Hi curious and curious, I'm JJ Priego, welcome to "Science of Science", that little place,
where we see that the known finite and infinite is unknown.
A few days ago, I read the news that an American filmmaker, opened a profile
in Tinder, a 'sex robot', with pictures, that was clear, it was not a human being,
and if, a kind of sex toy quite realistic.
In just a few minutes, he managed almost a hundred suitors.
The author of 'experiment', decided to respond to all of them, posing as the girl
synthetic, and proposing a sexual encounter with them.
Half confirmed mutual interest and believed really be chatting with
a kind of artificial intelligence, specializing in 'hot' conversations.
This news does not stop being a sociological curiosity, which demonstrates the past
laps are some for life and who would be willing to maintain relations
up with an exhaust pipe.
But ... you want to know more Artifical Intelligence?
Well, let's look around.
[MUSIC]
A part of the sex robot that I commented earlier, there are other hoaxes concerning
Artificial Intelligence.
This also certainly worthy of analysis by the media,
and the way in which transferred some technology news type.
It turns out that a few weeks ago, the press of half the planet, titled as' an act
unprecedented, the robot Pepper appear before the British Parliament, becoming,
the first humanoid, on being questioned by parliamentarians around the world '.
Besides being a lie, the first statement is false the second.
Neither was the first robot, who appeared before a parliament (only needed to make a
Simple network) search, nor was questioned.
The little theater is a supino ridiculous.
See 'their lordships' in a conversation prepared, and asking the robotillo on
skills debate about the future of coexistence with humans is
of embarrassment, if not even dangerous.
And, it is dangerous to show a series of developments that do not exist, and probably,
They never exisitirán that.
Artificial intelligence, is something much more serious than this dramatization.
Granted, it can be nutritious, interesting even show an exercise made the debate
and popularize, but after the event, it would not hurt, comment on press and
and reflect, it's all a remarkable hoax, and that neither thinks nor the robot will think.
The worst thing is not that the present know, how fucked up is that the press, believe it or
it wants to believe, publishes it, and replica issuing, to the point, that
it seems that the state of the art artificial intelligence in the world, is similar to that
It is seen in 'Her' in 'ExMachina' or any science fiction movie.
And we are, scientifically speaking, light years away from that.
There, who Descojonado with the matter.
Hence, it is interesting, to put the matter in its proper place, for two reasons.
For economic commercial basis, and artificial intelligence, expert systems
and deep learning, we are going to change the way we work, but not because talk
like us, or think, but because they are faster, more efficient and economic, which
us to do what we do.
The other reason is because companies engaged in the manufacture and distribution,
of these products, they meet the famous 'I thought I had more stuff'.
And of course, little discouraging for these companies spend so much effort ...
And, we need to see exactly where the matter is, as far as actually reaches
artificial intelligence ...
It is clear that there is some development, really advanced as Sophia.
A robot with which you can 'talk' and which, after the last 'updates'
really surprised at the dialectic and the apparent learning.
But do not think, no artificial consciousness.
And, one thing is robotics and other artificial intelligence.
One thing is that a system is extremely efficient solving things and another is that
think.
At one point, David Hanson, the loquacious CEO of Hanson Robotics, the company that has
Sophia developed, said that 'it (the robot Sophia), was basically living'
one of the most watched television programs in the world, the Tonight Show Jimmy
Fallon.
Sophia held a conversation with the presenter and all rushed.
Adoration of the press, spread throughout the world, inversely, to criticism about
what really it happened there.
Sophia began to travel the world, to participate as 'rapporteur' in a lot of conferences,
congresses and events.
The summit was, in Saudi Arabia, where he was granted citizenship rights
and duties.
He was said to be 'non-human first citizen of the world'.
Represented a before and after.
And there is no doubt that Sophia is an impressive piece of engineering.
Hanson Robotics and SingularityNET, collaborating with technology companies worldwide,
Sophia have equipped with sophisticated neural networks, which give you the ability to learn,
people, and detect and reflect emotional responses, what does that look like
the robot has personality.
However, we must see in Sophia, a kind of complex sociology experiment a
analysis of expectations.
Ben Goertzel, CEO and chief scientist SingularityNET Hanson Robotics, and
He said Sophia and the other robots, are not pure learning systems, but involve
learning at various levels, such as performing, visual systems in their networks
neuronal, learning their systems OpenCog dialogue, or others who have designed.
That seems fair.
Is that really, at the same time, which is interesting, the public perception of Sophia in its various
aspects, intelligence, appearance and kindness.
Hence we are moving closer to reality.
The problem comes when projects highly publicized, as Sophia, convince us,
that true artificial intelligence (human-like), is around
the corner, when, in fact, are not even close.
And, the true state of research, AI has fallen far behind the
fairy tales technology we are made to believe.
And if we do not treat the AI with some realism and skepticism, their progress may be threatened.
We can work with artificial intelligence models, business intelligence systems
experts and all kinds of intelligent data managers, but none is aware.
We can go to Japan, Israel and the United States in centers where AI is really
advanced, but it is interesting to say, which is exactly what is, for
serving and deny everything else.
For the sake of their progress.
To define well what AI is constantly modified by new developments, and
changes in objectives, described best by explaining what it is not.
Many people think that AI is an intelligent robot that can do things that
a very intelligent person would do: a robot that knows everything and can answer any
question, but this is not what they really mean when they talk about experts
HE.
In general, AI refers to computer programs that can complete multiple analysis, and use
some predefined criteria to make decisions.
Nothing that is not enough, for now.
For some time we have a variant, which would be what is called Hlai, intelligence
artificial human level.
The ability of certain systems communicate effectively.
The chatbots and language processors based on automatic learning,
strive to infer meanings or understand nuances, and the ability to continue learning
over time.
At this time, the artificial intelligence has free will and certainly not
is aware: two assumptions, that people tend to believe, when faced with technology
advanced.
AI systems, more advanced than there are simply products, following processes
defined by intelligent people.
They can not make decisions on their own.
In machine learning, including deep learning and neural networks,
is nothing more (or less) than an algorithm with a large amount of data collected, constantly,
until you can complete the task alone.
For facial recognition software, for example, this would mean introducing,
thousands of photos or videos of faces in the system, until you can detect reliably,
one side of a sample unlabeled.
More or less it is that, but never 'understand' what you are doing, nor can quit,
because the algorithm decides for itself.
Consider, that our best algorithms, machine learning, are generally
memory mechanisms, and execute statistical models.
The problem is, when we call that 'learn' and so we give a human value
to machines that have nothing to do with a human brain.
And, now everything is "smart".
Coffeemakers, refrigerators, cars, telephones, watches, etc.
That confuses everything.
To be understood.
If an algorithm is designed to add, always add.
After learning that five plus two equals seven human could realize that,
two is five to seven.
A complex deduction, if you know beforehand but can not subtract.
Now if you ask the same algorithm, which subtract two numbers after teaching
to add, you can not.
The artificial intelligence of the algorithm, as it somehow was trained
to add, not to understand what it means to add.
If you want to subtract, you must train him again in that space.
A process that erases notoriously everything the artificial intelligence system
I had previously learned.
Learns a human error, a machine, so far only identifies that was wrong
but not what it means.
Among researchers who need to create expectations, developers who need investment, and
journalists, who may not know the technical background, what have you, is
creating a potential problem in the medium term, which could actually be very harmful,
for the actual development of the sector.
This unjustified promotion, could be preventing a real and useful progress.
Financial investments in artificial intelligence, are inextricably linked,
the level of interest and publicity arising from the sector.
That level of interest and related investments fluctuate greatly when Sophia has
a forced conversation, or some new algorithm, machine learning, achieved
something mildly interesting.
That makes, it is difficult to establish a steady flow of capital and base, in the
that researchers can trust, and hence, many developers are provided
the show.
Clearly mola, a chatbot simulate natural language, but the important thing. is
know he does, as he does, as far as he is able to reach and how we can make
learn to do more and better.
Because, finally, no current software thinks like a human, nor is aware
of its own existence.
They simulate well, yeah, that if, and can hold conversations, but do not think.
So I think that, really, before addressing the issue of artificial intelligence, we should
sure, if we are not overwhelmed by artificial stupidity.
How you have fallen curious and inquisitive?
What do you think of the video?
And this genius?
I you can put your opinions in the comments.
Well, if you liked this video I give the like.
And if it's your first time in "Science of Science" Give this button Subscribe
channel, also the bell to keep abreast of developments.
Finally I recommend you follow my other 2 channels, "Stories of History" and "Easypromos
TV".
You will like them.
And remember, knowledge is an essential requirement for survival.
Many thanks.
No comments:
Post a Comment