Nightcore - Michael Jackson Mashup (subtitles in video)
-------------------------------------------
Gemma Galgani: "Progetti per l'estate? Mi auguro di trovare l'amore" | M.C.G.S - Duration: 2:16.
For more infomation >> Gemma Galgani: "Progetti per l'estate? Mi auguro di trovare l'amore" | M.C.G.S - Duration: 2:16. -------------------------------------------
Volkswagen Golf Variant Connected Series 1.0TSI 115PK - Duration: 1:08.
For more infomation >> Volkswagen Golf Variant Connected Series 1.0TSI 115PK - Duration: 1:08. -------------------------------------------
「Nightcore」→Pushed Down (Lyrics) - Duration: 3:08.
「Nightcore」→Pushed Down (Lyrics)
-------------------------------------------
Volkswagen Golf GTE DSG | NAVI | PAN DAK | 18 - Duration: 1:10.
For more infomation >> Volkswagen Golf GTE DSG | NAVI | PAN DAK | 18 - Duration: 1:10. -------------------------------------------
Ben Going To The Zoo | Kindergarten Songs And Videos For Kids - Duration: 15:58.
What you want to do today?
Do you wanna go to the Zoo witn me
Yesssss
Let us all go to zoo together
Zoo together, zoo together
Let us all go to zoo together
And we can play all day
We're goin' to the zoo, zoo, zoo
How about you, you, you?
You can come too, too, too
We're goin' to the zoo, zoo, zoo
Yippee
See the elephant with the long trunk swingin'
Great big ears and a long trunk swingin'
Snuffin' up peanuts with a long trunk swingin'
And we can stay all day
We come to the zoo, zoo, zoo
How about you, you, you
You can join us too, too, too
We come to the zoo, zoo, zoo
Hurry..
See all the monkeys they're scritch-scritch scratchin'
Jumpin' around and scritch-scritch scratchin'
Hangin' by the long-tail (huff huff huff)
And we can stay all day
We come to the zoo, zoo, zoo
How about you, you, you
You can join us too, too, too
We come to the zoo, zoo, zoo
There's a big black bear he's a huff-puff-a-puffin'
His coat's too heavy he's a huff-puff-a-puffin'
Don't get too close the huff-puff-a-puffin'
Or you won't stay all day
We come to the zoo, zoo, zoo
How about you, you, you
You can join us too, too, too
We come to the zoo, zoo, zoo
All right
See the lion in the zoo go roar roar roarin
Walking all around and roar roar roarin
Shaking his tale and roar roar roarin
And we can stay all day
We come to the zoo, zoo, zoo
How about you, you, you
You can join us too, too, too
We come to the zoo, zoo, zoo
Well we stayed all day and I'm gettin' sleepy
Sittin' in the car gettin' sleep sleep sleepy
Home already gettin' sleep sleep sleepy
Cause we have stayed all day
We've been to the zoo zoo zoo
So have you you you
You can came too too too
We been to the zoo zoo zoo
Goodbye kids.
-------------------------------------------
Gorgeous Beautiful Tiny Home for Sale Has Everything a Person Needs Except - Duration: 2:33.
Gorgeous Beautiful Tiny Home for Sale Has Everything a Person Needs Except
-------------------------------------------
«Alice Nevers» : Guillaume Carcaud, drôle de greffier - Duration: 4:55.
For more infomation >> «Alice Nevers» : Guillaume Carcaud, drôle de greffier - Duration: 4:55. -------------------------------------------
'미운우리새끼' 태진아 우유콜라 라면 레시피 집 공개 "진아기획 소속연예인 태진아 노래모음 28곡"|K-News - Duration: 6:47.
For more infomation >> '미운우리새끼' 태진아 우유콜라 라면 레시피 집 공개 "진아기획 소속연예인 태진아 노래모음 28곡"|K-News - Duration: 6:47. -------------------------------------------
'슈가맨2' 콜라 박준희 김영완 김송 근황 공개 "결혼 남편 강원래 아들 강선"|K-News - Duration: 6:21.
For more infomation >> '슈가맨2' 콜라 박준희 김영완 김송 근황 공개 "결혼 남편 강원래 아들 강선"|K-News - Duration: 6:21. -------------------------------------------
BRAYNIACS - Bray x Masew (Share Sub Effect + Sóng Nhạc) Đen zZz - Duration: 3:24.
For more infomation >> BRAYNIACS - Bray x Masew (Share Sub Effect + Sóng Nhạc) Đen zZz - Duration: 3:24. -------------------------------------------
Trang điểm đơn giản đi chơi | Simple Makeup Look | Lananguyenroxas - Duration: 15:32.
For more infomation >> Trang điểm đơn giản đi chơi | Simple Makeup Look | Lananguyenroxas - Duration: 15:32. -------------------------------------------
벤츠, E300e 세계 최초 공개..친환경차 점유율 확대 시도 - Duration: 4:10.
For more infomation >> 벤츠, E300e 세계 최초 공개..친환경차 점유율 확대 시도 - Duration: 4:10. -------------------------------------------
렉서스, 신형 ES 300h공개..하이브리드 시장 '공략' - Duration: 3:10.
For more infomation >> 렉서스, 신형 ES 300h공개..하이브리드 시장 '공략' - Duration: 3:10. -------------------------------------------
기아차, 전기차 니로EV 공개..주행거리는 380km - Duration: 5:59.
For more infomation >> 기아차, 전기차 니로EV 공개..주행거리는 380km - Duration: 5:59. -------------------------------------------
만트럭버스, 중형 트럭 TGL 아시아 최초 공개..현대차 마이티에 도전장 - Duration: 3:15.
For more infomation >> 만트럭버스, 중형 트럭 TGL 아시아 최초 공개..현대차 마이티에 도전장 - Duration: 3:15. -------------------------------------------
르노삼성, QM3 S에디션·트위지 스페셜 모델 공개..'눈길' - Duration: 5:15.
For more infomation >> 르노삼성, QM3 S에디션·트위지 스페셜 모델 공개..'눈길' - Duration: 5:15. -------------------------------------------
MAN WITH A MISSIONが本日6月7日に東京・東京スカイツリーにてライブイベント「『Chasing the Horizon』発売記念 ~『地平線ヲ追イカケロ』ミステリーツアー!~」を開催し - Duration: 1:25.
MAN WITH A MISSIONが本日6月7日に東京・東京スカイツリーにて イブイベント「『Chasing the Horizon』発売記念 ~『地平線ヲ追 カケロ』ミステリーツアー!~」を開催した
5thアルバム「Chasing the Horizon」のリリースを記念して行 れたこのイベントは、全国各地の集合場所からイベント会場までバスで移動すること以外 も開示されない、ミステリーツアー形式で開催された
バスツアーの目的地となったのは東京スカイツリーの地上350mにある展望デッキ。ラ ブは夜明けの時刻・朝4:20にスタートし、Jean-Ken Johnny(G, o, Raps)は「全国カラオ集マリノ皆様! 朝早クカラ、遠イトコロカラ、ヨウコ オ越シ下サイマシタ! 普段ハコンナ早イ時間ナンカニ起キテナイデショ!」と集まった 200人のファンに呼びかけ、バンドは「Take Me Under」でライブをスタ トさせた
ロックバンドが同所でライブを行うのはこれが初めて。特別なロケーションでのライブ 早朝にもかかわらず大きな盛り上がりを見せ、ラストナンバーの「Winding Ro d」を届けると、最後にJean-Ken Johnnyは「アリガトウ! マタスグニ 会イシマショウ!」と感謝の気持ちを伝えた
MAN WITH A MISSION「『Chasing the Horizon』 売記念 ~『地平線ヲ追イカケロ』ミステリーツアー!~」2018年6月7日 東京ス イツリー セットリスト01. Take Me Under02. Freak It feat.東京スカパラダイスオーケストラ03. Hey Now04. Dead End in Tokyo05. Chasing the Horizon06. M Hero07. Winding Road 関連する特集記事 MAN W TH A MISSION「Chasing the Horizon」インタビューP
-------------------------------------------
Incredibles 2 Sneak Peek
For more infomation >> Incredibles 2 Sneak Peek-------------------------------------------
2018 Smith School EMF: Antoinette Monsio Sayeh - Duration: 52:48.
- Thank you so much Dean Triantis
for that very, very kind introduction.
And thank you to you and your colleagues for inviting me
to join you at this important forum.
Good morning to everyone, very pleased to be here
with you this morning.
I'm sure we're all very pleased to see the focus on Africa
and certainly to have some Africa-like weather doesn't hurt
this morning after an interminable winter.
It's really an honor to be given this opportunity
to talk to you about the most recent macroeconomic
developments in sub-Saharan Africa,
to say a bit about the prospects for growth in the region.
And to speak a bit about the critical role of private
investments in enhancing them.
I always cherish the opportunities like this one
to engage with young professionals on sub-Saharan Africa.
It's a long way from where I was when I went
to graduate school in this country.
The interest you see among young people
about sub-Saharan Africa, as we've heard
from Dean Triantis and from Kislaya.
It's what will actually push institutions in this country
to do better, in terms of more work
and more exposure of their students to the region.
And so, every opportunity I get to help to push that forward
I do by engaging in discussions like this.
And most recently, I was at Harvard
at a ninth annual conference on Africa development that
students across five graduate schools at Harvard have
been putting together for the past nine years.
And it's really, a really great opportunity
to see what young people are thinking.
It's not a bad thing of course to engage with people
over the hill like myself.
So I'm not saying I only want to talk to young people.
So, I think reflecting what was really a noteworthy
evolution in the development finance landscape.
There's quite a big of focus these days on leveraging the
balance sheets of the multilateral development banks, MDBs,
and of development financial institutions, DFIs,
with private capital in support of the
sustainable development goals.
And there's much talk of the
role of blended finances, it's called.
That is, using official development assistance
to supplement the traditional DFI model of investing
on near market terms with concessional finance.
And some of my colleagues
at the Center For Global Development have been
in fact working on these issues
and initiatives lately as part of our
sustainable development finance program.
And there is now little dispute that high quality private
investment can indeed fuel growth
and that these initiatives
can be catalytic of such investments.
And all this is very good, but what I want to focus
on today are the conditions
under which these investments can materialize
and actually be most productive in unleashing growth.
And I want to situate this against the backdrop of what
has been weak economic growth performance in the region
over the past two years.
So the full title of my speech today is, in effect,
"Investment Fuels Growth, Leveraging is Impact on
"Sub-Saharan Africa's Growth Prospects,"
with the subtext being that this only really happens
with appropriate policies.
So I'll begin by first reviewing
the region's recent growth record.
I'll then discuss some key macroeconomic
and structural policies for attracting private
investments and sustaining growth.
And I'll close my remarks by commenting
on the respective responsibility of sub-Saharan
Africa's private and development partners
in supporting the recent search for durable growth.
So to start, a few words on the region's growth.
After close to two decades of robust 5% plus growth
and the associated Africa rising narrative that
we heard so much about,
performance in 2016 was alarmingly poor,
with negative per capita income growth
for the first time in 20 years.
And although improved growth, estimated for 2017,
was really barely enough to avert another year of shrinking
per capita income growth, per capita incomes.
And a further uptick in growth is projected this year
and next year, but momentum is still weak.
The commodity price shock and regional oil exporter's delay
in responding to it explain much of the poor performance.
In addition to South Africa's economic stagnation
admits its difficult politics.
But these average growth figures mask the
diversity of economic performance in the region.
A number of non-resource rich countries,
for example, Cote d'Ivoire, Senegal,
until last year, Kenya, have continued to grow robustly,
albeit with increased vulnerabilities
that I'll speak about shortly.
So that's in a nutshell what's been happening
on the growth side.
But what of the future,
and will Africa rising still be the story?
Notwithstanding, the recent weak average growth performance,
sub-Saharan Africa's long term growth prospects
continue to look good.
And that growth potential is clearly at the source of the
strong investor interest will still see,
and that gatherings like this one can promote.
I'm sure that the policy and practitioner's panels,
as well as the luncheon keynote later today,
will throw a lot more light on that potential.
But the region really must re-double its policy efforts
to realize that potential and to better exploit new
opportunities in the global economy
and to reap its much heralded demographic dividend.
It must now embark on returning to a path of durable growth
with a two pronged focus.
By continuing to implement corrective macroeconomic
policies in oil exporting countries on the one hand.
And on the other hand, by initiating fiscal consolidation
to address the worrisome vulnerability of increased
debt levels in non-resource intensive countries.
Let me now comment in more detail on three sets of policies
supportive of these two points that I've just sketched out.
The first is an emphasis on revenue mobilization.
The second is addressing debt vulnerabilities.
And the third on policies to foster improved
competitiveness and economic diversification.
Domestic resource mobilization has actually received
quite a bit of attention since the 2015 Finance
for Development Conference in Addis Ababa.
And there's been a strong consensus that it is
the most sustainable development finance.
There's indeed significant potential
for raising tax revenue,
especially in oil exporting countries.
For example, at only 6% of GDP,
Nigeria's tax ratio is the lowest in the region.
And most certainly doesn't reflect its tax potential.
The IMF estimates that the average sub-Saharan African
country could increase its tax to GDP ratio
by three to five percentage points,
with the potential in oil exporters
being the highest at 8 1/4%.
And while the region saw the largest increase worldwide
in tax revenues since 2000.
At about 18% of GDP in 2016, a medium tax ratio continues
to be relatively low.
The good progress made in increasing revenues
in sub-Saharan Africa will need to be sustained,
if in the face of limited aid, rising borrowing cost,
and debt sustainability concerns,
if the region is going to make further progress
in filling infrastructure gaps, in building human capital.
All that with a view to, of course,
attracting more private investments
and meeting other development needs.
So moving to the second set of supportive policies,
there has been, rightly, increased commentary
on sub-Saharan Africa's debt
vulnerabilities in recent months.
I think you've seen articles here and there,
including in the Economist talking about this
and, of course, institutions like the IMF speaking
about this more and more in recent months.
Debt stalks have risen rapidly throughout the region,
but especially in oil exporters.
While also inching upwards, they've increased less rapidly
in non-resource intensive countries
and in other resource intensive countries.
An increase in the debt level is in and of itself,
of course, not a bad thing.
But the pace of debt accumulation we've seen
in recent years is indeed worrisome.
The sharp rise in debt stalks in the region is largely
driven by fiscal deficits.
Debt service costs have increased,
especially for oil exporters
and other natural resource producers.
In Zambia, for example, in 2011, interest payments
on debt were about 20% of the money spent
on health and education.
But by 2017, they had risen to 50%.
Nigeria's debt service has increased from 22% of revenues
in 2016 to more than 60% in 2017.
From only seven in 2013, the number of sub-Saharan African
low income countries in debt to stress,
or at high risk of debt to stress, increased to 12 in 2016.
And several countries with sovereign
credit ratings have been downgraded.
So while there is good news for containing debt
in countries' plans for fiscal consolidation.
Implementation of such plans is often postponed.
And stronger recovery and safeguarding debt sustainability
certainly requires steadfast implementation.
Fiscal consolidation is, of course,
often easier pronounced than achieved
and can harm growth,
if it's not designed and implemented appropriately.
But there's encouraging research, again from the IMF,
that has shown that when accomplished through increased
revenues, the fiscal consolidation required
for containing debt is less damaging
to growth in the region.
But of course ladies and gentlemen,
returning the region to a path of growth
requires not only corrective macroeconomic policies.
Many of the factors that had propelled growth since the
mid-1990s have ended or are receding.
Apart from better macro-policies,
these were higher aid flows, debt relief,
record high commodity prices,
and the uptick in global liquidity
from advanced countries' unconventional monetary policies
in the aftermath of the global financial crisis.
So I'll now spend some time highlighting needed structural
policies to improve competitiveness
so that it can become a key
driver of sub-Saharan African future growth.
Competitiveness was in fact not a significant factor
underpinning the growth momentum from the mid-1990s.
Again, this is an average picture.
So of course there were some countries where improved
competitiveness was a driving factor in growth.
But overall for the region, this was not the case.
And the last 15 years actually saw a loss of competitiveness
in the region, especially in commodity exporting countries.
Improving the region's competitiveness
by further trade liberalization and by addressing needed
reforms in the financial sector
and in the business environment are critical,
so are high return infrastructure investments
to help reduce private investment costs.
We'll learn more about the business environment
from Albert Zeufack's keynote address, I believe,
in the next session.
So let me not dwell on that but instead say a bit more
about addressing the infrastructural deficit
and about trade and financial sector reforms.
And much has been written about
and said about poor infrastructure as the key constraint
to investment, to private investment
and growth in sub-Saharan Africa.
In addressing it has indeed been a key focus of African
policymakers and of their relationships
with development partners over the past decade.
I know this from my eight years, you know,
leading the Africa's, the IMF's African Department,
when financing infrastructure was really,
what dominated our policy dialogue.
And, you know, the how to do that
while maintaining debt sustainability.
I also lived that, of course,
as Liberia's Minister of Finance
in the immediate aftermath of our devastating civil war,
when infrastructure was nonexistent
after that period of war.
But here again we're likely
to hear more about infrastructure
I think from Albert's address.
So rather than repeating the facts
and enumerating the many challenges in that,
in this area, I only wanna stress the need
to insure that infrastructure is financed
in a manner protective of the domestic revenue base
and of debt sustainability while mitigating fiscal risk.
I should first note that protecting the revenue base is
essential, because domestic resources,
tax and non-tax revenues, but also domestic borrowing.
Domestic resources constitute and currently provide the
bulk of financing for infrastructure in the region.
And increasing them will remain the best
means of doing so in the future.
I want to, however, be clear that managing debt levels,
with manageable debt levels, countries can
and should borrow to expand needed infrastructure.
But doing so in a sustainable fashion requires the maximum
use of concessional financing by countries
with higher risk of debt to stress
and low institutional capacity,
as well as rigorous priority setting
and cost benefit analysis
to select the highest return investments.
And these critical elements of improved public investment
management are also necessary in countries
with lower risk of debt to stress who may consider
more non-concessional financing.
Now, after domestic resources and external borrowing,
the third source of infrastructure financing is public
private partnerships or PPPs,
which are attracting many countries in the region.
While there's clearly significant potential
for increasing the envelope
for infrastructure investments through PPPs.
But poorly designed PPPs can result in contingent
liabilities often in the form of guarantees
to private partners.
And mitigating the associated risk, it requires carefully
assessing, disclosing, and budgeting for those risks.
And significant strengthening of institutional
and legal frameworks is necessary to benefit from PPPs,
including a strong, clear role for the Ministry of Finance.
With that said on infrastructure, I'll move next
to the region's global and regional trade integration.
Sub-Saharan Africa's trade expanded rapidly.
You heard Kislaya say some things about that.
It's expanded rapidly over the past two decades of high
growth with significant increase in goods exports
between 1995 and 2013 when the export to GDP ratio rose
from 20.5% to 27.5%.
And the region's export destination also shifted
significantly from advanced countries to emerging markets,
with China becoming the single
most important trading partner.
But when seen against the rapid expansion of global trade
over the same period, sub-Saharan Africa just barely
maintained its share of world trade.
And when using the measure of centrality in global trade,
in the global trade network, with centrality measuring,
covering not only the size of exports,
but also the number of trade partners
and the relative weight of those trade
partners in global trade.
When using that measure of centrality,
sub-Saharan Africa is still the least integrated region.
By almost doubling its share over the past two decades,
developments in regional trade have been more impressive.
Although, at only 15% of total trade, intra-regional formal
trade in goods is still below other regions,
other regions estimated 17% in Central and South America,
42% in North America, 62% in the European Union,
and 64% in Asia.
More progress has been made in some regional economic
communities, such as the East African Community, the EAC
and the West African Economic
and Monetary Union or the WAMU.
And some countries are already focusing
on leveraging their comparative advantage
and integrating into global value chains
and have been successful in that regard.
Ethiopia, Kenya, the Seychelles, South Africa, Tanzania,
they're making good progress there.
In the recent signing of the Continental Free Trade Area
Agreement by 44 countries is of a
welcome development obviously.
That whole promise for greater
regional economic integration, provided, of course,
that Nigeria and South Africa, the region's two largest
economies do eventually join.
The increased interconnectedness expected
from these developments can best avert the risk of negative
cross border spillovers, if Nigeria, South Africa,
and Angola, the three largest economies accounting
for 60% of sub-Saharan Africa's economy,
if those countries pursue more
sustainable growth enhancing policies.
But not withstanding its two decade trade expansion,
the region continues to trade below its potential.
Reduce tariff and non-tariff barriers.
Improved access to credit for the private sector,
better infrastructure, better business environment,
all of those can position the region to seize opportunities
in global trade more effectively.
Ladies and gentlemen, I know that at a time of increased
protectionist pressures in this country
and in some other countries,
this is a more difficult message
to give to African policymakers.
But it is one that remains nonetheless pertinent.
Trade openness helps spur the region's past growth
and can certainly continue to do so in the future.
Let me now briefly discuss policies needed
to improve the private sector's access to credit.
I think it's especially important to highlight this issue
in the context of rising domestic public debt that has
further increased the bank's exposure to the sovereign
in some countries and reduced room for lending
to the private sector.
So this disturbing development has resulted
in declining credit growth to the private sector,
from an average of almost 19% in 2011 to 2013
to 11% in 2014 to 2016.
And there's been a contraction in real terms
between March 2006 and March 2017.
So at a time when, of course, there's a lot of talk
at the policy level about attracting more private
investment, you see a decrease in the amount of credit
that is possible for the private sector
because of what's happening with public sector debt.
There's some evidence pointing to this type of crowding out
in Angola, in the central African Economic
and Monetary Union Countries and in The Gambia.
So well orchestrated fiscal consolidation needs
to be pursued in countries with crowding out
to permit more lending to the private sector.
The removal of benefits that provide excessive incentives
to hold government securities
and implementation of macro-prudential measures
to limit the larger exposure to the sovereign may be
necessary in some countries.
And financial sector reforms such as property titling
and credit bureaus to facilitate information will
help to encourage diversification of the banks'
portfolios to more, towards more private lending.
One impressive development in the region's financial
sector in recent years has, of course,
been the rapid rise of the pan African banks,
with the scale of their operations now larger than
those of traditional European
and American banks in the region.
To reap the full potential of pan African banks
in expanding the private sector's access to credit
and to mitigate the risk of negative spillovers,
measures to strengthen cross border consolidated supervision
and to safeguard and manage risk also need
to be implemented in a timely fashion.
And as is widely known and, again, Kislaya spoke to this,
innovative financial services such as mobile banking
has expanded the access to a larger share of the population.
But small businesses and female entrepreneurs continue
to have very limited access to credit.
These inequalities can be addressed through the introduction
and strengthening of appropriate enabling environment
to further broaden financial inclusion
and by supporting more bank competition.
Given the impact they can have on private sector confidence,
it goes without saying that legal and other reforms needed
for strengthening institutions and improving governance
are also critical for attracting investments in new sectors,
as required for diversification.
Ladies and gentlemen, all these policies I've discussed
in the past 15 minutes or so are essential
to the regions objectives of attracting more private
investments, of structural transformation,
and of diversification.
As has typically been the case, when confronted
with low commodity prices,
there has been quite a lot of talk lately
about diversification since the 2014 oil price shock.
Diversification does indeed offer
the region a path to durable growth,
but only, and only, if attention to it, in fact,
outlast the shock.
Having said that, the policies I've sketched do not imply
a one size fits all recipe for sub-Saharan Africa.
Getting the policy mix right and playing
to individual country's strengths is important
for fostering diversification, and that's evident
in the different approaches pursued with some success
in Mauritius, in Burkina Faso, in Rwanda, Uganda, Botswana.
But with all of these countries adhering
to macroeconomic stability while taking different approaches
based on their own strengths.
So I've spoken at some length
about the responsibilities of sub-Saharan African
policymakers in their search
for increased levels of high quality investments.
I want to now turn to how the region's partners can help,
starting with its development partners,
be they international financial institutions,
the IMF, the World Bank, the African Development Bank,
or traditional bilateral or new bilateral partners.
The region will need continued policy advice,
as well as financial and capacity building support
from its development partners
to both deliver critical public goods that governments are
best placed to do and to facilitate
increased private investment.
But the specific need will of course differ by country.
The IFIs and traditional bilateral partners must continue
to demonstrate agility in responding
to the region's evolving needs.
I think good recent examples of such responsiveness are
revisions to the World Bank's and IMF's debt
sustainability analysis and to the IMF's debt limits policy
to, among other things, reflect the new kinds of financing
risk that countries are now facing and to facilitate more
non-concessional financing while
maintaining debt sustainability.
Another example of responsiveness, I think, is the G20's
compact with Africa, which aims to catalyze increased
foreign private investments in countries with good policies.
And as we all know, another major partner for sub-Saharan
Africa these days is China, which has certainly been agile
and is frequently praised for being responsive
to the region's needs,
especially in infrastructure in recent years.
China's One Belt, One Road Initiative can potentially
further expand infrastructure investments
with private sector financing.
Although, debt sustainability implications, again,
will need to be watched.
That said, China's voice could also be more strongly heard
in urging continued policy adjustment and reform
in sub-Saharan African oil exporters
to contain debt to manageable levels.
Debt is now unsustainable in several countries
where China is the largest creditor.
And it's full engagement with countries on these issues
will be critical in finding workable solutions.
Beyond this, the broader international community has
a important role and responsibility of advocating against
the protectionist and inward looking proclivities.
We see here, in the United States,
in order to create and safeguard a global environment
more supportive of private investment
and strong sustain sub-Saharan African growth.
So let me conclude my remarks by highlighting some of the
private investors' responsibilities in insuring growth
friendly and governance friendly investments,
a win win for sub-Saharan African
countries and investors alike.
Of course, one should avoid generalizations
about private sector behavior,
since different investors, of course,
have engaged differently with countries in the region.
That said, I think a few conclusions are still in order.
In the past, foreign investors were rightly hesitant
about making long standing, long gestating,
and costly investments amidst
political and policy uncertainties.
So enabling environments still requires significant
improvement in some countries,
but overall it has evolved in a positive direction
across the region in the past two decades.
Likewise, as pointed out earlier, the instruments
and other support being made available to investors
by MDBs or DFIs and bilateral agencies
to manage risk have increased.
I believe that investors can and should, therefore,
respond to these positive developments by contributing
to further improvements in the enabling
environment in four ways.
First, in recognition of their own survey based feedback,
that infrastructure, rather than taxes, is the most
binding constraint, investors should resist pressing
for base eroding tax exemptions.
While it is reasonable for them to request well targeted
incentives that directly reduce the cost of capital,
open ended and profit based tax holidays are less effective
and can cause longterm erosion of the tax base.
Second, investors should likewise only make
use of guarantees and other risk mitigating instruments
provided by MDBs and bilateral agencies when truly needed.
By so doing, the can help avert excessive guarantees
and moral hazard that could result from the Compact
with Africa and other blended finance initiatives.
Third, investors can best support institution building
and good governance, critical to quality investments.
By maximum transparency in their own operations
and by strictly abiding
by a country's public financial management
laws, revenue code, and regulations,
as well as the roles of key ministries,
like the Ministry of Finance,
in negotiating and monitoring their agreements,
investors can consistently demonstrate their desire
and respect for stronger institutions.
Finally, with some countries, with some reluctance
to accept the private sector's key role persisting
in some countries, investment in more outreach can increase
local communities and civil society organizations'
appreciation and be used to effectively solicit their views
and concerns about proposed or ongoing investments.
So colleagues, ladies and gentlemen,
I've covered quite a bit of ground this morning,
focusing mainly on some remaining policy challenges
for sub-Saharan African countries
and on action needed from the region's development
and private partners, you know,
with a view to ensuring that investments are indeed of the
highest quality and do indeed fuel growth.
I trust that my remarks will provide a good introduction
to some of the issues you'll be taking up
during the rest of the day.
And, I very much look forward
to your comments and questions.
Thank you very much for your attention.
(audience applauds)
(too far from mic to hear)
- Thank you very much.
That's very, very interesting.
If you can talk a little bit about what can other developed
countries, such as the United States, the European countries
do to learn from the China One Belt, One Road Initiative.
What's working there for Africa?
And what can we learn from them?
Thank you.
- Well, I'd say it's early days yet to draw lessons
from the One Belt, One Road Initiative.
It's just taking off.
It's starting to take off.
And certainly there are no concrete examples of what
has been produced from that in sub-Saharan Africa
to draw lessons from other partners.
But, there's been a call for a very long time
from policymakers for certainly more attention
to infrastructure and that has been heard
I think by many partners.
I spoke earlier about some of the adjustments that'd been
made to the debt limits policy in institutions like the IMF
to try to accommodate country's access
to more non-concessional financing
while managing debt sustainability.
But that's one responsiveness that has been there.
There are countries like this one that have invested
considerably in Power Africa in trying to respond
to a need for electricity
in sub-Saharan Africa, which is huge.
And so, I think it's too early to comment
on the One Belt, One Road.
But, it is indeed encouraging that across the board
you see quite a few initiatives on infrastructure
responding to what countries have
been saying for many years.
- [Man] I'll ask a question, and then I'll (mumbles).
So you've had the advantage of seeing this from both sides,
from the development partner side as well as
in the finance ministry, and what can you tell us
about the constraint that each side faces,
which being able to see both help you,
because I've often heard people say the World Bank,
the IMF, they don't understand the constraints we face.
And I've seen it in my country, in India.
But having seen it from both sides,
what can you tell us?
- Well, I think one thing that is not talked
about very much, in terms of the ability of both sides
to maybe adapt how they're operating
and interacting with each other, is the political economy
context or the political context
in which both sides work in.
Of course, at the level of country authorities,
the Minister of finance and other Ministers who are
struggling to push the reforms that they consider
to be the best course of trying to get to that growth
that everybody wants.
There's a lot of politics around what the Ministers
of Finance can or cannot do.
And, I think adapting an understanding to those politics
is really critical for the international institutions
and partners out there to understand a bit better than
they have in the past.
But likewise, IFIs in particular, and bilaterals as well,
do have their own politics that they have
to adjust and work within and adjust too.
And, there are times when in the IFIs, in particular,
there clearly very strong technical views of what is a
better course of action, a more adapted course of action
to a particular country, but where there are many pressures
from the board and others that have seen experiences
in other countries that want to see so called evenhandedness
sometimes applied in the policy prescriptions that those
institutions give to countries.
So, it's a matter of really understanding the
politics of institutions, understanding the
politics of individual countries
and trying to work with those in trying to get enough of a
groundswell, in terms of changing how those politics
constrain better choice of policy prescriptions.
I think that's one lesson certainly
from my sitting on both sides,
that I think a lot more work on political economy
issues is important, yeah.
- [Woman] Thank you for your presentation Dr Sayeh.
I have a question, which is just peripherally related
to what you presented, but I would love
to hear your thoughts on it.
It has to do with the social sectors in African
and particularly around education and health.
What do you see as the role of aid or investments
by private actors or government investments
in helping these two sectors advance across the continent,
given that there's so much heterogeneity across different
countries in how sophisticated these sectors are?
Thank you. - Indeed, indeed.
I can't say I have a huge amount of expertise
on the sectoral issues.
But I certainly know that the constraining factor of limited
fiscal space is an important one.
And, of course, in not just recent years, for many years,
international financial institutions have tried
to help countries work on that.
It was a whole experience of the hippic period for example,
where, you know, resources saved
from debt relief, of course, were a targeted on education
and health spending and monitored and where targets
for social sector spending continued to be monitored
in, say, IMF programs for countries.
All of that is helpful potentially,
but it's just one step of trying to make sure that more
resources are available for education and health.
But of course, the choice of what types of education
interventions is an important one in what makes
for high quality education or high quality health services.
Perhaps not enough attention, well certainly
from the World Bank a lot of work on that.
But it's not enough to focus just
on making that fiscal space.
It's really important to go beyond that
and help countries select the highest return investments
in those areas and of course make those investments
sustainable down the road.
The private sector, I think, increasingly we've seen
a lot of private funding of interventions in the social
sectors, of course, not just humanitarian,
but foundations over long period of time working
with African countries so to help them.
That is very positive, a new, relatively new developing
that I think countries like the one I worked in, Liberia,
certainly benefited quite a bit from in that immediate
post-conflict period to where there was a significant
transition to be made from resources made available
by humanitarian institutions in the war time period
to more development financing which couldn't come
and stream quickly enough, relative to the needs
because of huge arrears that Liberia had to IFIs
at the time.
And, interventions from private actors was hugely important
and very helpful in those days, yeah.
- [Man] Dr Sayeh I would like to thank you so much
for your leadership in promoting the idea of having
a sound financial policy in Africa for government
to be able to support the long term economic goals.
- Thank you.
- [Man] You did that particularly in Liberia
during a very challenging period of time.
I'm an entrepreneur for long time.
I would like to express the voice of the voiceless,
an entrepreneur in Africa in constructions and other stuff
that been developing businesses.
And I am based in the US to try to assist US companies
doing the international, especially to Africa,
a better understanding the market there
and the cultures and environment.
There's something that I didn't really quite understood
from your comments, because you keep on stressing
on that raising taxes.
The level of taxes is not enough in Africa.
If you think that Africa to reach the economic goals,
they need to attract more foreign, private investments.
How do you think that it will be really consistent in Africa
to both raise taxes
and to attract more international investment?
At a time where, as you know, all countries around the world
are trying to lower the taxes.
So don't you think that it should
be something that we should
just be, you know, very careful about promoting that,
rather than to doing harm into the main goal,
which is in fact building growth in Africa,
and not just raising taxes?
Thank you.
- No thank you for that question.
I think to answer it, it's important to clarify
that I was talking about raising more revenues,
not necessarily raising tax rates to get that revenue.
Certainly there are lots of potential for raising revenues
by simply collecting what is on the books
and what is already mandated by the revenue code.
It's not a matter of simply just jacking
up the corporate income tax rate.
It's a matter of better managing how you grant exemptions,
if you're going to grant them at all,
what types of exemptions you grant,
not open ended tax holidays that are never scaled back
and that really undermine your revenue base, for example.
It's a matter of being more systematic about the conditions
under which you give exemptions and the process
for doing so that is transparent
and that is not, you know,
one minister just passing some exemptions somewhere.
Those are the types of things I think significant potential
for revenue for really better managing tax exemptions
which are huge in sub-Saharan Africa.
And if you ask, as I was saying in my remarks,
if you ask investors in quite a bit of survey research
asking investors what really constrains their investment,
they don't say it's taxes necessarily.
They say it's an infrastructure.
How in the world are the authorities going
to build infrastructure if they don't have a tax base?
That's a problem.
They can't just borrow to finance infrastructure.
Certainly they need to combine sensible borrowing
but also with higher revenues
to be able to finance infrastructure.
So that's the balance.
No one is, you know, suggesting that countries go
after completely, you know, taxing out the private sector.
They're certainly not going to get what they intend
to, in terms of, you know, willingness to invest,
if they look so unattractive from the tax perspective.
So, point well taken, but I was not trying to suggest
that countries just jack up their taxes.
- [Man] Hi, I have two questions,
and this gentleman actually kind of touched
on one of them. - Okay.
- [Man] In terms of taxes.
I won't ask that question again,
but just as a comment.
I think if taxes are lower on corporations,
then that would create opportunities
to create job, where, at the same time,
individuals are paying taxes then that would generate
revenue for the government as well.
So, I kind of agree with him for entrepreneurs
who are outside investors from the US, for example,
or other countries coming in,
I think taxes are very important for them,
because, again, the risk is high.
Of course, they're asking for high returns,
but they also come, by coming in and investing
in African countries, they're creating jobs,
which eventually would generate high revenues.
Now, the other topic I wanted to touch on,
you mentioned mobile banking,
and I talked to a lot of people who do business
in Africa, and they said the actual growth of mobile
usage and, you know, mobile technology has helped
a lot of growth and access
to financial resources and so forth.
With cryptocurrencies that are becoming very common
in third world countries and growing countries
and so forth, growing economies, do you see that as
a risk to individual investors, to outside investors,
to private investors, and how does that come into play?
Is it going to have a positive impact on the economy
and investments or is it negative, in terms of the tax
revenues for the government again, you know,
the transactions that are happening,
regulations on cryptocurrencies?
I would think that it's gonna help a lot of people
to have access to finances again,
because it's transactions, no fee transactions
between individuals, easier access to finances,
but at the same time, it's harder to track.
So, is that additional risk for investors?
Thank you.
- Yeah, no, thanks for that question.
I can't say I know enough,
a huge amount, about cryptocurrencies
to really answer your question fully on that.
But clearly, you pointed out the risk that there would be
from that type of currency, if the regulatory capability,
the monitoring capability of countries are weak,
and they're ability to actually know what's going on
because of that type of operation is impaired.
And so, just as mobile banking, I think,
has shown that some adaptation of the regulatory framework
is necessary to maximize the contribution of mobile banking
while really containing and mitigating risk from it.
I think countries will also have to carefully look
at their own regulatory environment to see how best
to benefit from cryptocurrencies.
- [Woman] Hello, my name is Janiba Sesay,
I'm a recent graduate here at the Smith Executive MBA,
so very excited that my former
professor Krislaya invited me.
(woman questioner and lecturer laugh)
I was in banking for a long time,
but after graduation now I have my own company.
And I'm in the diaspora.
As we know lately in the African diaspora there has been
a lot of involvement, whether it is through social media
or to democraces that are emerging right now.
There has been a lot of contributing factor.
Where I'm from, the Gambia, that has been a big factor
to the most recent government there.
So my question that we have is most people in the diaspora
try to do investment into our,
you know, our native countries.
But the challenge is sometime we have is try
to work with the government.
And sometime going around the government could lead
to some private investment that are not sustainable.
Being a former Finance Minister of Liberia,
how would you advise those of us here in the diaspora
try to make those changes that would be a lasting impact?
Thank you.
- No I think you've really underscored, you know,
the huge potential there is for countries
to benefit from their diasporas,
and certainly that's the case for Liberia,
which is a very dependent on, you know,
remittances from the huge diaspora created by the war.
And there's a lot of interest currently
in a lot of looking into how to actually encourage the
diaspora to engage more,
and what sort of operations and what sort of changes are
necessary and how, you know, in certain areas
to allow them to do more.
Work in progress, you know, I think it's certainly
the diaspora people have to, I think,
link up with people who are on the ground
and who know the ins and outs of what is happening
to be able to put together a sensible, you know, proposal.
And have to keep their eyes very close to the ground
in terms of the policy and regulatory developments
what may make for profitable investment or not,
what exactly they need the authorities to change
to make their investments more productive.
And so, I think a lot of investment
in just the analytics about what is happening on the ground
is really important, to be able to have your foot
into the authorities too in terms of what
they need to do to change.
I know it's easy sometimes when one is in the diaspora
to throw darts at authorities.
Certainly that was the case when we were, you know,
trying to start in Liberia as well.
You know, everybody thought that they knew best how
to get things going.
But things can look very different when you're there
in the ground in the middle of it all.
So, I think it's really important
to have that closer link, yeah.
(too far from mic)
Oh, okay.
Thank you.
- No, no, please stay here.
(too far from mic)
So, let me formally thank you so much
for this really enlightening session.
And thank you for the discussion after that.
We have a gift and I think it'll photograph better.
- Oh boy.
(everyone laughs)
- Thank you.
- Thank you.
(audience applauds)
-------------------------------------------
2018 Smith School EMF: Investment and Business Development - Duration: 1:02:27.
- Thank you very much for this opportunity.
We have an exciting panel
with significant transactional experience
and we are going to try to cover as many issues as possible
at the granular level
and then open it up for questions
so that we can impart the various experiences on this panel.
I'd like to start with each one of you,
sort of opening statement to talk about your experiences,
focusing primarily on this concept
of mobilizing capital for Africa
and then we can go into key facets of your experiences.
I'll start with you, Uduak.
- Sure.
Good morning, or I guess we're moving into
afternoon, everyone.
My name is Uduak Essien.
I think I was introduced earlier but I am a director
at the Export-Import Bank of the U.S.
I'm a graduate of the MBA program here back in 2002,
so quite a while ago.
It was a good program back then,
I think it still is a great program so
I am very happy to be here today and share the dais
with my esteemed panelists, so thank you.
At first, I feel obliged to give you a little bit
of background about EXIM Bank and then just
perhaps a few general comments about the work
of EXIM Bank in Africa and my personal experiences as well.
The Export-Import Bank is a 100% owned government agency,
it's an independent agency of the U.S. government.
It's the official export credit agency of the U.S.
The whole idea behind export credit agencies,
whether you support the idea or not,
is to level the playing field
for exporters from respective countries.
My job at EXIM is to support U.S. exports,
U.S. exports around the, globally and also to Africa.
Take for example if you have a large infrastructure project
being developed in Nigeria,
a power project that's buying gas turbines from the U.S.,
we can finance that project
because it's purchasing the gas turbines from the U.S.
and how we calculate our financing is actually based on
what is actually bought from the U.S.
Our mission is to support U.S. jobs through exports.
That's what brings us to the table.
We don't compete with commercial banks.
The idea behind the export credit agency
is to kind of augment what they do.
There's certain markets where commercial banks
are not interested or they cannot provide
the type of financing that is needed,
whether it's tenor or they can't accept the risk,
and those are ideal places for export credit agencies
such as EXIM to step in and meet the gap,
so we're known as banks of last resort,
well EXIM is known as a bank of last resort,
that's the role that we play.
We as mandated, as part of our charter,
actually have a mandate to support transactions
in Sub-Saharan Africa
and so we have a senior level committee that is designed
to helps us reach our goals and to pursue initiatives
and we're very focused on that.
Me being in the power sector,
we're also very focused on energy projects.
We have renewables, initiatives,
so we're very interested in doing renewables, projects,
renewable energy projects on the continent as well.
Just one more quick comment
that I don't wanna fail to make is that
one of the things that, because I know we have
some developers and business owners here,
one of the things that I do want folks to take away is that
the U.S. government as a whole has a variety of programs
along the continuum of finance for different types
of businesses within the African marketplace.
We have upfront programs from like USTDA
with feasibility financing, pre-feasibility financing,
all the way to say an EXIM bank that comes in
at the very end when you're talking about
large infrastructure projects to finance those projects.
So you have Department of Commerce, you have USAID,
you have Power Africa that was also mentioned earlier
which has done a lot of work in creating the
or helping the enabling environment.
Then you have a bank like EXIM
that could come in when it comes to
the larger infrastructure projects
and help those projects go forward.
So I'll, go just-- - Great, thank you very much.
Tom, would you like to chime in on your perspective?
- Yeah, so I'm Tom Coogan from
the United States African Development Foundation.
I'm actually joined by my colleague here,
Michelle McKenzie, who also is with USADF.
USADF is an independent government agency,
in some ways similar to the EXIM Bank
where we have our own board of directors and we get our
appropriation directly from Congress.
What we do is we focus on African owned
and African managed organizations
for creating a pathway to prosperity
for those for underserved communities in Africa.
What does that mean?
We have a program in 20 countries, programs in 20 countries,
where we have a local partner and then we give seed capital,
generally grants, to organizations
in order to help them first develop capacity in some cases
and then expand for profitable expansion
so they can scale up what they're doing.
We look for the organization itself to be profitable
and then we look for the benefits to the grassroots members
or in other ways benefits to the grassroots.
We do this in three ways,
we work with agricultural cooperatives
financing in a value chain approach generally
and we have those programs in all 20 countries.
We're working with off-grid energy
as a member of Power Africa, we sit at the table
with EXIM Bank and others as one of the 12
inter-agency organizations working under Power Africa.
We're financing off-grid energy
in a major way in 10 countries in Africa
and then we're expanding that
and we're doing it in smaller ways,
but hoping to expand it to all 20 countries where we work.
Those take the form of that could be solar,
I'll get into that in a minute but that could,
about 2/3 of what fund is solar,
the other third, biogas, biomass, hydro, mini hydro, wind,
and other types of innovations, sometimes hybrids.
We also do youth entrepreneurship.
We have a nascent youth entrepreneurship program
in about two countries and in small ways we're doing that,
we're funding young African entrepreneurs to,
in most cases, to start up or to expand
the small businesses they're working with.
We began with the YALI program,
the Young African Leadership Initiative,
and then we've expanded beyond that
and we're continuing to do that.
We just concluded in Nairobi, Kenya at the end of February,
the Young African Entrepreneurship Summit, sorry, 2018,
and that was the first one that's been held
and we're gonna continue to do that on an annual basis.
We had about 55 young African entrepreneurs there.
We had about 100 participants including banks,
other finance institutions, other mentorship opportunities.
In that case, we're funded by Citibank
as well as using our own funding and
mentioned earlier, a public-private partnership.
We also work extensively
in the public-private partnership arena.
We have funding from some of our governments.
For example, the government of Uganda,
we have a $10 million, five year program
with the government of Uganda where they fund half,
we fund half of our projects,
they give us the money directly.
We work with corporations like Citibank or GE Africa.
GE Africa has funded us directly under
our off-grid energy initiative
since the very beginning for about the past four years.
We work with other types of organizations
and we're rapidly expanding these type of partnerships
and really doing outreach
for these type of partnership opportunities.
In the off-grid power sector, it was mentioned earlier,
over 600 billion Africans are currently without power,
have no direct access to power
and one anecdote that I like to tell is
the Dallas Cowboy's stadium on game day
uses more electricity than the country of Liberia.
It's hard to believe, and we're doing programs
in Liberia for example where we've,
doing small solar mini grids, 100 households in one case
and expanding that into other cases,
some solar home systems, we're expanding organizations
that are selling and implementing those.
We have the president, the first female president in Africa,
Ellen Sirleaf Johnson, come to our site and said
"Power Africa and USADF are actually doing something,"
and turned the lights on and it helped inaugurate
one of our sites in Central Liberia.
I wanted to talk about, and how we identify that,
also under power I would mention we're doing a
extensive Women in Energy program.
We started this a year and a half ago.
We're identifying women energy entrepreneurs in Africa.
We started with three countries,
we're expanding it this year,
where we give them seed capital for funding
to expand their enterprises and then help them
on a profitable growth and expansion trajectory.
We're also focusing on what we call
the power agricultural nexus, and what that means is
rural areas really is where there really is a power deficit
and in rural areas is also where
most of the agriculture takes place
so we've been working on innovations
and funding organizations that are doing things like
solar powered water pumping for irrigation,
solar powered grain milling where you can mill corn,
for example, right at the farm gate,
solar powered refrigeration for fish to preserve,
have less post-harvest losses,
or for vegetables, or in other ways.
We have programs there in Nigeria,
in Kenya, and other places.
We're also along the lines of a public-private capital
or public-private partnerships.
We're working with All-on which is an organization
that's basically Shell Oil but in Nigeria,
but they are the impact investment armor of Shell Oil
and that's on my mind because yesterday and this morning,
we've been approving and reviewing and approving
some projects that we're doing together
and what we're doing there is we're giving seed capital
to half of the funding to an organization in Nigeria
and All-on is giving a convertible loan and/or
a small piece of equity, we're doing this together.
They're gonna continue to work with the organization
over the years eventually so that they can move up
in kind of a mentorship role but also in a capital role
and this is, we signed this just last December
and we'll be funding those projects
within the next two months.
That's just a little sample of what we do
and I've got a lot more to talk about but
I'll stop there. - Sure.
Thank you very much Tom.
Brionne, would you like to chime in about the
U.S. Chamber of Commerce? - Thank you.
Good morning everyone, it's a thrill to be joined by
such esteemed panelists and an honor to be with you today.
I was asked to talk a little bit about my background
and what we do at the Chamber.
My bio has already been highlighted but what might be useful
is to talk a little bit about the way in which
I came to the work that I'm now doing at the U.S. Chamber
because it might be helpful in terms of
touching on some of the themes that came up
as part of the last presentation around
kind of aid and trade and the shift I think
that's rapidly underway in terms of the private sector
and private sector being leveraged
to really further development objectives.
I've spent the last two decades or so
working on the continent of Africa.
Did my undergrad in African studies at Georgetown and then
spent time both overseas and also in Washington
working in the development space with the organization
called the National Democratic Institute.
While living in South Africa,
I witnessed first hand some of the trends
that the prior speaker discussed in terms of
the growth of overseas or foreign direct investment
really overshadowing the overseas development assistance.
Also the youth bulge, a growing entrepreneurial
and young population across the continent.
And new business models that were being pioneered
by American companies looking to invest in the continent.
I went to graduate school then
to look at market-based approaches to development
and to understand better the ways
in which American companies could really tap into
the potential that exists on the continent.
Now at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce,
and I should mention also, in the intervening period
between graduate school and joining the Chamber,
I spent two years in the Obama administration
working on Power Africa, Trade Africa,
the Young African Leaders Initiative,
and worked closely with Tom on Power Africa,
and many other colleagues that were driving this change
that I mentioned in terms of leveraging private capital
to achieve development objectives
and worked at the intersection of legislation
and also the executive branch to explain the value
of tax payer investments in these new programs.
For the last year or so, I've been working
at the Chamber of Commerce and have been helping companies
navigate some of the regulatory and political risks
that they encounter when they enter emerging economies.
I wrote my thesis on Walmart's experience
entering South Africa and one of
the regulatory experiences that they encountered
that's pretty well documented was on competition.
Specifically, issues around labor, practices, and policies,
and so that's the kind of work
that we really do at the U.S. Chamber.
We help to support businesses in terms of identifying
some of the strategic risks that they might encounter
when they enter markets
but then also work to connect them
to the wide range of tools that exist
within federal government that's already been discussed,
some that are at the EXIM Bank,
the U.S. African Development Foundation if needed,
but also tapping into the resources
that exist within governments, African governments,
that also help to promote exports and imports and to ensure
that companies get access to the resources that they need
once they've entered those markets.
I look forward to conversations,
further dialogue about how our members which
basically represent three million companies,
we are a fully private sector,
we are a member-based organization,
we have a 300 million or so budget and around the world,
whether it's in Africa or here in the U.S.,
we help to protect the interest of business
and then we also in instances where needed,
advocate on behalf of the business sector
to promote trade and investment.
At the U.S. African Business Center,
we are the preeminent vehicle that's a private sector entity
promoting trade and investment across the continent.
Our members see enormous potential on the continent
and have a very long term and strategic approach
to how they look at the markets across the continent.
We're tracking many of the issues
that were highlighted by the last presenter
in terms of the African Continental Free Trade Agreement,
but also efforts that are underway here in the U.S.
in terms of consolidating some of the tools
that exist within government
such as through the BUILD Act which is looking at
financing and consolidating some of those tools that
currently exist in multiple agencies
and making sure that we're unlocking the financial assets
and resources that could assist private sector
and being more strategic in how they enter markets.
- Thank you, Brionne, it's quite interesting.
I've been given the challenge of being both
a moderator and also a pre-presenter,
so I'll try to do as best I can to manage those two.
From my perspective, about six years ago,
what was really exciting as an opportunity
was looking at global remittances
and trying to think about how do you connect
remittances to develop and finance,
particularly how do you connect
what people are sending home with the productive sector?
What we found was that you basically need to tranche out
those flows into two categories,
the professional diaspora and in migrant workers.
In cases where, parts of Africa where
the majority of the remittances
are coming from professional diaspora,
i.e. people who will rescind to grow, to study,
have gotten good jobs or sending money
back to their relatives for fees,
school fees, pharmaceuticals, et cetera,
and also building property,
those individuals are treated in a very special category
when it comes to regulatory context
in the country in which they live.
Migrant workers, which is much more of a
Asian, Germaine issue are treated also
in a very different way and therefore
how you treat those flows and how you connect those flows
and the channels that you use to connect those flows
to the productive sector are very, very different.
The third element that we discovered was the use
of crowdfunding or the phenomenon of crowdfunding
as a way of allowing all diasporans to participate,
whether they're professionals
or whether they're migrant workers,
whether they're retail investors unsophisticated in finance
or whether they are Wall Street traders,
and we discovered a wide array of tools
that could be used to make that connection.
I'm not gonna spend too much time on that,
but I'm happy to speak about some of the details
of what we've learned and we've learned a lot
on this subject over the past six years
and we're working with the African Development Bank,
with the Asian Development Bank, and with USAID
to share our experience in that field.
I wanna switch back to my moderator role.
What I'd like to do is instead of having sort of this
rotational thing, I'd like to open up
to a sort of a conversation on the issue
so that we get a lot more input from everybody.
There's a lot to cover, clearly.
What I'd like to do is first talk about a transaction,
a typical transaction, particularly one of your more
not necessarily the most successful one,
but one that's most typical to what your organizations offer
and walk us through where does it come from,
what does it focus on, how is it put together,
what are the challenges both here from a policy standpoint
and then there from a regulatory and reality standpoint?
I wanna start with you, Uduak.
Can you talk about export finance, a particular transaction,
choose whatever field you want, agriculture,
health care, what have you, and let's walk us through.
I'm gonna constrain you,
I'm gonna give you no more than two to three minutes.
I'd like you, the two of you,
to also chime in on some of the key aspects.
- Sure, I would love to do that.
I'll talk about power
since that's something that I focus on,
a large infrastructure project, right,
a power project say a 50 megawatt,
let's use renewable energy, so a solar farm in West Africa.
What I find with these transactions,
especially transactions that I'm seeing
coming from the continent versus other places
within the world is that you,
I get pitched a lot of deals that are much larger,
if I could say very diplomatically,
than they actually need to be.
I think working with developers
and having them understand that the lender pitch
is very different from the equity pitch, right?
Because they come to me, they say
"Oh we'll have"-- - What does that mean?
What is equity pitch and-- - Yeah, so they'll come to me
and say "The ROI on this particular investment is"--
- ROI standing for return on investment.
- Return on investment, thank you,
"For this particular investment is 15 to 22%"
or they give me all of these stats,
how much money I can make, and really as a lender,
lenders don't participate in the upside.
We just want our debt to be repaid, right?
And we just want to make sure that the project can be built,
can be implemented, it can be operated,
and that we can be repaid according to the schedule.
The challenge in working with developers and helping them
to know how to approach the lender institution,
what lenders are looking at, it's very different from what
venture capitalists or private equity
is looking at is very important.
With a lot of projects that I see
that come in from the continent,
a lot of early stage work is needed
and so I've been working within the bank
and we've been having conversations
as to how can we start to engage our transactions very early
while developers are really still putting things together?
When you talk about really large infrastructure projects,
they could be five to 10 years in the making
before they even get to me,
a project that can be financed, that's bankable.
A lot of work has gone into that.
What I've noticed on the continent
is that engagement a little bit earlier
really helps bring the project together
because a lot of times, the governments are involved
in the project because you're talking about power,
there's a dearth of power, power is very strategic,
hence the government is very focused on it.
A lot of times, the off taker or,
so if you have a generating plant
that's going to sell energy,
it's usually going to sell energy to a utility,
a utility is usually nationally owned,
so the government is sitting behind the utility.
Utility is probably operating in the red, many utilities do,
so they will require the support of the government,
so coming in as a lender and talking to
the federal government early and letting them know
what will be required in this documentation
in order to entice international lenders
to come to the table has been very key
in helping some of these projects come together,
so that's something that we've been doing.
- You're suggesting that projects can either
come from the continent or come from the U.S.
but you wanna get involved in the project preparation,
i.e. in the project structuring in of itself.
Is that because it's driven by constraints
within your organization as to how you make decisions
on funding or is that,
what's driving your need to get involved early on?
- It's really the project structure.
For the larger infrastructure projects,
they usually come in on a project finance project.
What project finance is in a very short nutshell,
in a nutshell is you're developing
a special purpose vehicle, an SPV,
to own an asset, it's a green field asset so
it doesn't exist, it doesn't currently have any cash flow,
but yet you want to borrow money from me
to build it and to operate it.
It's very different from coming in
and financing a business that has been in existence
for the last 10 years, 20 years
that has operating revenue that's profitable.
That's easy for me to underwrite,
and we underwrite those types of loans as well,
but the infrastructure projects,
they come in on a project finance basis
and so a lot is involved there and so there's a lot of,
there are a lot of agreements that need to be in place,
there are a lot of terms and conditions
that need to be factored into these agreements
to get us comfortable as international lenders,
and so when we come to the table early
before these agreements are signed,
we can ensure that this project,
once all of the facets are put together,
will be bankable, will be commercially reasonable.
- What are the key success factors of a large project
that you've taken in that you've successfully financed?
- I would say first of all, the project just,
it fits within the environment, right?
If you talk about renewable, let's use that as an example,
we like to see projects come in
that have been tendered through an official process.
- [Eric] Transparency.
- Transparency, so we do see sole source projects
where there's only one developer has been considered,
one sponsor has been considered,
they have been awarded a contract
and those projects can go through successfully.
Sometimes those projects have issues
because it was a bilateral negotiation,
you have a change of administration,
and all of a sudden the contracts are no longer valued
or don't want to be honored, so transparency is very key.
I'd like to see that the project can be built
because that's key, that's how I'm gonna get repaid,
is the project is actually built
and it's built on time and built on budget.
I need a contractor who can actually build it
who's done it in that environment,
who's done it in that environment or a similar environment,
who's used that technology, and also has the pockets
to stand behind the obligations of building it.
One of the challenges that I've seen on the continent
is that a local developer will come in
and not have the experience of implementing a project
and the first thing that I do is try and suggest
or to the extent that I can, is match make,
have you considered working with an international developer
who has this experience that can help
you implement this project?
Usually it's not very tasteful because when you JV like that
and you bring, joint venture, and you bring another party
to the table that's more experienced,
they're gonna want a cut, a large cut of the deal,
and usually the local developer doesn't wanna provide that.
- But that's a precondition to getting financed from you.
- You have to have the experience,
you have to demonstrate that you can build it
and that it will be built successfully
and that you can operate it.
- I'm assuming here that in addition to providing financing,
you do match making, and the idea is that if you find
a prospective joint venture entity
that adds to the credibility of the project
which facilitates the financing on your end.
- Yeah, I just wanna be clear.
Our official role is not to do the match making.
If we can, we try, and we make suggestions,
but that's really what brings the strength
to the transaction, is the sponsor, the development team,
what we call the EPC,
the engineering, procurement, and contracting.
Having that experience to actually build the thing,
make sure that it works so that
lenders will come to the table,
wanna finance it because they know
that they're gonna get repaid.
- Got it.
Tom, your involvement with Power Africa
and your interaction with EXIM Bank,
can you talk about that?
- We haven't worked directly with EXIM Bank but there are,
on that continuum of finance,
we're probably at the very beginning
where we provide seed capital
and EXIM Bank is at the, somewhat at the other end
where they're doing major projects.
- [Eric] What is the nature of the seed capital
that you're offering?
- I mentioned one where we do 50% grant
and 50% convertible loans, but generally we give,
we start with a grant and what we do,
I can walk through it very quickly,
like a process for the off-grid energy projects.
What we do is,
we do what we call Off-Grid Challenge,
so we advertise in a country,
we solicit for proposals and projects,
then we have a panel of outside judges
as well as people within USADF that score those,
review those, and then we do a selection
depending on how much,
what our budget is for that country,
sometimes three, sometimes five projects,
roughly at about $100,000 each.
What we do is, an example would be,
I'm thinking of a GVE in the Niger Delta in Nigeria.
Part of the key thing is identifying
these projects and these entrepreneurs.
They were this small organization that had done
a certain amount of off-grid energy work
in the solar field, but not a real lot.
We funded them to do a micro mini grid in a rural community
of about 100 households.
In effect, what they did is they became a mini utility,
but they showed and demonstrated that that model worked
and then they've actually been able
to expand significantly since then.
I think they're, at this point they have over
almost two million dollars in financing,
about 1.8 million in financing
where they've expanded in different states.
We do that identification, we have a local partner
that works with the organizations for implementation
to support them so that they are able to,
when they run into a problem
or as they go through the process, they can do that.
We look for very strong financial systems
so they're able to report well and track their own finances.
You asked about the challenges.
I think for our organization,
those challenges that we see with the organization,
first of all are the key success factors
maybe we would say is that,
the first one would be project design.
You have to have a very good project design.
If you don't have one, that can be fixed but--
- [Eric] Do you help with that?
- We do a limited amount of help with that I would say.
That would be kind of in a pre-application stage.
- [Eric] Do you point to a network of people
who can provide that kind of service?
- We often do that.
What we do find is we get, we do get
a great excess of well designed projects.
We focus on those and secondly, management.
The management of the organization to make this work,
a well designed project without good management
is not gonna work very well.
We support that in certain ways,
like we build capacity through training
and also through, especially through the financial systems.
Then I think thirdly key success factor
is that they have a vision
and a profitable plan for expansion and scalability.
Where are they going once they've done this
and how are they gonna profitably expand?
What's their vision for the next
two years, three years, five years?
I think with those what we've found is we've had
really good success with implementing
these kind of projects.
- [Eric] Great, Brionne you wanna chime in on your
experience and challenges? - Sure, let me say that the
U.S. Chamber of Commerce is not
directly involved in deal structuring,
but based on my experience in Power Africa
and also some of the well known challenges
as investors enter markets, one of the typical difficulties
that our members encounter is working with officials
that may not have familiarity
with these very complex financial transactions.
For example, with the Corbetti Power Project in Ethiopia,
a significant renewable energy project
with Power Africa's support,
it took well longer than anticipated
to work with government officials that really
many of whom don't even have their own bank account.
Some of the conversations that we're having here
in terms of how do you structure debt and equity
and how do you unlock the potential
that exists in a renewable power project,
it took a long time for government officials,
USAID that is spear heading some of that work
in Ethiopia to really walk the
government officials through that process.
Something that our members also look for
when they're considering investments,
apart from the business conducive environment
that has already been mentioned,
is also whether or not they'll be repaid.
Getting their capital out of the market
is another key criteria.
That's also an issue that I think a lot of our members
have encountered where they then seek support from
an organization like the Chamber to access the regulatory
tools and to get to the right people to get their finances
get repaid and also get issues that they might encounter
from a regulatory standpoint addressed.
- Chiming in from the diaspora angle,
what we've seen particularly in the case of off-grid,
and this is in the UK, unfortunately not in the U.S.,
we're DFID which is the equivalent
of the U.S. Agency for International Development,
has partnered with local crowdfunding platforms
like Lin-duh-han and Ethex, E-T-H-E-X,
to provide short term loans to the crowds,
i.e. retail investors including the diaspora to finance
companies that provide off-grid technologies in Africa.
They recently had a $20 million program
which involves partial guarantees of those loans
and they've been extremely successful.
Azuri Technologies, which is one of the providers,
was able to raise about 1.7 million pounds
over the space of two months
through crowdfunding technology in order to match
development capital provided by DFID.
Those are the kind of innovations that you're seeing
in terms of channeling funding from the retail,
from the diaspora that are well-structured, transparent,
or the issues that you mentioned,
something that could be quite transformative
if it's brought into the U.S., into the U.S. context.
I'd like to shift a little bit and talk about
some of the macro issues that are going on in Africa
and how you perceive that either as an opportunity,
as a threat, or else.
We're seeing what's called devolution,
i.e. where the central federal government
or the central government is pushing authority
both in terms of project selection
and in terms of financing to the municipalities.
We see it in Nigeria with Abuja,
we're seeing it in Kenya with the province of Nairobi,
and McKinsey itself, McKinsey Africa came up with a report
that suggests two things.
One, that investment opportunities are more focused
on municipalities, i.e. cities, and not necessarily states.
Then number two, that the future that we're gonna see
in Africa is the rapid growth of mega cities, that the
provinces around Nairobi, around Abuja, and in Ethiopia
area basically gonna be so big
that those are gonna be the major sources of growth.
How do you perceive that?
Where do you see potential opportunities there
and how would you structure your activities
in relation to that evolution?
Uduak, sorry.
- All right, good.
That's a very interesting trend.
There's one comment that I'd like to make
before I answer that and that is
EXIM Bank is actually, where I sit,
I focus a lot on the larger infrastructure projects.
We also have other products within the bank
that are more short term in nature.
What I do is long term, sometimes up to 18 year financing.
We do have short term projects
that are U.S. exporter facing,
so if you are a U.S. exporter
and you're exporting into the African market,
we do have financial products for you as well,
mostly in the form of working capital guarantees,
receivables insurance, so those products are available
as well as when you talk about the continuum of financing.
With regard to Eric's question about devolution
and municipalities and larger mega cities,
one of the places where I personally experience this
is actually in India.
When we first started financing
renewable energy projects in India,
it was really on the national level
in terms of the government support.
As the program continued to be, it continued to evolve,
that would spread out to the municipality level
and I can be honest with you from my personal experience,
it was a bit, the credit was a bit more
difficult to underwrite.
But they are moving forward,
that program generally has its challenges,
and I don't wanna focus on that here,
we're focused on Africa,
but it is a bit more challenging
because you don't have the sovereign,
you don't have the full faith in credit of the nation
sitting behind whatever obligations
that you are actually underwriting.
The projects that we tend to work on
when we see the large infrastructure projects,
they're usually located, and because of the nature,
right, it's very industrial,
so they're usually located in a remote area,
but they serve, they're situated to serve
obviously the major clusters of population.
That power will make it to Accra, will make it to Lagos,
will make it to Abuja, all of those major cities
but the one thing to consider there within that paradigm
is how does it make it there?
That's the grid, right?
That's one of the issues where we see is a problem
in terms of implementing these larger power projects is
it can, the grid, is the gris, is it sustainable?
Especially with renewable power
which tends to be intermittent power,
you don't get it 24 hours a day, it's not stable,
it's not slowed unless you have battery
or some other supplementary power,
and so can the grid be stable with the renewable power?
Can the grid support all of this new power
coming onto the grid and obviously transmission
and distribution is, you're talking about
very large networks here in the U.S.
If you just drive down the street
and take a look at the power lines,
that's a lot of infrastructure.
It takes a lot of time to build that stuff.
I sat on a panel once where someone talked about
the amount of money that it would take
to build out to the grid to where it needs to be
and I think it was hundreds of billions of dollars.
We can try and get the power projects built
which is challenging, but you also have to have
the supporting infrastructure to do that.
- Tom, you, I want you to chime on this question but you,
I'd like for you to also sort of
plug in the youth entrepreneurship element.
When you talk about mega cities,
you're potentially talking about youth employment challenges
and can you try to talk about what you guys are doing
in that space and what does it mean in this new environment?
- Yeah, it's a really, really good question.
I think devolution works both ways.
We've seen in Kenya that they've actually
pushed money out to the counties,
but as far as the rise of mega city goes,
that's happened and is happening.
Lagos is one of the largest cities in the world,
what I call the wonderful magnificent chaos
of a place like that.
Accra, we were just there, Michelle and I recently,
I had an experience where I arrived
at the edge of town just at dark,
thinking oh we're getting back to where we're going early,
and it took us three hours to get across town.
But that's important because you know, yes,
it's a concentration of resources,
it's a concentration of startup businesses and innovation,
and it's a concentration of,
all kinds of things are there
that you're really not gonna get in the rural areas.
What we do see then is, like with the youth entrepreneurs,
the real innovation we're finding is
generally in a place like Nairobi, in a place like Lagos.
Then they're actually taking those innovations
and applying those to rural areas
and we're seeing that with off-grid energy,
but we're seeing that with also our youth entrepreneurs.
One example, Brenda Katsewigye who is in Kampala,
we had funded her, she was doing a small,
what do they call, recycling, plastic recycling.
She actually then identified that,
she found that she was able to actually make eye glasses
from the plastic that she'd recycled and saw this need
and then actually has been producing those
and selling those through school.
She actually took one innovation
and then moved it into another area,
and so that includes rural areas where
sometimes they'll do testing in a school and find that
the parents never knew that the children
actually needed eye glasses and it can really change things,
and these are very low cost.
She's made a very successful business out of that.
That would be one example.
It is true that mega cities and the concentration,
and that's where you're gonna find the innovation
and that's where you're gonna find kind of the excitement
and what's going on, and that's where the,
I'm not saying that's where the youth wanna be,
but that's where we often identify
these young entrepreneurs,
but they're also moving those innovations
to the rural areas.
- [Eric] Brionne, wanna chime in?
- Sure, so I would just say that in terms of
the rapid moves that we're seeing towards devolution that
governments are also looking at their development
trajectories through the lens of job creation.
They're viewing the private sector
as a partner in creating jobs.
As a result, the opportunities
that are offered through devolution
also create new opportunities that previously hadn't emerged
in terms of reaching rural or remote populations.
I think businesses are coming up with creative models
to reach some of those rural populations and so
there are also I think some
complex regulatory challenges that also emerge,
if now you're no longer negotiating
just with federal government,
but you're negotiating with municipal government
and you have to now pay taxes at multiple levels.
That dynamic is also creating new regulatory challenges
I think for businesses that are seeking
to navigate these contexts.
There are actually, I think that presents
a really great business opportunity.
New organizations have been created
to help companies also figure out
how to be strategic as they enter.
One that comes to mind is an organization
called Fraym, F-R-A-Y-M,
which has actually pulled together
this great database of data that had in the past
been used primarily for health and educational purposes,
but use that data to actually identify where are
the highest potential for say a product that might be
a product that Proctor & Gamble might be producing,
a detergent or something,
they may look at where is the most likely demographic
of individuals located from a
kilometer to kilometer square area
to target the delivery of a product
in an area where it's most likely to be profitable.
You're seeing also I think
from the standpoint of innovation,
new sources of data being tapped to kind of create
and sort of surface these new business opportunities
that help businesses look through the lens of these markets
that are more challenging to navigate
or where you don't have as much data
that's readily accessible
a little bit more accessible and available.
I think that that's a trend that we're gonna continue to see
and then the other thing that I will just mention
in terms of innovation and jobs creation
is that you're also seeing companies
pioneering new approaches to looking at how,
for example, assist rural companies get access
to the internet, for example,
through the creation of Zoom, you know,
something that's like suspended in the air
that actually helps remote populations
get access to internet, and that also unlocks
a whole new potential that's created by the digital economy
that Microsoft, Facebook, and a number of other groups
are pioneering, or companies are pioneering.
I think that's also an opportunity
and then a third trend I would elaborate on
is just the public-private partnerships potential there.
UPS for example, in terms of delivery
of humanitarian assistance has partnered with companies
to use drones to actually deliver
health goods to remote communities.
I think that these, the devolution and what you're seeing
in terms of reaching more remote populations
is also creating and exposing new business opportunities
and forcing the development of new business models.
- Great.
I wanna end with one question before we go to lunch
which I see very hungry eyes there.
China, China clearly has made inroads into Africa
both at the national level and now at the municipal level
and even at the private sector level
where they're providing a whole range of services
and sources of finance, so retail finance,
municipal finance, as well as national finance.
Even Power Africa, when you look at the actual numbers
in the context of China's contributions, it's challenging.
Can you speak to China, its role, how are you perceiving it,
and how are you addressing it from your perspective?
- Well yeah, China's always the one topic that comes up
when you talk about working in Africa,
especially these bigger infrastructure projects.
I can only speak anecdotally from what I've seen,
what I've seen on my personal travels
and what I've seen in meetings
talking with developers, government officials.
I'm sure many of the projects are built well
and are delivering the capacity, the energy,
or whatever it is they're supposed to deliver,
but there are a number of projects that don't.
Recently I was in Nigeria and if you fly into
the International Murtala Muhammed Airport,
there's a large building standing right there
and it's been there for a year and it has not opened yet.
There are lots of issues that,
in working with Chinese contractors
but I think you need to do your due diligence
because a lot of projects are going forward,
a lot of projects are working,
but you can't be attracted by a low,
just strictly a low price.
We have to make sure that the project can be implemented
because at the end of the day, you're gonna waste more money
chasing Chinese money if you're not bringing
the right parties to the table.
- Okay, Tom?
- I think I'd make a couple comments there.
One, clearly we need to be aware that China
is being very strategic in their investments
and what they're doing and I think it's a challenge to us,
the U.S. and others, to be strategic as well
and to be able to do that in the right way.
In the off-grid energy field, we actually have,
there's American companies that compete
and that have better quality and compete on price
in things like batteries, connectors, inverters,
and things like that, on commodities not so much.
One of the things that we've been battling actually
in off-grid energy is the awareness of solar
has a very negative perception
in a lot of rural places in Africa because
the products that have come from China are very low quality,
very cheap, they've got them out there,
and then they just tend to not work and
actually they've created a very bad impression on solar,
so we've had to overcome that in a lot of ways
with higher quality products and actually things that work
and we've found with some of our projects,
we have a 99.9% uptime, you know,
a solar mini grid with proper batteries
which is better than the national grid
by a factor of two or three.
I guess those are the two things I can point out.
- [Eric] Brionne.
- Sure, so many of our members are facing
an enormous degree of competition from Chinese companies,
there's no question that American companies
have been well behind the clip that we've seen
in terms of the pace of Chinese investment.
I think a lot of that is helped by state sponsored support,
particularly in the infrastructure space if you look at
China's investments, $50 billion I think in 2014
through state sponsored financing vehicles that
really enable Chinese companies to compete for deals that
are government procurements that American investors,
for a variety of reasons, are unable to compete with,
just on the financing alone.
Then when you compound that with the fact
that the Chinese government also sees Africa
through the lens of this strategic
longterm engagement and mineral extraction
and the fact that I think for a long time,
American investors have been more risk adverse,
they also face stricter compliance
around Foreign Corrupt Practices Act
and then add to that also the fact that on cost,
American companies are also not quite as competitive.
I think that this is also why
the Chamber supports initiatives
like the global procurement initiative
which encourages countries and governments
to look at best value as opposed to best price.
Those kinds of initiatives really
I think will change the trajectory
along with some of the other reforms
that are being currently considered
through legislative proposals around financing,
the ease of accessing the tools available
through EXIM, OPEC, and other agencies.
Then also I think that we really do have an important hurdle
in terms of helping to support American companies
to understand the longterm value
and the benefits and the return on equity and investment
that exist in Africa's growth markets.
We've put forward a set of recommendations at the Chamber
to the Trump administration looking at
a wide range of different types of policy interventions
that could be helpful and supportive
in terms of growing American companies' presence
on the continent, but also we're seeing
that through direct experience,
that governments have had working with Chinese companies,
that there's also a preference
to work with American companies
and we're tapping into that as well.
- Just to add on to that,
I think that definitely does exist,
that I do see a preference to work with American companies,
I do see that in many different sectors,
but I think the lure of the low price is the issue.
One of the things that was mentioned earlier,
and one of the things that we're facing
that we don't have an answer to is
the way we operate as an export credit agency,
we've signed an agreement called the OECD arrangement,
and what it does in many other developed country,
export credit agencies have signed that agreement,
and under that agreement it provides for terms
and conditions for which you can offer your financing.
It also provides for minimum pricing so that
exports are competing in terms of price and quality
and not necessarily money being thrown at the project
or at the exports from the state sponsored entity.
So we've signed it,
and many in the European Union have signed it,
obviously China has not signed it,
and that's something, Russians have not signed it,
and that's something that we deal with every day.
They're able to do things and offer pricing that
we cannot offer because we have signed onto this agreement.
- Great, on that note what I'd like to do
in the interest of time is sort of open it up for
how many questions ...
- [Man] Couple of questions.
- Couple of questions and then we can wrap up before lunch.
Could you please identify yourself
and your organization before you ask the question?
Then if anybody on the panel
that you're directing your question to.
Thank you.
- [Joshua] Joshua Abraham with the Smith School.
The question is to the whole panel.
How do you see the Trump administration
and comments on Twitter that he makes about Africa
may affect decisions of these countries making business,
doing business with the U.S. compared to China
who will probably will treat them as equals?
Thank you.
- We'll take a couple and we'll, gonna ...
Go ahead.
- Oh, sure.
Good morning, Andrew Sanchez,
I'm from George Mason University.
The question I do have, a lot of the speakers before
talked a lot about revenue and debt.
Specifically for you, Ms. Essien,
I'm sorry if I got the name wrong,
but as a lender you talk about
getting your money back obviously,
have you seen any of the issues
that like the World Bank mentioned about debt with,
the whole issue with debt in Africa specifically?
- Okay we'll take those two questions.
Wanna start with the second one first or?
- Oh sure, I'd be happy to.
I'm glad that you did ask that question,
thank you for that question because
actually there were a lot of interesting things
in that presentation and one of them was
sustainable debt and as I laid out before,
especially when you're talking about energy projects,
energy drives the economy.
Businesses need cheap, reliable energy
in order to manufacture you've gotta run that engine,
so you really need that power and usually power
that comes from the grid versus diesel power,
but one of the things that we're seeing is a lot of times
one of the stakeholders in the structure
of the transaction is the utility,
the utility is not credit worthy.
So you look for state support.
One of the challenges that we're seeing these days is that
federal governments, governments are unable because
they may have signed on to some world bank program,
they're unable to stand behind the obligations
of the utility because that is contingent debt
that you have to disclose on your balance sheet
and you get a hit for that.
That is a challenge that we're seeing nowadays and
we have to be more innovative to come up with a structure
to ensure repayment.
One thing that I didn't talk about earlier is that
as an ECA, we're not grant making,
we're not development finance institutions,
there are a lot of different types of institutions
that sit along the continuum of finance.
We have a mandate for a reasonable assurance of repayment
so we are looking at credit worthy transactions,
we do want to get paid, we are guardians
of U.S. taxpayer dollars because
that's where we're dispersing from.
We have to come up with these structures
to make these deals credit worthy without,
in some cases, having the obligations,
the sovereign standing behind the obligations of the project
or just generally speaking.
One of the things that we've done is just kind of
limit those obligations to certain events
and sometimes that is more feasible,
that's more palatable, that can be accepted
and so that's one of the things that we've done,
but it has been very challenging
when you're talking about debt levels.
I think what was reported earlier, 70% debt levels
and lots of floats on the Eurobond market and
current payments that are coming due
and how will those payments being made,
so those are real issues.
- Any other comments on that from the rest,
from the other panelists? - Not on that.
- Not on that. - I can speak
to the first questions.
- Yeah so the second question was about the Trump effect.
Wanna focus on that?
- Everyone's looking to me.
(laughing)
I think I mentioned Trump first, so I'm happy to.
There's no question that many of the negative comments
that had been made as well as the signals
that have been said have not been helpful.
Now I do think that it's important though to look at,
I think it's still early days in some respects because
if you look historically at the ways in which
presidents have engaged the continent,
it's often in the second administration, a second term.
In some ways there's still a lot on the table,
so Secretary Ross, the head of the commerce department
will be headed to Africa at the end of June, early July,
and will be visiting Kenya, Cote d'Ivoire, Ethiopia,
and I'm missing a country. - Ghana.
- Ghana, thank you.
There will be I think quite a bit
in terms of commercial engagement.
I think it's also important to recognize
in even the commercial space,
some of the architecture of President Obama's
past initiatives have still remained in place.
Power Africa is one of them.
But then also the president's advisory council
on doing business in Africa
which is the council under which Secretary Ross
will be taking his upcoming fact finding trip.
I think also he has continued to keep a clip in terms of
assessing what are the major barriers in terms of,
and for all of you who are in the audience,
I encourage you to take a look at the report
which came out late last year.
It has nine different dimensions that were,
the council's recommendation,
or the councils actually identified obstacles to working
in Africa and now a set of recommendations is emerging.
I think we still have to see what the impact might be.
Obviously from a diplomatic standpoint,
it hasn't been helpful in terms of the overall strategy
and just the appreciation of the continent as a partner.
But I think there's also something
that is somewhat palatable in the Trump messaging
around getting the best deal.
Oddly in my anecdotal conversations
with Africans that I speak with,
there's something around kind of this notion
about whether or not there can be negotiations
under which Africa stands to get a better deal.
The concept of America first is certainly not new.
China has been looking at its approach with Africa
as China first and it's time I think
that Africans also look at their countries as Africa first.
There will be I think still discussions under way
and we're closely tracking that
and still look to what might emerge from the upcoming trip
and our members are quite active and engaging
and trying to figure out where there are opportunities.
- Thank you.
From the diaspora standpoint, on a lighter note,
I think the response is fairly evident
in the Black Panther movie gross box office numbers.
On that note, I wanna thank the panelists.
I think this has been an incredible contribution discussion
and also the Smith School, thank you.
(audience applauds)
-------------------------------------------
Un tempo per tornare: Chris incontra Scott - Duration: 3:41.
For more infomation >> Un tempo per tornare: Chris incontra Scott - Duration: 3:41. -------------------------------------------
SỐ CHUẨN 24H - soi cầu chốt số 8/6 | ĂN RỰC RỠ 4 NHÁY LÔ | TIẾP TỤC SIÊU DỰ ĐOÁN - Duration: 12:47.
For more infomation >> SỐ CHUẨN 24H - soi cầu chốt số 8/6 | ĂN RỰC RỠ 4 NHÁY LÔ | TIẾP TỤC SIÊU DỰ ĐOÁN - Duration: 12:47. -------------------------------------------
이스라엘은 어떻게 '언터처블'이 됐나? / korean army 24h - Duration: 14:12.
For more infomation >> 이스라엘은 어떻게 '언터처블'이 됐나? / korean army 24h - Duration: 14:12. -------------------------------------------
チキンラーメン・ひよこちゃん 宣伝活動に疲れて溶ける(J-CASTニュース) - Duration: 3:23.
For more infomation >> チキンラーメン・ひよこちゃん 宣伝活動に疲れて溶ける(J-CASTニュース) - Duration: 3:23. -------------------------------------------
「Nightcore」→ Thriller ✗ Billie Jean ✗ Beat it ✗ Bad and MORE (Switching Vocals / Jared Halley Cover) - Duration: 5:28.
Nightcore - Michael Jackson Mashup (subtitles in video)
-------------------------------------------
House Bill 1184 - GEC or Associate Degree Pathways - Wytheville CC Dual Enrollment - Duration: 5:05.
Okay. The next question is that how can
dual enrollment students not only receive
dual enrollment credit, but what can they
do towards earning a possible general
education certificate or even an
associate's degree concurrent with high
school work? And in Virginia, House Bill
1184 was established most recently --
roughly about five or six years ago
which gives the students --
the dual enrollment students -- the option of earning
one or both components as part of their
dual enrollment experience. Of course,
the first would be the general education
certificate, which has 33 credits in the
Virginia Community College System and the
associate's degree -- and students have the
option of either taking the general
studies pathway or the science pathway
which will be 61 credits. The class
coverage on what is covered by the
school system and what is not really
largely depends and varies from school
system to school system. Most do require
financial responsibility for any
coursework taken at WCC not needed for
their respective high school diploma and
we've established pathways to help
navigate that process. The first thing
that students will need to do is they
will need to formerly complete a
declaration of intent form. This can be
done either with myself or with their
guidance counselor indicating the
program of interest.
The associate's degree goes over
the individual classes needed. There's
the College Success Skills, the English
111 and 112, the composition classes, as
well as the literatures. Two college-level
math classes. Two biology or two chemistry
classes or anatomy that can also count
as well. Two history classes, they must be
Western Civilization or U.S. History. Four
social science classes and I've given
examples there either in economics,
geography, history, psychology or
sociology. One humanities elective, and I've
also given those prefixes as well. Art,
Film Appreciation, another Literature, a
Humanities, Philosophy or Religion class.
Two transfer electives which can be any
of the courses listed above. The
communications class. The ITE 115 class,
as well as a one credit health or physical
education. Credit by experience is
available for the bottom two classes if
students possess or earn Microsoft
Office Specialist certification and/or
CPR certification. Keep in mind that
these classes will not transfer on to a
four-year school if this choice is made.
For the associate's of Science, a lot of
the classes are the same with several
changes. There is one Literature
requirement, as opposed to two.
Specifically, there are math classes and
specifically, we look for more calculus
and more higher level math classes. Four
lab sciences. Only one history
requirement. Only two social science
requirements. Two STEM electives which can
consist of higher level math. It could be
engineering. It could be computer
programming or higher level biology
classes. One science without lab, which
can be a Biology 285 or a Natural
Science 150, Again, the communications
elective. The ITE 115. The humanities
elective as well as the health and
physical education which the difference
here is that the science degree requires
two credits.
And finally, the general education certificate,
which carries 33 credits, still carries
the College Success Skills. One English
Composition. One college level math. Two
lab sciences. Three social sciences and
two humanities, as well as the
communications elective which can be
used either as Dual Enrollment English
112 or communications. Students who do
receive one of the associate's degrees
automatically receive the GEC.
Now again, we strongly recommend taking
courses, especially the ones that are
through WCC, during the summer months to
balance out the main semester coursework.
Of course, it would be the College Success Skills,
the communications course, the health and
physical education, whether it's the one
or two credit option, the ITE 115 and
the humanities elective. Again, credit by
experience would be available for the
ITE as well as the health and
physical education credits.
-------------------------------------------
「Nightcore」→Pushed Down (Lyrics) - Duration: 3:08.
「Nightcore」→Pushed Down (Lyrics)
-------------------------------------------
Getting an $8k per Month Client For Your Digital Agency - Duration: 4:09.
hello all. Nick Calabro here with Calaboration and I want to just quickly
talk about a new client that we picked up at collaboration one of the largest I
mean well definitely the largest client that we have right now that we've just
landed paying approximately 8,000 dollars a month on retainer now I want
to talk about this right because first of all I want to let you know how you
can land clients like this right eight thousand dollars a month for one single
client is like more than people make in their lifetime in their entire full-time
jobs right so it sounds a lot better than it is obviously things are always
it going to be inflated and you know optically enhanced and whatnot but
essentially the big picture here is that this client their mortgage lender big
big mortgage company and the big thing is that they're doing a lot Ilan's a lot
of print media so what do I mean by that they're doing lawn signs they're doing
mailers they're doing you know Flyers brochures stuff like that so these
things collaborations handling them right collaborations doing the printing
collaborations doing the design work even the distributing and whatnot that
stuff and we've talked about this in previous videos takes up so much of your
budget okay if you're doing lawn signs right we do this with photo go campaigns
as well we do like the lawn signs and you know get-out-the-vote stuff those
things you'll go broke just sending out flyers and doing lawn signs that stuff
like that so that $8,000 honestly not so much half a company like at least a
quarter of that money is being spent directly on just our overhead like that
is being spent to the printers that is being sent to you know the post office
sending the stuff out distributing and whatnot and so that's like okay so
technically if we call all that stuff out what is collaboration actually
making all that what am I making off that as CEO of collaboration well
collaborations making maybe you know five six thousand dollars maybe about
fifty five hundred yeah fifty five hundred dollars a month on this client
because of all the printing that we're doing so are they still in $8,000 a
month client at that point well yes they are right because that money is going
through your company right so here's the really big thing to keep in mind when it
comes to a lot of these different services industries you want your ad
spend you want your all your overhead cost and everything you want that to be
going through the company don't say hey you guys put the bill for the ad spend
you guys take care of the distribution and whatnot and we'll just take care of
the design right because you want that money to go through your channel right
because that is still revenue for you even if it's not profit okay you still
want that money to go through your system right because now that turns from
a $5,000 a month client to an $8,000 a month client one of them sounds a lot
better one of them is much better for your business even though they're
technically the same right because the amount of money that you're actually
making off that client is about the same okay so bottom line here is just always
try to eat as much money as you can out of your potential clients because it's
better off in your hands and you can actually even charge more by managing it
right so like if you're brokering the distribution of these flyers and
brochures and signs and whatnot you can charge for that too okay like you can
charge for yeah we got it printed so here's like the at cost printing but
then here's the us going to the printers right like that is a cost that they will
pay for happily because I don't want to deal with it any of that stuff okay so
again the money's better off in your pocket
the money's better off going through your channels that way you can write it
off that way you can actually have the revenue present even if you are paying a
lot of overhead and essentially yeah just make more
money sounds easy right go do it I'm Nichola bro get to work
-------------------------------------------
'미운우리새끼' 태진아 우유콜라 라면 레시피 집 공개 "진아기획 소속연예인 태진아 노래모음 28곡"|K-News - Duration: 6:47.
For more infomation >> '미운우리새끼' 태진아 우유콜라 라면 레시피 집 공개 "진아기획 소속연예인 태진아 노래모음 28곡"|K-News - Duration: 6:47. -------------------------------------------
'슈가맨2' 콜라 박준희 김영완 김송 근황 공개 "결혼 남편 강원래 아들 강선"|K-News - Duration: 6:21.
For more infomation >> '슈가맨2' 콜라 박준희 김영완 김송 근황 공개 "결혼 남편 강원래 아들 강선"|K-News - Duration: 6:21. -------------------------------------------
This 30' House from Tiny Diamond Homes Is a "Brilliant" Gem - Duration: 2:53.
For more infomation >> This 30' House from Tiny Diamond Homes Is a "Brilliant" Gem - Duration: 2:53. -------------------------------------------
The Amazing World of Gumball - Lunch Song (CZ) - Duration: 0:17.
♪ Uh, Dad is babysit us, ♪
♪ I can eat what I like. ♪
♪ Today I will choose myself, ♪
♪ how I avoid hungry. ♪
♪ I'm going to put chocolate to the bread and the piece of ham, huh
♪ ketchup with a syrup to add a taste. ♪
-------------------------------------------
Smart Forfour 52 KW business solution - Duration: 0:54.
For more infomation >> Smart Forfour 52 KW business solution - Duration: 0:54. -------------------------------------------
《金家好媳婦》EP109 盧彥澤得知老婆黑歷史臉色大變 - Duration: 3:23.
For more infomation >> 《金家好媳婦》EP109 盧彥澤得知老婆黑歷史臉色大變 - Duration: 3:23. -------------------------------------------
敦馬宣布一視同仁給反對黨選區撥款,他竟還嫌三嫌四,給臉不要臉一開口又被網民屌到漏油活該 - Duration: 8:27.
For more infomation >> 敦馬宣布一視同仁給反對黨選區撥款,他竟還嫌三嫌四,給臉不要臉一開口又被網民屌到漏油活該 - Duration: 8:27. -------------------------------------------
Dr. Virginia Apgar: Google Celebrates The Anaesthesiologist's 109th Birthday With Doodle - Duration: 2:57.
Google Doodle honors Dr. Virginia Apgar, savior of endless infants.
Her test enables pick out newborns who can be having health problems.
At some point of the Nineteen Thirties and '40s, Dr. Virginia Apgar noticed a troubling
trend regarding newborns.
Even as the infant mortality charge within the US had declined, the charge of little
one deaths inside the first 24 hours after birth remained constant.
As an obstetric anesthesiologist, Apgar became capable of perceive physical characteristics
that might distinguish healthy newborns from those in problem.
Apgar's observations led to the development in 1952 of the Apgar score, a brief and handy
technique for at once comparing how nicely the new child weathered the birthing method,
in particular the consequences of obstetric anesthesia.
To honor Apgar's contribution to neonatology -- the medical care of new child infants -- Google
dedicated its Doodle Thursday to the physician on her 109th birthday.
Generally carried out one and five mins after delivery, the check assigns a score of zero
to 2 for each of five standards: look, pulse, grimace, activity and breathing (APGAR).
Ratings of 7 and higher are normally everyday, 4 to six fairly low, and 3 and lower are usually
regarded as severely low.
The test allows clinical employees decide whether a newborn wishes instant hospital
treatment.
The check unfold via US hospitals in the Nineteen Sixties, proving a useful dimension for quick
assessing a newborn's physical circumstance.
The approach is still used in hospitals all through the us.
Apgar graduated fourth in magnificence at Columbia college university of Physicians
and Surgeons in 1933, and in 1949 became the primary female named a complete professor
at the faculty.
In 1959, she embarked on a 2nd career, earning a master's diploma in Public fitness from
Johns Hopkins faculty of Hygiene and Public health.
Armed together with her new diploma, she went to work at the March of Dimes foundation,
directing research to save you and deal with birth defects.
She additionally posted greater than 60 scientific articles and numerous essays for newspapers
and magazines in the course of her profession.
Her 1972 book Is My Baby All Right?
Explains the causes and treatment of not unusual beginning defects and proposes precautions
to assist enhance the chances of getting a wholesome child.
Apgar died on the age of sixty five in 1974.
No comments:
Post a Comment