An Giang info: Youtube daily report Jul 31 2017

Hello, I am Busy P from Ed Banger Records from Paris.

Hi we are Justice. I am Gaspard.

Xavier.

And we are here in Los Angeles at Amoeba for What's in My Bag.

both in ESG record where yes this is one of the been like every time I shall

record I buy it I have a soft spot for bands that are so many more because

there's nothing the edges like difficulty base and random secretions

and in the record but somehow they manage to never make it boring and to

make it sound like as a lot of people and a lot of thing going on and they

have such as shit like groove that it's impossible to mimic shown not part of

the family nor slightly of Beatrice is very then we together at the same time

and floating this is a record from chou-heung seventies like experiment : a

psychedelic composer from Italian it feels like I problems I really don't

know what to expect we're very movie Anna and information

everybody you know is recommended this album but I'm not familiar that much

with bad brain

it's a recommendation from my bad but also from one side of the Beastie Boys

which is my favorite benevelon it's from the Adam Yauch who is in the

best bank Alka album of all time I would do a Thundercat new album there's one

poem that I heard like in London in the curfew like maybe four months ago

I hope it's on this album I would be beautiful on this one but I loved it and

when I asked for it was someone who knew was a knockout for reckon it's on the

new record and crossing fingers and even the birches so beautifully impossible

not to want to own it like we know it could be like the nice Biddy regatta

Rado no one like so classic the dis musik yacht and this guy called Roger

Roger drink some music to attract any music now about well it's a famous

record sonic never music knob I don't know that much garlic 39:30 can we talk

about the fact that the guy looks exactly like a thousand little X

antennas would lead users and I'll Cuba the Fraggle watch what 24 songs by the

Fraggle works for a good 20 20 by the Beach Boys one of my favorite down level

and as one of my favorite Beach Boys songs from this one that is a be with me

at a very darker these were tracking really happy to have you and it's new

and I actually like reissues we have so many record at home and so so many of

them are like sauce pressing lore and and you can almost not listen to them

because that background too much noise and much practically always happy to see

family issues I found this boot on the images of Kim

flooded and be made by Tom torjussen the head of each movie studio they judge did

the best record covers ever everybody knows this record Corbett to us like it

was a huge inspiration on on having just one image without the name of the band

that in typography is just something very pure and at the time we already

have been using the cross back for three years but we didn't necessarily want to

use it more and we were looking at this code of like how great it would be to

have the strong symbol on the record or like and only weeks later we thought of

course across we should use it I know that they're going to be jealous of

something I found and I think it's the side of the memorabilia we say I love

this one memorabilia and amazing country think and just enter chief water the

agencies are amazing $4.99 but I took it I bought another record just for me and

Canada people same thing for me at free Friday

50 years you cannot understand and the spirit of stuff that has too much for me

and this is that the butyl bomb and look beautiful but I have no idea from this

one of the site is just one phone so it might be like a simple essential but at

least like even if the worker is changing the record tip is inviting it's

a good balance I found those ones and they are made by this guy called the

Duke Johnson and you'd like like a cover for Judas Priest like it really colorful

kind of airbrushing painting stuff I just loved intent on both all I could

find and I found this did reality TV I just love those kind of geometric shape

for those who don't know both gasping xavie before making music our graphic

designer now both graphic designer and they both both like music so the

vibe in here my last choice will be of course I'm a kid from the 90s you know

like you can see all undress and with this immaculate service Lisa no

yeah look at this and also the casting a beavis and butt-head do America white

Gumby red Chili Peppers LL Cool J rancid ACDC as a case you can't go wrong when

you hang out with the December's header

yo bit might be reason booted they are what others will be my last choice

Elton John nerd I really have the ameba mug at my place so like I take my

morning key in a nanny barber amongst others because I just like just like mad

yeah just like not the heart just like a lot of Mugler from different periods and

a broody mug Wow okay alright I found we Trudeau to expect from this if the music

from the do game I actually never played with

sometimes like there's some really interesting stuff in college building

music because you really have to go to the point in terms of melody and

emotions you can provide very many more like knowing what type of emotions will

come out oh yeah there's a good one thank you very much Kyle thank you thank

you for inviting us yeah it's so much fun just to hang in the shop like we

would do it like anyway so you're welcome back anytime you need a couple

you know looking at it

aha

For more infomation >> Justice and Busy P - What's in My Bag? - Duration: 8:33.

-------------------------------------------

Bollywood Marriages - 11 Bollywood Stars Who Married 3 to 4 Times | Still Single? | - Duration: 5:28.

Please Check Video Description For Details/Updates

For more infomation >> Bollywood Marriages - 11 Bollywood Stars Who Married 3 to 4 Times | Still Single? | - Duration: 5:28.

-------------------------------------------

Audi A1 Sportback 1.2 TFSI S-LINE ADMIRED - Duration: 1:01.

For more infomation >> Audi A1 Sportback 1.2 TFSI S-LINE ADMIRED - Duration: 1:01.

-------------------------------------------

ASMR 💤 RILASSATI MENTRE TI TRUCCO ! Makeup Roleplay, Personal Attention - Duration: 27:38.

For more infomation >> ASMR 💤 RILASSATI MENTRE TI TRUCCO ! Makeup Roleplay, Personal Attention - Duration: 27:38.

-------------------------------------------

Zaz - Si - Kdyby - Frankfurt 15. 12. 2016 - czech subtitules - Duration: 2:42.

For more infomation >> Zaz - Si - Kdyby - Frankfurt 15. 12. 2016 - czech subtitules - Duration: 2:42.

-------------------------------------------

Tesla model 3 supply chain rookie mistakes slowing sales? Just in time at scale harder. - Duration: 12:09.

greetings this is greg for tesla fan insight if you all know we tend to cover

the story of Tesla from a different angle than most companies today's focus

is a question which is is Elon Musk's showing that he's a scale supply chain

rookie bonjour begins to station okay all five items to the Greg for Tesla fan

insight after watching the Elan musk

presentation on the model three on the 28th I was fascinated kind of reviewing

the elements of what he brought forward and one of those items that was sort of

playing in my mind is I read a story by one of the Mercedes executives where

they reviewed the advantages and disadvantages of Mercedes versus Tesla

and one of the things they talked about was the fact that Tesla has a

disadvantage when it comes to scale manufacturing of cars which is an

advantage that Mercedes has over Tesla and so I was sort of thinking about this

after watching the display of Aylan musk and company and I was fascinated by one

of the things that popped to mind that was mind-blowing and that is the fact

that he showed some things that show that he / and his staff may be supply

chain rookies when it comes to little things that you do to better manage your

supply chain and a great example is illustrated by Dell corporation which is

the photo that I chose to show you so one of the things that Dell developed as

a technique was that Dell in Rapids called Round Rock Texas requires their

major suppliers to install a building right next door to their manufacturing

plant and what happens there is that if you call

sell and order something Dell will engage in activity where they will order

the part to complete your order from next door and it will literally come

through the wall after you've placed that order so the process is that they

will put together box your order and ship it to you and you will have paid

for that order and they still have terms on the on the items that have been used

so for example Intel Corporation is one of their largest suppliers they will

take delivery of an Intel chip to go on your computer immediately they will bill

and get the money from you immediately but they're getting 30 to 90 day terms

from Intel so basically by having supply chain stuff the way they are they know

and control the inventory that's next door in the Intel building but they only

take delivery to their facilities once the order has been taken and paid for

allowing Enfield to help finance their business in the process plus by knowing

the inventory that's next door they can also control if and when anything might

be late they already know ahead of time what that might be so I mentioned this

because if you review the video of a LAN muskan company you'll notice that they

engage in a behavior where he showed a screen were a 54% of his items are US

base that he's ordering from suppliers and the remainder is a global global

supply chain I I was really fascinated by this because it kind of explained why

he said they were entering manufacturing hell but part of entering manufacturing

hell is your inexperience and your plan is shaky so all the fire put outs that

you're doing a reflection of sort of being a rookie and having not

done things at scale prior so another item I wanted to suggest here and

there's a problem with what I just described as too wise lol on is not

doing this is that they have a second problem which is if you notice the

gigafactory and the main plant where the model 3 is

being produced they're about 130 miles apart across a

mountain range hopefully snowstorms don't affect this

but I have actually gotten stuck in the Reno area for a whole week doing an

unexpected major storm so their supply chain can be jeopardized even between

Tesla properties by snow or heavy weather in those mountains where those

roads actually do get shut down on occasion so I wanted to bring this up

because I was thinking to myself shoot if Ellen must gave me 72 hours I could

have a temporary facility up right next to the gigafactory

and give me a week and I could have one to at least two completed model threes

out of that plant starting one week from when we started setting up if I have

access to the global supply chain to order my parts and then from there for

that temporary facility you know after a couple of weeks I could easily add one

or two hundred units per week to whatever the production schedule is

going to be at the main plant so if you look at the aerial on the facility that

they operate in currently they have a real supply chain issue there because

there's no space to store large amounts of products heading into the vehicles

they're being produced so they're going to end up just as large numbers of

tractor trailers lined up trying to bring in and take in raw materials or

parts and take away finished goods and so I also wonder if it's wise even

consider trying to manufacture the three in their current location because

it's one of the most expensive locations for manufacturing space in the world and

you know they have a decent size facility but for the number of vehicles

they're going to be pushing through there that facility is really too small

so hence you end up having to do a juggling trick to get inventory through

there quickly I actually thought that when it was announced they're going to

go to five hundred thousand units a year it would work out fine because Tesla has

been manufacturing somewhat at scale but there's a big difference between running

a line at twenty five thousand cars or SUVs a quarter and running five thousand

vehicles a week so that that regular quarterly production run has now become

a weekly production run so in theory those lessons would be transferable but

given the space constraints they have I could see why currently he talked about

this being manufacturing hell and I would not be surprised to see if things

like weather or as he described he's not getting his materials from next door

so Ellen showed off his supply chain and it's quite clear that he's not getting

his materials from approximate location so this creates further problems which

is you know what if there are weather issues or other things associated with

the supply chain outside of the United States and therefore introducing issues

as well which is another reason why having that requiring your supplier base

to have warehouses within 10 miles of your current location with inventory

that can be looked in on by the computers within Tesla is a way smarter

move than what he's trying to pull off currently so I'm anticipating they're

going to have all kinds of cost overruns related to having to throw parts that

could have arrived by barge or and by ship by airplane or other more costly

methods to feed that supply chain given that there are unexpected hiccups in the

normal sort of delivery process pickups for places or supply chain like this can

include what if there's a strike on the docks in Oakland California or the docks

in Los Angeles or the docks from which from Germany or other places from which

the stuff is being shipped so you take all those what-ifs out by telling your

supplies you're either going to be next door or within five miles or we don't

buy from you one of the supply chain rookie moves that I was exposed to that

I was a little bit surprised by is that I went to the Tesla store in Washington

DC and in the January time frame this year I got a chance to look at what was

available there and one of the things I noted about the tires is that they're

running Michelin's on most of the vehicles on the floor and in my last

visit in late May early June there was one vehicle that was running Goodyear it

was a high performance as Class s vehicle the other vehicles were running

Continental tires so I thought this was fascinating because what this put in my

mind is well is that if you're stocking tires to be

put on the vehicles by sticking with one brand or manufacturer that simplifies

your supply chain further so that it's easier to meet demand because you're

putting the same tires on all the cars it's not going to be the same you know

the customers will have order different items based on performance or not but

but staying with one manufacturer makes a supply chain again a little bit easier

rather than trying to blend mate suppliers on any part and tires kind of

take up a decent amount of space so I think that you know that would be a

smart move as well so I hope you guys found this interesting again I believe

that Tesla has shown itself to be a little bit of a rookie when it comes to

supply chain management related to manufacturing and I think that we

introduce whether when you introduce strikes when you introduce unexpected to

it by not having your suppliers required to be proximate to where your

manufacturing you're begging for punishment and by the way I didn't even

introduce the fact that there's worst traffic in the world but you know the

census of the area I'm particularly where they're located has some of the

ugliest rush-hour traffic anywhere in the United States so that's even another

variable that could affect the movement of those parts thank you again for

taking time out to spend time with us this is Greg for Tesla fan insight

chuseok scooter watch Italy LIHEAP Rojo o da - Salam alaikum look forward to our

next opportunity to chat have a great day thanks bye and please like and

subscribe for more insightful introductions to Tesla

For more infomation >> Tesla model 3 supply chain rookie mistakes slowing sales? Just in time at scale harder. - Duration: 12:09.

-------------------------------------------

40 ROLLERSKATING TRICKS WITH THE NEW CHAYA KARMA ROLLER SKATES // VLOG 131 - Duration: 4:46.

ten minutes rollerskate as many stalls as I can

Olá Youtube My name is Ricardo Lino and I'm a wheel addict

this weekend was Rollercon in Vegas where was I in

South Africa yes I didn't make it and I also didn't make as many videos as I

usually do I didn't upload as many videos as I would love to for the last

five days my baby my daughter was in the hospital with a bacterial family reasons

I couldn't really skate I really tried to skate, I tried to make a video on Saturday

Olá youttube my name is ricardo Lino and I'm a wheel addict

Its Saturday Morning, i just left the

hospital I tried to make a video on Sunday

Olá Youtube my name is Ricardo lino and a wheel addict I'm currently leaving the

hospital and I couldn't do it I just didn't have the time to but today is

Monday and I went to fix my back which has been giving me a lot of problems

today I think I really fixed it I went and I met MOC this Japanese guy Oh

thank you so much

I don't even know what it does basically what he told me is e

is to fight and it just told me well I know how to hurt someone but I also need

to know how to fix them he got me right there basically it's the

second time I go to that guy and he does this type of manipulation whatever the

last time I when they made all the alignment and today he was working on me

completely different the truth is my back pain is gone

so I was able to skate and while I was skating what I tried to do was in ten

minutes I wanted to do as many stalls as I could in the mini ramp

okay so ten

minutes roller skate as many stalls as I can start now

we got like 8 minutes and 30 to go

still going still going six minutes and 20 I got some boot tricks , check this

four minutes and 27

I just realize that the sound from the last clip is PUCKED with an "F"

so sorry about the sound I'm also sorry about the helmet I forgot it

helmet was here the whole time the helmet was here though I forgot it sorry

probably I could have done more stalls if I wasn't stopped for a few days maybe

I was just getting back into it after not getting maybe for like five six days

anyway I hope you enjoy the tricks that I did with the roller skate the roller

skate that I was using are the Chaya Karma's and the child Karma's were

presented these weekend at the roller con I think they are available now

or it will be really really soon so if you like what I did and if you like this

skates that I used look for those Chaya Karma's that's it I hope you

enjoyed this video if you did don't forget to subscribe to the channel if

you didn't like it well just drop me a comment tell me what I didn't like about

it maybe I can change it next time thank you so much and see you guys soon Cheers

For more infomation >> 40 ROLLERSKATING TRICKS WITH THE NEW CHAYA KARMA ROLLER SKATES // VLOG 131 - Duration: 4:46.

-------------------------------------------

How to Live: Think about Death - Duration: 2:50.

Hooo-ahh.

Our days are numbered.

We just don't know the number.

Pbtbtbtbt (like a horse)

For more infomation >> How to Live: Think about Death - Duration: 2:50.

-------------------------------------------

Un banc pour deux (2017) - Duration: 10:51.

Hello, can you hear me.áThis is Fabian.

Sorry, I know it is a bit late.

I just wanted to let you know that I cannot come this weekend.

I have a lot of work.

The good news is that I have found someone to cover for me.

He's probably not as good as me, but better that nothing.

That works, we can do it again when you want.

Bye.

Are you ok? Yes, I know, I just finished. I'm going home.

It's ok, don't worry.

Kiss.

Life is exhausting, isn't it?

Excuse me?

This damn life, it's unbelievable, how exhausting it is!

It's true that it's not always easy.

It's always the bad choices that eats up our youth.

I am Richard.

You can't make that up.

There's a lot of shit going on but I can't complain. I'm screwed up but I'm not complaining.

It's Fabian, that didn't mean much.

And telláme, if it was possible to re do, what would you do?

What do you mean?

Listen, this will sound absurd...

I need to tell my situation to someone. Can I talk to you for a while?

I'm not sure where to start.

I'm approaching my 40's and I realised that with timeáI have lost all my passions.

I studied commerce in need as every one else after turning around.

At that time I didn't ask many questions about my future.

I wanted stability.

I secured jobs better paid each time and six years ago I found my girlfriend.

And then routine kicks off?

Worse.

I never really loved her.

I lied to myself all these years. I'm not sure how I did it.

Now that I am nearly 40, I realised that I have made decisions in life.

True decisions and I was happy to follow through.

Up until today.

Why today?

Because she would like to have a baby.

This is what happens.

I can tell you that it made me click.

For the first time in my life I realised that I had to make a choice

that takes me to two very different paths.

I'm sure it's not too late.

I can break with everything and start from scratch.

What would you do in my place?

I would tell her thing as they are... my dear, this life is not for me.

It has been a very long time that life doesn't make me happy.

That how it is, that's it... next.

But, I'm sure you won't do it.

Why?

You don't have the courage.

Otherwise you would have barred long before.

You're wrong.

You will be surprised.

Because you would have the courage?

Absolutely, without any hesitation.

It's a lot easier to make decisions

when we haven't built anything and have nothing to lose.

Fuck off... you asked me a question. I reply.

My opinion has no relevance but...

I just had a vision that can help you.

A vision?

Yes, a situation that will occur tomorrow.

Nothing to do with how chicken you are, don't worry.

Are you clairvoyant or what?

That will be your new beginning.

I have flashes sometimes.

It has been a long time last time it happened.

Perhaps the whisky?

Don't believe me if you don't want to, I don't care.

Sorry, that's not what I meant.

What type of situation?

That doesn't miss.

It's positive.

Even better, that will change me.

While I wait, I'm going to break up with my girlfriend.

I don't need a vision to know you won't be able to do so.

If you are here tomorrow morning, I will pass by and will confirm.

Understood.

Good evening.

Are you waiting for someone?

No-one.

Apologies I didn't knock.

Never mind.

At this moment I'm lost in thoughts.

I said that because yesterday I met a vagabond here at this bench...

And he was right, in fact, he was right twice.

He hasn't only told me that I wouldn't have the courage to break us with my girlfriend.

But on top an opportunity has just materialised this morning, as he had predicted.

It's in fact funny...

I have an old friend that I have met this morning.

He's adventurous.

He's looking for someone like me to start up his company in Miami.

It's a well paid job.

With the beach nearby, this without mentioning other advantages.

So, she comes with you?

Whom?

Your girlfriend.

No, I finally broke up with her this morning.

I'm sure it's a lot easier when...

there are not more risks.

Yes.

It's life you have always dreamt of.

Not really.

It's just that I see this opportunity as a way to escape.

And you?

It doesn't seem that things are going that well?

Yes, all fine.

My life has also changed a lot lately.

Can I sit next to you?

It will be easier to talk.

I'm not a multi-recidivist rapist.

I fly tomorrow.

How come?

Sorry, I meant where?

I'm going to travel to change my ideas.

When I come back I will settle in the province.

I need a healthier lifestyle.

A life that is better for me.

What do you do?

A job that renders me sad.

Ok.

I hope you find your equilibrium.

Thanks.

And all of a suden you...

I'm going there.

I understand.

Good luck on your new beginning.

Thanks, same to you.

Good evening.

Wait...

What's your name?

Thea.

Hey, you're there.

You are a genious.

You had just seen things as they were.

I have a friend whom just called this morning to propose a job.

That has given me the courage to do what I wanted.

I broke up with my girlfriend, I quit everything.

Was that your vision?

I must have drunk a lot yesterday.

That has nothing to do.

What you mean nothing to do?

It doesn't matter.

What, tell me then.

I don't see that clearly anymore.

What was your vision?

I saw a beauty with green eyes.

Translated by Lina Arbelaez

For more infomation >> Un banc pour deux (2017) - Duration: 10:51.

-------------------------------------------

Gainesville Gameday - 11/12/2016 - D BLOCK - Duration: 6:05.

For more infomation >> Gainesville Gameday - 11/12/2016 - D BLOCK - Duration: 6:05.

-------------------------------------------

Toyota Avensis Verso 2.0 D4-D L.Sol 6p. - Duration: 0:54.

For more infomation >> Toyota Avensis Verso 2.0 D4-D L.Sol 6p. - Duration: 0:54.

-------------------------------------------

Game of Thrones | Legendary - Duration: 1:20.

All dwarfs are bastards in their father's eyes.

He would see this country burn if he could be King of the ashes.

I am not here to be Queen of the ashes

Leave one wolf alive,

It's not you.

and the sheep are never safe.

The lords of westeros are sheep.

Are you a sheep?

No.

You're a dragon.

Be a dragon.

For more infomation >> Game of Thrones | Legendary - Duration: 1:20.

-------------------------------------------

Economic Update: Economics of Socialism - Duration: 58:01.

Welcome friends to another edition of Economic Update a weekly program devoted

to the economic dimensions of our lives our jobs our incomes our debts and those

facing our kids as well I'm your host Richard Wolff I've been a

Professor of Economics all my adult life and I currently teach at the new school

University in New York City. Before jumping into the large number of

economic updates I have arranged for you today I wanted to make a couple of our

usual announcements for those of you who might want to watch this program either

for a second time or if you have the opportunity otherwise on television as a

television program we are very pleased to make that available to you please go

to Patreon P A T R E O N Patreon.com indicate you want

Economic Update the program and you'll be able to see it on TV that's once

again Patreon.com/economicupdate I also want to remind those of you that

might be interested in having me come and speak in your University in your

Union in your community center your library and so on

that I am now represented by a speaker bureau good friends and good people who

go by the name speak out now that's all one word speak out now dot o-r-g org if

you want to email them you can do that at info at Speakoutnow.org and I

want to remind you that we maintain two websites that are available to you at no

charge 24/7 one of them is democracy at work or one word democracy at work dot

info and the other one is our D Wolff with two F's com. Okay so with that

behind us let's get into the updates one of the big items this last week was the

passage in Congress of a bill apply sanctions to Russia we have

applied sanctions to Russia for a while now this is another bill that applies

another bunch of them for another period of time there's two comments I have to

make about the economics of sanctions the first is that they don't work in

other words we have much experience with sanctions let me give you the grossest

one shortly following the arrival of Fidel Castro to power in Cuba back in

1959 the United States sponsored a failed invasion to overthrow in when

that didn't work the United States applied sanctions and for the next

half-century actually a bit more than that those sanctions were always

justified on the grounds that they would bring Cuba around would end mr. Castro's

regime and so on did none of those things

the Cubans found ways to get around the sanctions as the Russians have and as

the Russians will one of the consequences of leaving most industrial

production in the hands of private enterprises is that it has become very

easy for governments suffering sanctions to find more than a few companies are

willing to make a little extra profit by wiggling around the sanctions and so

they don't work they are mostly a political theater designed to persuade

whoever they want to that they're being tough and going after the bad guy but in

terms of what they really do it's fake and so let me give you a concrete

example it turns out that also this last week the United States Treasury

Department that's mr. Trump's Treasury Department levied a two million dollar

fine on a company for violating the sanctions against Russia the company in

question was Exxon Mobil that's right the biggest oil company in the world a

two million dollar fine for violating sanctions let me remind

what the annual revenue is of ExxonMobil in 2016

216 billion that's with a B and they got a fine of 2 million that's as if you did

something really bad and the government finds you and came to you and said right

in your face you must pay this fine 3 cents right now or we will be mighty

angry and you would fish into your pocket giggling at every point and give

them the three pennies that's what 2 million is to the Exxon

Mobil Corporation but the story gets better who was the head CEO of Exxon

during the time that it violated this sanctions put by the US government

against Russia well a mr. Rex Tillerson you know him he was made by mr. Trump to

be the current Secretary of State so let me be sure you all get it we have a

Secretary of State who as far as we can tell is in no danger of losing his

position who was the CEO at the time that the government mr. Tillison now

serves finds his company for violating the law it takes your breath away

doesn't it who's above the law not just mr. Trump in his own mind all of these

folks aren't they and meanwhile they play the theater of sanctions the next

update has to do with medical news oh no not again the insurance bill fights in

the Congress that use up our headlines I want to talk about other things that are

falling kind of below the radar and in this program we like to bring them right

up above the radar I'm right within its purview there's a long-standing question

about whether health care doctors hospitals medical device and drug makers

and the insurance companies whether they should be private or public

in most of the advanced countries of the world they are either public or they are

public-private partnerships we we in America tilt the bill all the way over

to the private or nearly so of course in a rational society this question of

whether anything whether it's medical cares or public parks or the police or

you name it should be handled by private enterprises or by the government or to

be discussed and decided democratically in terms of the populations belief of

which is the better way to get the service provided but we have in America

big private enterprises with lots of money among the biggest and with the

most other Koch brothers and they spend an awful lot of money trying to get rid

of any risk of competition from government enterprises they want to have

it all for themselves as private enterprises and so I want to talk a

little bit about some examples we're leaving things to the private

enterprise is so inefficient so ineffective so immoral that I don't

think it would last five minutes in an open public democratic discussion and

decision as to whether this should be done privately or publicly here's an

example the McKesson Corporation you may not know about it but it's the largest

distributor of drugs in the United States the CEO of that company John

Hamre gren has been in the news this last week why one of the things McKesson

distributes our opioid drugs painkillers that are now causing unbelievable death

and destruction across the United States keep in mind the following statistic 90

Americans die every day from opioid overdoses 90 every day well the McKesson

Corporation distributes those to and it is required by law to report any

suspicious provisions any suspicious number of such drugs being dispensed by

a doctor or a pharmacy to whom they distribute drugs they didn't do a real

good job of that back in 2008 they were fined 13 million dollars for not doing

that properly they promised to do better then they were found guilty again

between 2008 and 2013 and so this last January they were required to pay

another fine a hundred and fifty million dollars on Jan you in January of 2017

they clearly didn't get the message and we suffer the results by the way mr.

hammer Glen the CEO over the last 10 years has taken home somewhere between

five and six hundred million dollars as one clever reporter mentioned mr. hammer

Glen could have paid out of his own pocket

the fines levied against the company and it wouldn't have made a difference to

his lifestyle one little bit leaving the distribution of drugs in private hands

under us revelation of this sort that I've just provided seems to me beyond

inappropriate and becoming downright immoral this is not a good thing to

leave to private enterprise because the profits from distributing opioids

clearly dominated other considerations for mr. hammer gren and his company

another example also in the week this last week by the way if you want more

details on the McKesson Corporation go to the New York Times of July 23 if you

want this next example more details the towel gene corporation CA LG en e it's

the New York Times of July 26th they were subjected to a big fine 280

million dollars for promoting drugs as cancer cures that were not approved by

the FBI for such things in other words to make a lot of more

money by having a lot more people particularly desperate people who are

suffering from cancer put their hopes and more importantly their cash to work

or that of their insurers on these unproven unapproved drugs they got into

trouble they made billions and they paid a 280 million dollar five leading drug

production and distribution in the hands of privates doesn't look real good does

it third example comes from England the Bhoots

corporation it's the largest public pharmacy it distributes beauty and

health aids all over Europe has about excuse me all over Britain and Ireland

has over 2,500 stores there it is by the way a subsidiary of Walgreens

corporation which is an American company doing pretty much the same thing well it

has been charging over $40.00 for the treatment of what is called the

morning-after pill if you have unwanted or unprotected sex and you want to

prevent conception you can take this pill doing it a few days immediately

afterwards and it prevents conception they make this pill available in their

upscale pharmacies at over $40 treatment whereas other companies in England that

do the same thing but smaller chains typically charge less than half and so

women in Britain have begun to complain loudly and the British government gets

these complaints that people who desperately need this pill are having to

pay extortionate amounts of money in one of their pharmacy chains and they want

the government to look into that that sort of thing works in England for those

of you who may not aware of it being here in the United

States where we don't have this thing boots tried to hold on they did a clever

thing they got or maybe they were just lucky to get a conservative women's

group to say that nothing should be done because sometimes can you imagine this

pill is provided to women who have not gotten parental consent or are under age

what that has to do with the price you charge I will leave to your imagination

I can't quite see it other than as a way for boots to find some justification for

the absurdly high price they charge but it failed in England partly because of

the power of women's groups and the fact that the Labour Party joined in Boots

has now apologized for the overcharge and we'll see kind of what happens but

again it raises the question if there are laws in England which there are in

the UK about what drugs can and cannot be provided to whom and by the way they

the pharmacist has to ask certain questions of anybody who buys

contraception in England that's part of the law but if the law provides that

boots must do this then it is not appropriate for boots to make some

policy decision which just happens to boost its profits to go the other way

last point the National Health Service in Great Britain distributes the exact

same drugs for free all over England the women who go to these stores either have

not got the time or the access to a clinic and so they're being gouged by

the private distributor you wanted a better example of how the public does a

better job than the private clearly the public distributed for free because they

don't have to pay very much since they buy the drugs in bulk and therefore get

the best price next update Consumer Reports magazine very useful

service telling consumers what to watch out for it has an interesting story in

the August 2 thousand 17 issue it turns out that the

big cable providers cable TV in the United States and specifically the

article mentions Comcast and spectrum which are two of the biggest get among

the lowest scores of anybody who scores for Consumer Reports that is they get

more complaints about bad service than anybody else or almost anybody else

really low scores and Consumer Reports speculates in their article what the

reason is three-quarters of Americans it turns out have access to only one

broadband provider who can provide speeds in excess of 25 Mbps in other

words the reason that they get so many complaints is that their service is

lousy and their rates are too high and that's because they have an effective

monopoly on speedy service in three-quarters of America but this has

led to an interesting and creative response it talks just to the public

private issue it turns out that some municipalities not happy with their

citizens being subjected to this monopoly ripoff have gone into providing

this service themselves the Consumer Reports magazine credits citynet in

Santa Monica California and EPB - Chattanooga in that part of Tennessee

and it turns out upon research that 500 municipalities across America either

provide this service themselves or do so in partnership with private companies

but of course the private companies are busy they have filed all kinds of

lawsuits to prevent towns from offering any competition in the way of public

provision of these services and they have also used their lobbying efforts to

get almost 25 states across America to throw obstacles in the way of

communities cities and towns within those states from doing what Chattanooga

and Santa Monica have done to undo the monopoly next time you hear

the senators from various states and they're doing it more and more talk

about being opposed to monopolies check out whether they did anything against

the monopoly of your cable provider next short item I just wanted you to know

that the latest study of what CEOs of big corporations earn indicate that on

average they earn 271 times what the average workers in their companies earn

that's up from 30 or 40 times 50 years ago 271 times it takes your breath away

it has increased over recent decades far more than what has been done for average

workers pay that is CEOs pay is risen much faster than average workers and you

might be interested to know that CEOs pay has written risen much faster than

the profits of the companies that they lead they don't pay their workers and

they take more from themselves as increases than their companies earn nice

job if you can get it and here are the two top winners this last year mark lor

lor e he works at walmart his pay last year 244 million dollars and I did the

math for you it works out to five million dollars a week 52 weeks a year

or as many weeks as he actually shows up so you consider your pay each week and

then you think about mock lore at Walmart he's number one number two

sundar pichai I hope I'm pronouncing his name right but I don't really care

he works at Google or what it's now called alphabet and he made 200 million

a year and that works out to roughly four million dollars per week there's no

further comment I need make you can make your own okay we turn now to a final

story which is connected to last week's in

view of John Summa a professor at the University of Vermont who is being

kicked out because he questions the mainstream orthodoxy from a left

perspective this story has to do with economics as it's taught at the

University of Utah that's right Utah it turns out that some years ago

can you imagine Utah University hired in its Economics Department a long star

alongside a whole big bunch of professors who teach conventional

mainstream economics a few who teach it from my mock seein or a critical or a

heterogeneous it's these different words I use this day in anyway from a

dissenting perspective it hired a few and they have been there for quite a

while and a few others have been hired alongside all the conventional material

that is also taught but my Ike was drawn to an editorial in the Deseret News a

leading newspaper in Utah which admitted the editorial did that Utah University

is one of the few universities in America that allows any dissenting

Marxist perspectives to be taught but even though they are very few Deseret

editorial deseret news as editorial applauded the formation of a new

Institute the Echo's Institute at the University of Utah with money from the

Echolls family and hence the name and then I really found it interesting

ten million dollars from the Koch brothers foundation to establish a

special Institute whose job apparently is to counteract to offset to balance

whatever word you like the awful influence of a few dissenting Marxist

scholars all with the requisite credential

teaching in the Utah University economics department in most other

countries the idea is if you teach economics it is useful to open to

students the array of differing perspectives those that celebrate

capitalism and those that are skeptical or critical those that use mainstream

traditions but also those that explore leaving non mainstream traditions partly

this is to give students a sense of the diversity that has always been part of

economics partly it's to sharpen their mental ability to look at economic

issues using multiple toolboxes not just one etc all the logical pedagogical

arguments those are discarded here in the United States in the vast majority

of universities who exclude especially in economics with which I am familiar

they exclude dissenters in a way that is somewhere between absurd and silly it is

so lopsided and one-sided that it produces in the United States a

population that is barely literate in mainstream economics and has no exposure

to dissenting perspectives it is a rigidly enforced orthodoxy there

are a few schools and our exceptions famous ones the University of

Massachusetts the University American University in Washington and others and

Utah was among them and that seems to have been too much for the Koch brothers

and other conservatives who have now funded a school alongside the Economics

Department to monitor them to counter them to undo them this is hysteria

masking itself as a reasonable behavior but of course with a private enterprise

system that allows billions of dollar to be accumulated in the hands of a few

individuals they can be as lopsided and one-sided as parochial and narrow-minded

as they wish and make what kinds of things happen just like that because

they have the money it's another price you pay you might

think you live in a democratic society where we democratically decide how we

want our children to be educated we make at least a little effort in that

direction in our public primary and secondary schools which are after all

subject to democratic pressures in the cities and towns where they're located

but when it comes to higher education it is kind of an open season because we do

not fund our colleges and public colleges and universities adequately

they're desperate for funds they turn to the private sector and for those of you

who believe that private companies and private individuals give money to

universities without wanting something in return

without exerting pressure on those universities to do what they want well

you are indulging a level of naive naivete that defies anything I can say

you really need to rethink your position the people donating the money have no

ambiguity whatsoever in making sure they get a return on what they donate and the

Koch brothers and the other conservatives that funded the new

Institute at Utah which you can read about in the Deseret News whenever you

want to in Utah is a perfect example well we've come to the end of the first

half of this program please remember the websites are DeWulf

with - let's calm and democracy at work dot info they will provide you with all

sorts of supplementary materials we will take a short back

short break scuze me and we will be right back please stay with us

we get rather okay

Hey

right here there

so same time next week well of course put away a few bucks feel

like a million bucks for free tips to help you save go to feed the food all

right you know this isn't any fun to talk about but we should okay

so who's gonna do what I'll pack the dead batteries great I'll only put what

I don't mean into a duffle bag perfect that's totally unhelpful no problem

meanwhile I will try to comfort everyone by speaking in a calm voice and I'll try

to get the generator going without any gas oh let's not forget the cell phones

which probably won't work right and who is going to handle supplies I can forget

to do all this for us thanks pal well I think we couldn't be any less prepared

I'm pranking guys talk to your kids about who to call where to meet what to

pack visit ready.gov slash kids for tips and information

Oh checking your fantasies no just my 401k statement hmm all right suppose you

find the money for that I just been saving a little every month I can't seem

to save anything well what about all this what about the money you're

spending what money it's gone before and get my

hands on it I got a pizza for it Todd hey can somebody spot me when it comes

to financial stability don't get left behind

it's 547 get tools and tips for saving at feed the pig org when some people

struggle with their mortgage payments they become frozen

but the people who take action are far more likely to get the most positive

outcome call this free government program for the option that's right for

you welcome back friends to the second half of this economic update program

today the second half is going to be devoted to one huge topic the topic is

socialism it is something that needs the conversation and it needs discussion and

it needs the date but before I get into it I have to explain why it needs those

things basically I offer two reasons first a whole bevy of recent polls here

in the United States indicates that particularly younger people folks age 35

and younger when asked the question which do you prefer capitalism or

socialism are giving an answer that is surprising many across the United States

namely huge numbers sometimes majorities are saying they prefer socialism when

you explore that further and I have done that personally as well as looked at the

literature it turns out that it's probably fair to say that voting that

way in a poll is a reflection more of people's dissatisfaction with the

capitalism they live in then it is a clear preference for something else

because when you talk with large numbers of young people which I do in my classes

as well as in my public speaking it's quite clear that they're not very clear

about what socialism is what it has been where it comes from where it's going and

so in the interests of responding to the growing interest I want to talk about it

on this program the second reason has to do with the fact that here in the United

States unlike in most other parts of the world for the last 50 years there has

been a deeply repressive taboo on discussing socialism in a reasonable way

what are its strengths what are its weaknesses what are its achievements one

of the things it did that we want to avoid just the kind of reasonable

balanced that you would give to any topic that

seemed to you or me to be important we haven't been able to do that we have

been in a cold war for most of that time our enemy we were told was the Soviet

Union it was socialist and therefore it was socialism and everything having to

do with socialism had to be poo-pooed put down denounced as horrific and evil

and awful as if we were in the middle of a life-threatening conflict and had no

time or interest in a balanced assessment we were fighting for our

lives or at least that's what the thought leaders of this country wanted

us to believe and so we didn't have a conversation they had it everywhere else

pretty much but not here and so we've had a generation of people unexposed to

what socialism is unaware that over the last 50 years like everything else

socialism has changed capitalism certainly has and socialism too but you

wouldn't know much about it if you weren't allowed to read the books to

have the teachers who could teach it to you and to have a national public debate

so in the interests of catching up with 50 lost years let's talk about socialism

and let's do it on this program and hopefully in lots of other venues as

well well the first thing it's a bit strange about the word socialism is why

we use it it has at least for the last century been the major alternative to

capitalism the major critic of capitalism in most countries of the

world there are socialist parties who are important and often are win the

elections and become the government's in those countries it's been true in

virtually every country of Europe for example but many other parts of the

world as well so socialism is a regular normal part of the lives of people in

those countries and there is no evidence to suggest that they're worse off than

we are because they've had such a conversation

and a good bit of evidence to the opposite in any case why socialism while

the word social what we are all part of the society as opposed to a particular

economic system called capitalism why do that why you word it that way I think

the answer lies in understanding a little bit more about capitalism the

very thing socialism is critical of because capitalism hasn't had one

meaning either and capitalism hasn't stayed the same either so let's go

through very briefly how capitalism has been differently understood in the past

and also in the present so for example some people see capitalism as a

particular way of organizing production so that some people will call them

employers that's a relatively small group or in charge they make all the key

decisions of what they're going to produce and how they're going to produce

it it where they're going to produce it and if they make money from doing so if

they produce something that sells well well then they decide what to do with

the profits meanwhile the vast majority of people who work in the enterprises

that employers run are called employees they come to work 9:00 to 5:00

five days a week more or less do what they're told and at the end of the day

go home they leave behind whatever it is they help to produce because that

belongs in a capitalist system to the employer it belongs to the minority even

though it was produced by the majority okay that's the way capitalism works and

that differentiates it from other systems slavery for example is a way of

organizing production but they're the two key players or masters and slaves

and we know enough about that system to know that it's different from capitalism

because in capitalism there are no masters and there are no slaves

that's outlawed by law in most capital countries including our own likewise

capitalism is different in the way it organizes production from feudalism

there we have lords and serfs they are not masters and slaves nobody owns

anybody in feudalism but it's a different system capitalism is employers

and employees and there are other systems for example there have been

economic systems where everybody is self-employed no employer employee

because each of us man and woman adult is working on our own for our selves

that was kind of the vision of America that Thomas Jefferson had in mind in the

early days of the United States it's not what happened but it is what he

preferred and then there are still other systems we can call them communal for

lack of a better term excuse me that's when a tribe or a village or an extended

family organizes production kind of equally everybody having a particular

role to play and a particular voice in making decisions some people call it

collectivist some people call it communal some people call it communist

it's a variety of terms but it's clearly different from the employer-employee

system so that's basically what capitalism has often been defined at but

it's not the only definition if you pick up an American newspaper today you will

actually see capitalism defined very differently it will be defined in terms

of markets and private property or even private enterprises for these people the

definition they want you to focus on is how goods get distributed by markets by

market exchange I get some of that because I give you something equivalent

money or some other object and they want to focus on whether things are owned

privately or publicly I don't want to get into a debate about what the best

definition is I've done that on other times I just want you to have all of

that in your mind why because it helps me to explain the varieties of terms

socialism has taken so for example some socialists just to pick up on what we

just said think of socialism as not markets but

instead government planning and not private enterprise and private property

but instead the public the government owns the means of production so for them

they got a nice dichotomy a nice split capitalism is private enterprise in

markets and socialism is government planning and government owning and

operating enterprises that's neat and that's kind of the way the bait the

debate played out in the twentieth century but the twentieth century is

over we are now almost a fifth into the next century and we need to understand

that the interest and the definitions of capitalism and socialism are shifting

and that's part of what this program is about but let's continue talking about

our topic socialism many socialism's focusing on

what capitalists said they were namely private enterprise and markets have

stressed in their critiques of capitalism that if you leave the economy

to private enterprise and markets you get lots of outcomes that are not good

at least not good for the majority of the people and that what socialism means

here we go is that you bring the government in to correct to offset to

limit the beared outcomes of leaving the economy to private enterprises and

markets that's why governments have been brought in to regulate industries to

limit industries to control industries that are privately owned and operated so

for many people socialism simply means the government is brought in many people

that I encounter in the United States believe that for them socialism is when

the government limits the wage you pay you can't pay below a certain minimum

wage or you can't charge an interest rate above

a certain amount or you have to install mechanisms that clean the air that you

pump into the atmosphere that we all breathe and so on any government coming

in to limit or control private enterprise is seen as socialism then the

extreme form of that is when the government doesn't just regulate or

doesn't just control the government takes over markets are no longer how you

distribute goods the government tells you what to do with the goods after you

produce them who to pass them to and who will pass things to you government

planning not markets and then the government doesn't just regulate private

enterprises it literally takes them over it runs them as government enterprises

and of course the two great examples that people point to other Soviet Union

and China as people who were communists that is their kind of socialism took the

full measure of the government coming in whereas the kinds of social isms you had

still had in France or Germany or Italy or Scandinavia has the government with a

big regulatory role but not literally taking things over the way they did in

Russia and China so socialism has often meant in the minds of socialists that

they're making for a more humane capitalism a gentler capitalism there

was a popular phrase in the twentieth century capitalism with a human face and

the idea of the socialist was what we want is the efficiency they thought

capitalism had the privacy and the private property that they thought

capitalism add but with enough government control to minimize the bad

results that they were convinced did flow and would flow if you let the

economy simply go fully privatized in terms of ownership of property and

market exchange but there were always other socialists who didn't agree

neither with the moderate socialists of West

Europe for example nor with the communists of Russia and China these

were people who felt that socialism wasn't just the government doing things

whether that was more or less wasn't of great interest in it they felt there was

something much more central much more important that they as socialists

focused on and that had to do with how production was organized in other words

for them socialism meant not organizing with employers or employees in their

view that kind of system that kind of capitalism shared awful qualities with

feudalism and slavery and the awful qualities were basically that the

minority at the top masters lords and now employers could and would use their

economic power to control the political and cultural life of the society and be

fundamentally undemocratic in the workplace where the minority controls

master Lord employer and therefore in also in the broader society using their

wealth and power to control the broader society so they can stay in control of

the enterprises that they dominate so for these socialists socialism means an

alternative economic system of production the end of employer versus

employee and the substitution of a democratic socialized ownership and

operation of enterprises that means the workers or the community or an alliance

of workers and residents of a community together democratically own and operate

the production in their society for them that's socialism and therefore there's a

struggle among socialists between those who think this fundamental change of the

organization of production is key and those who think no no let the

capitalists run their enterprises just have the government come in and limit

control what they do to get rid of the bad

results no socialists don't like each other often debate with each other and

that's fine they are a different way of interpreting socialism and there's every

right and reason that they should argue and debate and if you're not familiar

with that debate well that it's about the fifty years we haven't add a

conversation we haven't been able in our society to be free enough to talk openly

and honestly about these questions and so we have to catch up now using the end

of the Cold War for that enhancement of our freedom of discussion and debate

that we should never have been deprived of in the first place now let me make it

real clear what I'm saying here it by using examples I'm going to start with

slavery slavery is an economic system is as existed for centuries in various

parts of the world including of course here in the United States wherever

slavery arrived in experienced what every economic system has always

experienced any that we've ever had there were people who loved it and

welcomed it and there were people who were critical of it the system survived

as long as those who loved it what kind of a majority in shaping public opinion

and in shaping the society and if and when those who didn't like it became

numerous and became influential well then that system began to disappear

every economic system we have had the communal the tribal the self-employment

the slave the feudal every one of them was born evolved over time and died the

burden is on anyone who's watching or listening to this program to imagine

that the latest one capitalism had a birth had an evolution but unlike every

other system will not die my guess is it will and that's just a guess based on

what every other system has done well let's go back to slavery why am I

talking about it because slavery had its detractors slavery had its critics

slavery had its dissident we know about that because when slavery

was ended both here in the United States in Britain and Europe and Asia Africa

Latin America it was a kind of notion that people had that it was good

riddance the human being shouldn't be the slaves of one another so there's a

kind of a residue of hostility so it's easy for me to show you and to explain

that slavery always had its critics who eventually helped that system to go on

and pass away but throughout the lives of his slave system you had again two

kinds of critics one set of critics said you know the slaves should be treated

better they're not being fed properly they're not being clothed properly they

don't have good places to live their families are being wrecked by their

owners selling different members of the family to other we want slaves to be

much better treated you might call these people reformists they wanted to reform

slavery to make it work better they wanted slavery with a more human face

then there were others who said to the first group are you nuts the problem

here isn't how well the employed steeped master treats the slave the problem is

we shouldn't have slavery we and we must do that because if all you do is get the

master to treat the slave a bit better then what's to prevent the master the

next chance he has from withdrawing whatever it is you've made him do nicely

and going back to what he did before there's no real security for the slave

not to be what a slave is at the mercy of the master and therefore the issue is

free the slave those two people those who wanted to reform slavery and those

who wanted to revolt against slavery and make a transition to another system is

the history of the struggle over slavery and a history that we now know was

eventually decided in favor of the revolutionaries because we don't have

slavery hardly at all anymore

now the parallel the reason I tell you the story about slavery is with

capitalism socialists can be easily divided into those who favor reform and

those who want something more what are the Reformers want they want the

government to come in and make for capitalism and more human-faced make

sure workers don't get less than a certain amount make sure where they work

is healthy and safe make sure that the tax system does a little bit to prevent

extreme inequalities of income that's what socialists or reforming socialists

or what in America is called Democratic so that's what they've wanted they

basically okay with capitalism but they want it to be reformed and then there

are others who say wait a bit stop even if you get the reforms if you leave the

capitalists in charge which is what you're basically saying they can and

will try to take back those reforms and you'll be in an endless struggle you get

a few you lose them you try again you lose

what has to be done is to change the organization of production no more

employers and employees well what would be the alternative well we know what it

is with slavery it was every person is equally free and in the critique of

capitalism of those socialists who want to go beyond reform the argument is

everybody is both an employer and an employee

no more dividing people between the one or the other it's like saying to the

slave you are now a master you want our slave then the words have no meaning

anymore you are free nobody owns you nobody can

tell you what to do anymore than you can tell them and it all has to be worked

out among free people well the argument of the socialist is no more employer

telling the worker what to do when to do it how to do it where to do it and then

taking the results of the workers work and acting as if it were all yours no no

no whatever the different people who

participate in production - they are all members of a team they are all equal and

they equally beside what is to be do be produced how its to be produced where

it's to be produced and what is to be done with the profit that all of them

together have worked to produce and the short answer for what we call that kind

of a system is worker coops and it's important to identify the this idea of

the Socialists with the worker co-op because worker coops are something that

an awful lot of people listening or watching this program all they know

about it's not some very distant foreign thing it's as American as apple pie for

example how do I know that because there are co-ops all over the United States in

every one of the 50 states in most communities one or another activity is

run as a co-op there are churches that run as a co-op there are grocery stores

that one is a co-op of the consumers there are businesses that are already

run as worker cooperatives we talk about some of them on this program the

socialism that existed in the 20th century the dominant socialism the

socialism identified with Russia and China Soviet Russia and the People's

Republic of China focused on the big picture what we might call the

macroeconomic perspective of socialism government ownership government planning

we now have a century of experience with that we see its strengths and there are

some and we see its weaknesses and there are plenty of those too and we've

learned and socialists are learning too and one of the conclusions drawn more

and more by socialists which is how socialism is changing has to do with

focusing more on the micro level the level of production the individual store

or office or factory and saying that's the root of

the problem and that's the solution area let us transform how we work how adults

spend most of their lives five out of seven days a week most of the adult

years of their lives they're at work in an office a store or a factory if that

were run democratically if that were run equally where everybody has a voice in

making all the big decisions we would change as human beings the community

would change the vision of socialism of going doing something better was always

lurking in this idea this is a way to say look it made sense to say to slavery

whatever you accomplished as a slave society we can preserve all or most of

it and yet do better by making people free and the end of feudalism came when

people said we can preserve the thousand years of feudal Europe its achievements

technically culturally but we can do better by saying nobody is a lord and a

serf anymore none of that the serfs are freed that's what the French Revolution

did and so the Socialists are now arguing and the point of here is not for

you to be persuaded the point is for you to understand the argument and then we

can have a debate and discussion and change it and that's all a healthy

society should do but the Socialists of today the emerging socialism is one that

says if we want to overcome the problems capitalism bequeaths us we hold on to

what capitalism achieved its successes and their planning but we also recognize

its flaws and its failures and we go to the root of that problem and we change

the relationship in production employer-employee is too close that

master slave and Lord serf and we have to see it and we have to

make the change. Thank you for your attention. I want to thank all of you for

being partners which is what we want all of you to be to share what we do on this

program with others to point them to the websites I want to thank a longtime

partner of ours Truthout.org that remarkable independent source of news

and analysis and I want to say and I mean it that I look forward to speaking

with you again next week

For more infomation >> Economic Update: Economics of Socialism - Duration: 58:01.

-------------------------------------------

Justice and Busy P - What's in My Bag? - Duration: 8:33.