People asked me to talk about Alternative For Sweden (AfS), Gustav Kasselstrands new party that's competing with the Sweden Democrats.
And here's my thoughts, don't you get why Swedish media are advertising AfS so much?
Their biggest hope is for SD to leak votes to them, so SD don't get a stronger position in parliament.
AfS prolly won't enter parliament but 3% less votes for SD is pretty crucial. It's the difference between Sweden Democrats being 1st party or Socialdemocrats.
So even if you like AfS more, it might not be wise to vote for them since it's a step back in general for decreased immigration.
AfS-supporters are often bad at seeing that they're doing precisely what the media elite wants them to do.
I've even been asked: "What does it matter if SD get 22% or 27%, there won't be a SD government regardless."
The difference is a Sweden where Jimmie Åkesson is prime minister.
Or not. You go on about meta-politics and how important it is to normalize migration critique.
What would normalize more than that? It would be an amazing cultural protest.
Åkesson as PM would give his voice more value.
More would be forced to view him and hear his ideas.
And it would be him traveling worldwide representing Sweden to other leaders, instead of globalists.
HUGE cultural statement
It would've said: "We're so sick of you in the seven-clover (7 out of 8) that we even prefer this!"
"And we're sick of Swedish citizens, regardless ethnic origin, being treated as second-hand citizens in their own country."
I as a legal immigrant get to pay more when going to the dentist than an illegal immigrant. Is that reasonable?
I don't buy that people vote SD because they like ALL their ideas, I think they do it, or I know they do it,
to protest. And it would be a strong protest.
But SD becoming second biggest party doesn't have the same cultural impact.
And AfS getting a few percent of the votes doesn't have an impact on the masses either.
Also, this year it's very possible that the Green Party, Liberals and Christian Democrats fall out.
SD:s role will then be stronger than ever, and offer even better chances to negiotate their policies through.
And it will be harder for the other parties to say "No", since they've already stolen their ideas from SD.
Should they attempt to it would become clearer than ever how ridiculous the parties are.
Which will undermine the publics trust, increase hate towards politicans and make SD even more popular the election after. And then you'll get your SD government.
However, what would happen if AfS got into parliament? They have no negotiating power,
and even if they would confront politicians with "uncomfortable questions" they'd just get ignored.
And the people won't care because AfS are too radical for the public anyway.
But I get the idea that voting for a small party doesn't have to be a waste, because it's not.
If you get 1% of the votes your ballot gets sent out automatically, which helps small parties immensely.
Because that means they won't need to travel through every city, in all of Sweden, and do it themselves.
Shitload of work. So instead they can spend time opinion-making, debating and improving the party.
And at 2,5% you get party funding, which also helps a lot with growing.
So I understand it's worth it to vote on small parties. But that's not the problem here.
The problem is we already have a migration-critical party who want to close the borders. We don't need another.
However, the same can't be said about the right. Medborgerlig Samling is also a small party.
But unlike AfS they have a good chance of entering parliament.
They're more anchored with people since they're not radical, and they could steal a lot of votes on the right.
We're talking right-wingers who wanna decrease immigration, but wouldn't vote for SD regardless.
Because they think SD are too socialist. Therefore I'm positive to MeD too.
I've met the party leader and I got a great impression. They have many good ideas.
And there's a lot I disagree with, but it's a decent right-wing that will not back down on their principles.
And I can think outside my own perspective.
Those who wanna see a real right-wing in Sweden, instead of this fake right that cowtows to the left, led by Milhouse Kristersson.
Those people should vote MeD.
MeD is what the Moderate party would look like if they let Hanif Bali run, instead of being ashamed of him.
Pretty demeaning to stay.
So there's 3 parties I can recommend if you wanna see change for real.
Sweden Democrats if you wanna decrease immigration, since they're the only credible party in this area.
Other parties won't have the balls. This is what they do every election, toughen up rhetoric and say what people wanna hear.
Just to win votes and ensure your fat politicians salary. Then you get power and do nothing.
Seriously, look up the different parties promises last election, and the one before. You'll see a pattern.
2. Medborgerlig Samling if you think SD are too leftist, or are uncomfortable with their history.
I'm pretty sure SD won't start concentration camps and put me in one. They're just what the Socialdemocrats were 30 years ago.
Nothing special. In any other country they wouldn't count as extreme.
You gotta see it from an international perspective too. But I understand not everyone feel the same.
And MeD still wanna decrease immigration, harshen sentences and rip up hate speech laws.
Which is much needed given all the pensioners who've gotten convicted for Facebook posts lately.
Cops are so stacked with murders they don't have time to investigate rapes
but they have time for Ulla-Britt, 87, who wrote something unpleasant about Somalis?
What kinda priorities are that?
MeD also wanna counter-act career-politicians, so those are important issues and some of the most relevant.
Then there's my personal favourite, the Directdemocrats.
This is the party for those who wanna protest the system. My problem with politics is
regardless what party I vote for there's lots I disagree with.
It's not enough to agree with a party on 60-70%. Why should I support ideas I dislike because it's "included"?
Therefore I think a system of "liquid democracy" with more referendums would be much better.
For example, had we done a referendum on immigration many years ago, SD wouldn't even be big today.
And we wouldn't have the problems we're seeing today. Because most Swedes wanna decrease immigration.
But they're not comfortable voting for the only party who wants that, for various reasons.
Liquid Democracy is when people can vote for parties, or just referendums on specific issues.
So if Immigration and Crime is all you care about, you'll only have to participate in those referendums.
But you can also mix it up. With LD you could vote for a party,
But if you disagree with the party on a specific issue, you can vote against them on that - while maintaining your vote for the party as a whole.
That way you can support the party in a lot, but not every single issue.
Some say direct democracy would cause social collapse, but that's just brainwashed.
First of all, this would be the same system as today but with more options.
Old system doesn't go away, you can still vote on parties, but if you're well-read you can just focus on specific issues if you want.
This would make people involved in politics, since their vote gets more meaning when they can influence more.
Second of all, Schweiz does direct democracy and it's going fine. So it's already been tested and works.
Then there's many who wanna vote blank, and you really shouldn't. I understand the need to protest like that.
I used to feel that way, but then I found out blank votes make no difference. They count as "invalid" votes.
Power is still distributed according to which party got most votes.
So let's say 70% of Sweden's population vote blank while Socialdemocrats get 20% and everyone else share 10%
Socialdemocrats would rule.
If you really wanna change the system it's better to vote in a party who wanna remake the system.
So I think Directdemocrats are a much better way of protesting.
And everyone who wants to legalize, vote for the Pirate Party. They're hitting that issue hard this year.
It's also the only party who cares about surveillance. So if you often get high and paranoid, it's good company.
Those are my tips to the deplorables. I'll leave party material in the video description so you can read up.
And I hope you get educated on what you vote for, because you don't wanna function like feminist voters.
No comments:
Post a Comment