Refutation of the book Pashawar Nights (introduction) 1st lesson 2nd session
In the name of Allah, all praise is for Allah alone and may peace and blessings be upon on Muhammad the final messenger
Dear brothers, I have already given an explanation at the beginning of our first session
In particular after the Iranian revolution
we see the beginnings of an exportation, push and drive of the Shia creed (aqeedah)
We have discussed in detail regarding that revolution
When that revolution occurred, almost everyone in the ummah including us
due to the anti imperialist, anti Zionist, anti American rhetoric
the perception of a political will within the ummah that was able to stand on its own feet independently etc.
and similar observations and analysis resulted in the revolution being supported
we certainly knew about our disputes and differences
but turned a blind eye and said now is not the time to discuss our disputes and differences
the ummah has more important international and strategic problems
therefore let's not bring these disputes and differences into the spotlight
let's support this revolution
besides, they started their revolution with rhetoric like this and it's still continuing
the unity of the ummah, the big satan is America, damn Zionism, we're going to erase Israel from history, this type of rhetoric is still continuing today
those who have been swayed and influenced by the revolution have been so because of this rhetoric
this rhetoric at that time was very strong and influential, it was a time when the ummah was at its weakest
therefore it was supported.
But the time that has passed since has shown that
the revolution which occurred was not an Islamic revolution, but rather a Shia revolution
they have added this fact into their constitution
all of their works and efforts are in that direction
in every aspect of their activities aimed for the Islamic world at large, this effort grabs our attention
there is no activity and effort to unify the ummah and bring it together, on the contrary
there is a huge effort to Shiify (convert people to the Shia creed) the ummah
a huge chunk of the government budget is spent on this effort to Shiify the ummah and this is still continuing today
Whether its via the media, whether it's learning and teaching propaganda techniques or via other methods, this is continuing
And within time, as their efforts and activities manifested themselves and came to fruition,
it has become clear without a doubt that this is a movement to Shiify the ummah
Never at any point in history has there ever been a Sunni government, society or scholar who planned and made efforts to convert Shiite's into Sunni's
But whenever the Shiite's were presented with an opportunity to convert the Sunnis into Shiites they have made it there top priority which we are clearly seeing today.
this dark propaganda has reached such a point where
the Sunnis have become suspicious of their own identity, sources, historical experiences, aqeedah (creed), as a matter of fact have become ruptured
and started becoming Shia-like
Just the other day a letter arrived from the South East of Turkey or somewhere around that region
written by one of our colleagues
there is a serious effort taking place there to Shiify the people
books are being translated
propagandists are going to Iran, Baghdad, Kum, Tehran,Najaf who are receiving specialized education
then they come back to Turkey and strive with vigor to convert the people into Shiite's
They have the backing of government funds
they have unlimited resources at their disposal
This isn't the case only in Turkey but is occurring in all parts of the Islamic world.
It's like this in Europe, the Balkans, Central Asia and everywhere else.
Wherever you go around the Islamic world, you are faced with two strong influences. One of these are the Shia and the other are the Salafi's
and the clash between these two has resulted in the majority of the ummah stuck between them being toasted
The ummah is being forced to choose between the two and end up either 'Shiified' or a Salafi
and these two are a power and influence which feed off one another
You run away from one only to get caught in the other or from the other only to get caught in the former
Right now this is what we are witnessing in the Islamic world
The Salafi's and ISIS have taken ownership of Sunni Islam
the center of Shia Islam is already obvious (Iran)
you're either that or this. For over 1,300 years, the overwhelming majority of the ummah
have been represented by the Ahlus Sunnah who are nowhere to be found within these two
Where has this mass gone?
Where have the sources/references, history....
values, evidences/claims of this mass? Where has it gone? It's evaporated.
We are passing through very interesting days
We truly are passing through times full of important lessons
our libraries are full of books
however, we are in horrific ignorance regarding our identity, creed (aqeedah) history and experiences
There are massive cavities inside our minds, thoughts and mentalities
and these large cavities are being filled by some others, resulting in the firm ground we stand on becoming unstable
It is here where this book faces us in a forceful and striking manner as an example of Shiite propaganda methods
Pashawar Nights
Let us be clear at the outset that this book is a fabrication and fitnah
namely, in Pashawar, the Sunni's and Shiite's gathering and debating with each other for nights on end
the Shiite's destroying the arguments of the Sunni's, their evidences, sources, silencing them and defeating them did not take place
this is a fabricated fictitious book, an imagined scenario and set up
They want us to believe that this actually happened
from the perspective of people who are not equipped to detect the 'spirit' and subject matter in the book
who don't have access to Arabic sources
are influenced and swayed into believing the events in the book took place
We will see some concrete examples of this as we come across them
For example, when they relate a narration
if that narration is found in Sunni sources
they'll provide the name, author, the volume, page, history of publication in all its detail and entirety
If the narration is in Shia sources but not in Sunni sources
they'll provide the full reference details of the Shia sources and in between squeeze the names of Sunni sources in fleet without it being fully referenced
Therefore, the reader believes that the narration is found in Kulayni's book Al-Kafi
as well as Bukhari, as well as Tabari because their names are referenced
We once had a discussion along these lines with a Jafari (a sixer Shiite)
He provided references from a book similar to Pashawar Nights which he brought and showed me
and what I just previously outlined is found there
At the top is the text of the narration, at the bottom can be found numerous references
Among the references are both Shia and Sunni sources
The Shia sources are referenced in its entirety whereas the Sunni sources only have the names provided
Now this Jafari says to me "ya sheikh, take a look, this narration is also found in Bukahri"
The narration mentions Umar r.anhu (allegedly) kicking in Fatima's r.anha door
then he enters and jams her up against the wall and she dropped her child "take a look, this is also found in a Sunni source" the Jafari says.
How are you going to prove this isn't a narration found in Sunni sources?
I tell him "this narration is not found in Bukhari, Tabari and other sources"
"Are you telling me the writer is lying about this?" he responds
Is the author lying? Couldn't he have thought or known that someone would come forward and say this is not in Bukhari and I will be shamed
"Couldn't he have predicted this brother?"
Now how am I going to prove this to you?
Either we are going to sit and read the translated version of Bukhari together from beginning to end
then you will see that this narration is not found in Bukhari
or you have to trust my word, otherwise there is no other way I can prove this to you
or you have to go and research it yourself and clarify whether it is there or not
Now this type of deception and covering the truth with falsehood has not been seen in history.
another method
the text of the narration found in the Sunni sources are not the same as those in Shiite sources
from time to time, the Salafi's also do this as well
We have the source in our hands
the narration in our hands is narrated differently
The incident is there, but narrated differently
The narration is found in Shiite sources but in a different manner
He relates the narration from his own (Shiite) sources
then references our Sunni sources as well implying the incident narrated is also found there
the incident really is there but the text of the narration is not the same
We will see examples of this as we come across them
For example, in Imam Abu Hanifa's book titled El Fikh'ul Absat, the following passage is found
it says "Whoever says Allah s.w.t has settled/established (istiwa) on the throne
but I don't know whether the throne is on the ground or heavens has become a kaafir
This has come down to us via the Hanafi scholars generation after generation with a sound isnaad and is a passage contained in the copies of El Fikh'ul Absat
Then there's the copy of El Fikh'ul Absat found in the hands of the Salafi's
This has come since Ismail al Harawi
in there, we see additions to Imam Abu Hanifah's statement, to this specific sentence
Allegedly Imam Abu Hanifa said it like this
"whoever says Allah s.w.t has settled/established on the on the throne (arsh) but I don't whether the throne is on the ground or or heavens has become a kaafir
because, he would have denied Allah s.w.t from being/existing in the heavens
Now this addition
is found in al Harawi's copy, Ibn Taymiyyah got it off him and it's also found in his writings
but the Hanafi's, from Abu Hanifah onward, as transmitted with their own chain of transmission is not to be found
So it's similar to this incident "go and look at Abu Hanifah's El-Fikhul Absat , did he say this or not? Yes he did say it, however
he didn't say it like this
These additions which you have added are not there.
As the time and place comes, we will see similar things take place here in (Pashawar Nights)
They make additions
then they say "go and look at your own sources as it's also there
A third method of theirs (Shiite's)
There are certain statements where the meaning isn't apparent but rather closed and hidden
by interpreting these
by interpreting (ta'weel) them to suit their own calculated agenda and mission
they create evidence to support their own claims and arguments
and when they support these with other evidences, this then
becomes evidence which leaves no room for suspicion or doubt in the readers mind.
A famous and well-known example of this is the narration of the pen and paper incident.
This is also found in our sources
When Rasulullah s.a.w was on his death bed
he said bring me something to write on and a pen, I'm going to write something for all of you so as not to go astray after me.
Umar r.a. intervened and said we have the book of Allah in our hands
we have no need for this
some of them said let's provide it and others said let's not provide it upon which Rasulullah s.a.w said
"this type of discussion/quarreling in the presence of a messenger in a setting like this is inappropriate, leave me alone" and the quarreling ended here.
A lot can be said about this narration and when it comes up which is mentioned in the book (Pashawar Nights) we will discuss it inshallah
But, what was Rasulullah s.a.w going to have written here?
of course the Shiite's say he was going to have written that Ali r.a. should be the khalifa/leader after him
when Umar r.anhu understood this, he prevented it from happening
even at the expense of going against the order of Rasulullah s.a.w, Umar r.anhu intervened and this matter concluded like this.
Now does the incident exist? Yes, it exists. Did it occur? Yes, it occurred.
However, how do they know what Rasulullah s.a.w was going to have written?
You say that he was going to appoint Ali r.a as the khalifah and was going to have that written. Then I will say no he was going to appoint Hz Abubakr r.a
How are we going to prove this?
Therefore, referencing various narrations like this where the meaning isn't apparent and clear
and supporting it with other so called evidences are attempts at obtaining evidence
another method of theirs
involves using narrations which are completely fabricated and concocted to support and provide evidence for their claims
this is where
the matter between the Sunni's and Shiite's are locked and why disputes and disagreements can't be solved.
The Shiites say you deny and don't accept so and so transmitters of narrations, you reject them and say these transmitters can't be trusted and are unreliable
whereas we say these transmitters are reliable and cannot be ignored who make up the bulk and foundation of our corpus relating to narrations/hadith
however important Bukhari is for you, Kulayni is for us
therefore, the fact that you find them untrustworthy doesn't apply to us, for you it's like that, for us it's like this
and finally, a different but very important, probably the most important of their propaganda methods for us
We fall into many errors regarding this point
They bring forth various narrations from our corpus of narration books, history books
these narrations are as they say
no tampering has taken place with the text
but there are problems with its chain of narration
without highlighting this, for example, they'll say so and so narration is found in Balazuri's Ansab al Ashraf or it's found in Tabari's history
it's found in Ibn Abi Shaybah's Musannaf
Abdurrazzak's Musannaf, look these are from your sources claim the Shiite's
This is where the youngsters in particular start slipping, they'll say "ya sheikh these narrations are from our sources, how are we supposed to respond to this?"
Now brothers this is where
for centuries, the abandoned and forgotten disciplines of jarh wa tadeel and critique of transmitters of narrations comes into play
This field of study and discipline, especially by those who specialize and are heavily involved with the study of hadith/traditions/narrations
must revive and bring these areas of study and discipline to the forefront
if this doesn't happen, then this matter will keep giving us plenty of headaches
you've probably heard, there's a jamaat here in Turkey
who some time ago said books on Islam don't contain fabricated hadith and narrations
they said this to exonerate and purify books on Islam but without realizing, they were also exonerating fabricated hadith as well
No, any book on Islam, related to narrations/hadith
as long as they have come down to us with a chain of narrators
nullifies and negates our concern regarding who the author of the book is
instead, what concerns us is the soundness and reliability of the narration/hadith itself
brothers this is the case for Bukhari, for Kutub i sitte
all other books of hadith
including history and books on tabaqat
There is a widely held general view in society
they'll say Bukhari and Muslim don't contain any weak hadith
Now don't be surprised if particular Salafi's or Shiite's edit out all I've said previously and start this seminar from this point forward
No brothers, there are hadeeth in Bukhari and Muslim which have been deliberated on (found weak)
but these narrations are firstly, not fabricated, secondly, they do not constitute the foundation of the book in relation to its methodology (usool)
these books contain two types of hadith
all hadith books are like this, they contain two types of hadith
this can especially be seen from scholars of hadith who have set out to collect and write saheeh hadith
1. The narrations/hadith which form the methodological foundation of the book
Imam Bukhari let's say in Kitabut Tawheed Kitaabul Iman, Kitaabus Salah, Kitaabul Fazail
will narrate various hadith
these hadith will form the basis and foundation for that specific chapter and topic
he'll also narrate various hadith with the intention to
support and reinforce those foundational hadith
we call these hadith types Shawahid (witnesses)
So there are hadith which form the methodological foundation and there are hadith classified as Shawahid
All of the hadith which form the methodological foundation are saheeh and none of them are weak but among the Shawahid there are a few weak hadith
2.
Regarding hadith related to the virtue of actions, the general attitude and approach of the Ahlus Sunnah scholars of hadith have not been extremely stringent
Unlike hadith which pertain to laws and aqeedah, they have been a bit more tolerant and lax towards these hadith
and have not been as critical in relation to its Jarh tadeel and kept the boundaries a bit more wider
on account of this, narrations about the virtues of actions and chapters on Targhib wa at-Tarhib
don't possess a level of soundness like the hadith which form the methodological foundations
In these areas we would run into weak hadith
In this context, within Sahih Bukhari, we are able to see weak hadith regarding the virtues of actions and good deeds
They are also found in Sahih Muslim too
Therefore when we say there aren't any weak hadith in Bukhari and Muslim, we are referring to the hadith which form the methodological foundation
We are referring to the hadith which form the main pillars of the book, otherwise, besides these hadith, it is possible to find weak hadith although they themselves are not extremely weak
if this is the case with Bukhari and Muslim, then it is considerably more so with other hadith books
In other hadith books, more weak hadiths can be found
In Imam Malik's Muwatta, there are 30 or so balaghat types of hadith
Imam Malik narrated it with the wording "balagha ni" without providing a chain of transmission
"according to the way it has reached me, Rasulullah s.a.w. said..." said Imam Malik
"or so and so sahaba did so and so" said Imam Malik
we call these Balaghat and there are 30 or so of them
if I remember correctly, there are approximately 37 of them
These balaghat types of hadith, later on by scholars of hadith
researched them
besides four of them, they found mawsool or muttasil (uninterrupted, unbroken) chains of transmission for all of them
Imam Malik said balaghani, but other scholars found and narrated that hadith with its full chain of transmission
therefore, they said these hadith are not weak
but they couldn't find a sound chain of transmission for four of them
so weak hadith can be found in the Muwatta as well
Then what are these hadith in relation to? Like we said before, these hadith do not impact the methodological foundational hadith and main purpose of the book
when we explain the matter and look at it from this perspective
yes, it's possible to find weak hadith in ibn Abi Shayba, Tabari, Abdurrazzak, Abu Dawood, Tirmidhi, Nasai, ibn Majah. These do exist.
Therefore, when they bring a narration like this and stick it in our face
we need to be sufficient and able to determine its soundness and critique its chain of narrators
and when we are unable to do this, it is precisely here where the youngsters slip and get caught up thinking and believing
"well because this narration is found in my Sunni sources, this means the Shiite's are right in this matter"
so Umar r.anhu actually did threaten Fatima r.anha
When Abubakr r.anhu became the kahlifa
Ali and Zubair r.anhuma
were consulting with Fatima r.anha and going in and out consulting with her but they weren't declaring their allegiance (biat) to Abu Bakr r.a
Umar r.a. goes to Fatima r.anha and says
"your dad in my eyes is the highest ranked out of all the people"
after him, you are ranked the highest of people in my eyes
but do you see those two, Ali and Zubair
they are constantly going in and out seeing you
and withholding from allying themselves with Abubakr r.anhu
I swear to Allah
I have given the order to my men, if they continue coming in and out consulting with you, I'm going to have this house burnt to the ground, be warned.
On account of this, our mother Fatima tells Ali and Zubair r.anhuma to not see her, so they stop going and immediately go and declare their allegiance to Abu Bakr. This narration is found in our sources.
Just because this is the case, are we going to say that the Shia are right?
we're not going to fall into this trap
In order to not fall in this trap, we need to revive the discipline of jarh wa tadeel and bring it to the forefront of the ummah
What is the soundness of these narrations in relation to its chain of transmission?
this must be stringently critiqued and analysed in a detailed manner
then put it out there. If it's the truth it's the truth, if not then it's not.
But till now
with regards to hadith like this, after detailed investigations, I didn't come across a single hadith which had a chain of transmission which was sound
Every single one was problematic in relation to the soundness of its chain of transmission.
The fact that this narration is found in this source or that source in so and so's Sunni scholar's book is not sufficient to solve the matter
the soundness must be proved
Therefore these 5 propaganda methods
which the Shia adopt within the context of narrations in order to confuse the Sunni's
will come across us in this book (Pashawar Nights)
The narrations which we will face are either mujmal (meaning isn't apparent or clear) which they interpret (ta'weel) to suit themselves
either it isn't found in our sources but they say it is
either it is found in our sources but has come via different ways
either it's different in our sources and different in their sources
or its found in our sources but the chain of transmission is problematic
all of these methods
their deception and ploys can only be exposed by investigating, analysing, and in particular, critiquing the chains of transmission
Inshallah this is what we will attempt to do here
Let me add one more thing
under the guise of not disrupting the unity of the ummah
at this moment there are more important issues on hand
don't stir madhap fanaticism and other similar sentiments
various unwary people do not want these realities to be exposed and prefer we turn a blind eye to all of this
They say things like "aren't there other matters to deal with, why are you occupying yourself with the Shia.
We don't have neither the right nor the authority to show tolerance in this matter
The issue is directly related to creed (aqeedah)
without solving this
believing in the possibility of a strategic partnership
working together, brotherhood and unity will result in serious heedlessness and unwariness
this won't be achievable, historical experience shows this
and by sacrificing a principle and pillar of eeman and aqeedah, you will not reach the truth
We can never succeed in this world and the hereafter by sacrificing and turning a blind eye to a pillar of our aqeedah
This is a deen
This is a deen, not an ideology
Writers with ideological leanings in the past
have said times have changed, let's change this point and do it like this, change that point and do it like that, deen is not something like this
Our deen has its rigid and fixed pillars
if you believe and submit to those pillars, you'll become a Muslim
but if you say no I have issue with these pillars and try to bargain, then this isn't called being a Muslim but it's called something else
Therefore, in the name of the unity of the ummah and other similar sentiments, we have no right nor authority to sacrifice various concrete truths
By sacrificing these, we cannot get anywhere and we will not gain any blessing nor grace.
The moment you categorise these under the list of irrelevant, then that
brings to the forefront what we call an identity crisis
500-600 years ago, Iran was a Sunni dominant geography
Yes, Sunni Islam was dominant there
However, within history, whatever happened happened and that region was transformed into a Shia dominant region
How did this happen? It happened just like this
we said "ohh it's ok, no problem, no harm done, there are more imporant matters now, let's not delve into these matters". This is how it happened
It will continue happening this way from now on
30 years ago in Turkey
yes, in the East of Turkey, there are Jafari's in Kars, Igdir etc. in that region there are Jafari's
Allah knows best but they formed approximately 3-5% of the entire population of Turkey
But now, wherever you go within this Sunni region, we are faced with them like thorns
what's happening?
a Sunni society is becoming Shia-like
We are experiencing a loss of identity
and this is how it happens
When we're unable to properly and wisely list the points of relevance and importance
changes start taking place within the identity of society, there are changes and transformations that take place in the 'spirit' of that society
You might say "so what, what's going to happen?"
As long as the society is Muslim, why should it matter whether they are Sunni's or Shiite's?
you might debate this and discuss what's wrong with this? what will happen?
Brothers maybe we might construct our world and nothing might happen
By becoming Shiite's and allowing ourselves to come under the influence of Iran and Iraq in our region
maybe we could construct a better world, a more comfortable life. It's possible for us to think this.
But what's going to happen in the hereafter?
Though there are tens of verses in the Quran where the sahaba/companions have been bestowed with honor, do you think we will be able to gain the approval of Allah by swearing and slandering them?
though the Quran has exonerated our mother Aisha r.anha from wrong doing, is it possible to look at Rasulullah's s.a.w. face by slandering and defaming her?
Judgment exists in the hereafter
there are rigid truths
if our eyes slip and looks a second time, we are going to give account and be judged about it, this is a weakness and sin related to actions and deeds
do you think you will not be judged according to defects found in your aqeedah?
Do you think judgement is lighter in matters of aqeedah as opposed to actions?
no, it's not like that
The judgement of your aqeedah is tougher than your actions.
Allah says I am pleased with them and they are pleased with Me about the sahaba
and we are going to say most of them became faasik's (sinners), as a matter of fact, go a little further and say they became kaafir's
Allah says He's pleased with them, but we are going to say they became kaafir's
Where can we go with this in akhira? What can we hold on to?
Therefore the matter in front of us is a problem which cannot be neglected both from a worldly and hereafter perspective
This is the main reason why we have brought this matter to the forefront.
I've already mentioned it in the first session, unfortunately in this country,
when I ask for an explanation of who the Shiite's are, what is there history, what are their sources, what's their methodology, what's their branches, what madhap's do they have.
In order to explain and teach these matters
if we leave exceptions aside, we don't have anybody, nor an institution who can satisfactorily put forth an explanation in in all its detail and entirety
But in contrast to this, in Iran
they have developed institutions whose sole aim is dedicated to researching, studying and analysing our Sunni sources
In other words that is their job, they sit down with our Sunni sources...
these are institutions I'm talking about, they aren't the efforts of certain individuals
there are institutions solely created for this purpose
they sit from morning to night
they are analyzing our sources
word by word, sentence by sentence, page by page they are analyzing
From there they bring out ammunition and arms for themselves
then use it against the ummah like this book (Pashawar Nights)
There are institutions solely created for this purpose. In Iran there is a hadith university.
Hadith university
In Turkey
because the sciences of hadith
has severely been neglected and is still continuing to be neglected, we don't know what this is and what's going on
in Saudi Arabia they have Orientalist institutes
to research this, they have set up special institutions
You won't be able to find a single institution like this in Turkey
You won't find a single institution which researches the Shiites. At most there would've been one or two symposiums and that's about it
However these Shiites are a reality right next to our doorstep
We need to get to know them
Right at this moment, our politics is concerned with them
they are the unseen topic occupying our current affairs
however we don't have the intention to equip ourselves to deal with this matter. We don't have this concern.
Because of this, a few seminars which we will provide here will not sufficiently close the cavities in relation to this. Ours is simply a small effort in this regard
at the very least, for the sake of our responsibilities
when we are judged in the hereafter
for the sake of having something to say in the hereafter
it is something we will strive to do
When we do this
like I said, madhap fanaticism, causing division and chaos within the ummah absolutely are not part of our intentions
Quite simply there is an allegation against us and this allegation needs to be answered.
Just as the people who throw these allegations aren't viewed as causing madhap fanaticism
we expect to be seen in the same light
However much they are seen as defending the unity of the ummah, we too must be seen as the same.
A second point
when we do this refutation
we are not going to insult, swear, throw accusations, speak baseless without referencing what we say
everything we say by the permission of Allah will be referenced
we are speaking with the knowledge that all of this is being recorded
someday if someone throws an opposing claim to what we say, with Allah's permission, we will be ready to answer them back
As mentioned in the first session, this book is a fabrication/concoction
it is based on fiction
this debate never occurred
it has been depicted as if it has occurred, we will accept this as if it did occur
we are going to accept it did happen, we are not going to go into detail and question whether it happened or not
and what concerns us will be the allegations/claims made in the book
One last thing I would like to say
we don't carry the intention of trying to convert the Shiite's into Sunni's
I don't want to be thought of as someone who started this path with this intention
We only have one purpose
there are a number of claims/allegations against Sunnis, we will answer them by the permission Allah
Otherwise," they slandered the Shiite's, they did so and so to the Ahlu Bayt" because these types of accusations will come within time
We never have concerned ourselves with these types of slanders and will not concern ourselves from now on either
I felt the need to highlight our intention here one more time
And one more final point brothers
we the ahlu sunnah within our history have never had any problems or issues with the ahlu bayt.
We never displayed any lack of respect to the ahlu bayt and we never tolerated those who did.
The ahlu bayt is one thing
Shia is something else
Under the guise of supporting the ahlu bayt, loving them and upholding their rights, the things that are being done in their name have nothing to do with the ahlu bayt themselves.
Therefore, this refutation will not equate to refuting or rejecting the ahlu bayt
Our attitude towards the ahlu bayt just like throughout our Ahlus Sunnah history will be of utmost respect
We reject the claim made by the Shia that they are defending the ahlu bayt
they are acting in the name of the ahlu bayt, yes but we say they aren't defending the ahlu bayt but rather, exploiting them
Because they legitimise themselves by exploiting the ahlu bayt, that is why they rave on about the ahlu bayt, otherwise there is no relation between the Shia and the ahlu bayt.
I'm not sure if any of you have read the Rihla monthly journal regarding the Shiite's but we also attempted to bring this forth there as well
The Ahlu Bayt imam's themselves were fed up from this group.
The ahlu bayt imam's themselves distanced and abandoned themselves from this group. This is something interesting like this
Take it from Husein r.a. up to his son Zaynal Abidin, from his son Muhammed Bakir to his son Imam Jafar
from all of them, directly from Shia sources, they have said "we have had enough we have had enough of these people (Shia)
therefore, where is defending the rights of the ahlu bayt?
where is the imaamiyah twelver madhap?
this is a propaganda technique, this is a means to legitimise themselves
within history, the ahlu sunnah oppressed the ahlu bayt
the Shiite's are defending the rights of the ahlu bayt and protecting their legacy
this is what is being depicted
but this depiction has no reality
It could be said
"well if you don't have any issues with the ahlu bayt then why doesn't your sources contain many narrations from the ahlu bayt?"
The reason for this is obvious
we are unable to guarantee and determine whether the narrations attributed to the imam's of the ahlu bayt are actually from them or not
This is why within our sources, our scholars have acted very stringently in this matter
Critiquing and analyzing a narration has necessarily been applied here as well
When a narration is attributed to Husein, Hasan, Ali Zeynel Abidin, Muhammed Bakir, Imam Jafar may Allah be pleased with all of them
we will not hold the narration in high sanctity and reverence. We will rather look at the soundness in its chain of transmission
We will look at the transmitters and pass judgement based on that
For a Shiite, these transmitters might be held in high esteem but for us they might not
because we apply our own criteria here, every narration attributed to the imams of the ahlu bayt are not accepted and this is quite natural
Otherwise we don't have any issues with the ahlu bayt
In reality, the term ahlu bayt as I have tried to elucidate in that writing in the Rihla journal
the term ahlu bayt specifically being attributed and limited to the lineage starting with Ali and his Son Husein and continuing via this path
though it's not like this based on the book, nor is it a principle, the fact that it's like this in actuality should not confuse us, the term ahlu bayt has a much wider meaning
Especially if we look at the use of the term in the Quran, it also encapsulates the pure clean wives of Rasulullah s.a.w
The righeous and clean wives of Rasulullah s.a.w who are the mothers of this ummah are from the ahlu bayt
we are not therefore going to be unwary and leave this term at the mercy and exploitation of the Shiite's
If only we had the time and resources
we could have started from the formation of the Shia, looking at the causes which brought them into existence, the beginning of their history and come down chronologically to these days analyzing every facet
so that we can acquaint ourselves with this Shiite matter which is extremely important
but it seems we are not going to have time for this here
For more infomation >> MARTESTRECE (El Onírico) - PIEL SERPIENTE 👽 - Duration: 2:15. 
For more infomation >> Wanda Nara e Mauro Icardi sempre sotto tiro, spunta una foto che fa discutere | M.C.G.S - Duration: 3:44. 
For more infomation >> 山口組に影響をもたらす五社会の行方 - ニュース24x7 - Duration: 4:55. 
For more infomation >> Uomini e donne, la scelta di Nicolò e il clamoroso rifiuto in studio | Wind Zuiden - Duration: 3:31. 
For more infomation >> Uomini e donne,ecco chi è Stefano il nuovo tronista | Wind Zuiden - Duration: 3:26. 
For more infomation >> Seat Ateca 1.4 EcoTSI 150pk Style + Upgr. Prof. 1 + trekhaak - Duration: 0:59. 
For more infomation >> [스파이샷] 현대차 신형 i20…신규 캐스캐이딩 그릴 탑재[dailycar kr love] - Duration: 1:34. 
For more infomation >> 포르쉐, 2017년 사상 최대 판매 기록 경신 "올해 주인공은 카이엔"[dailycar kr love] - Duration: 3:30. 
For more infomation >> 지프 그랜드 체로키 스페셜 에디션 출시…20대 한정 판매[dailycar kr love] - Duration: 2:09. 
For more infomation >> 홈 모터쇼 [디트로이트] BMW, 뉴 X2·신형 i8 공개…국내 출시는?[dailycar kr love] - Duration: 3:15. 
For more infomation >> 도요타, 프리우스C 사전계약…가장 합리적인 '2000만원대' 프리우스[dailycar kr love] - Duration: 1:33. 
For more infomation >> 기아차 니로 EV, 주행거리 따라 '2가지 버전'으로 나온다…예상 가격은?[dailycar kr love] - Duration: 3:11. 
For more infomation >> 만트럭버스, TGX 스페셜 에디션 2종 출시[dailycar kr love] - Duration: 1:26. 
For more infomation >> 메르세데스-벤츠 한성자동차, 1월 특별 이벤트 진행[ 자동차 세계 24_7] - Duration: 2:49. 
For more infomation >> BMW, 액티브투어러·그란투어러 공개…오는 3월 세계 출시[ 자동차 세계 24_7] - Duration: 2:12. 
For more infomation >> 홈 시승기·리뷰 수입차 시승기 [시승기] 인피니티 Q50S 블루 스포츠…"청량한 친환경 스포츠 세단"[ 자동차 세계 24_7] - Duration: 6:22. 
For more infomation >> Racing Sports Network
For more infomation >> Lauren Scala (02 26 2018) - Duration: 2:52. 
For more infomation >> Interview with ISSAA at StarSeries i-League Season 4 [+RU Subs] - Duration: 11:23. 
For more infomation >> Παρουσίαση βιβλίου για τους Άταφους Ήρωες του 1940-1941 - Duration: 1:00. 
For more infomation >> I'm changing to Lithium Batteries, What Type and Why - 38 - Duration: 26:26. 
For more infomation >> SuperDonuts - GAMEPLAY CS:GO + DES KIKOO ONT... - Duration: 7:12. 
For more infomation >> Revendre sa voiture plus chère qu'à l'achat - Duration: 2:00. 
For more infomation >> Comment David Hallyday et Sylvie Vartan ont appris la mort de Johnny Hallyday - Duration: 2:44. 
For more infomation >> 平昌閉会式、K-POPスター登場も「誰？」 東京五輪に向けて「嫌な予感」 - Duration: 2:08. 
For more infomation >> Kate Middleton enceinte d'une fille ? La forme de son ventre serait un indice - Duration: 2:49. 
For more infomation >> Les Marseillais Australia : Trois bonnes raisons de ne pas louper le programme - Duration: 3:15. 
For more infomation >> Voici ce qui s'est passé le jour où j'ai recruté un coach pour pimenter ma vie sexuelle - Duration: 5:18. 
For more infomation >> 羅志祥問黃子韜「你有多久沒那個了」，在旁邊的易烊千璽裝聽不懂 - Duration: 1:32. 
For more infomation >> 하늘나라로 떠난 팬이 준 선물 아직도 간직하며 소중히 쓰고 있는 연예인 - Duration: 5:06. 
For more infomation >> 김나니 프로필 남편 정석순 나이차이 - Duration: 2:47. 
For more infomation >> "BTS 꼭 보고 싶었는데"..평창의 아쉬움 - Duration: 7:34. 
For more infomation >> 84세 이순재 선생님을 펑펑 울린 12살 꼬마의 미친 '눈물' 연기 (영상) - Duration: 4:20. 
For more infomation >> 완벽 비주얼 뽐내는 '키 187cm' 8등신 무쌍 미남 장기용 일상사진 23장 - Duration: 3:29. 
For more infomation >> 오는 3월 16일 첫방송 되는 '하트시그널 시즌2' 예고편 최초 공개 - Duration: 2:59. 
For more infomation >> 백업댄서 결혼식에 등장해 '무반주 축가' 불러준 '특급 의리녀' 아이유 (영상) - Duration: 3:05. 
For more infomation >> 윤여정 조영남✧나이 담배 영어 삭발 살펴볼까요? - Duration: 4:23. 
For more infomation >> 개그맨 김현철 딸 아내(부인) 직업 나이차이 - Duration: 2:37. 
For more infomation >> Dank Kanyes Xmas-Geschenk: Kim K. jetzt noch reicher! - Duration: 2:03. 
No comments:
Post a Comment