Thursday, June 7, 2018

Youtube daily report Jun 7 2018

Nightcore - Michael Jackson Mashup (subtitles in video)

For more infomation >> 「Nightcore」→ Thriller ✗ Billie Jean ✗ Beat it ✗ Bad and MORE (Switching Vocals / Jared Halley Cover) - Duration: 5:28.

-------------------------------------------

Gemma Galgani: "Progetti per l'estate? Mi auguro di trovare l'amore" | M.C.G.S - Duration: 2:16.

For more infomation >> Gemma Galgani: "Progetti per l'estate? Mi auguro di trovare l'amore" | M.C.G.S - Duration: 2:16.

-------------------------------------------

Volkswagen Golf Variant Connected Series 1.0TSI 115PK - Duration: 1:08.

For more infomation >> Volkswagen Golf Variant Connected Series 1.0TSI 115PK - Duration: 1:08.

-------------------------------------------

「Nightcore」→Pushed Down (Lyrics) - Duration: 3:08.

「Nightcore」→Pushed Down (Lyrics)

For more infomation >> 「Nightcore」→Pushed Down (Lyrics) - Duration: 3:08.

-------------------------------------------

Volkswagen Golf GTE DSG | NAVI | PAN DAK | 18 - Duration: 1:10.

For more infomation >> Volkswagen Golf GTE DSG | NAVI | PAN DAK | 18 - Duration: 1:10.

-------------------------------------------

Ben Going To The Zoo | Kindergarten Songs And Videos For Kids - Duration: 15:58.

What you want to do today?

Do you wanna go to the Zoo witn me

Yesssss

Let us all go to zoo together

Zoo together, zoo together

Let us all go to zoo together

And we can play all day

We're goin' to the zoo, zoo, zoo

How about you, you, you?

You can come too, too, too

We're goin' to the zoo, zoo, zoo

Yippee

See the elephant with the long trunk swingin'

Great big ears and a long trunk swingin'

Snuffin' up peanuts with a long trunk swingin'

And we can stay all day

We come to the zoo, zoo, zoo

How about you, you, you

You can join us too, too, too

We come to the zoo, zoo, zoo

Hurry..

See all the monkeys they're scritch-scritch scratchin'

Jumpin' around and scritch-scritch scratchin'

Hangin' by the long-tail (huff huff huff)

And we can stay all day

We come to the zoo, zoo, zoo

How about you, you, you

You can join us too, too, too

We come to the zoo, zoo, zoo

There's a big black bear he's a huff-puff-a-puffin'

His coat's too heavy he's a huff-puff-a-puffin'

Don't get too close the huff-puff-a-puffin'

Or you won't stay all day

We come to the zoo, zoo, zoo

How about you, you, you

You can join us too, too, too

We come to the zoo, zoo, zoo

All right

See the lion in the zoo go roar roar roarin

Walking all around and roar roar roarin

Shaking his tale and roar roar roarin

And we can stay all day

We come to the zoo, zoo, zoo

How about you, you, you

You can join us too, too, too

We come to the zoo, zoo, zoo

Well we stayed all day and I'm gettin' sleepy

Sittin' in the car gettin' sleep sleep sleepy

Home already gettin' sleep sleep sleepy

Cause we have stayed all day

We've been to the zoo zoo zoo

So have you you you

You can came too too too

We been to the zoo zoo zoo

Goodbye kids.

For more infomation >> Ben Going To The Zoo | Kindergarten Songs And Videos For Kids - Duration: 15:58.

-------------------------------------------

Gorgeous Beautiful Tiny Home for Sale Has Everything a Person Needs Except - Duration: 2:33.

Gorgeous Beautiful Tiny Home for Sale Has Everything a Person Needs Except

For more infomation >> Gorgeous Beautiful Tiny Home for Sale Has Everything a Person Needs Except - Duration: 2:33.

-------------------------------------------

«Alice Nevers» : Guillaume Carcaud, drôle de greffier - Duration: 4:55.

For more infomation >> «Alice Nevers» : Guillaume Carcaud, drôle de greffier - Duration: 4:55.

-------------------------------------------

'미운우리새끼' 태진아 우유콜라 라면 레시피 집 공개 "진아기획 소속연예인 태진아 노래모음 28곡"|K-News - Duration: 6:47.

For more infomation >> '미운우리새끼' 태진아 우유콜라 라면 레시피 집 공개 "진아기획 소속연예인 태진아 노래모음 28곡"|K-News - Duration: 6:47.

-------------------------------------------

'슈가맨2' 콜라 박준희 김영완 김송 근황 공개 "결혼 남편 강원래 아들 강선"|K-News - Duration: 6:21.

For more infomation >> '슈가맨2' 콜라 박준희 김영완 김송 근황 공개 "결혼 남편 강원래 아들 강선"|K-News - Duration: 6:21.

-------------------------------------------

BRAYNIACS - Bray x Masew (Share Sub Effect + Sóng Nhạc) Đen zZz - Duration: 3:24.

For more infomation >> BRAYNIACS - Bray x Masew (Share Sub Effect + Sóng Nhạc) Đen zZz - Duration: 3:24.

-------------------------------------------

Trang điểm đơn giản đi chơi | Simple Makeup Look | Lananguyenroxas - Duration: 15:32.

For more infomation >> Trang điểm đơn giản đi chơi | Simple Makeup Look | Lananguyenroxas - Duration: 15:32.

-------------------------------------------

벤츠, E300e 세계 최초 공개..친환경차 점유율 확대 시도 - Duration: 4:10.

For more infomation >> 벤츠, E300e 세계 최초 공개..친환경차 점유율 확대 시도 - Duration: 4:10.

-------------------------------------------

렉서스, 신형 ES 300h공개..하이브리드 시장 '공략' - Duration: 3:10.

For more infomation >> 렉서스, 신형 ES 300h공개..하이브리드 시장 '공략' - Duration: 3:10.

-------------------------------------------

기아차, 전기차 니로EV 공개..주행거리는 380km - Duration: 5:59.

For more infomation >> 기아차, 전기차 니로EV 공개..주행거리는 380km - Duration: 5:59.

-------------------------------------------

만트럭버스, 중형 트럭 TGL 아시아 최초 공개..현대차 마이티에 도전장 - Duration: 3:15.

For more infomation >> 만트럭버스, 중형 트럭 TGL 아시아 최초 공개..현대차 마이티에 도전장 - Duration: 3:15.

-------------------------------------------

르노삼성, QM3 S에디션·트위지 스페셜 모델 공개..'눈길' - Duration: 5:15.

For more infomation >> 르노삼성, QM3 S에디션·트위지 스페셜 모델 공개..'눈길' - Duration: 5:15.

-------------------------------------------

MAN WITH A MISSIONが本日6月7日に東京・東京スカイツリーにてライブイベント「『Chasing the Horizon』発売記念 ~『地平線ヲ追イカケロ』ミステリーツアー!~」を開催し - Duration: 1:25.

MAN WITH A MISSIONが本日6月7日に東京・東京スカイツリーにて イブイベント「『Chasing the Horizon』発売記念 ~『地平線ヲ追 カケロ』ミステリーツアー!~」を開催した

5thアルバム「Chasing the Horizon」のリリースを記念して行 れたこのイベントは、全国各地の集合場所からイベント会場までバスで移動すること以外 も開示されない、ミステリーツアー形式で開催された

バスツアーの目的地となったのは東京スカイツリーの地上350mにある展望デッキ。ラ ブは夜明けの時刻・朝4:20にスタートし、Jean-Ken Johnny(G, o, Raps)は「全国カラオ集マリノ皆様! 朝早クカラ、遠イトコロカラ、ヨウコ オ越シ下サイマシタ! 普段ハコンナ早イ時間ナンカニ起キテナイデショ!」と集まった 200人のファンに呼びかけ、バンドは「Take Me Under」でライブをスタ トさせた

ロックバンドが同所でライブを行うのはこれが初めて。特別なロケーションでのライブ 早朝にもかかわらず大きな盛り上がりを見せ、ラストナンバーの「Winding Ro d」を届けると、最後にJean-Ken Johnnyは「アリガトウ! マタスグニ 会イシマショウ!」と感謝の気持ちを伝えた

MAN WITH A MISSION「『Chasing the Horizon』 売記念 ~『地平線ヲ追イカケロ』ミステリーツアー!~」2018年6月7日 東京ス イツリー セットリスト01. Take Me Under02. Freak It feat.東京スカパラダイスオーケストラ03. Hey Now04. Dead End in Tokyo05. Chasing the Horizon06. M Hero07. Winding Road 関連する特集記事 MAN W TH A MISSION「Chasing the Horizon」インタビューP

For more infomation >> MAN WITH A MISSIONが本日6月7日に東京・東京スカイツリーにてライブイベント「『Chasing the Horizon』発売記念 ~『地平線ヲ追イカケロ』ミステリーツアー!~」を開催し - Duration: 1:25.

-------------------------------------------

Incredibles 2 Sneak Peek

For more infomation >> Incredibles 2 Sneak Peek

-------------------------------------------

2018 Smith School EMF: Antoinette Monsio Sayeh - Duration: 52:48.

- Thank you so much Dean Triantis

for that very, very kind introduction.

And thank you to you and your colleagues for inviting me

to join you at this important forum.

Good morning to everyone, very pleased to be here

with you this morning.

I'm sure we're all very pleased to see the focus on Africa

and certainly to have some Africa-like weather doesn't hurt

this morning after an interminable winter.

It's really an honor to be given this opportunity

to talk to you about the most recent macroeconomic

developments in sub-Saharan Africa,

to say a bit about the prospects for growth in the region.

And to speak a bit about the critical role of private

investments in enhancing them.

I always cherish the opportunities like this one

to engage with young professionals on sub-Saharan Africa.

It's a long way from where I was when I went

to graduate school in this country.

The interest you see among young people

about sub-Saharan Africa, as we've heard

from Dean Triantis and from Kislaya.

It's what will actually push institutions in this country

to do better, in terms of more work

and more exposure of their students to the region.

And so, every opportunity I get to help to push that forward

I do by engaging in discussions like this.

And most recently, I was at Harvard

at a ninth annual conference on Africa development that

students across five graduate schools at Harvard have

been putting together for the past nine years.

And it's really, a really great opportunity

to see what young people are thinking.

It's not a bad thing of course to engage with people

over the hill like myself.

So I'm not saying I only want to talk to young people.

So, I think reflecting what was really a noteworthy

evolution in the development finance landscape.

There's quite a big of focus these days on leveraging the

balance sheets of the multilateral development banks, MDBs,

and of development financial institutions, DFIs,

with private capital in support of the

sustainable development goals.

And there's much talk of the

role of blended finances, it's called.

That is, using official development assistance

to supplement the traditional DFI model of investing

on near market terms with concessional finance.

And some of my colleagues

at the Center For Global Development have been

in fact working on these issues

and initiatives lately as part of our

sustainable development finance program.

And there is now little dispute that high quality private

investment can indeed fuel growth

and that these initiatives

can be catalytic of such investments.

And all this is very good, but what I want to focus

on today are the conditions

under which these investments can materialize

and actually be most productive in unleashing growth.

And I want to situate this against the backdrop of what

has been weak economic growth performance in the region

over the past two years.

So the full title of my speech today is, in effect,

"Investment Fuels Growth, Leveraging is Impact on

"Sub-Saharan Africa's Growth Prospects,"

with the subtext being that this only really happens

with appropriate policies.

So I'll begin by first reviewing

the region's recent growth record.

I'll then discuss some key macroeconomic

and structural policies for attracting private

investments and sustaining growth.

And I'll close my remarks by commenting

on the respective responsibility of sub-Saharan

Africa's private and development partners

in supporting the recent search for durable growth.

So to start, a few words on the region's growth.

After close to two decades of robust 5% plus growth

and the associated Africa rising narrative that

we heard so much about,

performance in 2016 was alarmingly poor,

with negative per capita income growth

for the first time in 20 years.

And although improved growth, estimated for 2017,

was really barely enough to avert another year of shrinking

per capita income growth, per capita incomes.

And a further uptick in growth is projected this year

and next year, but momentum is still weak.

The commodity price shock and regional oil exporter's delay

in responding to it explain much of the poor performance.

In addition to South Africa's economic stagnation

admits its difficult politics.

But these average growth figures mask the

diversity of economic performance in the region.

A number of non-resource rich countries,

for example, Cote d'Ivoire, Senegal,

until last year, Kenya, have continued to grow robustly,

albeit with increased vulnerabilities

that I'll speak about shortly.

So that's in a nutshell what's been happening

on the growth side.

But what of the future,

and will Africa rising still be the story?

Notwithstanding, the recent weak average growth performance,

sub-Saharan Africa's long term growth prospects

continue to look good.

And that growth potential is clearly at the source of the

strong investor interest will still see,

and that gatherings like this one can promote.

I'm sure that the policy and practitioner's panels,

as well as the luncheon keynote later today,

will throw a lot more light on that potential.

But the region really must re-double its policy efforts

to realize that potential and to better exploit new

opportunities in the global economy

and to reap its much heralded demographic dividend.

It must now embark on returning to a path of durable growth

with a two pronged focus.

By continuing to implement corrective macroeconomic

policies in oil exporting countries on the one hand.

And on the other hand, by initiating fiscal consolidation

to address the worrisome vulnerability of increased

debt levels in non-resource intensive countries.

Let me now comment in more detail on three sets of policies

supportive of these two points that I've just sketched out.

The first is an emphasis on revenue mobilization.

The second is addressing debt vulnerabilities.

And the third on policies to foster improved

competitiveness and economic diversification.

Domestic resource mobilization has actually received

quite a bit of attention since the 2015 Finance

for Development Conference in Addis Ababa.

And there's been a strong consensus that it is

the most sustainable development finance.

There's indeed significant potential

for raising tax revenue,

especially in oil exporting countries.

For example, at only 6% of GDP,

Nigeria's tax ratio is the lowest in the region.

And most certainly doesn't reflect its tax potential.

The IMF estimates that the average sub-Saharan African

country could increase its tax to GDP ratio

by three to five percentage points,

with the potential in oil exporters

being the highest at 8 1/4%.

And while the region saw the largest increase worldwide

in tax revenues since 2000.

At about 18% of GDP in 2016, a medium tax ratio continues

to be relatively low.

The good progress made in increasing revenues

in sub-Saharan Africa will need to be sustained,

if in the face of limited aid, rising borrowing cost,

and debt sustainability concerns,

if the region is going to make further progress

in filling infrastructure gaps, in building human capital.

All that with a view to, of course,

attracting more private investments

and meeting other development needs.

So moving to the second set of supportive policies,

there has been, rightly, increased commentary

on sub-Saharan Africa's debt

vulnerabilities in recent months.

I think you've seen articles here and there,

including in the Economist talking about this

and, of course, institutions like the IMF speaking

about this more and more in recent months.

Debt stalks have risen rapidly throughout the region,

but especially in oil exporters.

While also inching upwards, they've increased less rapidly

in non-resource intensive countries

and in other resource intensive countries.

An increase in the debt level is in and of itself,

of course, not a bad thing.

But the pace of debt accumulation we've seen

in recent years is indeed worrisome.

The sharp rise in debt stalks in the region is largely

driven by fiscal deficits.

Debt service costs have increased,

especially for oil exporters

and other natural resource producers.

In Zambia, for example, in 2011, interest payments

on debt were about 20% of the money spent

on health and education.

But by 2017, they had risen to 50%.

Nigeria's debt service has increased from 22% of revenues

in 2016 to more than 60% in 2017.

From only seven in 2013, the number of sub-Saharan African

low income countries in debt to stress,

or at high risk of debt to stress, increased to 12 in 2016.

And several countries with sovereign

credit ratings have been downgraded.

So while there is good news for containing debt

in countries' plans for fiscal consolidation.

Implementation of such plans is often postponed.

And stronger recovery and safeguarding debt sustainability

certainly requires steadfast implementation.

Fiscal consolidation is, of course,

often easier pronounced than achieved

and can harm growth,

if it's not designed and implemented appropriately.

But there's encouraging research, again from the IMF,

that has shown that when accomplished through increased

revenues, the fiscal consolidation required

for containing debt is less damaging

to growth in the region.

But of course ladies and gentlemen,

returning the region to a path of growth

requires not only corrective macroeconomic policies.

Many of the factors that had propelled growth since the

mid-1990s have ended or are receding.

Apart from better macro-policies,

these were higher aid flows, debt relief,

record high commodity prices,

and the uptick in global liquidity

from advanced countries' unconventional monetary policies

in the aftermath of the global financial crisis.

So I'll now spend some time highlighting needed structural

policies to improve competitiveness

so that it can become a key

driver of sub-Saharan African future growth.

Competitiveness was in fact not a significant factor

underpinning the growth momentum from the mid-1990s.

Again, this is an average picture.

So of course there were some countries where improved

competitiveness was a driving factor in growth.

But overall for the region, this was not the case.

And the last 15 years actually saw a loss of competitiveness

in the region, especially in commodity exporting countries.

Improving the region's competitiveness

by further trade liberalization and by addressing needed

reforms in the financial sector

and in the business environment are critical,

so are high return infrastructure investments

to help reduce private investment costs.

We'll learn more about the business environment

from Albert Zeufack's keynote address, I believe,

in the next session.

So let me not dwell on that but instead say a bit more

about addressing the infrastructural deficit

and about trade and financial sector reforms.

And much has been written about

and said about poor infrastructure as the key constraint

to investment, to private investment

and growth in sub-Saharan Africa.

In addressing it has indeed been a key focus of African

policymakers and of their relationships

with development partners over the past decade.

I know this from my eight years, you know,

leading the Africa's, the IMF's African Department,

when financing infrastructure was really,

what dominated our policy dialogue.

And, you know, the how to do that

while maintaining debt sustainability.

I also lived that, of course,

as Liberia's Minister of Finance

in the immediate aftermath of our devastating civil war,

when infrastructure was nonexistent

after that period of war.

But here again we're likely

to hear more about infrastructure

I think from Albert's address.

So rather than repeating the facts

and enumerating the many challenges in that,

in this area, I only wanna stress the need

to insure that infrastructure is financed

in a manner protective of the domestic revenue base

and of debt sustainability while mitigating fiscal risk.

I should first note that protecting the revenue base is

essential, because domestic resources,

tax and non-tax revenues, but also domestic borrowing.

Domestic resources constitute and currently provide the

bulk of financing for infrastructure in the region.

And increasing them will remain the best

means of doing so in the future.

I want to, however, be clear that managing debt levels,

with manageable debt levels, countries can

and should borrow to expand needed infrastructure.

But doing so in a sustainable fashion requires the maximum

use of concessional financing by countries

with higher risk of debt to stress

and low institutional capacity,

as well as rigorous priority setting

and cost benefit analysis

to select the highest return investments.

And these critical elements of improved public investment

management are also necessary in countries

with lower risk of debt to stress who may consider

more non-concessional financing.

Now, after domestic resources and external borrowing,

the third source of infrastructure financing is public

private partnerships or PPPs,

which are attracting many countries in the region.

While there's clearly significant potential

for increasing the envelope

for infrastructure investments through PPPs.

But poorly designed PPPs can result in contingent

liabilities often in the form of guarantees

to private partners.

And mitigating the associated risk, it requires carefully

assessing, disclosing, and budgeting for those risks.

And significant strengthening of institutional

and legal frameworks is necessary to benefit from PPPs,

including a strong, clear role for the Ministry of Finance.

With that said on infrastructure, I'll move next

to the region's global and regional trade integration.

Sub-Saharan Africa's trade expanded rapidly.

You heard Kislaya say some things about that.

It's expanded rapidly over the past two decades of high

growth with significant increase in goods exports

between 1995 and 2013 when the export to GDP ratio rose

from 20.5% to 27.5%.

And the region's export destination also shifted

significantly from advanced countries to emerging markets,

with China becoming the single

most important trading partner.

But when seen against the rapid expansion of global trade

over the same period, sub-Saharan Africa just barely

maintained its share of world trade.

And when using the measure of centrality in global trade,

in the global trade network, with centrality measuring,

covering not only the size of exports,

but also the number of trade partners

and the relative weight of those trade

partners in global trade.

When using that measure of centrality,

sub-Saharan Africa is still the least integrated region.

By almost doubling its share over the past two decades,

developments in regional trade have been more impressive.

Although, at only 15% of total trade, intra-regional formal

trade in goods is still below other regions,

other regions estimated 17% in Central and South America,

42% in North America, 62% in the European Union,

and 64% in Asia.

More progress has been made in some regional economic

communities, such as the East African Community, the EAC

and the West African Economic

and Monetary Union or the WAMU.

And some countries are already focusing

on leveraging their comparative advantage

and integrating into global value chains

and have been successful in that regard.

Ethiopia, Kenya, the Seychelles, South Africa, Tanzania,

they're making good progress there.

In the recent signing of the Continental Free Trade Area

Agreement by 44 countries is of a

welcome development obviously.

That whole promise for greater

regional economic integration, provided, of course,

that Nigeria and South Africa, the region's two largest

economies do eventually join.

The increased interconnectedness expected

from these developments can best avert the risk of negative

cross border spillovers, if Nigeria, South Africa,

and Angola, the three largest economies accounting

for 60% of sub-Saharan Africa's economy,

if those countries pursue more

sustainable growth enhancing policies.

But not withstanding its two decade trade expansion,

the region continues to trade below its potential.

Reduce tariff and non-tariff barriers.

Improved access to credit for the private sector,

better infrastructure, better business environment,

all of those can position the region to seize opportunities

in global trade more effectively.

Ladies and gentlemen, I know that at a time of increased

protectionist pressures in this country

and in some other countries,

this is a more difficult message

to give to African policymakers.

But it is one that remains nonetheless pertinent.

Trade openness helps spur the region's past growth

and can certainly continue to do so in the future.

Let me now briefly discuss policies needed

to improve the private sector's access to credit.

I think it's especially important to highlight this issue

in the context of rising domestic public debt that has

further increased the bank's exposure to the sovereign

in some countries and reduced room for lending

to the private sector.

So this disturbing development has resulted

in declining credit growth to the private sector,

from an average of almost 19% in 2011 to 2013

to 11% in 2014 to 2016.

And there's been a contraction in real terms

between March 2006 and March 2017.

So at a time when, of course, there's a lot of talk

at the policy level about attracting more private

investment, you see a decrease in the amount of credit

that is possible for the private sector

because of what's happening with public sector debt.

There's some evidence pointing to this type of crowding out

in Angola, in the central African Economic

and Monetary Union Countries and in The Gambia.

So well orchestrated fiscal consolidation needs

to be pursued in countries with crowding out

to permit more lending to the private sector.

The removal of benefits that provide excessive incentives

to hold government securities

and implementation of macro-prudential measures

to limit the larger exposure to the sovereign may be

necessary in some countries.

And financial sector reforms such as property titling

and credit bureaus to facilitate information will

help to encourage diversification of the banks'

portfolios to more, towards more private lending.

One impressive development in the region's financial

sector in recent years has, of course,

been the rapid rise of the pan African banks,

with the scale of their operations now larger than

those of traditional European

and American banks in the region.

To reap the full potential of pan African banks

in expanding the private sector's access to credit

and to mitigate the risk of negative spillovers,

measures to strengthen cross border consolidated supervision

and to safeguard and manage risk also need

to be implemented in a timely fashion.

And as is widely known and, again, Kislaya spoke to this,

innovative financial services such as mobile banking

has expanded the access to a larger share of the population.

But small businesses and female entrepreneurs continue

to have very limited access to credit.

These inequalities can be addressed through the introduction

and strengthening of appropriate enabling environment

to further broaden financial inclusion

and by supporting more bank competition.

Given the impact they can have on private sector confidence,

it goes without saying that legal and other reforms needed

for strengthening institutions and improving governance

are also critical for attracting investments in new sectors,

as required for diversification.

Ladies and gentlemen, all these policies I've discussed

in the past 15 minutes or so are essential

to the regions objectives of attracting more private

investments, of structural transformation,

and of diversification.

As has typically been the case, when confronted

with low commodity prices,

there has been quite a lot of talk lately

about diversification since the 2014 oil price shock.

Diversification does indeed offer

the region a path to durable growth,

but only, and only, if attention to it, in fact,

outlast the shock.

Having said that, the policies I've sketched do not imply

a one size fits all recipe for sub-Saharan Africa.

Getting the policy mix right and playing

to individual country's strengths is important

for fostering diversification, and that's evident

in the different approaches pursued with some success

in Mauritius, in Burkina Faso, in Rwanda, Uganda, Botswana.

But with all of these countries adhering

to macroeconomic stability while taking different approaches

based on their own strengths.

So I've spoken at some length

about the responsibilities of sub-Saharan African

policymakers in their search

for increased levels of high quality investments.

I want to now turn to how the region's partners can help,

starting with its development partners,

be they international financial institutions,

the IMF, the World Bank, the African Development Bank,

or traditional bilateral or new bilateral partners.

The region will need continued policy advice,

as well as financial and capacity building support

from its development partners

to both deliver critical public goods that governments are

best placed to do and to facilitate

increased private investment.

But the specific need will of course differ by country.

The IFIs and traditional bilateral partners must continue

to demonstrate agility in responding

to the region's evolving needs.

I think good recent examples of such responsiveness are

revisions to the World Bank's and IMF's debt

sustainability analysis and to the IMF's debt limits policy

to, among other things, reflect the new kinds of financing

risk that countries are now facing and to facilitate more

non-concessional financing while

maintaining debt sustainability.

Another example of responsiveness, I think, is the G20's

compact with Africa, which aims to catalyze increased

foreign private investments in countries with good policies.

And as we all know, another major partner for sub-Saharan

Africa these days is China, which has certainly been agile

and is frequently praised for being responsive

to the region's needs,

especially in infrastructure in recent years.

China's One Belt, One Road Initiative can potentially

further expand infrastructure investments

with private sector financing.

Although, debt sustainability implications, again,

will need to be watched.

That said, China's voice could also be more strongly heard

in urging continued policy adjustment and reform

in sub-Saharan African oil exporters

to contain debt to manageable levels.

Debt is now unsustainable in several countries

where China is the largest creditor.

And it's full engagement with countries on these issues

will be critical in finding workable solutions.

Beyond this, the broader international community has

a important role and responsibility of advocating against

the protectionist and inward looking proclivities.

We see here, in the United States,

in order to create and safeguard a global environment

more supportive of private investment

and strong sustain sub-Saharan African growth.

So let me conclude my remarks by highlighting some of the

private investors' responsibilities in insuring growth

friendly and governance friendly investments,

a win win for sub-Saharan African

countries and investors alike.

Of course, one should avoid generalizations

about private sector behavior,

since different investors, of course,

have engaged differently with countries in the region.

That said, I think a few conclusions are still in order.

In the past, foreign investors were rightly hesitant

about making long standing, long gestating,

and costly investments amidst

political and policy uncertainties.

So enabling environments still requires significant

improvement in some countries,

but overall it has evolved in a positive direction

across the region in the past two decades.

Likewise, as pointed out earlier, the instruments

and other support being made available to investors

by MDBs or DFIs and bilateral agencies

to manage risk have increased.

I believe that investors can and should, therefore,

respond to these positive developments by contributing

to further improvements in the enabling

environment in four ways.

First, in recognition of their own survey based feedback,

that infrastructure, rather than taxes, is the most

binding constraint, investors should resist pressing

for base eroding tax exemptions.

While it is reasonable for them to request well targeted

incentives that directly reduce the cost of capital,

open ended and profit based tax holidays are less effective

and can cause longterm erosion of the tax base.

Second, investors should likewise only make

use of guarantees and other risk mitigating instruments

provided by MDBs and bilateral agencies when truly needed.

By so doing, the can help avert excessive guarantees

and moral hazard that could result from the Compact

with Africa and other blended finance initiatives.

Third, investors can best support institution building

and good governance, critical to quality investments.

By maximum transparency in their own operations

and by strictly abiding

by a country's public financial management

laws, revenue code, and regulations,

as well as the roles of key ministries,

like the Ministry of Finance,

in negotiating and monitoring their agreements,

investors can consistently demonstrate their desire

and respect for stronger institutions.

Finally, with some countries, with some reluctance

to accept the private sector's key role persisting

in some countries, investment in more outreach can increase

local communities and civil society organizations'

appreciation and be used to effectively solicit their views

and concerns about proposed or ongoing investments.

So colleagues, ladies and gentlemen,

I've covered quite a bit of ground this morning,

focusing mainly on some remaining policy challenges

for sub-Saharan African countries

and on action needed from the region's development

and private partners, you know,

with a view to ensuring that investments are indeed of the

highest quality and do indeed fuel growth.

I trust that my remarks will provide a good introduction

to some of the issues you'll be taking up

during the rest of the day.

And, I very much look forward

to your comments and questions.

Thank you very much for your attention.

(audience applauds)

(too far from mic to hear)

- Thank you very much.

That's very, very interesting.

If you can talk a little bit about what can other developed

countries, such as the United States, the European countries

do to learn from the China One Belt, One Road Initiative.

What's working there for Africa?

And what can we learn from them?

Thank you.

- Well, I'd say it's early days yet to draw lessons

from the One Belt, One Road Initiative.

It's just taking off.

It's starting to take off.

And certainly there are no concrete examples of what

has been produced from that in sub-Saharan Africa

to draw lessons from other partners.

But, there's been a call for a very long time

from policymakers for certainly more attention

to infrastructure and that has been heard

I think by many partners.

I spoke earlier about some of the adjustments that'd been

made to the debt limits policy in institutions like the IMF

to try to accommodate country's access

to more non-concessional financing

while managing debt sustainability.

But that's one responsiveness that has been there.

There are countries like this one that have invested

considerably in Power Africa in trying to respond

to a need for electricity

in sub-Saharan Africa, which is huge.

And so, I think it's too early to comment

on the One Belt, One Road.

But, it is indeed encouraging that across the board

you see quite a few initiatives on infrastructure

responding to what countries have

been saying for many years.

- [Man] I'll ask a question, and then I'll (mumbles).

So you've had the advantage of seeing this from both sides,

from the development partner side as well as

in the finance ministry, and what can you tell us

about the constraint that each side faces,

which being able to see both help you,

because I've often heard people say the World Bank,

the IMF, they don't understand the constraints we face.

And I've seen it in my country, in India.

But having seen it from both sides,

what can you tell us?

- Well, I think one thing that is not talked

about very much, in terms of the ability of both sides

to maybe adapt how they're operating

and interacting with each other, is the political economy

context or the political context

in which both sides work in.

Of course, at the level of country authorities,

the Minister of finance and other Ministers who are

struggling to push the reforms that they consider

to be the best course of trying to get to that growth

that everybody wants.

There's a lot of politics around what the Ministers

of Finance can or cannot do.

And, I think adapting an understanding to those politics

is really critical for the international institutions

and partners out there to understand a bit better than

they have in the past.

But likewise, IFIs in particular, and bilaterals as well,

do have their own politics that they have

to adjust and work within and adjust too.

And, there are times when in the IFIs, in particular,

there clearly very strong technical views of what is a

better course of action, a more adapted course of action

to a particular country, but where there are many pressures

from the board and others that have seen experiences

in other countries that want to see so called evenhandedness

sometimes applied in the policy prescriptions that those

institutions give to countries.

So, it's a matter of really understanding the

politics of institutions, understanding the

politics of individual countries

and trying to work with those in trying to get enough of a

groundswell, in terms of changing how those politics

constrain better choice of policy prescriptions.

I think that's one lesson certainly

from my sitting on both sides,

that I think a lot more work on political economy

issues is important, yeah.

- [Woman] Thank you for your presentation Dr Sayeh.

I have a question, which is just peripherally related

to what you presented, but I would love

to hear your thoughts on it.

It has to do with the social sectors in African

and particularly around education and health.

What do you see as the role of aid or investments

by private actors or government investments

in helping these two sectors advance across the continent,

given that there's so much heterogeneity across different

countries in how sophisticated these sectors are?

Thank you. - Indeed, indeed.

I can't say I have a huge amount of expertise

on the sectoral issues.

But I certainly know that the constraining factor of limited

fiscal space is an important one.

And, of course, in not just recent years, for many years,

international financial institutions have tried

to help countries work on that.

It was a whole experience of the hippic period for example,

where, you know, resources saved

from debt relief, of course, were a targeted on education

and health spending and monitored and where targets

for social sector spending continued to be monitored

in, say, IMF programs for countries.

All of that is helpful potentially,

but it's just one step of trying to make sure that more

resources are available for education and health.

But of course, the choice of what types of education

interventions is an important one in what makes

for high quality education or high quality health services.

Perhaps not enough attention, well certainly

from the World Bank a lot of work on that.

But it's not enough to focus just

on making that fiscal space.

It's really important to go beyond that

and help countries select the highest return investments

in those areas and of course make those investments

sustainable down the road.

The private sector, I think, increasingly we've seen

a lot of private funding of interventions in the social

sectors, of course, not just humanitarian,

but foundations over long period of time working

with African countries so to help them.

That is very positive, a new, relatively new developing

that I think countries like the one I worked in, Liberia,

certainly benefited quite a bit from in that immediate

post-conflict period to where there was a significant

transition to be made from resources made available

by humanitarian institutions in the war time period

to more development financing which couldn't come

and stream quickly enough, relative to the needs

because of huge arrears that Liberia had to IFIs

at the time.

And, interventions from private actors was hugely important

and very helpful in those days, yeah.

- [Man] Dr Sayeh I would like to thank you so much

for your leadership in promoting the idea of having

a sound financial policy in Africa for government

to be able to support the long term economic goals.

- Thank you.

- [Man] You did that particularly in Liberia

during a very challenging period of time.

I'm an entrepreneur for long time.

I would like to express the voice of the voiceless,

an entrepreneur in Africa in constructions and other stuff

that been developing businesses.

And I am based in the US to try to assist US companies

doing the international, especially to Africa,

a better understanding the market there

and the cultures and environment.

There's something that I didn't really quite understood

from your comments, because you keep on stressing

on that raising taxes.

The level of taxes is not enough in Africa.

If you think that Africa to reach the economic goals,

they need to attract more foreign, private investments.

How do you think that it will be really consistent in Africa

to both raise taxes

and to attract more international investment?

At a time where, as you know, all countries around the world

are trying to lower the taxes.

So don't you think that it should

be something that we should

just be, you know, very careful about promoting that,

rather than to doing harm into the main goal,

which is in fact building growth in Africa,

and not just raising taxes?

Thank you.

- No thank you for that question.

I think to answer it, it's important to clarify

that I was talking about raising more revenues,

not necessarily raising tax rates to get that revenue.

Certainly there are lots of potential for raising revenues

by simply collecting what is on the books

and what is already mandated by the revenue code.

It's not a matter of simply just jacking

up the corporate income tax rate.

It's a matter of better managing how you grant exemptions,

if you're going to grant them at all,

what types of exemptions you grant,

not open ended tax holidays that are never scaled back

and that really undermine your revenue base, for example.

It's a matter of being more systematic about the conditions

under which you give exemptions and the process

for doing so that is transparent

and that is not, you know,

one minister just passing some exemptions somewhere.

Those are the types of things I think significant potential

for revenue for really better managing tax exemptions

which are huge in sub-Saharan Africa.

And if you ask, as I was saying in my remarks,

if you ask investors in quite a bit of survey research

asking investors what really constrains their investment,

they don't say it's taxes necessarily.

They say it's an infrastructure.

How in the world are the authorities going

to build infrastructure if they don't have a tax base?

That's a problem.

They can't just borrow to finance infrastructure.

Certainly they need to combine sensible borrowing

but also with higher revenues

to be able to finance infrastructure.

So that's the balance.

No one is, you know, suggesting that countries go

after completely, you know, taxing out the private sector.

They're certainly not going to get what they intend

to, in terms of, you know, willingness to invest,

if they look so unattractive from the tax perspective.

So, point well taken, but I was not trying to suggest

that countries just jack up their taxes.

- [Man] Hi, I have two questions,

and this gentleman actually kind of touched

on one of them. - Okay.

- [Man] In terms of taxes.

I won't ask that question again,

but just as a comment.

I think if taxes are lower on corporations,

then that would create opportunities

to create job, where, at the same time,

individuals are paying taxes then that would generate

revenue for the government as well.

So, I kind of agree with him for entrepreneurs

who are outside investors from the US, for example,

or other countries coming in,

I think taxes are very important for them,

because, again, the risk is high.

Of course, they're asking for high returns,

but they also come, by coming in and investing

in African countries, they're creating jobs,

which eventually would generate high revenues.

Now, the other topic I wanted to touch on,

you mentioned mobile banking,

and I talked to a lot of people who do business

in Africa, and they said the actual growth of mobile

usage and, you know, mobile technology has helped

a lot of growth and access

to financial resources and so forth.

With cryptocurrencies that are becoming very common

in third world countries and growing countries

and so forth, growing economies, do you see that as

a risk to individual investors, to outside investors,

to private investors, and how does that come into play?

Is it going to have a positive impact on the economy

and investments or is it negative, in terms of the tax

revenues for the government again, you know,

the transactions that are happening,

regulations on cryptocurrencies?

I would think that it's gonna help a lot of people

to have access to finances again,

because it's transactions, no fee transactions

between individuals, easier access to finances,

but at the same time, it's harder to track.

So, is that additional risk for investors?

Thank you.

- Yeah, no, thanks for that question.

I can't say I know enough,

a huge amount, about cryptocurrencies

to really answer your question fully on that.

But clearly, you pointed out the risk that there would be

from that type of currency, if the regulatory capability,

the monitoring capability of countries are weak,

and they're ability to actually know what's going on

because of that type of operation is impaired.

And so, just as mobile banking, I think,

has shown that some adaptation of the regulatory framework

is necessary to maximize the contribution of mobile banking

while really containing and mitigating risk from it.

I think countries will also have to carefully look

at their own regulatory environment to see how best

to benefit from cryptocurrencies.

- [Woman] Hello, my name is Janiba Sesay,

I'm a recent graduate here at the Smith Executive MBA,

so very excited that my former

professor Krislaya invited me.

(woman questioner and lecturer laugh)

I was in banking for a long time,

but after graduation now I have my own company.

And I'm in the diaspora.

As we know lately in the African diaspora there has been

a lot of involvement, whether it is through social media

or to democraces that are emerging right now.

There has been a lot of contributing factor.

Where I'm from, the Gambia, that has been a big factor

to the most recent government there.

So my question that we have is most people in the diaspora

try to do investment into our,

you know, our native countries.

But the challenge is sometime we have is try

to work with the government.

And sometime going around the government could lead

to some private investment that are not sustainable.

Being a former Finance Minister of Liberia,

how would you advise those of us here in the diaspora

try to make those changes that would be a lasting impact?

Thank you.

- No I think you've really underscored, you know,

the huge potential there is for countries

to benefit from their diasporas,

and certainly that's the case for Liberia,

which is a very dependent on, you know,

remittances from the huge diaspora created by the war.

And there's a lot of interest currently

in a lot of looking into how to actually encourage the

diaspora to engage more,

and what sort of operations and what sort of changes are

necessary and how, you know, in certain areas

to allow them to do more.

Work in progress, you know, I think it's certainly

the diaspora people have to, I think,

link up with people who are on the ground

and who know the ins and outs of what is happening

to be able to put together a sensible, you know, proposal.

And have to keep their eyes very close to the ground

in terms of the policy and regulatory developments

what may make for profitable investment or not,

what exactly they need the authorities to change

to make their investments more productive.

And so, I think a lot of investment

in just the analytics about what is happening on the ground

is really important, to be able to have your foot

into the authorities too in terms of what

they need to do to change.

I know it's easy sometimes when one is in the diaspora

to throw darts at authorities.

Certainly that was the case when we were, you know,

trying to start in Liberia as well.

You know, everybody thought that they knew best how

to get things going.

But things can look very different when you're there

in the ground in the middle of it all.

So, I think it's really important

to have that closer link, yeah.

(too far from mic)

Oh, okay.

Thank you.

- No, no, please stay here.

(too far from mic)

So, let me formally thank you so much

for this really enlightening session.

And thank you for the discussion after that.

We have a gift and I think it'll photograph better.

- Oh boy.

(everyone laughs)

- Thank you.

- Thank you.

(audience applauds)

For more infomation >> 2018 Smith School EMF: Antoinette Monsio Sayeh - Duration: 52:48.

-------------------------------------------

2018 Smith School EMF: Investment and Business Development - Duration: 1:02:27.

- Thank you very much for this opportunity.

We have an exciting panel

with significant transactional experience

and we are going to try to cover as many issues as possible

at the granular level

and then open it up for questions

so that we can impart the various experiences on this panel.

I'd like to start with each one of you,

sort of opening statement to talk about your experiences,

focusing primarily on this concept

of mobilizing capital for Africa

and then we can go into key facets of your experiences.

I'll start with you, Uduak.

- Sure.

Good morning, or I guess we're moving into

afternoon, everyone.

My name is Uduak Essien.

I think I was introduced earlier but I am a director

at the Export-Import Bank of the U.S.

I'm a graduate of the MBA program here back in 2002,

so quite a while ago.

It was a good program back then,

I think it still is a great program so

I am very happy to be here today and share the dais

with my esteemed panelists, so thank you.

At first, I feel obliged to give you a little bit

of background about EXIM Bank and then just

perhaps a few general comments about the work

of EXIM Bank in Africa and my personal experiences as well.

The Export-Import Bank is a 100% owned government agency,

it's an independent agency of the U.S. government.

It's the official export credit agency of the U.S.

The whole idea behind export credit agencies,

whether you support the idea or not,

is to level the playing field

for exporters from respective countries.

My job at EXIM is to support U.S. exports,

U.S. exports around the, globally and also to Africa.

Take for example if you have a large infrastructure project

being developed in Nigeria,

a power project that's buying gas turbines from the U.S.,

we can finance that project

because it's purchasing the gas turbines from the U.S.

and how we calculate our financing is actually based on

what is actually bought from the U.S.

Our mission is to support U.S. jobs through exports.

That's what brings us to the table.

We don't compete with commercial banks.

The idea behind the export credit agency

is to kind of augment what they do.

There's certain markets where commercial banks

are not interested or they cannot provide

the type of financing that is needed,

whether it's tenor or they can't accept the risk,

and those are ideal places for export credit agencies

such as EXIM to step in and meet the gap,

so we're known as banks of last resort,

well EXIM is known as a bank of last resort,

that's the role that we play.

We as mandated, as part of our charter,

actually have a mandate to support transactions

in Sub-Saharan Africa

and so we have a senior level committee that is designed

to helps us reach our goals and to pursue initiatives

and we're very focused on that.

Me being in the power sector,

we're also very focused on energy projects.

We have renewables, initiatives,

so we're very interested in doing renewables, projects,

renewable energy projects on the continent as well.

Just one more quick comment

that I don't wanna fail to make is that

one of the things that, because I know we have

some developers and business owners here,

one of the things that I do want folks to take away is that

the U.S. government as a whole has a variety of programs

along the continuum of finance for different types

of businesses within the African marketplace.

We have upfront programs from like USTDA

with feasibility financing, pre-feasibility financing,

all the way to say an EXIM bank that comes in

at the very end when you're talking about

large infrastructure projects to finance those projects.

So you have Department of Commerce, you have USAID,

you have Power Africa that was also mentioned earlier

which has done a lot of work in creating the

or helping the enabling environment.

Then you have a bank like EXIM

that could come in when it comes to

the larger infrastructure projects

and help those projects go forward.

So I'll, go just-- - Great, thank you very much.

Tom, would you like to chime in on your perspective?

- Yeah, so I'm Tom Coogan from

the United States African Development Foundation.

I'm actually joined by my colleague here,

Michelle McKenzie, who also is with USADF.

USADF is an independent government agency,

in some ways similar to the EXIM Bank

where we have our own board of directors and we get our

appropriation directly from Congress.

What we do is we focus on African owned

and African managed organizations

for creating a pathway to prosperity

for those for underserved communities in Africa.

What does that mean?

We have a program in 20 countries, programs in 20 countries,

where we have a local partner and then we give seed capital,

generally grants, to organizations

in order to help them first develop capacity in some cases

and then expand for profitable expansion

so they can scale up what they're doing.

We look for the organization itself to be profitable

and then we look for the benefits to the grassroots members

or in other ways benefits to the grassroots.

We do this in three ways,

we work with agricultural cooperatives

financing in a value chain approach generally

and we have those programs in all 20 countries.

We're working with off-grid energy

as a member of Power Africa, we sit at the table

with EXIM Bank and others as one of the 12

inter-agency organizations working under Power Africa.

We're financing off-grid energy

in a major way in 10 countries in Africa

and then we're expanding that

and we're doing it in smaller ways,

but hoping to expand it to all 20 countries where we work.

Those take the form of that could be solar,

I'll get into that in a minute but that could,

about 2/3 of what fund is solar,

the other third, biogas, biomass, hydro, mini hydro, wind,

and other types of innovations, sometimes hybrids.

We also do youth entrepreneurship.

We have a nascent youth entrepreneurship program

in about two countries and in small ways we're doing that,

we're funding young African entrepreneurs to,

in most cases, to start up or to expand

the small businesses they're working with.

We began with the YALI program,

the Young African Leadership Initiative,

and then we've expanded beyond that

and we're continuing to do that.

We just concluded in Nairobi, Kenya at the end of February,

the Young African Entrepreneurship Summit, sorry, 2018,

and that was the first one that's been held

and we're gonna continue to do that on an annual basis.

We had about 55 young African entrepreneurs there.

We had about 100 participants including banks,

other finance institutions, other mentorship opportunities.

In that case, we're funded by Citibank

as well as using our own funding and

mentioned earlier, a public-private partnership.

We also work extensively

in the public-private partnership arena.

We have funding from some of our governments.

For example, the government of Uganda,

we have a $10 million, five year program

with the government of Uganda where they fund half,

we fund half of our projects,

they give us the money directly.

We work with corporations like Citibank or GE Africa.

GE Africa has funded us directly under

our off-grid energy initiative

since the very beginning for about the past four years.

We work with other types of organizations

and we're rapidly expanding these type of partnerships

and really doing outreach

for these type of partnership opportunities.

In the off-grid power sector, it was mentioned earlier,

over 600 billion Africans are currently without power,

have no direct access to power

and one anecdote that I like to tell is

the Dallas Cowboy's stadium on game day

uses more electricity than the country of Liberia.

It's hard to believe, and we're doing programs

in Liberia for example where we've,

doing small solar mini grids, 100 households in one case

and expanding that into other cases,

some solar home systems, we're expanding organizations

that are selling and implementing those.

We have the president, the first female president in Africa,

Ellen Sirleaf Johnson, come to our site and said

"Power Africa and USADF are actually doing something,"

and turned the lights on and it helped inaugurate

one of our sites in Central Liberia.

I wanted to talk about, and how we identify that,

also under power I would mention we're doing a

extensive Women in Energy program.

We started this a year and a half ago.

We're identifying women energy entrepreneurs in Africa.

We started with three countries,

we're expanding it this year,

where we give them seed capital for funding

to expand their enterprises and then help them

on a profitable growth and expansion trajectory.

We're also focusing on what we call

the power agricultural nexus, and what that means is

rural areas really is where there really is a power deficit

and in rural areas is also where

most of the agriculture takes place

so we've been working on innovations

and funding organizations that are doing things like

solar powered water pumping for irrigation,

solar powered grain milling where you can mill corn,

for example, right at the farm gate,

solar powered refrigeration for fish to preserve,

have less post-harvest losses,

or for vegetables, or in other ways.

We have programs there in Nigeria,

in Kenya, and other places.

We're also along the lines of a public-private capital

or public-private partnerships.

We're working with All-on which is an organization

that's basically Shell Oil but in Nigeria,

but they are the impact investment armor of Shell Oil

and that's on my mind because yesterday and this morning,

we've been approving and reviewing and approving

some projects that we're doing together

and what we're doing there is we're giving seed capital

to half of the funding to an organization in Nigeria

and All-on is giving a convertible loan and/or

a small piece of equity, we're doing this together.

They're gonna continue to work with the organization

over the years eventually so that they can move up

in kind of a mentorship role but also in a capital role

and this is, we signed this just last December

and we'll be funding those projects

within the next two months.

That's just a little sample of what we do

and I've got a lot more to talk about but

I'll stop there. - Sure.

Thank you very much Tom.

Brionne, would you like to chime in about the

U.S. Chamber of Commerce? - Thank you.

Good morning everyone, it's a thrill to be joined by

such esteemed panelists and an honor to be with you today.

I was asked to talk a little bit about my background

and what we do at the Chamber.

My bio has already been highlighted but what might be useful

is to talk a little bit about the way in which

I came to the work that I'm now doing at the U.S. Chamber

because it might be helpful in terms of

touching on some of the themes that came up

as part of the last presentation around

kind of aid and trade and the shift I think

that's rapidly underway in terms of the private sector

and private sector being leveraged

to really further development objectives.

I've spent the last two decades or so

working on the continent of Africa.

Did my undergrad in African studies at Georgetown and then

spent time both overseas and also in Washington

working in the development space with the organization

called the National Democratic Institute.

While living in South Africa,

I witnessed first hand some of the trends

that the prior speaker discussed in terms of

the growth of overseas or foreign direct investment

really overshadowing the overseas development assistance.

Also the youth bulge, a growing entrepreneurial

and young population across the continent.

And new business models that were being pioneered

by American companies looking to invest in the continent.

I went to graduate school then

to look at market-based approaches to development

and to understand better the ways

in which American companies could really tap into

the potential that exists on the continent.

Now at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce,

and I should mention also, in the intervening period

between graduate school and joining the Chamber,

I spent two years in the Obama administration

working on Power Africa, Trade Africa,

the Young African Leaders Initiative,

and worked closely with Tom on Power Africa,

and many other colleagues that were driving this change

that I mentioned in terms of leveraging private capital

to achieve development objectives

and worked at the intersection of legislation

and also the executive branch to explain the value

of tax payer investments in these new programs.

For the last year or so, I've been working

at the Chamber of Commerce and have been helping companies

navigate some of the regulatory and political risks

that they encounter when they enter emerging economies.

I wrote my thesis on Walmart's experience

entering South Africa and one of

the regulatory experiences that they encountered

that's pretty well documented was on competition.

Specifically, issues around labor, practices, and policies,

and so that's the kind of work

that we really do at the U.S. Chamber.

We help to support businesses in terms of identifying

some of the strategic risks that they might encounter

when they enter markets

but then also work to connect them

to the wide range of tools that exist

within federal government that's already been discussed,

some that are at the EXIM Bank,

the U.S. African Development Foundation if needed,

but also tapping into the resources

that exist within governments, African governments,

that also help to promote exports and imports and to ensure

that companies get access to the resources that they need

once they've entered those markets.

I look forward to conversations,

further dialogue about how our members which

basically represent three million companies,

we are a fully private sector,

we are a member-based organization,

we have a 300 million or so budget and around the world,

whether it's in Africa or here in the U.S.,

we help to protect the interest of business

and then we also in instances where needed,

advocate on behalf of the business sector

to promote trade and investment.

At the U.S. African Business Center,

we are the preeminent vehicle that's a private sector entity

promoting trade and investment across the continent.

Our members see enormous potential on the continent

and have a very long term and strategic approach

to how they look at the markets across the continent.

We're tracking many of the issues

that were highlighted by the last presenter

in terms of the African Continental Free Trade Agreement,

but also efforts that are underway here in the U.S.

in terms of consolidating some of the tools

that exist within government

such as through the BUILD Act which is looking at

financing and consolidating some of those tools that

currently exist in multiple agencies

and making sure that we're unlocking the financial assets

and resources that could assist private sector

and being more strategic in how they enter markets.

- Thank you, Brionne, it's quite interesting.

I've been given the challenge of being both

a moderator and also a pre-presenter,

so I'll try to do as best I can to manage those two.

From my perspective, about six years ago,

what was really exciting as an opportunity

was looking at global remittances

and trying to think about how do you connect

remittances to develop and finance,

particularly how do you connect

what people are sending home with the productive sector?

What we found was that you basically need to tranche out

those flows into two categories,

the professional diaspora and in migrant workers.

In cases where, parts of Africa where

the majority of the remittances

are coming from professional diaspora,

i.e. people who will rescind to grow, to study,

have gotten good jobs or sending money

back to their relatives for fees,

school fees, pharmaceuticals, et cetera,

and also building property,

those individuals are treated in a very special category

when it comes to regulatory context

in the country in which they live.

Migrant workers, which is much more of a

Asian, Germaine issue are treated also

in a very different way and therefore

how you treat those flows and how you connect those flows

and the channels that you use to connect those flows

to the productive sector are very, very different.

The third element that we discovered was the use

of crowdfunding or the phenomenon of crowdfunding

as a way of allowing all diasporans to participate,

whether they're professionals

or whether they're migrant workers,

whether they're retail investors unsophisticated in finance

or whether they are Wall Street traders,

and we discovered a wide array of tools

that could be used to make that connection.

I'm not gonna spend too much time on that,

but I'm happy to speak about some of the details

of what we've learned and we've learned a lot

on this subject over the past six years

and we're working with the African Development Bank,

with the Asian Development Bank, and with USAID

to share our experience in that field.

I wanna switch back to my moderator role.

What I'd like to do is instead of having sort of this

rotational thing, I'd like to open up

to a sort of a conversation on the issue

so that we get a lot more input from everybody.

There's a lot to cover, clearly.

What I'd like to do is first talk about a transaction,

a typical transaction, particularly one of your more

not necessarily the most successful one,

but one that's most typical to what your organizations offer

and walk us through where does it come from,

what does it focus on, how is it put together,

what are the challenges both here from a policy standpoint

and then there from a regulatory and reality standpoint?

I wanna start with you, Uduak.

Can you talk about export finance, a particular transaction,

choose whatever field you want, agriculture,

health care, what have you, and let's walk us through.

I'm gonna constrain you,

I'm gonna give you no more than two to three minutes.

I'd like you, the two of you,

to also chime in on some of the key aspects.

- Sure, I would love to do that.

I'll talk about power

since that's something that I focus on,

a large infrastructure project, right,

a power project say a 50 megawatt,

let's use renewable energy, so a solar farm in West Africa.

What I find with these transactions,

especially transactions that I'm seeing

coming from the continent versus other places

within the world is that you,

I get pitched a lot of deals that are much larger,

if I could say very diplomatically,

than they actually need to be.

I think working with developers

and having them understand that the lender pitch

is very different from the equity pitch, right?

Because they come to me, they say

"Oh we'll have"-- - What does that mean?

What is equity pitch and-- - Yeah, so they'll come to me

and say "The ROI on this particular investment is"--

- ROI standing for return on investment.

- Return on investment, thank you,

"For this particular investment is 15 to 22%"

or they give me all of these stats,

how much money I can make, and really as a lender,

lenders don't participate in the upside.

We just want our debt to be repaid, right?

And we just want to make sure that the project can be built,

can be implemented, it can be operated,

and that we can be repaid according to the schedule.

The challenge in working with developers and helping them

to know how to approach the lender institution,

what lenders are looking at, it's very different from what

venture capitalists or private equity

is looking at is very important.

With a lot of projects that I see

that come in from the continent,

a lot of early stage work is needed

and so I've been working within the bank

and we've been having conversations

as to how can we start to engage our transactions very early

while developers are really still putting things together?

When you talk about really large infrastructure projects,

they could be five to 10 years in the making

before they even get to me,

a project that can be financed, that's bankable.

A lot of work has gone into that.

What I've noticed on the continent

is that engagement a little bit earlier

really helps bring the project together

because a lot of times, the governments are involved

in the project because you're talking about power,

there's a dearth of power, power is very strategic,

hence the government is very focused on it.

A lot of times, the off taker or,

so if you have a generating plant

that's going to sell energy,

it's usually going to sell energy to a utility,

a utility is usually nationally owned,

so the government is sitting behind the utility.

Utility is probably operating in the red, many utilities do,

so they will require the support of the government,

so coming in as a lender and talking to

the federal government early and letting them know

what will be required in this documentation

in order to entice international lenders

to come to the table has been very key

in helping some of these projects come together,

so that's something that we've been doing.

- You're suggesting that projects can either

come from the continent or come from the U.S.

but you wanna get involved in the project preparation,

i.e. in the project structuring in of itself.

Is that because it's driven by constraints

within your organization as to how you make decisions

on funding or is that,

what's driving your need to get involved early on?

- It's really the project structure.

For the larger infrastructure projects,

they usually come in on a project finance project.

What project finance is in a very short nutshell,

in a nutshell is you're developing

a special purpose vehicle, an SPV,

to own an asset, it's a green field asset so

it doesn't exist, it doesn't currently have any cash flow,

but yet you want to borrow money from me

to build it and to operate it.

It's very different from coming in

and financing a business that has been in existence

for the last 10 years, 20 years

that has operating revenue that's profitable.

That's easy for me to underwrite,

and we underwrite those types of loans as well,

but the infrastructure projects,

they come in on a project finance basis

and so a lot is involved there and so there's a lot of,

there are a lot of agreements that need to be in place,

there are a lot of terms and conditions

that need to be factored into these agreements

to get us comfortable as international lenders,

and so when we come to the table early

before these agreements are signed,

we can ensure that this project,

once all of the facets are put together,

will be bankable, will be commercially reasonable.

- What are the key success factors of a large project

that you've taken in that you've successfully financed?

- I would say first of all, the project just,

it fits within the environment, right?

If you talk about renewable, let's use that as an example,

we like to see projects come in

that have been tendered through an official process.

- [Eric] Transparency.

- Transparency, so we do see sole source projects

where there's only one developer has been considered,

one sponsor has been considered,

they have been awarded a contract

and those projects can go through successfully.

Sometimes those projects have issues

because it was a bilateral negotiation,

you have a change of administration,

and all of a sudden the contracts are no longer valued

or don't want to be honored, so transparency is very key.

I'd like to see that the project can be built

because that's key, that's how I'm gonna get repaid,

is the project is actually built

and it's built on time and built on budget.

I need a contractor who can actually build it

who's done it in that environment,

who's done it in that environment or a similar environment,

who's used that technology, and also has the pockets

to stand behind the obligations of building it.

One of the challenges that I've seen on the continent

is that a local developer will come in

and not have the experience of implementing a project

and the first thing that I do is try and suggest

or to the extent that I can, is match make,

have you considered working with an international developer

who has this experience that can help

you implement this project?

Usually it's not very tasteful because when you JV like that

and you bring, joint venture, and you bring another party

to the table that's more experienced,

they're gonna want a cut, a large cut of the deal,

and usually the local developer doesn't wanna provide that.

- But that's a precondition to getting financed from you.

- You have to have the experience,

you have to demonstrate that you can build it

and that it will be built successfully

and that you can operate it.

- I'm assuming here that in addition to providing financing,

you do match making, and the idea is that if you find

a prospective joint venture entity

that adds to the credibility of the project

which facilitates the financing on your end.

- Yeah, I just wanna be clear.

Our official role is not to do the match making.

If we can, we try, and we make suggestions,

but that's really what brings the strength

to the transaction, is the sponsor, the development team,

what we call the EPC,

the engineering, procurement, and contracting.

Having that experience to actually build the thing,

make sure that it works so that

lenders will come to the table,

wanna finance it because they know

that they're gonna get repaid.

- Got it.

Tom, your involvement with Power Africa

and your interaction with EXIM Bank,

can you talk about that?

- We haven't worked directly with EXIM Bank but there are,

on that continuum of finance,

we're probably at the very beginning

where we provide seed capital

and EXIM Bank is at the, somewhat at the other end

where they're doing major projects.

- [Eric] What is the nature of the seed capital

that you're offering?

- I mentioned one where we do 50% grant

and 50% convertible loans, but generally we give,

we start with a grant and what we do,

I can walk through it very quickly,

like a process for the off-grid energy projects.

What we do is,

we do what we call Off-Grid Challenge,

so we advertise in a country,

we solicit for proposals and projects,

then we have a panel of outside judges

as well as people within USADF that score those,

review those, and then we do a selection

depending on how much,

what our budget is for that country,

sometimes three, sometimes five projects,

roughly at about $100,000 each.

What we do is, an example would be,

I'm thinking of a GVE in the Niger Delta in Nigeria.

Part of the key thing is identifying

these projects and these entrepreneurs.

They were this small organization that had done

a certain amount of off-grid energy work

in the solar field, but not a real lot.

We funded them to do a micro mini grid in a rural community

of about 100 households.

In effect, what they did is they became a mini utility,

but they showed and demonstrated that that model worked

and then they've actually been able

to expand significantly since then.

I think they're, at this point they have over

almost two million dollars in financing,

about 1.8 million in financing

where they've expanded in different states.

We do that identification, we have a local partner

that works with the organizations for implementation

to support them so that they are able to,

when they run into a problem

or as they go through the process, they can do that.

We look for very strong financial systems

so they're able to report well and track their own finances.

You asked about the challenges.

I think for our organization,

those challenges that we see with the organization,

first of all are the key success factors

maybe we would say is that,

the first one would be project design.

You have to have a very good project design.

If you don't have one, that can be fixed but--

- [Eric] Do you help with that?

- We do a limited amount of help with that I would say.

That would be kind of in a pre-application stage.

- [Eric] Do you point to a network of people

who can provide that kind of service?

- We often do that.

What we do find is we get, we do get

a great excess of well designed projects.

We focus on those and secondly, management.

The management of the organization to make this work,

a well designed project without good management

is not gonna work very well.

We support that in certain ways,

like we build capacity through training

and also through, especially through the financial systems.

Then I think thirdly key success factor

is that they have a vision

and a profitable plan for expansion and scalability.

Where are they going once they've done this

and how are they gonna profitably expand?

What's their vision for the next

two years, three years, five years?

I think with those what we've found is we've had

really good success with implementing

these kind of projects.

- [Eric] Great, Brionne you wanna chime in on your

experience and challenges? - Sure, let me say that the

U.S. Chamber of Commerce is not

directly involved in deal structuring,

but based on my experience in Power Africa

and also some of the well known challenges

as investors enter markets, one of the typical difficulties

that our members encounter is working with officials

that may not have familiarity

with these very complex financial transactions.

For example, with the Corbetti Power Project in Ethiopia,

a significant renewable energy project

with Power Africa's support,

it took well longer than anticipated

to work with government officials that really

many of whom don't even have their own bank account.

Some of the conversations that we're having here

in terms of how do you structure debt and equity

and how do you unlock the potential

that exists in a renewable power project,

it took a long time for government officials,

USAID that is spear heading some of that work

in Ethiopia to really walk the

government officials through that process.

Something that our members also look for

when they're considering investments,

apart from the business conducive environment

that has already been mentioned,

is also whether or not they'll be repaid.

Getting their capital out of the market

is another key criteria.

That's also an issue that I think a lot of our members

have encountered where they then seek support from

an organization like the Chamber to access the regulatory

tools and to get to the right people to get their finances

get repaid and also get issues that they might encounter

from a regulatory standpoint addressed.

- Chiming in from the diaspora angle,

what we've seen particularly in the case of off-grid,

and this is in the UK, unfortunately not in the U.S.,

we're DFID which is the equivalent

of the U.S. Agency for International Development,

has partnered with local crowdfunding platforms

like Lin-duh-han and Ethex, E-T-H-E-X,

to provide short term loans to the crowds,

i.e. retail investors including the diaspora to finance

companies that provide off-grid technologies in Africa.

They recently had a $20 million program

which involves partial guarantees of those loans

and they've been extremely successful.

Azuri Technologies, which is one of the providers,

was able to raise about 1.7 million pounds

over the space of two months

through crowdfunding technology in order to match

development capital provided by DFID.

Those are the kind of innovations that you're seeing

in terms of channeling funding from the retail,

from the diaspora that are well-structured, transparent,

or the issues that you mentioned,

something that could be quite transformative

if it's brought into the U.S., into the U.S. context.

I'd like to shift a little bit and talk about

some of the macro issues that are going on in Africa

and how you perceive that either as an opportunity,

as a threat, or else.

We're seeing what's called devolution,

i.e. where the central federal government

or the central government is pushing authority

both in terms of project selection

and in terms of financing to the municipalities.

We see it in Nigeria with Abuja,

we're seeing it in Kenya with the province of Nairobi,

and McKinsey itself, McKinsey Africa came up with a report

that suggests two things.

One, that investment opportunities are more focused

on municipalities, i.e. cities, and not necessarily states.

Then number two, that the future that we're gonna see

in Africa is the rapid growth of mega cities, that the

provinces around Nairobi, around Abuja, and in Ethiopia

area basically gonna be so big

that those are gonna be the major sources of growth.

How do you perceive that?

Where do you see potential opportunities there

and how would you structure your activities

in relation to that evolution?

Uduak, sorry.

- All right, good.

That's a very interesting trend.

There's one comment that I'd like to make

before I answer that and that is

EXIM Bank is actually, where I sit,

I focus a lot on the larger infrastructure projects.

We also have other products within the bank

that are more short term in nature.

What I do is long term, sometimes up to 18 year financing.

We do have short term projects

that are U.S. exporter facing,

so if you are a U.S. exporter

and you're exporting into the African market,

we do have financial products for you as well,

mostly in the form of working capital guarantees,

receivables insurance, so those products are available

as well as when you talk about the continuum of financing.

With regard to Eric's question about devolution

and municipalities and larger mega cities,

one of the places where I personally experience this

is actually in India.

When we first started financing

renewable energy projects in India,

it was really on the national level

in terms of the government support.

As the program continued to be, it continued to evolve,

that would spread out to the municipality level

and I can be honest with you from my personal experience,

it was a bit, the credit was a bit more

difficult to underwrite.

But they are moving forward,

that program generally has its challenges,

and I don't wanna focus on that here,

we're focused on Africa,

but it is a bit more challenging

because you don't have the sovereign,

you don't have the full faith in credit of the nation

sitting behind whatever obligations

that you are actually underwriting.

The projects that we tend to work on

when we see the large infrastructure projects,

they're usually located, and because of the nature,

right, it's very industrial,

so they're usually located in a remote area,

but they serve, they're situated to serve

obviously the major clusters of population.

That power will make it to Accra, will make it to Lagos,

will make it to Abuja, all of those major cities

but the one thing to consider there within that paradigm

is how does it make it there?

That's the grid, right?

That's one of the issues where we see is a problem

in terms of implementing these larger power projects is

it can, the grid, is the gris, is it sustainable?

Especially with renewable power

which tends to be intermittent power,

you don't get it 24 hours a day, it's not stable,

it's not slowed unless you have battery

or some other supplementary power,

and so can the grid be stable with the renewable power?

Can the grid support all of this new power

coming onto the grid and obviously transmission

and distribution is, you're talking about

very large networks here in the U.S.

If you just drive down the street

and take a look at the power lines,

that's a lot of infrastructure.

It takes a lot of time to build that stuff.

I sat on a panel once where someone talked about

the amount of money that it would take

to build out to the grid to where it needs to be

and I think it was hundreds of billions of dollars.

We can try and get the power projects built

which is challenging, but you also have to have

the supporting infrastructure to do that.

- Tom, you, I want you to chime on this question but you,

I'd like for you to also sort of

plug in the youth entrepreneurship element.

When you talk about mega cities,

you're potentially talking about youth employment challenges

and can you try to talk about what you guys are doing

in that space and what does it mean in this new environment?

- Yeah, it's a really, really good question.

I think devolution works both ways.

We've seen in Kenya that they've actually

pushed money out to the counties,

but as far as the rise of mega city goes,

that's happened and is happening.

Lagos is one of the largest cities in the world,

what I call the wonderful magnificent chaos

of a place like that.

Accra, we were just there, Michelle and I recently,

I had an experience where I arrived

at the edge of town just at dark,

thinking oh we're getting back to where we're going early,

and it took us three hours to get across town.

But that's important because you know, yes,

it's a concentration of resources,

it's a concentration of startup businesses and innovation,

and it's a concentration of,

all kinds of things are there

that you're really not gonna get in the rural areas.

What we do see then is, like with the youth entrepreneurs,

the real innovation we're finding is

generally in a place like Nairobi, in a place like Lagos.

Then they're actually taking those innovations

and applying those to rural areas

and we're seeing that with off-grid energy,

but we're seeing that with also our youth entrepreneurs.

One example, Brenda Katsewigye who is in Kampala,

we had funded her, she was doing a small,

what do they call, recycling, plastic recycling.

She actually then identified that,

she found that she was able to actually make eye glasses

from the plastic that she'd recycled and saw this need

and then actually has been producing those

and selling those through school.

She actually took one innovation

and then moved it into another area,

and so that includes rural areas where

sometimes they'll do testing in a school and find that

the parents never knew that the children

actually needed eye glasses and it can really change things,

and these are very low cost.

She's made a very successful business out of that.

That would be one example.

It is true that mega cities and the concentration,

and that's where you're gonna find the innovation

and that's where you're gonna find kind of the excitement

and what's going on, and that's where the,

I'm not saying that's where the youth wanna be,

but that's where we often identify

these young entrepreneurs,

but they're also moving those innovations

to the rural areas.

- [Eric] Brionne, wanna chime in?

- Sure, so I would just say that in terms of

the rapid moves that we're seeing towards devolution that

governments are also looking at their development

trajectories through the lens of job creation.

They're viewing the private sector

as a partner in creating jobs.

As a result, the opportunities

that are offered through devolution

also create new opportunities that previously hadn't emerged

in terms of reaching rural or remote populations.

I think businesses are coming up with creative models

to reach some of those rural populations and so

there are also I think some

complex regulatory challenges that also emerge,

if now you're no longer negotiating

just with federal government,

but you're negotiating with municipal government

and you have to now pay taxes at multiple levels.

That dynamic is also creating new regulatory challenges

I think for businesses that are seeking

to navigate these contexts.

There are actually, I think that presents

a really great business opportunity.

New organizations have been created

to help companies also figure out

how to be strategic as they enter.

One that comes to mind is an organization

called Fraym, F-R-A-Y-M,

which has actually pulled together

this great database of data that had in the past

been used primarily for health and educational purposes,

but use that data to actually identify where are

the highest potential for say a product that might be

a product that Proctor & Gamble might be producing,

a detergent or something,

they may look at where is the most likely demographic

of individuals located from a

kilometer to kilometer square area

to target the delivery of a product

in an area where it's most likely to be profitable.

You're seeing also I think

from the standpoint of innovation,

new sources of data being tapped to kind of create

and sort of surface these new business opportunities

that help businesses look through the lens of these markets

that are more challenging to navigate

or where you don't have as much data

that's readily accessible

a little bit more accessible and available.

I think that that's a trend that we're gonna continue to see

and then the other thing that I will just mention

in terms of innovation and jobs creation

is that you're also seeing companies

pioneering new approaches to looking at how,

for example, assist rural companies get access

to the internet, for example,

through the creation of Zoom, you know,

something that's like suspended in the air

that actually helps remote populations

get access to internet, and that also unlocks

a whole new potential that's created by the digital economy

that Microsoft, Facebook, and a number of other groups

are pioneering, or companies are pioneering.

I think that's also an opportunity

and then a third trend I would elaborate on

is just the public-private partnerships potential there.

UPS for example, in terms of delivery

of humanitarian assistance has partnered with companies

to use drones to actually deliver

health goods to remote communities.

I think that these, the devolution and what you're seeing

in terms of reaching more remote populations

is also creating and exposing new business opportunities

and forcing the development of new business models.

- Great.

I wanna end with one question before we go to lunch

which I see very hungry eyes there.

China, China clearly has made inroads into Africa

both at the national level and now at the municipal level

and even at the private sector level

where they're providing a whole range of services

and sources of finance, so retail finance,

municipal finance, as well as national finance.

Even Power Africa, when you look at the actual numbers

in the context of China's contributions, it's challenging.

Can you speak to China, its role, how are you perceiving it,

and how are you addressing it from your perspective?

- Well yeah, China's always the one topic that comes up

when you talk about working in Africa,

especially these bigger infrastructure projects.

I can only speak anecdotally from what I've seen,

what I've seen on my personal travels

and what I've seen in meetings

talking with developers, government officials.

I'm sure many of the projects are built well

and are delivering the capacity, the energy,

or whatever it is they're supposed to deliver,

but there are a number of projects that don't.

Recently I was in Nigeria and if you fly into

the International Murtala Muhammed Airport,

there's a large building standing right there

and it's been there for a year and it has not opened yet.

There are lots of issues that,

in working with Chinese contractors

but I think you need to do your due diligence

because a lot of projects are going forward,

a lot of projects are working,

but you can't be attracted by a low,

just strictly a low price.

We have to make sure that the project can be implemented

because at the end of the day, you're gonna waste more money

chasing Chinese money if you're not bringing

the right parties to the table.

- Okay, Tom?

- I think I'd make a couple comments there.

One, clearly we need to be aware that China

is being very strategic in their investments

and what they're doing and I think it's a challenge to us,

the U.S. and others, to be strategic as well

and to be able to do that in the right way.

In the off-grid energy field, we actually have,

there's American companies that compete

and that have better quality and compete on price

in things like batteries, connectors, inverters,

and things like that, on commodities not so much.

One of the things that we've been battling actually

in off-grid energy is the awareness of solar

has a very negative perception

in a lot of rural places in Africa because

the products that have come from China are very low quality,

very cheap, they've got them out there,

and then they just tend to not work and

actually they've created a very bad impression on solar,

so we've had to overcome that in a lot of ways

with higher quality products and actually things that work

and we've found with some of our projects,

we have a 99.9% uptime, you know,

a solar mini grid with proper batteries

which is better than the national grid

by a factor of two or three.

I guess those are the two things I can point out.

- [Eric] Brionne.

- Sure, so many of our members are facing

an enormous degree of competition from Chinese companies,

there's no question that American companies

have been well behind the clip that we've seen

in terms of the pace of Chinese investment.

I think a lot of that is helped by state sponsored support,

particularly in the infrastructure space if you look at

China's investments, $50 billion I think in 2014

through state sponsored financing vehicles that

really enable Chinese companies to compete for deals that

are government procurements that American investors,

for a variety of reasons, are unable to compete with,

just on the financing alone.

Then when you compound that with the fact

that the Chinese government also sees Africa

through the lens of this strategic

longterm engagement and mineral extraction

and the fact that I think for a long time,

American investors have been more risk adverse,

they also face stricter compliance

around Foreign Corrupt Practices Act

and then add to that also the fact that on cost,

American companies are also not quite as competitive.

I think that this is also why

the Chamber supports initiatives

like the global procurement initiative

which encourages countries and governments

to look at best value as opposed to best price.

Those kinds of initiatives really

I think will change the trajectory

along with some of the other reforms

that are being currently considered

through legislative proposals around financing,

the ease of accessing the tools available

through EXIM, OPEC, and other agencies.

Then also I think that we really do have an important hurdle

in terms of helping to support American companies

to understand the longterm value

and the benefits and the return on equity and investment

that exist in Africa's growth markets.

We've put forward a set of recommendations at the Chamber

to the Trump administration looking at

a wide range of different types of policy interventions

that could be helpful and supportive

in terms of growing American companies' presence

on the continent, but also we're seeing

that through direct experience,

that governments have had working with Chinese companies,

that there's also a preference

to work with American companies

and we're tapping into that as well.

- Just to add on to that,

I think that definitely does exist,

that I do see a preference to work with American companies,

I do see that in many different sectors,

but I think the lure of the low price is the issue.

One of the things that was mentioned earlier,

and one of the things that we're facing

that we don't have an answer to is

the way we operate as an export credit agency,

we've signed an agreement called the OECD arrangement,

and what it does in many other developed country,

export credit agencies have signed that agreement,

and under that agreement it provides for terms

and conditions for which you can offer your financing.

It also provides for minimum pricing so that

exports are competing in terms of price and quality

and not necessarily money being thrown at the project

or at the exports from the state sponsored entity.

So we've signed it,

and many in the European Union have signed it,

obviously China has not signed it,

and that's something, Russians have not signed it,

and that's something that we deal with every day.

They're able to do things and offer pricing that

we cannot offer because we have signed onto this agreement.

- Great, on that note what I'd like to do

in the interest of time is sort of open it up for

how many questions ...

- [Man] Couple of questions.

- Couple of questions and then we can wrap up before lunch.

Could you please identify yourself

and your organization before you ask the question?

Then if anybody on the panel

that you're directing your question to.

Thank you.

- [Joshua] Joshua Abraham with the Smith School.

The question is to the whole panel.

How do you see the Trump administration

and comments on Twitter that he makes about Africa

may affect decisions of these countries making business,

doing business with the U.S. compared to China

who will probably will treat them as equals?

Thank you.

- We'll take a couple and we'll, gonna ...

Go ahead.

- Oh, sure.

Good morning, Andrew Sanchez,

I'm from George Mason University.

The question I do have, a lot of the speakers before

talked a lot about revenue and debt.

Specifically for you, Ms. Essien,

I'm sorry if I got the name wrong,

but as a lender you talk about

getting your money back obviously,

have you seen any of the issues

that like the World Bank mentioned about debt with,

the whole issue with debt in Africa specifically?

- Okay we'll take those two questions.

Wanna start with the second one first or?

- Oh sure, I'd be happy to.

I'm glad that you did ask that question,

thank you for that question because

actually there were a lot of interesting things

in that presentation and one of them was

sustainable debt and as I laid out before,

especially when you're talking about energy projects,

energy drives the economy.

Businesses need cheap, reliable energy

in order to manufacture you've gotta run that engine,

so you really need that power and usually power

that comes from the grid versus diesel power,

but one of the things that we're seeing is a lot of times

one of the stakeholders in the structure

of the transaction is the utility,

the utility is not credit worthy.

So you look for state support.

One of the challenges that we're seeing these days is that

federal governments, governments are unable because

they may have signed on to some world bank program,

they're unable to stand behind the obligations

of the utility because that is contingent debt

that you have to disclose on your balance sheet

and you get a hit for that.

That is a challenge that we're seeing nowadays and

we have to be more innovative to come up with a structure

to ensure repayment.

One thing that I didn't talk about earlier is that

as an ECA, we're not grant making,

we're not development finance institutions,

there are a lot of different types of institutions

that sit along the continuum of finance.

We have a mandate for a reasonable assurance of repayment

so we are looking at credit worthy transactions,

we do want to get paid, we are guardians

of U.S. taxpayer dollars because

that's where we're dispersing from.

We have to come up with these structures

to make these deals credit worthy without,

in some cases, having the obligations,

the sovereign standing behind the obligations of the project

or just generally speaking.

One of the things that we've done is just kind of

limit those obligations to certain events

and sometimes that is more feasible,

that's more palatable, that can be accepted

and so that's one of the things that we've done,

but it has been very challenging

when you're talking about debt levels.

I think what was reported earlier, 70% debt levels

and lots of floats on the Eurobond market and

current payments that are coming due

and how will those payments being made,

so those are real issues.

- Any other comments on that from the rest,

from the other panelists? - Not on that.

- Not on that. - I can speak

to the first questions.

- Yeah so the second question was about the Trump effect.

Wanna focus on that?

- Everyone's looking to me.

(laughing)

I think I mentioned Trump first, so I'm happy to.

There's no question that many of the negative comments

that had been made as well as the signals

that have been said have not been helpful.

Now I do think that it's important though to look at,

I think it's still early days in some respects because

if you look historically at the ways in which

presidents have engaged the continent,

it's often in the second administration, a second term.

In some ways there's still a lot on the table,

so Secretary Ross, the head of the commerce department

will be headed to Africa at the end of June, early July,

and will be visiting Kenya, Cote d'Ivoire, Ethiopia,

and I'm missing a country. - Ghana.

- Ghana, thank you.

There will be I think quite a bit

in terms of commercial engagement.

I think it's also important to recognize

in even the commercial space,

some of the architecture of President Obama's

past initiatives have still remained in place.

Power Africa is one of them.

But then also the president's advisory council

on doing business in Africa

which is the council under which Secretary Ross

will be taking his upcoming fact finding trip.

I think also he has continued to keep a clip in terms of

assessing what are the major barriers in terms of,

and for all of you who are in the audience,

I encourage you to take a look at the report

which came out late last year.

It has nine different dimensions that were,

the council's recommendation,

or the councils actually identified obstacles to working

in Africa and now a set of recommendations is emerging.

I think we still have to see what the impact might be.

Obviously from a diplomatic standpoint,

it hasn't been helpful in terms of the overall strategy

and just the appreciation of the continent as a partner.

But I think there's also something

that is somewhat palatable in the Trump messaging

around getting the best deal.

Oddly in my anecdotal conversations

with Africans that I speak with,

there's something around kind of this notion

about whether or not there can be negotiations

under which Africa stands to get a better deal.

The concept of America first is certainly not new.

China has been looking at its approach with Africa

as China first and it's time I think

that Africans also look at their countries as Africa first.

There will be I think still discussions under way

and we're closely tracking that

and still look to what might emerge from the upcoming trip

and our members are quite active and engaging

and trying to figure out where there are opportunities.

- Thank you.

From the diaspora standpoint, on a lighter note,

I think the response is fairly evident

in the Black Panther movie gross box office numbers.

On that note, I wanna thank the panelists.

I think this has been an incredible contribution discussion

and also the Smith School, thank you.

(audience applauds)

For more infomation >> 2018 Smith School EMF: Investment and Business Development - Duration: 1:02:27.

-------------------------------------------

Un tempo per tornare: Chris incontra Scott - Duration: 3:41.

For more infomation >> Un tempo per tornare: Chris incontra Scott - Duration: 3:41.

-------------------------------------------

SỐ CHUẨN 24H - soi cầu chốt số 8/6 | ĂN RỰC RỠ 4 NHÁY LÔ | TIẾP TỤC SIÊU DỰ ĐOÁN - Duration: 12:47.

For more infomation >> SỐ CHUẨN 24H - soi cầu chốt số 8/6 | ĂN RỰC RỠ 4 NHÁY LÔ | TIẾP TỤC SIÊU DỰ ĐOÁN - Duration: 12:47.

-------------------------------------------

이스라엘은 어떻게 '언터처블'이 됐나? / korean army 24h - Duration: 14:12.

For more infomation >> 이스라엘은 어떻게 '언터처블'이 됐나? / korean army 24h - Duration: 14:12.

-------------------------------------------

チキンラーメン・ひよこちゃん 宣伝活動に疲れて溶ける(J-CASTニュース) - Duration: 3:23.

For more infomation >> チキンラーメン・ひよこちゃん 宣伝活動に疲れて溶ける(J-CASTニュース) - Duration: 3:23.

-------------------------------------------

「Nightcore」→ Thriller ✗ Billie Jean ✗ Beat it ✗ Bad and MORE (Switching Vocals / Jared Halley Cover) - Duration: 5:28.

Nightcore - Michael Jackson Mashup (subtitles in video)

For more infomation >> 「Nightcore」→ Thriller ✗ Billie Jean ✗ Beat it ✗ Bad and MORE (Switching Vocals / Jared Halley Cover) - Duration: 5:28.

-------------------------------------------

House Bill 1184 - GEC or Associate Degree Pathways - Wytheville CC Dual Enrollment - Duration: 5:05.

Okay. The next question is that how can

dual enrollment students not only receive

dual enrollment credit, but what can they

do towards earning a possible general

education certificate or even an

associate's degree concurrent with high

school work? And in Virginia, House Bill

1184 was established most recently --

roughly about five or six years ago

which gives the students --

the dual enrollment students -- the option of earning

one or both components as part of their

dual enrollment experience. Of course,

the first would be the general education

certificate, which has 33 credits in the

Virginia Community College System and the

associate's degree -- and students have the

option of either taking the general

studies pathway or the science pathway

which will be 61 credits. The class

coverage on what is covered by the

school system and what is not really

largely depends and varies from school

system to school system. Most do require

financial responsibility for any

coursework taken at WCC not needed for

their respective high school diploma and

we've established pathways to help

navigate that process. The first thing

that students will need to do is they

will need to formerly complete a

declaration of intent form. This can be

done either with myself or with their

guidance counselor indicating the

program of interest.

The associate's degree goes over

the individual classes needed. There's

the College Success Skills, the English

111 and 112, the composition classes, as

well as the literatures. Two college-level

math classes. Two biology or two chemistry

classes or anatomy that can also count

as well. Two history classes, they must be

Western Civilization or U.S. History. Four

social science classes and I've given

examples there either in economics,

geography, history, psychology or

sociology. One humanities elective, and I've

also given those prefixes as well. Art,

Film Appreciation, another Literature, a

Humanities, Philosophy or Religion class.

Two transfer electives which can be any

of the courses listed above. The

communications class. The ITE 115 class,

as well as a one credit health or physical

education. Credit by experience is

available for the bottom two classes if

students possess or earn Microsoft

Office Specialist certification and/or

CPR certification. Keep in mind that

these classes will not transfer on to a

four-year school if this choice is made.

For the associate's of Science, a lot of

the classes are the same with several

changes. There is one Literature

requirement, as opposed to two.

Specifically, there are math classes and

specifically, we look for more calculus

and more higher level math classes. Four

lab sciences. Only one history

requirement. Only two social science

requirements. Two STEM electives which can

consist of higher level math. It could be

engineering. It could be computer

programming or higher level biology

classes. One science without lab, which

can be a Biology 285 or a Natural

Science 150, Again, the communications

elective. The ITE 115. The humanities

elective as well as the health and

physical education which the difference

here is that the science degree requires

two credits.

And finally, the general education certificate,

which carries 33 credits, still carries

the College Success Skills. One English

Composition. One college level math. Two

lab sciences. Three social sciences and

two humanities, as well as the

communications elective which can be

used either as Dual Enrollment English

112 or communications. Students who do

receive one of the associate's degrees

automatically receive the GEC.

Now again, we strongly recommend taking

courses, especially the ones that are

through WCC, during the summer months to

balance out the main semester coursework.

Of course, it would be the College Success Skills,

the communications course, the health and

physical education, whether it's the one

or two credit option, the ITE 115 and

the humanities elective. Again, credit by

experience would be available for the

ITE as well as the health and

physical education credits.

For more infomation >> House Bill 1184 - GEC or Associate Degree Pathways - Wytheville CC Dual Enrollment - Duration: 5:05.

-------------------------------------------

「Nightcore」→Pushed Down (Lyrics) - Duration: 3:08.

「Nightcore」→Pushed Down (Lyrics)

For more infomation >> 「Nightcore」→Pushed Down (Lyrics) - Duration: 3:08.

-------------------------------------------

Getting an $8k per Month Client For Your Digital Agency - Duration: 4:09.

hello all. Nick Calabro here with Calaboration and I want to just quickly

talk about a new client that we picked up at collaboration one of the largest I

mean well definitely the largest client that we have right now that we've just

landed paying approximately 8,000 dollars a month on retainer now I want

to talk about this right because first of all I want to let you know how you

can land clients like this right eight thousand dollars a month for one single

client is like more than people make in their lifetime in their entire full-time

jobs right so it sounds a lot better than it is obviously things are always

it going to be inflated and you know optically enhanced and whatnot but

essentially the big picture here is that this client their mortgage lender big

big mortgage company and the big thing is that they're doing a lot Ilan's a lot

of print media so what do I mean by that they're doing lawn signs they're doing

mailers they're doing you know Flyers brochures stuff like that so these

things collaborations handling them right collaborations doing the printing

collaborations doing the design work even the distributing and whatnot that

stuff and we've talked about this in previous videos takes up so much of your

budget okay if you're doing lawn signs right we do this with photo go campaigns

as well we do like the lawn signs and you know get-out-the-vote stuff those

things you'll go broke just sending out flyers and doing lawn signs that stuff

like that so that $8,000 honestly not so much half a company like at least a

quarter of that money is being spent directly on just our overhead like that

is being spent to the printers that is being sent to you know the post office

sending the stuff out distributing and whatnot and so that's like okay so

technically if we call all that stuff out what is collaboration actually

making all that what am I making off that as CEO of collaboration well

collaborations making maybe you know five six thousand dollars maybe about

fifty five hundred yeah fifty five hundred dollars a month on this client

because of all the printing that we're doing so are they still in $8,000 a

month client at that point well yes they are right because that money is going

through your company right so here's the really big thing to keep in mind when it

comes to a lot of these different services industries you want your ad

spend you want your all your overhead cost and everything you want that to be

going through the company don't say hey you guys put the bill for the ad spend

you guys take care of the distribution and whatnot and we'll just take care of

the design right because you want that money to go through your channel right

because that is still revenue for you even if it's not profit okay you still

want that money to go through your system right because now that turns from

a $5,000 a month client to an $8,000 a month client one of them sounds a lot

better one of them is much better for your business even though they're

technically the same right because the amount of money that you're actually

making off that client is about the same okay so bottom line here is just always

try to eat as much money as you can out of your potential clients because it's

better off in your hands and you can actually even charge more by managing it

right so like if you're brokering the distribution of these flyers and

brochures and signs and whatnot you can charge for that too okay like you can

charge for yeah we got it printed so here's like the at cost printing but

then here's the us going to the printers right like that is a cost that they will

pay for happily because I don't want to deal with it any of that stuff okay so

again the money's better off in your pocket

the money's better off going through your channels that way you can write it

off that way you can actually have the revenue present even if you are paying a

lot of overhead and essentially yeah just make more

money sounds easy right go do it I'm Nichola bro get to work

For more infomation >> Getting an $8k per Month Client For Your Digital Agency - Duration: 4:09.

-------------------------------------------

'미운우리새끼' 태진아 우유콜라 라면 레시피 집 공개 "진아기획 소속연예인 태진아 노래모음 28곡"|K-News - Duration: 6:47.

For more infomation >> '미운우리새끼' 태진아 우유콜라 라면 레시피 집 공개 "진아기획 소속연예인 태진아 노래모음 28곡"|K-News - Duration: 6:47.

-------------------------------------------

'슈가맨2' 콜라 박준희 김영완 김송 근황 공개 "결혼 남편 강원래 아들 강선"|K-News - Duration: 6:21.

For more infomation >> '슈가맨2' 콜라 박준희 김영완 김송 근황 공개 "결혼 남편 강원래 아들 강선"|K-News - Duration: 6:21.

-------------------------------------------

This 30' House from Tiny Diamond Homes Is a "Brilliant" Gem - Duration: 2:53.

For more infomation >> This 30' House from Tiny Diamond Homes Is a "Brilliant" Gem - Duration: 2:53.

-------------------------------------------

The Amazing World of Gumball - Lunch Song (CZ) - Duration: 0:17.

♪ Uh, Dad is babysit us, ♪

♪ I can eat what I like. ♪

♪ Today I will choose myself, ♪

♪ how I avoid hungry. ♪

♪ I'm going to put chocolate to the bread and the piece of ham, huh

♪ ketchup with a syrup to add a taste. ♪

For more infomation >> The Amazing World of Gumball - Lunch Song (CZ) - Duration: 0:17.

-------------------------------------------

Smart Forfour 52 KW business solution - Duration: 0:54.

For more infomation >> Smart Forfour 52 KW business solution - Duration: 0:54.

-------------------------------------------

《金家好媳婦》EP109 盧彥澤得知老婆黑歷史臉色大變 - Duration: 3:23.

For more infomation >> 《金家好媳婦》EP109 盧彥澤得知老婆黑歷史臉色大變 - Duration: 3:23.

-------------------------------------------

敦馬宣布一視同仁給反對黨選區撥款,他竟還嫌三嫌四,給臉不要臉一開口又被網民屌到漏油活該 - Duration: 8:27.

For more infomation >> 敦馬宣布一視同仁給反對黨選區撥款,他竟還嫌三嫌四,給臉不要臉一開口又被網民屌到漏油活該 - Duration: 8:27.

-------------------------------------------

Dr. Virginia Apgar: Google Celebrates The Anaesthesiologist's 109th Birthday With Doodle - Duration: 2:57.

Google Doodle honors Dr. Virginia Apgar, savior of endless infants.

Her test enables pick out newborns who can be having health problems.

At some point of the Nineteen Thirties and '40s, Dr. Virginia Apgar noticed a troubling

trend regarding newborns.

Even as the infant mortality charge within the US had declined, the charge of little

one deaths inside the first 24 hours after birth remained constant.

As an obstetric anesthesiologist, Apgar became capable of perceive physical characteristics

that might distinguish healthy newborns from those in problem.

Apgar's observations led to the development in 1952 of the Apgar score, a brief and handy

technique for at once comparing how nicely the new child weathered the birthing method,

in particular the consequences of obstetric anesthesia.

To honor Apgar's contribution to neonatology -- the medical care of new child infants -- Google

dedicated its Doodle Thursday to the physician on her 109th birthday.

Generally carried out one and five mins after delivery, the check assigns a score of zero

to 2 for each of five standards: look, pulse, grimace, activity and breathing (APGAR).

Ratings of 7 and higher are normally everyday, 4 to six fairly low, and 3 and lower are usually

regarded as severely low.

The test allows clinical employees decide whether a newborn wishes instant hospital

treatment.

The check unfold via US hospitals in the Nineteen Sixties, proving a useful dimension for quick

assessing a newborn's physical circumstance.

The approach is still used in hospitals all through the us.

Apgar graduated fourth in magnificence at Columbia college university of Physicians

and Surgeons in 1933, and in 1949 became the primary female named a complete professor

at the faculty.

In 1959, she embarked on a 2nd career, earning a master's diploma in Public fitness from

Johns Hopkins faculty of Hygiene and Public health.

Armed together with her new diploma, she went to work at the March of Dimes foundation,

directing research to save you and deal with birth defects.

She additionally posted greater than 60 scientific articles and numerous essays for newspapers

and magazines in the course of her profession.

Her 1972 book Is My Baby All Right?

Explains the causes and treatment of not unusual beginning defects and proposes precautions

to assist enhance the chances of getting a wholesome child.

Apgar died on the age of sixty five in 1974.

No comments:

Post a Comment