... Continuation
fish on
and done
this is bigger
but still small
for the size we want but...
for a day that seemed to turn out to be very bad
I can not complain
beautiful
it's complicated
It seems I'm at sea
this spot has depth
It t has food
and has shade, but the boats have just passed
and if this spot got a fish he had gone away
I'll try it there, it's been a few seconds
maybe one is already there
maybe...
yes, there...
fish on
this is the fish
more one beautiful Barbel
and release
when are not the boats are the jet skis
there...
and done
he stole the blackberry again
This is an expert in stealing blackberries.
but...
I'll catch him
let´s try with a smaller one
here he is
what a bath
This one don´t fought much and already has a good size
but I got him
beautiful
fish on
I do not have any structure here
it's not deep, I'm with 2.6 meters , there are some herbs in the bottom
but they are not big
there are bigger herbs here
but the fish is above these herbs
this is bigger
much bigger
beautiful
fat
this one is more beautiful
let´s release
one more
almost
and done
Barbel here seems a bit bigger
this is a beautiful fish too
this is my last cast
need to go home
look
so many blackberries there
What do you think will happen?
What will happen is that the hook break
and with this I say goodbye
lost another hook
my line is very thin
and near the logs breaks but no problem
I got some
I think so, got some fish
is 13:00 time to lunch
By today it's enough
was very fun
remember in the morning when I said I will be fishing down there
is that place there
that was the place where I did the intro
now we will go back
I will luch, be with the family and cya
For more infomation >> Barbel with blackberry - continuation- 4k - Duration: 9:15.-------------------------------------------
Volkswagen Caddy 2.0 TDI 102 pk L1H1 Airco, Bijrijdersstoel, Bluetooth, Radiosysteem v.a. 179,- p/mn - Duration: 1:10.
For more infomation >> Volkswagen Caddy 2.0 TDI 102 pk L1H1 Airco, Bijrijdersstoel, Bluetooth, Radiosysteem v.a. 179,- p/mn - Duration: 1:10. -------------------------------------------
Treino de FORÇA não é só para ESTÉTICA! | Ciência do Corpo S01E07 - Duration: 19:36.
For more infomation >> Treino de FORÇA não é só para ESTÉTICA! | Ciência do Corpo S01E07 - Duration: 19:36. -------------------------------------------
CM-バファリン - Duration: 0:16.
For more infomation >> CM-バファリン - Duration: 0:16. -------------------------------------------
🔴 ARENA OF VALOR PARTIDAS CLASIFICATORIAS EN DIRECTO - Duration: 2:52:51.
For more infomation >> 🔴 ARENA OF VALOR PARTIDAS CLASIFICATORIAS EN DIRECTO - Duration: 2:52:51. -------------------------------------------
Anticipazioni Beautiful, puntate americane: la gravidanza di Hope è in pericolo - Duration: 4:41.
For more infomation >> Anticipazioni Beautiful, puntate americane: la gravidanza di Hope è in pericolo - Duration: 4:41. -------------------------------------------
Cop put on leave for tattoo linked to antigovernment group - Duration: 6:45.
A police officer in North Carolina has been put on paid leave after being photographed with a tattoo associated with a national antigovernment group, throwing his ability to "function effectively" as a cop into question, according to the department's chief
Chapel Hill Police Officer Cole P. Daniels, who joined the department in 2014, was placed on leave Monday after being photographed earlier this month with a distinctive tattoo – a Roman numeral three encircled by stars — associated to the Three Percenters, a group considered by the Southern Poverty Law Center to be among the antigovernment movement that had a resurgence following the election of President Obama in 2008
Daniel Hosterman, a photographer in Durham, told The News & Observer he took a photograph of Daniels as he stood near the Silent Sam Confederate monument, which was toppled on Aug
20 by protesters on campus at the University of North Carolina. But Chapel Hill's police chief has known about the tattoo since at least February, according to the newspaper
That's when Police Chief Chris Blue left a voicemail for Megan Squire, a computer science professor at Elon University who gave a presentation to UNC-Chapel Hill students that included a photograph of Daniels' tattoo that was taken at a rally in June 2017, the News & Observer reports
"I'm calling you to thank you for calling attention to a tattoo that one of my officers has that apparently slipped through our cracks," Blue told Squire on the voicemail
"I would love to hear a little more about how you came across the picture depicting him and share a little bit about my thoughts on how we move forward
" Squire — who had been dealing with backlash from a Wired profile on her database that tracks far-right extremists — didn't return Blue's message, which she regrets
"I think it was a missed opportunity for me as an educator," Squire, 45, told the newspaper
Blue confirmed that Daniels had been placed on administrative leave in a statement to the News & Observer, but did not respond to questions from the newspaper about his response to the initial report of Daniels' tattoo in February
"The pervasiveness of the concerns raised by many regarding his display of a tattoo that is associated with the '3 Percenters' has caused the Department to question his ability to function effectively as a police officer within this community," Blue's statement read
"Therefore, the Police Department initiated an administrative investigation in accordance with our Town's Personnel Ordinances and policies and procedures
" Daniels will remain on leave pending the outcome of the investigation. Any disciplinary action will be taken after consulting with the town's manager and attorneys, Blue said
Messages seeking additional comment from Blue were not immediately returned Friday, but a Chapel Hill spokeswoman referred The Post to a statement from Town Manager Roger Stancil that indicated no further information will be released on the personnel matter
"We are making note of your interview request," spokeswoman Catherine Lazorko wrote in an email
"After any major community event, we take the time needed to evaluate many aspects — including our roles in public safety aspects, successful coordination with partnering agencies, and the costs associated
We are doing this now. We will follow up after this process to provide relevant information to the public and to schedule interviews with the media
" The Three Percenters, meanwhile, is a collection of "patriotic citizens who love their country, their freedoms, and their liberty," according to its website
"We are committed to standing against and exposing corruption and injustice," the website continues
"We are NOT a militia … Being a Three Percenter is a more of way of life rather than a club to join
" The group also denounces its "anti-government" label, instead insisting its members are "very pro-government, so long as the government abides by the Constitution," according to its website
"Our goal is to utilize the fail-safes put in place by our founders to reign [sic] in an overreaching government and push back against tyranny," the website continues
"… There is often a misconception that we are wanting to overthrow the government
This is simply not true and a false rumor to try and paint our movement as anti-government
"
-------------------------------------------
Danilo Gossain, músico de sesión, conguero remoto ♫♪♫ - Duration: 5:35.
For more infomation >> Danilo Gossain, músico de sesión, conguero remoto ♫♪♫ - Duration: 5:35. -------------------------------------------
Custom Logo Jewelry
For more infomation >> Custom Logo Jewelry-------------------------------------------
Turquia critica EUA por comportamento inadequado em relação aos sistemas russos S-400 - Duration: 2:14.
For more infomation >> Turquia critica EUA por comportamento inadequado em relação aos sistemas russos S-400 - Duration: 2:14. -------------------------------------------
DOLL SWIM // BIKINI HAUL TRY ON - Duration: 6:53.
hi guys welcome back to my channel if
you've never been here before welcome my
name is Christine so today I have yet
another swim haul for you guys I have
all these suits from doll swim so super
excited to show you guys and I'm gonna
try them on and review them for you I
also have a Zaful swim haul and an
amazon swim haul so if you haven't seen
those I'll link it up in the corner and
before we go ahead and get started you
know the drill
hit the subscribe button if you haven't
already and hit the little notification bell
and let's go ahead and get started and
this is actually a workout top from
forever 21 and I realize that it's kind
of like crooked. So the first suit I have
is the super-cute palm tree print on
camera it looks like a brighter bikini
but it's actually like a dark purple
burgundy like it's not as bright as it
looks in camera and it's super cute I
like that their logo super like subtle
it's just like a little tab that says
doll on it and the palm the little palm
design is so cute there's not any
padding on it but I don't mind it
because it looks really good on my
boobies I just don't have anything
that's just design and I think it's
really pretty on the strings like
everything fits me good I got this one
in a size small and the bottom I got in
a size medium I originally got it in a
size small but because it is like ruched
it kind of looked too small on my bum so
I had to get a size medium so if you are
at the same like measurements as I am
I'd recommend sizing up in the style and
I'll actually put my body measurements
as always down in the description box
and these ones are really flattering it
has it a little logo right here and the
ruching just makes your bum look so cute
and it's just really flattering on I
love that it's like an adjustable string
bottom the one thing I will say is it's
kind of like low coverage I feel like a
lot of shrimp bottoms especially since
this one is ruched don't really have a
lot of like coverage in the front or the
back so you kind of have to be wary of
like it not sliding down too much in the
front and showing my butt crack in the
back but I think it's super flattering
and I love the matching set and yeah I
think this one does a good one next I
have this sue and I have always been a
fan of this cut I feel like I try to
order so many types of suits like this
but none of them have ever fit me quite
right but this one actually fits me
really really nicely and I
get both of them in a study small it's
just like a beautiful beautiful olive
like muted olive color and it's so
flattering on all skin tones and this
fabric is super soft like it feels a lot
better than like the Amazon or example
ones that I have it's just really
flattering on it doesn't have any
padding or anything just a good simple
top it's secure so this one would be
nice if I was like wanting to go out and
play sports you can even wear it I was
like a bra top I've worn these black
Tesla tops I was like clean tops before
and I just love the fabric I love the
color bottoms are high-waisted bottoms
and these ones are so flattering on they
make your butt look really good and
Brandon isn't really a fan of the
swimsuit but we don't dress boys all the
time right I really like it I think it
makes my bum look super cute and it
snapped is in the waist so I've always
been a fan of these style suits and
these bottoms and a size small fit me
like perfect okay and the next thing I
got is this triangle top and it is so
flattering on and as you can tell I'm a
big fan of all of this one is a slightly
darker olive color than my last one but
I think this is such a flattering fit it
holds my anybody's really well and there
isn't any padding in it but it looks
like there is a little like holder if
you want to slip in some little cups the
thing I like about this is there's no
laughs in the back so this thing is
pretty secure and it fits me perfectly
on top and I got it in a size small and
it's just it's just a finding the top
not very much to it gives you a minimal
tan lines and it's really secure so I
really like this bottoms are like these
high-waisted cheeky bottoms and I like
that these ones are not ruched in the
back because it kind of gives you some
coverage but I like that the sides are
really thin it's just flattering on the
fabric is really nice I love that the
inner layers the same color and yeah I
love this
the next one I got I did take a couple
pictures on my Instagram so I will put
it up in the corner this one has like an
extra and so when you put it on you kind
of put this over your body first and
then put on the triangle tops and then
tie it when it's on it looks really
pretty and it looks super sophisticated
and flattering and expensive I just
really like these tops the only thing I
will say is that all of them have like a
bright pink lining which kind of
reminded me of like Victoria's Secret
swimsuits but it's nice because a trim
is the same color
you never really see the bright pink and
this like rustic pink color is just so
pretty and it's really flattering on I'm
just now looking at the footage and tell
me why I didn't realize that my bottoms
were on backwards I love that it has
that little extra string in the bottom
it reminds me of Aria swimsuits but it's
a little bit more affordable than them
so I really like this one love the color
and then the bottoms look like this and
these ones are itty-bitty also and I did
get these in a size small but I probably
could have gotten them in a size medium
but they fit me well enough so I can get
away with wearing a small but if you are
a little bit bigger than I am I would
maybe size up the lining on this one is
pink so I don't like knowing as much I
love that it has a little ring detail
and these ones are not adjustable but
they fit me really well so really really
like okay the next two I got is this
triangle top it is super cute because
it's kind of like this knit material and
it's really flattering on I don't have
any like knit swimsuits and the one
thing I will say is it's not as stretchy
as like my other swimsuits but I get a
little bit dirty because it's it's like
Roche material it looks really good on
and it's like the type of suit that you
lay out and look you in but I feel like
if you were to spend a lot of time doing
like physical activities it might slowly
fall apart but it looks really expensive
on and it's really flattering if it's my
idiot videos really well and there's no
padding in it but it looks really good
and it fits me well and then the bottoms
I did have to get a size medium in
because they were just too small on me
and I really like these in the back it
has like a ruched detailing which is
really nice and it makes your butt look
really really good the one thing I will
say is because it's like a white bottom
and it's like a little bit more coverage
it kind of looks diapering ish it might
just be me because I'm a ho and I like
smaller bottoms but I think these are
really cute and I love that it's like
the matching knit material so that is it
I hope you guys enjoy let me know down
below which one was your favorite
swimsuit and what types of videos you
would like to see next and as always
thank you so much for watching and I'll
see you in the next video bye guys
-------------------------------------------
Ford S-Max 2.0-16V - Duration: 1:11.
For more infomation >> Ford S-Max 2.0-16V - Duration: 1:11. -------------------------------------------
Nissan Note 1.2 DIG-S ACENTA NED.AUTO, 1STE EIGENAAR, AIRCO, CRUISE CONTROL, BLUETOOTH, PARKEERSENSO - Duration: 1:08.
For more infomation >> Nissan Note 1.2 DIG-S ACENTA NED.AUTO, 1STE EIGENAAR, AIRCO, CRUISE CONTROL, BLUETOOTH, PARKEERSENSO - Duration: 1:08. -------------------------------------------
A Love Machine Scene | Transformers Revenge of the Fallen (2009) Movie Clip - Duration: 5:19.
- Here we are. - Hey!
You ever have a song stuck in your head? It's like
the worst song ever, but you can't help to whistle it or sing it
'cause it, like, repeats itself, repeats itself, repeats itself, repeats itself?
Kitten calendar, kitten calendar, kitten calendar,
- kitten calendar... - Dude, what the eff?
I know you're freaking out. Don't freak out. Don't freak out.
Easy fix. Puzzle code in my head.
Now it's on the walls. Everything is good.
This is the part that...
Okay, what were you saying?
Alice, I'm horrified you had to see this. Let's go.
Get out.
Wait, wait, wait! Can I just sit and watch?
I'll... I'll eat my pizza quietly.
Sam, I knew there was something special about you.
Really?
And I know you know what happens
when two people in the know get together.
They're genuinely amazing in bed.
Thank you.
All right, listen, hold on! Boundaries.
Flag on the play. Okay. I'm very ticklish.
We have needs, Sam. Relax.
Jeez!
What about this economy? It's crazy, isn't it?
- You are very aggressive. - Just relax.
You want some Turkey meatloaf?
Sam?
- Mikaela! - Is that your girlfriend?
Ex.
Mikaela! Wait!
I can explain...
Sam, your bed buddy, Alice...
All right, come on.
- She's coming! - She's an alien robot! You gotta move.
- Is this real? - Just run!
Oh, my God! Oh, my God! I can't believe I almost had sex with her in my dream!
I can tell that you really missed me a lot, Sam!
- Look, it's not my fault, okay? - It's not your fault?
Listen! Listen, I'm a victim!
- You were a victim? Of what? - Yeah.
- Of what, a little 80-pound girl? - Of... Of molestation.
It was like getting humped in the neck by a Mountain ox!
You didn't have to put your tongue in her mouth!
- I didn't! Look! - You did!
You ever had your stomach tongued by a Mountain ox with a five-foot tongue?
It's not fun for me, okay, Mikaela? And it smelled like... Like diesel!
- Like a diesel-y tinge to it! - You're such a little girl!
We're gonna have 10 seconds of silence right now.
I'm not talking to you for 10 seconds.
You can't give me the silent treatment! You know what?
I'm not talking to you for 10 seconds. You have three seconds left.
You know what? You can give me the silent treatment
all you want, but you can't keep me from talking.
- What were you gonna say? - I hope you had a lot of fun,
because this, this is over.
She violated your orifice with her nasty alien probe?
She did it? She went in there? All her little embryo alien babies
are gestating and hatching inside of you. They're growing right now, probably!
You need to vomit it right now. Yak it! Yak it right now!
Who are you?
I'm Leonardo Ponce De Leon Spitz. Okay? I'm the key to this.
The aliens, they want me 'cause of my site.
Whoa, guys, right there!
Run!
Mikaela!
Come on! We gotta move!
It's a bomb!
You've got to get that box!
- This way. - What? Hey! Let me out, let me out!
Oh, my God, you know how to hot-wire a car? That's so hot!
Drive, drive, drive! She's right there! She's right there!
Come on, come on, come on.
Go! Go! Go! Back up the car!
Now!
Tongue!
Oh, my God!
Kiss this, bitch!
Drive, drive, drive.
-------------------------------------------
ASMR - 👩ROLEPLAY DOCTORA | CRANIAL NERVE - Duration: 16:38.
Hello, How are you
Good, I'm glad,
Well well no, right? why else would you not be here
remember me your name please
ok
tell me why the last time you were here ...
ok
you have problems with the ear
What is the left or right?
you do not know...
ok, you get dizzy?
and you think it's from the ears
well let's do a cranial nerve exam as always
But I'll look at you more, the sight and the ear
becouse
we can think that it is from the ear
and maybe it's the view
yes..
let´see
I'm going to start looking at you eyes
let me take out the flashlight
let me see
keep calm
It's okay around here
look up
now please look here
left...
follow the ligth , please
yes...
ok
great
Does it bother you at some point?
no?, ok look up
down
thats is very good
It does not seem to have a bigger problem
we'll see
I'm going to check the ear
just one sec
here
I need you to tell me if this you can ear this
we repeat it
ok
Tell me, listen well on both sides?
you do not have it, ok
Well, I'm going to do a checkup
Deeper
yes...
ok
let me pick a cotton
I'm going to have to clean him up with this
because I do not have anything else, so maybe if he has some injury he will
you have to be brave
im gonna clean around here
Does it sting?
and here?
Does it tickle?
great
Well, let me check with the light
the ears
Now I'm going to give you a product
what is going ..
to .. disinfect everything
perfect
now I'm going to disinfect myself
Do you like the massage in the ears?
I will proceed to the extraction
I'm removing the outer part first
of your ear
you have a small plug in each ear
But it's not a big deal either, it should not give you...
it should not give you... a big problem this
if you say you have vertigo ...
maybe you have to look at your cervicals
Anyway, you accumulate a lot, a lot of wax
ok
the outside is already
now we have to do the extraction
from the inside part ok?
I'm going to make you a liquid to melt
and the wax comes out better
this is going to go inside your ear
do not worry
it's not bad
now, let's go for the other
to see here
very good
See how nothing happened?
let me clean now ...
perfect
let's see if there is any rest
perfect
This is very nice
OK, well, this is already
let's do the sound test again
did you hear it?
yes?
Do you think that by this you listen less?
Well now, you do not have anything at all
let's see I'm going to take a little oil
and I'm going to give you a massage, ok?
and with this we finish
very good
I remove the excess here
perfect
i will make a note
with all the treatment
cleaning
if you still have vertigos
you already have to give a massage ..
Yes yes why...
right now you do not have anything in your ears
you know as always, if you have
some annoyance or something ..
come back
ok ?
thank you
see you
-------------------------------------------
Channel intro - Duration: 1:34.
what's up guys my name is Dylan but I
like to call myself DP be my initials
bye boy my lucky number is eight nine
zero eight or eight thousand nine
hundred and eight which is why it's in
my youtube name welcome to my channel
perv you will be doing gaming videos
animations videos of my pets okay to me
do vlogs too sometimes they might even
do a random video that could be one
minute long or one hour although my
videos do usually range from 1020
minutes we sometimes go over now please
keep in mind I am just at Stine out as a
youtuber and I hope you get more subs in
the future some of the games are like
our overwatch spotty - mario odyssey no
man's sky and super smash brothers this
channel will be suitable for people 12
and above so stop watching if you are 11
or under or don't like oh I don't really
care I want a patreon page set up soon
so you can donate there although no one
probably will by the way if you know any
free animation software leave it down
below in the comments so I can use it to
animate my videos I will in the in the
description i will leave my discord
instagram twitter and tumblr
although it will probably never post
it's still worth looking at that's
really all I have to say about my
channel so subscribe if you want to make
sure to follow me on my social media and
stay fresh okay
-------------------------------------------
1308 LOGAN - Duration: 8:19.
For more infomation >> 1308 LOGAN - Duration: 8:19. -------------------------------------------
2Frères - Coin-Coin - Duration: 1:41.
For more infomation >> 2Frères - Coin-Coin - Duration: 1:41. -------------------------------------------
We Understand Tarkovsky, But Did Tarkovsky Understand Us? (Short Film) - Duration: 6:23.
For more infomation >> We Understand Tarkovsky, But Did Tarkovsky Understand Us? (Short Film) - Duration: 6:23. -------------------------------------------
500 miles. Across the Pyrenees: with a wheelchair - #smart500 Camino de Santiago - Duration: 8:06.
For more infomation >> 500 miles. Across the Pyrenees: with a wheelchair - #smart500 Camino de Santiago - Duration: 8:06. -------------------------------------------
BMW 1 Serie 116d EDE Executive Navi, PDC. L.M. Velgen - Duration: 1:12.
For more infomation >> BMW 1 Serie 116d EDE Executive Navi, PDC. L.M. Velgen - Duration: 1:12. -------------------------------------------
Citroën C3 PURETECH 110 S&S EAT6 SHINE *NIEUW* NAVI/SMILE(RIJKLAAR) - Duration: 1:13.
For more infomation >> Citroën C3 PURETECH 110 S&S EAT6 SHINE *NIEUW* NAVI/SMILE(RIJKLAAR) - Duration: 1:13. -------------------------------------------
Jacque Fresco - Ser Responsable - Duration: 2:26.
Many people have entrusted
their decision-making to government. Bingo!
Many people have also given that decision-making to the deity.
They create a deity, then they say
"He will make the most appropriate decision:
prevent my house from burning down, prevent my children from being killed
and help us along the way", but it's going to take time
for people to take on the responsibility of managing
this wonderful gift of nature: the earth
water, all the wonderful things we have, top soil
and we have to take care of the Earth. We have to assume responsibility.
We have brains
and the brains can be programmed in many different directions.
They can go into the abstract region
which has nothing to do with improving our lives.
We can invent reasons for nature
or we can say "I don't know how nature works"
and hold that in abeyance, and try to find out.
That's the difference between science and religion.
Religion has answers.
Many say "The Lord works in strange ways"
when they can't account for anything.
The scientist says "I don't know," and "What are you going to do about it?"
He goes into a lab to try to find out. What's the best shape for a boat?
What's the best arrangement for sails
to get the most effective movement from the wind?
He says "I don't know", so he sets up an experiment
and the experiment is truth-seeking
but tangibly truth-seeking
but philosophy and theology, you sit back on an arm chair.
You say "I guess the trees are here to give us oxygen."
The scientist says "The trees are here. They produce oxygen
and that enables us to survive. " Yet, they're not here for that purpose
because there are many remote islands that have trees
without any humans, producing oxygen.
There are many tidal waves that go over islands
without people on them, so they're not there to punish people.
(Interviewer) Humans are amazingly anthropomorphic.
-Terribly so. - Oh yeah, it's all about us.
- My mother used to be like that. She used to say
"The ant is going home to feed its young", and I said
"How do you know that? " Maybe it's going home to eat its young."
Like the spiders, they mate, then the female eats the male.
I'm not talking about pornography.
I'm talking about digesting them.
-------------------------------------------
SC17-1434 International Association of Firefighters Local S-20, et. al. v. State of Florida - Duration: 43:39.
FIREFIGHTERS UNION. WITH ME CO-COUNSEL RICH SWICA FROM ORLANDO AND CORY FROM CORAL GABLES.
IN PERTINENT PART THE RIGHT OF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES TO BARGAIN COLLECTIVELY SHALL NOT BE ABRIDGED.
>> WE KNOW FULLY THE BACKGROUND. CAN WE CUT INTO THIS. THIS HAS REALLY CONSTITUTIONAL CONUNDRUMS CONFLICT WITH THAT
POSITION, WELL ACKNOWLEDGED HIS TORE POSITION OF A GOVERNOR TO VETO LEGISLATIVE ACTION. >> THAT IS THE CONFLICT.
>> THIS IS WHERE WE COME DOWN HERE. IT SEEMS, IT IS VERY UNUSUAL THAT WHEN WE COME TO A
SITUATION, JUST STAND BACK FROM THIS. AVERAGE CITIZEN WOULD SAY THIS IS INSANITY WHERE YOU HAVE TWO
PARTIES THAT ARE AT ODDS OVER SOMETHING. THE GOVERNOR AND THE UNION OVER WHAT'S GOING TO BE, WHAT'S GOING
TO HAPPEN. THE PROVISION IT GOES TO THE LEGISLATURE AND THEN THE LEGISLATURE THEN DECIDES WHAT'S
GOING TO HAPPEN BUT IT'S WELL-KNOWN AT THAT POINT IN TIME THAT THE GOVERNOR WILL HAVE TO SIGN OFF AND THE GOVERNOR'S A
PARTY TO THAT DISPUTE. THAT TO ME IS THE EPITOME OF INSANITY. I MEAN TO SEE THAT CONFLICT, I
MEAN RIGHT THERE, IT IS JUST SO PLAIN. I THINK AN AVERAGE IT SEND COULD SEE THAT.
WHAT WOULD HAPPEN IF THIS COURT SHOULD DECLARE THE STATUTE, THE STATUTE PROVISION FOR GUBERNATORIAL, SOME WAY, IMPACT
THAT, THAT IMPASSE PROCEDURE TO TRY TO CIRCUMVENT THE GOVERNOR'S NEED TO APPROVE IT? >> THERE ARE TWO POSSIBILITIES.
POSSIBILITY NUMBER ONE IS, HE CAN'T BE JUDGE AND PARTY AT THE SAME TIME. >> AGREED.
I DON'T THINK ANYBODY IS DISPUTING THAT. >> SO THAT WOULD MEAN IT WOULD NOT BE COLLECTIVE BARGAINING IF
HE COULD HAVE HIS OWN WAY AT THE END OF THE PROCESS. >> I THINK THAT'S PRETTY OBVIOUS.
>> SO THAT'S ONE OF THE POSSIBILITIES. THE OTHER POSSIBILITY IS, SOMETHING THAT SURPRISED ME
ABOUT THE DISTRICT COURT'S DECISION. THEY NEVER MENTION WHAT THE CONSTITUTIONAL TEST IS FOR
RESOLVING SUCH A CONFLICT. AND YOU HELD IN THE ATTORNEY'S GUILD CASE AND CHILD TEACHERS CASE, THE RIGHT OF PUBLIC
EMPLOYEES TO BARGAIN COLLECTIVELY IS A FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT SUBJECT TO THE STRICT SCRUTINY RULE.
THAT WOULD MEAN, ALL RIGHT, YOU SAY THE GOVERNOR CAN STILL PARTICIPATE IN THIS PROCESS BUT IF HE DOES VETO WHAT THE
LEGISLATURE RESOLVED THE IMPASSE, HE HAS GOT TO PROVE THAT HE DID SO BY STRICT SCRUTINY.
IN THIS CASE-- >> SO DO YOU, ARE YOU URGING US TO ADOPT JUDGE THOMAS' DISSENT. IS THAT YOUR, WHAT RELIEF ARE
YOU SEEKING? WHAT WOULD YOU LIKE THIS COURT TO HOLD? >> I WOULD LIKE YOU TO HOLD HE
IS NOT INVOLVED IN THE PROCESS AT ALL. LET ME EXPLAIN WHY. BUT I RECOGNIZE--
>> BUT YOU SAID SOMETHING ABOUT STRICT SCRUTINY, COMPELLING STATE INTEREST. ISN'T THAT WHAT JUDGE THOMAS'
OPINION, DISSENT SETS FORTH WHICH DOESN'T REQUIRE DECLARING A STATUTE UNCONSTITUTIONAL? IT ALSO DOESN'T COMPLETELY
EVISCERATE THE GOVERNOR'S VETO AUTHORITY? >> I AM ONLY THE ADVISOR. I RECOGNIZE THAT THERE ARE THOSE
TWO LOGICAL POSSIBILITIES. YOU ASKED ME WHICH ONE I PREFER. I DON'T THINK HE SHOULD BE INVOLVED IN IT BECAUSE IT'S A
FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT. THE PEOPLE MADE NO EXCEPTION. IT'S THEIR GOVERNMENT. AND THEY SAID--
>> BUT WHAT I'M STRUGGLING WITH THIS HERE, LOOKING AT THE TEXT OF THE AMENDMENT. IT DOESN'T, IT DOES NOT
GUARANTY A PARTICULAR RESULT. THE RIGHT TO COLLECTIVE BARGAINING DOES NOT GUARANTY A PARTICULAR PATH TO A PARTICULAR
RESULT, DOES IT? >> NO. AS A MATTER OF FACT, THE LEGISLATURE COULD HAVE REVOLVED
THIS IF THEY WERE WITH THE GOVERNOR'S POSITION. BUT THEY DIDN'T. THAT IS THE POINT.
WE HAVE TO DEAL WITH IT THE WAY IT IS. >> SEEMS LIKE WE'RE TALKING ABOUT A CONFLICT BETWEEN THIS
PROVISION OF THE CONSTITUTION AND THIS FUNDAMENTAL FEATURE OF OUR CONSTITUTION, WHICH INVOLVES THE GOVERNOR'S VETO RIGHT OVER
LEGISLATION, WOULD YOU CONCEDE THAT THAT IS A FUNDAMENTAL ASPECT OF OUR SYSTEM OF GOVERNMENT?
>> YES AND NO, I KNOW THAT IS A LAWYER'S ANSWER BECAUSE THERE IS ANOTHER FUNDAMENTAL AND MUCH MORE FUNDAMENTALLY AND THAT'S
THE LIMITATION ON THE POWER OF GOVERNMENT CONTAINED IN THE DECLARATION OF RIGHTS. >> WHEN THIS WAS ADOPTED, THIS
RIGHT TO WORK PROVISION, THIS IS PART OF THE RIGHT TO WORK SECTION, WHEN THAT WAS ADOPTED, HOW IN THE WORLD WOULD THE
VOTERS LOOKING AT THAT HAVE UNDERSTOOD THAT THERE WAS GOING TO FLOW OUT OF THAT SOME IMPLICITLY, SOME LIMITATION ON
THE GOVERNOR'S AUTHORITY TO BE INVOLVED IN THE USE OF THE VETO, AND THAT SOMEHOW, THERE WERE GOING TO BE APPROPRIATIONS THAT
WOULD BE MADE, THAT THE GOVERNOR COULD DO NOTHING ABOUT? HE WOULD HAVE HIS VETO AUTHORITY, WOULD BE TOTALLY SET
ASIDE, THAT THAT ASPECT OF THE GUBERNATORIAL POWER UNDER OUR CONSTITUTION, WOULD BE SET ASIDE?
IF YOU LOOK AT THOSE WORDS, THAT FLOWS FROM THAT? THAT'S WHAT, I'M HAVING TROUBLE WRAPPING MY MIND AROUND THAT?
>> THIS COURT HAD TO ANSWER THAT RATHER EARLY ON BECAUSE THERE WERE, THE LEGISLATURE MET EVERY TWO YEARS AT THAT TIME.
THEY WENT THROUGH TWO SESSIONS WITHOUT DOING ANYTHING TO IMPLEMENT. IN RAND II JUSTICE ROBERTS
WRITING FOR THE COURT SAID, YOU WILL HAVE TO DO THAT AT THE NEXT SESSION OF THE LEGISLATURE OR WE'LL DO IT FOR YOU.
THEN HE WENT ON TO SAY THE ARGUMENT WHETHER PUBLIC EMPLOYEES SHOULD HAVE THE RIGHT TO BARGAIN COLLECTIVELY IS OVER.
QUOTE, THE PEOPLE HAVE SPOKEN, CLOSE QUOTE. >> THAT IS UNQUESTIONABLY TRUE. IT'S HERE.
IT'S IN THE CONSTITUTION BUT THE PRECISE CONTOURS OF THAT AND HOW THAT PROCESS FLOWS AND HOW IT REACH AS PARTICULAR CONCLUSION,
YOU CAN'T DIVINE FROM WHAT THOSE WORDS SAY, CAN YOU? >> IT MAY BECOME AWKWARD DEALING WITH THE STATE LEGISLATURE.
WORKS MUCH EASIER IN THE CITY OBVIOUSLY. MORE PEOPLE INVOLVED. LEGISLATURE DOESN'T MEET ALL
YEAR LONG BUT THAT DOESN'T DIMINISH THE RIGHT. THE RIGHT IS STILL THERE. IT IS NOT THAT DIFFICULT BECAUSE
ALL THAT REALLY HAPPENS, AND BY THE WAY, WHEN THEY FIRST IMPLEMENTED IT, THE RESOLUTION OF IMPASSE WAS BY ARBITRATION
WHICH IS COMMONLY DONE IN THE PRIVATE SECTOR. BUT THE LEGISLATURE REPEALED THAT.
SO THAT IS OUT. IF THE PARTIES HAVE NOT REACHED AGREEMENT, IF THEY'RE AT IMPASSE, THERE HAS TO BE, HAS TO
BE SOME CONSTITUTIONALLY AUTHORIZED THIRD PARTY DECIDER AND IN THIS CASE IT WAS THE LEGISLATURE.
THE BIG DIFFERENCE HERE THE LEGISLATURE APPROPRIATED THE MONEY AS WELL AS HAVING RESOLVED IT.
>> SOUNDS LIKE EVEN THOUGH IF YOU WOULD HAVE ARBITRATION AND IT REQUIRES LEGISLATIVE ACTION TO APPROPRIATE THE MONEY TO
SATISFY IT, IT IS STILL GOING TO FLOW UP TO THE GOVERNOR? >> THEY HAVE ALREADY APPROPRIATED THE MONEY.
THE QUESTION HERE WHICH IS FUNDAMENTAL, IS, CAN THE GOVERNOR USE HIS VETO POWER OVER THE BUDGET TO VIOLATE THE
FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF THE PEOPLE? HE COULD CANCEL ELECTIONS. HE COULD DO ANYTHING.
IT CAN NOT BE. I FEEL FOOLISH STANDING HERE THAT I'M ADVOCATING FOR THE IMPORTANCE OF THE DECLARATION OF
RIGHTS. THE DECLARATION OF RIGHTS IS BY DEFINITION A LIMITATION ON THE POWER OF THE GOVERNMENT NO
MATTER HOW BIG THAT POWER IS. THE GOVERNMENT CAN NOT USE, WHATEVER BRANCH, IT IS NOT JUST THIS GOVERNOR, ANY GOVERNOR,
EXECUTIVE POWER CAN NOT BE USED TO VIOLATE FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS UNLESS THE GOVERNMENT CAN SHOW THAT IT WAS A COMPELLING STATE
INTEREST AND THAT IT WAS THE LEAST INTRUSIVE WAY TO DO SO AND YOU SAID IN THE CHILES CASE, I THINK IT WAS A
700 MILLION-DOLLAR SHORTFALL IN A 28 BILLION-DOLLAR BUDGET. AND YOU SAID, THAT IS NOT A COMPELLING STATE INTEREST.
YOU ALSO SAID THAT POLITICAL NECESSITY EITHER. >> WAS CONTEXT THERE, REFRESH MY MEMORY ABOUT THAT.
THE CONTEXT THERE WAS ABOUT A CONTRACT THAT WAS ENTERED AND THE QUESTION WAS WHETHER THAT CONTRACT COULD BE SET ASIDE,
RIGHT? >> EXACTLY. >> THAT IS NOT SOMETHING WE'VE GOT HERE.
THIS HAS NEVER ACTUALLY COME TO FRUITION BECAUSE OF THE GOVERNOR'S VETO. >> THIS IS NEW, YOU'RE RIGHT BUT
THE PRINCIPLE IS THE SAME. THE PRINCIPLE HAS TO BE THAT ONCE THE LEGISLATURE, WHICH IS THE DESIGNATED AND, THERE HAS TO
BE SOMEBODY WHO RESOLVES THE IMPASSE. IT CAN'T GO BACK TO THE PARTY WHO SAID NO IN THE FIRST PLACE.
YOU CAN READ IT. >> BUT LEGISLATURE RESOLVED THE IMPASSE. >> THEY DID AND APPROPRIATED THE
MONEY. >> THEY HAVE A SEPARATE PROVISION, IF MONEY IS NOT THERE IT IS RESOLVED THE OTHER WAY,
CORRECT. >> YES, BUT IT WAS RESOLVED. EITHER THE GOVERNOR IS AN INTERLOPER AND OUT OF THIS
PROCESS-- TRY ANOTHER WAY. WHAT IF THE LEGISLATURE DESIGNATED THE COURTS AS THE RESOLUTION OF IMPASSE?
>> BUT THE LEGISLATURE CAN NOT APPROPRIATE FUNDS EXCEPT BY PASSING A LAW. THAT'S THE WAY THE LEGISLATURE
ACTS. AGAIN THAT IS PART OF THE PROCESS OF OUR GOVERNMENT THAT IS FUNDAMENTAL.
AND THE GOVERNOR IS PART OF THAT PROCESS. >> AND THE PEOPLE HAVE PUT LIMITATIONS ON THAT IN THE
DECLARATION OF RIGHTS ABOUT ALL SORTS OF THINGS. THIS PARTICULAR ONE IS RIGHT THERE WITH RIGHT OF ASSEMBLY AND
FREEDOM OF RELIGION. >> THERE IS A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE RIGHT TO COLLECTIVELY BARGAIN THAT IS IN THE
DECLARATION OF RIGHTS AND THE RIGHT TO RECEIVE HOW MUCH MONEY OF PUBLIC FUNDS YOU'RE GOING TO GET PURSUANT TO THAT THING,
PURSUANT TO THE COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENT. THOSE ARE TWO SEPARATE THINGS. THE RIGHT TO COLLECTIVELY
BARGAIN IS PROTECTED, DECLARATION OF RIGHTS, BUT IT DOESN'T GUARANTY WITHOUT LIMITATION HOW MUCH MONEY YOU
GET AND THAT IS SUBJECT TO THE APPROPRIATION PROCESS AND GOVERNOR'S POWERS OVER THAT PROCESS LIKE ALL OTHER PUBLIC
FUNDS, IS IT NOT? >> THIS CASE IS NOT ABOUT THE AMOUNT. IT WAS NEVER ABOUT THE AMOUNT.
THIS CASE IS ABOUT ONE OF TWO THINGS THE GOVERNOR CAN NOT USE THE POWER OF BUDGET TO VIOLATE THE FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF THE
PEOPLE IN ANY WAY? OR AT LEAST WITH REGARD TO COLLECTIVE BARGAINING THE STRICT SCRUTINY RULE APPLIES, AND HE
WOULD HAVE TO DEMONSTRATE A COMPELLING STATE INTEREST AND HE DIDN'T DO THAT. >> ARE WE NOT TALKING ABOUT
MONEY? NO. THEY HAD ALREADY APPROPRIATED MONEY.
HE SAID NO. HE CAN ONLY SAY NO IF HE CAN DEMONSTRATE THERE WAS COMPELLING STATE INTEREST TO DO SO AND
THERE ISN'T. THEY WERE NEVER GIVEN THAT. >> FINISH YOUR THOUGHT ABOUT RESOLVING AN IMPASSE.
THEY COULD HAVE USED A JUDICIAL MECHANISM. EXPLAIN THAT. >> WELL, WOULDN'T HAVE
SEPARATION OF POWERS. CERTAINLY THE LEGISLATURE WOULD HAVE TO HONOR THE DECISIONS OF THE COURT.
THAT IS WHY WE'RE HERE. YOU KNOW, THERE IS NO SEPARATION OF POWERS. THE STATE HASN'T ADJUDICATED ITS
RIGHTS ALL THE TIME BY THE COURTS. THERE IS NOTHING NEW ABOUT THAT. THE QUESTION WHETHER IT IS
APPROPRIATE TO HAVE A-- THEY'RE NOT THE EMPLOYER. >> BUT EVEN IF THE COURT, OR THE PERSON WHO, OR ENTITY THAT WAS
TO RESOLVE THE IMPASSE AND THE COURT CAME UP WITH SOME AMOUNT AND LEGISLATURE HAD TO APPROPRIATE THE MONEY, WHAT
WOULD STOP THE GOVERNOR, EVEN UNDER THOSE CIRCUMSTANCES FROM VETOING? >> WELL, OF COURSE THAT IS A
DIFFERENT PROCESS AND I THINK YOU MAY RECOGNIZE WHERE IT COMES TO PLAY BECAUSE IF A COURT, CIRCUIT JUDGE DECIDED WHO IS
GIVEN POWER TO DO RESOLUTION OF THE IMPASSE AND HE SIDED IN FAVOR OF THE UNION, THAT COULD GO TO A WRIT OF EXECUTION AND
THE SHERIFF WOULD TAKE THE BANK ACCOUNT OF THE STATE TO SATISFY IT. >> YOU CAN'T EXECUTE AGAINST THE
STATE? THAT IS NOT THE REMEDY. THE POINT, IF WE HAD A JUDGMENT OF SOME KIND, THE QUESTION WOULD
BE, WHAT'S THE PROCESS TO FLOW UP TO, UP THE CHAIN. SO FIRST IT WOULD GO THROUGH THE LEGISLATIVE PROCESS AND THEN,
LET'S ASSUME THAT THE LEGISLATURE APPROVES PAYMENT OF A JUDGMENT OF SOME KIND AND THEN IT GOES TO, STILL GOES TO THE
GOVERNOR. THAT IS THE PROBLEM. EVERYTHING THE LEGISLATURE DOES FLOWS UP TO THE GOVERNOR.
THAT'S THE FUNDAMENTAL FIGHT THAT, OR IT IS NOT A FIGHT. IT IS A FUNDAMENTAL PROBLEM TO DEAL WITH IN THIS AREA.
>> WE DO NOT HAVE A GUBERNATORIAL FORM OF GOVERNMENT. WE HAVE A CONSTITUTIONAL FORM OF
GOVERNMENT. >> WELL THAT'S TRUE, BUT THE CONSTITUTION GIVES WHOEVER IS SITTING IN THAT CHAIR THE POWER
TO EITHER APPROVE OR VETO. >> YEAH, BUT THIS AMENDMENT THAT GAVE THE PEOPLE RIGHTS WAS LATER IN TIME.
SO WE CERTAINLY KNOW THAT THE PEOPLE WHEN THEY VOTED FOR THIS, AND ROBERTS SAID THE PEOPLE HAVE SPOKEN.
>> LET ME HAVE YOU ADDRESS A PRACTICAL QUESTION I HAVE. WHAT AGENCY OR AGENCIES WERE THE RECIPIENT OF THE FUNDS IN THE
APPROPRIATION THAT GOT VETOED? >> WELL THE, THAT'S KIND OF COMPLICATED BECAUSE THE STATE FIREFIGHTERS ACTUALLY WORK FOR A
NUMBER OF DIFFERENT AGENCIES. SOME OF WHICH ARE INDEPENDENT OF THE GOVERNOR. THAT IS TO SAY, THERE IS THE
TEACHERS AT THE STATE FIRE COLLEGE. THEY WORK FOR THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER.
THERE IS THE FORESTRY FIREFIGHTERS WHO FIGHT FOREST FIRES. THEY WORK FOR THE COMMISSIONER
OF AGRICULTURE. BOTH OF THOSE PEOPLE ARE INDEPENDENT CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS IN THEIR OWN RIGHT AND
DON'T ANSWER TO THE GOVERNOR. SO THERE ARE-- >> THEY'RE STILL FUNDED THROUGH THE SAME APPROPRIATION BILL,
RIGHT? >> RIGHT. >> AS A PRACTICAL MATTER, ISN'T IT CORRECT THAT THE LEGISLATURE
CAN PRACTICALLY MAKE VETO-PROOF APPROPRIATION BECAUSE OF THE, THERE IS THE, THE GOVERNOR CAN VETO ANY SPECIFIC APPROPRIATION
BUT CAN NOT VETO A PROVISO WITHOUT A VETOING THE APPROPRIATION CONNECTED WITH IT, CORRECT?
>> YES BUT FUNDAMENTAL-- >> SO THE LEGISLATURE COULD HAVE PUT A PROVISO LANGUAGE ATTACHED WITH THE SALARY BUDGET FOR THE
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND WHATEVER OTHER DEPARTMENTS ARE INVOLVED AND SAYS THAT OUT OF THIS SPECIFIC APPROPRIATION OF
HOWEVER MANY MILLIONS OR HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS OF DOLLARS THE WHOLE OPERATING BUDGET OR SALARY BUDGET SO MUCH CAN BE
USED FOR THAT AND THAT PUTS THE GOVERNOR OF A POSITION HE IS GOING TO HAVE TO, IF HE WANTS TO VETO THE PROVISO, HE HAS TO VETO
THE ENTIRE BUDGET FOR THE AGENCY. THE LEGISLATURE DOES THAT ALL THE TIME, RIGHT?
>> BUT NOT WITH FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS. THE FACT OF THE MATTER-- >> I GUESS THE THING THAT
DISTURBS ME, IF THE LEGISLATURE CAN ESSENTIALLY PRACTICALLY MAKE AN APPROPRIATION VETO-PROOF BECAUSE OF THAT SECOND PROVISO,
PARTICULARLY IN LIGHT OF THAT I HAVE, IT IS TROUBLING TO ME THAT THE THOUGHT THAT THE LEGISLATURE CAN BY STATUTE MAKE A SPECIFIC
APPROPRIATION VETO-PROOF IN CONTRAVENTION OF THE FIRST PART OF THE VETO LANGUAGE THAT SAYS THE GOVERNOR MAY VETO ANY
SPECIFIC APPROPRIATION. I MEAN THEY-- THEY CHOSE TO DO THIS IN A WAY THAT THE CONSTITUTION ALLOWS THE POSITIVE
TO VETO IT. THAT IS THEIR PREROGATIVE. THEY RESOLVED THE IMPASSE IN THAT MANNER.
THEY COULD HAVE RESOLVED THE IMPASSE IN A MANNER THAT MADE IT PRACTICALLY IMPOSSIBLE FOR THE GOVERNOR TO VETO.
JUST-- >> FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS ARE SUPPOSED TO BE FREE AND AVAILABLE.
THEY ARE NOT SUBJECT TO INTRICACIES OF THE LEGISLATURE. >> YOU'RE NOT CONTENDING THAT, THAT YOU HAVE FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT
TO THE $2,000, RIGHT? I MEAN, THERE IS NO FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT FOR THE, THAT REQUIRED THAT THE LEGISLATURE PROVIDE
THAT AMOUNT OF MONEY. >> THAT IS NOT THE ISSUE HERE. >> I UNDERSTAND THAT, BUT, THAT YOU'RE SAYING THAT BUT IT IS THE
ISSUE. THAT'S WHAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT. IT IS ALL ABOUT WHETHER THAT MONEY IS GOING TO BE SPENT BY
THE STATE OR NOT AND I'M HAVING TROUBLE FOLLOWING THE LINE OF ARGUMENT, IT'S A FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT BUT IT IS NOT A
FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT SO THE LEGISLATURE HAD TO DO IT, RIGHT? >> SOMEBODY HAS TO DO IT. EITHER THE JUDICIAL BRANCH,
ARBITRATION OR THE LEGISLATIVE BRANCH. >> FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT TO GET THAT AMOUNT OF MONEY?
>> WHAT IS A FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT TO HAVE THE IMPASSE RESOLVED. >> I UNDERSTAND THAT. >> THEY COULD RESOLVE IT BY
1999, WAVER IT IS. >> OR BY ZERO, RIGHT? >> YES THEY COULD HAVE DONE IT IN FAVOR OF THE GOVERNOR BUT
THEY DIDN'T. THAT'S THE POINT. THEY APPROPRIATED THE MONEY. THE GOVERNOR VIOLATED THE
FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT OF THE PARTIES TO BARGAIN COLLECTIVELY. >> IF THEY CAN DO IT IN FAVOR OF THE GOVERNMENT, THEY HAVE AT
LEAST THREE OPTIONS. THEY CAN SAY, NO, YOU DON'T GET IT. YES, YOU GET IT I WILL DO IT IN
A WAY PRACTICALLY IMPOSSIBLE FOR THE GOVERNOR TO VETO, OR YES YOU CAN DO IT, AND DO IT IN A WAY THE GOVERNOR ALLOWS IT TO
VETO. IF YOU DON'T HAVE A FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT TO THE MONEY, WHY DO YOU HAVE A FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT TO
DICTATE THE WAY THE LEGISLATURE DOES IT IN A MANNER THAT CONFLICTS WITH THE CONSTITUTION? >> FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS ARE
SUPPOSED TO BE FREELY AVAILABLE. THEY'RE NOT SUPPOSED TO BE THE SUBJECT OF INTRICACIES OF THE GOVERNMENT MAKING A KIND OF
OBSTACLE FOR IT SO YOU DON'T GET THE TO GET THE PEOPLE SAID YOU'RE ENTITLED TO. >> THERE IS THE FOLLOW-UP STEP
TO THAT. THAT THE LEGISLATURE KNEW THAT IF A GOVERNOR IS GOING TO VETO A FUNDING BILL, THAT THEY CAN
OVERRIDE THAT. >> SAME ARGUMENT. >> THEY CAN OVERRIDE THAT WITH A, WITH A VOTE.
SO THAT WHY WOULD THAT NOT, IF I'M SITTING HERE TOTALLY LOOKING AT THIS WHOLE PICTURE, THAT WOULD BE THE FALL-BACK POSITION.
OKAY SO THE GOVERNOR DON'T GO ALONG, WE'LL OVERRIDE THE VETO? WHY COULD THAT NOT WORK? >> FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS, YOU SAID
IT'S A FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT, SUBJECT TO STRICT SCRUTINY. NOW IT IS NO LONGER SUBJECT TO STRICT SCRUTINY?
IT SHOULD BE. THE POINT IF IT'S A FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT YOU CAN'T HAVE INTRICACIES LIKE OVERRIDING A VETO OR JUST
TRASH. IT ISN'T FUNDAMENTAL AT ALL. THE FACT OF THE MATTER I KNOW THIS IS A LITTLE DIFFERENT BUT
IT IS JUST THE WORKERS, BUT THE FACT OF THE MATTER THE PEOPLE WANTED THIS, AND IT IS THEIR GOVERNMENT.
REMEMBER WHAT ABRAHAM LINCOLN SAID-- >> THAT IS NOT IN DISPUTE HERE. >> OKAY.
>> THIS COURT RECOGNIZES THAT, THE QUESTION IS, WHAT DOES THAT MEAN? THAT JUST ELIMINATE ANY
DISCUSSION OF THE PROCESS BY WHICH THOSE, THAT FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT IS IMPLEMENTED? AND PART OF THE BARGAINING
PROCESS DOESN'T INCLUDE PARTICULAR AMOUNT BUT IT DOES I THINK, FAIR TO SAY HAVE A PROCESS THAT'S FAIR.
SO THAT YOU DON'T HAVE THE ACTUAL OPPONENTS TO THE PROCESS HAVING A SAY WHAT HAPPENS. >> THE ARGUMENT IS THE SAME.
I OFFERED THAT AS AN ALTERNATIVE, WHICH IS A REASONABLE APPROACH. AND IS THE ONE YOU ALWAYS USED
FOR EVERYTHING. AND THAT IS, THE GOVERNOR CAN PARTICIPATE IN THIS PROCESS AS YOU'RE SUGGESTING BUT IF HE IS
GOING TO GO AGAINST THE LEGISLATURE'S RESOLUTION OF THE IMPASSE, THEN HE IS GOING TO HAVE TO DEMONSTRATE THE STRICT
SCRUTINY TEST, A COMPELLING STATE REASON FOR DOING SO. THAT IS THE RULE OF LAW. IT IS ORDINARY WAY OF
OPERATING-- >> COUNSEL, YOU HAVE USED ALL YOUR TIME. PLUS A LITTLE MORE.
BUT I WILL AFFORD YOU TWO MINUTES FOR REBUTTAL. >> GOOD MORNING MR. CHIEF JUSTICE AND MAY IT PLEASE THE
COURT IF I MAY I WOULD LIKE TO START OUT BY ADDRESSING WHAT WE THINK IS THE SINGLE MOST IMPORTANT ISSUE THAT'S PRESENTED
IN THIS CASE AND THAT IS WHETHER THE LEGISLATURE SHOULD BE UNDERSTOOD TO HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO STATUTORILY MODIFY OR REPEAL
OR LIMIT THE GOVERNOR'S CONSTITUTIONALLY-AS SIGNED ROLE IN THE APPROPRIATION PROCESS? WE THINK THE ANSWER TO THAT
QUESTION UNDER THE PLAIN TEXT OF ARTICLE III, SECTION 8, AND THIS COURT'S PRECEDENCE CONSTRUING THAT PROVISION HAS TO BE NO.
THAT CONCLUSION STANDING ALONE PROVIDE SUFFICIENT BASIS FOR DISPOSING OF THIS CASE. >> I GUESS WHAT I'M STRUGGLING
WITH THERE, AND I UNDERSTAND YOUR ARGUMENT BUT IT GOES BACK TO THE STATUTE ITSELF. WOULD WE BE SAYING, WHEN IT
COMES TO MONEY THAT IT'S ESSENTIALLY WHATEVER IS DECIDED WITHIN THE SCOPE OF THAT COLLECTIVE BARGAINING STATUTE?
THAT THE GOVERNOR CAN VETO THAT FOR ANY REASON HE WANTS? I JUST WOULD LIKE YOU TO ADDRESS JUDGE THOMAS', WAS IT A DISSENT
OR, TO SAY, WELL, AT LEAST THOUGH, IF THERE IS A COMPELLING INTEREST TO OVERRIDE IT, THAT THAT THEN HARMONIZES THE RIGHT
TO COLLECTIVE BARGAIN, MEANINGFULLY COLLECTIVE BARGAINING WITH THE RIGHT TO VETO?
BECAUSE IT DOESN'T SEEM TO ME THE OVERRIDE, YOU KNOW, AFTER THE LEGISLATURE IS OUT OF SESSION, THE VETO OCCURS.
YOU'RE GOING TO BRING BACK THE ENTIRE LEGISLATURE FOR A SPECIAL SESSION TO OVERRIDE THAT ONE ITEM.
THAT IS ALMOST, WOULD BE NOTHING AT ALL. SO WHAT ABOUT, WHY ISN'T THAT AN APPROPRIATE WAY TO RESOLVE THE
CONFLICT BETWEEN RIGHT TO COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AND RIGHT TO VETO? >> FOR A COUPLE OF REASONS, YOUR
HONOR. FIRST, THIS COURT HAS NEVER HELD THAT THE GOVERNOR'S EXERCISE OF HIS VETO POWER IS SUBJECT TO
STRICT SCRUTINY, BASED ON THE REASON SUPPORTING THE EXERCISE OF THAT POWER. SO THIS IS AN ENTIRELY NOVEL
CONSTITUTIONAL INNOVATION THAT OUR FRIENDS ON THE OTHER SIDE ARE ASKING THIS COURT TO EMBRACE FOR THE VERY FIRST TIME IN THE
HISTORY OF THIS STATE. AND THAT'S A DANGEROUS ROAD TO GO DOWN. WE WOULD EMPHASIZE IN RESPONSE
TO YOUR HONOR'S QUESTION THE PRACTICAL AND DOCTRINAL IMPLICATIONS OF ACCEPTING PETITIONER'S NOVEL
CONSTITUTIONAL THEORY. FIT IS TRUE THAT THE LEGISLATURE WHEN IT IS ENFORCING OR IMPLEMENTING ARTICLE 1 SECTION 6
CAN DO AWAY WITH THE PRESENTMENT REQUIREMENT OF OUR ARTICLE III, SECTION 8, WHAT ELSE CAN IT DO AWAY WITH?
FOR EXAMPLE, WHY CAN'T THE LEGISLATURE DO AWAY WITH THE BICAMERAL REQUIREMENT SET OUT IN SECTION 8?
>> ARE YOU SAYING THE STATUTE ITSELF THAT THE LEGISLATURE PASSED UNCONSTITUTIONAL? >> IT IS NOT BECAUSE WE BELIEVE
THAT THE STATUTE NEED NOT AND SHOULD NOT BE CONSTRUED TO LIMIT THE BICAMERALISM OR PRESENTMENT REQUIREMENT THAT IS SET OUT IN
ARTICLE III SECTION 8. THAT IS NOT JUST OUR VIEW, JUSTICE PARIENTE. THIS COURT IN FLORIDA VERSUS--
>> I'M STILL, MAYBE, YOU GOT A PROCEDURE FOR COLLECTIVE BARGAINING. BOTH PARTIES COME.
THEY COME TO AN IMPASSE. THEN THE STATUTE IS, REQUIRES THAT THE LEGISLATURE MAKE THAT DECISION AND APPROPRIATE,
CORRECT? >> YES. >> SO THE ISSUE OF HOW IT GETS RESOLVED, IF IT HAS, IF THE
GOVERNOR HAS PLENARY AUTHORITY TO VETO THAT APPROPRIATION, THEN DOESN'T IT UNDERMINE THE ENTIRE STATUTORY SCHEME?
AGAIN, YOU MAY, IT'S, I DON'T KNOW. I'M JUST, I DON'T THINK IT IS, LIKE WHAT YOU JUST SAID, COULD
THEY AMEND, I MEAN YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT A BICAMERAL LEGISLATURE. ISN'T THAT IN THE CONSTITUTION?
>> IT IS. >> SO I DON'T REALLY THINK-- >> SO IS THE PRESENTMENT REQUIREMENT IN ARTICLE III,
SECTION 8. IN OTHER WORDS THERE IS A SINGLE EXCLUSIVE, AND MANDATORY PROCEDURE BY WHICH A BILL CAN
BECOME LAW IN THIS STATE AND THAT IS SET OUT IN THE EXPRESS TERMS OF OUR ARTICLE III, SECTION 8.
THE LEGISLATURE HAS NO MORE AUTHORITY WHEN IT IS IMPLEMENTING ARTICLE I, SECTION 6 TO DO AWAY WITH THE
PRESENTMENT REQUIREMENT THAN IT DOES TO DO AWAY WITH ANY OTHER GENERALLY APPLICABLE CONSTITUTIONAL REQUIREMENT.
>> MAKE SURE I UNDERSTAND, AS YOUR DISTINGUISHED OPPOSITION SUGGESTS, THAT YOU WOULD INTERPRET OUR CONSTITUTIONAL
SCHEME SO THAT THE EXECUTIVE HAS ABSOLUTE DICTATORIAL POWER WITH REGARD TO REVIEWING EVERY ITEM THAT DEALS WITH FINANCES EITHER
TO ACCEPT IT, OR VETO IT? IT HAS NO, WHETHER THAT DEALS WITH ELECTIONS, WHETHER THAT DEALS WITH OTHER FORMS OF WHAT
WE CONSIDER OUR AMERICAN WAY OF GOVERNMENT, AND THERE IS NO EXCEPTION TO THAT? IS THAT THE PREMISE THAT YOU'RE
FOLLOWING? >> SO OUR PREMISE IS THAT THIS COURT SHOULD FOLLOW THE PRECEDENT THAT IT IS ARTICULATED
IN BROWN VERSUS FIRESTONE, WHICH IS NOT THAT THE GOVERNOR HAS ABSOLUTE DICTATORIAL POWER, FAR FROM IT.
THIS COURT IN THE BROWN CASE STRESSED THAT THE VETO POWER HAS TO BE EXERCISED IN CONFORMITY SET OUT IN ARTICLE III, SECTION
8, INCLUDING THE REQUIREMENT WHICH JUSTICE LAWSON REFERRED IF THE GOVERNOR VETOES A SPECIFIC PROVISO HAVING TO DO WITH AN
APPROPRIATION, HE HAS TO VETO THAT WHOLE APPROPRIATION. THAT FOR EXACTLY THE REASON JUSTICE LAWSON STRESSED PROVIDES
A VERY SIGNIFICANT CHECK ON THE GOVERNOR'S POWER. >> BUT OTHER THAN THAT, IF IT IS NOT CONTAINED, DON'T FOLLOW
THROUGH WITH THE PROVISO, PLAYING THAT GAME, THAT THE GOVERNOR, WHOEVER IT IS, THIS ONE OR THE NEXT ONE OR ANY OF
THEM, WOULD HAVE THE POWER UNDER CIRCUMSTANCES SUCH AS THIS TO TAKE AN ACTION THROUGH A VETO THAT, THAT, LET'S ASSUME, LET'S
ASSUME, CLEARLY VIOLATES ANOTHER PROVISION OF OUR CONSTITUTIONAL WE CONSIDER TO BE THE RIGHTS? IS THAT WHERE WE ARE?
>> NO. BECAUSE WE'RE ABSOLUTELY NOT ASSERTING THE AUTHORITY OF THE GOVERNOR TO VIOLATE ANY OTHER
GENERALLY APPLICABLE CONSTITUTIONAL PROVISION. WHAT WE'RE ASKING FOR THIS COURT TO FOLLOW THE PRONOUNCEMENT THAT
IT ARTICULATED IN STATE VERSUS FLORIDA POLICE BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION WHERE THIS COURT STRESSED THAT THE COLLECTIVE
BARGAINING RIGHT THAT IS CREATED BY ARTICLE I, SECTION 6 DOES NOT CHANGE OR INVADE OTHER GENERALLY APPLICABLE CONSTITUTIONAL
REQUIREMENTS INCLUDING, AND THIS IS VERY IMPORTANT, THE CONSTITUTIONAL PRINCIPLE OF THE SEPARATION OF POWERS WHICH IS
EMBODIED IN ARTICLE II, SECTION 3. NOT TO STRESS THE SEPARATION POWERS.
>> THAT VIEW IS ADOPTED, THEN WHY IS NOT THE STATUTORY SCHEME UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND WE CRY TO THE LEGISLATURE TO FIND A
DIFFERENT, DIFFERENT PROGRAM OR PLAN THAT'S CONSISTENT WITH THE RIGHT OF FLORIDA CITIZENS TO FREELY BARGAIN?
>> YOU COULD GO DOWN THAT ROAD, YOUR HONOR, AND WE WOULD RESPECTFULLY SUGGEST TO THE COURT THAT YOU NEED NOT, IN OUR
VIEW SHOULD NOT CONSTRUE CHAPTER 447 OF FLORIDA STATUTES TO CONFLICT WITH THE BUY BICAMERALISM AND PRESENTMENT
REQUIREMENT SET OUT IN SECTION 8. WHY? BECAUSE THE FLORIDA POLICE
BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION. THE COURT CAN SAY THE RIGHT TO ENGAGE IN COLLECTIVE BARGAINING UNDERSTOOD TO BE SUBJECT TO THE
APPROPRIATION POWER AND THE APPROPRIATION POWER IS SET OUT IN ARTICLE II, SECTION 8. >> THAT DIDN'T THROW INTO
CONFLICT THE VETO POWER OF THE GOVERNMENT THOUGH, DID IT? >> WELL, WHAT THE COURT SAID THE RIGHT TO COLLECTIVELY BARGAIN IS
GENERALLY SUBJECT TO THE APPROPRIATION POWER. >> TRUE. >> THE COURT EXCITED, FOR
EXAMPLE A SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL CASE THAT EXPRESSLY STATED THAT THE APPROPRIATION POWER OF COURSE INCLUDES ALL
GOVERNMENTAL OFFICERS WHO PLAY A CONSTITUTIONALLY ASSIGNED ROLE IN THE APPROPRIATION PROCESS AND THAT OF COURSE INCLUDES THE
GOVERNOR. >> OKAY, THAT HAS BEEN ANSWERED THEN, IS YOUR VIEW? >> SO OUR VIEW THE STATUTE NEED
NOT BE CONSTRUED TO CONFLICT WITH THE CONSTITUTION BUT IF YOU UNDERSTOOD THE STATUTE TO TRY TO ASSERT A POWER ON THE PART OF
THE LEGISLATURE TO DO AWAY WITH THE PRESENTMENT REQUIREMENT, THEN WE CERTAINLY WOULD ARGUE AND WE DO IN OUR BRIEF THAT THE
STATUTE SO CONSTRUED WOULD NOT BE CONSTITUTIONAL, NOT JUST IN CONTRAVENTION OF ARTICLE II, SECTION 8, BUT CON HAVE TENSION
OF SEPARATION OF POWERS PRINCIPLE IN ARTICLE II. HERE IS THE POINT I WOULD STRESS, JUSTICE LEWIS, YOU RAISE
IMPORTANT CONCERNS. AS IN CASE IN LAW AND LIFE THERE IS NO PERFECT SEVEN SOLUTION. AND IN SOME WAYS YOU'RE
LOOKING-- >> YOU ALL COME HERE TO FIND THAT PERFECT SOLUTION. >> USUALLY LEAVE DISAPPOINTED.
>> EVERYONE. >> WELL, WE'D LIKE TO SUGGEST THAT THE LEAST BAD ANSWER HERE IS TO CONSTRUE THE STATUTE IN
SUCH A WAY IT CONFORMS WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF ARTICLE III, SECTION 8. WHY IS THAT?
THE PRACTICAL ALTERNATIVE IS TO GIVE THE LEGISLATURE THE POWER TO DO AWAY WITH BY STATUTE, TO DO AWAY WITH WHAT THIS COURT IN
BROWN VERSUS FIRESTONE CHARACTERIZED AS THE PRIMARY CHECK ON WHAT WOULD OTHERWISE BE UNFETTERED LEGISLATIVE POWER
WITH RESPECT TO THE APPROPRIATION PROCESS. THAT WOULD BE A PRETTY BIG DEAL. THAT HAS NEVER BEEN DONE BEFORE
IN THE HISTORY OF THIS STATE. WE WOULD SUGGEST IF THERE IS ANY WAY TO AVOID THAT OUTCOME, AND THERE IS HERE, THAT THE COURT
SHOULD A VEIL ITSELF OF THAT OPPORTUNITY. >> YOU KNOW, I GUESS, THIS GOES BACK TO SOMETHING THAT WAS SAID
RIGHT AT THE BEGINNING OF THE ARGUMENT BUT IT SEEMS TO ME IN THIS WHOLE COLLECTIVE BARGAINING SITUATION HOW DO WE GET AROUND
THE FACT THAT THE GOVERNOR IS A PARTICIPANT IN THIS COLLECTIVE BARGAINING, YOU GET AN IMPASSE, AND SO WHAT YOU'RE SAYING IS THE
GOVERNOR HAS THE LAST SAY IN THIS WHOLE PROCESS BECAUSE THE GOVERNOR GETS TO VETO EVEN THOUGH YOU GOT A PROCESS WHERE
THE IMPASSE GOES TO SUPPOSEDLY A NEUTRAL BODY, LOOKS AT THE GOVERNOR'S POINT OF VIEW, LOOKS AT THE OTHER PARTICIPANTS POINT
OF VIEW, COMES TO A COMPROMISE, OR A SOLUTION, AND THEN THE GOVERNOR STILL GETS TO SAY NO? SO HOW DO WE GET AROUND THAT?
IS THERE SOME WAY TO RESOLVE THAT? >> IT'S A VERY IMPORTANT QUESTION, YOUR HONOR.
AND I WOULD ANSWER IT IN A COUPLE OF WAYS. THE FIRST IS TO SAY THAT IT IS NOT ALL TOGETHER UNCOMMON IN OUR
CONSTITUTIONAL SYSTEM FOR ONE BRANCH OF GOVERNMENT TO HAVE THE POWER TO RESOLVE DISPUTES THAT TOUCH ON ITS OWN POWER.
SO FOR EXAMPLE, THE LEGISLATURE CAN APPROPRIATE FUNDS THAT AFFECT AND GO TO LEGISLATIVE OPERATIONS.
THIS COURT ON QUITE FREQUENT BASIS DECIDES CASES THAT SPEAK TO THE DISTRIBUTION OF POWER BETWEEN THE JUDICIAL BRANCH AND
OTHER BRANCHES OF GOVERNMENT. THERE IS NOTHING IMPROPER ABOUT THAT, EVEN THOUGH YOU COULD CONCEPTUALIZE IT AS SPECIES OF
SELF-INTEREST. ANOTHER WAY OF SAYING THIS BRANCH UNDER OUR CONSTITUTION UNDER THE CONSTITUTION HAS TO
PERFORM THEIR CONSTITUTIONALLY ASSIGNED ROLE. >> I'M SORT OF STUCK ON THE ARGUMENT, MAYBE YOU ALREADY
ANSWERED IT THE BEST THAT IS AVAILABLE, WE'RE DEALING WITH A FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT TO COLLECTIVELY BARGAIN.
AND SO, IT IS NOT THE SAME AS-- WE'RE NOT TALKING ABOUT THE SEPARATION OF POWERS ISSUE HERE. AND YOU KNOW, YOU'RE SAYING, YOU
WOULD ADMIT THERE IS A WAY TO OVERRIDE THE VETO BY GOING TO A SPECIAL SESSION, AND THAT'S THE ANSWER TO IT.
THAT IS HOW THE COLLECTIVE BARGAINING RIGHT WOULD GET EFFECTUATED. AGAIN FOR THE REASONS I POINTED
OUT THAT'S REALLY MEANINGLESS. SO I'M STILL, I GUESS I'M STRUGGLING WITH THE WHY THE SOLUTION OF, THAT IF THE
GOVERNOR IS GOING TO VETO THIS PARTICULAR APPROPRIATION HE HAS TO SHOW MORE THAN, OVER, EVERYONE SHOULD HAVE GOTTEN THE
MONEY. HE WANTED ALL STATE EMPLOYEES TO GET THE MONEY OR NO ONE GETS IT. BUT, THAT'S NOT WHAT THIS CASE
WAS ABOUT. SO WHY WOULDN'T THERE BE, LISTEN WE'RE IN A FINANCIAL CRISIS. I'M VETOING ALL THESE OTHER,
SOMETHING ELSE OTHER THAN, I WANT EVERYONE TO GET A PAY RAISE? I MEAN MA WOULD BE, WHY WOULD
THAT WHY WOULD THAT NULLIFY IN THIS PARTICULAR AREA THE VETO, THE AUTHORITY OF THE GOVERNOR TO VETO?
>> SO, I THINK THE ANSWER TO YOUR HONOR'S QUESTION IS, THAT ARTICLE III SECTION EIGHT. I THINK THE ANSWER TO YOUR
HONOR'S QUESTION IS ARTICLE 3 SECTION 8 DOESN'T SAY THE LEGISLATURE CAN DO AWAY WITH THE PRESENTMENT REQUIREMENT.
>> ALL WE ARE DOING IS GOING BACK TO THE SAME ISSUE WHICH YOU ARE SAYING THE TO SEND CANNOT BE -- CANNOT COMPORT WITH THE
PRESENTMENT REQUIREMENT. I AM SAYING I DON'T KNOW WHY IF IT IS STILL REQUIRING THE GOVERNOR TO DEMONSTRATE
SOMETHING. I TOLD YOU I DON'T WANT TO COLLECTIVELY BARGAIN, DIDN'T AGREE WITH THAT.
THE LEGISLATURE WENT THROUGH IT, THEY APPROPRIATED BUT I CAN SAY NO. >> JUST TO STRESS A PRACTICAL
REALITY WE DISAGREE WITH THE SUGGESTION THERE IS NOT A MEANINGFUL RIGHT TO ENGAGE IN COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AS
EVIDENCED BY THE FACT THE FIREFIGHTERS ASKED FOR $1500 PER PERSON PAY RAISE AND THEY GOT A $2000 --
>> THEY GOT NOTHING. >> IN 2016. SOME OF THEIR MEMBERS GOT AN ADDITIONAL $2500 PER PERSON
PAY RAISE IN 2018. BASED ON PUBLIC ENACTMENTS THEY CITED ON PAGE 5 OF OUR ANSWER BRIEF WITH CITATION TO PUBLIC
LAWS. THE MORE FUNDAMENTAL ANSWER TO YOUR HONOR'S QUESTION ABOUT THE CONFLICT OF INTEREST.
WHAT IS THE GREATER CONFLICT OF INTEREST? THE FACT THAT THE GOVERNOR LIKE MANY CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICES
SOMETIMES WEARS TWO HATS AND HAS TO PLAY A ROLE IN CONSTITUTIONALLY ASSIGNED ROLE IN THE APPROPRIATION PROCESS
EVEN THOUGH HE CAN BE A PUBLIC EMPLOYER WITHIN THE MEANING OF CHAPTER 447 OR IS THE GREATER CONFLICT OF INTEREST GIVING THE
LEGISLATURE THE AUTHORITY TO MODIFY OR REPEAL WHAT IS THE PRIMARY CHALLENGE. >> IT WOULD SEEM THAT WOULD
VINDICATE THAT SOLUTION, WOULD VINDICATE BOTH RIGHTS. >> SUBJECTING THE VETO TO THE STATE INTEREST TEST.
THE ANSWER TO THAT IS A LOT OF PRACTICAL REASONS WHY YOU MIGHT NOT GO DOWN THAT ROAD. THE RIGHT TO COLLECTIVE
BARGAINING IS NOT THE ONLY RIGHT THAT IS IMPLICATED, A LOT OF CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS AS A PRACTICAL MATTER REQUIRE FUNDING
TO BE MEANINGFULLY PROTECTED. LET ME GIVE YOU A COUPLE EXAMPLES, THERE IS THE RIGHT OF ALL CHILDREN UNDER THE STATE
CONSTITUTION TO HAVE ADEQUATE EDUCATION UNDER ARTICLE 9 SECTION 1. THERE IS THE RIGHT OF CRIMINAL
DEFENDANTS TO HAVE SPEEDY AND IMPARTIAL TRIALS UNDER ARTICLE 1. AND APPROPRIATIONS.
PART OF THE QUESTION THE COURT ONCE TO ANSWER IS DO WE WANT TO GET INTO THE BUSINESS, DOES THE COURT WANT TO GET INTO THE
BUSINESS OF HAVING TO DETERMINE WHETHER A SUFFICIENT JUSTIFICATION SUPPORTS THE EXERCISE OF THE VETO POWER.
THAT WOULD AND MESH THE JUDICIARY OF ALL MANNER OF QUINTESSENTIALLY POLITICAL DISPUTES IN THE SUBMISSION CAN'T
BE RESOLVED ON JUDICIALLY MANAGEABLE STATEMENTS. I CAN GIVE YOU AN EXAMPLE OF ILLUSTRATING THE PROBLEM IN THIS
CASE. >> EVEN WITH THAT DOESN'T IT MAKE A DIFFERENCE, IF THE GOVERNOR IS A PARTY AT THE TABLE
AND MOST OF THESE OTHER SITUATIONS YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT, A PARTY AT THE TABLE. THAT IS WHAT WE HAVE.
>> THE OPERATION OF STATUTE IN 447.03 SUBSECTION 2. ONE MEMBER OF THE COURT SUGGESTED THE LEGISLATURE CAN
COME UP WITH A STATUTORY SCHEME THAT WOULD ADDRESS YOUR HONOR'S CONCERN AT RESPECT. WHATEVER THE SOLUTION IS THE
SOLUTION SHOULD NOT BE HOLDING FOR THE FIRST TIME THE COURTS SHOULD BE SECOND GUESSING THE REASON SUPPORTING GUBERNATORIAL
VETO THAT IS EXERCISED IN FULL COMPLIANCE WITH ALL THE REQUIREMENT OF ARTICLE 3 SECTION 8.
THAT IS NOT JUST OUR VIEW BUT THE VIEW THE COURT ARTICULATED IN BROWN VERSUS FIRESTONE WHEN IT SAID THE GOVERNOR'S VETO
POWER MAY BE EXERCISED FOR ANY REASON WHATSOEVER SPEAKING TO THE RATIONALE FOR THE VETO AS OPPOSED TO THE SUBJECT MATTER.
I WOULD LIKE IF I MAY IN THE TIME I HAVE REMAINING TO ADDRESS SOME ADDITIONAL PRACTICAL CONCERNS THAT MIGHT COME UP IF
WE GO DOWN THIS ROAD OF SUBJECTING THE GOVERNOR'S VETO POWER TO STRIP SCRUTINY AND ILLUSTRATE WITH RESPECT TO THE
PROBLEM IN THIS CASE, JUSTICE PARIENTE. THEY ASKED FOR $1500 PAY RAISE AND THE LEGISLATURE IN THE FIRST
INSTANCE PAST THE $2000 PER PERSON PAY RAISE. COULD THE GOVERNOR REASONABLY HAVE DETERMINED THOSE
FIREFIGHTERS WHO ARE IN THE COLLECTIVE BARGAINING UNIT SHOULD GET THE PAY RAISE THEY ASKED FOR BUT THE ADDITIONAL
FUNDING THAT WAS AVAILABLE SHOULD GO TO VINDICATING CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS INCLUDING RIGHT TO AN ADEQUATE EDUCATION.
ARE THERE JUDICIALLY MANAGEABLE STANDARDS BY WHICH THE COURTS OF THIS STATE COULD SAY UNREASONABLE FOR THE GOVERNOR TO
SAY THAT ADDITIONAL MONEY, PAYING FOR EDUCATION EVEN THOUGH ADDITIONAL MONEY IS ABOVE AND BEYOND WHAT THE UNION REQUESTED.
ONE POINT I WOULD LIKE TO STRESS IS THE LEGISLATIVE PROCESS PLAYED ITSELF OUT, THE GOVERNOR DIDN'T DECIDE THIS CASE, THE
LEGISLATURE DID RESOLVE THE IMPASSE AND NOT BECAUSE THE LEGISLATURE DECLINED TO OVERRUN THE GOVERNOR'S VETO AND THEY
EXPRESSLY PROVIDED OUTSTANDING IMPASSE ISSUES WOULD BE RESOLVED AS MATTER OF LAW BY MAINTAINING THE STATUS QUO AND THAT IS
CHAPTER 2015-223 SECTION 1. THE LEGISLATURE DIDN'T HAVE TO DO THAT BUT IT DID THAT. PETITIONERS MAY NOT THINK THAT
IS GOOD RESOLUTION OF THE COLLECTIVE BARGAINING DISPUTE BUT IS A RESOLUTION INTO THE RESOLUTION THE LEGISLATURE HAD
THE CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY TO ENACT. MY TIME HAS RUN OUT BUT I WILL ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU HAVE.
THANK YOU. >> SHALL NOT BE ABRIDGED HAS NO EXCEPTION, NO EXCEPTION. THERE IS A NEW CONFLICT HERE
BETWEEN THE GOVERNOR'S POWER OR THE BUDGET AND THE FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT. THE SOLUTION FOR THIS CONFLICT
IS THE ONE YOU HAVE ALWAYS USED, THAT IF A FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT IS INVOLVED, YOU HAVE TO ASK THE QUESTION DID THE GOVERNMENT
DEMONSTRATE COMPELLING STATE INTEREST IN THE LEAST INTRUSIVE WAY. YOU HEARD A LOT OF ARGUMENT FROM
THE RESPONDENT BUT NO STATEMENT OF THE COMPELLING STATEMENT, YOU HEARD NO STATEMENT OF WHY THIS WAS THE LEAST INTRUSIVE.
THEY DID NOT MEET THE TEST OF STRICT SCRUTINY AND A TEST OF STRICT SCRUTINY MUST APPLY TO ALL FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OR WE
DON'T HAVE CONSTITUTIONAL GOVERNMENT. THAT IS THE SOLUTION TO THIS CASE AND I THANK YOU FOR YOUR
TIME AND ATTENTION. >> THANK YOU BOTH FOR YOUR ARGUMENTS AND THAT CONCLUDES TODAY'S SESSION OF COURT.
-------------------------------------------
Al Lukino x P17 - Chocotone 2 (prod. Kid Ocean) - Duration: 2:43.
For more infomation >> Al Lukino x P17 - Chocotone 2 (prod. Kid Ocean) - Duration: 2:43. -------------------------------------------
Le Pentagone nie toute implication autour de l'observation d'un mystérieux objet - Duration: 1:52.
For more infomation >> Le Pentagone nie toute implication autour de l'observation d'un mystérieux objet - Duration: 1:52. -------------------------------------------
Honda Civic 1.6i D-TEC ELEGANCE - Connect Navigatie - Duration: 1:15.
For more infomation >> Honda Civic 1.6i D-TEC ELEGANCE - Connect Navigatie - Duration: 1:15. -------------------------------------------
Special Parent Stream! - Duration: 53:59.
For more infomation >> Special Parent Stream! - Duration: 53:59. -------------------------------------------
A Brand New Type of Brain Cell | SciShow News - Duration: 3:52.
[ INTRO ]
You might think that scientists have the human body pretty well figured out.
They've only been studying it for, I don't know, centuries.
But a study published this week in the journal Nature Neuroscience documents a piece of ourselves
that we didn't know existed until now:
a brand-new type of brain cell.
This new neuron isn't found in mice
and the researchers think it may be unique to primates, or even the human species—
and that means it could help us understand what makes us who we are.
Two research groups—one from Hungary, and one from the US—
actually discovered this new neuron type at about the same time using very different techniques.
When they realized this, they teamed up and worked together to publish their results.
Both groups were studying neurons in a part of the brain called the cortex, the brain's
outermost layer,
which is crucial to human consciousness.
Over at the University of Szeged in Hungary, the researchers were taking the more traditional
route
of examining the shape of the neurons in living tissue
and seeing how they respond to electrical pulses.
Different types of neurons look different and respond to currents in different ways.
It's the kind of work that's been done for decades, but usually on animal brains
—because, well, there just isn't a whole lot of access to live human brain tissue.
But the team partnered with doctors to get human samples from patients undergoing brain
surgeries
—which is how they found what they've dubbed the rosehip neuron.
It has a dense bundle of axons—
the nerve fibers that conduct electrical impulses—
clustered around the cell's center.
Hence 'rosehip', because the shape reminded them of a rose after its petals are shed.
Meanwhile, researchers with the Allen Institute for Brain Science in Seattle
were taking a newer approach to examining neurons, called transcriptomics.
That's the study of the genes expressed by cells,
which can tell us a lot about what makes those cells unique.
Using tissue samples from two donated brains,
they performed single-nucleus RNA sequencing,
a type of genetic analysis that let them identify the genes expressed by individual cells.
The technique has only been possible for the past five years or so.
And they found a pattern of gene expression different from all other neurons studied before.
After comparing notes,
the two teams realized the weirdly shaped neurons were the ones with this unique gene
expression pattern.
And together, they were able to hammer out a few more details about them.
Rosehip neurons are part of a larger category of brain cells called inhibitory neurons,
which regulate the activity of other neurons as they transmit information in the brain.
They're sort of like the brain's traffic cops,
controlling the flow of information from one place to another so that everything runs smoothly.
It's not clear exactly what these rosehip neurons control, but their shape may provide
a clue.
They form connections with another type of brain cell called pyramidal neurons.
These are part of the larger category of excitatory neurons,
which basically do the opposite of inhibitory ones: they send signals that make other neurons
more likely to fire.
But rosehip neurons only attach to a very specific part of pyramidal neurons,
which could mean that they regulate information flow in a very specific way.
We don't yet know exactly what they regulate, or how.
But it might be something not found in other animals.
When the team compared their neuron to the varieties of neurons found in mouse brains,
they couldn't find anything similar.
It's hard to say for sure that rosehip neurons are only found in humans or other primates,
because it's not like scientists have checked the brains of every single other animal.
But they definitely don't seem to exist in rodents, at least.
And that means they might play a role in brain processes we don't see in other animals.
If nothing else, rosehip neurons are the latest evidence that as useful as lab mice can be,
they aren't perfect models,
especially when it comes to studying psychiatric and neurological diseases.
Next, the researchers want to look for rosehip neurons in other parts of the brain,
which might give them more insight into what the neurons actually do.
They also want to examine brain tissue samples from people with psychiatric disorders
to see if their rosehip neurons differ in any way from the ones in healthy brains.
Now that they've found this new type of neuron,
they want to learn everything about it—especially if it's part of what makes us human.
Thanks for watching this episode of SciShow News!
If you want to keep up to date on the most important science news, be sure to stop by
every Friday to check out our news episodes.
And if you want to learn more about your brain and how it works, well, we have an entire
channel dedicated to the human mind.
You can head over to YouTube.com/SciShowPsych to learn more and subscribe.
[ OUTRO ]
-------------------------------------------
Ataxia - Vendetta [VIDEO OFICIAL] - Duration: 3:10.
For more infomation >> Ataxia - Vendetta [VIDEO OFICIAL] - Duration: 3:10. -------------------------------------------
ASMR - 👩ROLEPLAY DOCTORA | CRANIAL NERVE - Duration: 16:38.Hello, How are you
Good, I'm glad,
Well well no, right? why else would you not be here
remember me your name please
ok
tell me why the last time you were here ...
ok
you have problems with the ear
What is the left or right?
you do not know...
ok, you get dizzy?
and you think it's from the ears
well let's do a cranial nerve exam as always
But I'll look at you more, the sight and the ear
becouse
we can think that it is from the ear
and maybe it's the view
yes..
let´see
I'm going to start looking at you eyes
let me take out the flashlight
let me see
keep calm
It's okay around here
look up
now please look here
left...
follow the ligth , please
yes...
ok
great
Does it bother you at some point?
no?, ok look up
down
thats is very good
It does not seem to have a bigger problem
we'll see
I'm going to check the ear
just one sec
here
I need you to tell me if this you can ear this
we repeat it
ok
Tell me, listen well on both sides?
you do not have it, ok
Well, I'm going to do a checkup
Deeper
yes...
ok
let me pick a cotton
I'm going to have to clean him up with this
because I do not have anything else, so maybe if he has some injury he will
you have to be brave
im gonna clean around here
Does it sting?
and here?
Does it tickle?
great
Well, let me check with the light
the ears
Now I'm going to give you a product
what is going ..
to .. disinfect everything
perfect
now I'm going to disinfect myself
Do you like the massage in the ears?
I will proceed to the extraction
I'm removing the outer part first
of your ear
you have a small plug in each ear
But it's not a big deal either, it should not give you...
it should not give you... a big problem this
if you say you have vertigo ...
maybe you have to look at your cervicals
Anyway, you accumulate a lot, a lot of wax
ok
the outside is already
now we have to do the extraction
from the inside part ok?
I'm going to make you a liquid to melt
and the wax comes out better
this is going to go inside your ear
do not worry
it's not bad
now, let's go for the other
to see here
very good
See how nothing happened?
let me clean now ...
perfect
let's see if there is any rest
perfect
This is very nice
OK, well, this is already
let's do the sound test again
did you hear it?
yes?
Do you think that by this you listen less?
Well now, you do not have anything at all
let's see I'm going to take a little oil
and I'm going to give you a massage, ok?
and with this we finish
very good
I remove the excess here
perfect
i will make a note
with all the treatment
cleaning
if you still have vertigos
you already have to give a massage ..
Yes yes why...
right now you do not have anything in your ears
you know as always, if you have
some annoyance or something ..
come back
ok ?
thank you
see you
-------------------------------------------
Selon les experts, le gain de poids, les pertes de mémoire et les accidents vasculaires cérébraux - Duration: 6:44.
For more infomation >> Selon les experts, le gain de poids, les pertes de mémoire et les accidents vasculaires cérébraux - Duration: 6:44. -------------------------------------------
2Frères - Coin-Coin - Duration: 1:41. For more infomation >> 2Frères - Coin-Coin - Duration: 1:41. -------------------------------------------
COMO ERA O TERRÍVEL MEGALODONTE ? - Jurassic Clips - Duration: 6:00.
Legends (Jurassic Clips)
hello friends, all right today I'll do the part 2 about the terrible megalodon ti well
let your like sign up to activate the bell of notifications and we go to the glasses
carcharocles or carshalton megalodon also called megalodon ti the shark
giant white was a kind of giant shark that lived between 2013 and
2.6 million years ago in the period miocene in the pacific ocean
the teeth are in many ways similar to those of the current white shark
carcharodon carcharias but with one size that can exceed 17
centimeters in length reason why one can consider the existence
of close kinship between the species
however some researchers opinion that the similarities between the
both animals are the product of a process of convergent evolution by
cause of his great teeth that the they named megalodon ti which means
huge tooth and if shark was also quoted in one of my theories
geographic channel size of this creature was between 15 and 20
meters with a mass that could reach 50 tons
in some early reconstitutions exceeded they had compliments which
could reach 30 meters but it is known today that omega london ti probably
did not exceed 20 to 24 meters in 1995 a proposal was made to
move the species to a new genus carcharocles this question is not yet
all settled many paleontologists advocate inclusion
in the cris dog genre that includes three other species while others
maintain the connection with the white shark include both animals of the genus
good dog the dog advocates liz opinion
that the most likely ancestor of the megalodon ti was the species or all
of the ocean while the shark protection of the species and interest
teles believes that the media london adult teams fed on whales
and which have become extinct when the polar seas became
too cold for your survival allowing the whales to
thrive during the summer even more became famous in the film
omega shark released very recently an animal of more than 40 tonnes
of muscle strength according to reports from the
renaissance was believed to gigantic triangular fossil teeth
often found encrusted rocky information belonged to
dragons and snakes this interpretation was corrected in 1667
by the Danish naturalist Nicolau which recognized them as teeth of
shark he produced a famous representation of
a shark's head with such teeth having described his findings in the
book lead off to find you say you also contained an illustration of a
tooth of being deny it good the Swiss naturalist louise agassiz was
who gave the shark its first name scientist carcharodon megalodon in 1835
in his research work recherche sur le poisson the possible searches
about fossil fish in free translation completed in 1843
the teeth of the megalodon thymus morphologically similar to the teeth
of the white shark based on this observation agassiz
categorized the species within the genus good dog although the scientific name
be sown london is often informally dubbed shark
giant white or monster shark bite could weigh more than 20
tons of prison sharks often employ
complex hunting strategies large prey
some paleontologists suggest that great shark hunting strategies
can offer clues as to how big megalodon ti could have knocked out
extremely large prey such as whales but the fossil evidence
suggests that being megalodon was more effective strategies to capture large
compared with 11 protects maids by the great shark
White paleontologists have performed a
fossil survey to determine the c6 london attack patterns with the
prey during the pliocene cetaceans very large and advanced disappeared
the megalodon ti was apparently more refined with their hunting strategies
to deal with these great whales numerous fossilized bones of
fins or segments of the pectoral fins and caudal vertebrae
of large proscenium whales were found with bite marks that
were caused by magallon attacks chivas
this paleontological evidence suggests that ômega london ti tried to immobilize a
big whale tearing the bite of your propulsion structures before killing and
feed on her The young pouches were not
enough to attack teeth whales of young people were generally found
in shallow water suggested that these Great sharks lived near the coasts
and with that they should probably have discarded large fish and
small mammals such as b sectors
Thank you for your cooperation in watch if possible share this
video so we can achieve more people and until our next meeting
-------------------------------------------
Replacing a Fuel Tank Filter Element or Canister - Step-By-Step - Duration: 1:57.
This video will show the simple process of how to replace a Goldenrod fuel tank filter
element or canister.
To replace the element in a See-Thru bowl filter,
start by turning off the flow of fuel,
then remove the bowl from the top cap, ideally with the 491 fuel tank filter wrench.
Its specially designed grooves fit over the notches on the side of the bowl,
greatly reducing the chances of cracking or breaking it.
Once you have taken off the bowl, unscrew the element,
then completely screw in your new element.
Since a new gasket comes with every new replacement element,
now is a good time to replace it from the top of the bowl (or it may be stuck inside
the top cap).
Insert the new gasket into the channel at the top of the bowl,
screw it tightly back into the top cap,
then you can resume the flow of fuel through the filter.
It's even easier to replace the canister on Spin-On canister filters once you've shut
off the fuel flow.
Simply use a pipe wrench or something similar to loosen and remove the canister from the
top cap,
and don't worry about scratching or otherwise damaging it,
since you'll just be throwing the entire canister away once you get it off.
Screw a new replacement canister into the top cap until it's tight,
then you're free to re-start the fuel flow.
Thanks for watching!
Visit our YouTube channel for more videos about Goldenrod fuel tank filters,
then let us know what else you'd like us to cover about our filters or any other D-L product!
-------------------------------------------
BACKSTAGE - Il pericolo è il nostro mestiere | HD - Duration: 1:27.
For more infomation >> BACKSTAGE - Il pericolo è il nostro mestiere | HD - Duration: 1:27. -------------------------------------------
Kia Sportage 1.6 GDI 135pk DynamicLine | LEER | GT-LINE PAKKET - Duration: 1:09.
For more infomation >> Kia Sportage 1.6 GDI 135pk DynamicLine | LEER | GT-LINE PAKKET - Duration: 1:09. -------------------------------------------
Chiara Ferragni e Fedez sposi, l'evento in diretta social: non ci sarà Fabio Rovazzi - Duration: 3:59.
For more infomation >> Chiara Ferragni e Fedez sposi, l'evento in diretta social: non ci sarà Fabio Rovazzi - Duration: 3:59. -------------------------------------------
Danilo Gossain, músico de sesión, conguero remoto ♫♪♫ - Duration: 5:35. For more infomation >> Danilo Gossain, músico de sesión, conguero remoto ♫♪♫ - Duration: 5:35. -------------------------------------------
NEED FOR SPEED: CARBON - BÖLÜM 59 - SILVERTON WAY NASIL OYNANIR? - Duration: 4:21.
For more infomation >> NEED FOR SPEED: CARBON - BÖLÜM 59 - SILVERTON WAY NASIL OYNANIR? - Duration: 4:21. -------------------------------------------
QUAL MELHOR HORÁRIO OPERAR FOREX / PLANILHA GERENCIAMENTO RISCO E ESTRATÉGIA - Duration: 6:21.
For more infomation >> QUAL MELHOR HORÁRIO OPERAR FOREX / PLANILHA GERENCIAMENTO RISCO E ESTRATÉGIA - Duration: 6:21. -------------------------------------------
some old cringey art :D - Duration: 0:23.
adoptables for warriors amino
vinnie and violet fnaf amino
dark rainbow
light rainbow
sad oc named ush
Chili - for Riley Blaze and Chili on Pokemon AMino
Infinity - Dragonhearted seriees on pokeman amino
Vinnie Mah Boi
some wolves for riley blaze and chili on pokeman amino
sad vinnie
Riley and Chili - also for riley blaze and chili on pokeman amino
rubi, aaron, gloria, star and infiniti
dragon rp amino!
Star - dragon rp amino
-------------------------------------------
How to do affiliate marketing 2018 - How to make money with affiliate marketing 2018 (100% free) - Duration: 0:32.
For more infomation >> How to do affiliate marketing 2018 - How to make money with affiliate marketing 2018 (100% free) - Duration: 0:32. -------------------------------------------
Η νύχτα μυρίζει γιασεμί La nuit sent le jasmin Θέμης Αδαμαντίδης 1982 - Duration: 2:49.
For more infomation >> Η νύχτα μυρίζει γιασεμί La nuit sent le jasmin Θέμης Αδαμαντίδης 1982 - Duration: 2:49. -------------------------------------------
Malaysians' answer about Indonesia / tanya-tanya ep. 1 - Duration: 5:12.
Mention one Indonesian movie
Ketika Cinta Bertasbih
Ayat-ayat Cinta
Tenggelamnya Kapal Van Der Wijck
Pengabdi Setan
Ayat-Ayat Cinta
Bawang Merah Bawang Putih
Ayat-Ayat Cinta
Ayat-Ayat Cinta
Cinderella
Pink: Ketika Cinta Bertasbih // Coklat: Emm... Bawang Putih Bawang Merah // Hahaha
Mention one Indonesian food
Nasi Uduk
Eee... tempe!
Bakso
Bakso
Bakso
Bakso
Nasi sejuk! Is it nasi sejuk? Eee.. no! Nasi...
Kerak telor
Pempek Selam
Coklat: Bakso? // Pink: Haa... bakso..
Mention an Indonesian artist
Rendy Pangalila
Irwansyah! Yep.. that is ok.
OMG! Who is Indonesian artist? Bayu Cinta Luna.. Hahaha
Irwansyah
Eeee... Fedil?
Peterpan
Coklat: Eee... Rendi Pangalila. // Pink: Nia Ramadhani
Rossa
Eee... Rendy Pangalila
Rendy Pangalila
What is the capital city of Indonesia?
Jakarta
Coklat: Bandung? salah ya? // Pink: Ha? Jakarta? // Coklat: Noo... why I mentioned Bandung?
Jakarta
Eeee... hmm... Jogjakarta
Jogja
Jogjakarta?
Jakarta
Jakarta
Jakarta
What is Indonesian flag colour?
Red and white
Red-White
Coklat: Ha? // Pink: Colour... Merah! // Coklat: Merah Putih
White-Red
Aaa... red and white
Red-White
Red-White
Green! Hehehehe
Red... White...
Colourful... Hehehe.. Red!
Can you spell the Indonesian alphabets?
Hng.. A, B... I don't know hehe I cant
A, Bé, Cé, Dé, A, Vé,
Hahaha... cannot... I can't
Nope
A, Bé, Cé, Dé, É... Itu.. Hehe it can be wrong...
A? B? Hehehe tak...
A... What is that "bi"? Ba? Bé? No! Haha... C... No... Hahahaha
Nope! Hahaha
É, Bé, Cé, Dé, É, F, Jé... H, I, J, K, F... Aaaa no idea...
Have you ever visited Indonesia?
Aaa not yet
I have
I have not
I have
Not yet
I have
Not yet
I have gone to Jogja
I have
Do you want to visit Indonesia?
Yes
Yes! I want to go there again. It's fun!
Definitely yes!
I want
I want
Yesss...
Of course I will go there
Coklat & Pink: Yes!
Sounds good!
Yes. I wanna shopping.. Hehehe
If you were given a chance to ask a question to Indonesian, what do you want to ask?
Do you enjoy Malaysia?
What place does sell cheap stuffs?
How about Malaysia? Hahaha
What's your opinion about Malaysia?
....
Do you like Malaysian?
Hng.. are students who are currently studying allowed to get married? hahaha
Opinion about Malaysia?
Indonesia, what is the most beautiful island? I want to go there.
Can you speak with Bahasa Indonesia in a sentence?
Oh.. ih susah tuh hehehe
Kamu...
Suka saya nggak?
Oh... Bahasa Indonesia gimana? Nah gini lah.. Aa gitulah...
Aduh gimana ni... Aa okedah.. hahaha
Kabare?
Kalau di Jakarta tu biasanya macet
Aku...
Cinta...
Sama kamu...
Gue capek! Hahahaha
Bila kapan mau datang? Eeehh bila...
Semoga sehat-sehat aja... Hihihi
GOBL*K
[sensored]
-------------------------------------------
Прогноз руны дня на сегодня 1 сентября 2018 года от Наталии Рунной #рунныймаг - Duration: 2:13.
For more infomation >> Прогноз руны дня на сегодня 1 сентября 2018 года от Наталии Рунной #рунныймаг - Duration: 2:13. -------------------------------------------
Μάρα Ζαχαρέα: Σπάνια δημόσια έξοδος με τον 22χρονο γιο της, Βασίλη! | News | fthis.gr - Duration: 1:09.
Στο Ηρώδειο βρέθηκε, το βράδυ της Τετάρτης, η Μάρα Ζαχαρέα προκειμένου να παρακολουθήσει τη συναυλία που ήταν αφιερωμένη στη μνήμη του Μάνου Ελευθερίου, τα έσοδα της οποίας πήγαν στους πυρόπληκτους
Η δημοσιογράφος και παρουσιάστρια του δελτίου ειδήσεων του Star συνοδευόταν, μάλιστα, από τον 22χρονος γιο της, Βασίλη Ρουσόπουλο
Πρόκειται για μια σπάνια δημόσια εμφάνιση που πραγματοποίησαν οι δυο τους, ωστόσο, πόζαραν ευδιάθετοι και χαμογελαστοί στον φωτογραφικό φακό του FTHIS
GR που ήταν εκεί. Δείτε τις φωτογραφίες:
Thanks!! for sharing such an informative post.
ReplyDeletePhoto Editing Services | Architecture Photo Editing | Apparel Photo Editing