"With the quality of the tournament, it was always likely we'd get a really tough draw on paper

" Breaking each team down individually, he said: "PSG are one of the most exciting teams in the world and I think their target is to win the Champions League, so that will be two interesting matches

"Napoli, we beat them in pre-season but it goes without saying these two games will be completely a different challenge

"I've been to Napoli with Dortmund, so I know what the atmosphere is like there. In fact, it's where I got a suspension [for being sent off]

I can do better, obviously! "Red Star, I watched them last night. They came through and it will be, again, a very, very intense atmosphere I am sure

" But Klopp insisted he doesn't mind being drawn alongside some of the best teams in the world, and that his side are ready to take them on

"The Champions League is the biggest club competition in the world, so it should be difficult because it is

We cannot expect to get an 'easy' group or whatever," he said. "It's important and interesting to watch the draw, but in the end you have absolutely no influence on it

Now we can start having influence because now we can prepare for the games and look at their games

"I am looking forward to watching PSG a bit more often, which is a very interesting project for sure over in France with Thomas Tuchel

Champions League draw: Why are Liverpool in Pot 3? Who will they face? Champions League draw fixtures: When are the next League games? Carabao Cup draw LIVE: Man Utd, Chelsea, Arsenal, Liverpool fixtures "Facing Neymar will be, for our Brazilian guys, like meeting a friend again and all that stuff

It's a big challenge, but for all the others it is a big challenge to face us." And Klopp is confident following last year's run to the final, that other teams will be fearing coming up against his men

"For sure, when you have already a group with Paris Saint-Germain and Napoli – two absolutely top teams – then you don't want to have Liverpool as the third team!" he said

"'It is how it is' is the best way to describe it; don't think too much about it

If you think about the group, you are already out. If you think it is too difficult, you are already out

"We don't think either. We will play the games, we will be competitive – that's what we have to make sure – and that is all

" He added: "Last season is last season and now we have to do it again. That's normal

All the teams have to do it again. We want to go through the group. "It will be difficult but still we want to go through

That's the plan, so now let's start working on it." Liverpool's first game will take place on the 18 or 19 September, with further games held on October 2/3, October 23/24, November 6/7, November 27/28 and December 11/12

For more infomation >> Liverpool Champions League group: Jurgen Klopp reacts to difficult draw - Duration: 4:38.

-------------------------------------------

New Fingerlings Dragons

For more infomation >> New Fingerlings Dragons

-------------------------------------------

Honda Jazz 1.4 S - Duration: 1:03.

For more infomation >> Honda Jazz 1.4 S - Duration: 1:03.

-------------------------------------------

Ford Fiesta 1.0 80PK 5D S/S Style Airco / Nav - Duration: 0:53.

For more infomation >> Ford Fiesta 1.0 80PK 5D S/S Style Airco / Nav - Duration: 0:53.

-------------------------------------------

Ford Fiesta 1.0 65PK 5D S/S Style Airco / Navi - Duration: 1:11.

For more infomation >> Ford Fiesta 1.0 65PK 5D S/S Style Airco / Navi - Duration: 1:11.

-------------------------------------------

Toronto's Yorkdale mall evacuated after gunshots ring out - Duration: 2:06.

For more infomation >> Toronto's Yorkdale mall evacuated after gunshots ring out - Duration: 2:06.

-------------------------------------------

Evangelio De Hoy Jueves 30 De Agosto De 2018 (Mateo 24, 42-51) - Duration: 1:14.

For more infomation >> Evangelio De Hoy Jueves 30 De Agosto De 2018 (Mateo 24, 42-51) - Duration: 1:14.

-------------------------------------------

Far from Home: Bringing Archaeological Collections & Tribal Ancestors Home to Alaska - Duration: 52:23.

Good afternoon. My name is Diana Warring and I'm the Director of the Interior

Museum, and it is my pleasure to welcome you here today for our lunchtime lecture

series. Each month we focus on one of our various bureaus or our partners or the

ways that our bureaus interconnect on a various number of themes throughout

America and abroad. Emily Palus is joining us today, she has

coordinated management of federal museum collections and compliance with the

Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act, or NAGPRA, for nearly 20

years with the Bureau of Land Management, the Bureau of Indian Affairs, and the

Interior Department former colleague here at the Interior Museum.

She has spearheaded initiatives as well as guided others to partner and

negotiate with museums and universities holding federal collections to develop

innovative solutions for preservation needs, access and use for research, and

education coordination with descendant and resource communities and

repatriation. Please join me in welcoming Emily Palus.

Good afternoon everyone. I'm just delighted to be here with you today and

pleased to return to the Interior Museum, where I started my career with the

department as an intern in 1999. So any interns out there, or especially National

Council for Preservation Education interns - that's where I got my start, so

I'm pleased to be back. Many thanks to Diana for this invitation

to participate in the monthly lecture series. The title of my talk is Far From

Home: Bringing Archaeological Collections and

Ancestors Home to Alaska. We'll focus on a recent interagency effort to retrieve

a sizeable collection of Native Alaskan ancestral remains, or human remains, and

artifacts collected 70 to 110 years ago from public lands in Alaska. The

collections were curated in a prominent East Coast institution, but we

took the effort to move the collection and return to Alaska, placing it in

another reputable institution. Some of the

collections will remain there and some will be repatriated to descendant

communities. My role in this project is not one of being an expert in Alaskan

archaeology. My role is much more that of perhaps expediter or facilitator

in this process. This case study provides a valuable and perhaps lesser-known view

into some of the Department of Interior's work and responsibilities to

the American public regarding care of museum collections, artifacts, specimens

recovered from the public lands, and the associated records. It also highlights

responsibilities for upholding the rights of Native American - the rights of

descendant communities to Native American human remains, and certain

categories of cultural property. And it also shows a thoughtful consideration of

the wishes of local and regional communities to retain a connection to

the antiquities or the archaeological resources associated with their home as

a source of identity, pride, and in some cases, heritage tourism and economic

opportunity. So as I narrate this story I'll aim to weave in some of these

broader concepts and frankly address some uncomfortable histories, which

provide context for this story, and illustrate current responses to some of the

history of archaeology, certainly changing museum practices, the role of

the federal government in upholding a public trust for the care of collections,

and particular responsibilities to Indian tribes, Native Alaskan villages,

and corporations. So over the last century, researchers from across the US

and Europe explored Native villages and archaeological sites across Alaska,

collecting human remains and artifacts from the public lands. This case is but

one, and I want to caution that some of the images I'm going to share are going

to include exposed burials of human remains and skeletal remains. So let's

begin. In July of 2017, so just not quite a year ago, a team representing the

Bureau of Land Management, the US Fish and Wildlife Service, the National Park

Service, along with representatives from the University of Alaska Fairbanks

Museum of the North, retrieved 38 individuals, 13 sets of Native American

human remains, and 1,592 artifacts from the Peabody Museum of Archaeology and

Ethnology at Harvard University in Cambridge, Massachusetts.

These ancestors and collections originated from Alaska and there are

three circles that plain you can see. The green circle through the top the world,

Twin Islands and Jones Island, we'll talk about that expedition. St. Lawrence

Island, subject to two of the expeditions, and the Aleutians focusing on that

island. So let's learn part of their story beginning not when they lived, but

after they were buried, and when they were found by explorers and researchers

and made into museum collections. The first collection was made 110 years ago

with Anglo-American Polar Expedition, which intended to look for undiscovered

lands in the Arctic aboard the Duchess of Bedford, a schooner with no engines. So

powered only by wind. The expedition was led by a Danish naval adventurer,

and American geologist. You can imagine that these types of expeditions required

a lot of coordination, and a lot of resources - they needed sponsors. Apparently

to satisfy one of the funders, the expedition added an ethnographic

component. So Mr. Stefansson, who was an anthropologist associated with Harvard

University, was hired to study the natives encounter during the expedition,

and acquire artifacts for the Peabody and Royal Ontario Museums.

So I want to give you a sense that this is really on top of the world, where these

guys are in their wind powered schooner. The Duchess of Bedford became locked in

ice and ultimately destroyed, and a camp was set on Flaxman Island, here, using the

remains of the ship to build a cabin in the area now just north of the Arctic

National Wildlife Refuge in the Beaufort Sea. And this location actually is on the

National Register of Historic Places, principally associated with the

geologist Leffingwell, who used this as his campsite made out of the former

schooner, for several seasons. Stefansson the anthropologist ultimately left the

expedition and lived with the Inuit of the Mackenzie Delta in Canada over 1907,

1908, over the winter. And following that experience, the Arctic remained the

focus of his research and studies for his career. For instance, between 1906 and

1918, Stefansson undertook three long expeditions, living with and among the

Native villages in Alaska and Canada, adopting the native way of life, which he

chronicled in his book, for instance, his 1922 book "My Life with the Eskimo."

Stefansson pioneered research into Arctic living and methods for enduring

or really thriving in this harsh environment. This included a low

carbohydrate diet, focused on meat and fish, so perhaps he was a forefather to

Atkins. While I joke and perhaps take some

liberties here, but a point is that this is the first expedition that brought this

young researcher to the Arctic and it would be the focal point of his career.

But I digress, this story is about the human remains and artifacts that he

collected. I mentioned that Stefansson was tasked with making excavations and

collecting for the Peabody and Royal Ontario Museums, and he did. 221 items were

deposited at Harvard University's Peabody Museum, according to their

records, including human bones, fishing and hunting equipment, pipes, weapons and

tools, ceremonial objects, jewelry, and bone ornaments. And he took fairly

detailed notes, and they're in narrative form and give a sense of the excavation

and camp life. For instance, he wrote on June 11th, 1906 on Flaxman Island,

"Skeleton and ravine bank, southeast part of island near native houses. Apparently

body had been deposited in ordinary blog grave. Later erosion and lateral

development of river had caused bank to crumble, and bones of wood had tumbled

about and mixed. Only small part frontal bone showed above turf. From buried

position and absences of regular

parallel logs, the native Saxawanna told us that he inferred the man to have

been murdered and hidden, but the geologic explanation seems more

reasonable to me." On Jones Island he later wrote on July 22nd that same year,

1906, "last evening I commenced digging in a trench along the seaboard wall at

the kashim," or house, "but found the drift of sand so deep that I thought

it hopeless with one spade and shortness of grub to try it.

You see our food supply will surely not allow us to stay more than three

days, and the boys are already fearing possible starvation. I must give up

digging for the present, for the inlet waves to take off the sod and wait for

the Sun to do its work" - meaning melt. "The following objects were found:

flint chipper; mallet of antler found in wall on broad level, detaching pieces

from spear slightly in grave, found in wall, ground level; matlack blade of whale's

rib" and he goes on. As I mentioned, 221 artifacts were accessioned by the

Peabody Museum from this expedition, from various locales. And this included ten

sets of human remains and 41 objects - 41 artifacts - twelve clearly from graves,

based on his descriptions, from Flaxman, Jones, and Twin Islands. These were

federal lands. The Antiquities Act of 1906 had passed that same summer, and

required any gatherings of relics and examinations of ruins to be conducted

with a permit. But although this expedition didn't have a permit, the

federal hook was established. Materials from federal land needed to be deposited

in a public museum in perpetuity. Now I'm going to come back to the Antiquities Act, but

let's move on to our next expedition. A few years after the American Polar

Expedition, Harvard University's Museum of Comparative Biology participated in

an expedition in 1913 throughout Alaska in the Bering Sea. Aboard a little schooner named the

Polar Bear, a party of private big-game hunters and scientists from Harvard, the

Smithsonian, and the University of California set off to make an exhaustive

study of animal and bird life. During their year-and-a-half journey, the crew

visited the Aleutian Islands, Point Hope, Atka, Russia, Herschel Island, Chukchi

Peninsula known Indian points that vary at Point Barrow. And throughout their voyage,

the crew killed and recovered countless numbers of arctic birds,

walruses, mountain sheep, and whales. Facing a similar fate as the Duchess of

Bedford, the Polar Bear was also trapped in ice, but she was not destroyed. Four

crew members actually went over land, and the remaining crew camped on the edge of

the world, waiting eight months for the ice to melt the following spring. And

I traced this, I think, to actually a similar location as to where the other boat

froze, which was over here, so we're still up at the top of the world.

No one perished, which is amazing to me, however one of the crew later wrote

a book about his experience, and it was called Icy Hell.

It sells on Amazon for over $600. I should mention that this expedition was

heavily recorded by - there were a lot of photographers on this expedition.

So there's a fair number of photos, some available online, others in archives. But

as you can see it was principally focused on natural history and big-game hunting,

but along the way the ship encountered natives who traded, educated, and helped

them, and a number of them joined the crew. One of the passengers, Bernard

Kilian, noted in his journal one particular couple who he was quite fond

of, Mr. and Mrs. Itloon. And they stayed with him for a week, and sharing their

stories from their culture, and imparted knowledge about their way of life.

Bernard wrote that his stay with Itloon and his wife was one of the

highlights of his trip, and he enjoyed every minute of it.

So this expedition was principally a natural history tour for research and hunting

and then there is this ethnographic, cultural, early cultural tourism approach,

but the group also conducted some excavations - why not? - collected some human

remains. We know that during the expedition at least 11 skulls, human

skulls, were collected and then subsequently donated

to the Museum of Comparative Zoology at Harvard University, who then turned and

donated them to the Peabody Museum, its sister

organization. A few years later another skull from the same expedition was

donated, so somehow it didn't make the first transaction. We know this from

the museum records maintained by the institution. Seven of those skulls

were from St. Lawrence Island, which was federal land administered by the

General Land Office at the time, predecessor to the Bureau of

Land Management. And here I'm showing you some specimen tags and a portion of

the accession ledger. And on the map, I'm showing you one where they

took the knife this is in blue, this is St. Lawrence Island.

You can also actually see that the accession ledger has lots of information.

"Skull with mandible," "St. Lawrence Island, Bering Sea."

So over the next 30 years, expeditions still undertaken to the Arctic for

research on both the indigenous population and archaeological remains.

Researchers such as Ales Hrdlicka, Otto Geist, Ted Bank led teams, raised

students, made collections. One of Hrdlicka's students was William Laughlin,

who made his first trip to Alaska in 1938, and he returned in 1948 a PhD

candidate at Harvard. Laughlin directed the expedition to the

Aleutian Islands to study and report on the history, culture, language, physical

condition, and origins of the Aleutian people. The expedition was funded by

Harvard, the Viking Fund, and a contract through the Navy Research Group, which

the latter of which focused on biomedical research of the native

population. To quote from the expedition proposal and description, "the object of

the research is to look for physical and cultural adaptations made in answer to

the demands of their particular environment. Living

population and the physical and cultural remains of their forebearers and

archaeological sites will be studied. The headquarters of the expedition will be

at the village of Nikolski on Umnak Island, where tests at the prehistoric

population of the village indicate a continuous occupation from the time

of the original settlement of the islands, the living population of

skeletons from the prehistoric periods at Nikolski, and at other sites will

provide a complete record of the history of mankind on these islands."

So Laughlin studied in the population of Nikolski on Umnak Island and also

excavated their old village site which included the Chaluka Mound, an area of

occupation for almost 4,000 years. One of Laughlin's students later described the

expedition, "they excavated by day, took measurements and blood and recorded ethnography

at night." And I want to read an excerpt from a journal from

one of the expedition team members, a man name by Alan May, who, if I can say I almost

find charming. His journals are really a wonderful record of their

life, their expedition, and quite informative on their day to day,

and their research interests and, frankly, some of their interpersonal conflicts.

"Third Tuesday, June 29th, 1948. A light rain this morning but out to work anyway,

much against Shay's wishes," Shay was another archaeologist on the

expedition. "Left the skeleton I exposed

yesterday in the hopes that perhaps it might dry out a bit.

We have now acquired a ladder which is most useful. The ladder is quite useful

going from one level to another and much safer than climbing up

sides each time. Soon after starting work, I found a baby skeleton but the skull

was smashed. Another ivory labret turned up, bone points, fish, herbs, awls, flakers,

and reams, pins, adzes, scrapers, grindstones, and wedges were also found.

By noon we were pretty dirty and wet, so we spent the afternoon indoors. I cleaned

and segregated and Shay did at last started cataloging. This

was really piling up on us and I was glad to get started. Tonight everyone

went to church after supper to take photos. By that point going

to church with the villagers of Nikolski.

As I have some, I did not go but stayed here and cleaned up some specimens and bones.

Information from the natives is being slowly acquired. Vegetation that is

used as medicine, for food, myths and so on. There is one about an old stump

which is said to be under a little building near the church. When this stump,

or post according to some, grows tall enough to knock the ball off the top of

the building then the whole life of the natives will be completely changed or

the world will come to an end. There seems to be a chance that their life may

be changed shortly, for there is rumor that the Army may take over the entire

island. If the ball should happen to fall at the time they were evacuated, then of

course their superstitious believe would be much enhanced. We learn also

that there is a ghost here, something called the 'outside man.' It seems that

many believe in it and some will not go in the dark, but none of them scoff

at it." The next day, June 30th, Wednesday. "It was

raining hard this morning so we could not go to work. Worked on records, made

maps of the site, and so on. After lunch the rain was not so heavy, so we went out.

A piece of pottery, or something that looked very much like it turned up.

A skeleton of a youth, about 10 years old, was uncovered in the late afternoon, his

head under a rock. This was somewhat of an unusual burial in that the

body was extended and on his back. The first of this type of burial I have seen

here - normally they are flexed." And it goes on, he journaled every day.

One of my interests in the journals and the archival records is being able to

tie that information ultimately to the individuals and the artifacts we

ultimately recovered, and will be doing documentation on. But let's stick with

Laughlin, in 1949 he completed his dissertation with this research from the

'48 expedition. And last summer while I was in Cambridge I had the opportunity

to review his work. And I'll confess it was a bit of a personal experience

for me because for many, many years I had been trying to get information about

this collection, and I thought if I find the dissertation then surely that

will tell me all about this collection. And so I opened it up, and the spine

creaked, and the archivist said "I think you might be the first person to look at

this." To which my heart sank. And then I opened it up

and I started flipping through, and I realized that 90% of his dissertation

is on the biomedical research that he did on the then-current population, and about

10% is a comparative to 11 skulls. He collected more than that. There was

nothing on the material culture. So it was kind of this shocking moment okay,

okay, you need to find more than that, how else are we going to find out about

these artifacts? Will we find field notes? And we have found some – May's

journal I actually found last month. So it's coming together. But anyhow, so

there were no reference to the artifacts, although these would later be studied by

students, and Laughlin moved on to have a prominent career in physical anthropology,

moving to the University of Oregon, University of Wisconsin, the

University of Connecticut, and ultimately retiring in 1999, and he has since passed

away. His primary field of specialization was physical anthropology including the

Aleutians and Siberian studies, human biology, population history, and human evolution.

And over the years he made over 20 trips to Alaska, to the Aleutians, to study its

peoples, to dig, to collect. His research there culminated in the publication of a

1980 book, "Aleuts: Survivors of the Bering Land Bridge." We have so far found

collections made by Laughlin in eight institutions so far, and counting. But

from this particular trip he deposited 1,655 items to the Peabody Museum, we know

from their records, including human remains and artifacts, bone points, harpoons,

stone scrapers - all of the archaeological material he recovered on his trip from

federal lands administered either by the Bureau of Land Management or by the US

Fish and Wildlife Service. So last July we, being BLM and Fish and Wildlife,

retrieved 21 sets of remains and 1,542, and so if you're tracking all of my

numbers, that's not everything. But that's what the museum had. So as I've talked

about these collections in these three expeditions I paused and always noted

that there is a connection to federal lands - General Land Office, Bureau of Land

Management, US Fish and Wildlife Service. So what? Why does land status matter?

Why would the BLM and the US Fish and

Wildlife Service all these years later have a current interest in these

collections? What is the federal interest? What's the

federal role? What is the federal responsibility to the American public?

To local communities, researchers, Indian tribes, Native Alaskan villages

and corporations, Native Hawaiian organizations. This interest, the

roles and responsibilities are defined in a suite of laws enacted by Congress

with varying regulations, further implementing this direction which

fundamentally outline a philosophy and a set of values: that

archaeological resources are significant, important to all Americans, and that

descendant communities may have particular rights and interests. So let

me just give you a quick overview of these authorities and direction to put

current Department of Interior bureau activity

into context. So there's a long history of federal protections for antiquities

going back to 1906, with an act for the preservation of American antiquities,

signed by President Theodore Roosevelt. This was a visionary act to safeguard

archaeological and historic properties on federal lands from haphazard digging and

looting. While the Antiquities Act is most often referenced in current media

today regarding presidential establishment of monuments, in the

context of collections and management of archaeological sites, this Act

established that archaeological sites are most valuable for the information they

contain or their commemorative associations, not as commercial resources

like timber or minerals, that have primarily a monetary value. The

Antiquities Act declared the first federal policy that the management of

archaeological sites was in the public interest, asserting that permits for the

examination of ruins, the excavation of archaeological sites, the gathering of

objects of antiquity, may be granted to institutions deemed qualified. That the

examinations, excavations, and gatherings are undertaken for the benefit of

reputable museums, universities, colleges, and other scientific or educational

institutions, with a view towards increasing the knowledge of such

objects and gatherings made for permanent preservation in public museums,

public interest in these materials. This act established the

United States government responsibility to manage cultural resources and initiated

regulation of the investigation of those resources. So flash forward to the

National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, sets out a very broad federal historic

preservation policy and among many value statements,

purpose statements, the Congress finds and declares that the spirited direction

of the nation are founded upon and reflected in its historic heritage. And the

cultural and historic foundations of the nation should be preserved as a living

part of our community life and development in order to give a sense of

orientation to the American people that historic properties

significant to the nation's heritage are being lost or substantially altered,

often inadvertently, with increasing frequency and that the preservation of

this irreplaceable heritage is in the public interest. So

that in spite a legacy of cultural, educational, aesthetic, inspirational,

economic, and energy benefits can be maintained and enriched

for future generations of Americans. So among the many sections of the

National Historic Preservation Act, one section directs the creation of

regulations for the management of archaeological or art collections associated

with historic properties. I'll come back to that in a moment, the curation

regulations. But let me cover the successor to the Antiquities Act, if

you will. So 73 years after the Antiquities Act was enacted, in 1906,

have proved to be insufficient to protect archaeological sites that were

increasingly threatened and damaged by unauthorized excavation and pillage. So

Congress enacted ARPA, Archaeological Resources Protection Act, in 1979 to

further solidify federal policy that archaeological resources on public and Indian

lands are an accessible and irreplaceable part of the nation's heritage, and they are

increasingly endangered. ARPA was enacted to secure for the present and

future benefit of the American people the protection of these resources and

sites on public and Indian lands. This statute builds on the Antiquities Act

with more refined provisions regarding permitting investigations, and retains

the requirement that collections be deposited in a public museum for the long

term or in perpetuity. So not a statute, but I referenced that

NHPA gave direction for promulgation of regulations, as did ARPA for management

of archaeological collections. So Curation of Federally Owned and

Administered Archaeological Collections, those regulations were made final or

promulgated in 1990 and they established definition, standards, procedures, and

guidelines to be followed by federal agencies to preserve collections of

prehistoric and historic material remains and associated records. Covered

under the authority of the Antiquities Act, Reservoir Salvage Act, which I didn't

mention, National Historic Preservation Act and Archaeological Resources Protection

Act, the federal agency official is responsible for the long-term management

and preservation of pre-existing and new collections. Such collections shall be

placed in a repository – museum, university, institution - with adequate

long-term curatorial capabilities and so on.

Why? Why do we need these regulations governing collections?

Well federal property should be cared for to particular standards, and outline

the values and interests of the public in these collections, these

artifacts, laid out in the Antiquities Act, the National Historic Preservation Act,

and the Archaeological Resources Protection Act, that they needed to

be preserved and maintained to particular standards for the long term

or in perpetuity, and made available for research, exhibition, and

other appropriate uses. So, so far I've talked about public interest and benefit,

but there are classes of objects so important to American Indians that

Congress passed another law to assure Native American's right to them, in the

Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act enacted in 1990. NAGPRA

protects ancestral remains or NAGPRA addresses Native American human

remains and funerary objects, as well as sacred objects and objects of cultural

patrimony. The statute upholds the rights of Indian tribes, Native Alaskan villages

and corporations, and Native Hawaiian organizations the right to control the

disposition of their ancestors and certain categories of cultural property.

The law requires federal agencies and museums receiving federal funds to

document and inventory their collections, consult with Indian tribes, Native

Alaskan villages, and Native Hawaiian organizations, determine descendant or

who has rights or cultural affiliation, and upon a valid claim, repatriate. This

law established a responsibility for federal agencies and museums to act,

to inventory their collections and consult. So this responsibility for

conducting this work is based on a concept of control, and for federal

agencies this can tie to land. So control rests with the agency that managed the

land at the time the collection was made. Given the sensitive nature of these

materials and deadlines this work has been met with a sense of urgency. But

before I return to our case study, let me share a few challenges land

management agencies face in meeting these responsibilities for collections

care and its appropriate documentation, consultation, and repatriation. Under both the

Antiquities Act and the Archaeological Resources Protection Act permitting

standards, a museum had to be identified in the permit application, and that would

receive the collection, and a catalogue of what was collected be included in the

final report. There is nothing that required further follow-up by the

agencies, and in fact it wasn't until 1984 that most Interior bureaus had

authority to issue their own permits. Prior to that, the Office of the Secretary

issued permits, from 1906 to 1968, and the National Park Service Departmental

Consulting Archaeologist on behalf of the bureaus did serve until 1984.

Between 1906 and 1986, more than 3,000 permits were issued. So in 1990,

Curation and Regulations are issued, Native American Graves Protection and

Repatriation Act is enacted, and most agencies did not have readily available

information about the location, scope, and content of collections, basically relying

on museums housing them. So most successful NAGPRA compliance projects

were achieved through collaboration and a little bit of funding between the museum

holding the collection and the federal agency from

which lands the items were removed. So with that background, let's return to

our Alaska collections and providing for the appropriate care and responsiveness

to descended Native Alaskan communities. So the Bureau of Land Management and

with our partner, US Fish and Wildlife, we're responsible for ensuring the care

of these collections - they came from BLM and Fish lands.

According to 36CFR79, the Curation regulations covers preexisting

collections, basic professional standards for providing preservation protection,

and appropriate access and use. Of course NAGPRA requires the agencies to inventory

collections of the human remains and cultural items and report those to Indian

tribes, and through consultation determine affiliation - who has rights to

the remains and cultural items. These responsibilities apply, regardless of

physical custody or possession. So from 1907, 1915, and 1948, we have 3 collections

from expeditions I walked you through. They were from federal lands and they were

housed at the Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology in Cambridge, Massachusetts.

The collections were actually not made under a permit issued under the Antiquities

Act, so there was no firm trail, but they were from federal land. So the BLM

had collections and potentially repatriation responsibilities and didn't

even know their collections existed. This is one of the challenges we face. However

we did learn about the collections over time. In 2001, Peabody Museum contacted

the BLM lead archaeologist in Alaska inquiring about land status of several

locales. Well BLM often knows land, and we know land

jurisdiction. So my colleague went through the list of locales the Peabody

asked about and identified GLO, General Land Office or Bureau of Land Management,

US Fish and Wildlife Service, US Forest Service, State, or Other, and specifically

identified BLM locales named Flaxman, Jones, and Twin Islands. Oh,

and St. Lawrence Island, the first two expeditions I mentioned. So a strong focus

at this time in 2000-2001 - NAGPRA's enacted in 1990 so about ten, eleven years later -

a strong focus of museums and federal agencies regarding museum

collections was the need to address Native American human remains and

inventory requirements. Some museums were figuring out the scope of their

responsibilities. Their collection was federal land, and they could identify the

agency, maybe that would become the agency's priority and not theirs. But

responsibility was not always fully clear, and there are different

perspectives and interpretations that have evolved over time. So

for instance, wouldn't an institution that sponsored

expeditions and actively made these collections, have some responsibilities

to inventory them for this repatriation statute? Well there are different

interpretations on this. But after a few exchanges between the museum and the

BLM in 2001 and outreach to the respective tribes, the matter

actually lay dormant. In 2009 I come on the scene and I was contacted by a

consultant working for the Chaluka native corporation, letting us know about

the 1948 Laughlin material. We initiated a discussion with the Peabody

Museum about that collection, which apparently had not been tagged as

potentially from federal lands. Our need to address NAGPRA remained urgent and

compounded by learning of this other collection which turned out to be quite

sizable, 16 individuals, approximately 1,600 artifacts. The Peabody Museum

acknowledged the BLM's assertion of control and responsibility

for the collection, and explained that all services and activities the museum

would now charge the BLM. This was not a unique stance but happened to change from

other museums and universities we have worked with where we had partnered, perhaps with

some financial support, but nevertheless collaborated on this inventory and

documentation work. But this was to be a contractual relationship. The BLM

requested estimates to inventory the collection so that we could complete our

baseline NAGPRA work. The following year my

colleague, BLM Alaska archaeologist visited the museum in 2010, met with staff

and learned that there was no active research on collections. and that they no longer had an

active Arctic Studies program. Further, that their facility was quite full and

that the museum would be amenable to transferring the collection to another

institution. So the BLM then requested an estimate for both an inventory of the

collection and to ship it. At first, we had aimed to partner with the museum to

complete the NAGPRA work but really, over time, it seemed appropriate to move their

collection given some of the capacity constraints that the museum had. And so

we looked to another partner and specifically the University of Alaska

Museum of the North in Fairbanks, which is the main repository for

archaeological collections in Alaska, with whom the BLM and other federal

agencies have a very strong relationship with the state-run institution. We had

completed several successful NAGPRA projects and also just general

collections management work with them. And we note, and we had relied upon them

for their technical support, their ample Arctic expertise, their knowledge

of sites, locales, artifacts, and importantly, relationships with Native Alaskan

villages. And while at first we were focused on the NAGPRA

collection, we then looked at the entirety of the collection materials - the

human remains and certain classes of artifacts, but then everything

to move to the Museum of the North. The proximity, expertise, and

relationships would help with NAGPRA, and for the non-NAGPRA material, the

collections could be incorporated into the Museum of the North's collections,

part of an active research and education program for the university, immediate

Fairbanks community, Alaska more broadly, including extension programs across the

state. The Museum of the North was also very interested in returning collections

to Alaska as so many collections have been made from their state during

these historic expeditions and dispersed across the lower 48 states and beyond.

We had consulted with Native villages who had requested that their ancestors

be returned home, and also that all of the collections from their communities

be returned to Alaska. And I'll also note that in the 1990s, 2010s was

not the first time many of these villages had asked about the collections

that had been made. Through some archival research for this project and another

one, I found a lot of requests, especially in the 1970s for, where village leadership

is asking archaeologists if they come and dig, to leave the materials there or

ship them back. And in fact in 1977, William Laughlin, who's

kind of been an interesting character to me but the more

I get to know him through archives, the more complex character - in 1977 he frantically

tried to create a museum in the village of Nikolski, and laid out some pretty

extensive plans and lining up funding. He was also looking towards his

retirement, and while I've just been talking about what was at Harvard

Peabody, remember he made another 19, 20 trips to Alaska.

And all that material was in Connecticut and would need to go

somewhere. Ultimately a museum in the village of Nikolski was not constructed.

That collection actually ended up in the Museum of the Aleutians. So why Museum

of the North? Sorry, just to kind of catch you up on this institution and

requisite facilities, community relationships. So a plan was forming, key

details not settled, and over the next several years, discussions circled

between the agency asking for estimates and the museum actually asking to verify

control - that the BLM did indeed have legal responsibility. And I will say

we're kind of a…we're not looking for work.

This is not intended as any kind of overreach, we were trying to ensure that

we met our obligations under the statute to descendant communities and to the

American public for the broader collection.

So the BLM and the Peabody are trying to, at the same time, BLM and the

Peabody are going through and trying to research and refine the information

about the collections because at this point we still don't have the full

inventory listing of the materials. So why wasn't this addressed sooner, why is

this taking so long? Land jurisdiction, not always clear, takes

expertise and time to verify. The Laughlin collection included materials

from sites on BLM lands, US Fish and Wildlife Service lands,

and it was all in one museum accession. So the museum looked at

it as one collection, and we would break it apart based on site or locale to

figure out land jurisdiction. And then the Navy had this interesting

relationship to this because remember, the Navy helped fund the expedition. And

so there was some thought that maybe the Navy had some authority over this

collection. Well, don't you love archives? We got a copy of the contract for Navy

research, which had nothing to do with the archaeological research

that was done, all having to do with the medical examinations and,

incidentally, the Navy wouldn't have had the authority to authorize the

excavation on another agency's lands. But we had to sort all of that out and

unravel it all and distill it simply down to collections from BLM or General

Land Office land - BLM responsibility, from Fish and Wildlife Service land - Fish and

Wildlife Service, Navy had no part. So finally in January of 2017, the matter

of control was settled and the Peabody agreed to move forward with transferring

the collection. By then cost estimates were irrelevant, because the BLM Bureau

of Land Management, Fish and Wildlife Service, and the University of Alaska

Museum of the North, along with some local support from the National Park

Service in Charlestown, Massachusetts, next door to Cambridge, we formalized a

plan and in July 2017 we met with the Peabody staff, inventoried,

packed, and shipped the collection. So our final negotiations with the Peabody

resulted in transfer documents that we all signed, we agreed to the terms,

they assembled the collection and they provided us a space to work, inventory,

and pack, and they provided us a full catalog from their database. And over the

next few months, according to our agreement, museum staff diligently

supplied scans of all of the relevant associated documentation and records,

like field notes, that helped put these materials into context. The records are

critical to the research values and helping identify

descendant groups with rights to claim the human remains and other cultural

items. It's not just about the objects. So inventory and pack we did. Our process was

careful, planned - museum people are the best. These materials are fragile, delicate,

unique, sensitive, so the pressure was on to do a good and thorough job and

we documented every step of the way. So we track and locate an item with its

catalog number, we know which box it is in, which pallet it's on. Hyper

inventory tracking, because this is irreplaceable material. Now I also want

to pause and mention that, again, the Native Alaskan ancestors, these are the

boxes that they were in and I mentioned the dissertation, and I'm including this

plate which is from the dissertation this is the only plate, of the

11 skulls used for comparative research in the dissertation, this is the only one

that is a plate in the dissertation. So I noted that it has a

number, so I hurriedly went back to my team and asked do we have this one? My

team said no. We went back through all of the photos, we went back through the

photos the museum provided us, we went back through the photos that we took, we didn't have it.

So this one's still out there. I have a feeling it might be at the University of Oregon,

which is where Laughlin went next on his journey, and we are actually in

discussions right now with the University of Oregon for the Laughlin

collections that are there. Okay. It's hard not to get a little personal about

this. So more action. We loaded up our cargo vans and packed our boxes on

pallets and ultimately we had 4 pallets containing 21 boxes, 18 boxes of

human remains, those 38 individuals, and the hardest working team. And a couple of

Alaska Airlines flights later, the Museum of the North retrieved these

individuals and these artifacts in Fairbanks and brought them to the next

phase of their journey. And where they remain today,

almost a year later, the Museum of the North. The Bureau of Land

Management has been reaching out to the descendent communities who all

have an interest, I've listed them here because there are many given the nature

of the Alaska village corporation arrangement. So we're initiating

consultation and at the same time going through the collections that we

received from the Peabody and trying to connect it with the documentation that

was provided by the museum, as well as other information that we found. There

are 120 boxes of archival material from Laughlin in

Anchorage, for instance. So trying to put the collections

into context so we know where they came from, so that we can hurry their return

home if they're going be repatriated. If they're not subject to NAGPRA, that

information is valuable as their research interest. So over the last

century, as I mentioned, researchers across the US and Europe explored Native

villages and archaeological sites across Alaska, and this case is just but one. What

I find so interesting as I delve further into this project and those

related to it, because each one leads to another, the history of archaeological

and anthropological research in Alaska, and the number and complexity of

expeditions and the resulting collections. Massive quantities

of artifacts excavated from Alaska and subsequently curated in museums in the

lower 48, in Europe, and Canada. And part of what we're tracking is the history

of museums, for museums often would try to produce an encyclopedic

collection and have something from everywhere. But more and more, that focus is

more focused in on particular regions and regional institutions like the

Museum of the North or some of the other institutions that the BLM works with out

of the western states. There's a unique connection between the items,

the sites and the items, and the institution. People don't like their heritage to move

far away. So today, federal agencies and museums

curating federal collections, we have to collaborate on achieving our shared goals for

the best use and care of the museum materials. And while this case study

presents reasons for transferring a collection from one institution to

another, and these transfers can be complex, expensive,

time-consuming, and take much longer than you think they should, ultimately trying

to make a decision that's in the best interest of the collection and its

availability and benefit to the public, where there is current curatorial

research interest, access to expertise, and to honor the wishes of descendant

groups and source communities. And also to reveal some of the challenges of what

it means to manage collections for the long term or in perpetuity. Which is,

from the museum's viewpoint, in 1907, 1915, and 1948, Harvard Peabody was

actively trying to assemble a broad and extensive encyclopedic collection.

So where else do we go from here? I mentioned that each

one of these leads to another one. But for now, on this particular project,

having started it all those many years ago, we took a moment to celebrate a

major milestone in bringing these collections home but remain focused on

getting them the last leg of their journey. Thank you. [Applause]

For more infomation >> Far from Home: Bringing Archaeological Collections & Tribal Ancestors Home to Alaska - Duration: 52:23.

-------------------------------------------

Audi Q2 1.4 TFSI CoD 150pk S tronic Design - Duration: 1:11.

For more infomation >> Audi Q2 1.4 TFSI CoD 150pk S tronic Design - Duration: 1:11.

-------------------------------------------

Is Caffeine Why You Feel Like S&#T? - Duration: 6:46.

all right so let's speak about caffeine and why it really may be the reason

you're feeling like crap feeling tired you know paradoxically caffeine actually

makes a lot of people tired and many people don't realize this many people in

fact don't realize how strong caffeine is because it is a drug it's a stimulant

it has profound effects on the brain but it's something that people underestimate

just because of how widespread its use is I think it's somewhere of upwards of

70 to 80 percent of Americans at least have at least one cup of coffee or some

sort of a beverage that contains caffeine a per day so it's extremely

widely used but misunderstood so basically how caffeine works is that

when you ingest it it blocks something called adenosine which naturally builds

up as you get more tired so basically it blocks this so it prevents you from

getting tired and increases things like cortisol the stress hormone and this

also leads to you being more alert as well as increasing things like

catecholamines like norepinephrine increasing ketone bodies caffeine

actually mobilizes fat too so you know caffeine is great it helps with your

physical performance it's been shown in studies to help with

the working memory but the problem is that these benefits are short-lived

after you become dependent on caffeine because once you're actually dependent

on caffeine and it only takes about a cup of coffee per day for this to occur

all you're doing by giving yourself that boost physically or mentally or both is

alleviating the withdrawal symptoms you experience so you go to bed you wake up

you feel tired you feel like crap because you're having withdrawals from

the caffeine you have your coffee and the cycle continues as you continuously

think that you're getting a benefit from caffeine but in fact if you were to go

off caffeine if you were to allow receptors in the brain to re sensitize

then over time you would feel just as good if not better without a dependency

on something like caffeine what caffeine is actually doing in the body isn't

creating energy right it's basically giving you an advanced on energy it's

giving you energy and then it's gonna take that away late

as you crash your ballroom energy and once you get in the cycle of

continuously borrowing energy and never using any of your own you're gonna feel

it with some negative side effects of caffeine there are some other negatives

of caffeine increased risk of anxiety especially if you're already prone to

that it's going to exacerbate that because of the increase in cortisol that

it causes and now let me be clear I'm not saying it's bad I'm not saying that

having a cup a day is as bad if you can manage with that and that's perfectly

okay even to I mean there are many correlation studies which link caffeine

to a decreased risk of degenerative brain disorder disorders like

Alzheimer's there's even a correlation with a longer life for those who consume

more coffee up to four cups a day generally teens tends to be optimal for

life expectancy when looking at correlation studies these are just

correlations but you know certainly caffeine isn't something that's

dangerous to the extent of other narcotics obviously but um what I am

saying is that we are in general drinking too much and I don't advise

that you drink it to the extent where it becomes something you're dependent on

that's never a good idea to be dependent on something it's always good to have

your baseline your normal self where you're not stimulating yourself with

caffeine or nicotine or alcohol and then use it as a boost when required for

example before a workout or on a day where you feel particularly tired

rather than utilizing it as a crutch everyday in order to get up and live

your life now again I'm not saying that that's a bad thing you can do that but

if you personally have been feeling tired and you're not sure why maybe even

anxious maybe even your performance in the gym isn't as you want it to be and

you've been consuming caffeine on a regular basis for a long time and

gradually building up the dose of it as you become more tolerant to it then I

would highly recommend decreasing it not permanently not I'm not saying that's

the best course of action but if you haven't and you've been doing it for

five years and you might as well give yourself a few weeks where you go off

the caffeine just to see how your body responds now do be warned that you will

experience withdrawal symptoms from stopping the use of caffeine especially

if you go cold turkey and you completely eliminate it you're probably going to be

bed bound if you've been reliant on several couple of coffee per day for

several years so you know a good idea it can be to slowly kill it cut it down by

drinking decaf mixing it with decaf you know reducing the cups of coffee from

three one week to two the next week to one the next week or you could just call

go cold turkey and brace through those first few days of feeling like crap but

you know through my own personal experience and other anecdotes I've read

online after you do quit caffeine you're going to have much more stable energy

instead of having that cup of coffee in the morning feeling that energy and then

crashing a few hours later the energy that you do have although it may not be

as intense and exciting and euphoric the moment you wake up will be much more

gradual and you'll be more productive overall paradoxically as you have more

stable energy to take you through from morning to night so that's definitely

something you want to consider the best part about reducing your caffeine intake

and you know ideally eliminating it almost completely is that when you do

use it when you want to use it for example if you're very tired and you

still want to go to the gym but you really need a boost when you do use it

in that circumstance you're actually going to feel the positive effects of it

and get a real benefit rather than just alleviating the withdrawal symptoms you

were experiencing so that's probably the best part so I

highly advise that you form a relationship with caffeine more similar

to the one most people have with alcohol you know wake up and have a drink you

know you have a drink on the weekend to have fun with your friends for example

if you do that if you don't it's fine and just like that it's good to have

that relationship with caffeine where you use it once in a while for a workout

once in a while when you need to do an all-nighter for a project you're working

on that's kind of the relationship I think you should have with any sort of

stimulating substance which does have profound impacts on the brain so that's

it for the video leave your thoughts down below on caffeine and I'll I'll see

you guys later

For more infomation >> Is Caffeine Why You Feel Like S&#T? - Duration: 6:46.

-------------------------------------------

Jacque Fresco - Trabajando con las personas (2010) - Duration: 1:59.

For more infomation >> Jacque Fresco - Trabajando con las personas (2010) - Duration: 1:59.

-------------------------------------------

BMW X6 5.0d M Head-up/21inch/Schuidak/Dealer onderhouden - Duration: 1:10.

For more infomation >> BMW X6 5.0d M Head-up/21inch/Schuidak/Dealer onderhouden - Duration: 1:10.

-------------------------------------------

Mercedes-Benz 190 2.0 D - Duration: 1:09.

For more infomation >> Mercedes-Benz 190 2.0 D - Duration: 1:09.

-------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------

Return to the Beginning「Splatoon 1 🦑🧓」 - Duration: 1:13:17.

For more infomation >> Return to the Beginning「Splatoon 1 🦑🧓」 - Duration: 1:13:17.

-------------------------------------------

Is There a Safe Way to Use Your Phone and Drive? - Duration: 5:06.

This episode is supported by NordVPN which is offering SciShow viewers a chance

to set up a Virtual Private Network and start protecting your internet experience.

Use the code "SCISHOW" at NordVPN.com/SCISHOW for 77% off of a 3-year plan.

♩

Everyone's heard that distracted driving is dangerous, and there's a mountain of studies backing that up.

Almost 400,000 Americans are killed or injured annually in distracted driving-related crashes.

But people all over the world still do it anyway.

In the US, drivers use phones in 88% of car trips.

At least a quarter of teenagers have texted while driving, a quarter of adults say texting or emailing doesn't make their driving worse,

and lots more think other distractions, like talking on the phone, aren't harmful.

Which just… doesn't seem to add up.

We're overconfident, mostly because our brains don't show us how much distractions really affect our driving, which gets us into life-or-death situations.

Ultimately, the problem with distracted driving is multitasking: paying attention to multiple thoughts or tasks at once.

Decades of research have shown that it doesn't matter whether you think you're great or terrible at multitasking, because humans are straight-up awful at it.

You make more mistakes when you're switching focus between multiple tasks, because switching takes time

anywhere from a fraction of a second to half a minute when you're driving while doing something else.

And that transition time leads to missed details and mistakes.

Plus, you have a sort of blindness to one task while you're focused on another.

So you might think you're batting a thousand, because you don't know how much you're missing.

And that's one reason it can be tough to convince people that their distracted driving is dangerous.

Research in driving simulators shows that drivers talking on their cell phones miss as much as half of what happens around them

stop signs, exit ramps, other cars, pedestrians, you name it.

And when you ask them afterwards, they just say those things weren't there.

Now, some of you are probably thinking that maybe this is true for other people, but you really are a good multitasker.

But here's the thing: more confident multitaskers do worse on multitasking tests, not better.

And same goes for multitasking tests that involve driving:

the more comfortable a driver is with multitasking, the worse they tend to be at it.

Confident or not, distracted drivers are significantly more likely to be injured or killed, or hurt someone else.

So it's a serious issue, and one that every single one of us can prevent.

Not all distractions are created equal, though.

Adult drivers generally don't get in more accidents if they're eating or drinking, as long as it's non-alcoholic.

But passengers are an interesting middle ground.

Younger drivers get in more accidents when they have passengers in the car, especially people their own age.

But that increased risk goes down as drivers get older.

Which is actually true for most distractions.

Surveys show that younger drivers aren't as good at identifying and responding to hazards like merging roads or swerving cars, so they choose worse times to be distracted.

They're also about 5-10% more likely to think certain distracting behaviors like talking on the phone don't affect their driving.

But talking on the phone really does, no matter a driver's age.

Like in driving simulations, adults are just as impaired as drunk drivers are and crash more when they're talking on the phone.

And by tracking drivers' eye movements in real life and in simulations, researchers have found that drivers on the phone or doing comparable tasks only look at a fraction of the road.

There's no measurable difference between holding the phone and using a hands-free device or voice recognition software like Siri.

Even if laws and our unaware brains say otherwise.

The danger of a phone call isn't that your hand is off the wheel.

It's that your attention is off the road.That's why the device doesn't matter.

But talking to a passenger in the car is a little different, because they actually can see what's going on around you, and, like, pause the conversation while you find your exit or merge into that lane.

Finally, researchers gathered data from cars with cameras and sensors to study about a thousand serious crashes,

meaning there was property damage or injuries.

And they found that texting, dialing, and reaching for the phone are about the most dangerous things that many people do while driving.

Things like eating and listening to music, especially for experienced drivers, aren't tasks that demand focus from your brain.

And even if your bite is a little off or you miss lyric here or there, who cares?

More dangerous distractions require more of your focused attention, because getting the details of your text conversation right often means getting details of the road wrong.

When hundreds of studies say phones aren't safe, we should listen.

Even if it means having some good ol' fashioned silence after your podcast ends.

And not only are phones not safe for drivers, there's a chance your phone might not be safe when you're online as well.

That's why NordVPN is offering SciShow viewers 77% off of a 3 year plan to set up a Virtual Private Network.

Whether you're on your phone or your laptop, your connection to the internet is not always completely safe, especially if you're using a public network.

But with a Virtual Private Network from NordVPN, your information is encrypted and sent via one of their secure servers.

They have over 4800 in 62 countries and they're always adding more.

Plus, one NordVPN plan can be used on up to six devices, so no matter where you're surfing on your phone, you'll be safe--just don't do it while you're driving!

Right now you can use the code "SCISHOW" and sign up at NordVPN.com/SciShow to get 77% off a 3-year VPN plan.

But this discounted offer is going to end soon, so make sure you sign up now.

♩

For more infomation >> Is There a Safe Way to Use Your Phone and Drive? - Duration: 5:06.

-------------------------------------------

Sephora VIB Sale Recommendations - Top Product Picks That You Need To Buy - Duration: 16:04.

hello gorgeous welcome back to my

channel today I am talking about one of

the best sales of the year that is not

related to Christmas and that is the

Sephora sale

I mean it is every girl who loves makeup

favorite sale of the year because you

get to get literally anything in the

store at a discount which doesn't

usually happen throughout the year so

I'm going to jump right in and show you

guys the products that I would be

spending my money on if I were y'all

at the sale so let's get started alright

guys excuse the noise because I have a

very needy little almost a month old

downstairs with daddy and if he even so

much as leaves her line of vision it's a

disaster so if you hear a fuss and

that's why but okay let's jump right

into the Sephora vib sale and I'm saying

be as in beauty not P as in Paul and I'm

gonna explain to you exactly what it is

because if you're new to it then you're

gonna be like what the heck what's

what's up so what it is is that when you

are an insider so basically you know you

give them your email address and and

every time you buy sales you accumulate

points and when you hit certain brackets

throughout the year of spending it gets

you to a different level so the levels

are Rouge vib and insider so Rouge is

the top tier and that started on August

24th so the sale goes until September

3rd they got earliest access because

they're the top tier of spenders and

they get 20% off of their purchases

during the sale the next is the vib and

that is that starts on the 30th which

I'm filming today on the 29th but this

video will be up on the 30th and so

today it's open to both the VIPs and the

insiders VIPs get 15% off of everything

and insiders get 10% off of everything's

just so that you know and this is in

store and online by the way it's not

An Giang info

Thursday, August 30, 2018

Youtube daily report Aug 30 2018

No comments:

Post a Comment