-------------------------------------------
Universally Preferable Behaviour Refuted (Stefan Molyneux Debunked) - Duration: 16:04.
I have the distinct feeling that I'm going to aggravate a few Molyneux fans with this
video, but despite the fact that I enjoy a lot of Molyneux's work, a flawed argument
is a flawed argument, and hence, this is Universally Preferable Behaviour – Debunked.
Throughout history there have been many attempts to prove that objective moral values exist,
and of course, most of these attempts have been via the Divine Command Theory of countless
religions, but there have also been some attempts by those who don't subscribe to the supernatural,
and Molyneux's Universally Preferable Behaviour, otherwise known as UPB, is one of them.
So, for those of you who're unaware or in need of a recap, UPB is, to those who accept
it, the definitive answer to all moral questions, and it alone can tell us what is really right
and really wrong… it can tell us what we ought to value.
Hence, if true, it's a very big deal – it's the answer that has avoided humanity's greatest
minds for thousands of years, and yet Molyneux has found it - the cure to ethical cancer.
Now the syllogistic form of Molyneux's UPB is fairly lengthy, containing many premises
that are, in my opinion, not necessarily needed, but I do appreciate that they are indeed very
useful for refreshing language and clarifying definitions, and so if you'd like to see
the whole argument then here it is on screen, and I've also linked to it in the description.
However, for the purpose of this video, I'm going to focus on the sixth, seventh and eighth
premises, because that's where the crux of the argument lays… and it goes as follows:
"Preferences" are required for life, thought, language and debating.
Debating requires that both parties hold "truth" to be both objective and universally preferable.
Thus the very act of debating contains an acceptance of universally preferable behaviour
(UPB).
From here, Molyneux goes on to assert that because the very act of debating requires
acceptance of UPB – that is, because premise seven is valid, the only question to be asked
is how theories regarding UPB can be declared as true… which, to be fair, is a legitimate
question if only the seventh premise is valid… but it's not – and I'll explain why
shortly.
Before that, I want point out that to his credit, Molyneux both recognises and appreciates
that premise seven is both the most important and contentious of his argument, and so he
graciously offers us "Five Proofs of UPB" in the attempt to substantiate it – and
it's these proofs that I'm going to debunk in this video, because, it is these proofs
that the proponents of UPB predominantly refer to when attempting to justify this premise.
So, to get straight to it, the first proof that Molyneux offers is the assertion that,
"if I argue against the proposition that universally preferable behaviour is valid,
I have already shown my preference for truth over falsehood – as well as a preference
for correcting those who speak falsely.
Saying that there is no such thing as universally preferable behaviour is like shouting in someone's
ear that sound does not exist – it is innately self-contradictory."
And the syllogistic rendition that he provides us with goes as follows: The proposition is:
the concept "universally preferable behaviour" must be valid.
Arguing against the validity of universally preferable behaviour demonstrates universally
preferable behaviour.
Therefore no argument against the validity of universally preferable behaviour can be
valid.
So what exactly is wrong with Molyneux's first proof?
Well, to but it bluntly, premise two is simply incorrect.
It's a False Premise.
If I state a preference for truth over falsehood when debating UPB, this does not mean that
I have a preference for truth over falsehood in all things.
For example, if there was a scenario in which I had to choose between knowing the truth
but permanently diminishing the wellbeing of organisms, or not knowing the truth but
permanently improving the wellbeing of organisms, I would choose the latter every time – I
would choose falsehood over truth because I value wellbeing over truth.
Furthermore, and to quote Common Sense Atheism's review of UPB, of which I have linked to in
the description and highly recommend, "even if I did have a preference for truth over
falsehood, it would not be a universal preference, because many other people do not share my
preference for truth over falsehood."
To illustrate this through another example, while I might value truth over falsehood when
it comes to the question of if we will be reunited with our deceased loved ones when
we die, another person may value falsehood over truth as a result of them valuing comfort
over truth.
The point being is that we all value concepts such as truth, wellbeing and comfort differently
to one another, and it's only when we have a conflict of preferences – that is, a choice
between one preference or another – that the subjectivity of our preferences and values
is explicitly exposed…
For me, wellbeing trumps all other values, for you, it might be truth, comfort, or something
else entirely, but what is for sure, is that what we value personally is not universal.
What's more, and to again quote Common Sense Atheism's review, "Molyneux seems to be
saying that objective moral values exist because we have the opinion that moral values exist,
which is not the same as demonstrating that moral values really exist"…
Even if everybody in all circumstances, in all places and at all times asserted that
the moon was made of cheese, this wouldn't make it so…
Hence, Molyneux's first proof is invalid because its second premise is simply incorrect;
it's a crocked foundation; a False Premise.
The second proof that Molyneux offers is the following: All organisms require universally
preferred behaviour to live.
Man is a living organism.
Therefore all living men are alive due to the practice of universally preferred behaviour.
Therefore any argument against universally preferable behaviour requires an acceptance
and practice of universally preferred behaviour.
Therefore no argument against the existence of universally preferable behaviour can be
valid.
So, where to start?
Well, premise one is Begging the Question, because the conclusion of the argument is
implicitly included within the premise, making the entire argument circular.
Absent the fluff, the premise is implicitly asserting that because all living organisms
require UPB to live, all living organisms can't argue against UPB because they are
alive… which, again, is profoundly circular.
To illustrate this further, here's a comparison with another Begging the Question fallacy:
Steve asks: "How do you know that the bible is divinely inspired?"
William responds: "Because it says so in the third chapter of II Timothy that 'all scripture
is given by divine inspiration of God.'"
Steve asks: "How do you know that all organisms require UPB to live?"
Stefan responds: "Because organisms are alive because they practice UPB"…
Hence, premise one is Begging the Question, and consequently, premise three, four and
five are unsubstantiated…
Furthermore, notice that premise three states "practice of UPB", but premise four states
"acceptance and practice of UPB"… again, I don't dislike Molyneux, but really?
Really?
Moving on, let's take on proof number three: For a scientific theory to be valid, it must
be supported by empirical observation.
If the concept of "universally preferable behaviour" is valid, then mankind should
believe in universally preferable behaviour.
All men believe in universally preferable behaviour.
Therefore empirical evidence exists to support the validity of universally preferable behaviour
– and the existence of such evidence opposes the proposition that universally preferable
behaviour is not valid.
Starting with premise two, we have another Begging the Question fallacy, as it literally
includes the conclusion of the argument within it... in fact, it's as circular as saying
"if the bible is valid then mankind should believe in the bible"… it's a ridiculous
premise.
And while we're on the topic of ridiculous premises, what on earth is going with premise
three?
Even if all men practiced UPB (which they don't), the claim that all men believe in
UPB is just wrong... it's that simple; it's just factually and demonstrably wrong – a
False Premise.
I don't believe in UPB, therefore not all men believe in UPB.
And as for premise four, if stated simply, it is asserting that because there is some
evidence that suggests that UPB valid, UPB is therefore valid... which is just bizarre…
and it's another False Premise!
It holds as much validity as stating that because there is some evidence for Hinduism,
Hinduism must be true...
And what's more, and to once again quote Common Sense Atheism, "none of these statements follow
from any of the others!
It's like reading a book that says: For Tyler Cowen to be right about the economy, he must
have evidence.
If theism is true, it is immoral to be unaware that gods exist.
Every culture has believed in gods.
Therefore, all milk is nervous.
What about proof four?
How does it fair?
Well, it goes as follows: Choices are almost infinite.
Most human beings make very similar choices.
Therefore not all choices can be equal.
Therefore universally preferable choices must be valid.
You know, it's strange, because Molyneux is a very articulate and educated person,
but when it comes to syllogistic arguments he's just… awful.
For starters, premise one – the claim that choices are almost infinite, can only be considered
true if every micro-variation of every choice is defined as its own choice.
For example, if someone offered you either an apple or an orange, you would have several
choices available to you; to name but a few, you could take the apple, take the orange,
take neither, impolitely take both, etc.
You would have many choices, but you would not have an almost infinite amount of choices.
Unless, and here is where the pedantic variations come in, you define every variation of every
choice as its own choice – such as waiting two seconds to take the orange, or waiting
two-point-one seconds to take the orange, or waiting two-point-two seconds to the orange,
and so on and so forth.
Furthermore, the very idea that we have "choice" requires the implicit acceptance of libertarian
free will (and with that, the rejection of hard determinism), which, sorry folks, the
evidence doesn't support… but let's not get into that here – it's not necessary.
Moving on, in premise three, the word "equal" is critically ambiguous – causing the argument
to commit an Ambiguity Fallacy.
What does Molyneux mean by "equal"?
Does he mean popular?
If so, why would that mater?
Throughout history misogyny and racism has been incredibly popular, but that doesn't
mean they're somehow right or valid.
And as for premise four, stated simply, it doesn't follow from the other three premises.
The fact that humans make similar choices doesn't prove that certain choices are universally
objective…
And finally, we get to Molyneux's fifth proof, and it goes as follows: Organisms succeed
by acting upon universally preferable behaviour.
Man is the most successful organism.
Therefore man must have acted most successfully on the basis of universally preferable behaviour.
Man's mind is his most distinctive organ.
Therefore man's mind must have acted most successfully on the basis of universally preferable
behaviour.
Therefore universally preferable behaviour must be valid.
Where to start?
Premise one is again Begging the Question… in fact, it's almost identical to the Second
Proof's first premise – that "all organisms require universally preferred behaviour to
live", and it carries all of the same problems.
As for premise two - the assertion that man is the most successful species, this is just
childishly absurd... because it's Arbitrarily Assigning Significance.
What exactly are humans the most successful at?
It's not neck length, because the giraffe is more successful than us in this area, it's
not population, because ants are more successful than us in this area, it's not age, because
arctic whales are more successful than us in this area, and it's not reproduction, because
rabbits are more successful than us in this area…
So what is it?
Brainpower?
How arbitrary… why should we accept that success is defined by how much brainpower
an organism has?
This isn't just taking the biscuit; it's taken the whole damn jar!
Now of course, to state a caveat that I add to a lot of my videos – the flaws and fallacies
that I've risen throughout this video are not exhaustive – there are many more.
But, the one's that I've risen are more enough to completely invalidate Molyneux's
Five Proofs of UPB, and, by extension, UPB entirely.
So, to recap: The First Proof is flawed because: Premise two is a False Premise.
The Second Proof is flawed because: Premise one is Begging the Question, and; Premise
four unjustifiably smuggles in the word "acceptance".
The Third Proof is flawed because: Premise two is Begging the Question; Premise three
is a False Premise, and; Premise four is a False Premise.
The Fourth Proof is flawed because: Premise one is either pedantic or a False Premise;
Premise three commits an Ambiguity Fallacy, and; Premise four is a Non Sequitur.
And finally (thanks for sticking around people!), the Fifth Proof is flawed because: Premise
one is Begging the Question, and; Premise two is Arbitrarily Assigning Significance.
Anyhow, as always, thank you kindly for the view, and here's an overwhelmingly powerful
argument to consider: Organisms require a subscription to Rationality Rules to live.
You are alive.
Therefore you are alive because you are subscribed to Rationality Rules.
-------------------------------------------
Guys Obsessed w/ The Bach...
For more infomation >> Guys Obsessed w/ The Bach...-------------------------------------------
Café Therapy - Pepa Šedivý - SANANIM - Duration: 6:22.
Talking with Pepa Sedivy about SANANIM and Café Therapy
My name is Pepa Sedivy, I work in SANANIM 10 years.
I work in the Drug Information Centre.
We sometimes do events like exhibitions, public debates ...
we think now about extending these debates, for example a debate with one specific person,
And why we do it? Because when I entered in SANANIM
and it was really entrance to this whole new field,
because previously I was working in completely different field of work.
After time I was really sorry, that previously I had no idea that something like SANANIM could exist
That was the first thing, but on the other hand
all the things about drugs were unknown for me, I was afraid of it, I was the kind of person,
that when hears "junkie" sees somebody really dirty, nasty, smelly person,
that is hanging around on the streets.
And I found that this is not true, I found that drug users are not junkies,
that it is not their fault that they ended like this
and that SANANIM is doing good things.
So I wanted to continue on the unfinished work.
I started to look at things from different perspective,
I wanted to change people's opinion and attitude,
so when they hear "drugs" they would not condemn it
and take it as something normal.
So that's why we do public events,
that's why we have Café Therapy
and we try to be as organization to be open to public
even it's hard on the subject of drugs and addiction,
because it's unpopular topic,
but we would like to be at least little bit "normal".
Café Therapy is a space, it is a changing place actually.
It was former pub and restaurant,
now we try to focus more on meeting of people together, more community place.
But the basis of a café with good food remains.
We have lounge area here, we have one bigger room,
it is possible to make diverse events here,
we learned how to work with a non smoking area, we rebuild it for debates and so on.
So yes, Café Therapy is beginning to be a sexy place,
where you can stop by, when you go from work,
where you can meet friends in the evening, eat some good and cheap food and continue to some party.
We want this place to be good space to exist.
And we have stable Wi-Fi finally, so you can work here.
We do employ here clients after treatment, for example in therapeutic community,
and they try to return to regular life.
And when you come from the treatment, you go through hard times.
You have to find work, you have to find housing,
you have to find friends, that are not using drugs,
and if you used drugs for ten or more years,
then all your bonds are broken and you are alone.
So SANANIM offers sheltered housing in the Aftercare
for half year or sometimes for the whole year.
And employment in Café Therapy for half year.
So the client does not have to solve everything in one moment.
Because he would probably end on the streets again.
I think that even a very healthy person would have severe troubles if he or she
would need in one moment work and housing. That would be tough.
So for our clients it's even harder.
So this is a place to, where clients train to go to work regularly, to have responsibility,
to have the obligation to go to work and so on.
And the food we cook here is often from our own resources.
In summer we have goat cheese made in the therapeutic communities,
also herbs, vegetables and fruits, seasonal goods.
It is not "bio", but it's homemade, really lovely homemade.
And now something about psychotherapy...
You know, psychotherapy is peculiar.
She (psychotherapy) changes the human body,
she doesn't only heals it, but she also fundamentally changes it.
And that's something fearful but also beautiful about her.
I always wanted to say this on camera.
-------------------------------------------
FINDET NERO - KAPLAN VS. PRECHT FEAT. ATTILA - Duration: 4:11.
For more infomation >> FINDET NERO - KAPLAN VS. PRECHT FEAT. ATTILA - Duration: 4:11. -------------------------------------------
Guess it or Wear it Challenge - Duration: 9:23.
What is that?
Hey guys, I'm Marissa and I'm Brookie and today we're doing the Guess it or Wear it
Challenge.
We have our yucky clothes on we have our hair in a messy bun and we have our blindfolds.
And if this is your first time watching, welcome!
Make sure to hit that subscribe button down below and ring the notification bell so you
don't skip a beat.
Check out our instagram down below and check out Brookie's Musically right here.
We are going to be doing rock, paper, scissor to see who get A and who gets B. Whoever wins,
they get to pick.
ready?
K, go! back to back.
are we doing rock, paper, scissors, shoot?
Yeah, okay.
rock, paper, scissors, shoot.
rock, paper, scissors, shoot.
rock, paper, scissors, shoot.
Which one do you pick?
A? or B?
Okay, here is the first item.
Wait, i recognize that smell.
it does not smell good.
Wait, let me smell it again.
Oh, I don't know.
Is it an olive?
no not an olive. is it an olive?
what is it? ik.
Spagettios!! what!?! ok, i get to pur it on her head.
oh my gosh. ok. ready?
oh my gosh. wait wait wait.
what the heck. ok. go? are you trying the whole thing? it's going to be freezing.
oh!!!!
Ewwww! ok. thats enough.
oh my gosh. the next item for Brookily to guess.
ok. ready?
oh what is that?
I have spagettipos dripping off of me.
what is that?
what is that?
ok. what do you think it is? um, baby food?
no.
okay, take it off.
chicken noodle soup baby! oh wait, i need, ohhhhh! yeah, ok, take a look at the inside
of it.
it looks like brains.
you gotta pour it on m bun. head straight.
whoooooo.
oh, stop it.
stop flinging it.
i know, it kind of stinks.
give me my next thing.
it's right here.
eww. wait, it smells disgusting.
it is tomato soup?
nope. white corn.
wait, no, I want to see inside.
i was just sitting on that.
it's going to be nasty.
this is the next thing.
and it looks like that.
ready?
tomato soup?
no.
chilli! lokk at this.
it looks like dog poop. ready?
I have no idea.
what is that.
that smells good.
eww.
I have no clue.
I just have no clue.
what is it? popcorn?
nope.
Mandrine oranges.
that has like juice in it.
ok.
I'm itchy right now.
ok. it's in my ear. it's in my ear.
oh.oh.oh. orange juice.
yeah.
ok, she has to dump it on me.
that is so cold.
I can't smell anything.
chocolate syrup?
nope. chocolate milk.
I guessed chocolate.
nope. you got to do chocolate milk.
all the chocolate off.
oh, what are you doing? oh, what is that?
coconut?
no.
It is applesauce.
head straight.
It's splattering.
thank you.
ready?
my turn.
mmmm that's good.
k. you have to put it to my nose.
What are you doing?
Whipped cream?
I knew that smell.
I know that smell.
ok, you get it on your head.
It's so sticky.
It's going to go like this.
ready/ come on , just dump it on my face.
this doesn't smell like anything.
what the.... what is that?
ok, take a guess.
is it almond milk?
no, it's pudding.
ok. ready?
Whoa, it just like whoooo.
I want some on my face.
ok, it's kinda gone.
thanks for watching.
Hope you enjoyed the video because I know I didn't.
I'm so glad I didn't get any on my face.
she got the most of it.
pk, but I got the worst of the Australian candy chalenge.
I think this is fair game.
Tears of applesauce.
ok. bye.
-------------------------------------------
Kong Skull Island Trailer For more infomation >> Kong Skull Island Trailer-------------------------------------------
Rep, Slaughter Opposes Legislation that Would Undermine Genetic Privacy Protections - Duration: 1:12.
what you talking about civil rights I'm
extraordinarily troubled today I that a
bill that i worked on for 14 years
called the Genetic Non-Discrimination Act which
protected everybody-- everybody has bad genes--
protected them from losing their job or their
health insurance because of the genetic
makeup because of that law, now
genetic science has moved much further
because people willing to be subject to
the research and now it's the basis of a
number of cancer treatments and much
more to come in this whole science of
genetics is really pretty remarkable it
took me 14 years to pass that bill of
health insurers didn't care for it like
a lot of people thought I was talking about
cloning it was really tough lift that
we finally got it through the Senate
President George W. Bush and said all
along he would be happy
sign it. He even mentioned it once in a
State of the Union speech. He certainly did keep his
word on that today that. Today that is being removed
in the Education Committee, being taken away
as an unnecessary regulation
-------------------------------------------
Keith on how LoL hurt his performance in school, and his thoughts on Rick Fox and Midlet - Duration: 3:46.
So I actually did--I did go to college.
I went to UC Santa Cruz, but I think, for most of my high school career, I slacked a
lot and I think that's the reason I went--like, I don't consider Santa Cruz a prestigious
school or anything.
It's kind of average, I feel like.
And I think I subbed in LCS in my senior year, and I think--it's mostly my fault, but I definitely
didn't do well in school my last year, so I think that's a big reason why I didn't get
into a better school.
And I think that, yeah, if I didn't play League, I think I would have gone to school for sure,
and to probably a better school like UCLA or Berkeley, something like that.
So that quote in your yearbook is true?
Yes, I remember pretty well.
It was actually--it's not really what I said.
I said--it says, "Don't play League of Legends; focus on college applications"--something
like that, right?
I really just said, "Don't play games."
They changed my wording, dude.
It's not fair.
That's good to know.
So it's true.
I think I could have gone to a much better school if not for League, but for sure I don't
regret what I did.
As it turns out, I feel really good about where I am.
Rick Fox is a really passionate guy for esports--or not for esports, for everything.
He founded Echo Fox last year and since then, he's been--I think he's been a really good
owner.
He really listens to what his players want and what they need, and he's been really supportive
of that, and I appreciate that.
Right now, I think to be better teammate, I should be more accountable for myself and
as well as my team, because I think what makes a good team is having standards for everyone
that, if broken, there needs to be some kind of punishment.
I think I should be harder on myself so that I'm harder on my teammates as well, in terms
of practice schedule.
When I subbed for Piglet, that was two years ago, about.
I thought he obviously had a rough start.
I think he had some--he had a different play style and--a very selfish play style when
he started, and then he grew.
He changed a lot and become a really good player the next year, I think, But this year,
so far, I think he's been playing pretty bad as an AD carry.
He does not really--I don't think he knows his job that well as a utility AD, and it's
mostly because that role has changed as marksman.
And I don't think he adapted well at all.
So I think that's mostly the reason why he changed to mid lane, and I guess after beating
Immortals, he looks much better for sure.
Right now, I just want to say to my fans--er, Echo Fox fans--that we're trying every day,
really trying hard to win.
And I think right now for our team, it doesn't feel like--I don't think it feels like for
anyone that we're getting stomped and we are just straight up worse than other teams.
We really just need to smooth out our weak areas, and I think we can definitely still
make playoffs.
So keep on supporting us please.
-------------------------------------------
Here & Now for Wednesday March 8 2017 - Duration: 1:05:28.
For more infomation >> Here & Now for Wednesday March 8 2017 - Duration: 1:05:28. -------------------------------------------
Guess it or Wear it Challenge - Duration: 9:23.What is that?
Hey guys, I'm Marissa and I'm Brookie and today we're doing the Guess it or Wear it
Challenge.
We have our yucky clothes on we have our hair in a messy bun and we have our blindfolds.
And if this is your first time watching, welcome!
Make sure to hit that subscribe button down below and ring the notification bell so you
don't skip a beat.
Check out our instagram down below and check out Brookie's Musically right here.
We are going to be doing rock, paper, scissor to see who get A and who gets B. Whoever wins,
they get to pick.
ready?
K, go! back to back.
are we doing rock, paper, scissors, shoot?
Yeah, okay.
rock, paper, scissors, shoot.
rock, paper, scissors, shoot.
rock, paper, scissors, shoot.
Which one do you pick?
A? or B?
Okay, here is the first item.
Wait, i recognize that smell.
it does not smell good.
Wait, let me smell it again.
Oh, I don't know.
Is it an olive?
no not an olive. is it an olive?
what is it? ik.
Spagettios!! what!?! ok, i get to pur it on her head.
oh my gosh. ok. ready?
oh my gosh. wait wait wait.
what the heck. ok. go? are you trying the whole thing? it's going to be freezing.
oh!!!!
Ewwww! ok. thats enough.
oh my gosh. the next item for Brookily to guess.
ok. ready?
oh what is that?
I have spagettipos dripping off of me.
what is that?
what is that?
ok. what do you think it is? um, baby food?
no.
okay, take it off.
chicken noodle soup baby! oh wait, i need, ohhhhh! yeah, ok, take a look at the inside
of it.
it looks like brains.
you gotta pour it on m bun. head straight.
whoooooo.
oh, stop it.
stop flinging it.
i know, it kind of stinks.
give me my next thing.
it's right here.
eww. wait, it smells disgusting.
it is tomato soup?
nope. white corn.
wait, no, I want to see inside.
i was just sitting on that.
it's going to be nasty.
this is the next thing.
and it looks like that.
ready?
tomato soup?
no.
chilli! lokk at this.
it looks like dog poop. ready?
I have no idea.
what is that.
that smells good.
eww.
I have no clue.
I just have no clue.
what is it? popcorn?
nope.
Mandrine oranges.
that has like juice in it.
ok.
I'm itchy right now.
ok. it's in my ear. it's in my ear.
oh.oh.oh. orange juice.
yeah.
ok, she has to dump it on me.
that is so cold.
I can't smell anything.
chocolate syrup?
nope. chocolate milk.
I guessed chocolate.
nope. you got to do chocolate milk.
all the chocolate off.
oh, what are you doing? oh, what is that?
coconut?
no.
It is applesauce.
head straight.
It's splattering.
thank you.
ready?
my turn.
mmmm that's good.
k. you have to put it to my nose.
What are you doing?
Whipped cream?
I knew that smell.
I know that smell.
ok, you get it on your head.
It's so sticky.
It's going to go like this.
ready/ come on , just dump it on my face.
this doesn't smell like anything.
what the.... what is that?
ok, take a guess.
is it almond milk?
no, it's pudding.
ok. ready?
Whoa, it just like whoooo.
I want some on my face.
ok, it's kinda gone.
thanks for watching.
Hope you enjoyed the video because I know I didn't.
I'm so glad I didn't get any on my face.
she got the most of it.
pk, but I got the worst of the Australian candy chalenge.
I think this is fair game.
Tears of applesauce.
ok. bye.
-------------------------------------------
Anonymous family gives Tulsa custodian truck to keep him working at local school - Duration: 2:10.
For more infomation >> Anonymous family gives Tulsa custodian truck to keep him working at local school - Duration: 2:10. -------------------------------------------
NOM NOM NOM Trying Japanese Candy [2/3] - Duration: 13:49.
ME: It isn't that bad.
J: See?!
ME: Even though my face tells another story.
But really it isn't that bad.
It is really just sour.
It could simply be the inner part of a center shock or something similar.
J: Center shock stuffing?
Oh that is big packaging. JJ: mhhh they look like Nimm 2
It does taste like bubble gum in the after taste.
J: Oh Mango taste. Mango !
JJ: That's how it looks.
J: *trying japanese accent* Mitsuya cider
JJ: Looks like some... some Nimm 2 Bonbons
Or they are simply BonBons
J: Open it like that.
JJ: Why? But that's how it goes.
J+JJ: Yepp that's how it works.
J: I want Mango! Where is Mango?
MANGO!!!
There is Mango <3
That is cool. ^_^
There are little Mangos on it.
ME: What is the pink one supposed to be?
JJ: Peach i think.
J: Yes it is Peach.
ME: And this is apple right?
J+JJ: No ME: No? :c
J: That is ...i don't know.
JJ: Lemon?
JJ: It is leaf flavour ;)
ME: Here.
J: Blueberry?
ME: Maybe it is Matcha again.
J: They are Bonbons for sure.
ME: Lol... They look really good.
They simply look like little Bonbons
J: Yehh like normal Bonbons.
ME: Mhh they are tasty <3
J: Ohhh Mango is... You can really taste it.
JJ: it does fucking smell like mango.
ME: I don't really know how to identify it but...
JJ: It smells fucking nice.
J: Like fizzy powder!
ME: What was it supposed to be again? The pink one?
J: Peach i think. Right?
ME: Yeah now that you said it.
J: Yeah well i would say Mango...
ME: My brain couldn't make sense of it.
J: Peach, Blueberry and
Or grape and???
JJ: Lemon.
ME: But it is tasty really tasty.
JJ: I have to try a green one.
J: They are delicous.
JJ: They should taste like lemon.
If not i'm gonna kill someone.
J: Who/What will you kill?
JJ: The packaging.
ME: I still need some time until i finshed this up.
J: Yupp.
ME: It is a bonbon after all.
Glazed in in in .... something.
J: Slowly comes to an end.
ME: You don't have to chew them.
J: Ok listen up. We now have to taste the terrible one.
JJ: Nooo we don't have to. :/
J: We have to.
I already tried it and I found it disgusting.
J:It has... JJ: Why'd you bring it then?
J: So you too can taste that digusting one.
And i don't really know what it is anymore.
It is similar to a paste
It really has a strange constistency
ME: Cranberry paste or something ...
J: Like... Yes.
ME: Or something else.
JJ: It somehow doesn't taste like lemon :C
J: But now it is really sticky and clay like.
When you eat it.
And the family I was staying with
they all loved it.
JJ: Eww terrible.
J: I don't know how to open it.
Noo why do you cut it ?
ME: I think my knifes are simply dull.
With those you won't even get through.
J+JJ: Sure!!!
ME: I am surprised.
I can still get another one...
J: You also could have poked it and squeezed it out.
JJ: Doesn't looks squeezable.
It rather looks disgusting.
J: True.
ME: Lol you CAN squeeze it out.
J: Yes that's what i told you.
ME: What's that?
JJ: It does look like Cola.
J: Show it to the cam. It's really funny.
ME: Is it similar to marmelade?
J: Take a bite.
JJ: I rather stick to my bonbons.
ME: Doesn't smell bad or anything.
J: But the bonbon is still so tasty :/
ME: I'm gonna cut it...
J: I don't want to swallow the bonbon :C
ME: Then put it aside and eat it later.
JJ: The second bonbon is not so tasty.
The Mango one was yummy.
ME: The consistency is strange and
I absolutely can't tell what it is supposed to be.
JJ: I don't want to.
ME: Somehow like Chocolate.
I think it's chocolate-ish
Or maybe my taste buds simply went crazy.
But
I don't think it is that bad.
But still can't say what it really is.
Could also be something....
Consistency is somewhat floury
And also similar to jelly ...well it is one but
It isn't so bad.
J: We to eat all here.
That's what we are paid for.
JJ: It really tastes floury.
ME: It simply tastes like ...
Don't know.
I couldn't really make sense of what it is.
J: That' the case with most of what i ate there
still don't know what it was.
But most of it was really good.
ME: Ohh we have something and it has something written in english on it.
J: UPDATE it dissolved a little more
It is now a little yellow piss stream.
Doesn't look yummy.
ME: The next i took from the bag is this.
This little bonbon thingy.
Well maybe it isn't a bonbon but well...
and there is written something in english
and now i read it out
J: DUDE don't you ruin the bag!
ME: Enjoy the superb...
J: That belongs to the bag dude it's the bottom.
ME: May i read it now?
J: NOOOOO!
ME: OK :C
Enjoy the superb taste of cookies
made with the finest ingredients
ok
J+JJ: COOKIES!? o.o
ME: Yes!
It'll be a cookie it feel like it.
So i now open it.
J: And if there is no cookie we have to sue them.
ME: The fuck it is a cookie!!! O.O
I didn't expected that.
Looking like that.
JJ: Looks weird.
ME: Yes a little weird.
On one side there is already leaking chocolate i think.
I will cut it into 3 pieces
one...
JJ: I want a little one.
ME: Nope!
JJ: Shit :C
ME: It already crumbles!!!
J: Mate ? Lucky it's your apartment.
ME: Yes... JJ: That is no cookie ME: ahh damn :C
JJ: That is no fucking cookie.
Over there is the spit bucket.
It smells bad i don't want to eat it.
ME: It is not really a cookie.
But more like such croissants you can buy at the super market
J: Those chocolate rolls.
ME: ...but harder.
Yeah well I think it was laying around for a bit too long.
And that's why it isn't that yummy anymore.
JJ: Yeah ...it is kinda disgusting....
ME: True it really isn't the best.
Really isn't my favorite to get again.
JJ: You just got that stuff and afterwards was Philipp's turn
ME: So Jojo's turn.
J: Sorrrry
JJ: Screw this bottom piece.
J: Ey dude!
ME: We can add it back later.
J: I have a japanese IKEA bag
there is IKEA.jp written on it.
Yeah that both the same but this one is open already.
Show the full one.
ME: That's the full one. That's how it looks.
J: All of the children in Japan love that stuff.
ME+J: And those are fruit chews.
J: And those really taste really good.
And in the family I stayed with ...
in the super market are those little boxes
where it is stored in
at the checkout. You know?
And everyone of us got one of those boxes.
Meaning I had like 12 of those for me.
And those are really good.
I love this little packaging there is so much little cute stuff on it.
ME: Yes that is nice and I think they could do that in Germany as well
but they don't have an eye here for that.
J: True! In Japan everything is "kawaii" Yoo!
ME: Yeah well look at this "kawaii" thing on here.
Does it even focus? Now it does!
J: Filled with white stuff.
ME: I don't like it as much as the others do.
But you could get used to it but it still tastes like chemicals.
J: Yes! That's what I like about it most.
ME: It kills you from inside.
Arrghh it's stuck to my teeth.
JJ: There is written fucking death on that packaging.
J: PIKA!
I think those are normal gum
but there is a Pikatchu on it
and that's why i had to buy them.
ME: They are called Xylitol arn't they? J: Yes.
ME: Then there will be Xylit in them that sugar alternative.
J: Oh my God!!! COLORED!
Colored shit <3
ME: let's take them all out and have a look at them.
Ohh there are Pokemons on it <3
JJ: I want the green one.
J: Pokemon check
Choose one! It's like the start of every Pokemon game.
ME: I don't cover my eyes but i want the blue one.
Oh i got it without the wrapper.
I got fucking Pikatchu :3
J: I want the pink one!
JJ: I got Merill.
ME: Lol my Pikatchu sleeps.
J: I don't even know how that one is called :C
ME: You have to imagine it like that. Wrapped around every gum strip
and it is like a little collectible picture.
JJ: You can hang it in your apartment.
ME: probably will do.
J: That is nice.
ME: They can already see it.
J: Fox or a little fire piece of shit.
Screw the new edtions.
ME: Do they taste good? J: No!
JJ: Tastes like nothing.
ME: They turn really fresh i think.
You instantly have the fresh kick.
But it agin tastes like washing powder
J: I think it tastes like nothing.
ME: I think my does taste so much like washing powder
J: Mate? Did you snack something funny yesterday?
ME: I think i snacked washing powder.
Oh no. :C
Maybe I should flush my mouth.
Not a fan of this gum.
J: Smell it. That smells like washing powder.
ME: Yes! And that's how mine tasted.
Not a fan of this.
J: Maybe the gum factory is next to a washing powder factory.
Or Fukushima gums.
ME: I only ate half you can lay the rest over there.
No, thanks.
I am now gonna flush my mouth wait.
Ok, i will have another grab into the bag.
And we now don't have much left.
But i want to try this funny stuff now.
J: I think it's the same to that rice stuff.
I got that the last day. We had so much stuff laying around
and that's all stuff i then took.
ME: Ok. It looks normal like a cookie again.
But i bet because it's from Japan it's no ordinary cookie,
J: That's true.
It only seems like one.
ME: It smells normal.
Oh it has a crown on it.
AAAAaaand the backside is mushed.
It had a star on it.
Looks like that.
J: It sounds crispy.
ME: Yes, and you can't cut it in the middle.
J: Dude! How hard is that stuff?
Oh yes... no ...yess mhhh , nooo
The memories...
JJ: I want a small piece.
ME: I try to cut it. It is really difficult to do.
J: As my father was in Japan for the first time
he also brought me that
and it tasted really strange.
ME: That's how it looks from inside.
Is there orange inside?
J: I don't know it looks like jelly.
JJ: Here you get the biggest one.
JJ: Good?
ME: No no no
J: I hate the consistency of it.
JJ: Why am I the last one to try this.
ME: Nope!
No, not my favourite
On the outside it's like...
Ciao
It's like wafer on the outside
and that tastes ok
but the stuff inside is really really nasty.
You could get used to the consistency of it.
When you eat it more often.
But on the first try... Nope
Nope, absolutley no
JJ: I don't want to anymore.
J: Drink something.
ME: I dont't know what it is supposed to taste like
is it apricot?
What do you guys have tasted?
Spoiler! Spoiler! It is not wasching powder this time.
J: It simply tastes scruffy.
J: No, not really scruffy but...
Me: I think it tastes a little like...
Like when you let jelly dry out.
That's a little how it tastes.
J: I don't know ...i can't ...don't know how it tastes.
It will be apricot but doesn't really taste like it.
-------------------------------------------
1) Nos prières entendues - Duration: 17:08.
For more infomation >> 1) Nos prières entendues - Duration: 17:08. -------------------------------------------
Ghost in the Shell For more infomation >> Ghost in the Shell-------------------------------------------
Candy Nail Painting Game - Tabtale Nail Art for Girls - Duration: 16:20.
Candy nail painting game
Tabtale nail art
Candy nail painting game
Tabtale nail art
Candy nail painting game
Tabtale nail art
Candy nail painting game
Tabtale nail art
Candy nail painting game
No comments:
Post a Comment