Thursday, January 12, 2017

Youtube daily report Jan 13 2017

LAST NIGHT ALTHOUGH THE RUMORS WERE THAT THE VOTES WERE NOT

THERE, THE SENATE HAS TAKEN THE FIRST STEP TOWARD A FULL REPEAL

OF THE AFFORDABLE CARE ACT.

SUPPOSEDLY THE VOTES WERE NOT

THERE, AND SO FAR THE REPLACEMENT IS NOT EVEN ON THE

HORIZON, BUT THE FIRST STEP WAS TAKEN, AND IT WAS DONE THROUGH

BUDGET RECONCILIATION WHICH WE WILL TALK ABOUT.

THAT IS AN

INTERESTING PROCESS WHEREBY YOU CAN PASS CONTENTIOUS BILLS WITH

51 VOTES AS OPPOSED TO THE FILIBUSTER PROOF 60 YOU WOULD

NORMALLY NEED.

NOT JUST THE BILL, BUT EVEN THE MOVE TO HAVE

THE BILL REQUIRE 51 ONLY REQUIRES 51 --

WHICH IS A REALLY INTERESTING WAY TO PHRASE IT, CONSIDERING

THAT WE KNOW FROM ANY NUMBER OF INDEPENDENT ANALYSES THAT THIS

WILL NOT REDUCE THE DEFICIT, THIS WILL MASSIVELY EXPAND THE

DEFICIT.

TWO IMPORTANT PARTS TO FOCUS ON.

ONE IS THEY HAVE BEGUN, THEY

HAVE BEGUN REPEALING OBAMACARE.

I WHICH I PUT IT ON TAPE, I

WASN'T ON THE SHOW YESTERDAY, I'LL DO FURTHER PREDICTIONS IN A

SECOND, THE WHOLE IDEA THAT, OH, THE REPUBLICANS MIGHT NOT HAVE

VOTED WITH THIS?

OF COURSE THEY ARE GOING TO VOTE TO REPEAL

OBAMACARE, AND OF COURSE THEY WILL VOTE TO DO IT IN A PARTISAN

WAY.

WHO DO YOU THINK THEY ARE?

LET ME GO ON THE RECORD WITH AN

EVEN BIGGER, BOLDER PREDICTION.

THEY WILL REPEAL OBAMACARE,

THEY'RE JUST GOING TO REPEAL IT.

NO IFS, ANDS, OR BUTS.

REPEAL.

PEOPLE SAY CENK, WAIT A MINUTE, THERE ARE A LOT OF REASONS, AND

GOOD ARGUMENTS -- SOME PARTS OF OBAMACARE, THE HEALTH INDUSTRY

WANTS.

SOME REPUBLICANS MIGHT WANT TO KEEP THAT.

I HEAR YOU,

BROTHER.

AND IT WILL BE SUPER HARD TO DO IT, THEN YOU WILL

HAVE 20 OR 30 MILLION PEOPLE WHO ALL OF A SUDDEN DON'T HAVE

HEALTHCARE AND THAT IS BAD POLITICS.

YOU GUYS DON'T GET IT,

THERE ARE NO BRAKES IN THE REPUBLICAN CAR, ONLY A GAS

PEDAL.

THEY WILL GO FULL SPEED AHEAD AND DO EVERYTHING YOU

THINK IS NOT DOABLE, THEY WILL NOT HESITATE.

OBAMACARE, I COULD

BE WRONG, IT'S A BOLD PREDICTION BECAUSE ALMOST EVERYBODY IS

SAYING NO, BUT NOT EXACTLY, OF COURSE THEY ARE AGAINST IT,

EVERYBODY KNOWS THAT, BUT THEY WILL LEAVE THIS PART AND THAT

PART AND TAKE YEARS TO DO IT.

MY GUESS IS, NO, THEY WILL STEAMROLL IT AND WE ARE

DONE WITH IT.

THERE IS EVIDENCE THAT THEY WERE CONFLICTED.

THAT IS WHY

EVERY SENATE REPUBLICAN EXCEPT SENATOR RAND PAUL VOTED TO

REPEAL THIS, EVERY SENATE DEMOCRATS VOTED AGAINST IT.

IT

WAS 51/48, WHICH SHOWS YOU HOW IMPORTANT SENATE ELECTIONS ARE.

AS THIS GOES FORWARD, AGAIN AS I SAID IN THE INTRO, THERE ARE

STILL NO DETAILS ABOUT WHAT THEY WILL THEORETICALLY REPLACE IT

WITH AT SOME POINT.

TRUMP OFFERED NONE IN HIS PRESS

CONFERENCE, THEY HAVE OFFERED DONE NOW, AND I WAS REMEMBERING,

I WAS TALKING TO EDWIN EARLIER, REMEMBER DURING THE PRIMARY WHEN

WE WERE HAVING WHAT I THINK WAS AN AWESOME DEBATE ABOUT THE

COMPETING PROPOSALS TO EXPAND OBAMACARE?

HILLARY CLINTON SAID

I WANT TO DO IT THIS WAY, BERNIE SANDERS SAYS I WANT TO DO IT

THIS WAY.

I THOUGHT HIS WAS WAY BETTER.

THAT IS SO FAR AWAY FROM

REPEALING THE ENTIRE THING, BUT THAT IS WHERE WE HAVE MOVED TO

AT THIS POINT.

THERE ARE A LOT OF CONSEQUENCES AND YOU WANT TO

TALK MORE ABOUT THE BUDGET RECONCILIATION, FIRST IF WE

COULD BRING UP THIS CHART, YOU WILL SEE THE MASSIVE TAX CUTS

THAT THIS WILL PRODUCE FOR 400 OF THE RICHEST INDIVIDUALS IN

AMERICA.

400 OF THE RICHEST HOUSEHOLDS, I SHOULD SAY. $2.8

BILLION TAX CUT THAT THEY WILL RECEIVE, WHICH IF YOU COMPARE

THAT TO THE SIZE OF THE COST OF THE SUBSIDY FOR OBAMACARE, IT

TOTALS ALL OF THOSE DIFFERENT STATES.

SO TO GET HEALTHCARE FOR

PEOPLE IN ALL OF THOSE DIFFERENT STATES, 20 STATES AND DC,

INSTEAD LET'S TAKE THAT MONEY AND PUT IT IN A NICE ENVELOPE

AND SEND IT TO THE 400 RICHEST HOUSES IN AMERICA.

LET ME GIVE YOU MORE CONTEXT TO THAT, SO YOU UNDERSTAND.

800,000 PEOPLE WOULD HAVE GOTTEN TAX CREDITS WHICH ALLOW THEM TO

GET INSURANCE.

NOW WHEN THEY DO THIS, THEY WILL NOT GET THAT

ANYMORE.

BUT THE 400 RICHEST HOUSEHOLDS WILL GET ON EVERY $7

MILLION APIECE.

SO YOU ELECT REPUBLICANS AND THE RICH

LITERALLY GET RICHER, AND YOU DON'T HAVE HEALTHCARE ANYMORE.

IF YOU ARE AMONG THE 20 OR 30 MILLION THEY WILL TAKE IT AWAY

FROM, THAT IS VERY LITTLE.

IN THAT CASE THAT IS 800,000 PEOPLE

WHO WOULD HAVE GOTTEN CREDIT TO GET HEALTHCARE, GONE.

AND THESE

ARE THE 400 RICHEST HOUSEHOLDS, THEIR AVERAGE INCOME -- NOT

WEALTH -- PER YEAR IS $318 MILLION PER YEAR.

BUT WHICH CITY DO THEY LIVE IN?

BECAUSE COST-OF-LIVING --

I HEAR YOU.

BUT THOSE GUYS MAKING $318 MILLION A YEAR, THEY

NEEDED ANOTHER 7 MILLION SO TRUMP AND THE REPUBLICANS ARE

LIKE, GREAT, LET'S TAKE AWAY HEALTH INSURANCE FOR AVERAGE

AMERICANS AND GIVE THE RICHEST PEOPLE IN THE COUNTRY ANOTHER $7

MILLION ON AVERAGE PER YEAR.

YOU VOTE FOR REPUBLICANS, THAT'S THE

RESULT YOU GET.

IF YOU DON'T GET IT, YOU ARE AN IDIOT.

THAT'S NOT

FAIR, A LOT OF YOU DON'T KNOW SO YOU ARE IN.

OR YOU SAY I THINK

THE POOR SON OF A BITCH MAKING 318 MILLION-A-YEAR NEEDS TO MAKE

325, SO I AND WILLING TO GIVE UP MY HEALTH INSURANCE, WHO CARES

IF MY KIDS DIE OVER IT?

IT AFFECTS ONLY 2% OF THEIR INCOME,

BUT NOPE, THE HEALTH INSURANCE FOR ALL THOSE FOLKS, GONE.

AND

YOU START TO TALK ABOUT BUDGET RECONCILIATION YOUR EYES GLOSS

OVER, IT IS A PROCEDURAL TACTIC IN CONGRESS.

HOLD ON -- HOW THE

MEDIA COVERS IT IS IMPORTANT BECAUSE IT GOES TO WHETHER --

THEY BRAG ABOUT WHETHER THEY ARE NEUTRAL, I DON'T THINK THAT IS

RIGHT, I THINK YOU SHOULD BE OBJECTIVE.

BUT THEY ARE NOT EVEN

NEUTRAL, THEY ARE TOTALLY PRO-REPUBLICAN.

IF YOU ARE

WATCHING THIS AND PART OF THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA, NO WAY, I'VE

BEEN ACCUSED OF BEING PRO-LIBERAL FOR 40 YEARS.

SO HOW

DO THEY LEAN TOWARD REPUBLICANS?

WHEN OBAMA WAS CONSIDERING DOING

RECONCILIATION TO PASS OBAMACARE IN THE FIRST PLACE, HE THOUGHT

ABOUT IT FOR A YEAR, HE RUNG HIS HANDS, AND THE PRESS CONSTANTLY

YELLED AT HIM, AND I WAS THERE, I COVERED IT THEY IN AND DAY

OUT, AND THE NEW YORK TIMES SAID OBAMA HAD PROMISED TO TRANSCEND

PARTISAN SPLITS BUT IF HE DID RECONCILIATION THAT WOULD BE A

PARTISAN THING TO DO.

THEY ALSO SAID HE PROMISED TO BUILD

POLITICAL CONSENSUS, AND YOU DON'T DO THAT BY DOING

RECONCILIATION.

NOW REPUBLICANS ARE DOING, AND I SAID THEY

WOULDN'T HESITATE ONE DAY.

A YEAR?

TRUMP ISN'T EVEN PRESIDENT YET.

AND THEY ALREADY DID IT.

NEW YORK TIMES, WASHINGTON POST,

WHERE ARE YOU?

I DON'T HEAR YOU.

WHY DON'T YOU YELL AT

REPUBLICANS AND TRUMP ABOUT BIPARTISANSHIP LIKE YOU DID WITH

OBAMA?

NOW, LET ME GO TO REPUBLICAN HYPOCRISY.

SENATOR

JOHN CORNYN AT THE TIME WHEN DEMOCRATS WERE DOING IT CALLED

IT --

NOW HE VOTED IN FAVOR OF IT AND SAYS HYPER-PARTISANSHIP IS

AWESOME.

WHEN WE ARE IN CHARGE, YAY HYPER-PARTISANSHIP.

SO THIS

IS LIKE, OF COURSE, REPUBLICANS USE RECONCILIATION, THERE IS NOT

EVEN ANY DEBATE.

WE ARE DONE IN, IN ESSENCE, LESS THAN A DAY

BECAUSE TRUMP IS NOT EVEN PRESIDENT.

BACK THEN JOHN

BOEHNER SAID OBAMA HAD --

THAT IS EXACTLY WHAT THE REPUBLICANS JUST DID.

NOW THE

WASHINGTON POST BACK THEN SAID, THIS IS BACK IN 2010 --

SO OBAMA FOR A YEAR REACHED OUT TO CONSERVATIVES, THAT IS IN

THE ARTICLE BACK IN 2010, HE DID A BIPARTISAN HEALTH CARE SUMMIT.

HE OFFERED TO PUT THEIR PROPOSALS IN THE BILL AND

STILL GOT ZERO REPUBLICAN VOTES.

I

WOULD ARGUE THAT HE DID PUT MANY OF THEIR PROPOSALS IN THE BILL.

HE DID UNILATERALLY, AND THEY STILL DIDN'T VOTE FOR IT.

DO YOU

SEE TRUMP IN THE REPUBLICANS REACHING OUT?

CHUCK SCHUMER,

WHAT WOULD YOU LIKE IN THE BILL?

BERNIE SANDERS, ELIZABETH

WARREN, LET'S DO A SUMMIT.

THE MEDIA DEMANDED A SUMMIT WHEN IT

WAS OBAMA, WHEN IS REPUBLICANS THERE IS NO NEED FOR

BIPARTISANSHIP, WE ARE DONE WITH IT.

BACK THEN THE WASHINGTON

POST DESCRIBED RECONCILIATION AS A --

NOW NO ONE EVEN COMMENTS ON IT.

THIS IS THE ONLY TIME YOU

WILL SEE A COMMENT ON IT.

TURN ON CNN, WHATEVER, NO WAY.

NEW

YORK TIMES, WASHINGTON POST, NOTHING.

THEY JUST WRITE IT LIKE

A MATTER OF COURSE, OF COURSE WHEN REPUBLICANS ARE IN CHARGE

WE DO RECONCILIATION, WE DON'T NEED FILIBUSTERS AND THERE IS NO

NEED TO SLOW DOWN, YOU ONLY NEED 51 VOTES AND OFF WE GO.

IT IS

NOT RISKY OR BIPARTISAN, JUST A MATTER OF FACT.

SO DEMOCRATS,

STOP LISTENING TO REPUBLICANS AND THE CORPORATE MEDIA, THEY

DON'T HAVE YOUR BEST INTERESTS IN MIND.

WHENEVER YOU ARE IN

CHARGE THEY WANT YOU TO SLOW DOWN AND NOT DO ANYTHING, AND

WHEN REPUBLICANS ARE IN CHARGE, FULL STEAM AHEAD.

AND BY THE

WAY, WHERE ARE DEMOCRATS DEMANDING SUMMIT ON TOP OF

SUMMIT?

BACK THEN REPUBLICANS FOUGHT RECONCILIATION FOR A

YEAR, AND YOU KNOW HOW THEY WOULD FIGHT IT?

EVERY TIME IT

WAS PROPOSED THEY WOULD DO AMENDMENTS, I NEED ANOTHER VOTE,

ANOTHER AMENDMENT -- DEMOCRATS, WHERE WAS THE FIGHT?

GONE IN

ONE DAY.

THERE HAVE BEEN SOME WHO ARE NOT HAPPY ABOUT THIS, YOU

MIGHT RECOGNIZE THIS GUY.

THE PASSAGE OF THIS BUDGET RESOLUTION WILL ALLOW

REPUBLICANS TO COME BACK TO THE FLOOR OF THE SENATE WITH A

BUDGET RECONCILIATION PACKAGE WHICH WILL REPEAL THE ACA WITH A

SIMPLE MAJORITY, AND IF THEY DO THAT, UP TO 30 MILLION AMERICANS

WILL LOSE THEIR HEALTHCARE, WITH MANY THOUSANDS DYING AS A

RESULT.

BECAUSE YOU HAVE NO HEALTH INSURANCE, AND YOU CAN'T

GO TO A DOCTOR OR A HOSPITAL, YOU DIE.

MEDICARE WILL BE

CONVERTED INTO A VOUCHER PROGRAM, MEDICAID WILL BE

DECIMATED.

RURAL HOSPITALS WILL BE CLOSED.

AND THEY HAVE NO

ALTERNATIVE PROPOSITION.

THEY WANT TO KILL ACA, BUT THEY HAVE

NO IDEA ABOUT HOW THEY ARE GOING TO BRING FORTH A SUBSTITUTE

PROPOSAL.

THIS IS NOT WHAT THE AMERICAN PEOPLE WANT.

I WOULD

YIELD TO MY FRIENDS IF THEY WILL TELL ME NOW WHAT THE REPLACEMENT

IS.

HOW MANY OF THOSE 30 MILLION PEOPLE ARE GOING TO DIE?

WHAT IS

YOUR PLAN TO COVER THEM?

PLUS THE OTHER 28 MILLION PEOPLE WHO

HAVE NO HEALTH INSURANCE?

HOW ARE YOU GOING TO END THE

INTERNATIONAL EMBARRASSMENT OF THE UNITED STATES BEING THE ONLY

MAJOR COUNTRY ON EARTH NOT TO GUARANTEE HEALTHCARE TO ALL

PEOPLE?

THEY DON'T HAVE A PLAN.

GOD, THAT IS REFRESHING.

WHAT IS MORE REFRESHING THAN ANYTHING

ELSE, AND THIS IS A POSITIVE CHANGE IN THE MEDIA -- WHEN

BERNIE SANDERS SPOKE IN THE PAST THE REST OF THE CORPORATE MEDIA

WAS LIKE, IRRELEVANT, INDEPENDENT SENATOR FROM

VERMONT.

NOW WHEN HE SPEAKS PEOPLE ARE LIKE, OH. AND HE PUTS

PEOPLE ON THE SPOT.

NOW ALL OF A SUDDEN WE HAVE A WATCHER ON THE

WALL.

No comments:

Post a Comment