Youtube daily report Oct 27 2017

Health care science is advancing and improving, but with this comes change, especially with breast cancer.

The female breast, not counting the skin cover, is made mostly of milk-making lobules,

milk-carrying ducts, fat, connective tissue, blood vessels, and lymph nodes.

The most common cancers start in the milk-carrying ducts,

but cancer can start in any of the other types of tissue.

Our best science suggests that a woman who is born this year

will have a one in eight lifetime chance of developing breast cancer.

That's up from one in ten a decade ago. That's a change.

Risk factors for breast cancer include increased age of the individual,

inherited genetic alterations (BRCA 1 and 2), high breast density on mammograms,

a family history of breast cancer after 50-years-of-age, and a Caucasian ancestry.

Also, risk is higher if there is a prior personal history of breast cancer,

previous radiation treatment to the chest area, prior long history of excessive alcohol intake,

menstruation before 12 or after 55-years-of-age, no babies, or babies after 30-years-of-age,

menopausal therapy with estrogen, and minimal physical activity in a lifetime.

These are new and refined factors that indicate who has a higher risk of breast cancer.

Despite these considerations, a woman, without even one risk factor, can still get breast cancer.

Screening tests for breast cancer include history taking, physical exam, imaging, and genetic testing.

Epidemiologists have found that not all breast cancer screening tests are helpful,

however, and some can cause problems for the patient.

Therefore, recommendations for breast cancer screening have changed.

When a mammogram is false-positive, suggesting there MIGHT BE cancer when it's NOT there,

this could cause undue stress, anxiety, and an unnecessary biopsy.

When a mammogram is false-negative, suggesting there is NO cancer when it IS there,

this could cause delay of treatment resulting in a greater chance for the cancer to spread.

When a mammogram finds low-grade cancer that would never be life-threatening,

this could cause unnecessary treatment and surgery that might worsen the patient's quality of life.

For these reasons, recommendations for screening must be individualized.

This confusing and changing information should help all of us realize that,

in this arena of health care, there are too many variables.

Please discuss this with your doctor or care provider as it is her or his job to help you sort this out.

Screening tests for breast cancer need to be tailored for every individual. With advancing science, comes change.

For more infomation >> Changing Breast Cancer Advice | By Richard P. Holm, MD - Duration: 3:12.

-------------------------------------------

Renault Mégane 1.5 dCi Bose (Trekhaak/P.Glass/NAV.) - Duration: 1:01.

For more infomation >> Renault Mégane 1.5 dCi Bose (Trekhaak/P.Glass/NAV.) - Duration: 1:01.

-------------------------------------------

YouTube TV Now Available

For more infomation >> YouTube TV Now Available

-------------------------------------------

How the Krack Hack Breaks Wi-Fi Security - Duration: 6:26.

SciShow is supported by Brilliant.org.

[INTRO ♪]

We've come to rely pretty heavily on Wi-Fi.

We've got our phones, computers, and watches hooked into our personal networks,

not to mention all those Internet of Things gadgets,

like smart refrigerators and network-enabled juice presses.

Which is why the giant flaming hole in Wi-Fi security announced last week

is kind of a huge deal.

The vulnerability, discovered by Belgian security researcher Mathy Vanhoef,

could let hackers do things like steal credit card numbers

or inject malware basically anywhere there's Wi-Fi.

And it went overlooked for 14 years.

In practice, the effects might not be that bad,

but experts were still taken by surprise.

The security protocol that encrypts pretty much all Wi-Fi networks is called WPA2,

short for Wi-Fi Protected Access … two.

It's been around since 2004, and it was mathematically proven to be safe

and to not give up passwords or encryption keys.

Which … it doesn't.

But the new vulnerability, known as Krack,

gives hackers a potential workaround.

Krack, short for Key Reinstallation AttaCK,

exploits a process that's an important part of WPA2 security:

what's known as the four-way handshake.

The handshake is a series of messages exchanged between a client device,

like your phone, and an access point, like your router,

when they're establishing a secure connection.

The first two steps of the four-way handshake involve

the client and access point each making sure they have the right password.

In the third message, the access point sends some additional information,

and the fourth message is the client saying, "OK, we're good to go."

Over the course of this exchange, the access point and the client

agree on an encryption key,

which both of them install after the fourth message.

That key, along with a special number associated with

the amount of data that's been sent through the connection so far,

is used to encrypt each chunk of data, or packet.

It's kind of like a cereal box decoder ring that lets you

have the rest of the conversation in code.

That conversation is all of the data you're sending and receiving on the internet,

including your credit card number if you feel like finally

splurging on that new video game.

And Wi-Fi is beamed into the air where anyone in range can intercept it.

As long as it's encrypted, nobody can snoop on

the information you're sending even if they intercept the message.

Without knowing the code, it's just gibberish.

The Krack exploit lets hackers figure out the code

by targeting the third message in the handshake.

That message can sometimes drop out because of routine blips in the connection,

so if the access point doesn't get the fourth "OK, it's all good" message

from the client, it sends the third message again,

like "Hey!

I don't think you got that!

Let me repeat it."

In his paper, Vanhoef found that if a hacker blocks that fourth "got it" message

from getting to the access point, causing it to send the third message again,

they can force a device to reinstall the encryption key,

which also resets that special number.

And that's bad.

It means you'll end up using the same encryption key and the same number—

and therefore, the exact same code—over and over again.

And repetition is how codes are broken.

With all those data packets encrypted with the exact same code,

hackers can look for patterns that give away what the code is.

It becomes way simpler to decrypt the data they're intercepting.

They could do a handful of things with this exploit,

depending on the specific type of connection.

In some cases, they could theoretically send data, too,

infecting the device with malware or ransomware.

Now, this is a massive vulnerability, and there's reason to take precautions.

But there's also reason not to panic, because it's not the end of Wi-Fi as we know it.

The bad news first: since WPA2 is supposed to be so safe,

it's used to secure basically all Wi-Fi networks.

All of the Wi-Fi.

All of it.

So if you're saying to yourself, "I wonder if my Wi-Fi enabled toaster is affected,"

yes.

Yes it is.

Because it's hooked into your home Wi-Fi network.

Hide your kids.

Hide your Wi-Fi.

Connecting to sites via https instead of http adds some extra security,

because the https in the URL means the site is encrypted—

this time between the website's server and your browser,

somewhere totally different than your computer and the access point.

But, depending on the data packets hackers manage to intercept and decrypt,

there's still a lot of information they could steal.

They could also inject harmful software into sites that don't use https—

a favorite tactic they normally abuse over Wi-Fi networks that aren't secure,

like in coffee shops.

The good news is that tech companies already know about Krack

and are working on fixes for it.

But it'll take time to patch everything.

They're already starting to push updates to phones and other devices.

But your Wi-Fi router might need more time—

not to mention your smart toaster.

And ideally, both your devices and your router should be patched.

So you should definitely make sure to install any updates that come in for your devices.

Even your smart hairbrush.

Is there a smart hairbrush?

I don't believe it.

Another piece of good news is that a hacker would have to

physically access the Wi-Fi network to pull off a Krack attack.

They couldn't do it remotely.

So unless you see someone in a sketchy van

camping out across the street from your house,

your personal network is probably fine.

It's a little easier to hang out near a business without anyone noticing, though,

which is why this isn't a risk to totally dismiss.

Vanhoef didn't find evidence that people have actually

been carrying out Krack-based attacks, but the risk in publishing it

is that the bad guys find out too.

Speaking of bad guys:

right up there with hackers are chronically dishonest people, aka liars.

Brilliant.org has a quiz about truthtellers and liars,

and you need to use logic to figure out who's who.

You need to know that I know that she knows ... I don't know!

What I do know is that I've always liked riddles like this,

and this is supposed to be a challenging one, so let's go check it out!

So we're looking at Brilliant's Multi-Level Thinking course,

which is one of those things that you kinda hope you're really good at, but, uh, we'll see.

So here we have Alice, who says Bob is lying.

But then Bob says, "Neither of us is lying."

So now I have to figure out who's actually lying.

Alice is calling Bob a liar, but Bob is saying neither of us is a liar.

So if Bob was telling the truth, then Alice would also be telling the truth,

But Alice is saying that Bob is lying, so Alice must be telling the truth!

So even though this is kinda set up as a quiz, it doesn't really feel like I'm taking a quiz.

It's just kinda fun and it kinda sets you up to think about the next problem in the right way,

so that you can progress through the lesson.

Thanks for joining me, checking out Brilliant's Multi-Level Thinking course.

I'm really looking forward to going through their Computer Science one later

and I think you might enjoy checking them out too, so go to Brilliant.org/SciShow and you can sign up for free

and try them out. The first 200 people who sign up there will get 20% off their annual subscription.

[OUTRO ♪]

For more infomation >> How the Krack Hack Breaks Wi-Fi Security - Duration: 6:26.

-------------------------------------------

Amazon Cloud Cam Indoor Security Camera With Alexa - AmazingGadgets - Duration: 2:17.

Pre-Order Click Here: http://amzn.to/2yT4lfv

For more infomation >> Amazon Cloud Cam Indoor Security Camera With Alexa - AmazingGadgets - Duration: 2:17.

-------------------------------------------

Mercedes-Benz A-Klasse A 180 d Urban Ambition- LESAUTO- DUBBELE BEDIENING - Duration: 0:42.

For more infomation >> Mercedes-Benz A-Klasse A 180 d Urban Ambition- LESAUTO- DUBBELE BEDIENING - Duration: 0:42.

-------------------------------------------

Respuesta contundente de Rajoy:cese de Puigdemont y elecciones catalanas el 21-D - Duration: 5:49.

For more infomation >> Respuesta contundente de Rajoy:cese de Puigdemont y elecciones catalanas el 21-D - Duration: 5:49.

-------------------------------------------

Kyron - Carnival (G-String Riddim) "2018 Soca" (Trinidad) - Duration: 3:13.

Kyron - Carnival (G-String Riddim) "2018 Soca" (Trinidad)

For more infomation >> Kyron - Carnival (G-String Riddim) "2018 Soca" (Trinidad) - Duration: 3:13.

-------------------------------------------

Home Automation Turns Any Home into a Smart Home - Duration: 1:07.

For more infomation >> Home Automation Turns Any Home into a Smart Home - Duration: 1:07.

-------------------------------------------

How the Krack Hack Breaks Wi-Fi Security - Duration: 6:26.

SciShow is supported by Brilliant.org.

[INTRO ♪]

We've come to rely pretty heavily on Wi-Fi.

We've got our phones, computers, and watches hooked into our personal networks,

not to mention all those Internet of Things gadgets,

like smart refrigerators and network-enabled juice presses.

Which is why the giant flaming hole in Wi-Fi security announced last week

is kind of a huge deal.

The vulnerability, discovered by Belgian security researcher Mathy Vanhoef,

could let hackers do things like steal credit card numbers

or inject malware basically anywhere there's Wi-Fi.

And it went overlooked for 14 years.

In practice, the effects might not be that bad,

but experts were still taken by surprise.

The security protocol that encrypts pretty much all Wi-Fi networks is called WPA2,

short for Wi-Fi Protected Access … two.

It's been around since 2004, and it was mathematically proven to be safe

and to not give up passwords or encryption keys.

Which … it doesn't.

But the new vulnerability, known as Krack,

gives hackers a potential workaround.

Krack, short for Key Reinstallation AttaCK,

exploits a process that's an important part of WPA2 security:

what's known as the four-way handshake.

The handshake is a series of messages exchanged between a client device,

like your phone, and an access point, like your router,

when they're establishing a secure connection.

The first two steps of the four-way handshake involve

the client and access point each making sure they have the right password.

In the third message, the access point sends some additional information,

and the fourth message is the client saying, "OK, we're good to go."

Over the course of this exchange, the access point and the client

agree on an encryption key,

which both of them install after the fourth message.

That key, along with a special number associated with

the amount of data that's been sent through the connection so far,

is used to encrypt each chunk of data, or packet.

It's kind of like a cereal box decoder ring that lets you

have the rest of the conversation in code.

That conversation is all of the data you're sending and receiving on the internet,

including your credit card number if you feel like finally

splurging on that new video game.

And Wi-Fi is beamed into the air where anyone in range can intercept it.

As long as it's encrypted, nobody can snoop on

the information you're sending even if they intercept the message.

Without knowing the code, it's just gibberish.

The Krack exploit lets hackers figure out the code

by targeting the third message in the handshake.

That message can sometimes drop out because of routine blips in the connection,

so if the access point doesn't get the fourth "OK, it's all good" message

from the client, it sends the third message again,

like "Hey!

I don't think you got that!

Let me repeat it."

In his paper, Vanhoef found that if a hacker blocks that fourth "got it" message

from getting to the access point, causing it to send the third message again,

they can force a device to reinstall the encryption key,

which also resets that special number.

And that's bad.

It means you'll end up using the same encryption key and the same number—

and therefore, the exact same code—over and over again.

And repetition is how codes are broken.

With all those data packets encrypted with the exact same code,

hackers can look for patterns that give away what the code is.

It becomes way simpler to decrypt the data they're intercepting.

They could do a handful of things with this exploit,

depending on the specific type of connection.

In some cases, they could theoretically send data, too,

infecting the device with malware or ransomware.

Now, this is a massive vulnerability, and there's reason to take precautions.

But there's also reason not to panic, because it's not the end of Wi-Fi as we know it.

The bad news first: since WPA2 is supposed to be so safe,

it's used to secure basically all Wi-Fi networks.

All of the Wi-Fi.

All of it.

So if you're saying to yourself, "I wonder if my Wi-Fi enabled toaster is affected,"

yes.

Yes it is.

Because it's hooked into your home Wi-Fi network.

Hide your kids.

Hide your Wi-Fi.

Connecting to sites via https instead of http adds some extra security,

because the https in the URL means the site is encrypted—

this time between the website's server and your browser,

somewhere totally different than your computer and the access point.

But, depending on the data packets hackers manage to intercept and decrypt,

there's still a lot of information they could steal.

They could also inject harmful software into sites that don't use https—

a favorite tactic they normally abuse over Wi-Fi networks that aren't secure,

like in coffee shops.

The good news is that tech companies already know about Krack

and are working on fixes for it.

But it'll take time to patch everything.

They're already starting to push updates to phones and other devices.

But your Wi-Fi router might need more time—

not to mention your smart toaster.

And ideally, both your devices and your router should be patched.

So you should definitely make sure to install any updates that come in for your devices.

Even your smart hairbrush.

Is there a smart hairbrush?

I don't believe it.

Another piece of good news is that a hacker would have to

physically access the Wi-Fi network to pull off a Krack attack.

They couldn't do it remotely.

So unless you see someone in a sketchy van

camping out across the street from your house,

your personal network is probably fine.

It's a little easier to hang out near a business without anyone noticing, though,

which is why this isn't a risk to totally dismiss.

Vanhoef didn't find evidence that people have actually

been carrying out Krack-based attacks, but the risk in publishing it

is that the bad guys find out too.

Speaking of bad guys:

right up there with hackers are chronically dishonest people, aka liars.

Brilliant.org has a quiz about truthtellers and liars,

and you need to use logic to figure out who's who.

You need to know that I know that she knows ... I don't know!

What I do know is that I've always liked riddles like this,

and this is supposed to be a challenging one, so let's go check it out!

So we're looking at Brilliant's Multi-Level Thinking course,

which is one of those things that you kinda hope you're really good at, but, uh, we'll see.

So here we have Alice, who says Bob is lying.

But then Bob says, "Neither of us is lying."

So now I have to figure out who's actually lying.

Alice is calling Bob a liar, but Bob is saying neither of us is a liar.

So if Bob was telling the truth, then Alice would also be telling the truth,

But Alice is saying that Bob is lying, so Alice must be telling the truth!

So even though this is kinda set up as a quiz, it doesn't really feel like I'm taking a quiz.

It's just kinda fun and it kinda sets you up to think about the next problem in the right way,

so that you can progress through the lesson.

Thanks for joining me, checking out Brilliant's Multi-Level Thinking course.

I'm really looking forward to going through their Computer Science one later

and I think you might enjoy checking them out too, so go to Brilliant.org/SciShow and you can sign up for free

and try them out. The first 200 people who sign up there will get 20% off their annual subscription.

[OUTRO ♪]

For more infomation >> How the Krack Hack Breaks Wi-Fi Security - Duration: 6:26.

-------------------------------------------

The Scariest Deleted Scenes From Horror Movies - Duration: 5:14.

Not every chilling horror scene makes it to the big screen.

Whether for pacing reasons, keeping the MPAA rating at an accessible "R," or simply the

filmmakers going in a different direction, these scenes were left on the cutting room

floor — but they're no less terrifying on their own.

Here are some of the scariest deleted scenes from your favorite horror movies.

But beware...the spoilers!

The cocoon room

There were a lot of ideas that never came to fruition in Ridley Scott's Alien, but what

we were left with was still a groundbreaking extraterrestrial thriller — often imitated,

never quite matched.

The plot follows a commercial space crew awoken from stasis after receiving a signal from

an alien craft.

They're overrun by the bloodthirsty extra-terrestrial monster, with Officer Ripley emerging as the

central heroine and only survivor.

One of the deleted scenes from the film might've answered a few questions left about the alien

— and escalated the fear factor.

In this cocoon room scene, Ripley happens upon the trapped bodies of the deceased Brett

and the still-alive Dallas, whose whereabouts were otherwise unknown after they ran into

the creature in the original cut.

As an act of mercy, Ripley has to fire-blast Dallas, which is pretty raw, even for Alien.

The baboon cat

The Fly is a seminal piece of horror, with or without its scariest deleted scene.

The sci-fi thriller followed Seth Brundle as he became a victim of his own oddball scientific

experiments.

He slowly morphed into a human-fly hybrid that was desperate to save his new species...by

making a baby with his human girlfriend.

In this deleted scene, even though Brundle's teleportation experience has clearly altered

his own DNA, he's still splicing animals together in his lab.

This time, it's a baboon and a house cat, which when combined becomes a two-headed,

sharp-toothed beast that goes on the attack and has to be exterminated.

It might've been a bit too obvious as foreshadowing if left in, but the scene definitely doesn't

offer much hope for Brundle's own future as a fellow lab mutant.

"I'm scared."

Uh, yeah.

Visions of Hell

Event Horizon is filled with stomach-churning imagery.

The movie followed a space crew as they attempted to make contact with a vessel that was temporarily

lost to a black hole, and layered itself with disturbing visuals before jumping headlong

into a living nightmare.

But as sinister as the scenes of this space inferno already are, the movie's original

vision of the bad place was even more disturbing.

"A dimension of pure chaos.

Pure evil."

In this deleted scene, Dr. William Weir has been fully transformed into the slash-faced

demon that haunts the ship and its remaining crew, and Captain Miller is chased down and

treated to an extreme vision of the other side.

Impaled, limb-ripped bodies are on display as the living are tied down and tortured.

The plights of these human souls may differ slightly, but the suffering is universal.

Given the graphic nature of this footage, it's not hard to see why an abbreviated version

was ultimately what made it into theaters.

Even Dante might've shuddered at the sight of this much underworldly punishment.

Dr. Satan's last lunge

With The Devil's Rejects, writer-director Rob Zombie took a decidedly different approach

to the macabre than he did with its predecessor, House of 1000 Corpses.

Rather than relying on gruesome imagery in the loathsome lair of the Firefly family,

the movie leaned harder on a slow burn of emotional torture and depravity as it followed

the three lead escapees through one final round of destruction.

For that reason, this deleted scene wasn't a good fit.

In the clip, we meet Dr. Satan again.

The character's twisted experimental surgeries featured prominently in the first film, and

in Rejects he's been captured by the authorities.

But he isn't as subdued as they think.

His unsuspecting nurse gets her throat ripped out after he awakens from his feigned coma,

and the move is so quick that the police and medical personnel can do nothing to stop her

from bleeding out on the hospital floor.

The tilted room

The adaptation of Stephen King's 1408 follows skeptical haunted house story author as he

rents out a deadly hotel room that's claimed the lives of dozens of occupants over the

last century.

What happens next is a bit formulaic, but is bolstered by sensory immersion with enough

paranormal surprises and emotional scenes to stick.

In this deleted scene, Jon Cusack's estranged wife has been summoned to the hotel by his

supernatural doppelgänger, and he's powerless to stop her from trying to enter the room.

As he tries to get close to prevent her from joining him, the room tilts to a degree that

disables him from reaching the door.

For all the elemental frights the room provided, this had to be the most disorienting, despite

being deleted.

The final cut

The theatrically released ending of Paranormal Activity was pretty upsetting.

In the film, Katie and Micah are a young couple who've moved to the wrong house at the wrong

time and can't shake the terrorizing spirits that came with it.

Despite their best efforts to exorcise the evil spirits from their home, Katie is eventually

possessed by the demon spirit, and appears to end Micah by summoning him downstairs and

then hurling his bloody body at the camera they'd been using to document their haunting.

She then shuffles onscreen, looks at the camera, and offers a smile that makes it clear she's

given herself over to evil.

In the original ending, though, Katie returns to the bedroom in what appears to be a trance

and sits rocking on the floor as time passes.

Eventually, the police show up, find Micah's body, and make their way upstairs to Katie.

She snaps out of her trance, but police believe she's a threat and shoot her.

The scariest version, though, is the alternate ending, when instead of launching Micah's

body at the camera, she returns to the frame herself, covered in blood and holding her

kitchen knife which she then uses on herself.

Chance are this one was passed over because it would've ended the hit franchise before

it began, but still.

What a way to go.

Thanks for watching!

Click the Looper icon to subscribe to our YouTube channel.

Plus check out all this cool stuff we know you'll love, too!

For more infomation >> The Scariest Deleted Scenes From Horror Movies - Duration: 5:14.

-------------------------------------------

Mild cognitive impairment and driving - Duration: 5:02.

It's a beautiful fall day here in New Jersey, and I'm headed out in a few minutes.

I've got a doctor's appointment, then I'm going to the grocery store, and then

driving into Bernardsville to have lunch with my wife — all the kind of normal daily activities

that we take for granted, until we face the possibility that someone is going to take

the car keys away.

For someone with mild cognitive impairment, that's a real concern.

Getting that diagnosis can be so shocking and frightening, and all sorts of worries

race through your head.

One of the first is likely to be, "Do I have to quit driving?"

That's a loaded question and one you want to consider carefully.

But don't assume the worst.

In most cases, people with mild cognitive impairment can continue to drive safely — often

for years.

So let's talk about why that is.

Hi, my name is Tony Dearing.

I write an award-winning column on brain health and prevention of dementia for NJ.com and

Star-Ledger and I operate GoCogno.com, a website for people with mild cognitive impairment.

If you've been diagnosed with MCI, you don't want to become a danger to yourself or anyone

else on the road.

And speaking statistically, you probably aren't.

One recent study looked at 57 adults over the age of 65 with mild cognitive impairment,

and compared them to 265 adults with normal memory for their age.

What they found was the people with MCI scored slightly lower on driving tests, but the difference

was insignificant, and both groups scored high enough to be considered safe drivers.

Now that doesn't mean that every person with mild cognitive impairment is safe to

drive.

But it really does underscore the difference between mild cognitive impairment and dementia.

Because MCI is not dementia, and this is one case where there really is a difference.

A person diagnosed with Alzheimer's is going to have to stop driving fairly soon.

They may potentially be able to drive for another year or two, but eventually they will

have to give up the car keys.

In fact, the concern is serious enough that your doctor would be required to report you

to the state motor vehicle commission and you'd have to take a test and pass that

driving test in order to continue to drive in the short term.

Now with mild cognitive impairment, it's completely different.

Both the American and Canadian Medical Associations have taken the stance that mild cognitive

impairment does not warrant a loss of driving privileges.

In fact, unlike a diagnosis of Alzheimer's, if you have MCI, neither you or your doctors

is even required to report that to the state.

Now you still need to make a decision that's right for you.

And to help you do that, I invite you to go to my site, GoCogno.com, where I have published

an article with safety tips for driving with MCI.

This will help show you how you can continue to drive safely and also help you know when

it may be time to consider giving up the keys.

Another thing that's important to understand is that in most cases, signs that your driving

ability is slipping occur long before you are likely to be involved in any serious accident.

So if you know what those signs are and you can recognize them, that's another way to

stay safe and be comfortable and secure on the road.

I've put together a list of 20 of those common warning signs and if it's helpful,

I'd be glad to send it to you.

Send me an email to tonydearing@gocogno.com and I'll be glad to send you that list of

20 common warning signs.

So I hope you've found this helpful, and sorry, but I am going to sign off now.

I've got to get to my doctor's appointment.

But thanks for joining me today, and I'll hope to see you again next week.

Until then, as always, be kind to your mind.

For more infomation >> Mild cognitive impairment and driving - Duration: 5:02.

-------------------------------------------

Clean Bandit ‒ I Miss You (Lyrics) ft. Julia Michaels - Duration: 3:41.

clean bandit julia michaels i miss you

clean bandit julia michaels i miss you lyrics

i miss you lyrics

For more infomation >> Clean Bandit ‒ I Miss You (Lyrics) ft. Julia Michaels - Duration: 3:41.

-------------------------------------------

Boost your RV Cell Signal

For more infomation >> Boost your RV Cell Signal

-------------------------------------------

New Fun Baby Care Games for Kids 🎮 Cat Hair Salon Birthday Party - Fun Cool Games Animal Dress Up f - Duration: 21:43.

For more infomation >> New Fun Baby Care Games for Kids 🎮 Cat Hair Salon Birthday Party - Fun Cool Games Animal Dress Up f - Duration: 21:43.

-------------------------------------------

[Eng sub] Fairy Fencer F Sherman Drama CD - Duration: 9:12.

The view from here is beautiful, isn't it?

The glow from a countless houses lighting up the night...

It captures your heart no matter what time of day it is.

Though...

I don't like the expression of them being jewels that have fallen to earth.

No matter who they are, all humans work their hardest in order to defend their home.

The light shining from all these houses could be said to be the radiance of the human spirit.

It's disrespectful to compare them to a mere object, at least, that's what I think.

My apologies, I rambled on for quite awhile there.

I rarely ever visit restuarants with such a view, so I may have gotten abit nervous.

Was that so unexpected?

I don't come from an affluent background.

Even now, my occupation is that of a rough and tumble fencer.

Is using "rough and tumble" a little to far?

While it's true that I became a fencer in order to achieve my dream of world peace,

in order to realize my dream, I need to hurt others and forcibly acquire furies.

Isn't it ironic? Using violence to achieve peace?

Even if it is for the sake of peace,

a path that does not require the harming of others is definitely more righteous.

But if no one were to fight for world peace,

then evil will always exist.

This is why I took a path that would bring me into conflict with others.

Am I using violence to achieve peace,

or am I merely resorting to violence for it's own sake?

I have to constantly ask myself this.

So that I do now become mad with power.

Heh, it appears I got sidetracked.

Anyway, I hardly ever get the chance to visit restaurants such as this.

I'm together with you today, so I thought I'd aim for something higher, but...

I guess I can't help but be nervous.

I've been talking about nothing but myself...

I hope this doesn't throw you off,

but you are exceptionally beautiful today.

I feel that you are a pure and precious existence that has overcome the evils of man.

If I were a more eloquent person,

I'll be able to properly capture your beauty in words,

but unfortunately I'm only capable of playing a few simple tunes on the piano.

Though, it's only though my simple piano performances that I managed to meet you.

So it seems that my skills are not completely worthless.

Ah, a bug-

This is...a minion of the vile god, a mosquito!

How dare you show yourself before me!

I'll crush you! Eat this ladle!

You piece of garbage! Die!

The likes of you belong in hell!

M-My apologies.

I've shown you something disgraceful.

Were you surprised?

I really didn't want to show you this side of me, but...

Whenever I see a mosquito, I get overcome by my hatred for the vile god...

When I was little, my village was attacked by followers of of the vile god.

The only survivors were my mother and me.

And my mother died not long after, griped in fear of the vile god.

After going through that, I gained a strong desire for world peace, and ended up becoming a fencer.

The world peace that I have in mind is one where all memories of the vile god has been removed.

The only reason why I desire world peace is due to the vile god's influence.

Ever since that day, my heart has been filled with hatred for the vile god.

Thus, whenever I see a minion of the vile god, I end up flying into a rage.

Mosquito, snake, crows, octopus, spider, and so on.

There are 18 such creatures.

You must think I'm hopeless, don't you?

But, rest assured.

No matter what comes over me, I will never do anything to harm you.

Lets change the subject, shall we?

Why did you accept my invitation today?

Because my piano is enchanting no matter how often you hear it?

Thank you.

When I think that my music was able to touch you, I feel extremely elated.

The truth is, I knew of you even before I first talked to you a few days ago.

You've always attended my performances, haven't you?

I don't know when it happened, but before I knew it, my eyes were constantly drawn towards you.

I always searched for your presence whenever I took the stage.

On the days when I couldn't spot you, I ended up unable to focus on my piano.

I suppose that makes me a failure of a performer.

I've liked you for a long time.

That's why, when I called out to you after that performance the other day...

I felt like it was fated to be.

"Your other fans would get angry if they found out that we were together."?

That's an odd thing to bring up.

I don't have fans.

That's merely wishful thinking.

At the very least, I don't desire any fans other than you.

Rather than a relationship where I have to keep you at a distance,

I would much rather we have a closer relationship.

One in which no one else would be able to get between.

Are you still worried? Then, what about this?

Lets keep today a secret between us.

That way, we won't end up making anyone angry.

And lets create alot of secrets together in the future.

Seems like the next dish has arrived.

Ah, doesn't it look delicious?

T-This is-

This is octopus!?

As if I could eat this!

Damned minions of the vile god! To appear before me not once but twice!

Defiling this table is unforgivable!

Learn your place!

Fuck! Fuck! Fuck!

Accursed vile god! I'll **** your heart three times and ******* **** it right up!

How's that! Do you lament!?

You disgusting creature!

**** your mother!

Ah, what have I done?

My apologies.

Your beautiful dress is in such a horrible state!

How can I make up for it?

Eh? You're leaving? Please wait!

There won't be a next time. I'll restrain myself, I swear!

Please give me another chance!

Ah, please wait!

She really left...

This is because of that vile god...

How much of my life do you wish to screw up before you are sastisfied?

Damned vile god...

I swear, I'll create a just world where not even a scrap of you remains.