Thursday, May 4, 2017

Youtube daily report May 5 2017

It turns out that intentionally telling the universe that your civilization exists might

not be that easy.

You could set up radio beacons that repeat and send out mathematical signals at the hydrogen

line that would be unambiguous and tell anyone else that might be listening with a radio

telescope that they are not alone.

But to do it, you need energy and energy is expensive.

While this does not preclude any civilizations from setting up just such a beacon, we have

yet to detect one.

And if we take ourselves as an example, we've really only sent out a few signals, mostly

unintentional radar, that would be easily detectable at long distance and even then,

most of those did not repeat, missing SETI's main criteria for a verifiable signal.

Whether you agree or disagree with proactively trying to contact alien species, it's clear

that to do so in a meaningful, sustained way would be unlikely because it simply costs

to much to do it.

And, even if you do, it's a serious long shot.

But there are cheaper ways than radio.

If your intention is to merely tell others that there is indeed other intelligent life

in the universe one way to do that would be to simply suspend baffles in front of your

star that block the light in an unnatural way.

Just put up a geometric baffle, or a series of baffles that would appear to anyone looking

with a Kepler-type telescope as distinctive, regular dips in your star's light curve.

Now, Kepler never saw any such thing.

And even a potential candidate for this, the day 792 dip in the Boyajian's star's light

curve, does not quite fit the profile of what something like this would look like.

And, to add to that, there are engineering questions about building baffles that large,

whether it would be a monolithic object or an arranged cloud of smaller objects and given

that large structures, even very thin ones, require lots of matter to construct.

But what happens if you create something that blocks a star's light like a baffle for reasons

other than announcing yourself to the universe?

A new paper by Eric Gaidos of the University of Hawaii proposes just such a thing and a

method for detecting them, link in the description below.

Planets orbiting stars similar to our sun have a problem.

As stars like the sun age, they grow more luminous and become hotter.

That pushes the star's habitability zone further out and planets similar to earth experience

runaway greenhouse effects as their liquid water evaporates.

Water vapor is a good greenhouse gas, and the hotter it gets on that planet, the more

water will evaporate.

Water is a molecule of hydrogen and oxygen, and the radiation from the star will break

that molecule up and the hydrogen will escape the atmosphere entirely.

Eventually, that planet becomes uninhabitable and waterless.

This process, unless someone intervenes, is inevitable for our own planet.

A common misconception about earth is that it still has 4.5 billion years to live and

that life on earth is safe until then.

But that's not the case.

While the planet will remain for 4.5 billion more years, and might even survive longer

as a scorched cinder orbiting the sun in its red giant phase, life on it has far less time.

Climate science is highly complicated and that's led to a lot of estimates of just when

this process will begin for earth.

It could happen as soon as 600 million years from now, or take as long as 1.5 billion years.

But if we're still around in those days, there are several things we can do about the brightening

of the sun.

One of them is a surprisingly simple idea: block some of the sun's light with a baffle

to cool things down.

The paper details that any civilization in such a position and having built a starshade

should be detectable using our current equipment or at least the upcoming James Webb Space

Telescope as the planet and starshade pass in front of their star and block the light.

They might also use such a starshade to moderate their climate, or even reflect their star's

light to areas of the planet in darkness perhaps to improve agriculture if they have it or

something like it.

Baffles and starshades are interesting because they would be more easily detected than many

of the other signatures of alien life.

And, unlike other methods in SETI there is a higher chance of accidentally stumbling

across these during routine astronomy, such as what happened with Kepler and Boyajian's

star and its weirdness.

After this paper, we now know what to look for regarding starshades, so add their detection

to the growing list of ways we might soon detect an alien civilization.

Thanks for listening!

I am futurist and science fiction author John Michael Godier currently with a new book in

the works, it's called Supermind and a 5000 word excerpt is up at Amazon Kindle Scout

for only four more days, link in the description below, check it out and if you like it give

it a nomination!

And be sure to check out my other books at your favorite online book retailer and subscribe

to my channel for regular, in-depth explorations into the interesting, weird and unknown aspects

of this amazing universe in which we live.

For more infomation >> Detecting Alien Baffles and Starshades - Duration: 4:59.

-------------------------------------------

Is the Hyperloop Safe from Terrorists? - Duration: 2:54.

This is the speed of a car, and this...is tube travel.

Today's question: Would tube travel really be safe?

Some people claim that it would be the safest form of transportation because it's immune

to weather and human error.

Others see it as a target for terrorism.

One of the most concerning dangers...is tube implosion

Yeah we can put people in there.

Ok, so tube implosion is a big problem,

but thickening the walls of the tube...can prevent it.

Tubes have a threshold called the critical pressure

This pressure must be well above atmospheric to prevent vacuum implosion.

Pc increases with the cube of wall thickness, so doubling the wall thickness will multiply

the critical pressure by 8.

Elon Musk proposed a steel wall thickness of just under an inch.

It turns out this thickness would be enough to prevent implosion.

Next, I want to consider a full pressure breach.

Let's say a terrorist manages to destroy a section of the tube so that the remaining

sections are open to the atmosphere.

A shock wave would rush through the tube followed by a supersonic air flow.

Luckily, the air expands so quickly that its pressure and density become low.

So what happens when this wave of air hits the first pod?

Not exactly.

The external pressure that the pod experiences is still low compared to the pressure inside

the pod, which is atmospheric, so structurally the pod would be fine.

The real concern is the acceleration that the drag force causes.

The pods need to slow down quickly enough to prevent a collision, but not enough to

harm the passengers inside.

Using reasonable dimensions, the drag force comes in at about 30,000 lb.

This force would help the pods slow down.

The exact deceleration depends on the pod's mass.

A small pod with 6 people would decelerate with about 5 G's, whereas a large pod with

30 people would decelerate with about 1 G.

If the pods needed to decelerate at a higher or lower rate, the propulsion system could

make up the difference.

So in conclusion, it looks like safety won't be a deal breaker.

Thanks for watching, and I hope to see you next time on Tube Travel.

For more infomation >> Is the Hyperloop Safe from Terrorists? - Duration: 2:54.

-------------------------------------------

Level Guide | How many shapes it takes | Diep.io - Duration: 4:11.

diep.io level guide

For more infomation >> Level Guide | How many shapes it takes | Diep.io - Duration: 4:11.

-------------------------------------------

How to survive in Hong Kong Wet market? (2) - Fruit's names in Cantonese - Duration: 4:37.

For more infomation >> How to survive in Hong Kong Wet market? (2) - Fruit's names in Cantonese - Duration: 4:37.

-------------------------------------------

SVA - Temesd az istent [S2] - Duration: 1:21.

For more infomation >> SVA - Temesd az istent [S2] - Duration: 1:21.

-------------------------------------------

CAN YOU HEAL a BROKEN SHIELD!? | Clash Royale Mythbusters #11! - Duration: 10:21.

CAN YOU HEAL a BROKEN SHIELD!? | Clash Royale Mythbusters #11!

For more infomation >> CAN YOU HEAL a BROKEN SHIELD!? | Clash Royale Mythbusters #11! - Duration: 10:21.

-------------------------------------------

Chelsea Clinton Runs Her Big Mouth At Trump – GETS SHUT DOWN IMMEDIATELY! - Duration: 2:24.

Chelsea Clinton Runs Her Big Mouth At Trump – GETS SHUT DOWN IMMEDIATELY!

Ever since her mother's loss in the presidential election, Chelsea Clinton has tried to make

a name for herself by repeatedly bashing Donald Trump on Twitter.

She tried to do this once again on Monday, but unfortunately for Chelsea, her latest

attack ended up blowing up in her face in a big way.

During an interview this week, Trump said that former President Andrew Jackson could

have prevented the Civil War had he served at a later date.

"I mean had Andrew Jackson been a little bit later, you wouldn't have had the Civil

War.

He was a very tough person, but he had a big heart," Trump told the Washington Examiner.

Feeling triggered by Trump's statement, Chelsea fired back on Twitter.

"1 word answer: Slavery.

Longer: When Andrew Jackson died in 1845 (16 yrs before the Civil War began), he owned

150 men, women and children," Chelsea wrote, according to Mad World News.

It didn't take long for Chelsea to realize that all she'd accomplished with this tweet

was exposing her own ignorance.

"Clinton failed to acknowledge that Jackson founded the Democratic party.

Clinton's rant completely left out that he created the party her entire family aligns

and identifies with publicly.

People across social media lambasted her on Twitter for her hypocrisy," reported BizPac

Review.

Twitter users took it upon themselves to let Chelsea know that she'd made a big mistake:

SHARE this story if you think Chelsea Clinton is a FOOL who should keep her big mouth SHUT

about politics!

For more infomation >> Chelsea Clinton Runs Her Big Mouth At Trump – GETS SHUT DOWN IMMEDIATELY! - Duration: 2:24.

-------------------------------------------

Rep. Ami Bera: This Was A Bad Vote | Hardball | MSNBC - Duration: 5:32.

STEPHANIE GOSS. WE'LL BE BACK TO CHECK IN LATER

AS THE PRESIDENT MAKES HIS ARRIVAL.

NOW TO THE HOUSE VOTE TO REPEAL OBAMACARE.

I'M JOINED BY STEVE RATNER, AN CHECK ADVISER TO PRESIDENT

OBAMA. THANK YOU FOR JOINING US.

CONGRESSMAN, WHAT DOES THIS MEAN, THIS VOTE?

I NOTICE THAT REPUBLICANS SQUEAKED IT TODAY.

THEY ONLY HAD ONE EXTRA VOTE. OBVIOUSLY THERE'S 20 REPUBLICANS

DIDN'T WANT TO VOTE FOR IT AND A LOT MORE WOULD LIKE TO HAVE NOT

VOTED FOR IT. YOU HAD DID YOU SEE IT AS A

POLITICAL MOVE TODAY? >> AS A DOCTOR, A LOT OF THEM

KNEW THIS WAS A BAD BILL THAT WAS GOING TO HURT PATIENTS AND

CONSTITUENTS. THERE WAS A LOT OF ARM TWISTING

GOING ON. THIS WAS A BAD VOTE.

AGAIN, IT'S GOING TO HURT A LOT OF PATIENTS.

>> WHEN YOU'RE DOWN ON THE FLOOR, CAN YOU TELL THE PRESSURE

ON REPUBLICANS TO GET UP TO THE 217?

>> YEAH, THEY DIDN'T HAVE THAT LOOK OF ENTHUSIASM ON THEIR

FACE, PARTICULARLY THROUGHOUT THIS WEEK AS YOU SAW THEM KIND

OF TWIST ARMS AND WHIP THE VOTE HERE.

SO, AGAIN, I THINK A LOT OF THEM KNOW THIS WAS A VERY DIFFICULT

VOTE THAT'S GOING TO HURT A LOT OF THEIR OWN CONSTITUENTS.

>> LET ME GO TO STEVE. STEVE, I UNDERSTAND YOU'VE GOT A

REALLY GOOD ANALYSIS OF WHO THE WINNERS AND LOSERS ARE TO PUT IT

BLUNTLY UNDER THIS BILL. >> I DON'T THINK THERE ARE A LOT

OF WINNERS. I THINK THERE ARE A FAIR NUMBER

OF LOSERS. FIRST OF ALL, LET'S GO BACK TO

THE ORIGINAL BILL, WHICH INCLUDED MASSIVE CUTS IN

MEDICAID, MASSIVE CUTS IN SUBSIDIES FOR PEOPLE WHO ARE

ABOVE THE MEDICAID LEVEL BUT NOT REALLY ABLE TO PAY FOR

THEMSELVES, AND THEN THE NEW BILL ADDED TO THAT THE ABILITY

OF STATES TO GET OUT OF THE TEN BASIC REQUIREMENTS AS WELL AS TO

GET OUT OF THE REQUIREMENT THAT INSURERS CHARGE PEOPLE WITH

PRE-EXISTING CONDITIONS THE SAME AS PEOPLE WITHOUT THEM.

SO I CAN'T THINK OF MANY WINNERS.

THERE ARE A LOT OF LOSERS. >> HERE'S A CHART PUT OUT BY THE

CENTER FOR AMERICAN PROGRESS, A PROGRESSIVE THINK TANK.

IT SHOWS HOW MUCH MORE A YEAR SOME WITH CERTAIN

PRE-CONDITIONS, EXISTING CONDITIONS, MIGHT HAVE TO PAY

COMPARED TO A HEALTHY 40-YEAR-OLD PERSON.

FOR EXAMPLE, SOMEONE WITH METASTATIC CANCER WOULD PAY MORE

THAN $140,000 A YEAR. SOME WITH DEPRESSION WOULD PAY

AN EXTRA $8,500. SOMEONE WITH ASTHMA WOULD PAY

MORE THAN $4,000 MORE. I THINK DIABETES IS ABOUT

$5,000, WHICH MATTERS TO ME. THESE ARE REAL DIFFERENCES.

IN OTHER WORDS, THEY'VE BEEN THROWING THOSE PEOPLE INTO A

HIGH RISK POOL WHERE THEY'D HAVE TO PAY A LOT MORE.

>> YEAH, AND WE'VE TRIED HIGH RISK POOLS BEFORE AND THEY NEVER

WORK. WHAT ENDS UP HAPPENING IS FOLKS

CAN'T GET THE HEALTH CARE THEY NEED.

THEY END UP ON WAITING LISTS. HOW DO YOU TELL SOMEONE WITH

CANCER, OH, YOU'VE GOT TO GO ON A WAITING LIST?

THAT'S WHY WE TOOK THE APPROACH WE DID WITH THE AFFORDABLE CARE

ACT, GUARANTEEING COVERAGE. THIS IS GOING TO TAKE HEALTH

CARE AWAY OR MAKE IT UNAFFORDABLE FOR MILLIONS OF

AMERICANS. >> THIS IDEA THAT FOR

$8 BILLION -- IT SEEMS A LOT OF MONEY, BUT IT'S OVER FIVE YEARS,

WHICH IS $1.5 BILLION A YEAR. THEY SAY -- I THINK IT IS A

BAND-AID ON THIS BILL. SO A WEEK AGO OR TWO WEEKS AGO,

THIS BILL WOULD NEVER PASS. THEY PUT THE BAND-AID ON IT AND

SAID WE'RE GOING TO HAVE THIS SUBSIDY.

WE'RE GOING TO WRITE A CHECK FROM THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT TO

COVER THOSE PEOPLE, BUT NOBODY BELIEVES THE $1.5 BILLION A YEAR

WILL COVER ALL THE PEOPLE IN THIS COUNTRY'S HEALTH INSURANCE

COSTS, MEDICINES, PILLS, DOCTORS, HOSPITALIZATION.

ALL OF THAT IS GOING TO BE COVERED FOR ABOUT $1.5 BILLION A

YEAR. NOBODY BELIEVES THAT.

>> I DON'T KNOW ANY HEALTH CARE EXPERT OR ECONOMIST THAT

BELIEVES THAT. THAT'S A DROP IN THE BUCKET FOR

WHAT'S NEEDED, AND I BET STEVE WOULD AGREE WITH THAT.

>> LET'S GO ALONG WITH THAT NUMBER BECAUSE IT LOOKED TO ME

AS A PALIATIVE AS A DOCTOR MIGHT SAY.

>> IT'S SUBMITTED IT WOULD COST ANYWHERE FROM $200 BILLION TO

$330 BILLION TO PROVIDE THESE HIGH-RISK POOLS THAT ARE

ADEQUATE TO COVER EVERYBODY. THE HOUSE BILL INCLUDED BEFORE

THE $8 BILLION, INCLUDED $130 BILLION TOWARD A VARIETY OF

THINGS, THANNING ONE OF THEM. THEN $8 BILLION WAS ADDED.

THE POINT IS THEY'RE UP TO $200 BILLION SHORT OF WHAT WOULD

BE NEEDED TO MAKE SURE EVERYBODY IN THE HIGH-RISK CATEGORY WITH

THE PRE-EXISTING CONDITIONS GOT COVERAGE.

SO THE $8 BILLION, AS YOU SURMISED, IS A COMPLETE DROP IN

THE BUCKET. >> I COULD TELL THAT BECAUSE I

SAW THE ANALYSIS OF WHAT HAD BEEN SPENT BEFORE TO COVER THESE

HIGH RISK PATIENTS. THE BILL IS SURE TO FACE A

TOUGHER CHALLENGE WHEN IT HEADS TO THE SENATE.

SENATOR LINDSEY GRAHAM TWEETED TODAY, A BILL, FINALIZED

YESTERDAY, HAS NOT BEEN SCORED. AMENDMENTS NOT ALLOWED.

THREE HOURS FINAL DEBATE. SHOULD BE VIEWED WITH CAUTION.

HERE'S SENATOR BOB CORKER THIS MORNING.

>> IS THERE ANY CHANCE IF IT PASSES THE HOUSE TODAY, IS THERE

ANY CHANCE FOR AN UP OR DOWN VOTE IN THE SENATE ON THE BILL

AS WRITTEN TO GET IT QUICKLY PASSED AND MOVE QUICKLY PAST THE

ISSUE FOR REPUBLICANS? >> NO.

>> ZERO? >> IT'S JUST THAT'S NOT THE WAY

IT'S GOING TO WORK. PEOPLE ARE GOING TO WANT TO

IMPROVE IT. I DON'T SEE ANY WAY THAT IT GOES

BACK IN THE FORM THAT IT COMES. >> WELL, YOU KNOW, CONGRESSMAN,

HERE'S THE PROBLEM IF YOU'RE A REPUBLICAN AT THE WHITE HOUSE,

ONE OF THESE LOBBYISTS TRYING TO GET THIS THROUGH.

YOU KNOW YOU PASSED THIS WITH ONE VOTE TO SPEAR.

YOU HAD TO BEG THE FREEDOM CAUCUS PEOPLE.

YOU HAD TO TAKE THE MODERATE REPUBLICANS FROM A LOT OF

VULNERABLE SEATS IN PENNSYLVANIA LIKE BARLETTA, WHO WAS GOING TO

RUN AGAINST BOB CASEY FOR THE SENATE.

A LOT OF THESE GUYS FACE REAL PROBLEMS, SO YOU SQUEEZE THEM.

NOW HAVING SAID TO THEM, THIS IS AS BAD AS IT'S GOING TO GET, YOU

TAKE IT OVER TO THE SENATE. THE SENATE IS MUCH LESS RIGHT

WING. THE BILL COMES B

For more infomation >> Rep. Ami Bera: This Was A Bad Vote | Hardball | MSNBC - Duration: 5:32.

-------------------------------------------

Trends 1 "They're asleep" - Duration: 1:03.

For more infomation >> Trends 1 "They're asleep" - Duration: 1:03.

-------------------------------------------

Is the Hyperloop Safe from Terrorists? - Duration: 2:54.

This is the speed of a car, and this...is tube travel.

Today's question: Would tube travel really be safe?

Some people claim that it would be the safest form of transportation because it's immune

to weather and human error.

Others see it as a target for terrorism.

One of the most concerning dangers...is tube implosion

Yeah we can put people in there.

Ok, so tube implosion is a big problem,

but thickening the walls of the tube...can prevent it.

Tubes have a threshold called the critical pressure

This pressure must be well above atmospheric to prevent vacuum implosion.

Pc increases with the cube of wall thickness, so doubling the wall thickness will multiply

the critical pressure by 8.

Elon Musk proposed a steel wall thickness of just under an inch.

It turns out this thickness would be enough to prevent implosion.

Next, I want to consider a full pressure breach.

Let's say a terrorist manages to destroy a section of the tube so that the remaining

sections are open to the atmosphere.

A shock wave would rush through the tube followed by a supersonic air flow.

Luckily, the air expands so quickly that its pressure and density become low.

So what happens when this wave of air hits the first pod?

Not exactly.

The external pressure that the pod experiences is still low compared to the pressure inside

the pod, which is atmospheric, so structurally the pod would be fine.

The real concern is the acceleration that the drag force causes.

The pods need to slow down quickly enough to prevent a collision, but not enough to

harm the passengers inside.

Using reasonable dimensions, the drag force comes in at about 30,000 lb.

This force would help the pods slow down.

The exact deceleration depends on the pod's mass.

A small pod with 6 people would decelerate with about 5 G's, whereas a large pod with

30 people would decelerate with about 1 G.

If the pods needed to decelerate at a higher or lower rate, the propulsion system could

make up the difference.

So in conclusion, it looks like safety won't be a deal breaker.

Thanks for watching, and I hope to see you next time on Tube Travel.

For more infomation >> Is the Hyperloop Safe from Terrorists? - Duration: 2:54.

-------------------------------------------

Les légumes des croquettes sans céréale pour chien sont TOXIQUES ! - Duration: 2:59.

For more infomation >> Les légumes des croquettes sans céréale pour chien sont TOXIQUES ! - Duration: 2:59.

-------------------------------------------

856 - Les Feldick Bible Study - Lesson 1 Part 4 Book 72 - Why we believe in the Pre-Trib Rapture 4 - Duration: 28:33.

For more infomation >> 856 - Les Feldick Bible Study - Lesson 1 Part 4 Book 72 - Why we believe in the Pre-Trib Rapture 4 - Duration: 28:33.

-------------------------------------------

Do not Ever Eat When Being Stomach If You Will not Be Inflamed - Duration: 12:02.

Do not Ever Eat When Being Stomach If You Will not Be Inflamed

No comments:

Post a Comment