Tuesday, March 21, 2017

Youtube daily report Mar 22 2017

G WHAT

THEY ARE CALLING A CRIME SCENE

HALF AN HOUR AGO.

IN THIS UPSCALE HANOVER

NEIGHBORHOOD, POLICE WERE CALLED

TO THE HOME ON BATES WAY AT 4

-- 4:00 P.M. THIS AFTERNOON.

>> THE HOMEOWNER ARRIVED TO FIND

SOMEONE IN THE HOUSE WHO WAS NOT

AUTHORIZED.

JORGE: CHIEF SWEENEY NOT

CONFIRMING THE RELATIONSHIP, BUT

SEVERAL NEIFGHBORS REPORTING THE

-- NEIGHBORS REPORTING THE MALE

SUSPECT HAD LIVED IN THE HOME

FOR SOME TIME.

A BUCKET WITH HAZARDOUS LIQUID

WAS FOUND IN THE KITCHEN.

>> THERE WAS A VAPOR EMITTING

FROM A BUCKET INSIDE THE KITCHEN

AREA OF THE HOME.

JORGE: A 300 FOOT PERIMETER WAS

QUICKLY SET UP AROUND THE HOUSE,

WITH THE IMMEDIATE NEIGHBOR

EVACUATED.

THE STATE HAZMAT TEAM WAS CALLED

IN.

THE SUSPECT WHO APPARENTLY HAD

ALSO DOUSED HIMSELF HAD TO BE

WASHED DOWN.

>> WITH WATER BEFORE WE

TRANSLATED -- TRANSPORTED HIM.

JORGE: IT TOOK THREE HOURS TO

CLEAN AND MAKE THE HOUSE SAFE TO

ENTER AGAIN.

LATE TONIGHT THE SUSPECTS CAR

WAS TOWED AWAY.

POLICE SAY HE APPEARED

INCAPACITATED.

>> HE WAS TRANSPORTED TO A LOCAL

HOSPITAL FOR EVALUATION.

JORGE: WE WERE TOLD EVERYONE IS

FINE, POLICE ARE NOT SAYING WITH

THE LIQUID WAS.

THEY ARE NOT RELEASING THE

SUSPECT'S NAME.

HE HAS BEEN CHARGED WITH

ENTERING AND BREAKING IN TO A

HOME TO COMMIT A FELONY.

For more infomation >> Man charged in Hanover hazmat scare - Duration: 1:33.

-------------------------------------------

The School of Life | La nuez defectuosa - Duration: 7:36.

Our brains are brilliant instruments,

able to reason, synthesise, remember and imagine at an extraordinary pitch and rate.

We trust them immediately and innately – and have reasons to be deeply proud of them too.

However, these brains – let's call them walnuts in honour of their appearance – are also very subtly and dangerously flawed machines.

Flawed in ways that typically don't announce themselves to us

and therefore give us few clues as to how on guard we should be about our mental processes.

Most of the walnut's flaws can be attributed to the way the instrument evolved over millions of years.

It emerged to deal with threats; some of which are no longer with us,

and at the same time, it had no chance to develop adequate responses to a myriad of challenges generated by our own complex societies.

We should feel pity for its situation

and compassion for ourselves.

Attempting to live requires us to adopt a focused and ongoing scepticism

towards a great many of the ideas, schemes and feelings generated by the faulty walnut

that stands at the top of our spinal column.

Here are just some of the many things we need to watch out for:

> The walnut is influenced by the body to an extent it doesn't recognise:

The walnut is extremely bad at understanding why it is having certain thoughts and ideas.

It tends always to attribute them to rational, objective conditions out in the world,

rather than seeing that they might be stemming from the impact of the body upon its thought processes.

The walnut doesn't typically notice the role that levels of sleep, sugar, hormones and other physiological factors play upon the formation of ideas.

The walnut adheres to a psychological intepretation of plans and positions that are, at heart, frequently merely bodily.

Therefore, the walnut can feel certain that the right answer is to divorce or leave the job right now

rather than go back to bed or eat something to raise blood sugar levels.

> The Walnut is influenced by its past, but can't see its own projections:

The walnut believes it is judging each new situation on its own merits,

but it is inevitably drawing upon patterns of action and feeling shaped in previous years.

This saves time, and has real evolutionary advantages,

except that many situations in the present are in fact deceptive,

resembling the past only sufficiently to trigger a familiar response,

while in fact having many unique characteristics that get overlooked.

At moments of ambiguity, the walnut can jump to some catastrophic conclusions.

> The Walnut doesn't like to stop and think:

The walnut evolved for rapid, instinctive decision-making --

and has a grievously hard time stepping back to address what we might term the big first order questions.

So bad is the walnut at thinking, it often needs another walnut nearby to help it along its way.

Thinking generates anxiety and a desire to run fast in the opposite direction

because of the difficult truths the walnut might unearth.

But in the presence of another walnut, we can't so easily bolt and turn back to the web.

That's why philosophy started as a conversation

and psychoanalysis depends on two people unpacking one person's thoughts and associations.

Sadly, we rarely call on other walnuts to help us to think

and usually pass the time with walnuts chatting idly about sport or the latest celebrity scandal.

> The walnut is bad at self-control and gets passionate about, and scared of the wrong things:

The walnut constantly gets excited about things which aren't good for it:

sugar, salt, and sex with strangers for a start the list.

Advertising knows how to exploit this cognitive frailty to perfection.

Our confusions can generally be traced back to targets that would once have been crucial and fitting for us to focus on.

Our desires used to be reliable in simpler environments,

but in the complicated conditions of modernity, they cause chaos.

The same holds true for our fears:

in the past, fears were simply bound to things that could kill us.

Fears were a good idea to get us out of genuine dangers.

But nowadays, many things excite our fear systems without there being any real threat.

We have panic attacks before speaking in public for no good reason

while at the same time, the real, more subtle threats of modern life (global warming or another subprime mortgage financial crisis)

evade our detection radars entirely.

> The walnut is egocentric, not polycentric:

The walnut is primed to look at things from its own point of view.

It often simply can't believe that there are other ways of considering an issue.

Other people can therefore seem perverse, or horrible to it – sparking outrage or self-pity.

It's only in the last second, from an evolutionary point of view,

that the walnut has started to try to imagine what it might be like to be someone else

(a symptom of this is that it's learnt to take pleasure in novels).

But this is still a fragile empathetic capacity, which tends to collapse,

especially when the walnut is tired, and someone is trying to persuade it of a strange-sounding idea.

> The walnut isn't an independent thinker:

The walnut grew up dependent for its survival on the mood of the group or clan.

It's therefore highly primed to fit in with common sense and prevailing opinion.

It doesn't generally like to use itself as a source of original data or insight.

Other people's opinions matter hugely irrespective of how foolish they might be – or indeed widespread.

Because we came from small groups, one or two compliments can delight us; one criticism can sow panic.

This is tricky in the age of Twitter.

> The walnut misunderstands causality:

The walnut used to think it might have been responsible for the lightning in the sky

and that earthquakes were a result of its own bad thoughts and deeds.

It took a while for that skewed perspective to be overcome.

But the walnut so constantly projects personal dynamics and overproduces generalities based on things that have happened to it:

the walnut is trapped by personal rather than statistical or objective experience.

Being more vigilant about the flaws in our walnuts gives us a range of important advantages:

We can get better at noticing the potential errors in our judgments and ideas.

We start to avoid mistakes when we know mistakes are a constant active possibility.

Then, when we deal with other people, we can start to ask ourselves whether they might be acting from a walnut flaw, but not be aware of this.

This can make us both bolder about disagreeing with them

and also kinder and more generous in the face of their less than sensible behaviours.

And then, when we deal with large groups of people, we can be aware that the walnut does very weird things in packs

but that's OK

and no reason to panic if we find our ideas are meeting with resistance.

At heart, compensating for the faulty equipment that nature has given us is the task of what we call:

education, culture and civilisation.

The flaws in the walnut are also what makes it imperative that we try to act with kindness and tolerance:

we should at all times go easy on ourselves and others,

for we're trying to do some very difficult things around one another,

with the use of a highly troublesome and only intermittently accurate tool.

For more infomation >> The School of Life | La nuez defectuosa - Duration: 7:36.

-------------------------------------------

USB C ケーブルを安く賢く買おう Ocean C USB Type-Cケーブル - Duration: 3:42.

For more infomation >> USB C ケーブルを安く賢く買おう Ocean C USB Type-Cケーブル - Duration: 3:42.

-------------------------------------------

T3 - PC Security Settings

For more infomation >> T3 - PC Security Settings

-------------------------------------------

Mercedes-Benz E-Klasse 220 D LEASE EDITION Automaat - Duration: 0:59.

For more infomation >> Mercedes-Benz E-Klasse 220 D LEASE EDITION Automaat - Duration: 0:59.

-------------------------------------------

MAP6 DreamTV 1st Eps short ver Sub esp - Duration: 0:55.

For more infomation >> MAP6 DreamTV 1st Eps short ver Sub esp - Duration: 0:55.

-------------------------------------------

Le Premier ministre indien - Narendra Modi Grphyr Bio - Duration: 4:30.

Narendra Modi Damodardas (Gujarati, born September 17 1950) is an Indian politician who is the 14th and current Prime Minister

India, in operation since May 2014. He was the Prime Minister of Gujarat from 2001 to 2014 and was the member for Varanasi.

Modi, a member of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), is a Hindu nationalist and member of the Right Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS).

Born in a Gujarati family in Vadnagar, Modi has helped his father sell tea to childhood, and then led his own stall. It was presented to RSS

at the age of eight years, beginning a long association with the organization. He left home after completing his

degree from the school, in part because of an arranged marriage that was rejected. Modi traveled to India for two years, and visited a number of

religious centers. He returned to Gujarat and moved to Ahmedabad in 1969 or 1970. In 1971, he became a worker

full time for the RSS. During the state of emergency imposed in the country in 1975, Modi was forced into hiding. The RSS was assigned to BJP

in 1985, he held several positions in the party hierarchy until 2001, becoming secretary general

Modi was appointed Chief Minister of Gujarat in 2001, due to the poor health of Keshubhai Patel and poor public image after the earthquake

land in Bhuj. Modi was elected to the legislature shortly thereafter. His administration was seen as complicit in the Gujarat riots in 2002, or

otherwise criticized for its treatment, although a court has found no evidence to prosecute Modi. Its policies as chief minister

credited to encourage economic growth, have received praise and several industrial projects were started during his tenure. His administration

been criticized for failing to significantly improve the health indices, poverty and education in the state.

Modi led the BJP at the general election of 2014, which gave the party a majority in the Lok Sabha, the first time a single party had achieved since

1984. Modi himself was elected to parliament in Varanasi. Since taking office, the administration of Modi attempted to increase direct investment

foreigners in the Indian economy, increase infrastructure spending and reduce spending on health and protection programs

social. Modi has tried to improve the efficiency of the bureaucracy and centralized power by abolishing the planning commission. He began a

major sanitation campaign and weakened or eliminated environmental and labor laws. Modi remains a figure of controversy

nationally and internationally about its Hindu nationalist convictions and its role in the Gujarat riots in 2002

cited as evidence of an exclusive social program.

For more infomation >> Le Premier ministre indien - Narendra Modi Grphyr Bio - Duration: 4:30.

-------------------------------------------

Learn English Vocabulary Through Video: the Oxford 3000: Letter C Episode 02 - Duration: 2:52.

For more infomation >> Learn English Vocabulary Through Video: the Oxford 3000: Letter C Episode 02 - Duration: 2:52.

-------------------------------------------

Gigi D'Alessio e Giovanni Allevi suonano - Duration: 1:00.

For more infomation >> Gigi D'Alessio e Giovanni Allevi suonano - Duration: 1:00.

-------------------------------------------

817 - Les Feldick Bible Study - Lesson 1 Part 1 Book 69 - Redeem, Redeemed, Redemption - Part 1 - Duration: 28:30.

For more infomation >> 817 - Les Feldick Bible Study - Lesson 1 Part 1 Book 69 - Redeem, Redeemed, Redemption - Part 1 - Duration: 28:30.

-------------------------------------------

Watch Live Neil Gorsuch Takes The Stand For Senate Confirmation Hearing - Duration: 10:30.

Watch Live Neil Gorsuch Takes The Stand For Senate Confirmation Hearing

by Tyler Durden

On the role of Judges:

But to endure, our system of self-government requires judges to apply the text of our laws

as the people�s representatives enacted them.

So our judges, by design, play a critical�but limited�role.

They decide cases or controversies.

But in resolving those cases, they may look only to the laws the People wrote.

Judges aren�t free to re-write statutes to get results they believe are more just.

Judges aren�t free to reorder regulations to make them more fair.

And no, Judges aren�t free to �update� the Constitution.

That�s not their job.

That power is retained by the People, acting through their elected representatives.

When our Judges don�t respect this limited role, when they substitute their own policy

preferences for those in the legislative branch, they rob from the American people the right

to govern themselves.

As that happens, inch by inch and step by step, democracy is undermined, the carefully

constructed balance of power is upset, and individual liberty is lost.

On the independence of Gorsuch:

And if you are concerned about these things, as you should be: meet Judge Neil Gorsuch.

Fortunately for every American, we have before us today a nominee whose body of professional

work is defined by an unfailing commitment to these principles.

His grasp on the separation of powers�including judicial independence�enlivens his body

of work.

As he explains: �To the founders, the legislative and judicial powers were distinct by nature

and their separation was among the most important liberty-protecting devices of the constitutional

design.� * * *

For those who missed it, here is our preview from earlier this morning.

Later this morning at 11AM EST, Neil Gorsuch will take the stand before the Senate Judiciary

Committee for three full, fun-packed days of grueling testimony that will no doubt come

complete with several outbursts from disaffected liberal protesters and faux outrage from Democratic

committee members.

According to Judiciary Chair Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), the panel will hear opening statements

from committee members and Gorsuch on Monday, then begin questioning him on Tuesday.

Senate majority leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky has vowed that the Senate will vote

on the Gorsuch nomination before leaving April 8 for its Easter recess.

If confirmed, Gorsuch would take the bench in time to hear the last two weeks of courtroom

argument left in the current Supreme Court term.

And while Democrats have vowed to fight his nomination "tooth and nail", Tom Goldstein,

a Washington DC lawyer and publisher of the ScotusBlog, said it would be "shocking" if

Gorsuch wasn't confirmed in the coming weeks.

Per NBC:

"It would be shocking if Neil Gorsuch wasn't confirmed to the Supreme Court in the coming

weeks."

"The Democrats are committed to opposing him.

Their base is insisting on it, because of what happened to President Obama's nominee.

But the reality is, they just don't have the votes and don't have the goods."

Of course, many of the Democrats on the panel will undoubtedly take a hostile tone during

the hearings as they, like their leader Chuck Schumer, feel that Scalia's seat was 'stolen'

from the Obama administration after Republicans refused to hold a hearing on Obama's nominee,

Merrick Garland.

If this interview is any indication of how the hearings will be conducted then we could

be in for some fireworks:

For now, Gorsuch needs the support of at least eight Democrats to avoid a filibuster and

win confirmation in the 52-48 GOP majority Senate.

If Republicans can�t get Gorsuch past the 60-vote filibuster threshold, they could go

�nuclear� by removing the filibuster and eliminating not only Democrats� ability

to filibuster Gorsuch but other Supreme Court nominations to come.

With that, per The Hill, here are the 5 things to watch for during Gorsuch's testimony:

1.

How will Gorsuch handle pressure from Democrats to speak out against Trump?

Right out of the gate, Democrats are likely to ask Gorsuch what he thinks about Trump�s

recent attacks on the judges who have ruled against his travel ban.

Gorsuch called Trump�s remarks �disheartening and demoralizing� in a closed door meeting

with Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) last month, but refused the senator�s request

to make the statements publicly.

When a federal judge halted Trump�s original order banning Muslims from seven countries

from entering the United States, the president referred to him as a �so-called judge�

and called his order �ridiculous.�

�The opinion of this so-called judge, which essentially takes law-enforcement away from

our country, is ridiculous and will be overturned!� Trump tweeted.

As a member of the judiciary committee, the questions are likely to come from Blumenthal,

who said last month that Gorsuch must prove he has the courage and independence to stand

up to the president in public.

Now that two federal judges have blocked Trump's revised travel order, Gorsuch is sure to be

asked whether he thinks the ban is constitutional.

2.

Where do red-state Democrats fall on Gorsuch?

Since Republicans need 60 votes, the GOP will be looking to Democrats from swing or deep-red

states for the eight votes they need across the aisle.

Support could come from Sen. Heidi Heitkamp, who is running for re-election in North Dakota,

a reliably red state.

She was reportedly one of the few Democrats to publicly say she would oppose a filibuster.

There�s also Sen. Jon Tester of Montana, who has said he doesn�t believe Democrats

should play games with the confirmation.

Senators facing tough re-election fights, like Debbie Stabenow (Mich.), might also be

swayed.

Her state voted for the GOP presidential nominee in 2016 for the first time in decades, and

conservative groups are pressuring her not to block this nomination.

The National Republican Senatorial Committee ran an ad in Michigan during the University

of Michigan versus Michigan State men�s basketball game on ESPN last month.

The ad told viewers to call Stabenow and tell her to �put your country ahead of your party�

and allow a vote on Gorsuch, The Detroit News reported.

3.

How much does Gorsuch reveal about his views?

Gorsuch�s record shows very little, if anything, about where he stands on conservative issues

like abortion and money in politics, while lawmakers could also press him on his position

on gun rights.

Democrats will likely ask Gorsuch about whether he�d vote to overturn the landmark abortion

case Roe v. Wade, which legalized abortion nationally.

Some have said the book he wrote in 2006, �The Future of Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia,�

signals that Gorsuch is anti-abortion.

In the book, Gorsuch premised the argument for retaining current laws that ban the practice

�on the idea that all human beings are intrinsically valuable and the intentional taking of human

life by private persons in always wrong.�

Gorsuch is also likely to be asked about his views on Citizens United v. the Federal Election

Commission.

Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) compares Gorsuch to Chief Justice John Roberts,

who was calm and careful when he answered questions during his confirmation process.

But, Schumer said, Roberts went on to become one of the most activist justices the country

has seen, voting with the conservative majority in cases like Citizen United.

Sen. Dianne Feinstein's (D-Calif.) office has in recent days also gone after Gorsuch

on the issue of guns, with a release Friday highlighting what it called a "troubling record

on gun safety."

The top Senate Judiciary Committee Democrat's office highlighted portions of past cases

involving the possession of firearms for convicted felons or domestic violence abusers to label

the judge a "pro-gun extremist."

4.

Will Gorsuch give liberals any ammunition?

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) is confidant Gorsuch will get confirmed.

�He�s very, very hard to oppose,� McConnell told Bret Baier during an appearance on Fox

News�s Special Report last month.

But Democrats will be looking for anything they can use against him.

Question are likely to come about recent reports in The New York Times on Gorsuch�s ties

to conservative billionaire Philip Anschutz and work defending George W. Bush� anti-terror

policies.

5.

Will Gorsuch keep his composure?

Both sides know that composure, style and tone all play into a nominee�s chances of

winning confirmation.

Democrats aiming to draw some emotion from him are likely to play up the human impact

of his rulings.

Schumer and Blumenthal held a press conference last week with people Gorsuch ruled against

in three different cases while on the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals.

In one case, he sided with a trucking company that fired a driver for abandoning his cargo

after his truck broke down in freezing temperatures.

In another case, Gorsuch ruled against a professor at the University of Kansas who was battling

cancer.

He said the school did not have to give her more than six months of sick leave under the

Rehabilitation Act.

He also wrote the majority opinion in a case that prevented a nurse from seeking compensation

from Medtronics for injuries she claimed were caused by the company�s improper, off-label

promotion of its Infuse bone-graft device.

For more infomation >> Watch Live Neil Gorsuch Takes The Stand For Senate Confirmation Hearing - Duration: 10:30.

-------------------------------------------

Ghost in the Shell

For more infomation >> Ghost in the Shell

-------------------------------------------

104th Fighter Wing conducting nighttime flights out of Barnes - Duration: 0:26.

A 29 YEAR OLD MAN FROM HOLYOKE.

HE WAS ALSO TAKEN TO THE

HOSPITAL FOR EVALUATION.

ANC:

IF YOU LIVE NEAR BARNES AIR

NATIONAL GUARD BASE IN

WESTFIELD, YOU MAY

BE HEARING THE ROAR OF JETS OVER

NEXT COUPLE OF NIGHTS.

THIS IS BECAUSE THE 104TH

FIGHTER WING IS CONDUCTING

NIGHTTIME TRAINING

FLIGHTS.

104TH SPOKESWOMAN LT. COL.

BRENDA HENDRICKSEN TOLD 22NEWS

THAT NIGHT-

TIME TAKEOFFS AND LANDINGS WILL

BE TAKING PLACE FROM TONIGHT

THROUGH

THURSDAY NIGHT.

FLIGHTS WILL STOP AROUND 9

O'CLOCK EACH NIGHT. NIGHTTIME

No comments:

Post a Comment